Jun 5 2009 - 4:45pm
It's not official, but John Stamos recently revealed that
he's conceptualizing a Full House feature film — "but it wouldn't be us playing us." So who would be playing the men in this beloved '90s family? I know you've weighed in on
a Full House recast before, but here are Stamos's suggestions:
Jesse Katsopolis — James Franco
Danny Tanner — Steve Carell
Joey Gladstone — Tracy Morgan
Stamos added, "'I'm not 100% sure, but it would probably take place in the first few years' of the 1987-95 series."
Like this? Be the first! Please login or register to like this
25 Comments Post a Comment
NO!!! I love Full House, but I don't want to see a movie without the original cast.
1Wow... how original ::rolls eyes::
2More important than yes or no is WHY. Why on earth do we need a Full House movie????
3Only if Uncle Jessie teaches us a new word in the movie. My assimilation of new vocabulary froze at "apprehensive."
4I loathe Full House and I wish that this country could have been spared from such a disastrous show. However, a Full House movie would be of the same caliber of movie that continues making it to theaters nowadays.
5Tracy Morgan?? Random..
6I think with the original cast-- it could be pretty awesome...
Like DJ having a baby with Danny stressing about becoming a grandfather.... Stefanie could be dating around still, jealous of DJ a la middle-child-syndrome... and Michelle could be graduating college and temping at some corny place. It could be awesome.
7Using the original cast would carry out more numbers in the box office.
8I agree that using the original cast would make it WAY more interesting. And I bet they could get every single cast member except for the Olsens.
9What possible plot could they create that would be movie-worthy? Pass...unless they want to have a family talk about Stephanie's meth addiction.
10Hah!! I'm neither yay or nay, but I'm interested
11My initial reaction sticks: OMG NO!
12NO NO NO. I loved Full House, but this is taking it too far. Especially if it's not using the same cast.
13I've said before I don't like Full House so really it doesn't matter to me if they make a movie or not. I won't see it.
14um no
15i think that it would miss out a huge demographic. I mean hardly anyone under 25 will watch it now and probably barely anyone over 45 or 50. i am 16 and i have only ever heard of it in relation to the olson twins and it sounds like a terrible show, that was only known because they were cute. Also it was widely watched in America.
16NAY! In my opinion, it's time has come & gone - 10 years!
17Dear god. We're going through a recession, the world is in financial crisis. Why the hell does the world need a frakking Full House revisit?!
Sounds more like a vanity project to me.
18i think that a movie would be a bad idea and i cna't imagine that anyone would want to see it. remember when they did a growing pains TV movie and a Fact of Life TV movie and see how poorly those did in ratings? doing full house on the big screen would be a waste of money - and i was a fan....
19I hope this doesn't happen.
20Unless it was the original cast, I say no, this sounds laaame!
21i hope they don't. everytime they take an old show or movie and recast it the show loses something. i'm not saying that full house was a great show in its time but i did watch it. it was corney but did have values ... something that today's shows lack. how about a full house reunion with the original cast? i'd watch ... just to see what everyone looks like now.
22Without the original cast this movie does sound dumb. But, I do love my James Frano
23yes it would be a fun movie
24My answer is WHY? I admit I watched the show when nothing else was on and looked at Stamos like I was a female wolf in heat---but when he'd open his mouth I was like "never mind" this dude is pretty but a bit too sappy.
The show was campy...syrupy...and just a bit too unrealistic.
If they made a comeback will they reveal someone was divorced because Daddy couldn't make enough money pretending to be Elvis==or never grew up...and the other single male was gay, relationship-challenged, or ran off to join the circus? Did any of the girls go get knocked-up and not finish college, became addicted to drugs, or married an abusive man? Did "Dad" ever remarry--and if so to a controlling shrew, gold-digger, or some homely but bubbly tupperware dealer? Did any of them lose their job, then their home?----oh yeah they all stayed together---which was sort of weird....so did they ever become self-reliant?
See...my point is that the original show was an idealistic view of life: sort of the soap opera for syrup-addicted relationship dreamers. There was very little "real" factors present in that show. It was a dose of "feel" good hope.
Three single men with children. One a widow and the other two doting uncles. Where was the episodes of the uncles sneaking women in the back door from a night at a club? Or those awkward moments when kids were faced with half naked strange women in the bathroom, drunk uncles, dirty laundry that nobody wanted to do, and kitchen dishes nobody wanted to do.
I have never met three single men who volunteered to do not only their own laundry, dishes and house cleaning and also those of children.
I'm sorry...I forgot this was a TV show. Real life rarely shows up in a TV show.
Please---no hate mail from the FANS of this show. I understand why it was so successful--but also know it probably made single men everywhere a bit angry...most would never have been as selfless as the characters on this show.
25Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.