FitSugar

Living and Raw Foods Diet

FitSugar — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:30:00 -0700

I've been hearing a lot about people on a Raw Foods Diet. It's also called a Living Foods Diet, and many celebrities such as Demi Moore, Woody Harrelson, Bryan Adams, Alicia Silverstone and Robin Williams have reportedly been seen at raw food restaurants and have tried it. Designer Donna Karan and actor Jeremy Piven shed pounds eating raw foods. It was even featured on Oprah.

People following this diet (or you could also say "lifestyle", since there are a lot of folks that eat RAW not to lose weight but for the philosophy) eat only uncooked, unheated, unprocessed, and organic plant based foods. Well...food that has not been heated above a certain temperature. It varies within the different raw food philosophies, but the end range temperature is in between 92ºF to 118ºF (33°C to 48°C). Meals consist mainly of organic and raw fruits, vegetables, sprouted seeds and grains, sea vegetables, nuts, and seeds since they believe cooking destroys precious vitamins and minerals. For instance to eat grains, instead of cooking them, they are soaked. Raw foodies believe their uncooked foods contain essential enzymes, which the body needs to digest foods completely.

They drink only purified water (never tap water), freshly made juices (made with a juicer), and coconut milk. They avoid meat, dairy, sugar, alcohol, coffee (because you make it with boiling water), and all junk food. They only eat foods that are good for you, you know, the ones that are full of vitamins and nutrients.

Why eat just raw and living foods? It is said that you'll have more energy, think more clearly, have improved overall health, and lose excess body weight. Many people have also found relief from migraines, acne, asthma, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, depression, heartburn, anxiety, and Type 2 diabetes.

Fit's Tips: If you want to learn more about it, check out Alissa Cohen's website all about The Raw Food Diet. She even includes recipes for burgers, pizza, cannolis, and chocolate cake - all made with raw foods and no animal products.

Want to see a video showing how to make a pasta dish with raw foods? Then read more

Source

Carol Alt Eats It Raw

FitSugar — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:30:47 -0800

Carol Alt used to hit the runways, but now she's hitting the produce aisle, since she's way into the raw food diet. She's been following it for the past 12 years, so what got her hooked? Early in her modeling career, she was told to lose weight and did so by dieting (and depriving herself) silly. She became really unhealthy, was always tired and sick with colds and the flu, and had respiratory issues. When she tried the raw food diet, her health dramatically improved, yet she was able to maintain the lean size she needed for modeling. Now at age 48, she still has that amazing figure and is even showing it off in the December issue of Playboy. Carol's goal was to "promote raw eating and to show women that they, too, can look their best at any age."

To hear more about this diet and see a video of Carol explaining how it can help you maintain a healthy weight, read more.

If you're not familiar with the raw food diet, it's just like it sounds. All the foods are organic and raw, including uncooked veggies, fresh fruits, soaked grains, and sprouted seeds and breads. Most raw followers avoid meat and dairy, but Carol eats sashimi (raw seafood), carpaccio (thinly sliced raw beef, veal, or tuna), and raw milk cheeses. It's believed that eating a Raw Food Diet can increase your energy level, help you lose excess weight, relieve migraines and depression, lower cholesterol and high blood pressure, and can also eliminate acne and asthma.

If you want more information, Carol wrote two books, Eating in the Raw ($11) and The Raw 50 ($12). She not only raves about this lifestyle, but she also includes recipe ideas so you can start reaping the same health benefits.

Check out her peppy video interview below.

Source

Peptic ulcers

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:38 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Risk with cardiovascular medications

While nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the major medications responsible for causing peptic ulcers, drugs taken for cardiovascular disease and its risk factors may also cause ulcers. Recent studies have found an association between increased risk of ulcer and the following drugs:

Spironolactone, a common diuretic used in heart failure
Niacin, a drug used to lower "bad" cholesterol and raise "good" cholesterol
Vitamin K antagonists, commonly prescribed anticoagulants
Dipyridamole, a drug for secondary stroke prevention
Low-dose aspirin, prescribed for both heart attack and stroke prevention

Risk of peptic ulcer increases dramatically when these drugs are used in combination. Considering the millions of people who take these medications to prevent a life-threatening cardiovascular event, their impact on peptic ulcer development could be monumental.

Atypical symptoms of GERD

The burning pain of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be confused with that of an ulcer. However, GERD pain typically develops after meals and is relieved by antacids. Elderly patients may have different symptoms that can include loss of appetite, weight loss, anemia, vomiting, or difficulty swallowing. A careful examination may be necessary to diagnose the underlying cause, since GERD and peptic ulcer may coexist.

Adjustments in triple therapy

Peptic ulcers are commonly treated with the triple combination of two antibiotics (amoxicillin and clarithromycin) and a proton-pump inhibitor. Therapy usually lasts for 2 weeks. Recent studies indicate that 1 week may be just as effective. In addition, taking the antibiotics in sequence, rather than at the same time, may work better to eliminate H. pylori, the bacteria responsible for most ulcers.

Healing foods

Milk may not be the ideal food for people with peptic ulcers because it encourages the production of stomach acid. However, certain qualities found in fermented milks and yogurts may actually offer protection against gastric ulcers. Likewise, the phenolic compounds found in virgin olive oil appear to kill many strains of H. pylori, including some that have become resistant to antibiotics. Vegetables contain dietary nitrate, which increases nitric oxide in the gut, causing the mucus layer to thicken. This increases protection against H. pylori invasion.

Protection when taking NSAIDs

People who take NSAIDs for pain control have an immediate increased risk of ulcers. Chronic use increases risk dramatically. Taking a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2 blocker is necessary to reduce this risk. A review of clinical trials found three PPIs [omeprazole (Prilosec), esomeprazole (Nexium), and lansoprazole (Prevacid)] to be more effective than the H2 blocker ranitidine (Zantac). When NSAIDs were discontinued, however, healing rates with ranitidine reached nearly 100%.

Introduction

A peptic ulcer is an open sore or raw area that tends to develop in one of two places:

The lining of the stomach ( gastric ulcer), or
The upper part of the small intestine -- the duodenum ( duodenal ulcers). In the U.S., duodenal ulcers are 3 times more common than gastric ulcers.

A peptic ulcer is an open sore or raw area in the lining of the stomach (gastric) or the upper part of the small intestine (duodenal).

Ulcers average between one-quarter and one-half inch in diameter. They develop when digestive juices produced in the stomach, intestines, and digestive glands damage the lining of the stomach or duodenum.

The two important digestive juices are hydrochloric acid and the enzyme pepsin. Both substances are critical in the breakdown and digestion of starches, fats, and proteins in food. They play different roles in ulcers:

Click the icon to see an image of the stomach.

Hydrochloric acid. A common misbelief is that excess hydrochloric acid, which is secreted in the stomach, is solely responsible for producing ulcers. Patients with duodenal ulcers do tend to have higher-than-normal levels of hydrochloric acid, but most patients with gastric ulcers have normal or lower-than-normal acid levels. Some stomach acid is important for protecting against H. pylori, the bacteria that causes most peptic ulcers. [Note: An exception is ulcers that occur in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. This is a rare genetic condition in which very high levels of gastrin, a potent acid, are secreted by tumors in the pancreas or duodenum.]
Pepsin. Pepsin is an enzyme that breaks down proteins in food. Since the stomach and duodenum are also composed of protein, they are also susceptible to the actions of pepsin. Pepsin is, then, also important in the formation of ulcers.

Fortunately, the body has a defense system to protect the stomach and intestine against these powerful substances:

The mucous layer, which coats the stomach and duodenum, forms the first line of defense.
Bicarbonate, which the mucous layer secretes, neutralizes the digestive acids.
Hormone-like substances called prostaglandins help dilate the blood vessels in the stomach to ensure good blood flow and protect against injury. Prostaglandins are also believed to stimulate bicarbonate and mucus production.

Disrupting any of these defense mechanisms makes the stomach and intestine lining susceptible to the actions of acid and pepsin, increasing the risk for ulcers.

Causes

Before the discovery of the bacterium Helicobacter (H.) pylori, the stomach was believed to be a sterile environment. However, in 1982 two Australian scientists identified H. pylori as the main cause of stomach ulcers. They showed that inflammation of the stomach and stomach ulcers result from an infection of the stomach caused by the H. pylori bacteria. This discovery was so important that the researchers were awarded the Nobel Price in Medicine in 2005. The bacteria appear to trigger ulcers in the following way:

H. pylori's corkscrew shape enables it to penetrate the mucous layer of the stomach or duodenum so it can attach itself to the lining.
It survives in the highly acidic environment by producing urease, an enzyme that generates ammonia to neutralize the acid.
H. pylori then produces a number of toxins and factors that can cause inflammation and damage to the lining, leading to ulcers in certain individuals.
It also alters certain immune factors that allow it to evade detection and cause persistent inflammation for a life -- even without invading the mucous membrane.

Even if ulcers do not develop, the bacterium is now considered to be a major cause of active chronic inflammation in the stomach (gastritis) and in the upper part of the small intestine (duodenitis).

It is also strongly linked to stomach (gastric) cancer and possibly other non-intestinal problems.

Factors that Trigger Ulcers in H. pylori Carriers.H. pylori is found in about 25% of people who do not have peptic ulcers. The magnitude of H. pylori infection, particularly in older people, may not always predict the presence or absence of peptic ulcers. Other variables must to be present to actually trigger ulcers. These may include:

Genetic Factors. Some people harbor genetic strains of H. pylori that may make the bacteria more dangerous and increase the risk for ulcers. The most intensively investigated genetic factor is cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), which has been associated with both gastric and duodenal ulcers, as well as with stomach cancer. Other genetic types that may also increase bacterial severity are called vacuolating cytotoxin (vacA) and antigen-binding adhesin (BabA) genotypes. Some of these genetic factors may be more or less important for development of ulcers, depending on ethnicity.
Immune Abnormalities. Some experts suggest that certain individuals have abnormalities in the immune response of the intestine, which allow the bacteria to injure the lining.
Lifestyle Factors. Although lifestyle factors such as chronic stress, drinking coffee, and smoking were long believed to be primary causes of ulcers, it is now thought they only increase susceptibility to ulcers in some H. pylori carriers.
Shift Work and Other Causes of Interrupted Sleep. People who work the night shift have a significantly higher incidence of ulcers than day workers. Researchers suspect that frequent interruptions of sleep may weaken the ability of the immune system to protect against endotoxins.

When H. pylori was first identified as the major cause of peptic ulcers, it was found in 90% of people with duodenal ulcers and in about 80% of people with gastric ulcers. As more people are being tested and treated for the bacteria, however, the rate of H. pylori- associated ulcers has declined. For example, a 2001 study suggested that about half of ulcers are not caused by H. pylori. Instead, they tend to be caused by regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which include aspirin and other common pain relievers. Genetic factors or, rarely, Crohn's disease or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, also cause ulcers.

Some researchers now believe that duodenal ulcers are not caused by H. pylori, but that the presence of the bacteria simply delays healing. This fact, they say, may explain why up to half of cases of acute duodenal perforation show no evidence of H. pylori, and why duodenal ulcers can recur even after H. pylori has been eradicated.

A 2006 study published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry indicates that a protein called decay-accelerating factor (DAF) acts as receptor for H. pylori. Animal studies show that blocking this interaction renders H. pylori harmless to the stomach. Researchers hope the discovery leads to new drugs that can reduce the risk of peptic ulcer.

Long-term use of NSAIDs is the second most common cause of ulcers, and the rate of NSAID-caused ulcers is increasing. About 20 million people take prescription NSAIDs regularly, and more than 25 billion tablets of over-the-counter brands are sold each year in the U.S. alone. The most common NSAIDs are aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), and naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn), although many others are available. Patients with NSAID-caused ulcers should stop taking these drugs.

There is no doubt NSAIDs increase the risk of ulcers and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The risk of bleeding is continuous for as long as a patient takes these drugs and may persist for about one year after stopping. Short courses of NSAIDs for temporary pain relief should not cause major problems, because the stomach has time to recover and repair any damage that has occurred.

Specific NSAIDs pose greater or lesser risks for ulcers and bleeding. No NSAIDs, however, even over-the-counter brands, should be used long-term except under a doctor's direction.

Lowest Risk

Medium Risk

Highest Risk

Nabumetone (Relafen)

Etodolac (Lodine)

Salsalate

Sulindac (Clinoril)

Aspirin. Even low-dose ("baby") aspirin (81 mg) may pose some risk

Ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, Nuprin, Rufen)

Naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn, Naprelan, Anaprox)

Diclofenac (Voltaren), Tolmetin (Tolectin)

NOTE: Drugs in the medium risk group vary in risk. For example, studies show that naproxen is twice as likely as ibuprofen to be associated with hospitalization from GI bleeding.

Flurbiprofen (Ansaid), Piroxicam (Feldene), Fenoprofen Indomethacin (Indocin), Meclofenamate (Meclomen)

Ketoprofen (Actron, Orudis KT). Note: Ketoprofen is often considered a medium-risk drug, but one study reported that taking the drug in low doses for as little as 1 week causes significant GI injury.

Certain drugs other than NSAIDs may cause or aggravate ulcers, particularly those taken for cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. A review of more than 306,000 primary care patients found that spironolactone, a common diuretic prescribed in heart failure, was associated with a 2.7% increased risk of ulcer or upper GI bleeding. Exacerbation of peptic ulcers is a rare but noted side effect of niacin, a drug that can reduce LDL cholesterol and raise HDL cholesterol. Low-dose aspirin, dipyridamole, and vitamin K antagonists such as Coumadin nearly double the risk of upper GI bleeding. When these drugs are used in combination, the risk soars.

Risk of GI perforation was seen in phase 3 clinical trials of bevacizumab, the first vascular endothelial growth factor agent (VEGF) approved by the FDA. This drug has been shown to increase survival and stop the progression of metastatic colorectal cancer when used in combination with chemotherapy. While the benefits of bevacizumab outweigh the risks, GI perforation is very serious. If it occurs, the drug must be discontinued.

The least common major cause of peptic ulcer disease is Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES).

Rarely, certain conditions may cause ulceration in the stomach or intestine, including:

Radiation treatments
Bacterial or viral infections
Alcohol abuse
Physical injury
Burns

What is ZES? Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is the least common major cause of peptic ulcer disease. In this condition, tumors in the pancreas and duodenum (gastrinomas) produce excessive amounts of gastrin, a hormone that stimulates gastric acid formation. These tumors are usually malignant, so proper and prompt management of the disease is essential.

Another cause of peptic ulcer, although far less common than H. pylori or NSAIDs, is Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. A large amount of excess acid is produced in response to the overproduction of the hormone gastrin, which in turn is caused by tumors on the pancreas or duodenum. These tumors are usually malignant, must be removed and acid production suppressed to relieve the recurrence of the ulcers.

Who Gets ZES? The incidence of ZES in the United States is estimated at 1 case per million people per year, and at 0.1 - 1% among patients with peptic ulcers. The mean age at onset is 45 - 50, and men are affected more often than women.

How Is ZES Diagnosed? ZES should be suspected in patients with ulcers who are not infected with H. pylori and have no history of NSAID use. Diarrhea may precede ulcer symptoms. Ulcers occurring in the second, third, or fourth portions of the duodenum or the jejunum (the middle section of the small intestine) are signs of ZES. GERD is more prevalent and often more severe in patients with ZES, and can be complicated by ulcerations and strictures of the esophagus.

How Is ZES Treated? Peptic ulcers associated with ZES are typically persistent and difficult to treat. Treatment consists of removing the tumors and suppressing acid with an intravenous proton-pump inhibitor (Protonix). Previously, removing the stomach was the only option.

Symptoms

Dyspepsia. The most common symptoms of peptic ulcer are known collectively as dyspepsia. Peptic ulcers can occur without dyspepsia or any other gastrointestinal symptom, especially when caused by NSAIDs. Dyspepsia may be persistent or recurrent and can encompass a variety of symptoms in the upper abdomen, including:

Pain or discomfort
Bloating
A feeling of fullness. People with severe dyspepsia are unable to drink as much fluid as people with mild or no dyspepsia.
Hunger and an empty feeling in the stomach, often 1 - 3 hours after a meal
Mild nausea (Vomiting, in fact, may relieve symptoms.)
Regurgitation (sensation of acid backing up into the throat.)
Belching

Ulcer Pain. The pain of ulcers can be either localized in one place or diffuse. The pain is described as a burning, gnawing, or aching in the upper abdomen, or as a stabbing pain penetrating through the gut. The symptoms may vary depending on the location of the ulcer:

Duodenal ulcers often cause a gnawing pain in the upper stomach area several hours after a meal, and the pain is often relieved by eating a meal.
Gastric ulcers may cause a dull, aching pain, often right after a meal; eating does not relieve the pain and may even worsen it. Pain may also occur at night.

Ulcer pain may be particularly confusing or disconcerting when it radiates to the back or to the chest behind the breastbone. In such cases it can be confused with other conditions such as heart attack.

Because ulcers can cause hidden bleeding, patients may experience the symptoms of anemia, including fatigue and shortness of breath.

A sudden onset of severe symptoms may indicate intestinal obstruction, perforation, or hemorrhage, all of which are emergencies. Symptoms may include:

Tarry, black, or bloody stools
Severe vomiting, which may include blood or a substance with the appearance of coffee grounds (a sign of a serious hemorrhage) or entire stomach contents (sign of intestinal obstruction)
Severe abdominal pain with or without vomiting or evidence of blood

Anyone who experiences any of these symptoms should go to the emergency room immediately.

Peptic ulcers may lead to emergency situations. Severe abdominal pain with or without evidence of bleeding may indicate a perforation of the ulcer through the stomach or duodenum. Vomiting of a substance that resembles coffee grounds or the presence of black tarry stools may indicate serious bleeding.

Complications

Most people with severe ulcers experience significant pain and sleeplessness, which can have a dramatic and adverse impact on their quality of life.

Peptic ulcers caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs can be very serious if they hemorrhage or perforate the stomach or duodenum. Up to 15% of people with ulcers experience some degree of bleeding, which can be life-threatening. Ulcers that form where the small intestine joins the stomach can swell and scar, resulting in a narrowing or closing of the intestinal opening. In such cases, the patient will vomit the entire contents of the stomach, and emergency treatment is necessary.

Complications of peptic ulcers cause an estimated 6,500 deaths each year. These figures, however, do not reflect the high number of deaths associated with NSAID use. Ulcers caused by NSAIDs are more likely to bleed than those caused by H. pylori. NSAID-related bleeding and stomach problems may be responsible for as many as 107,000 hospital admissions and 16,500 deaths each year.

Because there are usually no GI symptoms from NSAID ulcers until bleeding begins, doctors cannot predict which patients taking these drugs will develop bleeding. The risk for a poor outcome is highest in people who have had long-term bleeding from NSAIDs, blood clotting disorders, low systolic blood pressure, mental instability, or the presence of another serious, unstable medical condition. Populations at greatest risk are the elderly and those with other serious conditions, such as heart problems.

H. pylori is strongly associated with certain cancers. Some studies have also linked it to a number of non-gastrointestinal illnesses as well, although the evidence is inconsistent.

Stomach Cancers. Stomach cancer, also called gastric cancer, is the second most common cause of cancer worldwide. In developing countries where the rate of H. pylori is very high, the risk of stomach cancer is 6 times higher than in the U.S. An important 2001 study strongly supported previous work that found a causal link between H. pylori infection and stomach cancer. In this study, uninfected people did not develop stomach cancer. However, the stomach cancer rates for H. pylori-associated conditions were 4.7% for nonulcer dyspepsia, 3.4% for gastric ulcers, and 2.2% of stomach polyps. Experts now suggest that H. pylori may be as carcinogenic to the stomach as cigarette smoke is to the lungs.

Eradication of H. pylori may reduce the risk of stomach cancer, but not eliminate it. A Japanese study found that continued risk is associated with degree of mucosal atrophy before H. pylori eradication therapy is started. This is something than can be measured during an endoscopy.

The process most likely starts in childhood. Infection with H. pylori promotes a precancerous condition called atrophic gastritis. This may lead to cancer through the following steps:

The stomach becomes chronically inflamed and loses patches of glands that secrete protein and acid.
Acid protects against carcinogens, substances that cause cancerous changes in cells.
New cells replace destroyed cells, but the new cells do not produce enough acid to protect against carcinogens.
Over time, cancer cells may develop and proliferate in the stomach.

Onset of H. pylori infection in adulthood poses a lower risk, since the development of atrophic gastritis takes years, and an adult is likely to die of other causes first. Other factors, such as specific genetic strains and diets, might also influence a higher risk for stomach cancer. For example, a diet high in salt and low in fresh fruits and vegetables has been associated with a greater risk. Some evidence suggests that the virulent H. pylori strain called cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) may also be a particular risk factor for precancerous changes.

Interestingly, people with duodenal ulcers caused by H. pylori appear to have a lower risk of stomach cancer, although scientists do not know why. It may be that different H. pylori strains affect the duodenum and the stomach. Or, the high levels of acid found in the duodenum may help prevent the spread of the bacteria to critical areas of the stomach.

Pancreatic Cancer. H. pylori has recently been linked to pancreatic cancer. The excess risk is high in patients with unoperated gastric ulcers -- 20% after 15 years and 50% after the first hospitalization. Surgery decreased the risk dramatically. Unoperated duodenal ulcers, on the other hand, were not associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

Heart Disease. Some research has reported a very high rate of H. pylori infection in men with coronary artery disease, but more recent work has found no relationship between the bacteria and heart disease. A 2001 study suggested that the only relationship between H. pylori and heart disease may be that people with both tend to be in lower socioeconomic groups. Further studies are needed.

Other Diseases. H. pylori has also been weakly associated with other nonintestinal disorders, including migraine, Raynaud's disease (marked by cold extremities), and some skin disorders, such as chronic hives.

Risk Factors

About 25 million people in the U.S. are expected to develop peptic ulcers at some point in their lives. Peptic ulcer disease affects all age groups, but is rare in children. Men have twice the risk of ulcers as women. The risk of duodenal ulcers tends to rise beginning around age 25 and continues until age 75; gastric ulcers peak at age 55 - 65.

Peptic ulcers are less common than they once were. Research suggests that ulcer rates have even declined in areas with widespread H. pylori infection. The increased use of proton-pump inhibitor drugs may be responsible for this trend.

H. pylori grows and colonizes only in the intestinal tracts of primates. The bacteria are most likely transmitted directly from person to person. Still, little is yet known about its transmission.

Who Is Infected with H. pylori? About half the world's adults are infected with H. pylori. The bacteria are nearly always acquired during childhood and persist throughout life, if not treated. The prevalence in children ranges from less than 10% to more than 80%, with the highest infection rates (3 - 10%) in developing countries and the lowest (0.5%) in industrialized nations, where rates continue to decline. Even in industrialized countries, however, infection rates in regions with crowded, unsanitary conditions are equal to those in developing countries.

How Does the Bacteria Pass from Person to Person? It is not entirely clear how the bacteria are transmitted. One study did not find that infected students posed any risk for their classmates. Transmission within families may be the most important route for H. pylori. A 2002 study reported that spouses of people with peptic ulcers are at significantly higher risk for ulcers, suggesting that the bacteria may be transmitted during intimate contact. Some evidence suggests that bacteria may spread during GI tract illness, particularly when vomiting occurs. The bacteria also may be passed in stools. Since H. pylori can live in water, but not apparently in food, the bacteria may also be transmitting through sewage-contaminated water.

Who Is at Risk for Ulcers from H. pylori? Although H. pylori infection is common, ulcers in children are very rare, and only a minority of infected adults develops ulcers. Some known risk factors include smoking, alcohol use, having a relative with peptic ulcers, being male, and the presence of the cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA). Experts are unable to determine, however, any single factor or group of factors that can determine which infected patients are most likely to develop ulcers.

Between 15 - 25% of patients who have taken NSAIDs regularly will have evidence of one or more ulcers, but in most cases these ulcers are very small. Given the widespread use of NSAIDs, however, the potential total number of people who can develop serious problems may be very large. Long-term NSAID use can damage the stomach and, possibly, the small intestine.

In April 2005, the FDA asked manufacturers of prescription NSAIDs to include with their products the same boxed warning used for the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex). This boxed warning emphasizes the increased risk for cardiovascular events and GI bleeding in people taking these drugs. (Pharmaceutical companies are trying to develop new COX-2 inhibitors without these dangerous side effects. Early safety studies of the novel COX-2 inhibitor known as CS-706 showed its effect on gastric mucosa to be the same as placebo.)

The FDA also requested manufacturers of over-the-counter NSAIDs to revise their labels to include more specific language concerning potential cardiovascular and GI risks. Due to its proven heart benefits, aspirin was excluded from these labeling revisions.

Frequent Users of NSAIDs. Anyone who uses NSAIDs regularly is at risk for gastrointestinal problems. Even low-dose aspirin (81 mg) may pose some risk, although the risk is lower than with standard doses. In one 4-year study, 4.5% of regular NSAID users were hospitalized for GI bleeding. The highest risk, however, was found in people who require long-term use of very high-dose NSAIDs, notably patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Other people who take high doses of NSAIDs include those with chronic low back pain, fibromyalgia, and chronic stress.

Contributing Factors. Certain factors add to the risk for ulcers in NSAID-users:

Age 65 and older
History of peptic ulcers or upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Other serious ailments, such as congestive heart failure
Use of other medications, such as the anticoagulant warfarin (Coumadin), corticosteroids, or the osteoporosis drug alendronate (Fosamax)
Alcohol abuse
Those infected with H. pylori. A 2002 study reported that the combination of NSAID use and H. pylori posed a 3.5-fold greater risk of ulcers than either factor alone. However, not all studies have reported the higher risk in infected patients.

Stress and Psychological Factors. Although stress is no longer considered a cause of ulcers, studies still suggest that stress may predispose a person to ulcers or prevent existing ulcers from healing. Some experts estimate that social and psychological factors play a contributory role in 30 - 60% of peptic ulcer cases, whether they are caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs. Some experts even believe that the anecdotal relationship between stress and ulcers is so strong that treatment of psychological factors is warranted.

Smoking. Smoking increases acid secretion, reduces prostaglandin and bicarbonate production, and decreases mucosal blood flow. Results of studies on the actual effect of smoking on ulcers, however, are mixed. Some evidence suggests that smoking delays the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers. One study reported that after ulcers healed, about half of nonsmokers experienced a relapse of their ulcer disease after 1 year, but that all heavy smokers relapsed after 3 months. Other studies have found no increased risk for ulcers in smokers. In any case, any impact of smoking on ulcers does not seem to be affected by the presence of H. pylori.

Tobacco use and exposure may cause an acceleration of coronary artery disease and peptic ulcer disease. It is also linked to reproductive disturbances, esophageal reflux, hypertension, fetal illness and death, and delayed wound healing.

Diagnosis

Peptic ulcers are always suspected in patients with persistent dyspepsia (bloating, belching, and abdominal pain). Dyspepsia, however, occurs in 20 - 40% of people who live in industrialized nations, and only about 15 - 25% of these people actually have ulcers. A number of steps are needed to make an accurate diagnosis of ulcers.

The doctor will ask for a thorough report of a patient's dyspepsia and other important symptoms, such as weight loss or fatigue, present and past medication use (especially chronic use of NSAIDs), family members with ulcers, and drinking and smoking habits.

In addition to peptic ulcers, a number of conditions, notably gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and irritable bowel syndrome, cause dyspepsia. Often, however, no cause can be determined. In such cases, the symptoms are referred to collectively as functional dyspepsia.

Peptic ulcer symptoms, particularly abdominal pain and chest pain, may resemble those of other conditions, such as gallstones or heart attack. Certain features may help to distinguish these different conditions. However, symptoms often overlap, and it is impossible to make a diagnosis based on symptoms alone. A number of tests are needed.

The following disorders may be confused with peptic ulcers:

GERD. About half of patients with GERD also have dyspepsia. With GERD or other problems in the esophagus, the main symptom is usually heartburn, a burning pain that radiates up to the throat. It typically develops after meals and is relieved by antacids. The patient may have difficulty swallowing and may experience regurgitation or acid reflux. Elderly patients with GERD are less likely to have these symptoms, but instead may experience loss of appetite, weight loss, anemia, vomiting, or dysphagia (difficulty or painful swallowing). [See In-Depth Report #85: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.]
Heart Events. Cardiac pain, such as angina or a heart attack, is more likely to occur with exercise and may radiate to the neck, jaw, or arms. In addition, patients typically have distinct risk factors for heart disease, such as a family history, smoking, high blood pressure, obesity, or high cholesterol. [See In-Depth Report #12: Heart Attack.]
Gallstones. The primary symptom in gallstones is typically a steady gripping or gnawing pain on the right side under the rib cage, which can be quite severe and can radiate to the upper back. Some patients experience pain behind the breastbone. The pain is often precipitated by a fatty or heavy meal, but gallstones almost never cause dyspepsia. [See In-Depth Report #10: Gallstones and Gallbladder Disease.]
Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Irritable bowel syndrome can cause dyspepsia, nausea and vomiting, bloating, and abdominal pain. It occurs more often in women than in men.

Dyspepsia may also occur with gastritis, stomach cancer, or as a side effect of certain drugs, including NSAIDs, antibiotics, iron, corticosteroids, theophylline, and calcium blockers.

When ulcers are suspected, the doctor will prescribe tests to detect bleeding. These may include a rectal exam, a complete blood count, and a fecal occult blood test (FOBT). The FOBT tests for hidden (occult) blood in stools. Typically, the patient is asked to supply up to 6 stool specimens in a specially prepared package. A small quantity of feces is smeared on treated paper, which reacts to hydrogen peroxide. If blood is present, the paper turns blue.

Traditional radiology tests have not yet proven valuable for diagnosing ulcers. However, radiologists in France who performed multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans on preoperative patients with proven GI perforations found the technology to be highly accurate in pinpointing the location of the perforations.

Simple blood, breath, and stool tests can now detect H. pylori with a fairly high degree of accuracy. It is not entirely clear, however, which individuals should be screened for H. pylori.

Candidates for Screening. Some doctors currently test for H. pylori only in individuals with dyspepsia who also have high-risk conditions, such as:

Strong indication for ulcers, such as weight loss, anemia, or indications of bleeding
History of active ulcers
Risk factors for stomach cancer or other complications from ulcers

Smokers and those who experience regular and persistent pain on an empty stomach may also be good candidates for screening tests. Some doctors argue that testing for H. pylori may be beneficial for patients with dyspepsia who are regular NSAID users. In fact, given the possible risk for stomach cancer in H. pylori- infected people with dyspepsia, some experts now recommend that any patient with dyspepsia lasting longer than 4 weeks should have a blood test for H. pylori. This is a subject of considerable debate, however.

Specific Screening Tests for H. pylori. The following screening tests used or under investigation for H. pylori:

Breath Test. A simple test called the carbon isotope-urea breath test (UBT) can identify up to 99% of people who harbor H. pylori. Up to 2 weeks before the test, the patient must discontinue taking any antibiotics, bismuth-containing agents such as Pepto-Bismol, and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). As part of the test, the patient swallows a special substance containing urea (a compound in mammals metabolized from nitrogen) that has been treated with carbon atoms. If H. pylori is present, the bacteria convert the urea into carbon dioxide, which is detected and recorded in the patient's exhaled breath after 10 minutes.
Blood Tests. Blood tests are used to measure antibodies to H. pylori, with results available in minutes. Diagnostic accuracy is reported at 80 - 90%. One such important test is called enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An ELISA test of the urine is also showing promise in children.
Stool Test. A test to detect genetic fingerprints of H. pylori in the feces appears to be as accurate as the breath test for initial detection of the bacteria and for detecting recurrences after antibiotic therapy.

It should be noted that such tests are not as accurate as endoscopy, an invasive procedure, which is needed to confirm a diagnosis of H. pylori. The breath and stool tests, however, can be particularly useful after treatment to determine if a patient has been cured.

Test and Treat. Depending on the results of the screening tests, some doctors take the following steps:

Approach for Noninfected Individuals. People who do not have evidence of H. pylori on a blood or breath test are typically given a 4-week course of acid-suppressing medication, usually a PPI such as omeprazole (Prilosec).
Approach for H. pylori-Infected Individuals. Patients with evidence of bacterial infection are given antibiotics. If this does not relieve symptoms, they are given a 6-week course of the PPI omeprazole (Prilosec). (Whether to give antibiotics to infected patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia is controversial and is discussed in the section, What Are the Guidelines for Treating Peptic Ulcers Caused by H. pylori?)

If symptoms persist, endoscopy is usually performed. Endoscopy is an invasive procedure, but is the only procedure in which a biopsy of stomach tissue can be taken, making it the most accurate test.

Experts debate whether endoscopy should be performed on all patients who do not respond to initial medication, since it does not appear to add any useful information on treatment choices, unless there is evidence or suspicion of bleeding or serious complications.

While endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing upper GI disorders, because it allows doctors to biopsy the stomach, 3-dimensional CT imaging may also be valuable. Researchers in China compared the results of endoscopy to the results of noninvasive CT imaging performed to diagnose GI disease. They found that the CT imaging correctly diagnosed 50 of 52 cases, including 5 cases of peptic ulcer disease. Three-dimensional CT imaging clearly showed the GI tract lesions. It is currently considered a valuable complement to endoscopy.

Endoscopy is a procedure used to evaluate the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum using a long, thin tube tipped with a tiny video camera (endoscope). When combined with biopsy, endoscopy is the most accurate procedure for detecting the presence of peptic ulcers, bleeding, and stomach cancer, or for confirming the presence of H. pylori.

Appropriate Candidates for Endoscopy. Because endoscopy is invasive and expensive, it is unsuitable for screening everyone with dyspepsia. Most individuals with these symptoms are managed effectively without endoscopy. Endoscopy is usually reserved for patients with dyspepsia who also have risk factors for ulcers, stomach cancer, or both. Such factors include the following:

Having so-called "alarm" symptoms (unexplained weight loss, gastrointestinal bleeding, vomiting, difficulty swallowing, or anemia).
Being over 45 (when the risk for stomach cancer increases).

There is some debate whether patients under 45 with persistent dyspepsia and no alarm symptoms should have endoscopy.

The Procedure. Endoscopy may be performed in a hospital, doctor's office, or outpatient surgery center, and typically involves the following:

The doctor administers a local anesthetic using an oral spray and an intravenous sedative to suppress the gag reflex and relax the patient.
The doctor then places the thin, flexible plastic tube into the patient's mouth and down the esophagus into the stomach.
A tiny camera in the endoscope allows the doctor to see the surface of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, and to search for abnormalities.
The doctor will remove about 10 small tissue samples (biopsies), which will be tested for H. pylori.

In endoscopy, the doctor places a long, thin, flexible tube (called an endoscope) down the patient's throat and into the stomach and duodenum. A camera and light on the tip of the endoscope enables the doctor to check for abnormalities. Tiny samples may be taken to check for H. pylori bacteria, a cause of many peptic ulcers. If a bleeding ulcer is found, it may be sealed with a burning tool (cauterized) during the procedure.

Note: Some evidence suggests that patients who take PPIs should stop taking the medication 2 weeks before an endoscopy, since it may mask ulcers.

Capsule Endoscopy.Capsule endoscopy involves swallowing a capsule the size of a large vitamin, which contains tiny camera, light source, and radio transmitter. The device takes pictures as it passes through the intestinal tract. At this point, its benefits are limited to the small intestine, so it is unlikely to play a role in the diagnosis of peptic or gastric ulcers. However, capsule endoscopy has the potential to be an important tool for the diagnosis of obscure upper GI bleeding. Patients who have used it have usually found it painless and preferable to conventional endoscopy.

An upper GI (gastrointestinal) series was the standard diagnostic method for peptic ulcers until the introduction of adequate tests for detecting H. pylori. In an upper GI series, the patient drinks a solution containing barium. X-rays are then taken, which may reveal inflammation, active ulcer craters, or deformities and scarring due to previous ulcers. Endoscopy is more accurate, although it is more invasive and expensive.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing treatment of GI bleeding.

Stool tests may show traces of blood that are not visible to the naked eye, and blood tests may reveal anemia in those who have bleeding ulcers. If Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is suspected, blood levels of gastrin should be measured.

Treatment

Antibiotic regimens that eradicate H. pylori can cure peptic ulcers and are now the standard medications used for ulcers in infected individuals who are not taking NSAIDs. Eliminating H. pylori can also cure the rare MALT lymphomas caused by this bacterium. Other drugs, such as proton-pump inhibitors or H2 blockers, are useful for relieving ulcer symptoms.

Patients with Clear Evidence of Ulcers. Antibiotics are clearly indicated for patients who have both ulcers and H. pylori infection. Despite such clear indications, however, European and American studies continue to suggest that many doctors only treat symptoms and not the ulcers themselves. Studies also suggest that most doctors do not counsel patients on the potential dangers of NSAIDs and other drugs that can cause ulcers.

There is considerable debate about whether to test for H. pylori and treat infected patients who have dyspepsia, but no evidence of ulcers.

The best approach for treating dyspepsia is highly controversial. Options include the following:

Test and Treat. This approach involves testing for H. pylori and eradicating the bacteria in infected patients.
Prescribing potent acid-suppressing agents. This approach generally employs a trial of potent acid-suppressing drugs called proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as omeprazole (Prilosec) or esomeprazole (Nexium).

In either case, endoscopy is usually performed if symptoms persist after 4 weeks. Some evidence suggests that PPIs may mask ulcers, so patients taking these drugs may need to discontinue them for 2 weeks before endoscopy.

Arguments for Testing and Treating Patients with Dyspepsia. The argument supporting testing and treating patients with nonulcer dyspepsia is as follows:

Protection against ulcers. Some evidence suggests that antibiotic treatments for infected patients with dyspepsia may prevent ulcers from developing. A 2002 study found that antibiotic regimens to eradicate H. pylori greatly decreased the likelihood of ulcers in infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia who were chronic NSAID users.
Protection against gastric cancer. Some evidence suggests that eradicating H. pylori may prevent or delay the onset of stomach cancer in people with long-term dyspepsia who are infected with the bacteria. A large 2001 study conducted in Japan, where gastric cancer is especially common, found that such cancers developed in about 3% of infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. However, none occurred in dyspeptic patients who were treated with antibiotics for H. pylori.

Arguments against Testing and Treating Patients with Dyspepsia. The arguments against testing and treating are as follows:

Lack of significant effect on symptoms. Studies are mixed on whether antibiotics have much effect on dyspepsia symptoms. In a 2003 study, overall symptom scores after 1 year were not significantly different between dyspeptic patients who were treated for H. pylori and patients who were maintained on PPIs.
Lower rates of H. pylori in the U.S. The number of people with H. pylori infection is declining in the U.S., possibly making the test-and-treat approach too expensive for the number of people it helps.
Increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A number of studies suggest that H. pylori in the intestinal tract protects against GERD, which in severe cases can be a risk factor for cancer of the esophagus. Eliminating H. pylori may also have other adverse effects.
Overuse of antibiotics. Concern that such treatments without clear evidence of ulcers will lead to unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, increasing the risk for side effects. Overuse may also contribute to a growing public health problem -- the emergence of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics.

The standard treatment regimen for H. pylori uses 2 antibiotics and a PPI. Cure rates after antibiotic treatment range from 70 - 90%. A typical regimen contains three drugs:

A PPI. These drugs include omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), esomeprazole (Nexium), and rabeprazole (Aciphex). PPIs are important for all types of peptic ulcers, and are a critical partner in antibiotic regimens. They reduce acidity in the intestinal tract, and increase the ability of antibiotics to destroy H. pylori.
Two antibiotics. The standard antibiotics are clarithromycin (Biaxin) and amoxicillin. Some doctors substitute the antibiotic metronidazole (Flagyl) for either clarithromycin or amoxicillin.

This combination treatment is typically taken for at least 14 days. Many studies, however, suggest that a 7-day treatment may work just as well. A report published in 2006 evaluated a shorter course of treatment using the PPI rabeprazole and 2 antibiotics. They found that a 4-day treatment eliminated H. pylori and was associated with fewer side effects. A study published in 2007 comparing 1- and 2-week treatments with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and omeprazole for H. pylori eradication found both regimens to be similar in efficacy, safety, and compliance.

Interestingly, an Italian study indicated that giving antibiotics sequentially instead of at the same time may be even more effective. The researchers found that patients who took amoxicillin for 5 days, followed by clarithromycin for 5 days, had higher H. pylori eradication rates (89%) than those who took both antibiotics for 10 days (77%).

A 2007 study showed that eradication rates with this 3-drug regimen could be improved, and side effects reduced, by adding probiotics ("good" bacteria) and the milk protein bovine lactoferrin. These products are often found in yogurts and other forms of fermented milk.

Follow-Up. Follow-up testing for the bacteria should be done no sooner than 4 weeks after therapy is completed. Test results before that time may not be accurate.

In most cases, drug treatment relieves ulcer symptoms. However, symptom relief does not always indicate success, nor does persistence of dyspepsia necessarily mean that treatment has failed. Heartburn and other symptoms from GERD, for example, can worsen and require acid-suppressing medication.

Failure. Treatment fails in about 15% of patients, mostly when they fail to adhere to the regimen. Compliance with standard antibiotic regimens may be poor for the following reasons:

The triple-drug regimens are complicated and require many pills. Helicide or two-drug combinations may help offset this problem.
About 30% of patients suffer side effects from the H. pylori regimen. Gastrointestinal problems are very common, and severe diarrhea can occur.

Treatment may also fail if the patients harbor strains of H. pylori that are resistant to the antibiotics. When this happens, different drugs are tried.

Reinfection after Successful Treatment. Studies in developed countries indicate that once the bacteria are eliminated, recurrence rates are below 1% per year. Reinfection with the bacteria is possible, however, in areas where the incidence of H. pylori is very high and sanitary conditions are poor. In such regions, reinfection rates are 6 - 15%.

Weight Gain. Some patients may gain weight.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Of ongoing interest are reports of a lower incidence of H. pylori in patients with GERD. There are some important unanswered questions associated with this issue:

Is the lower incidence of H. pylori in GERD patients significant, and does the bacteria actually protect against GERD? Studies have not conclusively found any significant risk for GERD in people who are not infected with H. pylori, except possibly in certain regions. In a 2003 study, the absence of H. pylori infection in people with GERD was more pronounced in Asian patients than in those from Europe and North America. That being said, guidelines for eradication of H. pylori infection published in 2007 by the European Helicobacter Study Group state that "Eradication of H. pylori infection does not cause gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or exacerbate GERD, and may prevent peptic ulcer in patients who are naive users of NSAIDs."
Does eliminating the bacteria with antibiotic therapy actually produce GERD in some people? One study observed that patients cured of H. pylori infection were twice as likely to develop GERD as those who remained infected. However, a 2003 analysis of 8 studies reported no higher risk for GERD after antibiotic treatments. In addition, GERD patients did not experience worsening of symptoms. Longer follow-up studies are needed however to determine the long-term consequences, if any.
What is the proper management of people who have GERD and H. pylori infection? Patients with severe GERD usually require on-going therapy with PPIs, which are powerful acid-suppressors. Some evidence suggests that in such patients, the combination of H. pylori and chronic acid suppression may lead to atrophic gastritis, a precancerous condition in the stomach. Guidelines then advocate eliminating the bacteria with antibiotics. There is some concern that once the bacteria are eliminated, however, GERD may worsen, which can pose a risk for Barrett's esophagus, which is also a precancerous condition. On the encouraging side, however, evidence to date does not suggest any higher risk for more serious GERD complications after H. pylori is eliminated.

Effects on Other Gastrointestinal Infections. In children, there is some evidence that H. pylori protects against E. coli and other GI infections, particularly those that cause diarrhea. If this is true, treating infected children for H. pylori should be done only if the bacteria are causing harm.

Click the icon to see an animation on ulcer treatment.

Treatment for NSAID-Induced Ulcers

Preventing Ulcers or Rebleeding Caused by NSAIDs. If NSAID-caused ulcers or bleeding are identified, patients should:

Get tested for H. pylori and, if they are infected, take antibiotics.
Possibly use a PPI. Studies suggest these medications lower the risk for NSAID-caused ulcers, although they do not completely prevent them.

People who still need to take NSAIDs should:

Use the lowest NSAID dose possible.
Try the prescription drugs misoprostol (Cytotec) or Arthrotec. Misoprostol works as well as a PPI, however, it has many side effects. Arthrotec is a combination of misoprostol and the NSAID diclofenac.

A warning to women: misoprostol can induce labor at any stage of pregnancy. Pregnant women should not use the drug.

Healing Existing Ulcers. A number of drugs are used to treat NSAID-caused ulcers. PPIs -- omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), or esomeprazole (Nexium) -- are used most often. Other drugs that may be useful include H2 blockers, such as famotidine (Pepcid AC), cimetidine (Tagamet), and ranitidine (Zantac). Sucralfate is another drug used to heal ulcers and reduce the stomach upset caused by NSAIDs.

COX-2 Inhibitors (Coxibs). Coxibs block an inflammation-promoting enzyme called COX-2. This drug class was initially thought to work as well as NSAIDs, while causing less gastrointestinal distress. However, following numerous reports of cardiovascular events, the FDA banned rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) from use in the U.S. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is still available, but patients should discuss with their doctor whether this drug is appropriate and safe for them.

Arthrotec. Arthrotec is a combination of misoprostol and the NSAID diclofenac. It may reduce the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. One study found that patients taking Arthrotec had 65 - 80% fewer ulcers than those who took NSAIDs alone.

Acetaminophen. Acetaminophen (Tylenol, Anacin-3) is the most common alternative to NSAIDs. Acetaminophen is inexpensive and generally safe. It poses far less of a risk of gastrointestinal problems than NSAIDs. It does have some adverse effects, however, and the daily dose should not exceed 4 grams (4,000 mg); some studies suggest that ulcer risk is increased even in doses exceeding 2 grams (2,000 mg) a day, if the drug is used on a long-term basis. Patients who take high doses of acetaminophen for long periods are also at risk for liver damage, particularly if they drink alcohol. It may pose a small risk for serious kidney complications in people with preexisting kidney disease, although acetaminophen remains the drug of choice for patients with impaired kidney function.

Tramadol. Tramadol (Ultram) is a pain reliever that has been used as an alternative to opioids. It has opioid-like properties, but is not as addictive. However, dependence and abuse have been reported. It can cause nausea, but does not cause severe gastrointestinal problems, as NSAIDs can. Some patients experience severe itching. A combination of tramadol and acetaminophen (Ultracet) provides more rapid pain relief than tramadol alone and more durable relief than acetaminophen alone. Side effects are the same as for each of these agents.

Medications

The following drugs are sometimes used in the treatments of peptic ulcers caused by either NSAIDs or H. pylori. They are described in alphabetical order.

Many antacids are available without prescription and are the first drugs recommended to relieve heartburn and mild dyspepsia. They play no major role in either the prevention or healing of ulcers, but help in the following ways:

All rely on various combinations of three basic compounds -- magnesium, calcium, or aluminum -- to neutralize stomach acid.
They may defend the stomach by increasing acid-buffering bicarbonate and mucus secretion.

It is generally believed that liquid antacids work faster and are more potent than tablets, although some evidence suggests that both forms work equally well.

Basic Salts Used in Antacids. There are three basic salts used in antacids:

Magnesium. Magnesium compounds are available in the form of magnesium carbonate, magnesium trisilicate, and, most commonly, magnesium hydroxide (Milk of Magnesia). The major side effect of these magnesium compounds is diarrhea.
Calcium. Calcium carbonate (Tums, Titralac, and Alka-2) is a potent and rapid-acting antacid, but it can cause constipation. There have been rare cases of hypercalcemia (elevated levels of calcium in the blood) in people taking calcium carbonate for long periods of time. Hypercalcemia can lead to kidney failure.
Aluminum. The most common side effect of antacids containing aluminum compounds (Amphogel, Alternagel) is constipation. Maalox and Mylanta are combinations of aluminum and magnesium, which balance the side effects of diarrhea and constipation. People who take large amounts of antacids containing aluminum may be at risk for calcium loss and osteoporosis. Long-term use also increases the risk of kidney stones. People who have recently experienced GI bleeding should not use aluminum compounds.

Interactions with Other Drugs. Antacids can reduce the absorption of a number of drugs. Conversely, some antacids increase the potency of certain drugs. The interactions can be avoided by taking these other drugs 1 hour before or 3 hours after taking the antacid.

Drugs that are absorbed less well if taken with antacids

Drugs that are made more potent by antacids

Tetracycline

Ciprofloxacin (Cipro)

Propranolol (Inderal)

Captopril (Capoten)

Ranitidine (Zantac)

Famotidine (Pepcid AC)

Valproic acid

Sulfonylureas

Quinidine

Levodopa

H. pylori is usually highly sensitive to certain antibiotics, particularly amoxicillin, and to antibiotics in the macrolide class, such as clarithromycin. Either type of agent serves effectively as a second antibiotic in a three-drug regimen. Other antibiotics that are sometimes used include tetracycline, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin.

Amoxicillin is the most common form of penicillin. It is inexpensive, but many people are allergic to it.
Clarithromycin (Biaxin) is a macrolide and is the most expensive antibiotic used against H. pylori. It is very effective, but there is growing bacterial resistance to this drug. Resistance rates tend to be higher in women and increase with age. Researchers fear that resistance will increase as more people use the drug.
Tetracycline is effective, but this medicine has unique side effects, including skin reactions to sunlight, possible burning in the throat, and tooth discoloration. Pregnant women cannot take tetracycline.
Ciprofloxacin (Cipro), a fluoroquinolone, is also sometimes used in ulcer regimens.
Metronidazole (Flagyl) was the mainstay in initial combination regimens for H. pylori. As with clarithromycin, however, there continues to be growing bacterial resistance to the drug. Today, about 25 - 35% of H. pylori bacteria are metronidazole-resistant.

Side Effects of Antibiotics.

The most common side effects of nearly all antibiotics are gastrointestinal problems such as cramps, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Allergic reactions can also occur with all antibiotics, but are most common with medications derived from penicillin or sulfa. These reactions can range from mild skin rashes to rare, but severe -- even life-threatening -- anaphylactic shock.
Some drugs, including certain over-the-counter medications, interact with antibiotics; patients should report to all medications they are taking to their doctor.
Antibiotics double the risk of vaginal infections in women.

Compounds that contain bismuth are often used in the three-drug antibiotic regimens. They destroy the cell walls of H. pylori bacteria. The only bismuth compound available in the U.S. has been bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol), although a drug combination of the H2 blocker ranitidine and bismuth citrate (Tritec) has been released. High doses can cause vomiting and depression of the central nervous system, but the doses given for ulcer patients rarely cause side effects.

H2 blockers interfere with acid production by blocking histamine, a substance produced by the body that encourages acid secretion in the stomach. H2 blockers were the standard treatment for peptic ulcers until antibiotic regimens against H. pylori were developed. These drugs cannot cure ulcers, but they are useful in certain cases. They are effective only for duodenal ulcers, however.

Four H2 blockers are currently available over-the-counter in the U.S.: famotidine (Pepcid AC), cimetidine (Tagamet), ranitidine (Zantac), and nizatidine (Axid). All have good safety profiles and few side effects. There are some differences between these drugs:

Famotidine (Pepcid AC). Famotidine is the most potent H2 blocker. The most common side effect is headache, which occurs in 4. 7% of people who take it. Famotidine is virtually free of drug interactions, but it may have significant adverse effects in patients with kidney problems.
Cimetidine (Tagamet). Cimetidine has few side effects; about 1% of people taking cimetidine experience mild temporary diarrhea, dizziness, rash, or headache. Cimetidine interacts with a number of commonly used medications, including phenytoin, theophylline, and warfarin. Long-term use of excessive doses (more than 3 grams a day) may cause impotence or breast enlargement in men. These problems resolve after the drug is discontinued.
Ranitidine (Zantac). Ranitidine interacts with very few drugs. In one study, ranitidine provided more pain relief and healed ulcers more quickly than cimetidine in people younger than age 60, but there was no difference in older patients. A common side effect of ranitidine is headache, which occurs in about 3% of people who take it.

That being said, a literature review of clinical trials showed that the PPIs are more effective than the H2 blockers in healing ulcers in people who take NSAIDs. After 8 weeks of treatment, healing rates of both gastric and duodenal ulcers were:

92% and 88% with esomeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg (vs 74% with ranitidine).
87% and 84% with omeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg (vs 64% with ranitidine).
And 73 - 74% and 66 - 69% with lansoprazole 30 mg and 15 mg (vs 50 - 53% with ranitidine).
However, healing rates with ranitidine reached nearly 100% when NSAIDs were discontinued.

Nizatidine (Axid). Nizatidine is nearly free of side effects and drug interactions.

Long-Term Concerns. In most cases, these H2 blockers have good safety profiles and few side effects. Because H2 blockers can interact with other drugs, be sure to tell your doctor about any other drugs you are taking. There are also some concerns about possible long-term effects -- for example, that long-term acid suppression with these drugs may cause cancerous changes in the stomach in patients who also have untreated H. pylori infection. More research is needed. However, the following concerns are real:

Liver damage. This is more likely with ranitidine than other H2 blockers, but is rare in any event.
Kidney-related complications. With famotidine, adverse effects on the central nervous system in patients with even moderate kidney insufficiency have been reported, resulting in anxiety, depression, and mental disturbances.
Increased risk for pneumonia in hospitalized patients.
Ulcer perforation and bleeding. Some experts are concerned that the use of acid-blocking drugs may actually increase the risk for serious complications by masking the ulcer's symptoms.

Misoprostol (Cytotec) increases prostaglandin levels in the stomach lining, which protects against the major intestinal toxicity of NSAIDs.

Actions against Ulcers. Misoprostol can reduce formation of ulcers in the upper small intestine by two-thirds and in the stomach by three-fourths. It does not neutralize or reduce acid, so although the drug is helpful for preventing NSAID-induced ulcers, it is not useful in healing existing ulcers.

Side Effects.

Diarrhea and other gastrointestinal problems are severe enough to cause 20% of patients to stop taking the drug. Taking misoprostol after meals should minimize these effects. One study indicated that taking the drug 2 - 3 times a day, instead of the standard regimen of 4 times, may prove to be just as effective and cause fewer side effects.
Misoprostol can induce abortion or cause birth defects and should not be taken by pregnant women. If pregnancy occurs during treatment, the drug should be discontinued at once and the doctor contacted immediately.

Actions against Ulcers. PPIs are the drugs of choice for managing patients with peptic ulcers from any cause. They suppress the production of stomach acid by blocking the gastric acid pump -- the molecule in the stomach glands that is responsible for acid secretion.

PPIs can be used either as part of a multidrug regimen for H. pylori or alone for preventing and healing NSAID-caused ulcers. One retrospective study found that adding a PPI to diclofenac therapy reduced hospitalization for ulcers by 60%. They are also useful in treating ulcers caused by Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Some people carry a gene that reduces the effectiveness of PPIs. This gene is present in 18 - 20% of people of Asian descent.

Standard Brands. Most PPIs are available by prescription as oral drugs. There is no evidence that one brand of PPI works better than another. Brands approved for ulcer prevention and treatment include:

Omeprazole (generic, Prilosec OTC)
Esomeprazole (Nexium)
Lansoprazole (Prevacid)
Rabeprazole (Aciphex)

Possible Adverse Effects.

Side effects are uncommon, but may include headache, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and itching.
Pregnant women and nursing mothers should avoid taking PPIs, although recent studies suggest that these drugs do not increase the risk of birth defects.
PPIs may interact with certain drugs, such as antiseizure agents (such as phenytoin), antianxiety drugs (such as diazepam), and blood thinners (such as warfarin).
Long-term use of high-dose PPIs may produce vitamin B12 deficiency, but studies are needed to confirm this risk.
In theory, long-term use of PPIs by people with H. pylori may reduce acid secretion enough to cause atrophic gastritis (chronic inflammation of the stomach), a risk factor for stomach cancer. Long-term use of PPIs may also mask symptoms of stomach cancer and delay diagnosis. At this time, however, there have been no reports of an increase in stomach cancer with long-term use of these drugs.

Sucralfate (Carafate) seems to work by adhering to the ulcer crater and protecting it from further damage by stomach acid and pepsin. It also promotes the defensive processes of the stomach. Sucralfate has an ulcer-healing rate similar to that of H2 blockers. Other than constipation, which occurs in 2.2% of patients, the drug has few side effects. Sucralfate does interact with a wide variety of drugs, however, including warfarin, phenytoin, and tetracycline.

Treatment for Bleeding Ulcers

When a patient comes to the hospital with bleeding ulcers, endoscopy is usually performed. This procedure is critical for the diagnosis, determination of treatment options, and treatment of bleeding ulcers.

In high-risk patients or those with evidence of bleeding, options include watchful waiting with medical treatments or surgery. The first critical steps for massive bleeding are to stabilize the patient and support vital functions with fluid replacement and possibly blood transfusions. People on NSAIDs should discontinue them, if possible.

Depending on the intensity of the bleeding, patients can be released from the hospital within a day or kept up to 3 days after endoscopy. Bleeding stops spontaneously in about 70 - 80% of patients, but about 30% of patients who come to the hospital for bleeding ulcers need surgery. Endoscopy is the surgical procedure most often used for treating bleeding ulcers and patients at high-risk for rebleeding. It is usually combined with medications, such as epinephrine and intravenous proton-pump inhibitors.

Between 10 - 20% of patients require more invasive procedures for bleeding, usually major abdominal surgery.

Endoscopy is important for both diagnosing and treating bleeding ulcers. The doctor first places a thin, flexible plastic tube called an endoscope into the patient's mouth and down the esophagus into the stomach.

Endoscopy for Diagnosing Bleeding Ulcers and Determining Risk of Rebleeding. With endoscopy, doctors are able to detect the signs of bleeding, such as active spurting or oozing of blood from arteries. Endoscopy can also detect specific features in the ulcers referred to as stigmata, which indicate a higher or lower risk of rebleeding.

Such features include the following:

Low risk (5 -15%) for bleeding: flat dot; a clean or white base.
High risk (30 - 50%) for bleeding: swollen but nonbleeding blood vessels; blood clots that adhere to ulcers.
According to one study, if patients with these high-risk features are untreated, their risk for rebleeding after endoscopy ranges from about 10% on the first day after endoscopy to about 3% by the third day. Identifying and treating patients with stigmata can reduce these risks. Other factors that increase the risk for rebleeding include bleeding disorders, very low blood pressure, other serious medical conditions, and bleeding that started after hospitalization.
After endoscopy, high-dose PPI therapy has been shown to significantly reduce the rate of rebleeding, need for surgery, and death from hemorrhage. The medication may be given intravenously, but studies show that oral PPI therapy is probably just as effective.

Endoscopy as Treatment. Endoscopy is usually used to treat bleeding from visible vessels that are less than 2 mm in diameter. This approach also appears to be very effective in preventing rebleeding in patients whose ulcers are not bleeding, but who have high-risk features (swollen blood vessels or clots adhering to ulcers).

The following is a typical endoscopy procedure:

The surgeon passes a probe through an endoscopic tube and applies electricity, heat, or small clips to coagulate the blood and stop the bleeding. This procedure also causes fluid buildup, which helps to compress the blood vessels.
In high-risk cases, the doctor may inject epinephrine (commonly known as adrenaline) directly into the ulcer to enhance the effects of the heating process. Epinephrine activates the process leading to blood coagulation, narrows the arteries, and enhances blood clotting.
Intravenous (IV) administration of a PPI (usually omeprazole or pantoprazole) significantly prevents rebleeding and appears to be cost-effective. In one study, the use of IV PPIs reduced the risk of bleeding from 23% to 7%. (Oral PPIs are also effective, but studies are needed to compare their effectiveness versus IV PPIs.) A PPI may also be useful for initial bleeding episodes when endoscopy is unsuccessful, inappropriate, or unavailable.

Intravenous H2 blockers are often used, but a major analysis reported no benefit in bleeding duodenal ulcers, although they may be effective in gastric ulcers.

Endoscopy is effective in controlling bleeding in more than 85% of appropriate candidates. If rebleeding occurs, a repeat endoscopy is effective in about 75% of patients. Those who fail to respond require major abdominal surgery. The most serious complication from endoscopy is perforation of the stomach or intestinal wall, which occurred in about 1.4% of patients in a large 2002 study.

While endoscopy and clipping are routine treatment for bleeding ulcers in the U.S., a Korean study found little difference in outcomes between clipping (plus H2 therapy) and oral PPI therapy alone. In a randomized test of 129 patients, hemostasis (end of bleeding) was achieved in 93.5% of patients after clipping and 92.5% of patients on oral PPIs at 24 hours. The rate of rebleeding was 6.9% with clipping and 7.5% with PPIs.

Other Medical Considerations. Certain agents may be warranted after endoscopy:

Patients who harbor the H. pylori bacteria, even when the bleeding has been caused by NSAID use, should be treated with antibiotic therapy to eliminate the bacteria. Triple therapy, including antibiotics, to eliminate H. pylori immediately after endoscopy is warranted in most patients infected with the bacteria.
Somatostatin (a hormone used to prevent bleeding in cirrhosis) is also useful for reducing persistent peptic ulcer bleeding or the risk of recurrence. Researchers are investigating adding other therapies, such as fibrin glue, a blood clotting factor. To date, no therapy has proven to be more effective than current treatments.

Major abdominal surgery for bleeding ulcers is now generally performed only when endoscopy fails or is not appropriate. Certain emergencies may require surgical repair, such as when an ulcer perforates the wall of the stomach or intestine, causing sudden intense pain and life-threatening infection.

Surgical Approaches. The standard major surgical approach uses a wide abdominal incision and standard surgical instruments (called open surgery). Laparoscopic techniques employ small abdominal incisions and the insertion of tubes that contain miniature cameras and instruments. Laparoscopic techniques are increasingly being used for perforated ulcers. Surgery is not effective for upper GI ulceration caused by chronic NSAID use.

Major Surgical Procedures. There are a number of surgical procedures aimed at long-term relief of ulcer complications. These include:

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a gastrectomy procedure.

Vagotomy, in which the vagus nerve is cut to interrupt messages from the brain that stimulate acid secretion in the stomach. This surgery may impair stomach emptying. A recent variation that cuts only parts of the nerve may reduce this complication.
Antrectomy, in which the lower part of the stomach is removed. This part manufactures the hormone responsible for stimulation of digestive juices.
Pyloroplasty, which enlarges the opening into the small intestine so that stomach contents can pass into it more easily.

Antrectomy and pyloroplasty are usually performed with vagotomy.

Lifestyle Changes

In the past, it was common practice to tell people suffering from peptic ulcers to consume small, frequent amounts of bland foods. Exhaustive research conducted since that time has shown that a bland diet is not effective in reducing the incidence or recurrence of ulcers, and that eating numerous small meals throughout the day is no more effective than eating three meals a day. Large amounts of food should still be avoided, because stretching the stomach can result in painful symptoms.

Fruits and Vegetables. The good news is that a diet rich in fiber may cut the risk of developing ulcers in half and speed healing of existing ulcers. Fiber found in fruits and vegetables is particularly protective; vitamin A contained in many of these foods may increase the benefit. Some studies on associations between specific food chemicals and ulcers are as follows:

In one study, apples and yams appeared to be especially helpful.
Apples, celery, cranberries, onions, red wine, and green and black tea are also high in natural chemicals known as flavonoids, which appear to inhibit H. pylori growth and have many other health benefits. Cranberry juice specifically may have properties that help prevent H. pylori from infecting the intestinal lining.
Grapefruit has antioxidant properties that may help heal ulcers.
Studies on rats have found that dietary nitrate increases nitric oxide in the gut and causes the mucus layer to thicken. Pretreatment with nitrate provided dramatic protection against diclofenac-induced ulcers. High levels of dietary nitrate are found in many vegetables.
Laboratory experiments suggest that sulforaphone, a compound found in broccoli and broccoli sprouts, may be lethal to even drug-resistant strains of H. pylori.
Tea has chemicals that may help protect against cancers in the stomach and esophagus.

Milk. Milk actually encourages the production of acid in the stomach, although moderate amounts (2 - 3 cups a day) appear to do no harm. Animal studies show that a milk protein called bovine alpha-lactalbumin protects against gastric ulcers caused by stress. Certain probiotics, which are "good" bacteria added to yogurt and other fermented milk drinks, may also have gastric protective qualities.

Coffee and Carbonated Beverages. Coffee (both caffeinated and decaffeinated), soft drinks, and fruit juices with citric acid increase stomach acid production. Although no studies have proven that any of these drinks contribute to ulcers, consuming more than 3 cups of coffee per day may increase susceptibility to H. pylori infection.

Spices and Peppers. Studies conducted on spices and peppers have yielded conflicting results. The rule of thumb is to use these substances moderately, and to avoid them if they irritate the stomach.

Garlic. Some studies suggest that high amounts of garlic may have some protective properties against stomach cancer, although a recent study concluded that it offered no benefits against H. pylori and, in high amounts, can cause considerable GI distress.

Olive Oil. Studies from Spain have shown that phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil may have strong bactericidal activity against 8 strains of H. pylori, 3 of which are resistant to antibiotics.

Vitamins. Although no vitamins have been shown to protect against ulcers, H. pylori appears to impair absorption of vitamin C, which may play a role in the higher risk of stomach cancer.

Some evidence exists that exercise may help reduce the risk for ulcers in some people. In one study, exercise was associated with a lower risk for duodenal, but not gastric, ulcers in men. In this study, exercise appeared to have no effect on ulcer development in women.

Stress relief programs have not been shown to promote ulcer healing, but they may have other health benefits.

Melatonin is a hormone found in the brain that is normally associated with sleep. Researchers have observed that the GI tract is rich in melatonin, and that the hormone may have properties that help prevent ulcers, reduce acid secretion, and improve blood flow. It is not known whether this would benefit people with peptic ulcers, but it appears to warrant some research. In the U.S., melatonin is classified as a dietary supplement and not a drug, so its quality and effectiveness are uncontrolled. The U.S. is the only developed nation that does not regulate this agent.

Resources

http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov -- National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse
www.gastro.org -- American Gastroenterological Association
www.acg.gi.org -- American College of Gastroenterology

References

deBortoli M, Leonardi G, Ciancia E, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized prospective study of triple therapy versus triple therapy plus lactoferrin and probiotics. Am J. Gastroenterol. 2007;102(5):951-956.

Guyton JR, Bays HE. Safety considerations with niacin therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(6A):22C-31C.

Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, et al. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):1179-1183.

Hallas J, Dall M, Andries A, et al. Use of single and combined antithrombotic therapy and risk of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: population based case-control study. BMS. 2006;333(7571):726. Epub 2006 Sept 19.

Hobsley M, Tovey F, Horton J. Precise role of H. pylori in duodenal ulceration. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(40):6413-6419.

Goer A, Gothe H, Schiffhorst G, Sterzel A, Grass U, Haussler B. Comparison of the effects of diclofenac or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and dicolfenac or other NSAIDs in combination with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on hospitalization due to peptic ulcer disease. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Feb 26 [Epub ahead of print].

Jansson EA, Petersson J, Reinders C, et al. Protection from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID)-induced gastric ulcers by dietary nitrate. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;41(4):510-518.

Keefer L, Stepanski EJ, Ranjbaran Z, Benson LM, Keshavarzian A. An initial report of sleep disturbance in inactive inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2006;2(4):409-416.

Kim JI, Cheung DY, Cho SH, et al. Oral proton pump inhibitors are as effective as endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 May 19 [Epub ahead of print].

Luo J, Nordenvall C, Nyren O, Adami HO, Permert J, Ye W. The risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(2):368-372.

Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain C, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastrict III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007;56(6):772-781.

Miki K, Urita Y, Ishikawa F, et al. Effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum fermented milk on Helicobacter pylori and serum pepsinogen levels in humans. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(6):2630-2640.

Moberly JB, Harris SI, Diff DS, et al. A randomized, double-blind, one-week study comparing the effects of a novel COX-2 inhibitor and naproxen on the gastric mucosa. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(2):442-450.

Moore ML. Misoprostol-is more research needed? J Perinat Educ. 2002;11(3):43-47.

Murthy S, Keyvani L, Leeson S, Targownik LE. Intravenous versus high-dose oral proton pump inhibitor therapy after endoscopic hemostasis of high-risk lesions in patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;63(11):773-775.

Pietroiusti A, Forlini A, Magrini A, et al. Shift work increases the frequency of duodenal ulcer in H. pylori infected workers. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(11):773-775.

Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Leandro G, et al. Clinical features of reflux esophagitis in older people: a study of 840 consecutive patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(10):1537-1542.

Romero C, Medina E, Vargas J, Brenes M, De Castro A. In vitro activity of olive oil polyphenols against Helicobacter pylori. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(3):680-688.

Saif MW, Elfiky A, Salem RR. Gastrointestinal perforation due to bevacizumab in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(6):1860-1869.

Simon-Rudler M, Massard J, Bernard-Chabert B, et al. Continuous infusion of high-dose omeprazole is more effective than standard-dose omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(:949-954.

Take S, Mizuno M, Ishiki K, et al. Baseline gastric mucosal atrophy is a risk factor associated with the development of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42(suppl 17):21-27.

Ushida Y, Shimokawa Y, Toida T, Matsui H, Takase M. Bovine alpha-lacalbumin stimulates mucus metabolism in gastric mucosa. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(2):541-546.

Vaira D, Zullo A, Vakil N, et al. Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(:556-563.

Verhamme K, Mosis G, Dieleman J, Stricker B, Sturkenboom M. Spironolactone and risk of upper gastrointestinal events: population-based case-control study. BMJ. 2006;333(7563):330. Epub 2006 Jul 13.

Yeomans ND, Svedberg LD, Naesdal J. Is ranitidine therapy sufficient for healing peptic ulcers associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use? Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(11):1401-407.

Zagari RM, Bianchi-Porro G, Fiocca R, Gasbarrini G, Roda E, Bazzoli F. Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the HYPER study. Gut. 2007;56(4):475-479.

Review Date:
6/22/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Skin wrinkles and blemishes

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:59 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Blemishes
Risk Factors
Prevention
Treatment
Resurfacing Treatments
Implant Procedures
Plastic Surgery
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Smoking and Skin Damage

The skin of smokers ages more rapidly than the skin of non-smokers, even in areas of the body not exposed to sunlight, according to a 2007 study. Women in the study who smoked also had much lower levels of vitamin E secretions in their skin. Vitamin E may protect the skin from sun damage.
There may be an association between smoking and higher frequency of a type of acne (noninflammatory acne) in adult women, according to a European study.

Antioxidants and Your Skin

A study in the Journal of Nutrition found that a combination of antioxidants and trace elements supplementation raises the risk of skin cancer in women, but not in men.

Ultraviolet Radiation

Overall, exposure to ultraviolet radiation from sunlight (radiation referred to as UVA or UVB) accounts for about 90% of the symptoms of premature skin aging.
UVB primarily affects the outer skin layers. It is most intense when sunlight is brightest. People receive slightly over 70% of their yearly UVB dose during the summer.
UVA penetrates more deeply and efficiently. The intensity of UVA rays is less dependent on the time of day and season of the year than that of UVB rays.

Vitamin D

A report analyzing studies of vitamin D supplementation found that people who take vitamin D supplements live longer than those who do not. People who avoid sunlight are at risk for vitamin D deficiency.

Introduction

As you age, your skin undergoes progressive changes:

The cells divide more slowly, and the inner layer of skin (the dermis) starts to thin. Fat cells beneath the dermis begin to shrink. In addition, the ability of the skin to repair itself decreases with age, so wounds heal more slowly. The thinning skin becomes vulnerable to injuries and damage.
The deeper layer of the skin, which provides scaffolding for the surface skin layers, loosens and unravels. Skin then loses its elasticity (ability to stretch). When pressed, it no longer springs back to its initial position. Instead, older skin sags and forms furrows.
The sweat- and oil-secreting glands atrophy (waste away), leaving the skin without a protective layer of water and fat. The skin's ability to stay moisturized then decreases, and it becomes dry and scaly.
Frown lines (those between the eyebrows) and crow's feet (lines that spread from the corners of the eyes) appear to develop because of permanent small muscle contractions. Habitual facial expressions also form characteristic lines.
Gravity makes the situation worse, contributing to the formation of jowls and drooping eyelids. Eyebrows, surprisingly, move up as a person ages, possibly pulled up by forehead wrinkles.

Wrinkles can have a profound impact on self-esteem. The stigma attached to looking old is evidenced by the more than $12 billion Americans spend each year on cosmetics to hide the signs of aging. Our society places a premium on youthfulness, and age discrimination in the workplace, although illegal, has stalled many people's careers. Indeed, the emotional consequences of aging explain in large part why the cosmetics industry and plastic surgeons thrive.

The sun is the most important cause of prematurely aging skin (a process called photoaging) and skin cancers. Overall, exposure to ultraviolet radiation from sunlight (radiation referred to as UVA or UVB) accounts for about 90% of the symptoms of premature skin aging. Most of these effects occur by age 20:

Even small amounts of UV radiation trigger the processes leading to skin wrinkles.
Long-term repetitive exposure to sunlight adds up, and likely is responsible for the vast majority of unwanted consequences of aging skin, including basal cell and squamous cell cancers.
Intense exposure to sunlight in early life is an important cause of melanoma, a particularly aggressive type of skin cancer.

Initial Damaging Effects of Sunlight. Ultraviolet radiation penetrates the layers of the skin. Both UVA and UVB rays cause damage leading to wrinkles, lower immunity against infection, aging skin disorders, and cancer. They appear to damage cells in different ways, however.

UVB is the main cause of sunburns, and primarily affects the outer skin layers. UVB is most intense at midday when sunlight is brightest. People receive slightly over 70% of their yearly UVB dose during the summer. We receive only 28% during the remainder of the year. Window glass filters out UVB.
UVA penetrates more deeply and efficiently. The intensity of UVA rays is less dependent on the time of day and season of the year than that of UVB rays. For example, you receive only about half of your yearly UVA dose during the summer months, with the balance spread over the rest of the year. Window glass does NOT filter out UVA.

Both UVA and UVB rays cause damage to the body, including genetic injury, wrinkles, aging skin disorders, and skin cancers. Exactly how they cause this damage is not yet fully understood.

Processes Leading to Wrinkles. Even small amounts of UV radiation trigger the processes that can cause wrinkles:

Sunlight damages collagen fibers (the major protein that gives structure to the skin). Sunlight also causes damage to elastin, a protein in the skin that normally maintains springiness and strength of tissue beneath the skin.
In response to this sun-induced elastin accumulation, the body produces large amounts of enzymes called metalloproteinases. One study indicated that when people with light to moderate skin color are exposed to sunlight for just 5 - 15 minutes, the metalloproteinase levels in their body remain high for about a week.
The normal function of these metalloproteinases is generally positive -- to remodel the sun-injured tissue by producing and repairing collagen. This is an imperfect process, however, and some of metalloproteinases produced by sunlight actually degrade (break down) collagen. The result is an uneven formation (matrix) of disorganized collagen fibers called solar scars. Repetition of this imperfect skin rebuilding causes wrinkles.
An important event in this process is the over-production of oxidants, also called free radicals. These are unstable molecules that are normally produced by chemical processes in the body, a process called oxidation. Environmental damage, however, causes an overproduction of oxidants. Excessive amounts of oxidants damage the body's cells and even alter their genetic material. Oxidation may contribute to wrinkling by activating the specific metalloproteinases that degrade connective tissue.

In addition to sunlight, other factors may hasten the formation of wrinkles:

Cigarette Smoke. Smoking produces oxygen-free radicals, which accelerate wrinkles and aging skin disorders, and increase the risk for non-melanoma skin cancers. Studies also suggest that smoking and subsequent oxidation produce higher levels of metalloproteinases, the enzymes associated with wrinkles.

Air Pollution. Ozone, a common air pollutant, may be a particular problem for the skin. One study reported that it might deplete the amount of vitamin E in the skin. This vitamin is an important antioxidant.

Rapid Weight Loss. If weight loss occurs too rapidly, the volume of fat cells that cushion the face are also decreased before chemicals in the skin can react. This not only makes a person look gaunt, but can cause the skin to sag.

Blemishes

This report covers three types of blemishes: Liver spots, purpura, and seborrheic keratoses (or warts).

Liver spots (known as lentigos, or sun-induced or pigmented lesions) are flat brown spots on the skin. They are almost universal signs of aging. Occurring most noticeably on the hands and face, these blemishes tend to enlarge and darken over time. The extent and severity of the spots are determined by a combination of skin type, sun exposure, and age. These spots are harmless, but should be distinguished from lentigo maligna, which is an early sign of melanoma.

Liver spots or age spots are a type of skin change that are associated with aging. The increased pigmentation may be brought on by exposure to sun, or other forms of ultraviolet light, or other unknown causes.

Treating Liver Spots. Liver spots do not require treatment, although some people are distressed by their appearance. Treatments may include the following:

Trichloroacetic acid (a chemical peel).
Tretinoin (Retin A) alone or in a combination with Mequinol (Solagé). Tretinoin is related to vitamin A, and is also effective in treating wrinkles.
Gentle freezing with liquid nitrogen (cryotherapy).
Laser treatment. Specific lasers, such as the Nd:YAG, are effective in eliminating 80% of liver spots in one treatment. It may be more effective than cryotherapy and have fewer side effects.
Bleaching creams -- these are commonly available but are not as satisfactory as peels, and high concentrations can sometimes cause permanent loss of skin color.

Purpura occurs when tiny capillaries (blood vessels) break and leak blood into the skin. In older people, the condition (called senile or actinic purpura) is usually caused by fragile blood vessels. The capillaries appear as flat purplish patches. These patches are called petechiae when they are smaller than 3 mm (about a tenth of an inch). When they are greater than 3 mm, they are referred to as ecchymoses. Patients typically complain of a rash, which may appear reddish at first but gradually change color, turning brown or purple.

Treatment. Although there is no specific treatment for purpura, patients are advised to avoid trauma, including vigorous rubbing of the skin, which may be sufficient to damage the capillaries. Emollients that soften the skin may be helpful. Some doctors also recommend vitamin C, but its effectiveness is unproven.

Seborrheic keratoses, (also called seborrheic warts), are among the most common skin disorders in older adults. Their cause or causes are unknown. They usually appear on the head, neck, or trunk and can range in size from 0.2 - 3 cm (a little over an inch). They are well defined and appear to be pasted onto the skin, but their appearance can vary widely:

They can be smooth with tiny, round, pearl-like formations embedded in them.
They can be rough and warty.
They can be brown or black.

Seborrheic keratoses sometimes look like melanoma, since they can have an irregular border, but they are always benign. A dermatologist can tell the difference between them, although experts warn that melanomas may "hide" among these benign lesions and go unnoticed without close inspection. In general, seborrheic keratoses have a uniform appearance while melanomas often have a smooth surface that varies in height, color density, and shading. In some cases, keratoses may cause itching or irritation. They can be easily removed with surgery or freezing. Vitamin D3 ointment is also showing promise in clinical trials.

Risk Factors

Exposure to Sun in Childhood. It is estimated that 50 - 80% of skin damage occurs in childhood and adolescence from intermittent, intense sun exposure that causes severe sunburns. In spite of this now well-known effect, many people still believe that a tan in children signifies health. And even though many parents are concerned about sun exposure, they still rely too much on sunscreen and not enough on protective clothing.

The Elderly. Most people over 70 have at least one skin disorder. Many have three or four. Everyone experiences skin changes as they age, but a long life is not the sole determinant of aging skin. Family history, genetics, and behavioral choices all have a profound impact on the onset of aging-skin symptoms.

Of all the risk factors for aging skin, exposure to UV radiation from sunlight is by far the most serious. Indeed, the vast majority of undesirable consequences of aging skin occur in individuals who are repetitively exposed to the sun, including the following:

Outdoor workers, such as farmers, fishermen, construction workers, and lifeguards
Outdoor enthusiasts
Sunbathers
People who regularly attend tanning salons or use tanning beds (One study indicated that regular use significantly increases the risk for non-melanoma skin cancers. Fair-skinned women under age 50 may be at particular risk.)

Experts have devised a classification system for skin phototypes (SPTs) based on the sensitivity to sunlight. It ranges from SPT I (lightest skin plus other factors) to IV (darkest skin). People with skin types I and II are at highest risk for photoaging skin diseases, including cancer. It should be noted, however, that premature aging from sunlight can affect people of all skin shades.


Skin Type	Tanning and Burning History
I	Always burns, never tans, sensitive to sun exposure
II	Burns easily, tans minimally
III	Burns moderately, tans gradually to light brown
IV	Burns minimally, always tans well to moderately brown
V	Rarely burns, tans profusely to dark
VI	Never burns, deeply pigmented, least sensitive

The common belief is that women are at greater risk for wrinkles than men. Some evidence suggests, however, that given the same risk factors, men and women in the same age groups have comparable risks for skin photoaging. In a French study, the evidence of moderate-to-severe photoaging was observed in the following:

Twenty two percent of women and 17% of men ages 45 - 49
Thirty six percent of women and 38% of men by age 54
Nearly half of both men and women by age 60

Some studies report that men are more likely to develop non-melanoma skin cancers.

Heavy smokers are almost five times more likely to have wrinkled facial skin than nonsmokers, according to one study. The skin of smokers in areas of their bodies not exposed to sunlight also seems to age more rapidly, compared to non-smokers in the same age group, according to a 2007 study. In fact, heavy smokers in their 40s often have facial wrinkles more like those of nonsmokers in their 60s.

Studies of identical twins have found smokers to have thinner skin (in some cases by as much as 40%), more severe wrinkles, and more gray hair than their non-smoking twins. Even worse, cigarette smokers are more prone to skin cancers, including squamous cell carcinoma and giant basal cell carcinomas. A European study found an association between smoking and higher frequency of a particular type of acne in adult women. The study also found that women who smoked had much lower levels of vitamin E secretions in their skin. Vitamin E is an antioxidant that may help protect the skin from sun damage. [See In-Depth Report #41: Smoking.]

Prevention

The best long-term prevention for overly wrinkled skin is a healthy lifestyle.

Eat Healthy. A diet with plenty of whole grains, fresh fruits and vegetables, and the use of healthy oils (such as olive oil) may protect against oxidative stress in the skin. One study reported that people over age 70 years had fewer wrinkles if they ate such foods. Diet played a role in improving skin regardless of whether the people in the study smoked or lived in sunny countries. Benefits from these foods may be due to high levels of anti-oxidants found in them.

Exercise. Daily exercise keeps blood flowing, which brings oxygen to the skin. Oxygen is an important ingredient for healthy skin.

Reduce Stress. Reducing stress and tension may have benefits on the skin.

Quit Smoking. Smoking not only increases wrinkles, but smokers have a risk for squamous cell cancers that is 50% higher than nonsmokers' risk. Smokers should quit smoking to prevent many health problems, not just unhealthy skin.

The following are some daily measures for skin protection:

Don't wash your face too often with tap water. (Once a day is enough.) It strips the skin of oil and moisture. In addition, chlorinated water, particularly at high temperatures, poses special risks for wrinkles.
Wash your face with a mild soap that contains moisturizers. Avoid alkaline soaps, especially with deodorant.
Pat the skin dry and immediately apply a water-based moisturizer.
Always apply sunscreen, even if going outdoors for short periods.
Avoid drinking alcohol within 3 hours of bedtime. Alcohol increases the risk for leaks in the capillaries, which allows more water in and causes sagging and puffiness. Capillary leakage increases when one is lying down.
Lie on the back when sleeping. This helps offset the effects of gravity.

One of the most important ways to prevent skin damage is to avoid episodes of excessive sun exposure. The following are some specific guidelines:

Use sunscreens that block out both UVA and UVB radiation. However, do not rely only on sunscreen for sun protection. Wear protective clothing and sunglasses in addition.
Avoid exposure particularly from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., when sunlight pours down 80% of its daily UV dose.
Avoid reflective surfaces, such as water, sand, concrete, and white-painted areas. Clouds and haze are not protective and in some cases may intensify UVB rays.
Ultraviolet intensity depends on the angle of the sun, not heat or brightness. So the dangers are greater the closer to the summer-start date. For example, in the Northern Hemisphere, UV intensity in April (2 months before summer starts) is equal to that in August (2 months after summer begins).
The higher the altitude the quicker one sunburns. One study suggested, for example, that an average complexion burns in 6 minutes at an altitude of 11,000 feet at noon, compared with 25 minutes at sea level in a temperate climate.
Avoid sun lamps and tanning beds or salons. They provide mostly high-output UVA rays. Some experts believe that 15 - 30 minutes at a tanning salon is as dangerous as a day spent in the sun. People should not be misled by advertising claims of "safe" tanning or promotions offering unlimited tanning.

Sunscreens. The use of sunscreens is complex, and everyone should understand how and when to use them. The bottom line is not that people should avoid sunscreens or sunblocks, but that they should always use them in combination with other sun-protective measures.

Protective Clothing. Wearing sun-protective clothing is extremely important and protects even better than sunscreens. Special clothing is now available for blocking UV rays and is rated using SPF ratings or a system called the UPF (ultraviolet protection factor) index, with 50 UPF being the highest. (According to one study, this is a very reliable indicator of protection.) The clothing is expensive, however. The following are some tips for everyone:

Adults and children should wear hats with wide brims. Even wearing a hat, however, may not be fully protective against skin cancers on the head and neck.
People should look for loosely fitted, unbleached, tightly woven fabrics. The tighter the weave, the more protective the garment.
Washing clothes over and over improves UPF by drawing fabrics together during shrinkage. An easy way to assess protection is simply to hold the garment up to a window or lamp and see how much light comes through. The less the better.
Everyone over age 1 should wear sunglasses that block all UVA and UVB rays.

Chemical Tanners. Some research suggests that melanin and dihydroxyacetone (DHA), the active ingredients in many self-tanning lotions, may help filter out UVA and UVB radiation and are therefore protective against sun damage More research is underway. A preliminary study funded by the National Cancer Institute found that people who received numerous daily injections of melanotan-1 (MT-1) before going in the sun or a tanning bed tanned more quickly and showed fewer signs of sun-related damage. MT-1 is a synthetic version of the hormone melanin, which helps produce the skin's natural pigment (color).

In choosing a sunscreen, look at the ingredients. Preparations that help block UV radiation are sometimes classified as sunscreens or sunblocks, according to the substances they contain. In general, sunscreens contain organic formulas and sunblocks inorganic formulas. However, the term sunblock is used less and less as sunscreens increasingly contain both kinds of ingredients:

Organic formulas contain UV-filtering chemicals such as octocrylene, octyl salicylate, homosalate, and octyl methoxycinnamate (block UVB), avobenzone-Parsol 1789 (blocks UVA), cinoxate, ethylhexyl p-methoxycinnamate (blocks UVB and small amounts of UVA), oxybenzone, benzophenone-3 (blocks UVA/UVB). People should look for a wide-spectrum sunscreen that contains combinations of these ingredients and filter both UVA and UVB. Of note: para-amino benzoic acid (PABA), once a popular ingredient, is now used infrequently. PABA may actually break down in the presence of UV exposure and release harmful oxidants. In addition, many people have an allergic reaction to it. Some products contain PABA derivatives, such as padimate O or octyl dimethyl PABA. It is not known if they have the same effects.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Anthelios SX in July 2006. This new sunscreen prevents sunburn and protects against ultraviolet A and B rays. The product contains ecamsule, an ingredient not previously marketed in the United States.
Inorganic formulas contain the UV-blocking pigments zinc oxide or titanium dioxide. Zinc and titanium oxides lie on top of the skin and are not absorbed. They prevent nearly all UVA and UVB rays from reaching the skin. Older sunblocks are white, pasty, and unattractive, but current products use so-called microfine oxides, either zinc (Z-Cote) or titanium. They are transparent and nearly as protective as the older types. Microfine zinc oxide may be more protective and less pasty-colored than microfine titanium oxide.

Inexpensive products work as well as expensive ones with the same ingredients. Unfortunately, there are still no standards for sunscreens, and even those claiming UVA protection may offer very little. In one study, the average UVA protection from a wide range of brands was only 23%. In fact, the average protection of brands not making the claim was 37%!

Organic formulas and inorganic microfine oxides do not protect against visible light, which is a problem for people who have light-sensitive skin conditions, including actinic prurigo, porphyria, and chronic actinic dermatitis. Inorganic sunscreens that protect against visible light and are still cosmetically acceptable are now available in Europe, but not yet in the US.

Calculating the SPF. The sun protection factor (SPF) on all sunscreen labels is a ratio based on the amount of UVB (not UVA) radiation required to turn sunscreen- or sunblock-treated skin red compared to non-treated skin. For instance, people who sunburn in 5 minutes and who want to stay in the sun for 150 minutes might use an SPF 30. The formula would be: 30 (the SPF number) times 5 (minutes to burn) = 150 minutes in the sun.

Protection offered by sunscreens may be classified as follows:

Minimal: SPF 2 to 11.
Moderate: SPF 12 through 29.
High: 30+. (Although some sunscreens claim SPFs higher than 30, the added protection at such higher levels is insignificant.)

SPF Levels by Age Group. Certain groups should have higher or lower SPFs depending on age and other factors:

Although sunscreens are safe in most toddlers and children, they should not be the first and only lines of defense. In fact, experts are worrying that by relying too much on sunscreen and not providing other protective measures, parents may actually be increasing their children's risk for melanoma. All young children should be well covered with clothing, sunglasses, and hats as the first line of defense against sunburn. Children should be kept out of the sun during peak sunlight periods. Sunscreens should not be used on babies younger than 6 months without consulting a doctor.
Older children and adults (even those with darker skin) benefit from using SPFs of 15 and over. Some experts recommend that most people should use SPF 30 on the face and 15 on the body.
Adults who burn easily instead of tanning and anyone with risk factors for skin cancer should use at least SPF 30.

Timing and Amount of Application. You should apply sunscreen or sunblock liberally as follows:

Adults should include sunscreen with a daily skin regimen, even if going outdoors for only a short time.
Apply a large amount to all exposed areas, including ears and feet. To achieve protection as indicated by the sunscreen's SPF, experts recommend half a teaspoon each for the head, neck, and each arm and a teaspoon each for the chest area, the back, and each leg.
Apply initially 30 minutes before venturing outdoors for best results. (This allows time for the sunscreen to be absorbed. Then reapply every 15 - 30 minutes while being in the sunlight.
Also reapply each time after exercise or swimming. (Choose a waterproof or water-resistant formula even if activities don't include swimming. Waterproof formulas last for about 40 minutes in the water, whereas water-resistant formulas last half as long.)
Insect repellents reduce sunscreen SPFs by up to one-third. Use higher SPFs and very liberal application when applying both.

Possible Hazards of Sunscreens, Sun Avoidance, or Both. When used generously and appropriately, sunscreen products and sun avoidance help reduce the severity of many aging skin disorders, including squamous cell cancers. There are certain concerns, however.

Sunscreen Use May Not Protect Against Basal Cell and Melanoma Cancers and May Even Increase the Risk. Although sunscreens help prevent squamous cell carcinomas and other skin disorders, sunscreens do not appear to provide protection against melanoma and some basal cell cancers. In fact, some studies have reported a higher association with sunscreen use and these skin malignancies, though not all studies report such negative results.

The reasons for this possible increased risk are unclear, though some theories include the following:

Until recently, many sunscreens blocked only or mostly UVB rays and not UVA, the more deeply penetrating rays now known to be especially dangerous. Past studies may not have reflected the effects of the broad-spectrum sunscreens now available, which block both UVA and UVB.
People who apply sunscreens may feel safe and stay out longer during high sun-exposure hours than is safe. Even if a person doesn't sunburn, UVA rays can still penetrate the skin and do harm.
People may not put on enough sunscreen. According to a 2002 study, people generally apply only 20 - 60% of the recommended amount, which can provide significantly less protection than the given SPF. (Of note, a 2003 study reported that when applied at the recommended amount, a broad-screen sunscreen prevents DNA damage from UV exposure. However, omitting it even once resulted in significant cell injury.)

Sunscreen Use May Increase the Risk for Health Problems Related to Sunlight Deficiencies. There is some major concern that underexposure to sunlight, due to the use of sunscreens or sun-avoidance measures, may produce other health problems, such as the following:

Vitamin D Deficiency. Vitamin D is found in only a few foods, such as fortified dairy products and fish, but it is produced in the skin in response to UVB sunlight. A medical literature review published in the journal Nutrition and Cancer reported that UVB rays may outshine dietary supplements for building the body's vitamin D reserves. Without an appropriate mix of diet and supplements, vigorous sun protection measures may increase a person's risk for developing vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D is important for prevention of rickets, osteoporosis, and some cancers, including melanoma. People who need to avoid sunlight and whose diet is low in foods that contain vitamin D should check with their doctor about taking supplements. People with darker skin are at higher risk for deficiencies from sun protection than those with whiter skin. Note: vitamin D is toxic in high doses. Most doctors recommend 200 IU a day (for young adults) to 600 IU a day (above age 70). Doses up to 2,000 IU a day are considered safe. A report analyzing studies of vitamin D supplementation found that people who take vitamin D supplements live longer than those who do not. The researchers looked at 18 studies. They found that participants who received vitamin D supplements were, on average, 7% less likely to die during the study they were in, compared with those receiving "sugar pills."
Other Cancers. Although sunlight is implicated in skin cancers, it is also associated with lower risks for breast, prostate, ovarian, and colon cancers. Some protection against these cancers may be related to vitamin D production by sunlight.
Depression. Many people suffer from SAD (seasonal affective disorder), a form of depression that generally occurs in winter and is associated with exposure to less sunlight.

The bottom line is that some sunlight is important and even necessary for a healthful and high-quality life. Adults may benefit from daily moderate tanning (20 - 30 maximum minutes of exposure during lower-risk hours) over several days to slowly build up pigment in the skin.

Treatment

An increasing number of dermatology patients are looking for a way to improve the appearance of their skin. As a result, more and more products have become available to treat skin wrinkles and blemishes. From vitamins and supplements to exfoliants and chemical peels -- the options can be overwhelming. In some cases, more than one approach may be needed.

Antioxidants are substances that hunt oxygen-free radicals, the unstable particles that can damage cells. Free radicals may also cause sun damage and even skin cancers. Exposure to sunlight depletes antioxidants in the skin, and therefore they must be replaced.

Antioxidant ointments, creams, and lotions ("topical products") may help reduce the risk of wrinkles and protect against sun damage. Unlike sunscreens, they build up in the skin and are not washed away, so the protection may last. Selenium, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), and alpha-lipoic acid are types of antioxidants that come in topical form. Many are proving to be very beneficial for the skin.

Vitamin A. Vitamin A is important for skin health. UV radiation produces vitamin A deficiencies in the skin. Topical products containing natural forms of vitamin A (retinol, retinaldehyde) or vitamin A-related products called retinoids (tretinoin, tazarotene) may help repair skin damage due to sunburn and natural aging.

Tretinoin (Retin-A). Tretinoin (known commercially as Retin-A) is the only topical agent approved for treating photoaging and is available in prescription form (Avita, Renova, Differin). The June 2004 issue of Dermatology Surgery reported that tretinoin (0.25% concentration) was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for photodamaged facial skin. This drug produces a rosy glow and reduces fine and large wrinkles, liver spots, and surface roughness. It also may help prevent more serious effects of ultraviolet radiation. Patients may apply tretinoin to the face, neck, chest, hands, and forearms, and should do so at least twice a week. Noticeable improvement takes 2 - 6 months. Because Retin-A increases a person's sensitivity to the sun, patients should apply just a tiny amount at bedtime, and wear sunblock during the day. Patients should also avoid overexposure to the sun. Almost all patients experience redness, scaling, burning, and itching after 2 or 3 days that can last up to 3 months. In women who experience irritation, a daytime moisturizer or low-dose corticosteroid cream, such as 1% hydrocortisone, may help. There is some concern that overuse of high-dose tretinoin may cause excessive skin thinness over time. Studies now suggest that low concentrations (as low as .02%) of tretinoin can produce significant improvements in wrinkles and skin color, with less irritation than the higher doses.
Retinol. Retinol, a natural form of vitamin A, could not, until recently, be used in skin products because it was unstable and easily broken down by UV radiation. Stable preparations are now sold over the counter. In the right concentrations, retinol may be as effective as tretinoin, and studies indicate that it has fewer side effects. An animal study suggests that adding antioxidant creams (such as those containing vitamins C or E) may offer added protection against degradation of retinol, but not tretinoin. The Food and Drug Administration warns that over-the-counter retinol skin products are unregulated. The amount of active ingredients is unknown, and some preparations, in fact, may contain almost no retinol.
Tazarotene. Tazarotene (Tazorac, Zorac, Avage) is a retinoid used for acne and psoriasis. It has now been approved for treating wrinkles, skin discoloration, and blemishes due to photoaging. One short-term study suggested that it may be as effective as tretinoin and even slightly better at high doses. At such high doses, however, it can cause very severe irritation. Redness and peeling may be reduced by administering tretinoin first to get the skin acclimated. A randomized study of 562 patients with facial photodamage found that a daily application of tazarotene 0.1% cream resulted in a minimum 1 grade improvement in fine and coarse wrinkling, uneven skin color, pore size, skin roughness, and overall photodamage. More research is needed to determine if it produces any long-lasting significant benefits.

Warning: Pregnant women and those who may become pregnant should avoid any vitamin A derivative (a product related to vitamin A). For example, oral tretinoin causes birth defects, and women should avoid even topical Retin-A when pregnant or trying to conceive.

Vitamin C. Vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, is a very potent antioxidant. Most studies on the effects of antioxidants on the skin have used this vitamin. In laboratory studies, large amounts of vitamin C reduced skin swelling and protected immune factors from sunlight. It may even promote collagen production. Vitamin C by itself is unstable, but products that solve the delivery problem are now available (such as Cellex-C, Avon's Anew Formula C Treatment Capsules, Physician Elite, and others). More research is needed.

Antioxidants Under Investigation for Skin Care. Other antioxidants are also being investigated for their value in skin protection. Most available brands, however, contain very low concentrations of these antioxidants. In addition, they are also not well absorbed and have a short-term effect. New delivery techniques, however, may prove to offset some of these problems.

Vitamin E. Studies suggest that topical vitamin E, particularly alpha tocopherol cream (a form of vitamin E), decreased skin roughness, length of facial lines, and wrinkle depth. Studies on mice have also reported reductions in UV-induced skin cancer with its use.
Both green and black tea may provide some protection against skin cancers and photoaging. There is also some evidence that pomegranate and soy extracts may help rejuvenate aging skin.
Aloe, ginger, grape seed extract, and coral extracts contain antioxidants and are promoted as being healthy for the skin, although evidence of their effects on wrinkles is weak.

A small study found that taking vitamin C and E supplements by mouth -- at the same time -- may help reduce sunburn, although it doesn't work as well as sunscreen. Taking the vitamins separately did not have any effect. Vitamin C and E are also antioxidants.

One of the basic methods for improving skin and eliminating small wrinkles is exfoliation (also called resurfacing), which is the removal of the top layer of skin to allow regrowth of new skin. Methods for doing this run from simple scrubs to special creams to intensive peeling treatments, including laser resurfacing. People with darker skin are at particularly higher risk for scarring or discoloration with the more powerful exfoliation methods.

Abrasive Scrubs. Scrub gently with a mildly abrasive material and a soap that contains salicylic acid to remove old skin so that new skin can grow. The motion should be perpendicular to the wrinkles. Use textured material or cleansing grains with microbeads. Organic materials, such as loofahs or sea sponges, may harbor bacteria. Avoid cleansing grains that contain pulverized walnut shells and apricot seeds, which can scratch skin on a microscopic level. Cleansing grains with microbeads don't have sharp edges and remove skin without cutting it. Exfoliation using scrubs, however, can worsen certain conditions, such as acne, sensitive skin, or broken blood vessels.

Topical Alpha Hydroxy Acid and Similar Substances. Alpha hydroxy acids (AHA) ease the shedding of dead skin cells and may even stimulate the production of collagen and elastin. Their natural forms are:

Lactic acid (milk)
Glycolic acid (sugar cane)
Malic acid (found in apples and pears)
Citric acid (oranges and lemons)
Tartaric acids (grapes)

Most alpha hydroxy acid products contain glycolic acid. Skin care products are also made from polyhydroxy acids (PHAs) and beta hydroxy acids (BHAs). Research suggests that PHA products may cause less skin irritation than AHA or BHA products.

Acid concentrations in over-the-counter AHA preparations are 2 - 10%. One clinical study suggested that 8% concentrations showed modest skin improvement Some examples include Avon's Anew Intensive Treatment (8% glycolic), Pond's Age Defying Complex (8%), Elizabeth Arden's Alpha-Ceramid Intensive Skin Treatment (3 - 7.5%), and BioMedic's home product (10%). Prescription strength creams contain at least 12% glycolic acid, and glycolic acid peels of 30 - 70% concentration may be administered in a doctor's office at weekly or monthly intervals.

Response to AHA varies, and the treatment is not without risk, particularly in high-concentration products. Side effects from over-the-counter creams, prescription products, and professional AHA peels can include burns, itching, pain, and possibly scarring. Studies also suggest that AHA may increase susceptibility to sun damage, even at concentrations as low as 4%. Such effects can persist up to a week after a person stops using the product. Experts advise that people purchase products with AHA concentrations of 10% or less. Chemical peels of up to 60% are available without prescription on the Internet. Such concentrations are not recommended, except under a doctor's supervision. If any adverse effects occur, stop using the product immediately. Always avoid sunlight or use proper sun protection when using these products.

Copper Peptides. Certain copper-containing compounds may protect skin and help repair it. Note: copper is a toxic metal. When using products containing copper, buy only those that contain peptides (small protein fragments) that bind to copper. Most studies have been conducted on the copper peptide glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine:copper (II) or GHK-Cu. It is currently used in a number of products (such as CP Serum, Neutrogena's Visibly Firm, ProCyte's Neova).

Furfuryladenine. Furfuryladenine (Kinetin, Kinerase) is a naturally occurring growth hormone found in plant and animal DNA. It has antioxidant and anti-aging properties. Some small laboratory studies suggest that furfuryladenine may delay the onset and decrease the effects of aging on skin. However, there are no well-conducted human studies to support this suggestion.

Vitamin K. Microsponge-based vitamin K is said to clear bruises spider veins, and other small blood vessel damage. Vitamin K is important for blood clotting.

Moisturizers help prevent dryness, bruising, and tearing. They have no effect on wrinkles by themselves. Moisturizers should be applied while the skin is still damp. These products retain skin moisture in various ways:

Occlusives, such as petroleum jelly, prevent water from evaporating.
Humectants, including glycerin, act by pulling water up to the surface of the skin from deep tissues. People with oily skin generally should use the humectant type.
More powerful compounds, such as monolaurin (Glylorin), contain mixtures of fatty molecules (lipids), which may help restore the skin's natural barriers against moisture loss and damage.

Most moisturizers contain combinations of these compounds. They usually have other ingredients as well, such as alpha hydroxy acids, sunscreens, collagen, and keratin. Collagen and keratin leave a protein film and temporarily stretch the skin. They range widely in price, and a major consumer organization found little difference in general between the more and less expensive products.

The skin under the eyes is very thin and does not produce as much of the protective oils that keep skin soft and supple. Manufacturers market their under-eye gels as being able to reduce puffiness and dark circles. The creams typically work in one of two ways:

By temporarily constricting blood vessels to prevent the build-up of fluids
By firming the skin with an invisible film

Never rub the creams under the eyes, as this may cause more wrinkles to form. Instead, apply these products with a light tapping motion to stimulate the skin.

Cosmetics, if properly applied, can be surprisingly effective in camouflaging the signs of aging skin, including wrinkles and age spots. Moreover, they offer additional benefits by retarding water loss and providing a physical barrier to UV radiation. However, as women age, less is more.

Here are some suggestions for older women:

Moisturizers. Apply moisturizers before foundation. If reddish discoloration is extensive or the skin is sallow, tinted moisturizers may be helpful and can be worn alone or under foundation.

Foundations. Caking on make-up will cause cracks at the wrinkle lines and only increase the appearance of aging. Try to cover large areas of the face with a moderate-coverage foundation that has a matte or semi-matte finish. Facial powder reflects light and thus minimizes wrinkles, but people with dry skin should avoid it.

Correcting Color. When blemishes are especially prominent, applying color correctors under the foundation can be very effective:

Green neutralizers mask red lesions.
Yellow will camouflage dark circles and bruises.
Mauve (a purplish-pink color) helps neutralize sallow skin or yellowish blemishes.
A white, pearled base helps to minimize wrinkles.

Blushes. Blushes and color washes can help conceal the spidery network of dilated capillaries on the nose and cheeks. Powder blushes are preferred because they blend easily on top of foundation.

Eyes. Powder eye shadows applied on top of a moisturizer are better than cream-based shadows. Light-colored shadow, applied along the upper eyelid crease and above the iris (the colored part of the eye) is best for offsetting the appearance of deep-set eyes. You should then apply a slightly deeper shade of the same color to the lower part of the eyelid, and draw it out to the corner.

Lips. A lip-setting cream or facial foundation should be applied before lipstick to help prevent it from bleeding into surrounding wrinkles. Try using a stiff bristle brush instead of a lip pencil. The brush will help keep the lipstick on and prevent bleeding. (Some women use the pencil itself for the full lip, which gives color but appears natural.) Some make-up artists recommend cream lipsticks instead of matte.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not regulate herbal remedies and dietary supplements. In other words, the manufacturers and distributors of such products do not need FDA approval to sell their products. In addition, any substance that affects the body's chemistry can, like any drug, produce side effects that may be harmful. There have been numerous reported cases of serious and even deadly side effects from herbal products.

Overexposure to sunlight can damage skin. The following natural remedies may cause extra sensitivity to light (photosensitivity):

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) is a popular herbal remedy for depression. People who are sensitive to light should not use it. A case report suggests that St. John's wort may cause skin reactions in patients who have laser treatment.
Kava (Piper methysticum) is an herb used to calm nerves and reduce stress. In addition to photosensitivity, it can cause liver damage.
Yohimbe (Pausinystalia yohimbe) is used to treat erectile dysfunction. Both the herb and the pharmaceutical drug (yohimbine) can cause sensitivity to light.
Essential oils in many botanical aromatherapy products can trigger photosensitivity. Avoid citrus oils (grapefruit, lemon, lime, and orange) as well as bergamot, cumin, ginger, and angelica root oils.

Resurfacing Treatments

There are many choices for skin resurfacing (also called exfoliation), and the patient must consider several different factors that affect the choice. Resurfacing can achieve the following:

Removal of abnormal tissue and rough skin
Stimulation of new skin growth
Stimulation of collagen and elastin production

In addition to determining the skill of the surgeon and the safety of the procedure, the patient must discuss the desired depth of the resurfacing and the capability of each procedure to reach this depth safely. All resurfacing procedures require a healing period afterward, during which the skin is red and sensitive. The deeper the procedure, the higher the risk for complications, including delayed healing, infection, loss of pigment (skin color), and scarring.

If you make the decision to pursue intensive treatments, consider the following factors, among others, and discuss them with your dermatologist or plastic surgeon:

The ability of the procedure to safely reduce wrinkles
The ease and safety record of the procedure
The skill of the doctor
The length of recovery
Possible complications
How long the benefits will last

A person's age also helps determine the procedure:

For people in their 30s, a simple chemical peel is sufficient.
After age 40, people may benefit from collagen or fat implants.
At age 50 and over, plastic surgeons recommend laser resurfacing and customized treatments for individual needs.

In older individuals, combination procedures may be beneficial. Some examples include the following:

Laser surgery may be used for deep lines (such as those around the mouth) and chemical peels used over the rest of the face.
For enhancing the eye by correcting droopy eyelids, bags, and a "sinking" brow, combinations of eyelift (blepharoplasty), Botox, and laser resurfacing may be used.

Chemical peels, also known as chemosurgery, help restore wrinkled, lightly scarred, or blemished facial skin. Much like chemical paint strippers, chemical peels strip off the top layers of skin, and new, younger-looking skin grows back. The procedure is very effective for the upper lip but cannot be performed around the eyes. Partial peels are often done in conjunction with a face-lift. Combinations of the topical antioxidants, such as tretinoin and vitamin C, along with a chemical peel, may be particularly effective.

The Procedure.

A dermatologist applies chemicals to the skin. They include trichloroacetic acid, high concentrations of alpha hydroxy or beta hydroxy acids, or combinations of all three.
In some cases, tretinoin or alpha hydroxy is applied 4 - 6 weeks before, and starting one day after, the peel. Such treatments can enhance the effects of a peel and reduce the risk of discoloration in people at risk for this complication. Tretinoin is being tested as a chemical peel.
A crust or scab generally forms within 24 hours after surgery. You can remove this scab by gently cleansing with soap and water.
The skin takes 6 - 7 days to heal.
After the scab disappears, the visible skin is deep red but gradually lightens as it regenerates.

Complications. Complications include white heads, cold sores, infection, scarring, numbness, and permanent discoloration, particularly in people with darker skin. Refinement of chemical peel techniques are now permitting doctors to reach deeper skin, improvements which make it easier to apply peels to non-facial skin and to individuals with darker skin.

Dermabrasion affects deeper layers of skin than chemical peels, and may be useful for removing disfiguring marks, such as deep acne scars or deep wrinkles. As with chemical peels, it is effective for wrinkles on the upper lip and chin, and cannot be used around the eyes. Some doctors prefer dermabrasion to lasers for skin surfacing of people with darker skin colors.

Standard Dermabrasion. Standard dermabrasion uses a rotating brush that removes the top layers of a person's skin. As with chemical peels, dermabrasion selectively strips away the upper layers of skin, leaving the underlying skin layers exposed. Similar to chemical peels, after the procedure, the treated skin oozes and forms a scab, a reaction that looks and feels uncomfortable, but only temporary. Postoperative care is similar for both procedures.

Microdermabrasion. A gentler variation called microdermabrasion uses very tiny crystals to polish the skin and a vacuum technique to remove them. It has largely replaced the older dermabrasion, and, in fact, was the fourth most common non-surgical cosmetic procedure performed in 2005, with over a million done. Results are similar to light chemical peels. Patients can have this procedure done on their lunch hour and return to work. Only mild redness occurs after treatment, although for best results five or six repetitive treatments are needed every 1 - 2 weeks. To date, overall patient satisfaction has been very high.

Lasers are currently the most effective exfoliation tools for eliminating wrinkles. Their unique advantages over other resurfacing methods are their ability to tighten the skin. A successful procedure can make patients look 10 - 20 years younger, and the results can last up to 10 years.

The procedure is most beneficial for the following areas:

It is best around the mouth and eyes. Recent evidence suggests CO₂ lasers may be even better than dermabrasion for the upper lip.
It is slightly less beneficial for the area around the nose.

Used alone, current laser therapy does not eliminate crow's feet, broken blood vessels, or dark circles under the eye. The evidence of the effects of lasers on acne scars is incomplete.

Standard laser dermabrasion is too harsh for thinner skin layers, such as on the neck. Newer and gentler laser techniques, however, stimulate collagen without removing skin layers, and may prove to be useful for necklines.

The Laser Resurfacing Procedure. In general the procedure works in the following way:

Laser pulses penetrate the skin quickly, vaporizing water and surface skin without damaging the deeper layers, allowing new top skin to grow.
In addition, the laser delivers enough heat to shorten collagen fibers, restoring some elasticity to the skin.

Choice of Lasers. The lasers used depend on skin type and severity of the condition. Some of the more common laser types are:

The carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser. This is the most powerful laser treatment and is used for deep wrinkles and skin imperfections. People who have had silicone injections should not have CO₂ procedures, which can burn and scar the skin over the implanted area.
The erbium: YAG (Er:YAG). This laser is gentler than the CO₂ laser, and is effective for mild wrinkles and for providing a smooth skin texture. It has a shorter recovery time. Some experts have even found the YAG laser as effective in removing deep wrinkles as CO₂ when used to sufficient depth. A variable pulse YAG laser can shift between pulses that destroy skin tissue to those that heat the skin. This process effectively resurfaces the skin with fewer side effects than CO₂ laser therapy.
Pulsed dye laser. Pulsed dye laser uses yellow light, which is easily absorbed by hemoglobin, the molecule that gives blood its red color. Pulsed dye laser treatments are used to treat skin blemishes that are due to blood vessel abnormalities, such as port-wine stains.

A gentle laser procedure called non-ablative laser resurfacing (NLite), also called photorejuvenation, is now approved for the treatment of all facial wrinkles. The procedure uses light energy to gently stimulate new collagen, and possibly elastin production, without removing the skin tissue itself. Its effects are less pronounced than those of other laser procedures. However, because it does not injure the external layers of skin, it can be used on delicate skin areas, such as the neck and around the eyes. It also causes very little irritation afterward.

Some surgeons are using combination techniques that employ more than one laser technology in one session, to achieve different effects. For example, one combination technique uses CO₂, YAG, pulsed-dye laser, and one other laser technology to both improve wrinkles and clear under-eye dark circles and acne scarring. Pretreatment with botulinum (Botox) injections before laser resurfacing significantly improved the treatment of crow's feet in one study.

Post-Procedure Recovery. The procedure itself is relatively painless, but the redness and irritation that occur during the healing process can be severe. Non-ablative laser resurfacing does not have the same severe after-effects as other laser treatments. For 8 - 9 days, the face looks skinned and swollen, and requires continuous moisturizing. Some doctors suggest that people with very sensitive skin, who cannot tolerate the necessary medications and lubricants, should avoid laser resurfacing. Redness and sensitivity can persist for 1 - 4 months. The patient must stay out of the sun as much as possible during this time, and should always avoid sunbathing and damaging their skin again. Early research suggests that silicone dressings may reduce post-procedure pain and crusting.

Complications. Scarring and infections can occur in about 1% of procedures. The risk of complications depends on the experience of the surgeon. People with a history of herpes simplex may experience flare-ups of fever, facial pain, and flu-like symptoms for 5 or 6 days after the procedure. In addition, people with darker skin may wish to avoid the procedure, because it can cause unpredictable and dramatic lightening of the skin.

A new skin rejuvenation technology, called Plasma Skin Resurfacing, or Portrait Plasma, was introduced in February 2005. The technology uses plasma energy (heat and light energy) to rejuvenate the skin from the deeper layers outwards. While new skin regenerates, the outer layers of the skin act as a natural bandage. When the outer layers peel off in the week after treatment, the new skin emerges. The process prevents or minimizes the raw appearance that follows laser treatments. This system uses radio waves to "excite" nitrogen gas, resulting in the release of energy. According to the manufacturer, skin regeneration using the Portrait Plasma system is rapid, and satisfaction with the procedure appears high. Long-term follow-up studies are not available yet for this new method. In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration approved this method for the treatment of wrinkles on other areas of the body, besides the face.

Cold Ablation. Cold ablation, called coblation for short, delivers saline (salt water) to the skin, through which a cool electric current is passed. A subsequent reaction heats and vaporizes the top shallow layer of skin. The procedure is very specific and appears to minimize any damage to other areas of the skin.

Radiofrequency Resurfacing. A promising technique uses low radiowave energy to resurface the skin. Preliminary research indicates that this procedure may eventually be as effective as laser surgery in reducing severe wrinkles around the eyes and mouth, with minimal pain and a shorter recovery time. In one study, one radiofrequency treatment with only a skin anesthetic resulted in tighter facial skin for 14 out of 15 patients within 12 weeks. All but one patient returned to normal activity immediately afterward. A small clinical trial published in Dermatology Surgery found that a noninvasive radiofrequency technique called NARF safely and effectively improved drooping lower eyelids.

Intense Pulsed Light. Intense pulsed light (IPL) uses filters to deliver different wavelengths of light. Doctors use it to treat a number of photoaging skin problems, and it appears to have long-term effects. Typically, four to six treatments are performed over a four-month period. Each treatment takes 15 - 20 minutes. Unlike laser light, which uses one color wavelength (such as green or red), intense pulsed light starts with a full spectrum of light. It then allows the doctor to selectively block off specific wavelengths, depending on how shallow or deep the procedure should go. IPL machines are less expensive and safer than lasers.

Implant Procedures

Implants, also called injectable fillers, are becoming a common means of erasing wrinkles and folds. Several materials are being used for deep wrinkles, depression under the eyes, lip enhancements, and acne scars.

After being banned from the market in 1992, silicone is making a comeback in research settings as a potential permanent wrinkle eraser. Scientists are looking into a new microdroplet technique (the use of very small drops) combined with purified silicone as a way to eliminate any danger. The past problems with silicone occurred when it was mixed with a foreign substance, like mineral oil, or when it was injected in large doses.

Most implants to date, however, are not completely satisfactory. Collagen implants and biologic fillers from animal, bacterial, or human sources do not provide long-lasting benefits. Synthetic fillers are permanent but may cause an allergic reaction, which can lead to chronic problems. Such reactions are rare, but they can be painful and unattractive.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Juvéderm product line in June 2006. Juvéderm is an injectable treatment of moderate-to-severe facial wrinkles and folds. Juvéderm products are gels made from hyaluronic acid. They are injected into the face. Doctors report good results after a single treatment with Juvéderm, and the results last for at least 6 months.


Name and Material Used	Procedure	Specific Areas Affected	Benefits	Drawbacks
Collagen implants. Collagen is the protein that forms the structures in the body (such as skin, bones, cartilage). The implant procedure has typically used bovine (cow) collagen. A form of human collagen (CosmoDerm, CosmoPlast) has now been approved.	Injected into target wrinkles with needle and syringe. Several weeks after injection, cow collagen breaks down and is replaced by newly created human collagen.	Wrinkles around the eyes and mouth. It is used to give lips greater fullness.	Very simple with faster recovery than many other implant techniques.	Wrinkles form again, and require repeat treatments 3 - 12 months later. Rarely, severe allergic reactions occur. Should not be used by children, pregnant women, and people with a history of autoimmune disease.
Microlipoinjection. Fat tissue from the patient's own thigh or abdomen.	Injected into target wrinkles with needle and syringe.	Deep wrinkles around the nose and mouth, folds in the forehead, and wrinkles on the hands.	No allergic or immune reaction because substance is patient's own fat.	Body eventually absorbs the fat, resulting in a need for multiple injections. Some studies suggest that 70% of the fat may still be in place after at least a year.
Gore-Tex. Highly porous (full of tiny holes) and inert (not chemically active) synthetic material.	Requires some surgery. Tiny patches are inserted under the skin to fill out wrinkles. Skin cells and blood vessels pass through the porous material easily, reducing the risk of severe irritation.	Deep wrinkles.	Material does not break down.	Possible scarring from surgical procedure. Allergic reactions are rare but can occur even with chemically inactive materials.
Artecoll. Contains PMMA, or polymethylmethacrylate, an inert substance, enclosed in tiny droplets of natural collagen.	Material is injected. Body absorbs collagen. PMMA remains and stimulates new collagen growth.	Deep wrinkles.	Although part of the implant is a natural collagen implant, it does not degrade as quickly as a full collagen implant.	Repeat treatments may still be needed. Possible allergic reaction.
Hyaluronic acid. Natural (non-animal) substance acts like a molecular sponge to absorb water. The FDA approved Restylane in 2003, Captiva, Hylaform-Plus, and Hylaform in 2004, and Juvéderm in 2006.	Gel is injected under the skin.	Moderate-to-severe wrinkles.	Low risk for allergic reaction. May last longer than cow collagen.	Repeat treatments needed.
Poly-L-lactic acid. Synthetic polymer. Approved in US as Sculpta. Approved in other countries as New-Fill.	Material is injected under the skin.	Approved in U.S. only for patients with facial fat loss due to HIV. Approved in other countries for wrinkles.	Low risk of allergies. Treatment effects can last 18 - 24 months.	Doctors require special training.

The popularity of Botox injections has skyrocketed in the United States. Between 2004 and 2005, the number of procedures performed jumped 16 percent. Botox injection was the number one non-surgical cosmetic procedure in 2005, with more than 3.2 million injections. Botulinum, the deadly toxin found in uncooked foods, is also a powerful muscle-relaxant. Tiny amounts of a purified form (Botox) are injected into wrinkles to relax the surrounding muscles. It may benefit forehead and frown lines, crow's feet, lower eyelids, lines on the side of the nose, and the area between the upper lip and the nose. It is also useful for treating involuntary muscle movements that can occur after a face-lift.

The injections need to be repeated every few months, since the effects wear off. The treatment decreases the ability to frown or squint and may cause the corners of the mouth to turn down. When used for areas around eyes, it produces a rounder appearance afterward, which patients should be aware of before they undertake the procedure.

The drug does not cross the blood-brain barrier, and, to date, the only side effects are temporary muscle weakness near the injection site. Although there have been some reports that Botox can reduce migraine and tension headaches, Botox also causes headaches in about 1% of cases. In some cases, the headaches can be very severe and long lasting (from 8 days to a month). Some researchers suggest that either a contaminated batch of Botox or a specific injection technique may be the cause, but additional investigation is needed.

Plastic Surgery

In 2005, there were over 2.1 million cosmetic surgeries, up 1% from the year before. Most of these surgeries were liposuction and breast surgeries. However, over 200,000 each of eyelid and nose surgeries were performed. Facial plastic surgeries range from being fairly minimal, such as a brow lift, to a full face-lift.

Several face-lift procedures (called rhytidectomies) are available. Face-lifts can provide individuals with a more youthful look. The degree of improvement, however, depends on many factors, including age, bone structure, skin type, and personal habits, such as smoking and sunbathing.

The Procedure. When a face-lift is a relatively simple procedure, it can take about 2 hours under local anesthetic in a doctor's office. Complicated face-lifts are done under general anesthesia in a hospital and can take 3 - 6 hours. The face-lift procedure may be one of the following:

Superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is the most common face-lift procedure. The surgeon makes an incision at the hairline and separates the skin from the underlying tissue and muscles. The muscles are tightened and excess fat and tissue, such as fat under the chin and neck, are removed.
The endoscopic subperiosteal or subgaleal face-lift is a less invasive surgical technique. The surgeon raises facial structures rather than cutting away flaps of skin. Only a few half-inch incisions are made, and scarring is minimal. Not all individuals are candidates for this procedure, however.

Neither SMAS nor the endoscopic version is effective for the middle part of the face, particularly the deep lines (naso-labial folds) that run down from the nose beside the mouth. Some time after the SMAS face-lift, the upper face begins to age again while the lower area keeps its shape, causing the face to look imbalanced. Researchers are looking at other approaches, such as one called composite face-lift, that lift most muscles in the face.

Recovery Process. Recovery normally lasts from several weeks to several months. Swelling and discoloration are common. Some patients report tingling or numbing sensations after surgery. These sensations generally decrease as damaged nerves regenerate.

Complications. A face-lift is not without risks. A postsurgical hematoma is a collection of blood that can occur after a face-lift. In one study, major hematomas occurred in 2.2% of patients and minor hematomas in 6.65% of patients. They generally develop within 2 weeks of the surgery and require draining. Even minor hematomas need fast treatment to prevent greater complications. Such complications can include infection, changes in skin color, fluid buildup, and prolonged recovery time.

Other less common complications may include the following:

Infection
Excessive bleeding
Imbalanced facial muscles
Delayed healing
Scarring
Permanent injury to the nerves that control facial movements

These complications are rare, particularly with a skilled surgeon, but the more complex the face-lifts, the greater the risk.

Blepharoplasty. Blepharoplasty is the primary surgical procedure for eye lifts. Results usually last 5 -10 years. Although simple, it has potential complications, including permanent difficulty in closing the eyes or making a stern expression. Newer techniques, however, are preventing this complication. Assuming the surgeon is experienced, laser surgery is now preferred to the standard surgical scalpel approach. Laser surgery reduces bleeding and bruising, and both the operation and recovery are faster. Temporary blurred or double vision is common. More serious complications include infection, bleeding, dry eyes, difficulty in closing the eyes, and pulling down of the lower lids. Rare cases of blindness have been reported.

Transconjunctival Upper Blepharoplasty. An innovative procedure called transconjunctival upper blepharoplasty removes fat from the membrane that lines the eyelids (the conjunctiva) and is an effective technique for treating both the upper and lower eyelids. Unlike traditional blepharoplasty, this procedure does not cause scarring in the nasal area. In patients who have scars from previous surgeries, transconjunctival removal of fat can also make existing scars less obvious. Long-term side effects and effectiveness of this procedure have not been studied.

Laser Liposculpture and Platysma Resurfacing. A procedure called laser neck and jowl liposculpture and platysma resurfacing may prove to be an alternative to face-lifts. The procedure requires only a one-inch incision under the chin and removing excess fat. After the fat is removed, the surgeon tightens the platysma, the thin muscular sheet under the skin of the neck, which improves the shape of the neck. Only local anesthetic is needed, and the patient can return to normal activities in 2 days. The patient's skin should be elastic enough to be able to reform without sagging.

Resources

www.aad.org -- American Academy of Dermatology
www.asds.net -- American Society for Dermatologic Surgery
www.plasticsurgery.org -- American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
www.surgery.org -- American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
www.skincarephysicians.com/agingskinnet -- Aging Skin Net

References

Autier P, Gandini S. Vitamin D Supplementation and Total Mortality : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1730-1737.

Cho HS, Lee MH, Lee JW, et al. Anti-wrinkling effects of the mixture of vitamin C, vitamin E, pycnogenol and evening primrose oil, and molecular mechanisms on hairless mouse skin caused by chronic ultraviolet B irradiation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2007;23(5):155-62.

Edison BL, Green BA, Wildnauer RH, Sigler ML. A polyhydroxy acid skin care regimen provides antiaging effects comparable to an alpha-hydroxyacid regimen. Cutis. 2004;73(2 Suppl):14-17.

Gordon, ML. A conservative approach to the nonsurgical rejuvenation of the face. Dermatol Clin. 2005 Apr;23(2):365-71.

Helfrich YR, Yu L, Ofori A, et al. Effect of smoking on aging of photoprotected skin: evidence gathered using a new photonumeric scale. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(3):397-402.

Hercberg S, Ezzedine K, Guinot C, et al. Antioxidant supplementation increases the risk of skin cancers in women but not in men. J Nutr. 2007;137(9):2098-105

Kang S. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of tazarotene 0.1% cream in the treatment of photodamage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005; 52(2): 268-274.

Mitsuhashi Y, Kawaguchi M, Hozumi Y, Kondo S. Topical vitamin D3 is effective in treating senile warts possibly by inducing apoptosis. Dermatol. 2005;32(6):420-423.

Rubino C, Farace F, Dessy LA, Sanna MP, Mazzarello V. A prospective study of anti-aging topical therapies using a quantitative method of assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(4):1156-1162.

Samuel M, Brooke RC, Hollis S, Griffiths CE. Interventions for photodamaged skin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001782.

Sudel KM, Venzke K, Mielke H, et al. Novel aspects of intrinsic and extrinsic aging of human skin: beneficial effects of soy extract. Photochem Photobiol. 2005;81(3):581-587.

Thornfeldt C. Cosmeceuticals containing herbs: fact, fiction, and future. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(7 Pt 2):873-880.

Vochelle D. The use of poly-L-lactic acid in the management of soft-tissue augmentation: a five-year experience. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2004;23(4):223-226.

Yarosh D, Klein J, O'Connor A, Effect of topically applied T4 endonuclease V in liposomes on skin cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum: a randomised study. Xeroderma Pigmentosum Study Group. Lancet. 2001;357(9260):926-9.

Review Date:
10/23/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com