FitSugar

Stevie Nicks Uses the Power Plate to Stay in Shape

FitSugar — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:00:00 -0700

Cindy Crawford isn't the only hot mama who mixes in the Power Plate to her workouts. Still rocking 60-year-old Stevie Nicks credits her fit-for-touring physique to the vibrating device that she uses for 13 minutes every other day. She notes, "You can't get results faster than that."

The Power Plate made its debut into the fitness world back in 2006, and its growing popularity is evident in the number of mainstream gyms that now offer this piece of equipment. People have reacted positively to the efficient workout that claims to cause "rapid and intense muscle contractions 30-50 times per second."

Ms. Fleetwood Mac complements her Power Plate fitness fixation with a healthy attitude toward weight. She suggests striving to achieve a weight that's maintainable, saying, "You don't have to weigh 105 lbs. Weigh 125 lbs. and stay there."

This vocal legend could be on to something. Have you tested the Power Plate?

Source

You Asked: Power Plate Pros and Cons

FitSugar — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:30:00 -0700

You're asking and I'm answering.

Dear Fit,
My gym is getting "Power Plates" installed and I am curious about the benefits of standing on a vibrating platform compared with a one hour workout in the gym? They are claiming it can have the same effect but I am not convinced! Of course, I'm going to try one but how is this beneficial for overall long-term health?
– fluffyhelen

The Power Plate revolution is beginning to fully materialize and I think it is cool that your gym is springing for some fancy new equipment. However, I am with you and am a little incredulous that 10 minutes on a Whole Body Vibration Machine (WBV) can replace a 60 minute traditional workout. To hear the pros and cons of the Power Plate, just read more.

I must begin by stating that I have never tried a Power Plate or any other WBV machine exercise, and although I am skeptical, like you I am also intrigued. A WBV platform vibrates mildly activating muscles to contract 30 to 50 times a second. Cedric Bryant, the chief physiologist with the American Council on Exercise, feels that WBV could be a good supplement to a sensible diet and exercise program. Some small studies have found that performing squats on a WBV machine is slightly more effective at increasing muscle power as well as jump height than performing squats on stable ground. However, with no external load forcing muscles to exert themselves some members of the sports medicine world don't think that vibrations alone could do much good for healthy, young individuals. The benefits of using a vibration machine for people with multiple sclerosis is dramatic, and other research has found that using WBV has inhibited bone density loss in post menopausal women.

Regarding long term health, the major concern is that high-amplitude vibration can be dangerous over time since it sends jarring waves throughout the body. This jarring motion could create low back pain, cartilage damage, blurred vision from retinal tears, hearing loss and even brain damage (gray matter being shaken too hard in the skull). It is not recommended to use the machines for over 30 minutes a day.

One thing is for certain, your core will get worked using a Power Plate. I can't wait to hear what you think of the machines. Be sure to let us all know.

Source.

Vibration Workouts: Some Benefit Claims on Shaky Ground

FitSugar — Thu, 31 May 2007 10:15:00 -0700

I have never tried a Power Plate, but something about it just reminds me of those vibrating belt machines from the 1950s. You know, where you put the vibrating belt around your bum and it was supposed to jiggle all the fat off.

Basically, there are two major players in vibrational exercise these days, one being the Power Plate, which is a small standing platform that vibrates really fast with a handle (it kind of looks like a floor polisher or a vacuum cleaner on steroids). The other Whole Body Vibration, made by Soloflex, is an over sized vibrating skateboard with no handles. You can pretty much do any move on these machines, from squats to yoga poses, from push-ups to standing hammer curls. The workout is closer to weightlifting than aerobics, like strength, core and balance training all rolled into one.

The list of claimed benefits from this type of workout is rather long: improves flexibility and strength, reduces pain and stress, builds muscle and reverses osteoporosis, but the most praised benefit by far is the decrease in workout time. Getting all shook up while doing alternating lunges really taxes your muscles. NASA is even investigating vibrational strength training as a means of reducing muscle atrophy and bone loss that accompany long trips in space.

Interested in the downside of this kind of workout? Then read more

However, some researchers are not completely sold on these vibration workouts. The major concern being that high-amplitude vibration can be dangerous over time since it sends jarring waves throughout the body. This jarring motion could create low back pain, cartilage damage, blurred vision from retinal tears, hearing loss and even brain damage (gray matter being shaken too hard in the skull). Soloflex even recommends using the device only 30 minutes a day. More than that and you exceed industry standards for safe vibrations in the workplace. I never thought I would hear OSHA rules applied to fitness machines.

Keeping all this in mind, I still want to try a vibrational work out, do you? Let me know in the comments below.

What's the Deal with: The Power Plate

FitSugar — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:35:27 -0800

The Power Plate is the latest in workout equipment.
The Product maker, Power Plate USA, says:

Advanced Vibration Technology exploits the body's innate reflexive response to disruptions in stability in order to stimulate enhanced muscle strength and performance. The Power Plate produces a vibration through which energy is transferred to the body. This mechanical stimulus produces a stretch reflex which, depending on the frequency, results in rapid and intense muscle contractions 30-50 times per second.

In simpler terms, the Power Plate is this machine that vibrates extremely fast. You stand on it and try and hold on for dear life until your session is over. I like to describe it as similar to when you are riding the bus or subway and it's full, so you have to stand (and that stinks). During your ride you hold on tight while it stops and starts again and your entire body automatically tightens up to keep upright. That's your reflexes doing their job, and the same type of thing happens when you train on the Power Plate.

The product is supposedly used by Clint Eastwood, Jane Fonda and even the king of Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately, the price for the new Personal Power Plate is still out of my league at $3875, so I'll just vibrate when I am at the gym. But if it's in your league, buy it here

Fit's Tip: Each set on the machine is only 30, 45, or 60 seconds in length -- you're training sessions on the Power Plate don't need to be more than 3 to 4 times per week with each session lasting about 10 minutes of actual time on the Power Plate.

Celebs Like to Shake It

FitSugar — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:50:58 -0700

At first, the Power Plate seems like another gimmicky weight-loss product, but its website features endorsements from fit celebs like Madonna, Courteney Cox, and Hilary Swank. On top of that, it's used by over 60 college and pro sports teams, and the Police brought one with them on their reunion tour. That's some serious ~~celeb~~ street cred.

The secret behind the Power Plate is its vibrating plates. The manufacturer claims that if you stand on it for 10 minutes a day, three times a week, you'll lose weight, tone your body, and improve bone density. To really maximize the benefits of the machine, it's encouraged that you do the same exercises you would do on the floor - sit-ups, for example - on the Power Plate.

Cougar Town actress Cox says the Power Plate was essential in shaping her up for her new role: "The Power Plate machine has dramatically changed my workout. I know that every muscle in my body is being ignited in ways that you can't do with traditional training."

To see a video of Cox's trainer Michelle Lovett demonstrating the Power Plate, read more.

They call the technology behind the machine Acceleration Training: the vibrations transmit energy waves to the body that are able to contract muscles 25 to 50 times per second. This is suppose to help stimulate blood flow, work the muscles harder than ever before, and increase strength and flexibility.

Vibration training is not a new thing in the fitness world (remember the black rubber belts that used to go around the waist to shake off fat?), but it's been picking up steam especially as it garners more backing from the medical community and health professionals.

Studies done on the effects of vibration training show that if used properly, it's more beneficial at building lean muscle mass, improving weight loss, and increasing strength and speed than exercise regimens without vibration training. Researchers warn that the machines should not be used for more than 30 minutes a day due to health concerns about engaging the body in high-amplitude vibrations like back pain or blurred vision.

I remain a little skeptical, mostly because I can't get the Shake Weights infomercial out of my head, but my curiosity is piqued. My gym doesn't have a Power Plate yet, does yours? I'd love to hear what you think of this new workout.

5 Foods That Feed Your Muscles

FitSugar — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:00:40 -0700

Your muscles are constantly working for you, so feed them well. Recent news indicates that muscle mass, especially in the lower of half of the body, is essential for good health. Muscle mass helps keep blood sugar levels even, thus fighting type 2 diabetes. Plus, muscle requires more energy to simply exist than fat, so more muscle means you burn more calories. The added strength is a bonus too. Here are five foods to put on your plate to help you maximize your muscle power.
Getty

View Slideshow ›

Glaucoma

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:34 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Drug Approval

Bimatoprost (Lumigan) has been approved as a first-line treatment for open-angle glaucoma.

Glaucoma Cases Increasing Worldwide

About 60 million people worldwide will have glaucoma by 2010, and the number will increase to nearly 80 million by 2010, according to a recent study in the British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Weightlifting May Increase Glaucoma Risk

Weightlifting can cause a temporary increase in intraocular eye pressure (IOP), and holding your breath while lifting weights further increases IOP, suggests a 2006 study in the Archives of Ophthalmology. Doctors should ask patients with normal-tension glaucoma if they engage in weightlifting exercise.

IOP and Posture

IOP increases in some people when they are lying prone during sleep, yet glaucoma exams measure IOP in patients while they are sitting upright and awake, notes a 2006 study in the Archives of Ophthalmology. The researchers caution that posture may affect the interpretation of IOP readings.

Pregnancy and Glaucoma

The course of glaucoma is unpredictable during pregnancy -- IOP may remain stable in some women and increase in others, indicates a 2006 study. Although glaucoma eye drops can increase the risk of some pregnancy problems, especially during the first trimester, some pregnant women may need to continue to take glaucoma medication. Be sure your ophthalmologist carefully evaluates your individual case and explains the risks and benefits of taking medication during pregnancy.

Diabetes and Glaucoma

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk for open-angle glaucoma (the most common type of glaucoma). People with type 2 diabetes need to get regular glaucoma screenings.

Glaucoma Surgery

Tube shunts may work better than trabulectomy surgery for some patients with glaucoma, suggests a 2007 study.
Phacoviscocanalostomy, a surgery procedure that combines phacoemulsification (used for cataract surgery) and viscocanalostomy (used for glaucoma surgery), is safe and effective for patients who have both glaucoma and cataracts, indicates a 2006 study.

Introduction

Glaucoma is defined as a disease of the optic nerve, in which the nerve cells in the front of the optic nerve (the ganglion cells) die. The process is irreversible. Previously, it was believed that glaucoma was almost always due to increased intraocular pressure. However, glaucoma has been observed in many patients with normal and even low eye pressure, so the definition now rests on the damage to the optic nerve.

The Aqueous Humor. In understanding of glaucoma, it is important to first consider aqueous humor, the clear, watery fluid that circulates continuously through the front (anterior) chamber of the healthy eye and is a primary focus of glaucoma research. (This fluid is not related to tears, nor is it the dense jelly-like substance called vitreous humor that is contained in the rear chamber.) It serves two important functions in the eye:

It nourishes the area around the colored iris and behind the cornea.
It exerts pressure to help maintain the eye’s shape.

Draining the Fluid and Intraocular Pressure. The aqueous fluid is continuously produced within the front of the eye, causing pressure known as intraocular pressure (IOP). To offset the in-flowing fluid and to maintain normal IOP, the fluid drains out between the iris and cornea (an area known as the drainage angle). It does so through two channels within this angle:

The trabecular meshwork, a sponge-like, porous network, and its connecting passageways are referred to as the "conventional" outflow pathway. Most of the eye fluid outflow occurs in this region and flows from the trabecular meshwork to a group of vessels encircling the anterior chamber, called Schlemm's canal. From here, the fluid enters collection chambers and then flows out into the general blood circulatory system of the body.
The uveoscleral pathway is located behind the trabecular meshwork and is called the "unconventional" pathway. Up to 30% of the fluid flows out through this channel.

Intraocular Eye Pressure. Previously, it was believed that glaucoma was almost always due to an abnormal rise in intraocular pressure.

Glaucoma is a condition of increased fluid pressure inside the eye. The increased pressure causes compression of the retina and the optic nerve which can eventually lead to nerve damage. Glaucoma can cause partial vision loss, with blindness as a possible eventual outcome.

Increased IOP is, indeed, present in most cases of glaucoma, but some patients have normal IOP, which is usually maintained at measurements of 10 - 20 mm Hg. Measurements above this, however, do not necessarily predict glaucoma. For example, only about 10% of people with IOP levels between 21 - 30 mm Hg will actually develop glaucoma. This still puts such individuals at considerable risk for glaucoma, however.

Most people with glaucoma have the form called primary-open-angle glaucoma (also called chronic open-angle glaucoma). Open-angle glaucoma is essentially a plumbing problem.

The disease process may occur as follows:

The drainage angle remains open, but tiny drainage channels in the trabecular meshwork pathway become clogged. This pathway is responsible for most aqueous humor fluid outflow. An imbalance then occurs as fluid continues to be produced but does not drain out efficiently. Experts have still not definitely determined the precise area in the pathway where the blockage is most likely to occur. (In rare instances the pressure is high because the eye produces too much aqueous humor.)
The fluid in the eye’s anterior chamber builds up and increases pressure within the eye. This is called intraocular pressure (IOP).
The intraocular pressure exerts force on the optic nerve at the back of the eye.
Over time, the persistent pressure or other factors irreversibly damages the delicate long fibers of the optic nerve, called axons, which convey images to the brain.
As these axons die, the small cup-like head of the optic nerve may eventually collapse into an enlarged irregular shape.

Optic nerve damage is the basic glaucoma condition. If it is untreated, eventually the nerve deteriorates until a person loses sight, first in the peripheral vision (the vision in the "corner of the eyes"). If it becomes severe, the person loses central vision (in the middle of the eyes), and may eventually become blind. (Blindness is fortunately nearly always preventable with early treatment.)

Primary open-angle glaucoma tends to start in one eye but eventually involves both. In about half of patients the damage in the eye is diffuse, that is the nerve damage is generalized. In the other half the disease is localized, causing wedge-shaped abnormalities in the nerve fiber layers of the retina.

Intraocular eye pressure is normal (between 12 - 22 mmHg) in about 25 - 30% of U.S. glaucoma cases, a condition known as normal-tension glaucoma. (In Japan, the rates may be as high as 70%.) Other factors are present that cause optic nerve damage but do not affect IOP.

Closed-angle glaucoma (also called angle-closure glaucoma) is responsible for 15% of all cases. It is less common than open-angle glaucoma in the U.S., but it constitutes about half of the world's glaucoma cases because of its higher prevalence among Asians. The iris is pushed against the lens, sometimes sticking to it, closing off the drainage angle. This can occur very suddenly, resulting in an immediate rise in pressure. It often occurs in genetically susceptible people when the pupil shrinks suddenly. Closed-angle glaucoma can also be chronic and gradual, a less common condition.

Congenital glaucoma, in which the eye's drainage canals fail to develop correctly, is present from birth. It is very rare, occurring in about 1 in 10,000 newborns. This may be an inherited condition and often can be corrected with microsurgery.

The Light-Processing Parts. To understand sight, one begins with light and its passage through the eye's sensitive camera-like structures:

Light first passes through the cornea, a clear tissue at the front of the eye.
Behind the cornea, the iris (the colored tissues of the eye) opens and closes like a camera shutter to regulate the passage of light.
The lens, located behind the iris, focuses the light, which then hits the retina.
The retina is an electric fragile membrane of nerve cells called photoreceptors that receive light and translate it into signals.
A layer of cells, called the retinal ganglia, receive signals from the retina. These nerve cells are the front ends of the optic nerve cable, which, in turn, receive the signals.
The optic nerve is actually a cable of about 1.2 million nerve fibers called axons. It carries the signals to the brain, which interprets them as images.
They exit the eye through the optic disc, located in the back of the eye.

The Supportive Chambers. To help support and protect these sensitive structures, the eye contains two fluid-filled chambers:

The posterior (rear) chamber is the large area behind the iris.
Fluid passes from the posterior into the anterior (forward) chamber located in the bulging area between the iris and the front of the eye.

Causes

No single factor has been identified as a cause of primary open-angle glaucoma. A number of conditions, alone or in combination, are needed to trigger the processes leading to pressure in the first place and then to the nerve damage that destroys sight. The damage done to the optic nerve in glaucoma is triggered in most cases by the excessive pressure on the optic nerve that, over time, causes damage. Because optic nerve damage occurs in patients with normal as well as high intraocular pressure, however, researchers are investigating several other abnormal events that occur and can damage the optic nerve.

A number of genes have now been identified as possible factors in many cases of glaucoma. A gene called MYOC is of particular interest. Defects in this gene occur in between 3 - 6% of patients with adult-onset and juvenile open-angle glaucoma. They appear to overproduce a sticky protein called myocilin, which clogs the trabecular meshwork. The genes WDR36 and OPTN may cause primary open-angle glaucoma. Researchers hope that identification of genes will help improve screening of high-risk patients.

Specific syndromes have been identified with glaucoma. Many have an inherited component, although in most cases other factors must be present to activate the disease process.

Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome (also known as exfoliation syndrome) is the most common identifiable condition associated with glaucoma. In one study, 9% of patients with open-angle glaucoma had the syndrome. PEX occurs when dandruff-like matter flakes off the outer layer of the lens and collects in the drainage angle. The substance is composed of proteins produced by the lens, iris, and other parts of the eye. People can have this condition and not develop glaucoma, but they are at high risk. In one Australian study, 14% of the people with this condition had glaucoma compared to 2% of those without exfoliation. PEX has a strong genetic component but other factors (possibly sunlight, an autoimmune response, or slow virus) may be needed to trigger the disease.

Pigment Glaucoma. Pigment glaucoma starts with a condition called pigment dispersion syndrome, an inherited condition in which granules of pigment (the substance that colors the iris) flakes off into the intraocular fluid. In about 30% of cases, these fragments clog the trabecular meshwork and pressure builds up, causing glaucoma. In one study, 2% of patients had this form of glaucoma.

Irido Corneal Endothelia Syndrome. In irido corneal endothelial syndrome (ICE), cells on the back surface of the cornea spread to the drainage angle, sometimes forming scars that connect the iris to the cornea.

Neovascular Glaucoma. Neovascular glaucoma is always associated with other disorders, usually diabetes, that result in abnormal formation of new blood vessels on the iris and in the drainage system.

Aniridia. Aniridia is a rare inherited disorder (in which the iris is abnormal and increases the risk for glaucoma) that is difficult to treat. (A surgical approach called goniosurgery may help prevent glaucoma in young people with aniridia.)

Congenital Glaucoma. When an infant is born with glaucoma (congenital glaucoma), it is usually caused by an inherited abnormality in the drainage canal. Researchers have identified the gene responsible for 85% of these cases.

A natural process called apoptosis (cellular self-destruction) may contribute to damage in the retinal ganglion nerve cells, the nerve cells that are the front line of the optic nerve. Cell death can occur with or without elevated eye pressure. It is not clear what triggers apoptosis and cell death in such cases, but there are a number of suspects.

Excess Glutamate. Researchers have observed abnormally high levels of glutamate in people and animals with glaucoma. Glutamate is an amino acid that excites nerve cells. In the eye this occurs during vision. Some experts theorize that in glaucoma, either reduced blood flow or increased pressure on nerve cells triggers the release of excess glutamate. In large amounts, glutamate causes the nerve cells to fire intensively, which eventually destroys them.

Reduced Blood Flow. Researchers have observed reduced blood flow to the optic nerve in patients with glaucoma associated with both high and normal IOP. Less blood flow suggests oxygen loss, which may play a role in the destructive process. Some studies suggest that the greatest risk factor for nerve damage in patients is when blood pressure to the eye drops during the night. Ocular pressure at this time is highest, so the risk for nerve damage becomes intensified. Of interest in this regard are reports finding a significant reduction in eye blood pressure at night in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.

Excess Nitric Oxide. Elevated levels of nitric oxide, another nerve-stimulating compound, also plays a role in the nerve-damaging process. Nitric oxide is critical for nerve function and flexible blood vessels, but excess amounts may be toxic to nerves.

Glaucoma and Alzheimer's Disease. Some research has pointed out similarities in the process leading to cell death in glaucoma and Alzheimer's disease. Specifically, in both diseases activation of certain enzymes called caspases occurs and leads to accumulation of fragments of beta amyloid, an insoluble protein that forms sticky patches.

Autoimmunity. Some experts are studying the possibility that normal tension glaucoma may be an autoimmune disease; that is, factors in the immune system, including antibodies, attack cells in the person's own body as if they were foreign substances. In the case of glaucoma, such antibodies would damage parts of the optic nerve.

H. pylori Infection. Some research indicates that glaucoma is associated with Helicobacter (H.) pylori, the bacterium implicated as a major cause of peptic ulcers. Studies have reported over 87% of patients with glaucoma are infected with this bacterium.

People with acute closed-angle glaucoma often have a structural defect that causes a narrow angle between the iris and cornea where the aqueous humor circulates. Conditions that suddenly dilate the pupils may cause this shallow angle to close and precipitate attacks of acute glaucoma in susceptible people. Such conditions may include:

Certain drugs such as antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants, some asthma medications (nebulized ipratropium), some anti-seizure drugs (topiramate)
Darkness
Emotional stress

When intraocular pressure leading to glaucoma is caused by other diseases or conditions, it is known as secondary glaucoma. Secondary glaucoma may be chronic or acute, mild or severe.

Medical Conditions. A number of diseases can contribute to the development of intraocular pressure leading to glaucoma:

Diseases that affect blood flow to the optic nerve (diabetes, high blood pressure, migraine; people with type 2 diabetes should be regularly screened for glaucoma.)
Hypothyroidism
Sleep apnea
Physical injury in the eye
Extreme nearsightedness (myopia)
Previous eye surgery
Other disorders, including leukemia, sickle cell anemia, and some forms of arthritis

Corticosteroids. Corticosteroids, commonly called steroids, have multiple effects on the trabecular meshwork and may even cause genetic changes. In fact, studying the effects of steroids on the eye is helping researchers understand the glaucoma disease process. Steroids pose a higher or lower risk depending on the form:

Taking topical steroid treatments in the eye poses the highest risk. It must be monitored carefully since, in some cases, damage may be permanent.
Taking oral corticosteroids, particularly in high doses or for long periods, increases the chance of glaucoma. In such cases, the eye disorder typically develops almost immediately and reverses within 2 weeks after the drug has been withdrawn.
Inhaled steroids were not thought to cause glaucoma, but there is some risk in people with a family history of glaucoma and other risk factors.

Symptoms

Chronic glaucoma is insidious. If the pressure increases slowly, it will not produce any symptoms until it has done irreversible damage. In such cases, people may notice visual problems at first only when light is dim. Patients are often sensitive to glare. Eventually they may lose contrast sensitivity; that is, they might have trouble differentiating between varying shades and brightness.

In acute closed-angle glaucoma, the pressure inside the eye increases quickly, and the symptoms are dramatic. Intense pain in the eyebrow area and blurred vision develop usually in one eye, and the patient often feels like the eye will burst (although it won't). The eye usually reddens. A person may see rainbow-like halos around lights. Sometimes nausea and vomiting occur. These symptoms may occur on and off and not appear as a full attack. In either case, they indicate a medical emergency. In chronic closed-angle glaucoma, the process is gradual and painless.

Although congenital glaucoma is usually present at birth, symptoms generally don’t develop in the infant for a few months. If parents notice that an infant’s eyes are enlarging, becoming cloudy, often watering, or tending to close in the presence of light, they should have an ophthalmologist examine the child’s eyes. Port-wine stains on an infant’s face could indicate the Sturge-Weber syndrome, a disorder that occasionally causes glaucoma.

Outlook

Worldwide, glaucoma ranks as one of the leading causes of blindness. Even if people with glaucoma do not become blind, vision can be impaired. In developed countries, most people get treatment in time to preserve their vision. Even so, glaucoma causes between 3 - 6% of blindness cases in Caucasians, and even more cases in African Americans.

In a 20-year study of Caucasian patients with glaucoma, blindness in at least one eye occurred in 27% of patients and blindness in both eyes occurred in 9% of patients. The blindness rates in African Americans are most likely higher. In fact, glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness in African Americans. Despite this higher prevalence, this ethnic group receives surgical treatment at half the rate of Caucasians.

The Process Leading to Vision Loss. Chronic glaucoma is often called “the silent thief of sight," because the afflicted person has no warning sign, no hint that anything is wrong. Untreated, the destruction develops slowly over time:

Over years or decades, the increased pressure compresses nerves at the back of the eyes.
Glaucoma gradually destroys first the outer fibers of the optic nerve, which reduces peripheral vision (the top, sides, and bottom areas of vision), but not central vision.
By the time a person notices that peripheral vision has been lost, permanent damage has already occurred.
If the eye pressure remains high, the destruction can progress until tunnel vision develops, and the person is only able to see objects that are straight ahead.
The last nerve fibers destroyed are those responsible for central vision; if this occurs, the glaucoma victim becomes totally blind.

Although there is no cure for open-angle glaucoma, a number of treatments are available that lower intraocular pressure and slow progression of vision loss.

Risk Factors for Vision Loss. Estimates of progression rates in vision deterioration range from 9 - 30% over a 2 - 7 year period.

According to a study on patients with elevated IOP, for every 1-mm Hg increase in IOP, there is a 10% higher risk of disease progression. A very elevated IOP (above 30 mm Hg) is certainly hazardous. An elevated IOP that is below 30 mm Hg, however, is not necessarily the most important factor in determining the risk for disease progression. Some evidence suggests that frequent and large daily fluctuations in intraocular pressure, not simply high IOP, are associated with the greatest risk for loss of vision. Having normal-tension glaucoma with optic nerve damage also carries a high risk for progression, even if eye pressure is reduced.

In any case, factors other than IOP play a role in increasing the chances for progression and vision loss in patients with slightly elevated IOP and normal tension glaucoma:

Both eyes affected
Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome. PEX occurs when proteins produced in the eye flake off the outer layer of the lens and collects in the drainage angle.
Bleeding in a specific region called the peripapillary nerve fiber layer
Thin corneas. (People who have thick corneas and elevated IOP may only need to be monitored if they have no other risk factor for vision loss.)
Larger cup-to-optic disc ratio. (The cup of the optic disc is the center portion, which enlarges as nerve damage progresses.)

Non-eye related factors associated with disease progression include being elderly, African American, female, or having a history of migraines.

Acute closed-angle glaucoma is a medical emergency; if the high pressure is not reduced within hours, it may permanently damage vision. Anyone who experiences its symptoms should immediately contact an ophthalmologist or go to a hospital emergency room.

Risk Factors

About 2 million Americans have open-angle glaucoma, but an exact count is unclear. Experts estimate that by 2010, over 60 million people worldwide will have glaucoma, with 74% of these cases due to open-angle glaucoma. Half of people with glaucoma are unaware of this problem because the condition causes no symptoms.

Elevated intraocular pressure in the eye occurs in 5 - 10 million Americans, but only about 10% of such people develop glaucoma because of this pressure. And, in 15% of actual glaucoma cases, IOP is normal. Major studies are helping to clarify the people who are at highest risk for glaucoma and optic nerve damage, including those with normal tension glaucoma.

Elderly. The prevalence of chronic glaucoma increases with age. In a major study, 0.6% of people age 60 - 64 had primary open-angle glaucoma. Among people who were 10 years older, the prevalence had more than doubled to 1.3%, and among those who were age 80 - 84, it had more than doubled again to 3%.

People of African Descent. Across all age groups, according to a 2000 report, the prevalence of glaucoma in African Americans is about 3.5% compared to about 1% in Caucasians. In addition, U.S. studies suggest that glaucoma develops earlier in African American population groups (starting at age 45 instead of age 60 in Caucasians). And, their risk for blindness once they have glaucoma is 14 - 17 times that of Caucasians with glaucoma. African American men are at higher risk than women. African American children who are extremely near-sighted and have relatives with glaucoma should begin regular eye examinations for glaucoma as early as possible.

In a major glaucoma study in Barbados, where most people are of African descent, over 10% of those age 50 and older had open angle glaucoma, and over 15% were afflicted after age 70. About half of the cases had normal or lower eye pressure. An interesting 2001 study suggested that African Americans tend to have significantly thinner central corneas than Caucasians. This could lead to misleadingly lower pressure scores in African American patients who actually may have high IOPs.

Family History. Glaucoma tends to run in families. Brothers and sisters of patients with open angle glaucoma are 5 times more likely to develop glaucoma by the time they are 70 years old than people whose siblings do not have the disease. Previous studies have also found that people with family histories of glaucoma are more likely to already have some vision loss when they are first diagnosed with glaucoma.

Effects of Blood Pressure. The association between a person's blood pressure and intraocular pressure in the eye is not entirely clear. A number of studies have found a higher risk for glaucoma in people with high blood pressure. A 2002 study suggested, however, that people with blood pressure that is low relative to their intraocular pressure may be at higher risk for glaucoma. The same study found no higher risk for glaucoma in people with hypertension, and in fact, high blood pressure was associated with a lower risk.

Having Certain Medical Disorders. Individuals with certain medical or physical conditions, including diabetes, migraine, nearsightedness, and sleep apnea, appear to have a higher risk. Conditions that require the use of any oral or inhaled steroid, particularly high doses for prolonged periods of time, can cause glaucoma. Previous eye surgery also puts people at risk.

Weightlifting. According to a 2006 study, holding your breath while weightlifting can increase the risk for developing normal-tension glaucoma. Weightlifting causes temporary increases in eye pressure; holding your breath during this exercise leads to even greater intraocular pressure.

Risk Factors for Closed-Angle Glaucoma. Chronic closed-angle glaucoma tends to be more common in people of Asian and African descent. Those who have this condition are often extremely farsighted. Acute closed-angle glaucoma occurs much more frequently in women than in men.

Risk Factors for Normal Tension Glaucoma. Risk factors for normal tension glaucoma include Japanese ancestry and a family history of the disease. It is more common in women than in men. A family history of cardiovascular disease also increases the risk.

Risk Factors for Pigmentary Glaucoma. Pigmentary glaucoma occurs three times more often in men then in women and at a younger age.

Risk Factors for Irido Corneal Endothelial Syndrome. This condition occurs more often in light-skinned women.

Diagnosis

A diagnosis of glaucoma no longer simply relies on the presence of pressure within the eye. It requires that there be optic nerve damage or a strong suggestion of damage, which can be clearly seen during a dilated eye examination of the optic nerve. In general, the hallmark sign of this condition is a loss of peripheral vision. With peripheral vision loss, a person can see in front of him- or herself but has lost the vision to the side.

The optic nerve carries the information of vision from the eye to the brain.

Because chronic glaucoma has no warning symptoms, half of its victims are unaware that they have the condition. Early diagnosis, however, is the key to successful treatment of glaucoma. One study reported that the more years since the last visit to an eye professional, the greater the risk for having visual loss.

Everyone over age 65 and African Americans over 40 years old should have periodic eye exams, including tests for glaucoma, every other year.
African Americans between ages 20 - 39 should have eye examinations every 3 - 5 years.
Other people at higher risk (people with diabetes, history of eye injuries, a family history of glaucoma, or those taking corticosteroid medications) should have eye examinations every year after age 35.
People with known glaucoma should have frequent examinations to check peripheral vision and to be sure treatment is maintaining a safe eye pressure. After such examinations, the ophthalmologist will assess current treatment and make necessary adjustments.

Doctors determine the intraocular pressure (IOP) of the aqueous humor inside the eye using tonometry, which measures the force necessary to make an indentation in the eye. There are several methods:

In the Schiotz method, the doctor first anesthetizes the eye with drops, then presses very lightly against it with tonometer, a tiny smooth instrument that is used to measure the pressure.
In the applanation method, the doctor touches a strip of orange-dyed paper to the side of the eye. The stain helps with the examination and rinses out with tearing. The doctor uses a slit-lamp, which is moved forward toward the patient's face until the tonometer touches the eye.
The noncontact approach applies a puff of air and measures the force needed to indent the eye.

Attempting to close the eyelids during the test can increase eye pressure and produce errors in the results.

In general, normal IOP is usually maintained at measurements of 10 - 20 mm Hg. Glaucoma pressure over 21 mm Hg indicates a potential problem. The test is not completely accurate, however. Only about 10% of people with IOP levels between 21 - 30 mm Hg will actually develop glaucoma and optic nerve damage. On the other hand, many people with glaucoma have normal pressure, at least for part of the time.

Changes in posture may also affect IOP. A 2006 study indicated that IOP increases during sleep or when a person is lying down. As IOP tests are generally given in a doctor’s office when a patient is sitting up, they may not provide a completely accurate evaluation of eye pressure.

The cornea thickness may be an important indicator of disease progression in patients with elevated IOP. According to some research, patients with thinner corneas have a significant risk for developing damage from glaucoma, while those with thicker corneas have a low risk.

In order to determine early damage in the optic nerve, a number of diagnostic instruments have been developed to assess the nerve fiber layers at the back of the eye (the fundus) and to check for optic disk cupping. (The cup of the optic disc is the center portion, which enlarges as nerve damage progresses.) The two most common procedures for identifying nerve damage are ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography. Other instruments have been developed, including those that use laser technology and computers, but none have proved to be infallible. No test has proven to be completely accurate, however, and none is routinely performed by all eye professionals.

In order to be accurate, the tests require a skilled professional and there are certain common factors:

The pupils must also be widely dilated using eye drops before the procedure.
Even mild cataracts and a slightly less-than-optimally dilated pupil can degrade the results. Such conditions are common in elderly people, who are the most likely to develop glaucoma.
If the back of the eye is lightly pigmented (colored), the area under observation is less distinct.
If the glaucoma is diffuse and there is a generalized loss of nerve fiber (which occurs in half of patients), it is more difficult to detect than if the glaucoma is more localized.

If IOP is low or normal and tests report optic nerve damage and peripheral visual loss, doctors should also check for other conditions before starting any treatment for glaucoma. Such problems include steroid use, anemia, and previous hemorrhage or severe low blood pressure.

Ophthalmoscopy. The eye professional (or even a primary care doctor) uses an ophthalmoscope to peer through the pupil directly at the optic nerve. The examiner can then check the shape and color of the nerve fibers to evaluate whether they have been damaged by the high pressure of glaucoma. Damaged nerve fibers may be indicated by:

An asymmetrical or elongated cupped optic nerve
The optic nerve color may be pale or an unhealthy-pink

If results show no optic nerve damage in patients who have mild elevations in pressure, the ophthalmologist may want to retest frequently but delay drug treatment, unless the patient has significant risk factors.

Fundus Photography. Fundus photography may be used to take pictures of the optic nerve and can reveal changes years in advance of vision loss. It is an unpleasant procedure requiring drops and a bright flash. This procedure has the same limitations as ophthalmoscopy.

Laser Polarimetry. Polarimetry uses laser technology to scan the eye and does not require any response from the patient. It is reported to be able to measure nerve fiber thickness in the eye and so be able to reveal early signs of deterioration. Preliminary studies have indicated that it has a diagnostic accuracy of over 90% for both confirming and ruling out glaucoma. One study, however, reported that laser polarimetry was sensitive enough to detect glaucoma in only up to 57% of patients with early glaucoma, 71% of those with moderate disease, and 81% of those with severe glaucoma. More research is needed.

Other Devices. Computer-assisted devices, such as the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, are now available that may be useful for evaluating the retinal nerve layer. Another instrument, the optical coherence tomograph, measures the echo time delay of light that is scattered back from different layers in the retina. The value of these tests has not yet been determined.

If there is indication of optic nerve damage, the eye professional will conduct tests of the visual fields (the areas that the patient can see). In most people with glaucoma, the first areas to become noticeably impaired are the peripheral visual fields (areas of sight that are not directly in front of a person but more to the sides).

Click the icon to see an image of the visual field test.

Standard Perimetry Tests. Perimetry tests are used to check peripheral vision. One variation of this test is as follows:

A person sits closely facing a large computer-like monitor.
Small bright white lights flicker on and off hundreds of times, at different places on the screen, while the patient clicks a button whenever one of the lights is seen.
The machine prints out a report that maps any blanked-out areas in the person’s vision.

The test is complex and lengthy; elderly people and those with short attention spans may be inappropriate candidates. Other perimetry tests, some requiring less time to administer and some using "virtual reality" techniques, are currently being developed.

Other Tests. Other visual field tests are being developed that can detect abnormalities years before they can be detected by standard perimetry. Experts recommend some of these tests in selected patients with suspected glaucoma.

For example, a screening test called frequency doubling technology (FDT) checks for changes in particular cells in the retina that are indications of early glaucoma. It takes less than a minute to perform.

Another test called short wave automated perimetry (SWAP) uses colors (blue-on-yellow) and also detects very early abnormalities in the visual field. Testing time is longer than with FDT, however, and the presence of certain types of cataracts can interfere with its accuracy.

ELAM-1. Endothelial leukocyte cell adhesion molecule 1 (ELAM-1) is a molecule that has been found in glaucoma but not in healthy eyes. This molecule may prove to be a "marker" and its presence may be helpful in diagnosing glaucoma.

A simple test using a penlight helps determine the risk for acute closed-angle glaucoma. A beam of light is directed from the side of the face toward the patient's iris. If no shadow appears on the nose, then most likely the angle is wide enough to dilate. Using an instrument called a gonioscope, ophthalmologists can also inspect the front of the eyes and assess the drainage angle between the cornea and the iris and the channels in the trabecular meshwork. This test can differentiate between closed- and open-angle glaucoma.

Treatment

Most treatments for glaucoma aim to reduce ocular pressure and its fluctuations. Early treatment with medications, surgery, or both can nearly always maintain safe pressure of the aqueous humor, thus preventing optic nerve damage and blindness. The choice between surgery and medications and when to start treatment is not always straightforward. For example, with the introduction of beta blockers and newer glaucoma drugs, there has been a decline in surgeries. It is not clear, however, which drugs are more effective than others and if, over time, any will actually prevent surgery. Patients should discuss all issues with their doctors and ophthalmologists.

Many people have high IOP but no sign of nerve damage. Over the course of 20 years, only between 10 - 30% of these people will actually develop glaucoma. Nevertheless, once glaucoma has destroyed optic nerve fibers, no known treatment can reverse the damage.

Indeed, studies suggest that in people with glaucoma, even very small differences in pressure may mean the difference between disease progression and stability. An important trial reported that, on average, treating patients when their glaucoma was first detected reduced IOP by 25%. In addition, treatment reduced the risk for progression by 17%. This study confirmed previous findings supporting early treatment for glaucoma. Another study found that treatment with eye drops halved the risk of developing open-angle glaucoma in African Americans who had elevated IOP. Some evidence suggests that early treatment to lower IOP may be beneficial even in patients with normal tension glaucoma.

However, not all individuals with early signs of glaucoma (elevated IOP or normal-tension glaucoma) develop optic nerve damage and serious vision problems. Nor does treatment prevent progression in a large minority of patients. Medications used for glaucoma also can carry significant side effects and risks.

Some experts suggest that treatment is warranted only in people with early signs of glaucoma who have risk factors for progressive disease and vision loss (thinner corneas, larger cup to optic disc ration, older age, and elevated pressure).

A number of effective drugs are now available for treating glaucoma. The drugs reduce pressure in the eye but all have a number of side effects that affect other parts of the body. Some of these side effects can be quite severe. Many of the drugs used for glaucoma also interact with common medications for other conditions. To compound the difficulties, many patients require multiple drugs. As a result, only about half of patients comply with their treatments.

Experts generally recommend topical drugs first (those that can be used as eye drops or ointments rather than taken by mouth).

Topical beta blockers are the standard first-line drugs, most commonly timolol (Timoptic). Newer beta blockers include betaxolol (Betoptic), levobunolol (Betagan), carteolol (Ocupress), and metipranolol (OptiPranolol). Timolol has been used for years, and these other drugs are also well tolerated.
Topical prostaglandins are alternatives if beta blockers fail. They include latanoprost (Xalatan) and unoprostone (Rescula). Of the standard drugs used for glaucoma, these drugs have the greatest effect on lowering IOPs. They also have fewer widespread effects than the beta blockers.
Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) are less effective than standard beta blockers or prostaglandins but have fewer widespread effects than the beta blockers. They may be helpful in certain cases. Topical forms are dorzolamide (Trusopt) and brinzolamide (Azopt). (Oral CAIs are available and more effective, but they have severe side effects and are rarely used for the long term.)
Alpha2-adrenergics, also called selective alpha adrenergics, are effective but may not be as well tolerated as timolol. They include brimonidine (Alphagan).
Miotics, which include pilocarpine and others, were the standard drugs before the introduction of topical beta blockers. They have now been largely replaced by timolol and others, although they are sometimes used in combinations.
Beta blockers and newer drugs (prostaglandins, topical CAIs, and selective alpha adrenergics) are now preferred over the older drugs, which include miotics, oral CAIs, and nonselective alpha adrenergics.

Combinations. Combinations of these drugs can be very effective, because they tend to have different actions. Single medications that contain two drugs are becoming available. For example, Cosopt combines timolol and dorzolamide; Timpilo is a combination of timolol and pilocarpine. Studies of these and other combinations compared to each other to single drugs are ongoing. To date, results on any superior combinations have been mixed. It should be noted that the side effects of each drug apply to any combination.

Treating the Pregnant Patient. Considerations for a pregnant woman with glaucoma can be complicated. All of the drugs used for glaucoma are absorbed by the body, cross the placenta, and are excreted in breast milk. Many have effects that can interfere with or adversely affect pregnancy.

Women should discuss going off medication, particularly during the first trimester, and be monitored during that time for increasing eye pressure. IOP tends to drop during pregnancy, although usually not to a significant degree. In addition, changes in IOP and visual loss vary greatly. Some women experience no IOP change or visual loss during pregnancy, while others may experience an increase in IOP or worsening of visual loss. It is important that your ophthalmologist carefully considers your individual case and discusses with you the risks and benefits of continuing glaucoma medication during pregnancy.

If women need to take medications, they should try to achieve the lowest dose possible. Some drugs have fewer side effects than others. Pregnant women must also be very careful about administering eye drops to allow as little medication as possible to enter the body. When taking eye drops, press your index finger against the corner of the eye near your nose. This helps prevent the eye drop from passing down into the tear duct where it is easily absorbed through the rest of the body. Even this approach, however, does not guarantee complete safety. Women with glaucoma who are planning to become pregnant might want to consider surgery before they conceive.

The object of standard glaucoma surgery is to reduce pressure in the eye by increasing the outflow of the aqueous fluid. Two methods are commonly used:

Filtration surgery (trabeculectomy). This uses standard surgical instruments to open a passage in the eye for draining fluid.
Laser trabeculoplasty. This procedure uses a laser to burn 80 - 100 tiny holes in the drainage area.

Both are effective, but certain patient groups may respond to one more than the other. For example, African Americans may do better with laser surgery while trabeculectomy may be a better choice for Caucasians with no serious medical problems.

In general, surgery is a last resort. Doctors may, however, recommend surgery before drug therapies for patients unlikely to comply with difficult drug regimens or for patients who may have severe reactions from the glaucoma drugs. Women who plan on becoming pregnant should also discuss surgery with their doctor.

Some studies indicate that laser treatment performed as the initial treatment for glaucoma is as effective as medications in some cases. Findings in 2003 from a major comparison study suggested that 4 years after surgery there was little difference in visual field loss between trabeculectomy and medical treatment. There was, however, a higher risk for cataracts and loss of vision sharpness with surgery. On the other hand, side effects from medications may be ongoing and troublesome. It is important to note that even surgery does not cure glaucoma, and over half of patients will require medication within 2 years. Experts who are against early surgeries also argue that studies on their success often omitted serious postoperative problems, such as late-onset infection, and quality of life assessments.

Medications

Nearly all glaucoma medications are prescribed for reducing eye pressure. Lowering IOP is even proving to be beneficial for about two-thirds of patients with normal-pressure glaucoma.

Topical beta adrenoceptor blockers (common called beta-blockers) are the drugs most often prescribed to treat glaucoma. They lower the pressure inside the eye by inhibiting the production of aqueous humor.

Brands. These drugs are categorized as either nonselective or selective beta-blockers:

Nonselective adrenoceptor beta-blockers. Timolol (Timoptic, Betimol) has been the standard beta-blocker for years. Newer nonselective drugs include levobunolol (Betagan), carteolol (Ocupress), and metipranolol (OptiPranolol). A few studies suggest some are more beneficial than timolol with similar side effects.
Selective beta1-adrenoceptor blockers. Betaxolol (Betoptic) and levobetaxolol (Betaxon) are selective beta-blockers. These drugs appear to have fewer adverse effects on the heart than the nonselective beta-blockers, although they still have widespread effects. Studies also suggest that they slow progression more than timolol, although timolol is more effective at lowering IOP. selective beta-blockers may also have nerve-protecting properties.

All beta-blockers are effective and generally well tolerated. Because they cause less eye irritation than many other glaucoma medications, they are often prescribed for patients who also have cataracts.

Side Effects and Complications. After the beta-blocker is administered, only a tiny amount of the drug is absorbed by the cornea. Most of it enters in the bloodstream. These drugs, therefore, can cause side effects in parts of the body other than the eyes ("systemic" side effects):

Common systemic side effects include reduced sexual drive, fatigue, depression, anxiety, severe nausea and vomiting, and breathing difficulties.
Beta-blockers affect the heart. They lower heart rate and reduce blood pressure. (The newer selective beta-1 blockers may not have as bad effects on the heart as the nonselective beta-blockers.) They may also cause unhealthy cholesterol and triglyceride changes.
All beta-blockers can worsen severe asthma or other lung diseases. Beta-blockers should only be used very cautiously or not at all by anyone with asthma, emphysema, bronchitis, or heart disease. In one study, lung function was reduced in 40% of elderly people who took timolol, even those without previous symptoms of lung problems. (Selective beta-blockers may produce fewer of these adverse effects.)
If the patient is switching to a beta-blocker from other glaucoma medication, there may be a sudden rise in eye pressure. It is important that the pressure be checked shortly after the other drug has been withdrawn.
When beta-blockers are used to treat one eye, the other (contralateral) eye also experiences a lesser, but still significant reduction in IOP.

Interactions with Other Medications. The effects of the eye medication may be additive to other oral medications, such as oral beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, or the antiarrhythmic drug quinidine. People with diabetes who take insulin or hypoglycemic medications should realize that timolol side effects may resemble and mask the symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar).

Prostaglandins are hormone-like substances that help open blood vessels. Drugs that resemble prostaglandins increase outflow of aqueous humor (the watery substance in the eye). Drainage of aqueous humor helps reduce intraocular pressure.

Brands. Latanoprost (Xalatan) and unoprostone (Rescula) are the standard brands. Latanoprost was the first prostaglandin to be approved as first-line treatment for elevated eye pressure. Two newer prostaglandins, travoprost (Travatan) and bimatoprost (Lumigan), may help some patients who do not respond to latanoprost. These drugs may also benefit patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost need to be taken only once daily. Unoprostone needs to be taken twice a day and is not as effective as others, but it still can reduce IOP significantly and is the least expensive of these drugs.

Latanoprost has been shown to reduce pressure by between 45 - 70%. Some, but not all studies, have suggested that newer prostaglandins travoprost (Travatan) and bimatoprost (Lumigan) are more effective than latanoprost, but the older drug appears to be better tolerated. All of these drugs may be work better than timolol in lowering IOP. The newer prostaglandins may be especially superior to timolol in treating African American patients. In comparison studies, latanoprost achieved better IOP pressure reduction than brimonidine. Studies have suggested that bimatoprost is more effective in lowering eye pressure than a combination of timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt). Studies have been mixed on whether latanoprost is superior to the combination.

Side Effects. These drugs do not slow down the heart rate and also appear to be safe for people with asthma. Side effects include itching, redness, and burning during administration. Muscle and joint pain may also occur. All of these drugs may permanently change eye color from blue or green to brown. To date, such color changes do not seem to be hazardous. (The only significant problem may be cosmetic in people who treat only one eye, since the color may differ from the other.) These drugs can increase blood flow in the eye and also make eyelashes become thicker and longer in some patients. (These latter effects are more common with bimatoprost and travoprost than with latanoprost.)

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) decrease eye pressure by reducing the fluid in the chambers of the eye (aqueous humor). Research suggests that CAIs reduce aqueous humor fluid by as much as 40%. These drugs are used for glaucoma when other drugs do not work. They may be combined with other medications.

CAIs may also improve blood flow in the retina and optic nerve (beta-blockers do not). Improving blood flow can keep the disease from getting worse.

Brands and Side Effects. CAIs are available in the following forms:

Eye-drop CAIs include dorzolamide (Trusopt) and brinzolamide (Azopt). About 10% of patients report fatigue, stinging in the eye, and loss of appetite using dorzolamide. Taste changes can occur. Research suggests that dorzolamide can be helpful for children with glaucoma, including those younger than 6 years old. Brinzolamide is a newer medication that was chemically designed to be closer in pH to human tears and may cause less stinging than dorzolamide.
Oral forms include acetazolamide (Diamox), methazolamide (Neptazane), and dichlorphenamide (Daranide). Although they are more effective than eye drops, they have significantly more side effects and are rarely used for long-term treatment. The oral forms have very unpleasant side effects that include frequent urination, depression, stomach problems, fatigue, weight loss, sexual dysfunction, and, in infants, failure to thrive. Long-term use of the oral forms, in rare cases, can cause serious anemia and kidney problems, including the risk for stones. They can also produce a toxic reaction when taken with large doses of aspirin.

Adrenergic agonists activate muscles in the eye that dilate pupils and, therefore, increase outflow of aqueous fluid. Newer variations called alpha 2-adrenergic agonists reduce production of aqueous humor and also increase outflow through the uveoscleral pathway (the alternative channel to the trabecular meshwork). Older adrenergic agonists include epinephrine.

Alpha 2-Adrenergic Agonists. Apraclonidine (Iopidine) and brimonidine (Alphagan) are alpha 2-adrenergic agonists. These have generally been used before glaucoma surgery, but a number of studies are indicating that they may even be useful as primary therapy when used in combination with beta-blockers or other standard drugs.

Brimonidine is proving to be particularly effective for long-term therapy. (Apraclonidine is used for the short term.) It also may have nerve-protecting properties and may be safer than other drugs during pregnancy and for patients with asthma.

The most common side effects of brimonidine and apraclonidine are dry mouth and altered taste. They also commonly trigger an allergic reaction that causes red and itching eyes and lids, a major drawback. Brimonidine causes less of an allergic response than apraclonidine. Unlike apraclonidine, however, it can cause lethargy and mild low blood pressure. It also appears to remain effective longer.

Miotics, also called cholinergic agonists, narrow the iris muscles and constrict the pupil. This action pulls the iris away from the trabecular meshwork and allows the aqueous humor to flow out through the drainage channels, reducing the pressure inside the front of the eye.

Brands. Pilocarpine (Pilocar, Adsorbocarpine, Almocarpine, Isoptocarpine, Ocusert) was the most widely used anti-glaucoma drug before timolol was introduced. It is the preferred miotic. Because pilocarpine is used up by the body fairly quickly, however, patients must take it several times a day; many people, therefore, fail to take their medication regularly. A combination of timolol or latanoprost with pilocarpine is more effective than either drug used alone. Carbachol is another miotic.

Demecarium (Humorsol), isoflurophate (Floropryl), and echothiophate (Phospholine) are a group of long-acting drugs known as anticholinesterase miotics. Because of their potential for serious side effects, however, some authorities even prefer surgery to their use.

Epinephrine and its derivatives are the older anticholinergics. Epinephrine is now rarely prescribed because of side effects. Dipivefrin (Dipivefrin), a newer form of epinephrine, remains inactive until it reacts with enzymes in the cornea. It is effective in low doses and causes few systemic side effects.

Side Effects. Side effects include:

Teary eyes, brow-aches, eye pain, and allergic reactions.
A miotic narrows the pupil and so can cause nearsightedness. Vision can also become dim and it may difficult to see in darkened rooms or at night, when driving could be hazardous. A gel form administered once a day or wafer placed under the lid once a week may help reduce these side effects.
The anticholinesterase miotics increase the risk of cataract development and are therefore used mostly in patients in whom cataracts have already been removed. Retinal detachment is an uncommon but dangerous side effect in susceptible individuals. Excessive use of these miotics may cause toxic reactions, including convulsions, muscular paralysis, and even death from respiratory failure.
Epinephrine can produce burning in the eyes, enlarged pupils, and allergic reactions. Occasionally it can cause anxiety and headaches. Rare side effects include high blood pressure and disturbances in heart rhythm. It is rarely prescribed now. Although dipivefrin, the newer form of epinephrine, has fewer systemic side effects, it still causes problems in the eyes similar to those of epinephrine.

Cannabinoids. Cannabinoids, compounds in marijuana (cannabis), are being studied for their effects on glaucoma. For example, oral or inhaled tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana, has been shown to reduce IOP in 60 - 65% of patients. The effects of smoking marijuana on IOP last only 3 hours, however. THC also increases the release of glutamate -- a nerve-protecting chemical. Experts are hoping that topical use of THC or other cannabinoids may help prevent optic nerve damage without the widespread effects of oral or inhaled administration.

Reasons for Noncompliance. Studies indicate that more than 40% of patients miss 10% of their doses, and 15% of patients miss more than 50% of their doses. Noncompliance is very high for many reasons:

People with chronic glaucoma who are on medication must use eye drops or take pills one or more times a day, usually for the rest of their lives.
Many people require a multi-drug regimen, two or more different kinds of medications that can be used in various combinations, such as eye drops, ointments, or time-release wafers inserted under the eyelid. Such regimens can be very confusing.
The side effects of the drugs are more unpleasant than the disease itself, which has no symptoms until vision is lost. Because the treatment does not usually produce any noticeable improvement, the consequence of not taking the drugs (blindness) may seem far in the future.
Skipping even a few doses can greatly increase the risk of visual loss. It is essential that patients tell their doctor if they are not regularly taking their medication. Otherwise, the doctor may increase the dosage, thereby causing unwelcome side effects.

Patients who do not regularly take their glaucoma medication are at high risk for blindness. If you have problems taking your medications or sticking to the dosing regimen, talk with your doctor.

Hints for Managing a Regimen.

Pharmaceutical manufacturers use colored tops, yellow for timolol, for example, and green for pilocarpine, to help prevent mix-ups. Creating a chart scheduling each drug by color can be helpful.
Small electronic timers are available that will signal times for taking the medications. The timing of these combinations is important. For example, the combination of pilocarpine with latanoprost is most effective when pilocarpine is taken four times a day and when the bedtime dose is administered an hour after latanoprost.
Some patients may be candidates for single medications that combine two drugs, such as Cosopt, which contains both dorzolamide and timolol. This medication requires only one drop twice per day. Patients who need additional glaucoma drugs, however, will need to take these two drugs separately.
When using any drug for a long period of time, side effects are a potential problem. If they become intolerable, patients should discuss with the doctor reducing the dosage or trying other drugs.

Administering Eye Drops. A common reason that medicine does not work is that patients do not take it correctly. Patients should ask the ophthalmologist to watch while they place the drops in their own eyes to make sure the procedure is being done correctly. The following are some recommended steps:

If you use both ointments and eye drops, take the eye drops first.
Wash your hands before applying eye drops.
Hold the bottle upside down.
Tilt your head back and, with one hand, pull the lower eyelid down to form a pocket.
With your other hand, hold the bottle as close as possible to your eye. Don’t let the bottle directly touch your eye or eyelid.
After you have placed the drop, close your eye or press your index finger against the corner of the eye near your nose. Gently move the lower lid upward until the eye is closed. Keep your eye closed for at least 1 minute. This prevents the drop from draining out.
Wait at least 5 minutes before applying another drop or a different medication

In this emergency situation, ophthalmologists may administer a combination of two or more anti-glaucoma medications to reduce eye pressure quickly before it can damage the optic nerve and cause visual loss. Apraclonidine (Iopidine) is a powerful drug used before and after laser surgery to prevent an increase in fluid pressure and is more effective than other medications. In addition to standard drugs, doctors may also administer glycerin (Glyrol, Osmoglyn) by mouth or mannitol or acetazolamide intravenously. Surgery is almost always performed once the pressure is reduced.

Most rare forms of glaucoma respond to the same medications and surgery used for open angle glaucoma. Irido corneal endothelial syndrome (ICE) is difficult to treat and if surgery is required, filtering surgery is the best choice. Neovascular glaucoma is also very hard to treat; researchers are investigating drainage implants for this disorder.

Surgery

If medications do not control eye pressure, or if they create intolerable side effects, surgery may be necessary in a small percentage of people with chronic glaucoma. It may be particularly helpful for patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.

The standard procedures are usually one of the following:

Filtration surgery (trabeculectomy). This procedure opens the full thickness of the drainage area.
Laser trabeculoplasty. This procedure partially opens the drainage area. It does not reduce pressure to the extent of trabeculectomy but it has fewer adverse effects.

African Americans may respond better to initial laser surgery than to conventional trabeculectomy, while the opposite may be true in Caucasians. Some experts now recommend that, in most circumstances, African Americans should start with laser surgery and Caucasians who have no serious medical problems should have trabeculectomy first.

In addition, a number of experimental and less invasive procedures are under development.

The Procedure. Filtration surgery has been used for more than 100 years with only minor modifications. It employs conventional surgical techniques known as full-thickness filtering surgery or guarded filtering surgery (trabeculectomy).

The surgeon creates a sclerostomy, a passage in the sclera (the white part of the eye) for draining excess eye fluid.
A flap is created that allows fluid to escape but which does not deflate the eyeball.
The surgeon may also remove a tiny piece of the iris (called an iridectomy) so that fluid can flow backward into the eye.
A small bubble called a bleb nearly always forms over the opening, which is a sign that fluid is draining out. Although surgeons aim for a thick bleb, which poses less risk than a thin one for later leakage, paradoxically the ideal operation would have no bleb at all.

The procedure has a high success rate. About 50% of patients no longer need medication after surgery. Thirty-five to 40% of those who still need medication have better control of their glaucoma.

A new instrument called a trabectome has allowed for a less invasive type of trabulectomy surgery The trabectome procedure appears to be a safe and simple way to lower eye pressure. It can be performed before a traditional trabulectomy, if needed. Results from a small study, presented at the 2005 meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, showed that the new approach successfully reduced eye pressure in 90% of patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Side Effects. Many of the serious side effects or complications that occur with filtration surgery involve blebs (blister-like bumps).

Bleb Leaks and Infections. Blebs, particularly thin ones, commonly leak. Leakage can occur early on or sometimes as late as months or years after surgery. Untreated, such leaks can be serious and even cause blindness. Late-onset leakage significantly increases the risk for infection as well as a number of other serious conditions, including bleeding, a flattening of the eye ball, and harmful inflammation. Surgical repair is the most effective way of managing leaking blebs, although drug therapies, pressure patching, and other nonsurgical techniques may be tried first. Due to the dangers of leaking blebs, experts recommend lifelong monitoring after surgery. Unfortunately, the incidence of late-onset leaking blebs is increasing due to the use of drugs used in filtration surgery to prevent scarring, another complication.
Scarring. In up to 20% of cases, scars form around the incision, closing up the drainage channels and causing pressure to rebuild. These scars are formed from fibroblasts, which are immature collagen cells that form at the surgical site. Scarring is a particular problem in young patients, African Americans, patients who have taken multiple drugs, have had an inflammatory disease, or have had cataract surgery. Releasing the surgical stitches used in the procedure may help prevent scarring and pressure build-up. A second procedure called bleb needling sometimes can open up the scarred area and restore drainage. With this technique, the tip of a very fine hypodermic needle is used carefully to cut loose the particles closing off the drainage area. A new technique that does not require sutures may prove to be effective and have fewer complications.
Cataracts. The procedure is highly associated with the development of cataracts over time. Because cataracts are associated with glaucoma anyway, it is not entirely clear whether the cataracts are caused by the surgery or would develop in any case.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing cataract surgery.

Supportive Medication for Preventing Scarring. Specific drugs, usually mitomycin C, are often used in conjunction with the procedure to prevent scarring and closure. A large review of studies of mitomycin C supported its effectiveness in increasing surgical success in nearly all patients. Fluorouracil (5-FU) appears to be similar in effectiveness but has a high risk for complications and is not used as often as in the past.

The Procedure. Laser trabeculoplasty involves the following steps:

The procedure uses an instrument, usually a YAG laser, to burn 80 - 100 tiny holes in the drainage area.
A tiny scar forms, which increases fluid outflow.
The procedure takes 15 minutes, causes almost no discomfort, and has very few complications.

In a 2-year study, laser surgery of the trabecular meshwork reduced pressure by a third in 70 - 97% of patients. Patients still need to take anti-glaucoma eye drop medications every day.

Laser surgery is not a cure. Within 2 - 5 years, about half of patients need either additional surgery or new medications.

Complications. In about 35% of patients, pressure increases after surgery. In most cases it is temporary, but in rare cases the increased pressure is permanent and vision loss can occur. Use of the drug apraclonidine (Iopidine) or pilocarpine can help prevent this elevated pressure. About a third of patients also develop adhesive-like substances called peripheral anterior synechiae that cause the iris to stick to part of the cornea.

Drainage implants, also known as tube shunts, may be used to drain fluid in certain cases, such as if glaucoma is not responsive to any standard procedure or is caused by certain conditions. A 2007 study suggested that tube shunts work better than filtration surgery (trabulectomy) for some patients. In the study, patients who received tube shunts had more stable IOP over the course of a year than patients who underwent trabulectomy.

Candidates. Success rates are highest (75% pressure control over 5 - 7 years) in appropriate patients. Drainage implants may be useful in the following conditions:

Glaucoma caused by swelling in the iris
Glaucoma caused by abnormal vessel formations
Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome

The Procedure. In general, the procedure involves:

An implant, most commonly a 1/2 inch silicone tube, is inserted into the eye's front chamber (anterior). The Molteno implant used with mitomycin C is currently the most effective approach, with reported success rates of 80%. Other implants, such as the Ahmed implant, may have fewer complications.
The tube drains the fluid onto a tiny plate that is sewn to the side of the eye.
Fluid collects on the plate and then is absorbed by the tissues in the eye.

Complications. Complications include:

Hypotony (very low eye pressure) is a serious complication that has been reduced using better techniques and improved implants.
Cataracts, detached retina, breakdown of the cornea, and bleeding are potentially significant complications.
There is also a risk for eye movement disorders, such as strabismus (crossed eyes) or diplopia (double-vision).

The implant often becomes blocked and repeated operations are needed. Some researchers are studying the use of a drug called tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) to open up tubes that have been blocked by blood or blood factors. (This so-called clot-busting drug is normally used to break up blood clots during heart attacks.) In one 2002 study, tPA prevented such blocks in 89% of eyes. Unfortunately, significant complications rates were high (11%).

Deep sclerectomy and viscocanalostomy are less invasive techniques than filtering surgery that leave the anterior chamber (front of the eye) intact and avoid creation of blebs.

In deep sclerectomy, the surgeon removes a deep piece of the sclera (the white part of the eye), part of the trabecular meshwork, and the front of Schlemm's canal (the vessels that return fluid into the bloodstream).

In both deep sclerectomy and viscocanalostomy, the surgeon first creates a flap in the outer part of the sclera (the white part of the eye) and then removes a deep piece of the sclera underneath. This opens up Schlemm's canal (the vessels that return fluid into the bloodstream) and exposes a layer above the anterior chamber called Descemet's membrane. A space has also been created between the inner and outer layers of the sclera.
In deep sclerectomy, this space now serves as a tiny reservoir for aqueous fluid that flows through the membrane and pools here. The fluid then flows out without the surgeon having to open the anterior chamber (as in standard filtering surgery).
In viscocanalostomy, the surgeon typically injects gel-like materials into the ends of Schlemm's canal in order to enlarge the canal for fluid outflow and lower IOP. The tiny reservoir is sewn tightly up.

Many variations are under investigation. In general, the procedures have fewer complications afterward than standard filtering surgery, although they require excellent surgical skill. Nonpenetrating techniques do not lower IOPs as much as conventional surgery does, however. In time, however, these nonpenetrating techniques are expected to be as effective as filtration surgery.

Cataracts and Glaucoma. For patients with both glaucoma and cataracts, experts recommend the following:

In patients with cataracts and poorly controlled glaucoma, a two-step procedure for both eye conditions is needed. Typically the patient will first have a trabeculectomy for glaucoma, followed by cataract surgery such as phacoemulsification (lens removal through ultrasound). Fluid leakage and the presence of blood in the back chamber of the eye are potential complications of this combined procedure.
Phacoemulsification is sometimes combined with viscocanalostomy in a procedure called phacoviscocanalostomy. A 2006 study suggested this approach is safe and effective. The study followed patients for 7 years after they underwent phacoviscocanalostomy and found that no serious complications occurred.
In patients who have cataracts plus either closed-angle glaucoma or open angle glaucoma that is stabilized with medication, the cataract may be able to be extracted and medication continued for the glaucoma.

A major 2002 analysis suggested that the combined approach generally offers better control over eye pressure for patients with both cataracts and glaucoma. However, it is still unclear which specific type of surgical procedure works best. [See In-Depth Report #26: Cataracts.]

Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC), also called laser cycloablation, reduces aqueous production by destroying the muscles that control the lens for near and far vision (the ciliary body ). There is a chance of vision loss with this procedure, so it is reserved for people with end-stage glaucoma or those who fail to benefit from any other therapies. Nevertheless, researchers continue to explore the possibilities for this effective procedure, especially for people who may not have access to expensive medications. Studies have suggested it may even be suitable as first-line surgery for some patients.

For an acute closed-angle glaucoma attack, emergency microsurgery is usually necessary after reducing pressure with medications.

Iridotomy or Iridectomy. Either laser (iridotomy) or conventional (iridectomy) surgery may be used. With either procedure an ophthalmologist makes a tiny opening in the iris to let the aqueous humor flow out more freely. Because acute glaucoma commonly occurs later in the other eye, surgeons will often recommend surgery in the unaffected eye to prevent a second attack.

Laser iridotomy almost never requires hospitalization, and postsurgical treatment includes only aspirin and eye drops. It has almost completely replaced conventional surgery, which requires anesthesia and hospitalization.

Vision will be blurred, and recovery can take 4 - 8 weeks. Once surgery has been performed, such patients can usually use previously restricted anticholinergic medications, such as antihistamines and certain antidepressants, with safety.

Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, a procedure ordinarily used for cataracts, may prove to be beneficial for some patients with acute angle-closure glaucoma requiring surgery. [See In-Depth Report #26: Cataracts.]

Lifestyle Changes

Studies suggest that patients with glaucoma who exercise regularly (at least 3 times a week) may be able to reduce their intraocular pressure by an average of 20%. If they stop exercising for more than 2 weeks, pressure increases again. In one study, those who walked briskly 4 times a week for 40 minutes were able to go off their medications. (Although not confirmed by any evidence, yoga or other exercises that involve head-down or inverted positions may be harmful for patients with glaucoma and should be discussed with the doctor.)

Exercise has no effect on closed-angle glaucoma. It may, in fact, increase eye pressure in patients with pigmentary glaucoma. Vigorous high-impact exercise may cause more pigment to be released from the iris in these patients. Patients should talk to their doctor about an appropriate exercise program.

Antioxidants in Foods and Supplements. Diet most likely plays very little role in glaucoma. For example, a 2003 study found no association between important nutrients associated with protection against other eye disorders, including vitamins C, E, A, and carotenoids.

Caffeine. Some studies have shown that large amounts of caffeine drunk in a short period of time can elevate eye pressure for up to 3 hours. One study suggested that such changes in eye pressure could be significant in patients with both normal eye pressure and high IOP.

Fluids. Drinking large amounts (a quart or more) of any liquid within a short time, about 30 minutes, appears to increase pressure. Patients with glaucoma should have plenty of fluids, but they should drink them in small amounts over the course of a day.

Glaucoma can cause the eyes to be very sensitive to light and glare. Medications can worsen this problem. Sunglasses solve this problem and are important for prevention of cataracts. Protective sunglasses do not have to be expensive. Sunglasses are classified into three categories based on protection against ultraviolet radiation (UV) A or B:

Cosmetic-purpose sunglasses block at least 70% UVB and up to 60% UVA. People should avoid these glasses if they have any risk for cataracts or eye problems.
General-purpose sunglasses block at least 95% UVB and a minimum of 60% UVA. At the very least, people should purchase general purpose sunglasses and they should be labeled "Meets ANSI Z80.3 General Purpose UV Requirements.” Labels should indicate that sunglasses block UV radiation up to 400 nm.
Special-purpose sunglasses block at least 99% UVB and a minimum of 60% UVA rays. These are the optimal sunglasses for people at risk for eye disease. Special purpose glasses should wrap around the head and block light coming from above, below, and both sides of the glasses. They should also fit snugly on the nose.
Lenses that are simply dark but not coated with UV-absorbing material may increase the risk of cataracts because the pupil widens to compensate for the shaded glass. This may allow more harmful ultraviolet waves to enter the eye. Polarized glasses cut glare but have no effect on UV radiation. Mirror finishes without additional processing for UV blockage also are not fully protective. There is some controversy over whether blue light is harmful to the eyes. Some people prefer amber lenses, which block out the blue spectrum.

Meditation, biofeedback, and relaxation methods can help counteract stress, and there are some reports that they may help some people with open-angle glaucoma. A number of herbal and nontraditional remedies have been advertised as glaucoma remedies. A few studies have reported that the herbal remedy ginkgo biloba may have properties that offer benefits to patients with glaucoma, including increasing blood flow in the eye without altering overall blood pressure, heart rate, or intraocular pressure. More research is, however, needed.

Generally, manufacturers of herbal remedies and dietary supplements do not need FDA approval to sell their products. Just like a drug, herbs and supplements can affect the body's chemistry, and therefore have the potential to produce side effects that may be harmful. There have been a number of reported cases of serious and even lethal side effects from herbal products. Always check with your doctor before using any herbal remedies or dietary supplements.

The following is of special concern for people with glaucoma:

Bilberry, a European blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), is sold in natural food stores as a glaucoma remedy. Studies indicate that it may help some people improve night vision and glare, but it is not at all effective in preventing or treating glaucoma.

Resources

www.glaucoma.org -- Glaucoma Research Foundation
www.nei.nih.gov -- National Eye Institute
www.glaucomafoundation.org -- The Glaucoma Foundation
www.aao.org -- American Academy of Ophthalmology
www.glaucomaweb.org -- American Glaucoma Society
www.lighthouse.org -- Lighthouse International

References

Bottaro M, Ritch R. Intraocular pressure variation during weight lifting. Vieira GM, Oliveira HB, de Andrade DT. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;124(9):1251-4.

Brauner SC, Chen TC, Hutchinson BT, Chang MA, Pasquale LR, Grosskreutz CL. The course of glaucoma during pregnancy: a retrospective case series. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;124(:1089-94.

Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):9-22.

Hara T, Hara T, Tsuru T. Increase of peak intraocular pressure during sleep in reproduced diurnal changes by posture. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;124(2):165-8.

Higginbotham EJ. Managing glaucoma during pregnancy. JAMA. 2006 Sep 13;296(10):1284-5.

Pasquale LR, Kang JH, Manson JE, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Hankinson SE. Prospective study of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of primary open-angle glaucoma in women. Ophthalmology. 2006 Jul;113(7):1081-6.

Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7.

Wishart MS, Dagres E. Seven-year follow-up of combined cataract extraction and viscocanalostomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2043-9.

Review Date:
3/3/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Editor-in-Chief, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Review: iStik iPod Holder

FitSugar — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0700

Having not upgraded my armband iPod holder when I upgraded my iPod, my workout wear has been limited to pants, shorts and running skirts with pockets to hold my beloved music player. Heading out for a run shouldn't be a fashion dilemma, so I tried the new iStik ($27). Using powerful magnets embedded in a hard plastic face plate, you can put your music wherever you want it. I found the best spot for the iStik to be on the top of my pants, but you can really stick your iPod anywhere with this simple product.

The iStik is made of three pieces: a clear face plate and a backing with magnets, these two pieces encase your generation two or generation three iPod, and a magnetic fastener. All you do is place your encased iPod where you want it, and put the magnetic backing on the other side of your clothes at the same spot. Voila, your iPod is stuck in place by the magnets. Work out hands free, and the magnets don't interfere with the function of the iPod. You can purchase an iStik directly from the iStik website.

Cindy Crawford: Fit and Lovely at 42

FitSugar — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:00:00 -0800

Fashion icon Cindy Crawford was always known as the athletic model, during the glory days of the big six super models. She always looked toned and healthy. At 42, she's still got it. Fitness has always been part of Crawford's life, and now after two kids she's traded the treadmill for hiking. She explains switching from running on a machine to walking on a trail like this:

I found after I had my first kid I could not come home after my workouts and have a nap, so I had to adapt them to make them softer - so they would energize me, rather than wear me out.

She doesn't limit her workout to nature walks; Cindy is a big fan of the vibrating workout offered by the power plate, explaining that you have to mix it up to keep interested in your workout.

To see Cindy's food philosophy, read more.

Having never been one to starve herself, Cindy believes in indulging with moderation. She follows the advice of another fit beauty, Gabby Reece, and Cindy focuses on being 80 percent good 80 percent of the time. I like those stats. But she really listens to her body and avoids eating lots of carbs because they make her feel queasy. Lately she has been opting for tofu over the meat that she serves her family, which sounds familiar to me, except I force tofu on my loved ones.

One very underrated element of aging is self-acceptance, and when questioned if she has spots on her body, Cindy replied:

Every woman does. If there is something you don’t like about yourself, work at it. If you are unable or unwilling to put in the work, accept it - otherwise you will be miserable.

Amen to that, sister. Amen to that.

Source

Back pain and sciatica

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:00 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Risk Factors
Diagnosis
Medications
Complementary and Alternati...
Exercise and Physical Thera...
Surgery
Other Treatments
Specific Treatment for Acut...
Specific Treatment for Chro...
Prognosis
Complications
Prevention
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Surgery

Kyphoplasty, a surgical technique used to treat spinal fractures, does not improve a person's back pain or quality of life, according to a review published in 2006 by a nonprofit health services research agency. Kyphoplasty should only be done if bed rest, medicines, and physical therapy do not relieve back pain.

Ultrasound

Therapeutic ultrasound uses sound waves to deliver gentle vibrations to an area of the body. Scientists in England are studying whether therapeutic ultrasound may help relieve pain and disability due to sciatica.

Acupuncture

Studies continue to show that acupuncture helps some patients with low back pain. Now, research published in the British Medical Journal online says the alternative treatment seems to be worth the price in the long run.

Stem Cells

Researchers in England have pioneered a new technique to grow new spinal tissue using stem cells. Stem cells are the building blocks of specific cells. Every cell in the human body starts (or "stems") from a stem cell. Researchers say a patient's stem cells may someday be used to grow new tissue that can replace damaged discs.

Back pain tied to brain changes

Chronic back pain appears to be linked to tiny structural changes in the brain. German researchers have found that persons with chronic back pain have more activity in the parts of the brain involved in pain processing and emotional responses. It is unclear if the brain changes came before the pain or if they occurred in response to the pain. The scientists presented their findings at the 2006 Radiological Society of North American annual meeting.

Introduction

Back pain is one of the most common reasons people visit their doctor. According to the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 8 out of 10 people have some type of backache.

Back pain can be acute or chronic.

Acute pain develops suddenly and goes away within 6 weeks. Acute pain is the most common type of back pain.
Chronic pain can come on fast or slow, but it lasts longer than 3 months. Back pain can occur in any area of the back, but it is more common in the lower part, which supports most of the body’s weight.

The back is highly complex, and pain may result from damage or injury to any of various bones, nerves, muscles, ligaments, and other structures. Still, despite sophisticated techniques that provide detailed anatomical images of the spine and other tissues, the cause of most cases of back pain remain elusive.

Vertebrae. The spine is a column of small bones, or vertebrae, that support the entire upper body. The column is grouped into three sections.

The cervical (C) vertebrae are the seven spinal bones that support the neck.
The thoracic (T) vertebrae are the twelve spinal bones that connect to the rib cage.
The lumbar (L) vertebrae are the five lowest and largest bones of the spinal column. Most of the body's weight and stress falls on the lumbar vertebrae.

Click the icon to see an image of the spine.

Below the lumbar region is the sacrum, a shield-shaped bony structure that connects with the pelvis at the sacroiliac joints.

At the end of the sacrum are two to four tiny, partially fused vertebrae known as the coccyx or "tail bone."

Click the icon to see an image of the sacrum.

Each vertebra is designated by using a letter and number, which allows the doctor to determine where it is in the spine.

The letter reflects the spinal region where the vertebra is located: C=cervical (neck region), T=thoracic (chest, or middle back, region), and L=lumbar (lower back).
The number signifies the vertebra's place within that spinal region. The numbers start with 1 at the top of a region and count up as the vertebrae descend within the region. For example, C4 is the fourth bone down in the cervical region and T8 is the eighth thoracic vertebrae.

The Disks. Vertebrae in the spinal column are separated from each other by small cushions of cartilage known as intervertebral disks. The disks have no blood supply of their own. They need to rely on nearby blood vessels to keep them nourished.

Click the icon to see an image of an intervertebral disk.

Each disk is 80% water and contains two structures.

Inside each disk is a jelly-like substance called the nucleus pulposus.
The nucleus pulposus is surrounded by a tough, fibrous ring called the annulus.

Click the icon to see an image of the nucleus pulposus.

Processes. Each vertebra in the spine has a number of bony projections called processes. The spinal and transverse processes attach to the muscles in the back and act like little levers, allowing the spine to twist or bend. The particular processes form the joints between the vertebrae themselves, meeting together and interlocking at the zygapophysial joints (more commonly known as facet or z joints ).

Spinal Canal. Each vertebra and its processes surround and protect an arch-shaped central opening. These arches, aligned to run down the spine, form the spinal canal, which encloses the spinal cord.

Click the icon to see an image of the vertebrae and spinal cord.

Spinal Cord. The spinal cord is the central trunk of nerves that connects the brain with the rest of the body. Each nerve root passes from the spinal column to other parts of the body through small openings bounded on one side by the disk and the other by the facets. When the spinal cord reaches the lumbar region, it splits into four bundled strands of nerve roots called the cauda equina (meaning horsetail in Latin).

Click the icon to see an image of the cauda equina.

Causes

In about 85% of back pain cases, the origin of the pain is unknown, and imaging studies usually fail to determine the cause. Disk herniation and disk degeneration due to aging are the most common causes of low back pain. Other problems can also cause this pain, however.

Over the years, the disk can wear away (degenerate), causing inflammation and irritation. This age-related condition is a major source of chronic low back pain.

A herniated disk, sometimes, but incorrectly, called a slipped disk, is widely held to be the most common cause of severe back pain and sciatica. A disk in the lumbar area becomes herniated when it ruptures or thins out and degenerates to the point that the gel within the disk (nucleus pulposus) pushes outward. The damaged disk can take many forms.

A bulge -- The gel has been pushed out slightly from the disk and is evenly distributed around the circumference.
Protrusion -- The gel has pushed out slightly and asymmetrically in different places.
Extrusion -- The gel balloons extensively into the area outside the vertebrae or breaks off from the disk.

There is some debate, however, about how pain develops from a herniated disk and how frequently it causes low back pain. Many people have disks that bulge or protrude and do not suffer back pain. Extrusion (which is less common than the other two conditions) is highly associated with back pain, since the gel is likely to extend out far enough to press against the nerve root, most often the sciatic nerve. Extrusion is very uncommon, however, while sciatic and low-back pain are very common. But there may be other causes of low back pain

Ordinarily, at the time of any injury, the immune system triggers key factors that are designed to promote healing. Evidence is now pointing to an abnormal and persistent immune response in the cells of the nucleus pulposus that may be responsible for nerve injury and pain in the lower back. In such cases, the nucleus pulposus in the herniated disk overproduces certain factors known as cytokines -- notably tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -- that, in high levels, cause inflammation and cell damage. Evidence now suggests that such cytokines cause a biochemical reaction in the regions surrounding the bulging or protruded nucleus pulposus, which results in pain.

Abnormalities in the Annular Ring. Research has also focused on tears in the annular ring -- the fibrous band that surrounds and protects the disk. The annular ring contains a dense nerve network and high levels of peptides that heighten perception of pain. Tears in the annular ring are a frequent finding in patients with degenerative disk disease. Some cases of chronic low back pain may be caused by inward growth of nerve fibers into the annular ring, which triggers pain within the intervertebral disk.

At some time, up to 40% of people have pain called sciatica. This condition occurs when the sciatic nerve is trapped or inflamed.

The Sciatic Nerve. The sciatic nerve has an extensive pathway.

It first branches from the nerve roots that descend off the lowest part of the spinal cord (in the lumbar and sacral areas). Each of the two branches of the sciatic nerve is about as wide as a thumb.
Each branch of the nerve threads through the pelvis and deep into either side of the buttocks.
The nerve branches then pass down each hip and along the back of each thigh to the foot.

Causes of Sciatica. A herniated disk pressing on the sciatic nerve is the most common cause of sciatica, although spinal stenosis or other vertebral abnormalities that press on the sciatic nerve can also cause pain.

The main nerve traveling down the leg is the sciatic nerve. Pain associated with the sciatic nerve usually originates when nerve roots in the spinal cord become compressed or damaged. Symptoms can include tingling, numbness, or pain that radiates to the buttocks, legs, and feet.

Symptoms of Sciatica

Pain due to sciatica can vary widely. It may feel like a mild tingling, dull ache, or a burning sensation. In some cases, the pain is severe enough to cause immobility.

The pain most often occurs on one side. Some people have sharp pain in one part of the leg or hip and numbness in other parts. The affected leg may feel weak.

The pain often starts slowly. Sciatica pain may get worse:

At night
After standing or sitting for long periods of time
When sneezing, coughing, or laughing
After bending backwards or walking more than 50 - 100 yards (particularly if it is caused by spinal stenosis)

Sciatica pain usually goes away within 6 weeks, unless there are serious underlying conditions. Pain that lasts longer than 30 days, or gets worse with sitting, coughing, sneezing, or straining may indicated a longer recovery.

Other than age-related degenerative disk disorders, injuries in the muscles and ligaments supporting the back are the major causes of low back pain. Of note, is the iliac crest pain syndrome (iliolumbar syndrome), in which there are tears in the ligaments that help support the pelvic bone.

Spinal stenosis is the narrowing of the spinal canal. This typically develops as a person ages and the disks become drier and start to shrink. At some point in this process, any disruption, such as a minor injury that results in disk inflammation, can cause impingement on the nerve root and trigger pain. Pain from spinal stenosis can occur in both legs, or it can be felt as sciatica. Spinal stenosis occurs mostly in the elderly with degenerative osteoarthritis, but it can sometimes be caused by other problems, including infection and birth defects.

Spondylosis is a condition in which the fourth or fifth lumbar vertebrae degenerate or develop small fractures. This condition affects 4 - 6% of the general population, and the rates may be higher in certain populations. As it progresses, the spine can become unstable and lead to spondylolisthesis, in which one vertebra slips forward over the other and causes sciatica. The condition most often occurs in older individuals with women having a higher risk than men. It is also a common cause of back pain from stress fractures in young athletes and can also be due to inherited problems, injury, or bone disease.

Some cases of sciatica pain may occur when a muscle located deep in the buttocks pinches the sciatic nerve. This muscle is called the piriformis. The resulting condition is called piriformis syndrome. Piriformis syndrome usually develops after an injury. In rare cases leg swelling, deep-vein blood clots, or both may occur. Piriformis syndrome is sometimes difficult to diagnose.

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammation of the spine that may gradually result in a fusion of vertebrae. Symptoms include a slow development of back discomfort, with pain lasting for more than 3 months. The back is usually stiff in the morning; pain improves with exercise. In severe cases, the patient must continually stoop over. It can be quite mild, however, and it rarely affects a person's ability to work. It occurs mostly in young Caucasians in their mid-20s. The disease is more common in men, but about 30% of the cases are in women. Researchers believe that in most cases it is hereditary. About 20% of people with inflammatory bowel disease and about 20% of people with psoriasis develop a form of ankylosing spondylitis. There are few effective treatments for this potentially disabling disease, although etanercept (Enbrel) and infliximab (Remicade), anti-inflammatory agents known as TNF-blockers, are proving to be beneficial.

Any abnormality in joints, vertebrae, or nerve roots can cause back pain:

The facet (z-joints) joints can wear down. In such cases, pain occurs on arching the back or when walking.
In some cases a segment (consisting of two vertebrae and their common joint and disk) becomes unstable when its parts wear down.
Injury to nerve roots, notably deep root ganglia (nerve cells in the spine whose fibers extend from skin to muscle tissue), may be important in some cases. Some patients may have scar tissue that traps the nerve roots in the lower spine and causes sciatica.

Risk Factors

In most known cases, pain begins with an injury, after lifting a heavy object, or after making a sudden movement. Not all people have back pain after such events, however. In the majority of back pain cases, the causes are unknown.

Some evidence suggests that after episodes of back pain, some people may experience changes in brain structure and chemicals that produce an exaggerated response in nerve cells. In fact, a 2005 study suggested that chronic back pain actually shrinks the brain by as much as 11%. Such brain changes may cause a persistent perception of pain even though the actual injury has healed.

German researchers have found that chronic back pain appears to be linked to tiny structural changes in the brain. Using a specialized imaging method, they learned that persons with chronic back pain seemed to have a different, more complex structure to their brain and more activity in the areas involved in pain processing and emotional responses. It is unclear if the brain changes occurred before the pain or in response to the pain.

A number of conditions may make people more or less susceptible to low back pain.

Intervertebral disks begin deteriorating and growing thinner by age 30. One-third of adults over 20 show signs of herniated disks (although only 3% of these disks cause symptoms). As people continue to age and the disks lose moisture and shrink, the risk for spinal stenosis increases. The incidence of low back pain and sciatica increases in women at the time of menopause as they lose bone density. In older adults, osteoporosis and osteoarthritis are also common. However, the risk for low back pain does not mount steadily with ever-increasing age, which suggests that at a certain point, the conditions causing low back pain plateau.

Inherited Spinal Structure Abnormalities. Many people have a genetic susceptibility to low back pain, usually from inheriting spinal structural abnormalities.

Inherited Weakened Disks. Studies are finding that specific mutations of the COL9A gene may play a role in about 10% of sciatica cases. The gene is normally involved in producing collagen, the protein building block in all structural tissue in the body. When defective, it may cause the disk to be less able to resist compressive forces. One 2001 study found the defective gene was present in twice as many patients with disk problems as in patients without back pain.

The likelihood of experiencing back pain increases as children age. Some studies suggest that pain is more common among girls than boys. A common cause of temporary back pain is carrying backpacks that are too heavy for children. Backpacks should not weigh more than 20% of the child's body weight. They should weigh even less for very young children. Emotional or behavioral problems may also contribute to back pain in children.

Jobs that involve lifting, bending, and twisting into awkward positions, as well as those that cause whole-body vibration (usually due to long-distance truck driving), place workers at particular risk for low back pain. The longer a person continues such a job, the higher the risk. Some workers wear back support belts, but evidence strongly suggests that they are useful only for people who are currently have low back pain. The belts offer little added support for the back and do not prevent back injuries. In one study, workers who wore the belt for prevention reported more back pain than the workers who did not wear them.

A number of companies are developing programs to protect against back injuries. Although studies are mixed on the outcome of company interventions, one analysis suggested that they do have a positive effect. Employers and workers should make every effort to create a safe working environment. Office workers should have chairs, desks, and equipment that support the back or help maintain good posture.

Infections. A number of common and uncommon infections are a cause of back pain. Chronic uterine or pelvic infections can cause low back pain in women. Osteomyelitis is infection in the spine, a rare cause of back pain. Other infections that cause back pain include Lyme disease, septic arthritis, bacterial endocarditis, Reiter syndrome, mycobacterial, fungal arthritis, and viral arthritis. Chlamydia pneumonia, an atypical organism that is a common cause of mild pneumonia in young adults, is now believed to cause widespread inflammation in the body's tissue, including blood vessels, and may be responsible for a number of chronic conditions, including heart disease. Some evidence further suggests it may cause inflammation in arteries of the lower spine and contribute to spinal stenosis.

Many medical conditions are associated with back pain.

Osteoporosis is a disease of the skeleton in which the amount of calcium present in the bones slowly decreases to the point where the bones become fragile and prone to fracture. It usually does not cause pain unless the vertebrae collapse suddenly, in which case the pain is often severe. Studies indicate, however, that the incidence of low back pain and sciatica increase around the time of menopause, and very tiny fractures in the vertebrae caused by osteoporosis may be an undetected cause of back pain in many elderly women.
Osteoarthritis occurs in joints where cartilage is damaged and then destroyed, usually as a result of aging. In reaction to this destruction, the bones associated with the joints develop abnormalities. When osteoarthritis affects the spine, it may damage the cartilage in the disks, the moving joints of the spine, or both. The nerves may become pinched, causing pain and in advanced cases, numbness and muscle weakness. The patient may also experience muscle spasms and diminished mobility.
Inflammatory disorders, such as Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, can produce inflammation in the spine (sacroiliitis), although the spine is less commonly affected than other locations.
Other conditions that can directly cause pain include fibromyalgia, Paget's disease, Parkinson's disease, abscesses, blood clots, and cancer.
Other medical conditions cause referred back pain, which occurs in conjunction with problems in organs unrelated to the spine (although usually located near it). Such conditions include ulcers, kidney disease (including kidney stones), ovarian cysts, and pancreatitis.

Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by progressive loss of bone density, thinning of bone tissue and increased vulnerability to fractures. Osteoporosis may result from disease, dietary or hormonal deficiency or advanced age. Regular exercise and vitamin and mineral supplements can reduce and even reverse loss of bone density.

It should be noted, however, that a number of medical conditions, such as lung and heart problems and chronic headaches, commonly occur with low back pain. A causal relationship among them, however, is uncertain.

Persistent low back pain in children is more likely to have a serious cause that requires treatment than back pain in adults. According to one small study, one third of children being treated at a hospital for back pain were found to have serious underlying problems.

Stress fractures (spondylolysis) in the spine are a common cause of back pain in young athletes. Sometimes a fracture may not show up for a week or two after an injury. Spondylolysis can cause spondylolisthesis, a condition in which the spine becomes unstable and the vertebrae slip over each other.

Hyperlordosis is an inborn exaggerated inward curve in the lumbar area. Scoliosis, an abnormal curvature of the spine in children, does not usually cause back pain.

Juvenile chronic arthropathy is an inherited form of arthritis. It can cause pain in the sacrum and hip joints of children and young people. It used to be grouped under juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, but is now defined as a separate problem.

Injuries, benign tumors such as osteoblastoma or neurofibroma and cancers, including leukemia, can also cause back pain in children.

Medications may trigger back pain. For example, anticoagulants can cause bleeding or an internal bruise. Long-term steroid use can cause infection or compression fractures.

Some research is suggesting that some people have motor control abnormalities in the deep muscles near the spine. Such lack of control causes instability in the spine that can lead to pain.

Pregnant women are prone to back pain due to a shifting of abdominal organs, the forward redistribution of body weight, and the loosening of ligaments in the pelvic area as the body prepares for delivery. Tall women are at higher risk than short women. Although some earlier research had suggested that the use of epidurals for pain relief during labor could lead to chronic back pain, studies in 2002 reported no increased risk.

Psychological factors are known to play a strong influential role in three phases of low back pain:

Some evidence suggests preexisting depression and the inability to cope may be more likely to predict the onset of pain than physical problems. For example, a British study reported that people who showed emotional distress at age 23 were nearly twice as likely to suffer from back pain 10 years later. A 2005 study found that a “passive” coping style (not wanting to confront problems) was strongly associated with the risk of developing disabling neck or low back pain.
The perception of pain. Social and psychological factors play a role in the severity of a person's perception of back pain. For example, one study compared truck drivers and bus drivers. Nearly all the truck drivers liked their work. Half of them reported low back pain but only 24% lost time at work. Bus drivers, on the other hand, reported much lower job satisfaction than truck drivers, and these workers with back pain had a significantly higher absentee rate than truck drivers in spite of less stress on their backs. Similarly, another study found that pilots, who generally reported "loving their jobs," reported far fewer back problems than their flight crews. And yet another study reported that low rank, low social support, and high stress in soldiers was associated with a higher risk for disabling back pain.
Chronic pain. Depression and a tendency to develop physical complaints in response to stress also increase the likelihood that acute back pain will become a chronic condition. The way a patient perceives and copes with pain at the beginning of an acute attack may actually condition the patient to either recover or develop a chronic condition. Those who over-respond to pain and fear for their long-term outlook tend to feel out of control and become discouraged, increasing their risk for long-term problems.

Studies also suggest that patients who reported prolonged emotional distress have less favorable outcomes after back surgeries. It should be strongly noted that the presence of psychological factors in no way diminishes the reality of the pain and its disabling effects. Recognizing it as a strong player in many cases of low back pain, however, can help determine the full range of treatment options.

Diagnosis

Because nearly all cases of low back pain clear up in a short time and are not due to serious problems, a medical history and a brief physical examination are almost always sufficient.

Still, with very severe or chronic back pain, it is important that any serious medical causes as well as cauda equina syndrome and progressive nerve damage be ruled out first. If the doctor suspects a serious underlying cause, the approach to determining the origin of back pain involves answering three questions:

Is some general medical disorder present that could be causing the pain?
Are there social or emotional factors that might be intensifying the pain?
Are the nerves in the spine involved in the pain (such as in sciatica)?

Such questions can usually be answered with a medical history and physical examination.

A patient should report any serious health problems and concerns during a medical and family history, especially those listed below.

Previous episodes of back pain
Any injuries or accidents involving the neck, back, or hips
History of cancer
Unexplained weight loss or chronic infection
The frequency, duration, and nature of the back pain
When the back pain occurs
What triggered the pain (such as lifting a heavy object)
Conditions that make the pain worse such as coughing
Any situation that relieves the pain
Urination of bowel movement problems
Other relevant symptoms such as morning stiffness, weakness, or numbness in the legs.

The main goal of a physician exam is to try and determine the source of the pain and to determine limits of movement.

Patients are asked to sit, stand, and walk in different ways (flat-footed, on the toes, and on their heels).
In some cases they are asked to walk on a treadmill to test for weakness in toe or heel walking (which may indicate stenosis).
Patients will be requested to bend forward, backward, and sideways and to twist.
Patients will be asked to lift their leg straight up while lying down. The doctor will also move the patient's legs in different positions and bend and straighten the knees. (Pain caused by sciatica can be intensified by lifting the affected leg straight in the air. It is usually sharp, localized, and accompanied by numbness or tingling. Pain caused by inflammation is duller and more generalized and not affected by lifting a straight leg.)
The doctor may measure the circumference of the calves and thighs to look for muscle deterioration.
To test nerve function and reflexes, doctors will tap the knees and ankles with a rubber hammer. The doctor may also touch parts of the body lightly with a pin, cotton swab, or feather to test for numbness and nerve sensitivity.

Because most patients with back pain are on the mend or completely recovered within 6 weeks, imaging techniques such as x-rays or scans are rarely recommended in the first month unless a tumor, fracture, infection, cauda equina syndrome, or progressive neurologic disease is suspected.

Patients who have the following symptoms or experienced certain events may need imaging studies.

Pain that lasts more than a month
Very severe or progressive pain, numbness
Muscle weakness
A previous accident or injury that might have affected the back
A history of cancer
Indications of an underlying disease such as fever or unexplained weight loss
Pain that occurs in patients over 65 years of age

If these conditions exist, usually an x-ray is used first. If results are inconclusive, either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be performed. (Ultrasound is not useful.)

X-Rays. Although many patients with acute and uncomplicated low back pain believe that plain x-rays of the spinal column are important in a diagnosis, they are not very helpful in most patients except for reducing anxiety. If pain persists after 6 - 8 weeks, then x-rays are usually warranted. In such cases, x-rays may reveal signs of injury, infection, tumors, stenosis, or changes in the vertebrae that may be causing inflammation or compression on the nerve. There are many different types of x-rays for the spine.

A diskography is an x-ray of the disk. This procedure requires injections into disks suspected of being the source of pain and disks nearby. It can be painful and is generally only used for patients who are undergoing back surgery to identify the location of the injured disk.
An x-ray myelogram is an x-ray of the spine that requires a spinal injection of a special dye and the need to lie still for several hours to avoid a very painful headache. It has value only for select patients with pain on moving and standing. It has largely been replaced by CT and MRI scans.

CT stands for computerized tomography. In this procedure, a thin x-ray beam is rotated around the area of the body to be visualized. Using very complicated mathematical processes called algorithms the computer is able to generate a 3-D image of a section through the body. CT scans are very detailed and provide excellent information for the doctor.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide very well-defined images of soft tissue and bone. It is not painful, but some people may feel claustrophobic in scanners that are fully enclosed. MRIs can detect annular tears, or disk fragments, and non-spinal causes of back pain, including infection and cancer. However, MRIs are no more effective than x-rays in identifying arthritis, and they are more expensive. Some medical evidence suggests that relying on MRI images of disk abnormalities to determine treatment has resulted in many unnecessary surgeries. At least 40% of all adults have bulging or protruding vertebral disks, and most have no back pain. The degree of disk abnormalities revealed by MRIs often have very little to do with the severity of the pain or the need for surgery. Disk abnormalities in people who have back pain may simply be a coincidence rather than an indication for treatment.

Click the icon to see an image of a MRI machine.

Advanced imaging techniques should be used only when underlying infection, cancer, or nerve involvement is suspected.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography. This imaging exam looks at the nerves in the pelvic area. Researchers reporting in the Journal of Neurosurgery found that it helped reveal pinched nerves that can cause leg pain. The findings could lead to new ways to diagnose sciatica and piriformis syndrome.

Bone Scintigraphy and SPECT Imaging.In rare cases, doctors may use bone scintigraphy (bone scanning) to determine abnormalities in the bones. The technique may be useful for early detection of spinal fractures, cancer that has spread to the bone, or osteoarthritis. During this exam, a small amount of radioactive material is injected into a vein. It circulates through the body, and is absorbed by the bones. The bones can then be visualized using x-rays or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). A study in the February 2006 journal Radiology found that SPECT can help determine which patients would get low back pain relief from spinal injections. Forty-seven patients were randomly divided into two groups: One group received SPECT before they were scheduled for an injection, the other group did not. Those who showed spinal problems on the SPECT images received an injection in the area of the abnormalities. Those who had a normal SPECT, as well as those who did not have the test at all, received injections in the area recommended by their referring physician. After a month, those who had targeted injections using the SPECT images had greater pain relieve than those who did not.

Electrodiagnostic tests that analyze the electric waveforms of nerves and muscles may be useful for detecting nerve abnormalities that may be causing back pain and identifying possible injuries. They are also useful to determine if any abnormal structural findings on an MRI or other imaging test have real significance as a cause of the back pain. It should be noted that any nerve injuries that affect these tests may not be present for 2 - 4 weeks after symptoms begin.

Nerve conduction studies and electromyography are the electrodiagnostic tests most commonly performed.

Nerve Conduction Studies. To perform nerve conduction studies, surface electrodes are attached to the skin. Small electric shocks are then applied to measure the speed of nerve conduction.

Electromyography. To perform electromyography, a fine, sterile, wire electrode is inserted briefly into a muscle and the electrical activity is displayed on a viewing screen. Electromyography can be quite painful, and some experts question, in fact, whether it adds any valuable diagnostic information. They suggest it be limited to unusual cases or when other tests indicate that the condition is aggressive and may increase the risk for rapid, significant injury.

Blood and urine samples may be used to test for infections, arthritis, or other conditions.

Injecting a drug that blocks pain into the nerves in the back helps locate the level in the spine where problems occur.

A procedure called a facet block is also useful in locating areas of specific damage.

Provocative diskometry is a test that uses an injection of saline solution into the suspected disk to reproduce the pain, which is then followed by injection of an anesthetic to dull the pain.

Medications

The most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of back pain are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). These drugs block prostaglandins, the substances that dilate blood vessels and cause inflammation and pain. Evidence suggests that short-term use of NSAIDs brings effective relief in patients with acute back pain. The benefits for chronic back pain are less certain.

There are dozens of NSAIDs. The most common are the following:

Over-the-counter NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Nuprin, Motrin IB, Rufen), naproxen (Aleve), ketoprofen (Actron, Orudis KT).
Prescription NSAIDs include ibuprofen (Motrin), naproxen (Naprosyn, Anaprox), flurbiprofen (Ansaid), diclofenac (Voltaren), tolmetin (Tolectin), ketoprofen (Orudis, Oruvail), nabumetone (Relafen), dexibuprofen (Seractil), and indomethacin (Indocin).
Topical NSAIDs delivered in gels, creams, or patches do not appear to provide any long-term benefits in reducing arthritic pain.

Many experts now recommend that patients who take NSAIDs by mouth only do so for a short period of time. A 2004 review published in the British Medical Journal suggested that long-term use of NSAIDs does not actually reduce osteoarthritis pain and may increase patients’ risk of experiencing side effects. High dosages of NSAIDs can cause heart problems such as increased blood pressure, kidney problems, and stomach bleeding.

In April 2005, the FDA asked drug manufacturers of prescription NSAIDs to place an alert on their medicines warning people that the drugs have been linked to an increased risk for cardiovascular events and gastrointestinal bleeding. The FDA also requested manufacturers of OTC NSAIDs to revise their labels to include more specific language concerning potential cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks. Aspirin does not contain such warning labels.

Long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the second most common cause of ulcers and the rate of NSAID-caused ulcers is increasing. Ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also more likely to bleed than those caused by the bacterium H. pylori.

Doctors cannot predict which patients taking these drugs will develop bleeding.

Among the groups at high risk for bleeding are elderly people, anyone with a history of ulcers of GI bleeding, patients with serious heart conditions, alcohol abusers, and those on certain medications, such anticoagulants ("blood thinners"), corticosteroids, or bisphosphonates (drugs used for osteoporosis).

Proton-pump inhibitors may help to prevent and heal ulcers caused by NSAIDs. Proton-pump inhibitors include omeprazole (Prilosec), esomeprazole (Nexium), and lansoprazole (Prevacid).

An ulcer is a crater-like lesion on the skin or mucous membrane that is caused by an inflammatory, infectious, or cancerous condition. To avoid irritating an ulcer, stop smoking and try to eliminate certain substances from your diet, including caffeine and alcohol. Prescription medicines are available to suppress the acid in the stomach that causes erosion of the stomach lining. Endoscopic therapy can be used to stop ulcer-related bleeding.

Coxibs block an inflammation-promoting enzyme called COX-2. This drug class was initially thought to work as well as NSAIDs, while causing less gastrointestinal distress. However, following numerous reports of cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal problems, and skin rashes, the FDA is currently re-evaluating the relative risks and benefits of this drug class. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) have been withdrawn from the United States market. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is still available, but patients should ask their doctor if this drug is appropriate and safe for them.

Tramadol (Ultram) is a pain reliever that has been used as an alternative to opioids. It has opioid-like properties, but is not as addictive. (Dependence and abuse have been reported, however.) It can cause nausea, but does not cause the severe gastrointestinal problems that NSAIDs can. Some patients who take tramadol experience severe itching. A combination of tramadol and acetaminophen (Ultracet) is now available. It provides more rapid pain relief than tramadol alone.

Narcotics are pain-relieving and sleep-inducing drugs that act on the central nervous system. They are the most powerful medications available for the management of pain.

There are two types of narcotics:

Opiates are derived from natural opium such as morphine and codeine.
Opioids are synthetic drugs and include oxycodone (Percodan, Percocet, Oxycontin), hydrocodone (Vicodin), and oxymorphone (Numorphan).

Novel ways to deliver pain medicine have been developed. A skin patch containing an opioid called transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic) may relieve chronic back pain more effectively than oral opioids. For very severe pain, a small, patient-controlled pump called SynchroMed may be used. This device is implanted under the skin in the abdomen and delivers pulses of pain-relieving opioids to the spinal canal.

Common side effects of opioids include anxiety, constipation, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, paranoia, urinary retention, restlessness, and labored or slow breathing. Addiction is a risk, although less than is commonly believed when these medications are used for pain relief. In fact, when prescribed properly, use of opioids for chronic pain can be safer in some cases than on-going use of NSAIDs. Unfortunately, opioid abuse among young people is a major concern. Unless the pain is very severe, experts advise against routinely prescribing opioids.

Injections of different substances are sometimes used to treat low back pain caused by nerve impingement. The injection is usually an epidural, which is directed into the spaces between the outer membrane of the spine and the vertebrae. None of these substances cure the problem.

Corticosteroids. An injection of a corticosteroid (commonly called a steroid) is directed as close to the injured location as possible. Corticosteroids reduce inflammation. This approach may temporarily relieve sciatic pain until the body heals itself. Studies that measure the benefits of steroids on sciatica or low back pain are conflicting. There is some evidence that patients can experience rebound pain within a few months. Some experts have also raised concerns that even a single injection can cause serious and painful side effects, including meningitis and inflammation, although such risks are very low.
Hypertonic saline (salt water solution). Epidural injections of saline are being investigated for breaking up scar tissue. One 2001 study compared targeted injections of saline and steroids directed at the nerve root. Although steroid injections had more immediate benefits, both products offered improvement. By the third month, patients who had saline injections experienced less pain than the steroid group. A 2003 study found that epidural corticosteroid injections provided no greater benefit than saline injections for patients with sciatica.
Local anesthetics. Injections of anesthetics such as Xylocaine or bupivacaine may help some patients, although studies on their benefits are mixed.
Botulinum. Researchers are investigating whether injections of botulinum toxin (Botox) in the lower back can safely and effectively relieve pain. Very small amounts of Botox temporarily paralyzes muscle tissue. Botox is commonly used to smooth out wrinkles. Some studies have suggested that Botox may be very helpful in relieving chronic low back pain and sciatica caused by piriformis syndrome. In a 2001 study, the benefits of Botox injections for low back pain subsided within 6 months.

A 2002 review of studies concluded that antidepressants may lessen pain severity in some patients, although they had little effect on daily functioning. Antidepressants called tricyclics can be effective painkillers in non-depressed people with chronic back pain. Such antidepressants include amitriptyline (Elavil, Endep), desipramine (Norpramin), doxepin (Sinequan), imipramine (Tofranil), amoxapine (Asendin), nortriptyline (Pamelor, Aventyl), and maprotiline (Ludiomil). It should be noted that tricyclics can have severe side effects. Nonetheless, experts believe there is a useful role for these drugs that warrants further investigation.

A combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants such as cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril), diazepam (Valium), carisoprodol (Soma), or methocarbamol (Robaxin) are sometimes used for patients with acute low back pain. Medical evidence has found that they can help relieve non-specific low back pain, but some experts have warned that these drugs should be used cautiously, since they target the brain, not the muscles. Patients who take muscle relaxants may experience a number of central nervous system side effects such as drowsiness. The muscle relaxant Soma can be addictive and does little more than produce sleep.

Tumor-Necrosis Factor (TNF) Modifiers. TNF modifiers block the action of tumor necrosis factor, a protein involved in inflammatory response. Because of their anti-inflammatory properties, TNF modifier drugs are being investigated for the treatment of the nerve dysfunction and pain that occurs in sciatica. Some small studies indicate that infliximab (Remicade) may help reduce sciatica pain. Early studies suggest that another TNF modifier, etanercept (Enbrel), may be useful for treating sciatica and back pain. TNF modifiers are powerful drugs that can cause severe side effects.

Lidocaine Patch. A skin patch containing lidocaine, a local anesthetic, has been used specifically for herpes zoster pain. Early studies suggest that this patch, called Lidoderm, may provide significant relief for people who suffer from low back pain with very few adverse effects, even with continuous use of four patches a day. If further studies support its benefits, the patch could prove to be an important treatment

NO-NSAIDs. NO-NSAIDs are drugs that combine NSAIDs and nitric oxide (NO), a substance that enhances blood flow to the stomach and increases levels of protective mucus and bicarbonate. These agents show particular promise in providing pain relief and reducing the risk for GI problems.

Most herbal remedies used for back pain have both pain-relief and anti-inflammatory effects. Popular herbs for back pain relief include:

White willow bark (Salix alba) contains salicylates, the same chemicals found in aspirin.
Bromelain is an enzyme found in pineapple.
Boswellia (Boswellia serrata) is an herb commonly used in Indian Ayurvedic medicine.
Devil’s claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) is an African herb sometimes used to relieve arthritic pain.

White willow bark, bromelain, and Boswellia have blood-thinning properties and can interfere with anticoagulant medications such as warfarin (Coumadin).

Complementary and Alternative Medicine

A number of complementary and alternative treatments are used to relieve back pain. Complementary means it is used together with conventional medicine. Alternative means it is done in place of conventional medicine.

Acupuncture is now a common alternative treatment for certain kinds of pain. It involves inserting small needles or exerting pressure on certain "energy" points in the body. When the pins have been placed successfully, the patient is supposed to experience a sensation that brings a feeling of fullness, numbness, tingling, and warmth with some soreness around the acupuncture point. Unfortunately, rigorous studies of acupuncture are difficult to perform, and most evidence on its benefits is weak. In any case, it may be specifically helpful for certain patients with back pain, such as pregnant women, who must avoid medications. Anyone who undergoes acupuncture should be sure it is performed in a reputable location by experienced practitioners who use sterilized equipment.

Click the icon to see an image of acupuncture.

A number of well-conducted studies have supported the benefits of massage therapy for patients with chronic or acute back pain, especially when it is combined with exercise and patient education. In fact, one analysis in 2003 suggested it may reduce the costs of care. However, it is usually not covered by insurance.

According to a 2001 review of studies, only intensive programs that include both psychological and physical rehabilitation therapies were successful in reducing chronic low back pain and improving function. A number of effective approaches to low back pain -- collectively called mind-body techniques -- employ psychological, behavioral, or physical methods to promote relaxation and reduce stress. Although many may be helpful, evidence is lacking on the specific approaches that would be most successful and which patients would most likely benefit.

Stress Reduction. Stress reducing techniques, including relaxation methods and meditation, may be helpful. One study, for example, reported that meditation was beneficial in reducing pain and improving mood among chronic pain sufferers who had not responded to traditional care. Another found that after 3 weeks, patients who were in pain after back surgery had less discomfort and slept better after practicing relaxation imagery techniques while listening to music for 25 minutes a day.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. Studies report that a course of cognitive-behavioral therapy helps reduce chronic back pain or at least enhances the patient's ability to deal with it. The primary goal of this form of therapy in such cases is to change the distorted perceptions that patients have of themselves and their approach to pain. Using specific tasks and self-observation, patients gradually shift their fixed ideas that they are helpless against the pain that dominates their lives to the perception that pain is only one negative and, to a degree, a manageable experience among many positive ones. In one study, therapists also taught relaxation techniques and methods to improve posture. The sessions lasted for 2.5 hours each week for 12 weeks. More research is needed.

Patient Education and Support Groups. A 2002 study reported that patients with chronic low back pain who participated in an expert-moderated e-mail support and discussion group had less pain and disability after 12 months. An Australian massive public-health campaign that educated patients and doctors about the importance of staying active and dispelled fears about long-term impairment from back pain dramatically reduced disability and worker compensation claims.

Spinal Manipulation for Uncomplicated Acute Low Back Pain. Spinal manipulation may be useful for acute back pain that persists beyond 2 - 3 weeks. There are a number of variations, but one example of a spinal manipulation technique is the following:

The patient first lies on their side.
The practitioner grasps the exposed shoulder and either the hip or knee and then presses the upper and lower portions of the body in opposite directions, so that the torso rotates.
The shifting vertebrae make a cracking or popping sound, indicating that they have exceeded the normal range of motion.
Often this results in a greater sense of ease and mobility. (The effect, however, may be temporary.)

Whether on-going manipulations relieve pain better that just one visit is a subject of debate. Some patients consider spinal manipulation to be highly effective for chronic low back pain. A major 2003 analysis, however, reported that current evidence did not support the benefits of spinal manipulation over general medical care or physical therapy for either acute or chronic back pain. [It was better than sham (fake) therapy, however.]

Spinal manipulations are typically performed by chiropractors, but osteopathic doctors also perform them.

One in three people with low back pain seek treatment from a chiropractor. Chiropractic was founded in the U.S. in the late 1800s. The specific goal of chiropractors is to perform spinal manipulations to improve nerve transmission. Many studies have now confirmed that patients feel more satisfied with their chiropractic care than with treatment from general practitioners.
Osteopathy was also founded in the 1800s. Its core approach to healing also involves physical manipulation. Osteopathy manipulates the bones, muscles, and tendons to optimize blood circulation. The general direction of osteopathy over the years has widened to employ a broader range of treatments that now approach those of standard medicine. One 1999 study reported that osteopathy was as effective as medical treatment in relieving low back pain and patients required far less medication and physical therapy. Osteopathic treatment was also far less expensive than traditional back pain treatments.

Both chiropractors and osteopaths offer verbal assurance and a precise treatment regimen. The direct physical connection through spinal manipulation reinforces the patient-practitioner relationship. The emotional effects of such connections may be as important for healing as the treatments themselves.

Mild and temporary side effects from spinal manipulation are common. The potential for serious adverse effects from low back manipulations is low. It should be strongly noted, however, that serious complications (including stroke or spinal cord or neck injury) have been reported with manipulations of the neck. Although little research has been done on such complications, an English survey indicated that they are more frequent than commonly thought.

Some chiropractors may take a lot of x-rays, particularly those of the full spine, which may have long-term harmful consequences. Patients should also be aware that some chiropractors use alternative treatments that have not been proven or rigorously studied. All patients should require objective evidence on the benefits of their treatments.

Vertebral Axial Decompression. Vertebral axial decompression (VAX-D) may reduce pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain, including sciatic pain that radiates down the leg. The patient lies face down on a special table, clutching hand grips and wearing a pelvic harness. The traction-like action alternately decompresses and relaxes the spine over 1-minute intervals. Each session lasts about 30 minutes. Ten to 20 sessions on successive days are often required. The procedure is thought to alleviate pain and enhance healing by relieving pressure within the disks, promoting the in-flow of oxygen, fluids, and nutrients to the spinal column. Some evidence supports its benefits, with reported success rates of around 70%. Because it is considered experimental, it is not yet covered by most insurers. More studies are needed to confirm its possible benefits.

Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy. A technique called percutaneous neuromodulation therapy (PNT) uses a small device delivers electrical stimulation to deep tissues and nerve pathways near the spine. It has shown some initial promise for relief of chronic back pain and may also improve mobility and sleep. Treatment sessions are conducted in the doctor's office and last about 30 minutes. A correct pattern of stimulation appears to be important for optimal relief and needs to be determined.

Electric Nerve Stimulation. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) uses low-level electrical pulses to suppress back pain. A variant, percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS), applies these pulses through a small needle to acupuncture points. The standard procedure is to give 80 - 100 pulses per second for 45 minutes three times a day. The patients are barely aware of the sensation. Although a 2002 analysis of trials could find no direct evidence of benefit, small studies have reported some relief for chronic low back pain from either TENS or PENS. It is not known if these effects are long lasting. Neither approach is helpful for relief of acute low back pain in most patients.

Muscle Stimulation. Two investigative procedures called automated or electrical twitch obtaining intramuscular stimulation (ATOIMS or ETOIMS) are showing promise. ATOIMS uses an automated mechanical device that vibrates the muscle using a tiny pin. (The sensation is described as similar to a mosquito bite.) ETOIMS uses an extremely mild electrical current. They can also be used together. Both approaches cause the muscles to twitch and then relax then the process is stopped. Discomfort is minimal. Small studies are reporting some help in relieving a number of condition the cause chronic pain, including low back pain.

Therapeutic ultrasound. Therapeutic ultrasound involves placing a small wand or probe directly onto the skin. The wand gives off sound waves, which gently vibration the area. Scientists in England are studying whether therapeutic ultrasound may help relieve pain and disability due to sciatica.

Intradiscal Electrothermal Treatment (IDET). Intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) uses electricity to heat a painful disk. Heat is applied for about 15 minutes. Pain may temporarily feel worse, but after healing, the disk shrinks and becomes desensitized to pain. However, healing takes several weeks. The surgery may not work in obese patients.

Some studies have reported positive benefits to IDET; others say it does not significantly reduce pain. A randomized, blinded study published in the November 2005 journal Spine found that IDET was no better than a sham (fake) procedure in relieving chronic back pain due to disk disease. For the study, patients were randomly selected to receive either IDET or a sham procedure. After 6 months, there was no difference in pain symptoms between the two groups.

Exercise and Physical Therapy

Incorrect movements or long-term high-impact exercise is often a cause of back pain in the first place. People vulnerable to back pain should avoid activities that put undue stress on the lower back or require sudden twisting movements, such as football, golf, ballet, and weight lifting.

Exercise does not help acute back pain. In fact, overexertion may cause further harm.

An incremental aerobic exercise program (such as walking, stationary biking, swimming) may begin within 2 weeks of symptoms. Jogging is usually not recommended, at least not until the pain is gone and muscles are stronger.

Patients should avoid exercises that put the lower back under pressure until the back muscles are well toned. Such exercises include leg lifts done in a facedown position, straight leg sit-ups, and leg curls using exercise equipment.

In all cases, patients should never force themselves to exercise if, by doing so, the pain increases.

Exercise plays a very beneficial role in chronic back pain. Repetition is the key to increasing flexibility, building endurance, and strengthening the specific muscles needed to support and neutralize the spine. Exercise should be considered as part of a broader program to return to normal home, work, and social activities. In this way, the positive benefits of exercise not only affect strength and flexibility but they also alter and improve patients' attitudes toward their disability and pain. Exercise may also be effective when combined with a psychological and motivational program, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy.

There are different types of back pain exercises. A 2005 review in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that stretching exercises worked best for reducing pain, while strengthening exercises were best for improving function.

Back pain exercises include:

Low Impact Aerobic Exercises. Low-impact aerobic exercises, such as swimming, bicycling, and walking, can strengthen muscles in the abdomen and back without over-straining the back. Programs that use strengthening exercises while swimming may be a particularly beneficial approach for many patients with back pain. Medical research has shown that pregnant women who engaged in a water gymnastics program have less back pain and are able to continue working longer.
Lumbar Extension Strength Training. Exercises called lumbar extension strength training are proving to be effective. Generally, these exercises attempt to strengthen the abdomen, improve lower back mobility, strength, and endurance, and enhance flexibility in the hip and hamstring muscles and tendons at the back of the thigh.
Yoga, Tai Chi, Chi Kung. Practices originating in Asia that combine low-impact physical movements and meditation may be very helpful. They are designed to achieve a physical and mental balance and can be very helpful in preventing recurrences of low back pain.
Pilates, an exercise practice that uses yoga principles, may be specifically helpful.
Flexibility Exercises. Flexibility exercises may help reduce pain. A stretching program may work best when combined with strengthening exercises.
Retraining Deep Muscles. Some studies suggest a link between low back pain and impaired motor control of deep muscles of the back and trunk. According to these studies, contraction exercises specifically designed to retrain these muscles may be effective for patients with both acute and chronic pain.

Perform the following exercises at least three times a week:

Partial Sit-ups. Partial sit-ups or crunches strengthen the abdominal muscles.

Keep the knees bent and the lower back flat on the floor while raising the shoulders up 3- 6 inches.
Exhale on the way up and inhale on the way down.
Perform this exercise slowly 8 - 10 times with the arms across the chest.

Pelvic Tilt. The pelvic tilt alleviates tight or fatigued lower back muscles.

Lie on the back with the knees bent and feet flat on the floor.
Tighten the buttocks and abdomen so that they tip up slightly.
Press the lower back to the floor, hold for one second, and then relax.
Be sure to breathe evenly.

Over time increase this exercise until it is held for 5 seconds. Then, extend the legs a little more so that the feet are further away from the body and try it again.

Stretching Lower-Back Muscles. The following are three exercises for stretching the lower back:

Lie on the back with knees bent and legs together. Keeping arms at the sides, slowly roll the knees over to one side until totally relaxed. Hold this position for about 20 seconds (while breathing evenly) and then repeat on the other side.
Lying on the back, hold one knee and pull it gently toward the chest. Hold for 20 seconds. Repeat with the other knee.
While supported on hands and knees, lift and straighten right hand and left leg at the same time. Hold for 3 seconds while tightening the abdominal muscles. The back should be straight. Alternate with the other arm and leg and repeat on each side 8 - 20 times.

Note: No one with low back pain should perform exercises that require bending over right after getting up in the morning. At that time, the disks are more fluid-filled and more vulnerable to pressure from this movement.

Physical therapy with a trained professional may be useful if pain has not improved within the first 3 weeks. It is, in fact, important for any person who has chronic low back pain to have an exercise program guided by professionals who understand the limitations and special needs of back pain and who can address individual health conditions. One study indicated that patients who planned their own exercise did worse than those in physical therapy or doctor-directed programs.

Physical therapy typically includes the following:

The first stage involves patient education and training the patient in correct movement. Sometimes heat or electro-therapies (such as therapeutic ultrasound or low-energy lasers) are used, although their benefits are unproven.
If back pain persists beyond 5 weeks, physical therapy is used for rehabilitation. It uses exercises to help the patient keep the spine in neutral positions during all daily activities.

Surgery

Diskectomy is the surgical removal of the diseased disk. The procedure relieves pressure on the spine. It has been performed for 40 years with increasingly less invasive techniques being developed over time. However, few studies have been conducted to determine its real effectiveness. In appropriate candidates it provides faster immediate relief than medical treatment, but long-term benefits (over 5 years) are uncertain. A number of minimally invasive variations are now available.

When the soft, gelatinous central portion of an intervertebral disk is forced through a weakened part of a disk, it is called a slipped disk. Most slipped disks (herniated disks) take place in the lumbar area of the spine. Slipped disks are one of the most common causes of lower back pain. The mainstay of treatment is an initial period of rest with pain and anti-inflammatory medications followed by physical therapy. If pain and symptoms persist, surgery to remove the herniated portion of the intervertebral disk may be needed.

Microdiskectomy. Microdiskectomy is the current standard procedure. It is performed through a small incision (1 to 1-1/2 inch). The back muscles are lifted and moved away from the spine. After identifying and moving the nerve root, the surgeon removes the injured disk tissue under it. The procedure does not change any of the structural supports of the spine, including joints, ligaments, and muscles.

Other less invasive procedures that are available including the following:

Endoscopic Diskectomy. Endoscopy employs a catheter (a thin tube) that contains tiny cameras and surgical instruments that are inserted through small incisions. Various endoscopic approaches are proving to be useful for back surgery.
Percutaneous Diskectomy. Percutaneous diskectomy (PAD). This approach uses a tube with a device at the tip that cuts away some of the nucleus pulposus and a vacuum that then sucks this gelatinous matter out.
Laser Diskectomy. A number of investigative surgical procedures employ lasers. For example, endoscopic laser foraminoplasty (ELF) uses lasers to locate the likely source of pain and remove diseased tissue. The incision requires little more than a Band-Aid and complications are minimal. Long-term benefits are unknown, however.

It is not clear yet if any of these less-invasive procedures are any more effective than the standard microdiskectomy.

Complications and Outlook. Many patients still have back pain after diskectomy that delays discharge from the hospital. Narcotics are usually needed. Adding an injected NSAID may speed resolution of pain.

Scar tissue is a significant problem, since it can cause persistent low back pain afterward. Anti-scarring agents or certain devices may help reduce surgical scars and thereby postoperative pain. Other complications of spinal surgery can include nerve and muscle damage, infection, and the need for reoperation.

Patients now often remain in bed only 3 - 4 days after disk surgery. It may take 4 - 6 weeks for full recovery, however. Gentle exercise may be recommended at first. Starting intensive exercise 4 - 6 weeks after a first-time disk surgery appears to be very helpful for speeding up recovery.

Operations that remove a vertebra (laminectomy) or shave off part of one (laminotomy) may be used in certain cases of spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis to decompress the nerve. They may also be used to remove benign tumors on the spine.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing lumbar spinal surgery.

Although either procedure often brings immediate relief from pain, a 1999 statistical study suggested that it is inappropriately performed in 60% or more of sciatica cases. There are small risks to the operation, and it is not always successful. Some recurrence of back pain and sciatica occurs in half to two-thirds of postoperative patients. Minimally invasive variations are under investigation.

In cases where abnormal vertebrae position or movement is responsible for severe and chronic back pain, such as spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis, surgeons may fuse vertebrae together. Fusion uses a bone graft or some other device to join the vertebrae together. In a 2001 study of patients with severe long-term back pain, 33% of patients who had spinal fusion had less back pain after 2 years, compared to 7% who received conservative treatment with physical therapy. Pain improved most in the 6 months following surgery. However, a 2005 clinical trial found that spinal fusion surgery worked no better than intensive rehabilitation in reducing disability. The intensive rehabilitation program included both physical and cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Many spinal fusion surgeries use a tiny hollow metal cage, which is implanted into the disk space. Bone is then removed from the patient's hip and packed inside the cage. Over time the bone grows through the holes and around the device, fusing the vertebrae. Alternatively, rather than performing a bone graft, the cage is filled with a sponge-like material containing a genetically-engineered protein called InFuse (rhBMP-2) that promotes bone to grow.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing spinal fusion.

A number of video-assisted techniques have been developed. The new techniques are less invasive than standard "open" surgical approaches, which uses wide incisions. To date, however, the newer procedures have higher complication rates than the open approaches and some medical centers have abandoned them.

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. Percutaneous vertebroplasty involves the injection of a cement-like bone substitute into vertebrae with compression fractures. It is done under endoscopic and x-ray guidance. The technique is proving useful for stabilizing the spine and relieving pain in patients with spinal compression fractures due to osteoporosis or cancer. A Mayo Clinic study found that patients who have the procedure have less back pain during rest and activity. A survey of records from more than 100 vertebroplasty patients revealed that most patients are more functional than before the procedure, and the benefits lasted for up to a year. Warning: The FDA has warned consumers that polymethylmethacrylate bone cement, used during vertebroplasty, could leak. Such leakage could cause damage to soft tissues and nerves. It is extremely important that the patient is sure that the health care provider has had significant experience performing the vertebroplasty procedure.

Percutaneous kyphoplasty. The health care provider injects bone cement into the space surrounding a fractured vertebra. (Vertebroplasty injects the cement directly into the vertebra.) Kyphoplasty is used to stabilize the spine and return spinal cord height to as normal as possible. However, a review published in 2006 by a nonprofit health services research agency found that the technique does not improve a person's back pain or quality of life. Kyphoplasty should only be done if bed rest, medicines, and physical therapy do not relieve back pain. Those with severe fractures or spinal infections should not have kyphoplasty.

Artificial Disk Replacement. Total disk replacement is an investigative procedure for some patients with severely damaged disks. The technique implants artificial disks (ProDisc, Link, SB Charite) consisting of two metal plates and a soft core. The surgery can be performed using a minimally invasive laparoscopic procedure, which is performed through tiny cuts using miniature tools and viewing devices. A study in 2003 was the first to suggest that it may eventually achieve results that are comparable to standard surgeries for disk herniation. An artificial cushioning device called the prosthetic disk nucleus (PDN) replaces only the inner gel-like core (nucleus pulposus) within the intervertebral space, rather than the entire disk. It is showing promise in early studies.

Nerve Blocks. A number of surgical techniques are available for relieving pain by impairing nerves that are causing pain due to impingement. Medical research has shown that 60% of the patients who received electrical stimulation to block the nerves reported at least 90% relief of pain after a year; 87% reported at least 60% relief.

Other Treatments

Radiofrequency Nerve Destruction. Radiofrequencies are being used to destroy nerves involved in the facet joints (or z-joints), which connect the vertebrae. Evidence is still weak on its benefits. A 2003 analysis suggested that it may be beneficial, however, for relief of neck pain and possibly for low back pain caused by problems in the facets joints. Serious infections have been reported.

Stem cell treatments. Researchers in England have pioneered a new technique to grow new spinal tissue using the patient's own stem cells. Stem cells are the building blocks of specific cells. Every cell in the human body starts (or "stems") from a stem cell. The new tissue will replace damaged spinal tissue and may relieve low back pain. Researchers expect the treatment to enter pre-clinical trials in about 1 year.

Specific Treatment for Acute Low Back Pain

Patients with short-term acute low back pain usually have the best results with the least aggressive treatments. The general approach is as follows:

Patients with no serious underlying cause should stay as active as possible within the limits of the back pain. (Bed rest is not recommended.)
Physical therapy or spinal manipulations may be helpful if pain continues for more than 2 - 3 weeks.
The patient should seek a specialist if pain continues for more than 1 month. (Some patients may need to see a specialist sooner if there is an underlying disorder, nerve damage, or injury.) Back pain due to medical conditions such as arthritis, osteoporosis, or pregnancy either goes away when the underlying condition disappears or is treated.

Home Care Tips for Relieving Pain

Resume normal activity as soon as possible. Bed rest is no longer recommended and may delay recovery. Activities should be done without strain or stretching.
Avoid intense exercise and physical activity, particularly heavy lifting and trunk twisting if there is acute back pain.
Try an over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory such as aspirin or ibuprofen. These medicines often provide significant benefits.
Apply heat (104°) to the painful area. Heat may work better than ibuprofen or acetaminophen. One group of researchers found that people with low back pain who wear low-level heat wraps for 8 hours a day have significant less pain and disability.
Try alternating between hot and cold packs. Some doctors recommend changing from hot to cold every 3 minutes and repeating this sequence three times. Others believe ice packs should be applied first. This routine should be done two or three times during the day. (Note: Heat or cold treatments do not have much effect on sciatica.)
Supportive back belts, braces, or corsets may help some people temporarily, but these products can reduce muscle tone over time and should be used only briefly.
Get plenty of sleep. Healthy sleep plays a vital role in recovery. Avoid caffeine in the afternoon and evening, and unwind before bed by taking a warm bath or practicing relaxation techniques. It is often difficult to get a good night's sleep when suffering from back pain, particularly because the pain can intensify at night. Some people may need medicine to help manage nighttime pain or treat sleeplessness. Lying curled up in a fetal position with a pillow between the knees or lying on the back with a pillow under the knees may help.

Prescription muscle relaxants may help some patients, although their benefits are uncertain. Once started, medications should be taken on a regular schedule in order to maintain consistent effectiveness.

Massage therapy may help relieve both acute and chronic low back pain. Several well-conducted studies have shown some benefit and suggest it may reduce the costs of care. Massage therapy may not be covered by health insurance.

Spinal manipulation may help, although it is not clear if it works any better than physical therapy or general care. Some experts recommend delaying this treatment until pain has persisted for 3 weeks, if possible, since the back pain will most likely have gone away on its own by then.

Acupuncture has not proven to have any value for acute low back pain in most patients, but may provide some help for patients with chronic low back pain.

Be aware of and avoid approaches that are not helpful. Certain approaches may even be harmful for acute low back pain. For example, permanent bipolar magnets (magnet therapies) can deactivate heart devices and must be kept at least six inches away from pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. These magnets have gained some popularity as a non-invasive method of relieving pain, but no studies support the claims.

Specific Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain

Evidence strongly suggests that only intensive treatment, involving both physical and psychological rehabilitation programs, can reduce pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain. Even with the best treatments, many patients with chronic back pain fail to have complete pain relief. They often must develop methods for coping with persistent pain.

Early treatments for severe or chronic low back pain are similar to those of acute uncomplicated low back pain.

Pain relievers, particularly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may help relieve symptoms, although they can have severe effects on the gastrointestinal tract over time. Some doctors have recommended long-term opioids for patients with severe chronic pain, but studies suggest they do not improve activity levels and can have significant side effects.

Corticosteroid injections and tricyclic antidepressants may be helpful for some patients.

Specific and regular exercise under the guidance of a trained professional is important for reducing pain and improving function, although patients often find it difficult to maintain therapy.

A new type of physical therapy, called Souchard's global postural re-education, helps relieve back pain symptoms due to degenerative disk disease, according to research presented at the 2005 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting. The method involves stretching weakened muscles around the spine and stomach. Researchers studied 102 people who had at least 7 months of severe back pain due to disk disease and who had received different types of treatment for more than 6 months. They attended the new physical therapy sessions two times the first week, then once a week for an average of 5 months. Ninety-two percent had significant pain relief and returned to their normal daily activities. The majority of those who had pain relief felt better after 3 weeks, and remained pain free for almost 2 years.

Alternative therapies may help. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and massage may relieve pain. Mind-body techniques such as relaxation and meditation may be help reducing stress-related pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy helps change behavior and attitudes toward pain.

Acupuncture may provide longer-lasting pain relief than physical therapy, according to a study in the British Medical Journal. For the study, 129 people were given either 6 acupuncture or physical therapy sessions. The study authors cautioned that the benefit of acupuncture greatly depended on the health care provider’s experience. Another study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, reported that acupuncture worked better than no treatment at all.

Yoga relieves low back pain better than conventional exercise or self-help books, according to a study published in the December 20, 2005, issue of Annals of Internal Medicine. For the study, 101 adults with low back pain who were randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group attended yoga classes and lessons; the second did aerobics, weight training, and stretching; and third group read a self-help book about back pain. After 12 weeks, those who took yoga could better perform daily activities requiring the back than those in the other two groups. After 26 weeks, those who took yoga had less pain and better back function, and used fewer pain relievers than the others.

Patients should always try all possible non-surgical treatments before opting for surgery. The most common reasons for surgery for low back pain are sciatica and spinal stenosis. Some experts believe that less than 1% of back pain patients need aggressive medical or surgical treatments.

Nevertheless, when it is appropriate, surgery can provide great relief. Many approaches and procedures are available or being investigated. However, there have been few well-conducted studies to determine if any type of back pain surgery works better than others, or if a single procedure is better than no surgery at all.

People who are obese and have low back pain may benefit from surgical weight loss surgery. A study in the journal Obesity Surgery found that bariatric (stomach stapling) surgery significantly improves the degree of disability in morbidly obese patients who have low back pain.

Before having any surgery, it is extremely important that the patient is sure that the surgeon has had significant experience with the procedure.

Nonsurgical Procedures. Patients with herniated disks should try nonsurgical treatments for at least 1 month before considering surgery. Nonsurgical procedures include spinal manipulation, massage therapy, and physical therapy. Patients should wait at least 2 - 3 weeks before using spinal manipulation.

Surgery. According to a 2001 review of studies, about 10% of patients have such bad back pain after 6 weeks that a diskectomy may be considered. Diskectomy is the standard procedure for herniated disks. For many of these patients, surgery may bring significant relief. In one study, 70% of patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica who had had surgery reported improvement. In most patients, the improvement was better than that achieved by 4 years of nonsurgical treatments. It is not clear if surgery maintains its advantage for longer periods of time.

Preventing Falls. Falling is a risk for patients with spinal stenosis. They should avoid alcohol and sedatives. Leg strengthening exercises such as walking and cycling may be helpful.

Nonsurgical Treatments. The use of common pain relievers such as NSAIDs, physical therapy, and spinal injections may be helpful for some patients.

Surgery. If pain is persistent, patients may require surgery, most often a procedure called decompressive laminectomy. Some patients may require spinal fusion as well. Studies suggest that surgery reduces back pain in many patients with spinal stenosis, at least for a few years. However, by 4 years after surgery, 30% of patients have severe pain again, and 10% have another operation. It should be noted that surgery does not always improve outcome and, in some cases, can even make it worse. Surgery can be an extremely effective approach, however, for certain patients whose severe back pain does not respond to conservative measures.

The general approach for patients with piriformis syndrome is corticosteroid injections and physical therapy. Botox injections are showing promise.

In carefully selected patients who do not respond to physical therapy and injections, some studies report dramatic pain relief with a surgical procedure that releases the piriformis muscle.

Prognosis

Most people with acute low back pain are back at work within a month and fully recover within a few months. According to one study, about a third of patients with uncomplicated low back pain significantly improved after a week; two-thirds recovered by 7 weeks.

However, studies now suggest that up to 75% of patients suffer at least one recurrence of back pain over the course of a year. In another study, after 4 years, less than half were symptom-free. Some doctors are approaching the problem as one that is not necessarily curable and which needs a consistent on-going approach.

Specific conditions can determine the rate of improvement:

In the majority of patients with herniated disks, the condition improves (although the actual physical improvement may be slower than the reduction in pain). Researchers attempted to identify factors most likely to predict an elevated risk for recurrent pain and found that only depression was a significant factor in the majority of those who had not recovered.
Spinal stenosis stabilizes in about 70% of cases and worsens in 15%.

Studies have found that when people stay home because of back injury, only 65% are back at work within a week. Nearly 14% are still absent at one month. If someone is on disability for more than 6 months, the chance of them returning to work is only 50%.

Low back pain accounts for significant losses in work days and dollars. In 1990, it cost the U.S. $23 billion in direct medical costs and possibly as much as $85 billion in total costs (such as lost productivity). Chronic back pain has become one of the most expensive causes of disability among workers under the age of 45. One study found that, although severe back pain comprised only 10% of workers compensation cases, it accounted for 86% of compensation costs.

Complications

Certain warning signs should alert a patient to see a doctor immediately for low back pain. Any very severe back pain warrants attention, particularly if any of the following conditions are present:

Being over 50
Recent injury
Severe pain
Pain awakens the person at night
Pain accompanied by fever (possible infection)
Pain increased by lying down
Pain unrelated to movement
Pain lasts for a month, and is accompanied by unexplained fever or weight loss
History or chronic use of corticosteroids
Intravenous drug use
History of urinary tract infection
In children, any severe neck or back pain or pain that persists for more than 3 days

Cauda equina syndrome is the impingement of the cauda equina (the four strands of nerves leading through the lowest part of the spine). It is an emergency condition that can cause severe complications of the bowel or bladder. Cauda equina syndrome is usually caused by massive extrusion of the disk material. It can cause permanent incontinence if not promptly treated with surgery. Symptoms of the cauda equina syndrome include:

Dull back pain
Weakness or numbness in the buttocks, in the area between the legs, or in the inner thigh, backs of legs, or feet. May cause difficulty in standing or stumbling.
An inability to control urination and defecation
Pain accompanied by fever (can indicate an infection)

Prevention

Exercise, diet, stress, and weight all have a significant influence on back pain. Changing certain lifestyle factors can help reduce and, possibly, prevent backaches.

Smokers are at higher risk for back problems, perhaps because smoking decreases blood circulation. The link may also be due to an unhealthy lifestyle in general. A British study found that young adults who were long-term smokers were nearly twice as likely to develop low back pain as nonsmokers.

Sedentary Lifestyle. People who do not exercise regularly face an increased risk for low back pain, especially when they perform sudden, stressful activities such as shoveling, digging, or moving heavy items. Although no definitive studies have been done to prove the relationship between lack of exercise and low back pain, some doctors believe that an inactive lifestyle may be to blame in some cases. Lack of exercise leads to the following conditions that may threaten the back:

Stiff muscles can make it hard to move, rotate, and bend the back.
Weak stomach muscles can increase the strain on the back and cause an abnormal tilt of the pelvis.
Weak back muscles may increase the risk for disk compression.
Obesity puts more weight on the spine and increase pressure on the vertebrae and disks. However, studies report only a weak association between obesity and low back pain.

Improper or Intense Exercise. Improper or excessive exercise may also increase one's chances for back pain.

Some research suggests that over time, high-impact exercise may increase the risk for degenerative disk disease. A survey of people who played tennis, however, found no increased risk for low back pain or sciatica.
Between 30 - 70% of cyclists experience low back pain. One 1999 study reported that 70% of cyclists reported improvement simply by adjusting the angle of the bicycle seat.
Improper exercise instruction and inattention to body movements can lead to back trouble. For example, a single jerky golf swing or incorrect use of exercise equipment (especially free weights, nautilus, and rowing machines) can cause serious back injuries.

The way a person moves, stands, or sleeps plays a major role in back pain.

Maintaining good posture is very important. This means keeping the ears, shoulders, and hips in a straight line with the head up and stomach pulled in. It is best not to stand for long periods of time. If it is necessary, walk as much as possible and wear shoes without heels, preferably with cushioned soles. Use a low foot stool and alternate resting each foot on top of it.
Sitting puts the most pressure on the back. Chairs should either have straight backs or low-back support. If possible, chairs should swivel to avoid twisting at the waist, have arm rests, and adjustable backs. While sitting, the knees should be a little higher than the hip, so a low stool or hassock is useful to put the feet on. A small pillow or rolled towel behind the lower back helps relieve pressure while either sitting or driving.
Riding in and driving a car for long periods of time increases stress. Move the car seat as far forward as possible to avoid bending forward. The back of the seat should not be reclined more than 30 degrees. If possible, the seat bottom should be tilted slightly upward in front. A traveler should stop and walk around about every hour. Avoid lifting or carrying objects immediately after the ride.

Anyone who engages in heavy lifting should take precautions when lifting and bending.

If an object is too heavy or awkward, get help.
Spread your feet apart to give a wide base of support.
Stand as close as possible to the object being lifted.
Bend at the knees, not at the waist. As you move up and down, tighten stomach muscles and tuck buttocks in so that the pelvis is rolled under and the spine remains in a natural "S' curve. (Even when not lifting an object, always try to use this posture when stooping down.)
Hold objects close to the body to reduce the load on the back.
Lift using the leg muscles, not those in the back.
Stand up without bending forward from the waist.
Never twist from the waist while bending or lifting any heavy object. If you need to move an object to one side, point your toes in that direction and pivot toward it.
If an object can be moved without lifting, pull it, don't push.

There are four natural curves in the spinal column: the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral curvature. The curves, along with the intervertebral disks, help to absorb and distribute stresses that occur from everyday activities such as walking or from more intense activities such as running and jumping.

Resources

www.niams.nih.gov -- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
www.aaos.org -- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
www.arthritis.org -- Arthritis Foundation
www.spine.org -- North American Spine Society
www.apta.org -- American Physical Therapy Association
www.ampainsoc.org -- American Pain Society
www.theacpa.org -- American Chronic Pain Association
www.iasp-pain.org -- International Association for the Study of Pain

References

Apkarian AV, Sosa Y, Sonty S, Levy RM, Harden RN, Parrish TB, et al. Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density. J Neurosci. 2004;24(46):10410-10415.

Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R; Spine Stabilisation Trial Group. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1233.

Filler AG, Haynes J, Jordan SE, Prager J, Villablanca JP, Farahani K, et al. Sciatica of nondisc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance neurography and interventional magnetic resonance imaging with outcome study of resulting treatment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(2):99-115.

Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM, Hall DJ, Chapple DC. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2369-77; discussion 2378.

Friedrich M, Gittler G, Arendasy M, Friedrich KM. Long-term effect of a combined exercise and motivational program on the level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(9):995-1000.

Frost H, Stewart-Brown S. Acupressure for low back pain. BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):680-1.

Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV, Koes BW. Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):765-775.

Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):776-785.

Mercado AC, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Cote P. Passive coping is a risk factor for disabling neck or low back pain. Pain. 2005;117(1-2):51-57.

Melissas J, Kontakis G, Volakakis E, Tsepetis T, Alegakis A, Hadjipavlou A. The effect of surgical weight reduction on functional status in morbidly obese patients with low back pain. Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):378-81.

Pneumaticos SG, Chatziioannou SN, Hipp JA, Moore WH, Esses SI. Low back pain: prediction of short-term outcome of facet joint injection with bone scintigraphy. Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):693-8.

Ratcliffe J, Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Brazier J. A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2006 Sep 23;333(7569):626.

Richardson SM, Curran JM, Chen R, et al. The differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocyte-like cells on poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006 Aug;27(22):4069-78.

Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Erro J, Miglioretti DL, Deyo RA. Comparing Yoga, Exercise, and a Self-Care Book for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143: 849 - 856.

Tao XG, Bernacki EJ. A randomized clinical trial of continuous low-level heat therapy for acute muscular low back pain in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Dec;47(12):1298-306.

Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Gray LA, Goodnature BA, Everson SL, Comstock BA, Jarvik JG. Evaluation of vertebroplasty with a validated outcome measure: the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(10):2652-7.

Review Date:
3/19/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com