FitSugar

Milk Breakdown

FitSugar — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:45:00 -0800

Isn't it amazing how many types of milk are available? You can get cow's milk, but if you're lactose intolerant or vegan, you can use soy milk instead. If you're worried about the possible health risks of eating too much soy, you can pick up some rice milk. If you're not into the watery consistency, then there's always almond milk. Basically, you have a lot of options.

So nutritionally speaking, ever wonder how all these types of milk compare? If so then read more

Serving Size = 1 cup	Calories	Total Fat (g)	Saturated Fat (g)	Cholesterol (mg)	Carbs (g)	Sugars (g)	Protein (g)
Skim Milk	90	0	0	less than 5	13	12	8
1% Milk	110	2.5	1.5	15	13	12	8
2% Milk	190	16	2	20	7	3	8
2% Chocolate Milk	170	5	3	20	24	23	8
Whole Milk	150	8	5	35	12	12	8
Half and Half	320	28	16	80	8	8	8
Heavy Cream	800	96	56	320	0	0	0
1% Buttermilk	100	2.5	1.5	15	12	12	8
Plain Soy Milk	130	4	.5	0	13	7	11
Vanilla Soy milk	150	3	0	0	23	15	7
Chocolate Soy Milk	180	4	1	0	28	14	8
Plain Rice Milk	120	2.5	0	0	24	11	1
Vanilla Rice Milk	120	2.5	0	0	23	10	1
Chocolate Rice Milk	160	3	0	0	34	28	2
Almond Milk	90	2.5	0	0	16	14	1

Well there you have it. If you're watching your calorie intake, skim milk or almond milk are definitely the way to go. If you're trying to lower your cholesterol, I'd stick with cholesterol-free soy, rice, or almond milk. If you're trying to get more protein in your diet, than surprisingly enough, plain soy milk is the best choice. When choosing which one, it all comes down to your dietary or ethical preference, but I'd only use heavy cream in small quantities.

Movie Theater Food Breakdown

FitSugar — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 09:45:00 -0800

This holiday season many of us will be flocking to the movies to see the latest and greatest hitting the theaters.

Unfortunately we may not realize that the snacks we are paying WAY too much for have WAY more calories than we may realize. So to help you through, I've broken down some movie theater favorites:

Large Buttered Popcorn (20 cups): 1500 calories, 116g fat, 90g carbs
Hot Dog (1 dog with bun): 305 calories, 4.5g fat, 23g carbs
Nachos with Cheese (large, 4 oz): 1101 calories, 59g fat, 131.5g carbs
Soft Pretzel (large): 483 calories, 4.5g fat, 99g carbs
Cotton Candy (2.5 oz): 300 calories, 0g fat, 74g carbs
Junior Mints (3 oz): 320 calories, 5g fat, 68g carbs

There's lots more, so read more

Milk Duds (3 oz): 340 calories, 12g fat, 56g carbs
Sno-Caps (3.1 oz): 360 calories, 16g fat, 60g carbs
Raisinets (3.5 oz): 380 calories, 16g fat, 64g carbs
Gummi Bears (4 oz): 390 calories, 0g fat, 90g carbs
Goobers (3.5 oz): 525 calories, 35g fat, 55g carbs
Twizzlers (6 oz): 600 calories, 4g fat, 136g carbs
M&M's (5.3 oz): 735 calories, 31.5g fat, 105g carbs
Skittles (6.75 oz): 765 calories, 9g fat, 166.5g carbs
Reese's Pieces (8 oz): 1200 calories, 60g fat, 138g carbs
Starburst (24 pieces): 480 calories, 10.5g fat, 99g carbs
Coca-Cola with ice (large, 3 pints, 18.9 fl oz): 353 calories, 0g fat, 88.4g carbs

Osteoporosis

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:56 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Drug Approvals

In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved zoledronic acid (Reclast) for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment. Zoledronic acid is given as an injection once a year. A 2007 study in the New England Journal of Medicine indicated that zoledronic acid can significantly reduce the risk of spine, hip, and other fractures.
In 2007, the FDA approved raloxifene (Evista) for prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and postmenopausal women at high risk for breast cancer. Raloxifene was previously approved for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Calcium and Vitamin D for Osteoporosis Prevention

In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration proposed allowing manufacturers of food and supplements to put a health claim on their products stating that the combination of calcium and vitamin D can reduce the risk of osteoporosis.
In 2007, the National Osteoporosis Foundation updated its daily intake guidelines to recommend 1,200 mg of calcium, and 800 - 1,000 IU of vitamin D3, for adults age 50 and older.
Calcium plus vitamin D is effective in preventing osteoporosis in people age 50 years and older, according to a 2007 review in the Lancet. The researchers found that a minimum of 1,200 mg of calcium and at least 800 IU of vitamin D per day gave the most protection.

Fosamax: Taking a Break (Without Breaking a Bone)

Women at low risk for fracture may be able to temporarily stop taking alendronate (Fosamax) after 5 years, suggests a 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Antidepressants and Osteoporosis Risk

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most commonly used class of antidepressants, may increase the risk for bone loss in both older men and women, according to several studies published in 2007 in the Archives of Internal Medicine. SSRIs include fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), and paroxetine (Paxil). The researchers did not find that other types of antidepressants are associated with reduced bone mineral density.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a disease of the skeleton in which bones become brittle and prone to fracture. In other words, the bone loses density. Osteoporosis is diagnosed when bone density has decreased to the point where fractures occur with mild stress.

The skeleton consists of groups of bones which protect and move the body.

Until a healthy person is around age 40, the process of breaking down and building up bone by cells called osteoclasts and osteoblasts is a nearly perfectly coupled system, with one phase stimulating the other. As a person ages, or in the presence of certain conditions, this system breaks down and the two processes become out of sync. The reasons why this occurs during aging are not clear. Some individuals have a very high turnover rate of bone, some have a very gradual turnover, but the breakdown of bone eventually overtakes the build-up.

The Function of Bones. The skeleton has a dual function:

It provides structural support for muscles and organs.
It also serves as a depot for the body’s calcium and other essential minerals, such as phosphorus and magnesium.

The skeleton holds 99% of the body’s calcium. The remaining 1% circulates in the blood and is essential for crucial bodily functions, ranging from muscle contraction to nerve function to blood clotting.

Bone Turnover: the Breakdown and Growth of Bones. Like other organs in the body, bone tissue is constantly being broken down and reformed again. This turnover is necessary for growth, for repair of minor damage that occurs from everyday stress, and for the maintenance of a properly functioning body. Two essential cells are involved in this process:

Osteoblast cells are produced by bone cells and are the bone builders. They rebuild the skeleton, first by filling in the holes with collagen, and then by laying down crystals of calcium and phosphorus.
Osteoclast cells are formed from certain blood cells and are responsible for the breakdown, or resorption, of the skeleton. These cells dig holes into the bone and release the small amounts of calcium into the bloodstream that are necessary for other vital functions.

Each year, about 10 - 30% of the adult skeleton is remodeled in this way. The bone build up (formation)-break down (resorption) balance is controlled by a complex mix of hormones and chemical factors. If bone resorption occurs at a greater rate than bone build up, your bone loses density and puts you at risk for osteoporosis.

In women, estrogen loss after menopause is associated with rapid resorption and loss of bone density. This group, then, is at highest risk for osteoporosis and therefore for fracture.

There are two primary kinds of osteoporosis: type I and type II:

Type I. Type I, or high turnover, osteoporosis occurs in 5 - 20% of women, most often between the ages of 50 and 75. This is because of the sudden postmenopausal decrease in estrogen levels, which results in a rapid depletion of calcium from the skeleton. This is associated with fractures that occur when the vertebrae compress together, causing a collapse of the spine. It is also associated with fractures of the hip, wrist, or forearm caused by falls or minor accidents. Women have a higher risk for type 1 osteoporosis than men.
Type II. Type II, or low turnover, osteoporosis (also known as age-related or senile osteoporosis) results when the process of resorption and formation of bone are no longer coordinated, and bone breakdown overcomes bone building. (This occurs with age in everyone to some degree.) Type II osteoporosis affects both men and women and is primarily associated with leg and spinal fractures. Older women can have both type I and type II osteoporosis.

Click the icon to see an image of a compression fracture.

What determines the existence of osteoporosis, whether type I or type II, is the amount of calcium left in the skeleton and whether it places a person at risk for fracture. Someone who has exceptionally dense bones to begin with will probably never lose enough calcium to reach the point where osteoporosis occurs, whereas a person who has low bone density could easily develop osteoporosis despite losing only a relatively small amount of calcium.

Secondary osteoporosis is caused by other conditions, such as hormonal imbalances, diseases, or medications (such as corticosteroids or anti-seizure drugs).

Click the icon to see an image of osteoporosis.

Causes

Because the patterns of reforming and resorbing bone often vary from patient to patient, experts believe several different factors account for this problem. Important chemicals (such as estrogen, parathyroid hormone, and vitamin D) and blood factors that affect cell growth are involved with this process. Changes in levels of any of these factors could play a role in the development of osteoporosis.

Although ordinarily associated with women, sex hormones play a role in osteoporosis in both genders, most likely by controlling the birth and duration of life of both osteoclasts (bone breakers) and osteoblasts (bone builders).

Women and Estrogen. Experts are still puzzled by the rapid decline in bone density after menopause, when a woman’s ovaries stop producing estrogen. Estrogen comes in several forms:

The uterus is a hollow muscular organ located in the female pelvis between the bladder and rectum. The ovaries produce the eggs that travel through the fallopian tubes. Once the egg has left the ovary it can be fertilized and implant itself in the lining of the uterus. The main function of the uterus is to nourish the developing fetus prior to birth.

The most potent form of estrogen is estradiol. Estradiol deficiency appears to be a very strong factor in the development of osteoporosis.
The other important but less powerful estrogens are estrone and estriol.

The ovaries produce most of the estrogen in the body, but it can also be formed in other tissues, such as body fat, skin, and muscle. After menopause, some amounts of estrogen continue to be manufactured in the peripheral body fat. Even though the ovaries have stopped producing estrogens directly, they continue to be a source of the male hormone testosterone, which converts into estradiol.

Estrogen may have an impact on bone density in various ways:

Estrogen’s most important effect on osteoporosis appears to be prevention of bone breakdown (resorption). Some research suggests that estrogen may control the life span of osteoclasts, the cells responsible for bone breakdown.
One study reported that part of estrogen’s beneficial actions may involve maintaining normal levels of vitamin D, an important nutrient in bone protection.

Men and Androgens and Estrogen. In men, the most important androgen (male hormone) is testosterone, which is produced in the testes. Other androgens are produced in the adrenal glands. Androgens are converted to estrogen in various parts of a man’s body, including bone.

Click the icon to see an image of the adrenal glands.

Studies have suggested that the loss of estrogen as well as testosterone may contribute to bone loss in elderly men. In one study, elderly men were first given a drug that blocked their normal hormones and then were given estrogen and testosterone patches. When the estrogen patch was removed, the bone breakdown process accelerated. When both patches were removed, the number of the bone-building cells (the osteoblasts) decreased. In other words, both hormones appeared to be integral to bone function in men.

Low levels of vitamin D and high levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are associated with hip fracture in women after menopause:

Vitamin D is a vitamin with hormone-like properties. It is essential for the absorption of calcium into the bone and for normal bone growth. Lower levels result in impaired calcium absorption, which in turn causes an increase in PTH.
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is produced by the parathyroid glands. These are four small glands located on the surface of the thyroid gland. They are the most important regulators of calcium levels in the blood. When calcium levels are low, the glands secrete more PTH, which then increases blood calcium levels. High persistent levels of PTH stimulate bone resorption (bone loss).

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin D.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin D.

Click the icon to see an image of the parathyroid glands.

Several studies on family members, including twins, have strongly suggested that genetic factors help determine bone density. Some examples include the following:

Of particular interest are genetic factors that affect vitamin D, a critical nutrient for calcium absorption in the body.
Many studies are looking at abnormalities in genes that may cause deficiencies in estrogen receptors, molecules that help estrogen work on cells. Estrogen is important in maintaining bone density in both men and women.

Corticosteroids. More than 30 million Americans have disorders that are commonly treated using corticosteroid drugs (also called glucocorticoids or steroids). Oral corticosteroids can reduce bone mass in both men and women. It is not clear whether inhaled steroids carry the same risks, but some studies indicate that they may cause bone loss when taken at higher doses for long periods of time. (Children on inhaled steroids may have temporary impaired growth, but they do not appear to be at risk for bone loss.)

Antidepressants. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) -- a class of antidepressants that includes fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), and sertraline (Zoloft) -- may be associated with bone loss in both older men and women, according to two 2007 studies in the Archives of Internal Medicine. The researchers did not find an increased risk for bone loss with other types of antidepressants.

Diuretics. Diuretics, which are used to treat high blood pressure, have different effects on osteoporosis, depending on the type. Loop diuretics, such as furosemide (Lasix), increase the kidneys’ excretion of calcium, which can lead to thinning bones. Thiazide diuretics, on the other hand, protect against bone loss, but this protective effect ends after use is discontinued.

Contraceptives. Hormonal contraceptives that use progestin without estrogen (such as Depo-Provera injection or other progestin-based contraceptives), can cause loss of bone density. For this reason, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that Depo-Provera injections should not be used for longer than 2 years. Some, but not all, studies suggest that combination estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives increase the risk for osteoporosis later in life. Women who take birth control pills should be sure to get adequate calcium and vitamin D from diet or supplements.

Other Medications. Anti-epileptic (anti-seizure) drugs increase the risk for bone loss (as does epilepsy itself). Other drugs that increase the risk for bone loss include the blood-thinning drug heparin, and hormonal drugs that suppress estrogen (such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists). A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested that long-term (greater than 1 year) use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase the risk for hip fractures. PPIs are used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (heartburn) and include omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), and esomeprazole (Nexium).

Predisposing Medical Conditions. Osteoporosis can be secondary to several other conditions, including alcoholism, diabetes, hyperthyroidism, epilepsy, chronic liver or kidney disease, celiac disease, scurvy, rheumatoid arthritis, leukemia, cirrhosis, gastrointestinal diseases, vitamin D deficiency, hypogonadism (impaired development of reproductive organs), lymphoma, hyperparathyroidism, and rare genetic disorders such as Marfan and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Symptoms

Many people confuse osteoporosis with arthritis and believe they can wait for symptoms such as swelling and joint pain to occur before seeing a doctor. However, the mechanisms that cause arthritis are entirely different from those in osteoporosis. Osteoporosis usually becomes quite advanced before symptoms appear.

All too often, osteoporosis becomes apparent in dramatic fashion: a fracture of a vertebra (backbone), hip, forearm, or any bony site if sufficient bone mass is lost. These fractures frequently occur after apparently minor trauma, such as bending over, lifting, jumping, or falling from the standing position.

Pain, disfigurement, and debilitation are common in the latter stages of the disease. Early spinal compression fractures may go undetected for a long time, but after a large percentage of calcium has been lost, the vertebrae in the spine start to collapse, gradually causing a stooped posture called kyphosis, or a "dowager’s hump." Although this is usually painless, patients may lose as much as 6 inches in height.

Click the icon to see an image of osteoporosis.

Fractures

Bone density loss from osteoporosis is a major cause of disability and death in the elderly, mostly due to subsequent fractures. The lifetime risk of spinal fracture in women is about one in three, and that for hip fracture is one in six. Women at highest risk for fractures are those with low bone density plus a history of fractures, particularly nonviolent fractures.

Click the icon to see an animation about osteoporosis.

Each year, there are an estimated 500,000 spinal fractures, 300,000 hip fractures, 200,000 broken wrists and 300,000 fractures of other bones. About 80% of these fractures occur after relatively minor falls or accidents.

Between 25 - 60% of women older than age 60 develop spinal compression fractures. Studies on men with osteoporosis report that they have a 6% risk for hip fracture and between 16 - 25% risk for any fractures related to osteoporosis.

Click the icon to see an image of a compression fracture.

Click the icon to see an image of a hip fracture.

Unfortunately, studies continue to report inadequate treatment after a fracture. In a major 2003 study, for example, only 8.4% of women who had sustained fractures were tested for osteoporosis. Worse, less than half of these women received any treatment for osteoporosis. Overall, in the study fewer than 4% of men and half of women who had sustained fractures were evaluated and treated according to recommended guidelines. The older a woman was, the less likely she was to have adequate treatment.

Risk Factors for Fracture and Falling. The risk for fracture itself in people with low bone density is compounded by certain features. Having multiple risk factors for osteoporosis itself poses a higher risk for fractures. However, not all older women with osteoporosis develop fractures. There is some evidence that the body partially compensates after menopause by increasing bone strength, which can help offset the risk for fracture.

Falling, of course, is the primary risk factor for fracture. So, additional risk factors for fracture are those that increase the risk for falling. They include:

Having chronic medical problems (emphysema, heart disease, stroke, arthritis, and depression), with the risk increasing with multiple health problems. Such problems may account for 30% of falls in older women.
Taking multiple medications (especially tranquilizers and antidepressants).
Poor physical function, importantly slow gait and reduced muscle strength. Inactivity that results in weak thigh muscles and poor balance particularly puts any older person at risk for fracture and particularly those with low bone density.
Poor concentration or mental impairment.
Impaired vision.
Hazardous environment (such as the presence of throw rugs in the house).

Between 25 - 36% of women who experience a hip fracture die within a year afterward, and about a quarter of the patients require nursing home treatment. The mortality rates after major fractures may be even higher in older men than in older women. Mortality rates after hip fractures declined from the 1960s through the early 1980s, but they have since leveled off. Whether or not medical advances can improve mortality rates in the future, prevention of osteoporosis is extremely important.

Risk Factors

Gender. An estimated 10 million adults in the United States have osteoporosis and another 34 million have low bone mass that places them at risk for developing osteoporosis. A 2004 report from the Surgeon General's office estimates that by 2020, half of all Americans over age 50 could be at risk for this condition. Eighty percent of people with osteoporosis are women. Men start with higher bone density and lose calcium at a slower rate than women, which is why their risk is far lower. Nevertheless, after age 50, bone loss increases and, according to recent studies, more rapidly than previously thought.

Ethnicity. Although adults from all ethnic groups are susceptible to developing osteoporosis, Caucasian and Asian women and men face a comparatively greater risk. About 20% of non-Hispanic white and Asian women older than age 50 have osteoporosis, and over 50% are at risk due to low bone mass. Osteoporosis affects 10% of Hispanic women (49% at risk) and 5% of non-Hispanic black women (35% at risk). Body type can also be a factor. Osteoporosis is more common in women who have a small, thin body frame and bone structure.

Events associated with estrogen deficiencies are the primary risk factors for osteoporosis in women.

Natural and Surgical Causes of Estrogen Deficiency.

Menopause. Within 5 years after menopause, the risk for fracture increases dramatically. Fractures occurring during this period are more likely to occur in the wrist or spine than the hip, but their occurrence is a strong predictor of later severe osteoporosis and hip fracture.
Surgical removal of ovaries.
Missing periods for 3 months or longer.
Never giving birth.
Pregnancy and nursing do not increase the risk for osteoporosis even though during those times calcium is diverted from the mother to the baby. A factor believed to be associated with reduced bone density is elevated at a constant level during nursing, but as the baby is weaned, levels of the factor decline and bone formation is restored.

Female Athlete Triad. In athletes, excessive exercise plays a major role in many cases of anorexia (and, to a lesser degree, bulimia), which in turn increases the risk for low estrogen levels and bone loss. The term "female athlete triad" in fact, is now a common and serious disorder facing young female athletes and dancers and describes the combined presence of the following problems:

Osteoporosis
Amenorrhea (absence or irregular menstruation)
Eating disorders

Some specific risk factors in men include:

Hormonal deficiencies, including both testosterone and estrogen, which occur in older men (although much more slowly than in women). Estrogen deficiencies may also play a major role in osteoporosis in older men. It is unknown yet what normal estrogen levels are in men.
Medical conditions that can reduce testosterone levels, such as prostate cancer treatments, testicular surgery, and mumps.
Hypogonadism, which is a severe deficiency in the primary hormone that signals the process leading to the release of testosterone and other important reproductive hormones.

Of concern, are studies suggesting that men who have osteoporosis and suffer hip fractures are far less likely to be tested and treated for low bone density than are women. In one study, only 27% of men were treated for osteoporosis compared to 71% of women.

Dietary Factors. Diet plays an important role in preventing and speeding up bone loss in men and women. Calcium and vitamin D deficiencies, of course, are important factors in the risk for osteoporosis. Other dietary factors may also be harmful or protective for certain people.

Calcium requires adequate vitamin D in order to be absorbed by the body. In the United States, many food sources of calcium such as milk are fortified with vitamin D.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of calcium.

Lack of Exercise. Lack of exercise can put thinner people at risk for osteoporosis.

Being Underweight. Being underweight is a risk factor for osteoporosis in men as well as women. (Shortness, thinness, and narrow hips all increase the risk for fracture in people with low bone density.)

Lack of Sunlight. The photochemical effect of sunlight on the skin is a primary source for vitamin D. Bone formation peaks in the summer and bone breakdown increases in the winter. People who avoid sun exposure to prevent skin cancer may be at risk for vitamin D deficiency, particularly it they are elderly.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin D.

Smoking. Women who smoke, particularly after menopause, have a significantly greater chance of spine and hip fractures than those who don’t smoke. Men who smoke also have lower bone density.

Diabetes. Diabetes changes bone quality and density and increases the risk for osteoporosis, but the effects differ depending on type:

Type 1 diabetes is associated with a slightly reduced bone density, putting patients at risk for osteoporosis and possibly fracture.
Type 2 diabetes, on the other hand, is associated with an increased bone density. In such cases, the bone quality itself may be impaired, since people with type 2 diabetes are still at higher risk for fractures.

Older patients with any diabetes type are at high risk for falling, which compounds the risk for fracture.

The maximum density that bones achieved during the growing years is a major factor in whether a person goes on to develop osteoporosis. Persons, usually women, who never develop peak bone mass in early life are at high risk for osteoporosis later on. Children at risk for low peak bone mass include children who are:

Born prematurely
Have anorexia nervosa (more common in girls)
Young, highly competitive athletes
Take oral corticosteroid drugs (inhaled steroids, which are common in asthma treatments, appear to pose a very low risk or none at all)
Have certain medical conditions (cystic fibrosis, epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease, and celiac disease)
Have delayed puberty

Although to a large extent genetics predict bone health, exercise and good nutrition during the first three decades of life (when peak bone mass is reached) are still excellent safeguards against osteoporosis (and countless other health problems).

Diagnosis

About 20 - 30% of Caucasian women in the U.S. can expect to be affected by osteoporosis, including having a spinal fracture, after age 60. Hispanic, Asian, and Native American women have an even higher risk. Nearly all of them are unaware of the condition and so fail to seek a diagnosis. Even worse, studies continue to report inadequate evaluation for osteoporosis even after a fracture.

Evidence suggests that screening for osteoporosis can help prevent fractures. Expert groups now recommend bone density screening for the following people:

All women over age 65.
Any postmenopausal women under 65 years with risk factors for osteoporosis (being thin, being a smoker, having a family history of osteoporosis, corticosteroids use, or any serious high-risk condition, such as hyperthyroidism or early menopause).
Any older men or women who suffer a fracture. (Unfortunately, studies suggest that only a minority of these patients are evaluated and treated for osteoporosis. Men are especially less likely to be tested.)

Whether perimenopausal women should be screened is unclear. (Perimenopause is the period that extends a few years before and after menopause, usually ages 50 - 59.) Some experts believe that women as young as 21 who have strong risk factors for osteoporosis (such as anorexia or absence of menstruation due to over-exercising) should consider being tested. It is also important that older women continue to get bone density tests. A 2006 study found that only 10% of women over age 75 receive bone density screenings, even though they are the age group most likely to have hip fractures.

Bone Densitometry. The standard technique for determining bone density is a form of bone densitometry called dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). DEXA is simple and painless and takes 2 - 4 minutes. The machine measures bone density by detecting the extent to which bones absorb photons that are generated by very low-level x-rays. (Photons are atomic particles with no charge.) Measurements of bone mineral density are generally given as the average concentrations of calcium in areas that are scanned.

A bone density scan measures the density of bone in a person. The lower the density of a bone the higher the risk of fractures. A bone scan, along with a patient's medical history, is a useful aid in evaluating the probability of a fracture and whether any preventative treatment is needed. A bone density scan has the advantage of being painless and exposing the patient to only a small amount of radiation.

Bone mineral density is usually measured at the hip rather than the spine or wrist, which appears to be the most predictive of hip fracture. (Hip fractures are the most dangerous fractures, particularly in women older than sixty.) The bone density in the spine may also be measured. (Spinal bone density in older people however may be misleading. Bone density in this group may increase because of compression on the spinal bones from arthritic changes in the spine. Therefore, bone density measurements may be normal or even high, but the patient may actually be at risk for fracture.)

Click the icon to see an image of a hip fracture.

Ultrasound. Ultrasound techniques measure bone density in the heels, fingers, and leg bones. In early studies, advanced ultrasound techniques, such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS), are promising for improving accuracy in predicting fractures when used with DEXA. Ultrasound itself is less expensive than DEXA and uses no radiation. Ultrasound bone tests are sometimes given at health fairs or other non-medical settings. It should be noted that these results typically vary widely from measurements of the hipbone and are not reliable when used alone.

Quantitative Computed Tomography. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans, a form of CT scans, can provide highly detailed information about spinal density. Radiation doses from this technique are higher than the others. Whether QCT predicts fracture risk accurately is, however, unknown.

Osteoporosis is diagnosed when bone density has decreased to the point where fractures will happen with mild stress, the so-called fracture threshold. This is determined by measuring bone density and comparing the results with the norm. However, low scores on bone density are not very accurate in determining fracture risk without consideration of other risk factors for fracture.

In general, doctors take the following steps to determine osteoporosis:

Bone mineral density ) is measured, typically in the hipbone, using bone densitometry.
Measurements of bone mineral density are given as mg/cm.² This is the average concentration of bone mineral in the areas that are being scanned. In general, bone is normal if results are greater than 833 mg/cm.² Low bone density (osteopenia) is between 833 and 648 mg/cm.² Osteoporosis is diagnosed with results below 648 mg/cm.²

These measurements still do not always indicate the true risk for fracture. The doctor also assesses risk factors and other considerations. The next step is to compare the patient's bone mineral density to normal bone density, which is defined as the average bone mineral density in the hipbones of premenopausal Caucasian women. (This group is used as the basis for the norm because of their high risk and greater proportion in the American population.)

The health professional then uses this comparison to determine her standard deviation (SD) from this norm. Standard deviation results are given as Z and T scores:

A T score gives the standard deviation of the patient in relationship to the norm in young adults. Doctors often use the T-score and other risk factors to determine the risk for fracture.
A Z score gives the standard deviation of the patient in relationship to the norm in her own age group. Z scores may be used to monitor the effects of treatments in women who have been diagnosed with osteoporosis.

For example, the lifetime risks for a younger woman with a specific T-score would be higher than the same scores in an older woman because the younger woman would have a longer time to lose bone density. In general, the T scores in a 55-year-old woman suggest the following degrees of risk for hip fracture.

One standard deviation or less below the norm indicates normal bone mineral density. (This carries a lifetime chance for a hip fracture of up to about 20%, depending on age and other risk factors.)
Between 1 and 2.5 standard deviation s below normal defines osteopenia, which is low bone density. This carries between a 20 - 50% lifetime risk for fracture.
More than 2.5 standard deviation s predicts osteoporosis and over a 60% chance for hip fracture. Additional risk factors increase the risk. They include low weight, smoking, risks for falling, and especially a history of previous fractures. For example, in women 65 years old with low bone density but no adverse factors, the risk for fracture is 4.3% in 1 year and 28.6% over 5 years. In similar women with a previous fracture, the probability of fracture at 1 year is 11% and at 5 years is 71.8%.

Not all older women with osteoporosis develop fractures. There is some evidence that the body partially compensates after menopause by increasing bone strength, which can help offset the risk for fracture. Techniques to measure bone strength may better identify women at higher or lower risk.

Note: Because the standards are based on Caucasian women, they do not necessarily apply to men, children, or to non-Caucasian women. For example, men have a lower risk for fracture at the same standard deviations as women. Researchers are attempting to establish risk guidelines for these groups as well.

Laboratory blood or urine tests for identifying certain markers of bone loss may prove to be useful in certain cases:

High levels of the chemicals deoxypyridinoline and C-telopeptide in the blood may indicate increased risk for hip fracture. These substances are produced when bone is broken down.
A urine test detecting a substance called N-telopeptide may indicate bone loss (although it is not associated with any risk for fracture).

Lifestyle Changes

Because osteoporosis affects such a considerable portion of the female population, total prevention may not be possible, particularly for high-risk groups. Once a woman goes through menopause and more rapid bone depletion occurs, the line between prevention and treatment blurs. Despite their lower risk for osteoporosis, men should also protect their bones with the same healthy lifestyle habits.

Exercise is very important for slowing the progression of osteoporosis. Although mild exercise does not protect bones, moderate exercise (more than 3 days a week for more than a total of 90 minutes a week) reduces the risk for osteoporosis and fracture in both older men and women. Everyone who is in good health should aim for more. Exercise should be regular and life-long. Before beginning any strenuous exercise program, older patients, those at risk or those who have serious medical conditions, should talk to their doctors.

Specific exercises may be better than others, depending on the age group:

Children should begin exercising before adolescence, since bone mass increases during puberty and reaches its peak between ages 20 and 30. Some evidence suggests that exercise may help develop bone mass in teenagers more effectively than high calcium intake. High-intensity exercises may be particularly bone-strengthening in young people. (Such regimes should not be confused with the athlete-triad -- intense competitive exercise, eating disorders, and menstrual irregularities -- that causes osteoporosis in young athletes.)
Weight-bearing exercise applies tension to muscle and bone and, in young people, encourages the body to compensate for the added stress, increasing bone density by as much as 2 - 8% a year. In premenopausal women these exercises are very protective. (Young men need high-intensity exercises to increase bone mass.) Careful weight training is also very beneficial for elderly people, especially women.
Regular brisk long walks improve bone density and mobility and may relieve osteoarthritic pain. High-impact exercises can be very bone-protective in young and middle-aged adults who have no precluding medical or physical conditions. Most older individuals should avoid high-impact aerobic exercises (step aerobics), which increase the risk for osteoporotic fractures. (Older people, particularly women who engage in jumping exercises should do so under supervision.) Although low-impact aerobic exercises such as swimming and bicycling do not increase bone density, they are excellent for cardiovascular fitness and should be part of a regular regimen.
Exercises specifically targeted to strengthen the back help prevent fractures later on in life and can be beneficial in improving posture and reducing kyphosis (hunchback), even in people with existing severe conditions.
Low-impact exercises that improve concentration, balance, and strength, particularly yoga and tai chi, have been found to decrease the risk of falling. In one study, tai chi reduced the risk of falling by almost half.

Exercise plays an important role in the retention of bone density in the aging person. Studies show that exercises requiring muscles to pull on bones cause the bones to retain and possibly gain density.

Click the icon to see an image of osteoporosis.

In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a new health claim for foods and dietary supplements that contain calcium and vitamin D. The FDA’s recommendation will allow manufacturers of these products to state that the combination of calcium and vitamin D can reduce the risk of osteoporosis. Also in 2007, the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) updated its recommendations for getting enough calcium and vitamin D3. The NOF now recommends 1,200 mg of calcium/day and 800 - 1,200 I.U. of vitamin D3/day for adults age 50 and older. (For strong bones, people need enough of both calcium and vitamin D.)

For years, doctors have recommended that women take supplements of calcium plus vitamin D to help maintain bone density and reduce the risk for fractures. Many studies, including a 2007 review in the Lancet, show that a combination of calcium and vitamin D can help prevent osteoporosis. However, a 2006 New England Journal of Medicine study raised some questions about this approach. In the Women’s Health Initiative study, women were randomly assigned to receive either 1,000 mg of calcium carbonate plus 400 IU of vitamin D a day or placebo. The results indicated that daily calcium and vitamin D supplements:

Improve slightly (by 1%) hip bone density
Prevent hip fracture, but only for women who consistently take the supplements. (Another 2006 study supported this finding.)
Do not prevent spine or other types of fractures
Produce a slight increase in the risk of kidney stones

The medical community has differing views on how to interpret these findings. Some doctors recommend that women over age 60 should still consider taking calcium and vitamin D for bone health. Other doctors feel that due to the risks of kidney stones, supplements are beneficial only for women (especially those over age 70) who do not get enough calcium in their diets. Ask your doctor whether or not you should take calcium supplements.

Appropriate Daily Doses. Recommended daily amounts of calcium depend on age and risk factors:

In young people, children ages 3 - 8 should take 800 mg of calcium per day, while children and adolescents ages 9 - 17 need 1,300 mg per day. Teenage girls who do not have enough calcium in their diets should consider taking supplements, which can help build bone density during these critical years.
The standard recommended dose for people over age 50 is about 1,200 mg per day, but actual dosage may be higher or lower depending on risk factors. Even doses of 1,000 mg may help preserve bone in many postmenopausal women without osteoporosis, including during winter months (when bone loss is greatest). In women who have already experienced osteoporosis-related fractures, however, 1,000 mg daily may not add any protective benefits without bone-building medication.
Some experts suggest that all pregnant women, adolescents, and those on corticosteroids take 1,000 - 1,300 mg of calcium every day.
Breast-feeding women should have 2,000 mg per day.

Forms of Calcium Supplements. There are several different kinds of calcium supplements, such as calcium carbonate (Caltrate, Os-Cal, Tums), calcium citrate (Citracal), calcium gluconate, and calcium lactate. Although each kind provides calcium, they all have different calcium concentrations, absorption capabilities, and other actions. Their value in preserving bones depends on many different factors:

Calcium Concentrations. Forty percent of calcium carbonate is actually calcium, whereas calcium citrate is 24% calcium, and calcium gluconate is only 9% calcium.
Calcium Absorption Capabilities. The calcium must also be absorbed from the stomach into the bloodstream. Calcium citrate is better absorbed than many other calcium compounds. It was reported to be the first calcium supplement to preserve bone density after menopause. (Calcium citrate also increases iron absorption. Milk and other calcium compounds tend to reduce iron absorption.) One simple method for testing the absorbency of a particular brand of calcium tablet is to place it in a glass of white vinegar at full strength and check to be sure that it breaks up within 30 minutes. Taking large amounts of antacids can impair calcium absorption. People should take calcium supplements after meals.

Side Effects. Calcium supplements, even at normal doses of about 1,000 mg a day, can increase the risk for kidney stones. People should be careful not to exceed the upper limit of 2,500 mg per day. (Because many commercial foods are now fortified with calcium, this upper limit may be easier to reach than people think.) Calcium may boost the effects of drugs used to treat osteoporosis.

Click the icon to see an image of kidney stones.

Although not a specific side effect of calcium, there has been much public concern about reports of a small amount of lead in calcium supplements. Although exposure to high levels of lead can cause health problems, the amount in such supplements is very small and may pose little or no hazard.

Vitamin D. Vitamin D helps the stomach and the gastrointestinal tract absorb calcium. It also is the essential companion to calcium in maintaining strong bones. Moreover, vitamin D protects against osteoporosis only in combination with calcium.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin D.

Vitamin D is made in the skin using energy from the ultraviolet rays in sunlight. People also can get it from dietary supplements.

As a person ages, vitamin D levels decline. They also fall during winter months and when people have inadequate sunlight. Pollution may also contribute to less sunlight and declining vitamin D levels.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin D.

Most current adult guidelines recommend:

400 IU (10 mcg) for people aged 50 - 60.
600 IU (15 mcg) for those over age 70 who do not have sufficient exposure to sunlight. (Evidence suggests that higher doses of vitamin D -- up to 1,000 IU per day -- may help prevent fractures in people with osteoporosis.)

There are various recommendations for daily vitamin D intake. In 2007, the National Osteoporosis Foundation updated its guidelines to recommend 400 - 800 IU of vitamin D3 for adults younger than age 50, and 800 - 1,000 IU of vitamin D3 for adults age 50 and older. Vitamin D3, also called cholecalciferol, is the form of vitamin D that is best for bone health. In addition to supplements, food sources for vitamin D3 include fortified milk, egg yolks, saltwater fish, and liver.

In 2007, the U.S. National Institute of Health’s Office of Dietary Supplements released a report regarding vitamin D and bone health. Researchers were not able to definitely separate the effect of vitamin D from that of calcium, as most clinical trials evaluate the combination of these supplements. The report did indicate that a combination of daily vitamin D3 (700 - 800 IU) and calcium (500 - 1,200 mg) decreases the risks of falls, fractures, and bone loss in elderly people (ages 62 - 85 years).

Sufficient sunlight exposure and drinking milk fortified with vitamin D supply most people’s normal needs for vitamin D. One cup of whole milk provides about 100 IU of vitamin D.

Vitamin D is toxic in doses above 2,000 IU a day. No one should exceed the recommended daily intake of vitamin D except under the direction of a doctor.

Many people could become deficient in vitamin D as they avoid sunlight to prevent skin cancers and instead increase their intake of milk products, such as yogurt and skim milk, which may have little vitamin D. Such individuals may need to take supplements. People with darker skin have a higher risk for vitamin D deficiency than those with lighter skin.

Vitamin D derivatives are being investigated for treating osteoporosis. Calcitriol (Calcijex, Rocaltrol), for example, is a prescription-form of vitamin D that can increase bone mass and decrease the rate of spinal fractures. However, calcitriol increases the risk for high blood calcium levels (hypercalcemia) and requires frequent monitoring.

Vitamin K. Vitamin K has properties that protect bone and prevent fracture. Because intestinal bacteria produce vitamin K, and the vitamin is found in leafy vegetables, deficiencies are rare. Some evidence suggests, however, that people may not be consuming enough of this nutrient. Vitamin K affects blood clotting, and taking supplements is not recommended without first talking to a doctor. Vitamin K2 (menatetrenone), a form of vitamin K, may help prevent fractures in people with osteoporosis.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of vitamin K.

Click the icon to see an image of the sources of vitamin K.

Vitamin B12. Studies suggest that people need the right amounts of vitamin B12 and folic acid to maintain their bone mineral density.

Vitamin A. High amounts of dietary vitamin A reduce bone density and may even increase the risk for fracture in postmenopausal women. (A form of vitamin A, retinoic acid, has been found to stimulate bone breakdown.)

The DASH Diet and Low Sodium. Perhaps a good general approach for people at risk for osteoporosis (or almost any adult) is the DASH diet plus sodium (salt) restriction. The DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet is used to help people with hypertension maintain healthy blood pressures. A 2003 study also reported that it might help protect bones and improve cholesterol levels. This diet not only is rich in important nutrients and fiber but also includes foods that contain far more potassium, calcium, and magnesium, than are found in the average American diet. All of these minerals are important for bone protection. The dietary recommendations are as follows:

Avoid saturated fat (although include calcium-rich dairy products that are no- or low-fat). When choosing fats, select monounsaturated oils, such as olive or canola oils. These fats are also found in some fish. Although no one wants to be overweight, even a slight excess of fat helps protect bones. In one study, women who ate more fat in their diet were, on average, better able to absorb calcium than were women who had been put on a low-fat, high-fiber diet.
Choose whole grains over white flour or pasta products. Include nuts, seeds, or legumes (dried beans or peas) daily.
Choose fresh fruits and vegetables every day. Many of these foods are rich in potassium, magnesium, and other minerals that are important for bone (as well as heart) protection.
Choose protein preferably from fish, poultry, or soy products. Soy in combination with fiber-rich foods or supplements may have specific benefits. Oily fish may also be particularly beneficial. They contain omega-3 fatty acids, which have been associated with heart and nerve protection.

Salt Restriction. Reducing salt may protect both the heart and the bones. High sodium intake interferes with calcium retention. Note: Fast foods and commercial snacks are usually high in sodium and have been linked with weak bones.

Dairy Products and Calcium-Rich Foods. Although some studies have reported that dairy products benefit the bones, it is not entirely clear if high-calcium diets reduce the risk for fractures compared to adequate intake of vitamin D. Until more is known, people should be sure their diets have sufficient calcium. Dietary calcium is available from many good sources.

Milk and Dairy Products. The best source of calcium in the diet is from milk fortified with vitamin D. Four glasses of milk provide about 1,200 mg of calcium. (Skim milk and yogurt products, unfortunately, are often low in vitamin D, which is important for calcium absorption.) According to a 2003 study, girls who have low milk intake increase their risk for fracture in adulthood. One report even suggests that milk proteins actually slow bone break down. It is not clear, however, if drinking milk after menopause offers any significant bone protection.
Other Calcium-Rich Foods. Other calcium-rich foods include shrimp, canned salmon or sardines, black strap molasses, calcium-fortified tofu, and almonds. A number of commercial foods, including orange juice and some cereals, are now calcium fortified. Dark green vegetables (broccoli, kale, turnip greens) are rich in calcium but little of it is absorbed (kale is best).

Click the icon to see an image of milk and the facial bones.

Mineral-Rich Fruits and Vegetables.

Potassium. Potassium may be very important for strong bones and may help counteract negative effects of high-protein diets. Potassium-rich fruits include bananas, oranges, prunes, and cantaloupes, and vegetables that contain potassium include carrots, spinach, celery, alfalfa, mushrooms, lima beans, potatoes, avocados, and broccoli.
Magnesium. Some studies have observed that low levels of magnesium may contribute to thinning bones. Some studies suggest that magnesium supplements help suppress the cycle that leads to bone loss. Experts recommend 350 mg a day for supplements. However, excessive magnesium may be harmful in people with diabetes or kidney disease. Foods rich in magnesium include dairy products, spinach, potatoes, beets, nuts, sole, and halibut.
Other Minerals. Phosphorous, boron, and zinc have also been associated with bone protection.

Protein. Protein may be important for frail older people for improving muscle strength. Researchers, meanwhile, have associated both low and high protein intake with bone loss. Protein deficiencies appear to trigger hormonal changes that increase bone breakdown. On the other hand, high protein intake increases urinary calcium loss, which can impair bone density in people with low-calcium diets. High-protein diets, however, do not appear to cause bone loss if calcium intake is also high. The bottom line is to eat enough protein but to balance it with plenty of calcium-rich, and other mineral-rich, foods.

The protein source (meat, soy, or fish) may have some effect on bone density, although the effects are not clear. Studies are mixed on whether protein from meat has a positive or negative effect on bone loss. In any case, the best sources of protein for bone protection may be from oily fish or soy.

Choosing protein from fish (especially oily fish such as sardines, salmon, mackerel, fresh tuna, and herring) is a good option. Oily fish are high in vitamin D, which is bone protective. Such fish are also heart protective. Wild salmon has a much higher vitamin D content than farmed salmon. American brands of canned tuna, meanwhile, generally do not contain significant amounts of vitamin D.
Soy may have some modest protection against bone loss. Soy is high in estrogen-like plant chemicals called isoflavones, which may improve bone health in older women. In particular, the isoflavone genistein is being studied for its effects on bone health. A small 2007 study indicated that genistein supplements, when taken with vitamin D and calcium, may help improve bone density in postmenopausal women with thinning bones. (However, other studies indicate that soy has no effect on bone density in healthy premenopausal women.) Soy food products that also contain calcium, such as tofu, may be particularly beneficial. In such cases, 3 ounces of tofu supply 60% of daily calcium requirements.

Alcohol. Alcohol has different effects on bones depending on how much is consumed. One study found that women older than age 65 who drank one to two drinks (1 - 2 oz) of alcohol weekly had higher bone density than non-drinkers. Alcohol in moderate amounts may reduce parathyroid hormone and increase estrogen levels. Excessive drinking, however, has been associated with brittle bones.

Cola, Coffee, Tea and Caffeine. One study suggested that drinking tea regularly may help protect bones. Nevertheless, there has been some concern that caffeine consumption, particularly from coffee, may increase calcium levels in urine and reduce levels in the body. In one trial, consumption of lots of coffee (9 or more cups per day) was associated with an increased risk of hip fractures in women, but not in men. However, not all studies support a risk. Some evidence suggests that caffeine may pose a danger for bone loss only in elderly thin women -- but not in those who have normal or high weight. Drinking carbonated beverages, particularly cola, may increase the risk for bone fractures in people with low bone density.

Everyone who smokes should quit. The risk for osteoporosis from smoking appears to diminish after quitting.

An important component in reducing the risk for fractures is preventing falls. Risk factors for falling include:

Slow walking
Inability to walk in a straight line
Certain medications (such as tranquilizers and sleeping pills)
Low blood pressure when rising in the morning
Poor vision

Recommendations for preventing falls or fractures from falls in elderly people include:

Exercise to maintain strength and balance if there are no conflicting medical conditions. In one study of older people, this was the single best intervention for preventing falls.
Do not use loose rugs on the floors.
Move any obstructions to walking, such as loose cords or very low pieces of furniture, away from traveled areas.
Rooms should be well lit.
Have regular eye checkups.
Try wearing hip pads. Hip pads are specially designed to protect hipbones against falls and are worn under clothing. Evidence on their protection against fractures is weak, however, particularly since compliance is poor. Nevertheless, newer hip pads that are thinner and made with newer materials may be helpful and more appealing.
Wear thinner, hard-soled shoes. Studies indicate these shoes are just as comfortable as the popular resilient-soled footwear, but they may be difficult to find. Soft-soled high-resilient so-called athletic footwear may contribute to impaired balance and dangerous falls, in part, because these cushioned shoes offer less stability.

Medications

Many drugs are available to treat osteoporosis. Unfortunately, studies continue to report that doctors fail to evaluate and adequately treat both men and women for this condition, even after a fracture. According to one study of women over age 60, fewer than 2% were evaluated for osteoporosis or spinal fracture by their doctors. Among those who were diagnosed, only 36% received appropriate medication. Among adults who had sustained fractures, less than 5% of men and fewer than half of women were evaluated and treated according to recommended guidelines, indicated two other studies. In one of the studies, only 24% of women received treatment for osteoporosis after a fracture. In both studies, the older a woman was, the less likely she was to have adequate evaluation or treatment.

Drugs Used to Treat Osteoporosis. Two types of drugs are used to treat osteoporosis:

Antiresorptive Drugs. Antiresorptives include bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy, selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs), and calcitonin. Bisphosphonates are the standard drugs used for osteoporosis. These drugs block resorption (preventing bone break down), which slows the rate of bone remodeling, but they cannot rebuild bone. Because resorption and reformation occur naturally as a continuous process, blocking resorption may eventually also reduce bone formation.
Anabolic, or Bone-Forming, Drugs. Drugs that rebuild bone are known as anabolics. The primary anabolic drug is low-dose parathyroid hormone (PTH), which is administered through injections. This medicine is proving to be very effective in restoring bone and preventing fractions. PTH is still relatively new, and long-term effects are still unknown. Fluoride is another bone-building drug, but it has limitations and is not commonly used.

Both types of drugs are effective in preventing bone loss and fractures, although they vary in their effectiveness and safety.

Bisphosphonates are antiresorptive drugs. They are the primary drugs for preventing and treating osteoporosis. They can help reduce the risk of both spinal and hip fractures, including among patients with prior bone breaks.

Studies indicate that these drugs are effective and safe for at least 10 years. Eventually, however, bone loss continues with bisphosphonates. This may be due to the fact that bone breakdown is one of two phases in a continuous process of rebuilding bone. Over time, just blocking resorption will interrupt this process and impair the second half of the process -- bone formation. Some researchers think that this problem may be overcome by building bone for a couple of years with parathyroid hormone (PTH), then following this treatment with bisphosphonates to prevent the breakdown of bone. (Administering the two drugs simultaneously is not effective because bisphosphonates interfere with the way PTH works.)

A 2006 study of the bisphosphonate alendronate (Fosamax), the most widely used osteoporosis drug, indicated that women at low risk for fracture may be able to stop using the drug after 5 years without increasing their fracture risk for another 5 years. However, the Journal of the American Medical Association study also suggested that it is safer for women at high risk for spine fractures to keep taking alendronate on a continuous basis.

Candidates. National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines recommend that the following people should take or consider bisphosphonates:

Women with a below-normal bone density of 2.5 standard deviation or greater and no history of fractures
Women with below-normal bone density 1 standard deviation or more and a history of fractures

Brands. Bisphosphonates are available in different forms:

Oral bisphosphonates. These pills include alendronate (Fosamax), risedronate (Actonel), and ibandronate (Boniva). Alendronate and risedronate are taken once a week. In 2005, ibandronate was approved as the first once-monthly pill. Risedronate is also available in a pill that contains calcium. Risedronate and alendronate are approved for both men and women.
Injectable bisphosphonates. In 2007, zoledronic acid (Reclast) was approved as the first once-yearly injection treatment for osteoporosis. The injectable form of ibandronate (Boniva), approved in 2006, requires injections 4 times a year. Injectable bisphosphonates are an alternative for patients who may have difficulty swallowing pills or sitting upright after oral bisphosphonate treatment.

Side Effects. The most distressing side effects of bisphosphonates are gastrointestinal problems, particularly stomach cramps and heartburn. These symptoms are very common and occur in nearly half of all patients. Other side effects may include irritation of the esophagus (the tube that connects the mouth to the stomach) and ulcers in the esophagus or stomach. Some patients may experience muscle and joint pain. To avoid stomach problems, doctors recommend:

Take the pill on an empty stomach in the morning with 6 - 8 ounces of water (not juice or carbonated or mineral water).
After taking the pill, remain in an upright position. Do not eat or drink for at least 30 - 60 minutes. (Check your drug’s dosing instructions for exact time.)
If you develop chest pain, heartburn, or difficulty swallowing, stop taking the drug and see your doctor.

Osteonecrosis (bone death) of the jaw is a rare side effect that has occurred mainly in patients who received intravenous bisphosphonates for cancer treatment (not osteoporosis). Many of these patients had major dental procedures before developing osteonecrosis. However, this bone decay condition has also been reported in some patients who have taken bisphosphonates by mouth (mainly alendronate). Symptoms may include jaw pain or swelling, gum infections, and poor healing of the gums. Talk to your doctor or dentist if you experience any jaw or gum discomfort while taking a bisphosphonate drug.

Raloxifene (Evista) belongs to a class of drugs called selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs). These drugs are similar, but not identical, to estrogen. Raloxifene provides the bone benefits of estrogen without increasing the risks for estrogen-related breast and uterine cancers. Raloxifene was approved in 1997 to prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, and in 1999 for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration approved raloxifene for prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, as well as postmenopausal women at high risk for invasive breast cancer.

While there are many SERM drugs, raloxifene is the only one approved for both treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Only postmenopausal women who have or are at risk for osteoporosis should take this drug. Studies indicate that raloxifene can stop the thinning of bone and help build better quality and stronger bone.

A thrombus is a blood clot that forms in a vessel and remains there. An embolism is a clot that travels from the site where it formed to another location in the body. Thrombi or emboli can lodge in a blood vessel and block the flow of blood in that location, depriving tissues of normal blood flow and oxygen. This can result in damage, destruction (infarction), or even death of the tissues (necrosis) in that area.

Side Effects. Raloxifene increases the risk for blood clots in the veins. Because of this side effect, raloxifene also increases the risk for stroke (but not other types of heart disease). These side effects, though rare, are very serious. Women should not take this drug if they have a history of blood clots, or if they have certain risk factors for stroke and heart disease. More common mild side effects include hot flashes and leg cramps.

Produced by the thyroid gland, natural calcitonin regulates calcium levels by inhibiting the osteoclastic activity, the breakdown of bone. The drug version is derived from salmon and is available as a nasal spray (Miacalcin) and an injected form (Calcimar). Calcitonin is not used to prevent osteoporosis. It treats osteoporosis. It may be effective for spinal protection (but not hip) in both men and women. Calcitonin may be an alternative for patients who cannot take a bisphosphonate or SERM. It also appears to help relieve bone pain associated with established osteoporosis and fracture.

Side Effects. Side effects include headache, dizziness, anorexia, diarrhea, skin rashes, and edema (swelling). The most common adverse effect experienced with the injection is nausea, with or without vomiting. This occurs less often with the nasal spray. The nasal spray may cause nosebleeds, sinusitis, and inflammation of the membranes in the nose. Also, many people who take calcitonin develop resistance or allergic reactions after long-term use.

Although high persistent levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) can cause osteoporosis, daily injections of low and intermittent doses of this hormone actually stimulate bone production and increase bone mineral density. In clinical studies, teriparatide (Forteo), a drug made from selected amino acids found in parathyroid hormone, reduced the risk for spinal and non-spinal fractures by 50 - 65%. It may prove to be a very useful drug for men with osteoporosis. Unlike most treatments for osteoporosis, including bisphosphonates, the benefits may persist even after the injections have been stopped.

Although the treatment requires injections, researchers are investigating a nasal spray version of PTH. In addition to easing patient discomfort, there is some preliminary evidence that nasal-administered PTH may be better absorbed than injections. Side effects of PTH are generally mild and include nausea, dizziness, and leg cramps. No significant complications have been reported to date.

Early animal studies did report bone tumors in mice that were given parathyroid long-term. Such effects have not been observed in humans to date. However, people with Paget disease, (a disorder in which bone thickens but also, oddly, weakens), should not take parathyroid hormone, since they are at higher than normal risk for bone tumors.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is sometimes used to prevent osteoporosis. A Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study found that women who received estrogen, or estrogen plus progestin, therapy had fewer fractures than women who received placebo.

However, WHI studies have also shown that estrogen increases the risk for breast cancer, blood clots, strokes, and heart attacks. For this reason, women need to balance the benefits that HRT has on bone-loss protection, with the risks it carries for other serious health conditions. The Food and Drug Administration recommends that women first try other medications for prevention of osteoporosis.

HRT is available in many different forms, including pills and skin patches. [See In-Depth Report #40: Menopause.]

New SERMs. Bazedoxifene (Viviant) is a new selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that is in phase III clinical trials. In research presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR), bazedoxifene reduced new cases of non-spine fracture by 52% compared to placebo.
Biologic Drugs. Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody injectable drug currently in phase III studies. It targets the RANK ligand, a protein involved with cells that break down bone (osteoclasts). Results presented at the 2007 ASBMR meeting indicated that denosumab may help increase bone mineral density by as much as 10.6%. Odanacatib is another biologic drug showing promise in phase IIB trials. Odanacatib inhibits cathepsin K, a protein that also plays a role in osteoclast activity.
Strontium. Strontium, a chemical element found in bone, may help increase bone formation and decrease bone resorption. NB S101 is a strontium drug currently in phase II trials.

Treatment

Nonsurgical treatments for fractures include braces, plaster cases, and manipulation of the fracture. Such approaches have not been well studied to determine an optimal method, and patients should discuss all options with their doctors.

Reconstructive surgery is usually used for hip fractures and should be performed within 48 hours, assuming the patient has no other complicating medical conditions. After surgery, the patient should be mobilized within the first day. In one study, protein supplements helped people with hip fractures recover more quickly and reduced bone loss.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are surgical procedures used to lessen pain. Research to date suggests that they are safe and provide pain relief for many patients. In some cases they may increase height. There have been few controlled trials, however, and more research is needed to determine long-term effects.

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. Percutaneous vertebroplasty involves the injection of a cement-like bone substitute into damaged vertebrae. It is proving useful for stabilizing the spine and relieving pain in patients with spinal compression fractures due to osteoporosis or cancer. Success rates of over 90% have been reported. Serious complications occur in fewer than 1% of cases.

Kyphoplasty. Kyphoplasty is a variant of percutaneous vertebroplasty that may help prevent kyphosis (hunchback) in patients whose spines have collapsed. The procedure inserts a balloon into the fractured vertebrae. As the balloon inflates, the spine is moved upward, to its original location. The balloon is then removed, and the bone and the core of the newly-erect vertebrae are filled with cement. In one 2003 study, short-term symptom relief improved by 70% and was immediate. Long-term effectiveness is not yet known.

Resources

www.nof.org -- National Osteoporosis Foundation
www.niams.nih.gov/Health_Info/Bone -- National Institutes of Health, Osteoporosis and Related Bone Diseases
www.menopause.org -- North American Menopause Society
www.asbmr.org -- American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
www.niams.nih.gov -- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Effectiveness and Safety of Vitamin D in Relation to Bone Health, Structured Abstract. August 2007. Rockville, MD.

Bilezikian JP. Osteonecrosis of the jaw -- do bisphosphonates pose a risk? N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 30;355(22):2278-81.

Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, et al. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 3;356(18):1809-22.

Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, et al. Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Dec 27;296(24):2927-38.

Diem SJ, Blackwell TL, Stone KL, Yaffe K, Haney EM, Bliziotes MM, et al. Use of antidepressants and rates of hip bone loss in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 25;167(12):1240-5.

Haney EM, Chan BK, Diem SJ, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Association of low bone mineral density with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use by older men. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 25;167(12):1246-51.

Marini H, Minutoli L, Polito F, Bitto A, Altavilla D, Atteritano M, et al. Effects of the phytoestrogen genistein on bone metabolism in osteopenic postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):839-47.

Tang BM, Eslick GD, Nowson C, Smith C, Bensoussan A. Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007 Aug 25;370(9588):657-66.

Yang YX, Lewis JD, Epstein S, Metz DC. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and risk of hip fracture. JAMA. 2006 Dec 27;296(24):2947-53.

Review Date:
11/1/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Lactobacillus acidophilus

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:25 -0700

Overview

Overview
Uses
Dietary Sources
Available Forms
How to Take It
Precautions
Possible Interactions
Supporting Research

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Overview

Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) is the most commonly used probiotic, or "friendly," bacteria. Such healthy bacteria inhabit the intestines and vagina and protect against the entrance and growth of "bad" organisms that can cause disease. This is accomplished through a variety of mechanisms. For example, the breakdown of food by L. acidophilus leads to production of lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and other byproducts that make the environment hostile for undesired organisms. L. acidophilus also produces lactase, the enzyme that breaks down milk sugar (lactose) into simple sugars. People who are lactose intolerant do not produce this enzyme. Symptoms such as gas, bloating, and discomfort develop. For this reason, L. acidophilus supplements may be beneficial for these individuals.

Other potential probiotics include a variety of Lactobacillus species (spp.), such as the caseiGG, rhamnosus, NCFM, DDS-1, and johnsonii strains, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, Enterococcus faecium, Saccharaomyces boulardii, Bacillus spp., and Escherichia coli.

Prebiotics refers to the soluble fiber component found in certain foods or supplements that stimulate the growth of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract. Examples include fructooligosaccharides (FOS).

Uses

Probiotics offer a variety of potential therapeutic uses. These include the following:

Vaginal infections

Several clinical studies support the use of Lactobacillus acidophilus vaginal suppositories in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and candida (yeast) infections. A small number of clinical studies suggest that eating yogurt enriched with Lactobacillus acidophilus may be beneficial. Additional clinical research is needed.

Diarrhea prevention

Some clinical research exists that suggests Lactobacillus acidophilus may be effective when used to prevent diarrhea in travelers or in people taking antibiotics, although there are also some negative studies. Several probiotics (Saccharomyces boulardii and a mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum) had significant efficacy on treating traveler's diarrhea. No serious adverse reactions were reported in 12 clinical trials for this condition. Additional human studies are needed in these areas.

Other uses

Other uses of Lactobacillus acidophilus includes:

Replacing the "friendly" intestinal bacteria destroyed by antibiotics.
Aiding digestion and suppressing disease-causing bacteria.
Used in the treatment of chronic constipation.
Treating overgrowth of "bad" organisms in the gastrointestinal tract (a condition that tends to cause diarrhea and may occur from use of antibiotics).
Alleviating symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and, possibly, inflammatory bowel disease (such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis).
Preventing or reducing the recurrence of urinary tract infections, and cystitis (bladder inflammation).
Improving lactose absorption digestion in people who are lactose intolerant.
Enhancing the immune response. Studies have suggested that consumption of yogurt or milk that contains specific strains of Lactobacillus or supplements with Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium may improve the natural immune response. Further research is needed to confirm these early findings and to best understand how the improved immune function may or may not help in warding off infections.
Aiding the treatment of respiratory infections such as sinusitis, bronchitis, and pneumonia. More research is needed in this area.
Lowering risk of allergies. Examples include asthma, hay fever, food allergies to milk, and skin reactions such as eczema.
Helping to treat high cholesterol.
Reducing the risk of recurring bladder tumors once this cancer has been treated.
Other conditions under investigation for use of probiotics include colon cancer, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) related diarrhea, and Helicobacter pylori (an organism that can lead to development of ulcers).

Dietary Sources

The primary dietary sources of L. acidophilus include milk enriched with acidophilus, yogurt containing live L. acidophilus cultures, miso, and tempeh.

Prebiotics are found in breast milk, onions, tomatoes, bananas, honey, barley, garlic, and wheat.

Available Forms

L. acidophilus preparations consist of dried or liquid cultures of living bacteria. These cultures are usually grown in milk but can sometimes be grown in milk-free cultures. L. acidophilus is available in the following forms:

Freeze-dried granules
Freeze-dried powders
Freeze-dried capsules
Liquid L. acidophilus preparations
Yogurt enhanced with probiotics

L. acidophilus supplements should be refrigerated for best quality. However some preparations are in a spore form which is resistant to breakdown under normal temperatures and are often used by travelers who do not have access to refrigeration who use probiotics supplements to help prevent intestinal infections. Check the package label for storage instructions.

Prebiotics occur naturally in foods, but supplements provide a more concentrated source of this substance. Prebiotics are oligosacchrides, chains of sugar units linked together. Inulin is a long-chain oligosacchride (from 2 - 60 sugars) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS) are short-chain oligosaccharides (from 2 - 7 sugars). It is not clear at this time which type of prebiotic is most effective, although fructoligosaccarhides (FOS) are the most commonly used.

How to Take It

Pediatric

Newborns and Infants (0 - 1 year): Liquid preparations may be used as a lotion and applied topically to diaper area for yeast infections and diaper rashes. If the child is on antibiotic therapy, ¼ tsp or ¼ capsule can be taken orally, 2 hours after each dose of antibiotics to replace beneficial bacteria. Use products specifically formulated for infants. Always check with your pediatrician before giving dietary supplements to an infant or child.

Add ¼ tsp or ¼ capsule to water for the treatment of oral infections.

Adult

Recommended doses of L. acidophilus vary depending on the health condition being treated. Check the specific dosage recommendations on the product label. The following list provides guidelines for the most common uses:

For prevention or treatment of diarrhea: Take 1 -2 billion viable cells per day, called colony-forming-units or CFUs. Some health care providers may recommend up to 10 - 15 billion cells per day).

For vaginal infections: Take 8 ounces of yogurt (with live active cultures containing one of the Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium strains listed above) daily or an oral daily supplement containing at least 1 - 2 billion live organisms. Clinical experience also suggests that placing yogurt with live acidophilus cultures directly to the vaginal area, using a disposable spatula and wearing a sanitary pad, helps to relieve itching and inflammation. Similarly, lactobacillus capsules or tablets may be inserted directly into the vagina.

For cystitis: Use 1 - 2 capsules or tablets inserted into the vagina nightly for 2 weeks.

For maintaining normal intestinal flora: Take 1 - 15 billion viable cells daily. If using for prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea, start taking the probiotic supplement after conclusion of the antibiotic treatment.

If diarrhea occurs with the dosage you are taking, decrease the dosage or stop taking the product and talk with your health care provider.

Precautions

Because of the potential for side effects and interactions with medications, dietary supplements should be taken only under the supervision of a knowledgeable health care provider.

Mild gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea may occur in some individuals (not on antibiotic therapy) who take more than 1 - 2 billion L. acidophilus cells daily.

There has been one report of anaphylaxis (a serious allergic reaction accompanied by shortness of breath and loss of consciousness) in a person taking inulin, a type of prebiotic.

Possible Interactions

If you are currently being treated with any of the following medications, you should not use Lactobacillus or other probiotics without first talking to your health care provider.

Sulfasalazine -- A laboratory study suggests that L. acidophilus speeds up metabolism of sulfasalazine, a medication used to treat ulcerative colitis. The significance of this information is unknown.

Supporting Research

Alvarez-Olmos MI. Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modern perspective on a traditional therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(11):1567-1576.

Cunningham-Rundles S, Ahrne S, Bengmark S, et al. Probiotics and immune response. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(1 Suppl):S22-25.

de Roos NM, Katan MB. Effects of probiotic bacteria on diarrhea, lipid metabolism, and carcinogenesis: a review of papers published between 1988 and 1998. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(2):405-411.

de Vrese M, Marteau PR. Probiotics and prebiotics: effects on diarrhea. J Nutr. 2007;137(3 Suppl 2):803S-11S.

Donnet-Hughes A, et al. Modulation of nonspecific mechanisms of defense by lactic acid bacteria: effective dose. J Dairy Sci. May 1999; 82(5):863-869.

Elmer GW, Surawicz CM, McFarland LV. Biotherapeutic agents. A neglected modality for the treatment and prevention of selected intestinal and vaginal infections. [Review]. JAMA. 1996;275(11):870-876.

Ewaschuk JB, Dieleman LA. Probiotics and prebiotics in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(37):5941-50.

Favier C, Neut C, Mizon C, Cortot A, Colombel JF, Mizon J. Fecal ß-D-galactosidase production and Bifidobacteria are decreased in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42(4):817-822.

Fedorak RN, Madsen KL. Probiotics and the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10(3):286-299.

Friedrich MJ. A bit of culture for children: probiotics may improve health and fight disease. JAMA. 2000;284(11):1365-1366.

Gill HS, Rutherford KJ, Cross ML. Dietary probiotic supplementation enhances natural killer cell activity in the elderly: an investigation of age-related immunological changes. J Clin Immunol. 2001;21(4):264-271.

Gill HS, Rutherford KJ, Cross ML, Gopal PK. Enhancement of immunity in the elderly by dietary supplementation with the probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis HN019. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(6):833-839.

Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Campieri M. Probiotics in infective diarrhea and inflammatory bowel diseases [Review]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:489-493.

Gismondo MR, Drago L, Lombardi A. Review of probiotics available to modify gastrointestinal flora. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999;4:287-292.

Gorbach SL. Probiotics in the third millennium. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34 Suppl 2:S2-S7.

Hatakka K, Savilahti, Ponka A, et al. Effect of long term consumption of probiotic milk on infections in children attending day care centers: double-blind, randomized trial. BMJ. 2001;322(7298):1327.

Hilton E, Isenberg HD, Alperstein P, France K, Borenstein MT. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus as prophylaxis for candidal vaginitis. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116(5): 353-357.

Hilton E, Kolakowski P, Singer C, Smith M. Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG as a diarrheal preventive in travelers. J Travel Med. 1997;4(1):41-43.

Hove H, Norgaard H, Mortensen PB. Lactic acid bacteria and the human gastrointestinal tract [Review]. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53(5):339-350.

Ishida Y, Nakamura F, Kanzato H, et al. Effect of milk fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus strain L-92 on symptoms of Japanese cedar pollen allergy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005;69(9):1652-60.

Jang T, Saviano DA. In vitro fermentation by human colonic bacteria is modified by Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation. J Nutr. 1997;127(:1489-1495.

Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357(9262):1076-1079.

Kontiokari T, Sundqvist K, Nuutinen M, Pokka T, Koskela M, Uhari M. Randomised trial of cranberry-lingonberry juice and Lactobacillus GG drink for the prevention of urinary tract infections in women. BMJ. 2001;322:1571-1573.

McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrhea. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007;5(2):97-105.

Malin M, Suomalainen H, Saxelin M, Isolauri E. Promotion of IgA immune response in patients with Crohn's disease by oral bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus GG. Ann Nutr Metab. 1996;40:137-145.

Marteau PR, de Vrese M, Cellier CJ, Schrezenmeir J. Protection from gastrointestinal diseases with the use of probiotics. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(2 Suppl):430S-436S.

Meydani SN, Ha WK. Immunologic effects of yogurt. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(4):861-872.

Michetti P, Dorta G, Wiesel PH, et al. Effect of whey-based culture supernatant of Lactobacillus acidophilus (johnsonii) La1 on Helicobacter pylori infection in humans. Digestion. 1999;60(3):203-209.

Pradhan A, Majumdar MK. Metabolism of some drugs by intestinal lactobacilli and their toxicological considerations. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1986;58(1):11-15.

Rani B, Khetarpaul N. Probiotic fermented food mixtures: possible applications in clinical anti-diarrhea usage. Nutr Health. 1998; 12(2): 97-105.

Reid G. Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital tract against infection. [Review]. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(2 Suppl):437S-443S.

Rembacken BJ, Snelling AM, Hawkey PM, Chlamers DM, Axon ATR. Non-pathogenic Eschericia coli versus mesalazine for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;354:635-639.

Rolfe RD. The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. J Nutr. 2000;130(2S Suppl):396S-402S.

Sazawal S, Hiremath G, Dhingra U, Malik P, Deb S, Black RE. Efficacy of probiotics in prevention of acute diarrhoea: a meta-analysis of masked, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(6):374-82.

Scarpignato C, Rampal P. Prevention and treatment of traveler's diarrhea: a clinical pharmacological approach. [Review]. Chemotherapy. 1995;41 Suppl 1:48-81.

Schiffrin EJ, Brassart D, Servin AL, Rochat F, Donnet-Hughes A. Immune modulation of blood leukocytes in humans by lactic acid bacteria: criteria for strain selection. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66(2):515S-520S.

Shalev E, Battino S, Weiner E, Colodner R, Keness Y. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus compared with pasteurized yogurt as prophylaxis for recurrent candidal vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis. Arch Fam Med. 1996;5(10):593-596.

Shanahan F. Probiotics and inflammatory bowel disease: is there a scientific rationale? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2000;6(2):107-115.

Sheih YH. Systemic immunity-enhancing effects in health subjects following dietary consumption of the lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20(2):149-156.

Szajewska H, Kotowska M, Mrukowicz JZ, Armanska M, Mikolajczyk W. Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in prevention of nosocomial diarrhea in infants. J Pediatr. 2001;138(3):361-365.

Szajewska H, Mrukowicz JZ. Probiotics in the treatment and prevention of acute infectious diarrhea in infants and children: a systematic review of published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;33 Suppl 2;S17-S25.

Tejada-Simon MV, Lee JH, Ustunol Z, Pestka JJ. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium to potentiate immunoglobulin A responses to cholera toxin in mice. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82(4):649-660.

Van Niel CW, Feudtner C, Garrison M, Christakis DA. Lactobacillus thearpy for acute infections diarrhea in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2002;109(4):678-684.

Vanderhoof JA, Whitney DB, Antonson DL, Hanner TL, Lupo JV, Young RJ. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. J Pediatr. 1999;135(5):564-568.

Review Date:
6/7/2007
Reviewed By:
Ernest B. Hawkins, MS, BSPharm, RPh, Health Education Resources; and Steven D. Ehrlich, N.M.D., private practice specializing in complementary and alternative medicine, Phoenix, AZ. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Kidney stones

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:35 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Risk Factors
Symptoms
Diagnosis
Treatment
Medications
Other Treatments
Complications
Prevention
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

New Research:

Patients who have the most common type of gastric bypass surgery, the Roux-en-Y, are at increased risk for kidney stones, beginning 6 months after surgery, according to a study published in 2006.

Causes of Kidney Stones:

Calcium stones form when there is an imbalance in the urine substances that promote and block the formation of stones. Often, the cause of this imbalance is unknown.
Having acidic urine or too much uric acid in the body leads to the formation of uric acid stones.
Struvite stones are almost always caused by urinary tract infections due to bacteria that produce certain enzymes.
Other stones, including cystine and xanthine stones, are usually due to genetic abnormalities.

Treatments:

In about 85% of patients, the kidney stones are small enough that they pass through normal urination, usually within 2 - 3 days.
Certain medications can prevent recurrence of stones in people who are at high risk.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a technique that uses sound waves (ultrasound) to break up simple stones in the kidney or upper urinary tract. The shock waves are delivered from outside the body.
Surgery may be necessary if the stone or stones are too big to pass, and cannot be broken down through ESWL.
A change of diet and increased drinking of fluids, especially water, will help prevent a recurrence.

Introduction

Kidney stones are hard, solid rocks that form in the urinary tract. In many cases, the stones are very small and can pass out of the body without any problems. However, if a stone (even a small one) blocks the flow of urine, excruciating pain may result, and prompt medical treatment may be needed.

The process of urination begins in the kidneys. The kidneys filter out fluids and waste from the body, producing urine. The two kidneys are located deep behind the abdominal organs, below the ribs and toward the middle of the back.

Each kidney contains over a million nephrons. These are the tiny filtration units of the kidney.
Each nephron is composed of a tiny group of blood vessels (a glomerulus) enclosed in a funnel-like structure called Bowman's capsule.
Each glomerulus filters waste products, water, and salts out of the liquid part of the blood (plasma) that has entered the kidney.
About 1% of the plasma is converted into urine. The rest returns into the blood to prevent dehydration. Urine is primarily made of acids, urea, and creatinine (nitrogen compounds).
Urine passes from Bowman's capsule into tiny tubules, which lead to large collecting tubes in the center of the kidney. As the urine passes through this network, it becomes more concentrated.
Urine then flows from the kidney through thin tubes called ureters into the bladder.
The bladder's stretchy walls expand to store the incoming urine until it leaves the body through a tube called the urethra.

The kidneys are responsible for removing wastes from the body, regulating electrolyte balance and blood pressure, and stimulating red blood cell production.

Click the icon to see an image of the urinary tract.

Occasionally, various salts build up on the inside surfaces of the kidney and form crystals. Eventually these crystals become large enough to form stones in the kidney, a condition called nephrolithiasis. Kidney stones (renal calculi) may also form in the ureter or the bladder. Combinations of minerals and other chemicals, some derived from a person's diet, make up the salts in these stones.

Click the icon to see an image of the kidney stones.

Calcium Stones. About 70 - 90% of all kidney stones are made of calcium, usually combined with oxalate, or oxalic acid. A number of common vegetables, fruits, and grains contain oxalate.

About 6% of calcium stones are made of calcium phosphate (called brushite).

Uric Acid Stones. Uric acid is responsible for close to 10% of kidney stones. It is the breakdown product of purines, nitrogen compounds found in our bodies and in certain foods. The breakdown of purines to uric acid occurs in the liver, and from there uric acid enters the bloodstream, most of it passing into the kidneys. From the kidneys, uric acid leaves the body in the urine. Often, uric acid stones occur with calcium stones.

Struvite Stones. Struvite stones are made of magnesium ammonium phosphate. They are almost always associated with certain urinary tract infections. Worldwide, they make up to 30% of all kidney stones. In the United States, however, less than 15% of all stones are struvite. Most struvite stones occur in women. The rate of these stones may be declining in America, perhaps because of better control of urinary tract infections.

Cystine Stones. A build-up of the amino acid cystine, a building block of protein, causes 1% of kidney stones in adults and up to 8% of stones in children. The tendency to form these stones is inherited. Cystine stones are marked by rapid growth and recurrence, which, if not treated promptly, can eventually lead to kidney failure.

Xanthine Stones. Other kidney stones are composed of xanthine, a nitrogen compound. These stones are extremely uncommon and usually occur as a result of a rare genetic disorder.

Click the icon to see an animation about kidney stones.

Causes

The key process in the development of kidney stones is supersaturation.

The urine carries salts, including calcium oxalate, uric acid, cystine, or xanthine.
These salts can become extremely concentrated if there is not enough urine, or if unusually high amounts of crystal-forming salts are present.
When salt concentration levels reach the point at which they no longer dissolve, these salts form crystals.

Different factors may be involved in either reducing urine amount, or increasing the levels of the salts.

Deficiencies in Protective Factors. Normally, urine contains substances that may protect against stone formation, including:

Magnesium
Citrate
Pyrophosphate
Enzymes

These substances:

Allow salt in the urine to be at higher-than-normal concentrations without forming crystals
Prevent crystal formation
Coat the crystals and prevent them from sticking to the surface of kidney tubes

Not having enough of these protective substances can cause stones.

Changes in the Acidity of the Urine. Changes in the acid balance of the urine can affect stone formation.

Uric acid and cystine stones mainly form in acidic urine.
Calcium phosphate and struvite stones increase in alkaline urine.

Factors that Bind Crystals to the Kidney Tubules. Researchers are studying the cells lining the kidney tubules in order to understand how and why early crystals bind to the tubes long enough to form stones. Under investigation are elevated levels of substances that either cause crystals to stick to the tubes or deficiencies in those that prevent them from sticking.

In general, calcium stones form when there is an imbalance in the urine substances that promote and block the formation of stones. Often, the cause of calcium stones is not known, and the condition is then called idiopathic nephrolithiasis. Research suggests that nearly all stones result from problems in the breakdown and absorption of calcium and oxalate. Genetic factors may play a role in about half of these cases. A number of medical conditions and drugs can also affect digestion and intestinal absorption.

Excess Calcium in the Urine (Hypercalciuria). Hypercalciuria (too much calcium in the urine) is responsible for as much as 70% of calcium-containing stones. A number of conditions may produce hypercalciuria. Many are due to genetic factors, but most cases are idiopathic (due to unknown causes).

The following can lead to hypercalciuria and calcium stones:

Too much calcium absorption in the intestines: In most of these conditions, genetic factors lead to increased calcium absorption in the intestine. Researchers are investigating a possible defective gene that regulates calcitriol, a form of vitamin D, which, in excess levels, may increase intestinal absorption of calcium.
Excessive chloride: Chloride has a negative charge, and calcium has a positive one, so they balance each other in the body. Excess chloride may lead to excess calcium. A gene known as CLCN5, which regulates chloride in the urine, is defective in many patients with calcium stones.
Renal calcium leak: In this condition, the filtering processes in the kidney fail, causing an increase of calcium in the urine.
Excessive sodium: High urinary levels of sodium result in increased levels of calcium. Certain defects in the kidney tubules transport system, which cause imbalances in sodium and phosphate, can lead to high calcium levels in the urine. A diet high in salt can also produce this effect.

Excess Oxalate in the Urine (Hyperoxaluria). Oxalate is the most common stone-forming compound. Excessive oxalate in the urine (hyperoxaluria) is responsible for up to 60% of calcium stones and is a more common cause of stones than too much calcium in the urine.

Hyperoxaluria can be either primary or secondary.

Primary hyperoxaluria is an inherited disorder in which too much oxalate in the urine is the main problem.
Secondary hyperoxaluria results from specific conditions that cause high levels of urinary oxalate.

Secondary hyperoxaluria is usually caused by too much dietary oxalates (found in a number of common vegetables, fruits, and grains) or by problems in the body's breakdown of oxalates. Such defects may be due to various factors:

Severe vitamin B6 deficiencies (usually due to genetic disorders)
Deficiencies in Oxalobacter formigene, an intestinal bacteria that breaks down oxalate
Short bowel syndrome, a condition that makes the intestines unable to properly absorb fat and nutrients; calcium may bind to unabsorbed fat instead of oxalates, which causes a buildup of oxalate
Androgens (male hormones)

Female hormones (estrogens) actually lower the risk of hyperoxaluria. Estrogen may help prevent the formation of calcium oxalate stones by keeping urine alkaline, and raising protective citrate levels.

A study published in 2006 found that patients who undergo the most common gastric type of bypass surgery, the Roux-en-Y, were at increased risk for calcium oxalate kidney stones, beginning 6 months after surgery. The study found that patients who underwent the procedure developed hyperoxaluria, and the condition was common 12 months after surgery. The authors also noted an increased number of kidney stone incidents in this patient group.

Excessive Calcium in the Bloodstream (Hypercalcemia). Hypercalcemia generally occurs when bones break down and release too much calcium into the bloodstream. This is a process called resorption. It can occur from a number of different diseases and events:

Hyperparathyroidism: Overactive parathyroid glands cause about 5% of calcium stones. People with this disorder have at least a 20% chance of developing kidney stones. Women are more likely to have this disorder than men.
Immobilization: Lack of movement can lead to kidney stones.
Renal tubular acidosis: This disorder causes acidic and alkaline imbalance. Renal tubular acidosis not only increases calcium levels in the bloodstream but also reduces protective citrate levels.

Hyperuricosuria is a condition of high levels of uric acid in urine. It occurs in between 15 - 20% of people (mostly men) with calcium oxalate stones. Urate, the salt formed from uric acid, creates the center of a crystal (nidus), around which calcium oxalate crystals form and grow. Such stones tend to be severe and recurrent. They appear to be strongly related to a high intake of protein. (Hyperuricosuria also plays a major role in some uric acid stones.)

Low Urine Levels of Citrate (Hypocitraturia). Citrate is the main substance in the body that is responsible for removing excess calcium. It also blocks the process that turns calcium crystals into stones. Low levels of citrate in the urine (hypocitraturia) is a significant risk factor for calcium stones. In addition, hypocitraturia also increases the risk for uric acid stones. This condition most likely contributes to about a third of all kidney stones.

Many conditions can reduce citrate levels. Some causes include:

Renal tubular acidosis
Potassium or magnesium deficiency
Urinary tract infection
Kidney failure
Chronic diarrhea

Often, however, the cause of hypocitraturia-related stones is unknown.

Low Levels of Other Stone-Blocking Compounds. Several other compounds in the urine, including magnesium and pyrophosphate, also prevent the formation of calcium stones. If any of these compounds are lacking, stones may develop.

Nanobacteria Infection. Nanobacteria are tiny infectious organisms that can pass from the blood into urine. They coat themselves with mineral deposits that resemble the composition of kidney stones. Cells infected with these bacteria develop mineral deposits on the inside and outside. Researchers believe that nanobacteria may form the cores of the kidney stones in many people.

Human body tissues, certain foods, and certain alcoholic drinks contain substances called purines. Purine-containing foods include dried beans, peas, and liver. When the body breaks down purines, it produces uric acid. The presence of a certain level of uric acid in the body is normal.

The following conditions are usually seen in patients with uric acid stones:

Too much acid in the urine for a long period (the most important cause of uric acid stones)
Lower than normal amounts of urine produced.
Hyperuricosuria, a metabolic disorder that leads to high levels of uric acid in the urine

Note: Hyperuricosuria can also trigger calcium stones. Therefore, a combination of calcium and uric acid stones may be present in patients with hyperuricosuria.

A number of conditions and other factors may contribute to, or cause, uric acid stones:

Gout: Uric acid and other kidney stones develop in up to 25% of patients with primary gout, a painful form of arthritis that occurs when uric acid in the blood forms crystals in one or more joints.
Diabetes: New research has shown that people with type 2 diabetes have highly acidic urine that can lead to kidney stones, particularly uric acid stones. The findings were published in the May 2006 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
Insulin resistance: People with insulin resistance are at an increased risk for uric acid stones. The reason is unknown but may be related to the transport of certain salts through the kidneys. This transport changes in patients with insulin resistance.
Kidney abnormalities: Kidney problems that reduce the production of ammonia, particularly in people with diabetes or insulin resistance, may lead to uric acid stones.
Genetic factors: Genetic factors can increase a person's risk for uric acid stones.
Hypocitraturia: Hypocitraturia is a low amount of citrate in the urine.
Diet: Eating too much animal protein increases the risk of forming uric acid stones.

Other risk factors include:

Certain medications (chemotherapy drugs, diuretics, and salicylates)
Binge drinking
Not eating for long periods of time (fasting)
Lead poisoning
Blood cancers (leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphomas)
Some rare types of anemia (low levels of red blood cells in the blood)
Chronic diarrhea

Struvite stones are almost always caused by urinary tract infections due to bacteria that produce certain enzymes. These enzymes raise the concentration of ammonia in the urine. Ammonia makes up the crystals that form struvite stones. The stone-promoting bacteria are usually Proteus, but may also include Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Providencia, Serratia, and staphylococci. Women are twice as likely to have struvite stones as men.

Other stones, including cystine and xanthine stones, are usually due to genetic abnormalities.

Causes of Cystine Stones. Cystine stones develop from genetic defects that cause abnormal transport of amino acids in the kidney and gastrointestinal system leading to a build-up of cystine, one of these amino acids. Researchers have identified two genes responsible for this condition: SLC3A1 and CLC7A9.

Causes of Xanthine Stones. In some cases, xanthine stones may develop in patients being treated with allopurinol for gout.

Risk Factors

Kidney stones are one of the most common disorders of the urinary tract. They are an ancient health problem. Evidence of kidney stones has been found in an Egyptian mummy estimated to be more than 7,000 years old.

An estimated 1.3 million Americans seek medical help for kidney stones each year. At this time, studies suggest kidney stones affect over 5% of Americans and that the rate has increased since the 1970s, perhaps because of increases in animal and dietary protein intake.

Men. The risk of kidney stones increases in a man's 40s and continues to rise until age 70. Caucasian men are at higher risk than other groups.

Women. The risk of kidney stones peaks in a woman's 50s. In younger women, stones are more likely to develop during the late stages of pregnancy. Pregnant women tend to have a higher calcium intake, but their kidneys do no handle the calcium as well as they did prior to pregnancy. Kidney stones are still a rare occurrence during pregnancy, however, affecting only 1 in 1,500 pregnancies.

Risk Factors in Children. Stones in the urinary tract in children are usually due to genetic factors. Most of the time, the cause is too much calcium in the urine (hypercalciuria). Deformities in the urinary tract pose a significant risk for kidney stones in children. Children with low birth weight who need to be fed intravenously are also at risk for stones.

Obesity and weight gain are both associated with an increased risk of kidney stones.

Men who weigh more than 220 lbs are 44% more likely to develop kidney stones than men who weigh less than 150 lbs.
Women who are obese are 90% more likely to develop kidney stones than women with a lower body mass index (BMI).

Higher BMIs and larger waist circumferences are both risk factors for kidney stones. Researchers think that there may be a link between fat tissue, insulin resistance, and urine composition. People with larger body sizes may excrete more calcium and uric acid, which increase the risk of kidney stone formation.

A family history of kidney stones increases one's risk for the condition. Researchers are looking into markers or other factors that might predict kidney stones in relatives, although none has yet been clearly identified. One report found that among the siblings of patients with calcium stones, sisters with higher urinary calcium levels and more acidic urine were more likely to develop stones. Brothers with high urinary calcium, low urinary potassium, and older age were more likely to have the problem. A family history of gout may also make a person vulnerable to stones.

According to a 2003 study of American ethnic groups, Caucasians have the highest incidence of kidney stones (5.9%) followed by Mexican Americans (2.6%). African-Americans have the lowest risk (1.7%).

Dietary factors, minerals in local water, or both may contribute to geographic differences that have been observed in the occurrence of kidney stones. Studies have reported the highest occurrence of kidney stones in the southern region of the United States and the lowest in the west. One study suggested that the higher risk may be due to a higher rate of high blood pressure in the southern states and certain dietary habits, particularly lower intake of magnesium and low use of calcium supplements.

Specific Foods. In general, certain foods increase the risk for stones only in people who have genetic or medical vulnerability. People whose diets are high in animal protein and low in fiber and fluids may be at higher risk for stones. A number of foods contain oxalic acid, but there is no proof that such foods make any major contribution to calcium oxalate stones in people without other risk factors. However, several studies have shown that increasing dietary calcium and restricting salt, animal protein, and foods rich in oxalate can help prevent calcium oxalate stones from returning.

Stress. One study reported that people who had a major, stressful life experience were more likely to develop stones than those who had not. Some experts speculate that this increased risk may be due to a hormone called vasopressin, which is released in response to stress. Vasopressin also increases the concentration of urine.

Sleep Position. Sleeping in the same position consistently may influence risk. A 2001 study reported that in people who had a history of kidney stones, recurrences tended to occur on the same side that people slept on. An earlier study suggested that people who had kidney stones were more apt to sleep on their stomachs. Movement during sleep did not appear to affect the risk.

Being Bedridden. Any medical or physical condition that keeps a person in bed or immobile increases blood levels of calcium from bone breakdown, thereby posing a risk for stone formation.

Gout. Patients with gout are at a high risk of uric acid stones. These patients have very acidic urine, and a 2002 study suggested that the two disorders may have a common source.

High Blood Pressure. Persons with high blood pressure are up to three times more likely to develop kidney stones. It is not entirely clear whether having high blood pressure increases the risk for a stone, whether stones lead to high blood pressure, or if there is an action linking both.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis cause problems in absorption of substances in the intestines. These problems significantly increase the risk for kidney stones, particularly in men.

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): Urinary tract infections are almost always the cause of struvite stones.

Hyperparathyroidism: The parathyroid glands regulate calcium levels in the body through the parathyroid hormone. In hyperparathyroidism, one or more of these glands makes too much parathyroid hormone. Some people with hyperparathyroidism develop kidney stones. Surgery to remove the hyperactive parathyroid gland in such patients reduces the risk for stone formation, but the risk still remains high for some time after surgery.

Other Medical Conditions. Kidney disease, chronic diarrhea, certain cancers (such as leukemia and lymphoma), and sarcoidosis put people at higher risk for stones.

AIDS medications. Over 10% of persons with AIDS who take the medicine indinavir develop stones. The risk is even higher in patients with AIDS who also have hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or hemophilia, as well as those who are very thin or who take the antibiotic combination TMP-SMX. In one study of persons with AIDS who took a combination of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine, 36% developed kidney stones.

Other Drugs. Kidney stones are a rare side effect of thyroid hormones and loop diuretics (drugs that increase urination). In fact, diuretics are also used to prevent calcium stones. Certain cancer chemotherapies can also cause kidney stones. Long-term use of medications, such as antacids, which change the acidic content of urine, may increase the risk for kidney stones.

Symptoms

In many cases, kidney stones do not produce symptoms. However, if a stone becomes stuck in the ureter (the thin tube between the bladder and the kidney), symptoms can be very severe. Often, they vary depending on the stone's location and its progress.

Kidney stone attacks tend to be most common late at night or in the early morning, possibly because of minimal urine output or constriction of the ureters during the early morning hours. Kidney stone attacks are least common during the late afternoon

Pain usually begins abruptly on one side and then usually continues as intense, constant pain. (In some cases it persists for a few minutes, disappears, and then returns after about 10 minutes.)
The patient cannot become comfortable and usually stands, sits, paces, or reclines in a vain search for a position that will bring relief.
If the stone is in the kidney or upper urinary tract, the pain usually starts in one flank area (to the side of the back near the waist). It typically moves to the groin as the stone passes down.
If the stone is too large to pass easily, the pain follows the muscle contractions in the wall of the ureter as they try to squeeze the stone along into the bladder.
Nausea and vomiting may occur.
Blood in the urine may be present.
As the stone passes down the ureter closer to the bladder, a person may feel the need to urinate more often or a burning sensation during urination.
If fever and chills accompany any of these symptoms, an infection may be present.

The size of the stone does not necessarily predict the severity of the pain; a very tiny crystal with sharp edges can cause intense pain while a larger round stone may not be as distressing. Struvite stones can often occur without symptoms.

Diagnosis

The doctor will perform a physical exam. This includes pressing against abdominal areas for tender locations that might indicate the presence of the stone.

The patient's age is a significant factor. Kidney stones that occur in children and young patients are more apt to result from inherited problems that cause cystine, xanthine, or, in some cases, calcium oxalate stones. In adult patients, calcium stones are most common.

A medical history may help predict which crystal has formed the stone. The doctor will need to know the following:

Any previous kidney stone attacks
Histories of cancer, sarcoidosis, or small bowel disease
Any medications being taken, including non-prescription substances, particularly high doses of vitamins D or C and calcium-containing antacids

Many conditions can cause symptoms similar to kidney stones. Usually the diagnosis is easily made because of the specific nature of the symptoms, but it is not always clear. Urinary tract infections can cause similar, but usually less intense, pain. In fact, infection may be present with a kidney stone. Other causes of pain that may mimic kidney stones include:

Gallstones
Diverticulitis (infection or irritation of abnormal pockets in the intestines)
Intestinal blockage
Blood clots
Irritable bowel syndrome
Appendicitis
Stomach ulcers
Hiatal hernia (when the upper part of the stomach bulges into the chest, through an opening in the diaphragm)
Pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas)
Hepatitis
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's and colitis)
Heart attack

Various imaging techniques are helpful in determining the presence of kidney stones. The best approach uses spiral (or helical) computed tomography scans. If it is not available, the patient will need ultrasound or standard x-rays. If no stones show up, but the patient has severe pain that suggests the presence of kidney stones, the next step is an intravenous pyelogram.

X-Rays. A standard x-ray of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder may be a good first step for identifying many stones, since many are visible on x-rays. Calcium stones can be identified on x-rays by their white color. Cystine crystals can also show up on x-rays.

Spiral (or Helical) Computed Tomography. A type of computed tomography (CT) scan, called a spiral or helical CT scan, is currently the best method for diagnosing stones in either the kidneys or the ureters. This test is fast, does not require instruments or foreign chemicals to enter the body, and provides detailed accurate images of even very small stones. If stones are not present, a spiral CT scan can often identify other causes of pain in the kidney area. It is better than x-rays, ultrasound, and intravenous pyelogram -- the previous standard test for detecting kidney stones. Experts hope spiral CT will eventually be able to identify the chemicals present in a stone.

Ultrasound. Ultrasound can detect clear uric acid stones and obstruction in the urinary tract. It is not useful for finding very small stones, but some research indicates that it may be a useful first diagnostic step in the emergency room to help predict the likelihood of a stone, including suspected stones in children.

Intravenous Pyelogram. With intravenous pyelogram (IVP), the doctor injects a special dye into the patient. A technician will then take x-rays as the dye enters the kidneys and travels down the urinary tract. IVP is invasive but, until recently, was the most cost-effective method for detecting stones. Where it is available, spiral CT is now preferred, since it gives a faster diagnosis, is more accurate, is safer, and is similar in cost.

In any case, IVP should not be used on patients with kidney failure. There is also a risk for an allergic reaction to standard dyes, although newer less allergenic ones are becoming available.

In the procedure intravenous pyelogram (IVP), the patient is injected with dye. X-rays are taken as the dye travels through the urinary tract. This procedure is done to confirm the presence of kidney stones, although some stones may be too small to see.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are showing promise for diagnosing urinary tract obstruction but do not yet accurately reveal small stones, or ones that do not cause a blockage. Because no radiation is involved with MRI, however, it may prove to be a good option for pregnant women.

Urine samples are required to evaluate features of the urine, including its acidity and the presence of:

Red or white blood cells
Infection
Crystals
High or low levels of chemicals that inhibit or promote stone formation

Clean-Catch Urine Sample for Culturing. After determining that a kidney stone is present, the health care provider usually gives the patient a collection kit, including filters, to try to catch the stone or gravel as it passes out. The urine may also be tested (cultured) for the presence of infection-causing organisms. A clean-catch urine sample is almost always required for culturing. To provide a clean catch, do the following:

First, wash your hands thoroughly, then wash the penis or vulva and surrounding area four times with downward strokes, using a new soapy sponge each time.
Begin urinating into the toilet and stop after a few drops.
Position the container to catch the middle portion of the urine stream. Ideally, this urine will contain only the bacteria and other evidence of the stone.
Urinate the remainder into the toilet.
Tighten the cap on the container securely, being careful not to touch the inside of the rim.

Click the icon to see an image of a calcium urine test.

Twenty-Four Hour Urine Collection. A 24-hour urine collection may be needed to measure urine volume and levels of acidity, calcium, sodium, uric acid, oxalate, citrate, and creatinine.

You should not change any of your usual eating or drinking patterns when performing this test.
Discard the first urination on the day of the test.
Afterward all urine passed over the next 24 hours is collected, including the first urination on the morning of day two.
A second 24-hour urine collection may be needed to determine if treatment is working or if the first analysis was not conclusive and the doctor suspects a less common stone, such as a cystine or xanthine stone.

Click the icon to see an image of a uric acid urine test.

Urine tests that are used to determine the specific chemical and biological factors causing the stone should be performed about 6 weeks after the attack, since the attack itself may change the levels of such substances, including calcium, phosphate, and citrate. It should be noted that calcium levels in the urine may be abnormal even in many people without stones. In addition, high urinary concentrations of calcium may pose a greater or lesser risk depending on age. (In one 2001 study, middle-aged adults with high urinary calcium concentrations had a much greater risk than older adults with high levels.)

The kidney stones obtained from the urine sample are examined under a microscope. The crystal formations are often specific enough so that the doctor is able to identify the substance causing the stone.

Calcium oxalate crystals are eight-sided, while calcium phosphate crystals tend to have irregular shapes.
Uric acid stones are sometimes described as pear-shaped or diamond-shaped.
Some struvite stones have very specific shapes commonly described as "coffin lids." Struvite crystals may also occur in a formation known as a staghorn, which can be large and damaging to the kidney.

Testing whether urine is acidic or alkaline helps to identify the specific type of stone. The levels of acidity or alkalinity in any solution, including urine, are indicated by the pH scale:

A pH value of 7.0 is neutral.
A solution with a low pH (below 7.0) is acidic. (A low pH favors uric acid and cystine stones.)
A solution with a high pH is alkaline. (A high pH favors calcium phosphate and struvite stones.)

A dipstick test for blood in the urine (called hematuria) is typically performed when patients appear in the emergency room with flank pain (the primary symptom of kidney stones). About a third of kidney stone patients, however, do not show blood in the urine, so other tests may be needed.

Blood Tests for Stone Factors. Blood and urine tests help determine what substances form the crystals. This allows the doctor to determine the appropriate treatment and preventive measures.

Blood tests may help determine blood levels of urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, and uric acid for patients with known or suspected calcium oxalate stones. Doctors will usually schedule these tests about 6 weeks after the attack, in order to measure these substances when the stone has been passed, and the patient has been stabilized. This is particularly true in patients with recurrent stones.

Parathyroid Tests. Tests to detect parathyroid hormone levels are given if the doctor suspects hyperparathyroidism, based on other signs and symptoms.

Tests for Infection. A test result that shows a high white blood cell count might indicate infection. Such results, however, could be misleading, since the number of white blood cells could also increase in response to the extreme physical stress of a kidney stone attack.

Tests for Metabolic Problems. About half of children with stones have an identifiable metabolic disorder, which increases their risk of stone recurrence five-fold. Experts argue whether tests for metabolic disorders are routinely needed once the stone composition has been determined. Studies suggest the following:

People with recurrent calcium stones have a wide range of irregular blood or urine test results, indicating a variety of possible metabolic disorders. For example, calcium stones in middle-aged women may be due to parathyroid abnormalities.
Calcium phosphate stones most likely result from renal tubular acidosis.
People with non-calcium stones generally have identifiable metabolic disorders.
Determining the stone composition may be sufficient for treatment, and may help avoid unnecessary metabolic tests.

Treatment

When tests show there is a kidney stone, the next step is to determine treatment. The patient should be admitted to the emergency room if they have severe vomiting, fever, or symptoms of infection.

Strong opioid painkillers, such as meperidine (Demerol), are often required for a severe kidney stone attack. However, doctors will usually not give such drugs until they confirm the presence of a kidney stone on an x-ray. In some cases, powerful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may work just as well as opioids, and they have fewer side effects. However, they do take longer to work.

In about 85% of patients, the kidney stones are small enough that they pass through normal urination, usually within 2 to 3 days. In some cases, a stone may take weeks to months to pass, although pain usually goes away before that.

The patient should drink plenty of water (two to three quarts a day) to help move the stone along, and take painkillers as needed. The doctor usually provides a collection kit with a filter and asks the patient to save any passed stones for testing.

If the stone has not passed in 2 - 3 days, the patient will need additional treatments. In some severe cases, hospitalization may be necessary.

Specific procedures vary depending on the size of the stone or complexity of the situation. Noninvasive procedures are proving to be very beneficial in eliminating stones, and have largely replaced invasive surgeries.

For small stones that are lodged in the lower part of the ureter, ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy are the procedures of choice.
For larger stones, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and shock wave lithotripsy are all potentially useful. The choice of any of these procedures depends on a number of factors, including location of the stone and the presence of any problems that caused the stone in the first place.
In some complicated cases, standard open surgical procedures (called nephrolithotomy) may be required.

See "Other Treatments" section for more information on kidney stone surgery.


Stone Type	Diet and Lifestyle	Medications	Procedures
Calcium Oxalate	Plenty of fluids. (Choose water, lemon juice. Avoid grapefruit, apple, and cranberry juice.) Limit the amount of protein and salt in the diet. Increase fiber. Limit the amount of fats in the diet, particularly in people who have short bowel syndrome. Balance normal calcium intake with potassium- and phosphate-rich foods. Limit the amount of calcium in the diet (only in people who have genetic abnormalities that cause high intestinal absorption of calcium). Limit the amount of foods high in oxalates (only in patients with rare intestinal conditions that cause hyperoxaluria).	Diuretics ("water pills"), Citrate salts, phosphates, cholestyramine.	Lithotripsy, uteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open surgery.
Uric Acid	Plenty of fluids. (Choose water, blackcurrant juice. Avoid cranberry juice.) Increase calcium intake (be sure well-balanced with potassium and phosphates). Reduce protein and other foods with high-purine content.	Potassium citrate, sodium bicarbonate, allopurinol.	Lithotripsy, uteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open surgery.
Struvite stones	Plenty of fluids (water, cranberry juice). Reduce proteins.	Antibiotics to eliminate any infection. Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) may be helpful in combination with antibiotics. In some cases, organic acids given through urinary tract.	May respond poorly to most lithotripsy procedures and require open surgery. Newer procedures may be helpful.
Cystine stones	Very high fluid intake (four quarts a day). Limit the amount of protein in the diet.	Alkalizing agents (such as bicarbonate). Sometimes d-penicillamine, tiopronine, or captopril useful for lowering cystine levels.	May respond poorly to most lithotripsy procedures and require open surgery. Newer procedures may be helpful.

Medications

Diuretics. Diuretics are medicines commonly used to treat high blood pressure and other disorders. They remove fluid and sodium from the body. Low doses of a class of diuretics known as thiazides are sometimes used to reduce the amount of calcium released by the kidneys into the urine. Thiazides include:

Hydrochlorothiazide (Esidrix, HydroDiuril)
Chlorothiazide (Diuril)
Trichlormethiazide (Metahydrin, Naqua)
Chlorthalidone (Hygroton)

However, thiazides also cause potassium loss, which reduces citrate levels and can increase the risk for stones. Patients taking thiazide pills should also take potassium citrate, to prevent citrate loss. Amiloride (Midamor) is a potassium-sparing diuretic, which may be used if a thiazide does not work.

Citrates. Citrate salts are often given to people with calcium oxalate or uric acid stones:

Potassium magnesium citrate is available over the counter. It is proving to be very beneficial in preventing kidney stones. In one study, potassium magnesium citrate reduced the risk for kidney stone recurrence by 85%.
Potassium citrate (K-Lyte, Polycitra-K, Urocit-K) is given as the only treatment to people with normal urine calcium levels. Between 70 - 75% of patients with recurrent stones have ongoing remission (no stone recurrence) with potassium citrate treatment. However, some people cannot tolerate potassium citrate because of side effects (stomach problems).
Magnesium citrate (Citroma, Citro-Nesia) may help people who develop calcium stones from impaired intestinal absorption due to short bowel disease.

None of these products should be used by people with struvite stones, urinary tract infections, bleeding disorders, or kidney damage. Patients who take citrate supplements containing potassium should not take any other medications that either contain this mineral or prevent its loss (such as so-called potassium-sparing diuretics). People with peptic ulcers should avoid citrate supplements, or discuss using non-tablet forms with their doctor.

Phosphates. Phosphates help reduce the breakdown of bone that releases calcium into the bloodstream. They are also involved in the kidney's reabsorption of calcium from the urine.

Phosphate compounds:

Neutral (nonacidic) sodium or potassium phosphate (K-Phos, Neutral, Neutra-Phos) is usually taken four times a day after meals to prevent kidney stones unless otherwise directed by the doctor. Diarrhea is a possible side effect.
Cellulose phosphate (Calcibind) is recommended only for severe hypercalciuria that is associated with recurrent calcium stones and is caused by excessive absorption of calcium from the intestines. However, this drug may increase oxalate levels and decrease magnesium levels, which can lead to different stones. Taking magnesium supplements and reducing dietary oxalates, calcium, and ascorbic acid may help offset these risks. Cellulose phosphate may also cause bloating.

Avoid acidic forms of phosphate, since they increase the risks for both hypocitraturia and hypercalciuria.

Cholestyramine (Questran, Questran Light) is a drug used to reduce cholesterol levels. However, it also binds with oxalate in the intestine, so it is also used to reduce high oxalate levels in urine (hyperoxaluria). The drug usually comes in a powder that is dissolved in liquid.

Bloating and constipation are common side effects of this drug. Cholestyramine also interferes with other medications, including digoxin (Lanoxin) and warfarin, and may contribute to calcium loss and osteoporosis. In order to prevent such interactions, take other drugs 1 hour before, or 4 - 6 hours after, taking cholestyramine.

Long-term use of cholestyramine may cause deficiencies of vitamins A, D, E, and K. Vitamin supplements may be necessary.

Sodium Bicarbonate. Patients whose persistently acidic urine causes uric acid stones may take sodium bicarbonate to reduce urine acidity. Patients taking sodium bicarbonate must test their urine regularly with pH paper, which turns different colors depending on whether the urine is acidic or alkaline. Too much sodium bicarbonate can cause the urine to become too alkaline. This increases the risk for calcium phosphate stones. Patients who need to reduce the amount of sodium they take in (as a result of other medical conditions) should not use sodium bicarbonate.

Potassium Citrate. Potassium citrate, which restores citrate to the urine, is useful for patients with high levels of uric acid in the urine.

Allopurinol. Allopurinol (Lupurin, Zyloprim) is very effective in reducing high levels of uric acid, and may be helpful for patients with uric acid stones. Allopurinol will not prevent calcium stones from forming. There is also a slight risk for the formation of xanthine stones with this drug. Side effects include diarrhea, headache, and fever. More severe complications include blood disorders that may produce fatigue, bleeding, or bruising. The drug may also increase the risk for cataracts.

About 2% of patients experience an allergic reaction to allopurinol that causes a rash. In rare cases, the rash can become severe and widespread enough to be life threatening. Allergic individuals who have experienced only a mild rash to sodium bicarbonate may be able to build up their tolerance for allopurinol by undergoing a desensitization process. In this process, patients start with small doses of allopurinol and gradually increase them, if no reaction develops.

Allopurinol reduces uric acid levels rapidly, so it may trigger an attack of gout in vulnerable people. To prevent this problem, patients taking allopurinol should also take a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for 2 or 3 months. Aspirin should not be taken, since it increases uric acid levels. Patients should discuss the appropriate NSAID choice with their doctor.

Before patients can receive any medical treatment for struvite stones, they must have surgery to completely remove the stones.

Antibiotics for Eliminating Infection. Persons with struvite stones receive ongoing treatment with antibiotics to keep the urine free of the bacteria that cause urinary tract infections. Careful follow-up and urine testing is extremely important. A high-pH urine indicates low acidity and an increased risk of infection.

Acetohydroxamic Acid (AHA). Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA or Lithostat) is beneficial when used with long-term antibiotics. AHA blocks enzymes that bacteria release, and has been effective in preventing stones even when bacteria are present. Side effects, however, can be severe. The drug reduces iron levels in the body, so anemia is a common problem. Patients may need to take iron supplements. Other side effects include nausea, vomiting, depression, anxiety, rash, persistent headache, and, rarely, small blood clots in the legs.

Experts recommend this drug only for patients with healthy kidneys who have chronic diseases caused by specific struvite-causing organisms.

Patients taking this medicine should avoid alcohol. Pregnant women should not take acetohydroxamic acid.

Organic Acids. Medical treatments to dissolve stones may be useful in patients who do not respond to other medications, or in combination with surgeries. Acidic urine dissolves struvite stones, so the doctor may wash the urinary tract with a solution of organic acids (such as Renacidin). Candidates for such washes must have sterile urine (no bacteria or other organisms in the urine) and healthy kidney function. In surgical patients, the wash is performed 4 or 5 days after the operation. The wash starts with saline (salt solution) for 1 - 2 days and, if there are no problems, the organic acid solution follows for another 1 or 2 days, until all stones dissolve. Regular urine tests are necessary to ensure that the bacteria do not return.

Aluminum Hydroxide Gel. An aluminum hydroxide anti-acid gel may reduce phosphate levels that are important in struvite stone formation, but it has a long-term risk of causing aluminum toxicity. Long-term reduction of phosphorus can also increase the risk for calcium oxalate stones. Experts recommend limiting phosphorus through a low-protein diet, rather than through the use of this gel.

The first-line treatment for cystine stones is increasing the alkalization of urine so the stones can dissolve. If alkalization fails, drug treatments may include d-penicillamine, alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine (tiopronine), or captopril. These medications lower cystine concentration.

Patients with cystine stones must drink plenty of fluids, much more than patients with other stones. The patients should drink at least four quarts of water over a 24-hour period.

Other Treatments

Surgery is usually needed if the stone is too large to pass on its own, if there are signs that the stone is growing, or if the stone is blocking the urine flow and causing a urinary tract infection or kidney damage.

Until recently, the procedure to remove a stone was a very painful, major surgery, requiring 4-6 weeks of recovery. Today, treatments for stones are much less invasive. Major surgery is performed in less than 2% of patients.

Stone removal procedures:

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is used for small stones (less than one centimeter, or slightly less than half an inch) that occur in the upper part of the ureter and do not pass on their own. One study indicated lithotripsy might even be safe and effective for patients whose stones are associated with malformed kidneys, although such patients are at higher risk for stone recurrence and should be carefully monitored.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PNL can be used for very large stones in the upper urinary tract, when ESWL fails, for kidney transplant patients, or when the kidneys or surrounding areas are malformed. PNL is the preferred procedure for drug-resistant cystine stones, which are usually also resistant to shock wave therapy.
Ureteroscopy. For stones in the lower tract, ureteroscopy is generally the best procedure, although lithotripsy is also usually feasible and patients ordinarily prefer it.
Standard open surgery (nephrolithotomy) may be required if any of these procedures fail or are not appropriate, or in special cases, such as when the patient is very obese.

Most procedures are more effective for calcium and uric acid stones and less effective for struvite and cystine stones, although new techniques may be improving their effects on all stones.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a technique that uses sound waves (ultrasound) to break up simple stones in the kidney or upper urinary tract. ("Extracorporeal" means "outside the body," and "lithotripsy" means stone-breaking.) ESWL is not used for cystine stones. The procedure generally does not work for stones larger than three centimeters in diameter (which is slightly over an inch). There are several variations of ESWL. The following is a typical procedure:

Most ESWL procedures use some anesthesia, although they are often done on an outpatient basis.
The patient is positioned in a water bath. (In some procedures the patient lies on a soft cushion.)
The procedure uses ultrasound to generate shock waves that travel through the skin and body tissues until they hit the dense stones. (The doctor pinpoints the stone during treatment by using x-rays or ultrasound.)
The shock waves crush the stones into tiny sand-like pieces that usually pass easily through the urinary tract.
The shattered stone fragments may cause discomfort as they pass through the urinary tract. In such cases, the doctor may insert a small tube called a stent through the bladder into the ureter to help the fragments pass. This practice, however, has not proved to speed up passage of the stones in most cases and is not used routinely.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a procedure used to shatter simple stones in the kidney or upper urinary tract. Ultrasonic waves are passed through the body until they strike the dense stones. Pulses of sonic waves pulverize the stones, which are then more easily passed through the ureter and out of the body in the urine.

Success rates of ESWL range from 50 - 90%, depending on the location of the stone and the surgeon's technique and level of experience. Recovery time is short, and most people can resume normal activities in a few days.

Complications. Complications may include the following:

The most common complication is blood in the urine, which lasts for a few days after treatment. To reduce the chances of bleeding, doctors usually tell patients to avoid taking aspirin and other NSAIDs, which can promote bleeding, for 7 - 10 days before the treatment.
Bruising and minor discomfort due to the shock waves are common in the back or abdomen.
Sometimes the stone does not completely break up with one treatment, and additional treatments may be required. Inability to pass stone fragments may also be a particular problem in patients who have cysts or other kidney problems.
Higher risk for diabetes later. A 2006 study published in the journal Urology found that 17% of patients who received shock-wave lithotripsy developed diabetes later in life. The diabetes risk was related to the number and intensity of shocks.
Higher risk for hypertension (high blood pressure). The same study that linked ESWL to diabetes also showed that people who received shock-wave lithotripsy treatment were 47% more likely to develop high blood pressure than those who had their stones treated without surgery.

ESWL appears to be safe for children, although a 2001 study reported temporary damage in the kidney tubules after treatment. It is unclear if this complication has any long-term consequences. Experts recommend using the least amount of shocks and impact possible in young people. If more than one treatment is needed, there should be a waiting period of at least 15 days between treatments.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be used when ESWL is not available or effective (such as if the stone is very large, in an inaccessible location, or is a cystine stone). It is also preferred over ESWL for stones that have remained in the ureter for more than 4 weeks.

It is more effective than ESWL for patients with severe obesity, and appears to be safe for the very elderly and the very young. Success rates are nearly 98% for kidney stones and 88% for ureteral stones. They may vary by the technique used and the specific patients. For example, success rates are slightly lower in children, although the procedure can be done safely in young patients. Long-term effects are unknown.

A typical procedure is as follows:

The surgeon makes a tiny incision in the back and creates a tunnel directly into the kidney.
The surgeon then inserts an instrument called a nephroscope through the tunnel.
The stone is located and removed. If it is large, it is destroyed using ultrasound, lasers, or other devices. The surgeon then removes the fragments. An advantage of percutaneous nephrolithotomy over ESWL is that the surgeon is able to remove the stone fragments directly, instead of relying on their natural passage from the kidney.
Generally, patients stay in the hospital for 5 or 6 days and may need a small device called a nephrostomy tube left in the kidney during the healing process.

Devices Used to Destroy Stones. For large stones, some type of energy-delivering device may be needed to break the stone into small pieces. They are referred to as intracorporeal lithotripsy devices (meaning stone breakers within the body). The device may be one of the following:

Ultrasound is currently the preferred method. It results in a stone-free rate of 94%. A rigid nephroscope delivers the ultrasound waves.
Pneumatic (compressed air) lithotripsy uses a probe that comes in direct contract with a stone. Compressed air causes a piston to collide rapidly with the probe, and the result is a "jackhammer" action against the stone, causing the stone to break up. This method, however, can send stone fragments into other parts of the urinary tract.
A more recent device uses a combination pneumatic probe and ultrasound, with stone-free rates of 80 - 89%. It may prove to be superior to ultrasound alone and be effective against stones of all types.
The holmium laser literally melts the stones and destroys up to 100% of stones of any composition. It uses a flexible nephroscope and has an excellent safety record. It should be used sparingly, however, with particular caution against large uric acid stones until more is understood about its effect. Another device, the erbium: YAG laser, although showing promise in lithotripsy, is not currently practical.

Complications. Complication rates are about 3%. Major complications occur in about 1% of cases. These complications may include scarring of the tissue, but studies indicate that it does not impair kidney function, even if the patient requires repeat surgery. There is also a risk for blood loss during and after the procedure, which, in some cases, can be significant.

Because the procedure requires large volumes of fluid, fluid overload is a potential problem, particularly in children or patients with heart disease.

In some cases, infection may result. Other complications may include a collapsed lung and injuries to areas outside the kidney (but within the operative area), such as the abdomen or chest.

Ureteroscopy may be used for stones in the middle and lower ureter. With the arrival of smaller instruments, this procedure can be done successfully in children as well. The procedure involves the following:

The patient receives a general anesthetic, though no incision is required for the procedure.
The surgeon passes a small fiberoptic instrument called a ureteroscope through the urethra and bladder into the ureter.
The surgeon locates the stone or stones.
The surgeon can remove smaller stones by grasping them with small forceps. A laser or pneumatic device breaks up large stones.
The surgeon may decide to leave a small tube, or stent, in the ureter for a few days after treatment, to help the lining of the ureter heal.

Complication rates range from 10 - 20%, with major problems occurring in up to 6% of patients. In some cases, large stones are not broken up into small enough pieces. This can result in blockage of the urinary tract and possible kidney damage.

Imaging tests, such as ultrasound or spiral CT, are useful within 3 months to check for residual stones, and a second procedure may be required. The risk of complications is highest when the procedure is performed by less experienced surgeons, or if stones are found in the kidney. The risk for perforation of the ureter increases the longer the procedure takes.

Open surgery involves incisions through the patient's flank and into the kidney. The surgeon will cool the kidneys using ice. X-rays during the procedure help locate the stone. At the beginning of the surgery, the surgeon will isolate the arteries supplying the kidneys, ensuring they are not harmed during the surgery. The surgeon will then locate and remove the stone. The surgeon will also correct any blockage in the affected area. The surgery, called nephrolithotomy, is very invasive and is restricted to the following:

Patients with very large or complex stones that cannot be removed using less invasive measures
Very obese patients

Some centers report success with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, however, in patients who would normally be nephrolithotomy candidates. Therefore, even these patients should discuss other options with their surgeon.

The procedure is not appropriate for patients with:

Bleeding or clotting disorders
Untreated widespread infection
Severe and chronic kidney insufficiency (unless removing the stone will improve kidney function)

Complications

Between 70 - 90% of crystals remain tiny enough so that they can travel through the urinary tract and leave the body in the urine without being noticed. When they do cause symptoms, however, kidney stones have been described as one of the most painful disorders to afflict humans. The pain they cause is sometimes called renal colic. ("Renal" means "kidney.")

Obstruction and Infection. Although kidney stones often lead to obstruction (blockage) of the urinary tract, the blockage is usually temporary and causes no lasting damage. In some cases, however, particularly if the obstruction progresses with no symptoms, infection may occur, which can be serious and need immediate attention.

Kidney Failure. It is very rare for kidney stones to cause kidney failure, although some people have risk factors that make them more vulnerable to this serious complication. Risk factors include the following:

Very frequent recurrences (such as in people with cystine stones or other inherited forms of kidney stone disorders)
Accompanying episodes of urinary tract infections with obstruction, a particular risk with struvite stones
A history of multiple urologic procedures for kidney stones
Greater size of the kidney stone gravel

Without preventive treatment, calcium stones recur in 10% of patients within a year of the first attack, and in half of patients within 5 - 7 years. Individual risk for recurrence, however, varies depending on the stone and the underlying condition. For example, a 15-year-old with inherited cystine stones has a very high risk for recurrence, while a middle-aged man with a first calcium oxalate stone has a good chance of never passing another.

Prevention

All individuals who have experienced kidney stones should take some specific preventive measures to prevent recurrence. The following are some general observations:

The most important dietary recommendations for reducing the risk for calcium stones are increasing fluid intake, restricting sodium, and reducing protein intake.
A lower risk for calcium stones is also associated with higher potassium intake.
A high calcium diet does not appear to increase the risk for kidney stones as long as it also contains plenty of fluids and dietary potassium and phosphate. (Increasing calcium alone may pose a modest risk for stones.)
Patients should try to correct any dietary habits that cause acidic or alkaline imbalances in the urine, which promote stone formation.

Because different kidney stone types may require specific dietary changes, patients should work with their doctors to develop an individualized plan. It is important to note that nutritional considerations are very important in preventing recurrence, and patients should be vigilant in complying with the proper diet.

Good voiding habits, particularly frequent urination, are important. Therefore, of all the preventive recommendations, drinking enough fluids is the most important guideline for people with any type of kidney stones.

In general, patients with calcium or uric acid stones should drink at least 10 full glasses of fluid each day (at least half should be water). This includes one with each meal and drinking fluids at night, even if it means getting up from sleep. Fluid intake should produce at least two and a half quarts of urine each day.
To prevent cystine stones, patients should drink even more water -- over a gallon, or 16 8-ounce cups, every day. Patients should drink this amount at regular intervals throughout the night and day.

In all cases, patients need more fluid after exertion and during times of stress. If they drink enough, the urine should be pale and almost watery, not dark and yellow.

Water. Although water is best, it may vary depending on its source. Variations in water itself may have different impacts. One study reported that drinking hard tap water increased urinary calcium concentration by 50% compared to soft bottled water. On the other hand, mineral water containing both calcium and magnesium may reduce several risk factors for both calcium and uric acid stone formation.

Juices and Specific Effects. Other beverages have various positive or negative effects, depending on the type of stone:

Lemon Juice: Drinking one-half cup of pure lemon juice (enough to make eight glasses of lemonade) every day raises citrate levels in the urine, which might protect against calcium stones. (While orange juice also increases citrate levels, it does not lower calcium and it raises oxalate levels. Therefore, it is not recommended.)
Cranberry and Apple Juice: Apple and cranberry juice contain oxalates, and both have been associated with a higher risk for calcium oxalate stones. Cranberry juice has properties that may increase the risk for both calcium oxalate and uric acid stones. On the other hand, cranberry juice helps prevent urinary tract infections and so may be helpful for reducing the risk for struvite and brushite stones. (These stones are far less common, however.)
Black Currant Juice: In one study, black currant juice reduced urine acidity and was associated with protection against uric acid stones.
Grapefruit Juice: A number of studies have found a risk for stones from drinking grapefruit juice. In one study, just one 8-ounce cup of grapefruit juice per day increased the risk for forming stones by 44%.

Other Beverages and Their Effects on Stone Formation.

Soft Drinks. Patients with stones should avoid cola drinks, since they can severely reduce citrate levels in the urine. Many soft drinks contain phosphoric acid, which increases the risk for stones. Some research shows that drinking one quart (less than three 12-ounce cans) of soda per week may increase a person's risk of developing stones by 15%.
Alcohol. Wine may be protective against kidney stones. A study conducted in Finland, suggests that the risk of developing stones also decreases with beer consumption. However, it is important to remember that beer is high in oxalates. Beer and other alcoholic beverages also contain purines, which may increase the specific risk for the less common uric acid stones in susceptible people. Binge drinking, in any case, increases uric acid and the risk for stones.
Coffee and Tea. Some research reported a lower risk for stones in people who drink tea and both regular and decaffeinated coffee.

A long-term 2002 study followed men with calcium oxalate stones and high levels of urinary calcium. The study found that a low-sodium, low-protein diet, containing normal levels of calcium, dramatically reduced the recurrence of stones compared to a diet that was simply low in calcium.

Salt Restriction. Because salt intake increases the amount of calcium in urine, patients with calcium stones should limit their sodium intake. Sodium may also increase levels of urate, the crystalline substance that can trigger formation of recurrent calcium oxalate stones. Although the relative contribution of limiting sodium intake has not been confirmed, some researchers believe that restricting sodium along with increasing fluid intake is the most important dietary measure for preventing stones.

Protein Restriction. Protein increases uric acid, calcium, and oxalate levels in the urine, and reduces citrate levels. Diets high in protein, particularly meat protein, have been consistently connected with kidney stones. (Meat protein has a higher sulfur content and produces more acid than vegetable protein.) A 2002 study of those following a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet (such as the Atkins diet, for example), found dramatically increased levels of urinary uric acid and calcium after just several weeks. These effects put patients at higher risk for not just kidney stones, but possibly osteoporosis as well. According to Swiss studies, about a third of people at risk for calcium stones may have a sensitivity to meat proteins that causes mild hyperoxaluria.

Whether restricting meat protein alone has any protective value without restricting sodium as well is unknown. Most studies to date have found no difference in stone development between people with low and normal meat protein diets over four years. A 2000 study reported that only dramatic reductions in meat protein had any preventive effect against stone recurrence.

Although the precise role of dietary protein in kidney stones needs further clarification, it is reasonable for everyone to consume meat protein in moderation. People with struvite stones, who need to reduce phosphates in their diets, should also cut down on proteins.

Calcium from Foods. Dietary calcium recommendations for kidney stone prevention need to be determined on an individual basis. A doctor will suggest calcium guidelines based on a patient's age, gender, body size, and type of stone. Most studies indicate that dietary calcium (found in milk, yogurt, and cheese) protects against many types of calcium oxalate stones. Large studies of both men and women found that those with the highest intake of calcium from foods had a much lower risk for stones than those who had little calcium in their diets. A diet containing a normal amount of calcium, but reduced amounts of animal protein and salt, may protect against stones better than a low-calcium regimen. However, calcium metabolism changes as people age. Some studies suggest that a high calcium intake protects against kidney stones in men younger than age 60, but not in older men.

Dietary calcium may actually bind the oxalate in foods, preventing it from being absorbed into the blood and excreted into the urine. In a normal healthy diet, dairy products supply almost 80% of the daily calcium requirement. For people who have calcium stones associated with resorption (the breakdown of bone that releases calcium into the bloodstream), limiting calcium intake could cause further bone loss.

Calcium Supplements. Evidence on calcium supplements is mixed, although in general many studies suggest that they reduce oxalate levels and so help prevent calcium oxalate stones. One study suggested that taking 500 mg of calcium supplements a day regularly may "reprogram" the intestines to absorb less calcium and may therefore be protective. Experts generally agree that calcium supplementation within dosage recommendations (about 1,200 mg per day) remains safe. In one study, however, women who took calcium supplements had a 20% higher risk for stones. Research indicates that dosages of calcium above 2,000 mg per day are clearly associated with the formation of stones. Some experts speculate that this higher risk may occur because supplements are often taken in the morning, either without food or with breakfast, which is typically low in oxalates. Taking supplements with later meals may not produce the same risk.

Calcium Restriction in Certain Cases. Some patients, such as those whose stones are caused by genetic defects in which the intestine absorbs too much calcium, may need to limit calcium intake. More studies are needed to define this group precisely.

Fiber may be beneficial for people with kidney stones. In addition, some fiber-rich foods may contain compounds that help protect against kidney stones. A wide variety of high-fiber plant foods contain a compound called phytate (also called inositol hexaphosphate, InsP6, or IP6), which appears to help prevent crystallization of calcium salts, both oxalate and phosphate. Phytate is found in legumes and wheat and rice bran. (Soybeans are also rich in phytate but they are also very high in oxalates, so the overall effects of soy on kidney stones are not clear.)

A high intake of purines can increase the amount of uric acid in the urine. Those at risk for uric acid stones should reduce their intake of foods and beverages that contain purines. These include beer and other alcoholic beverages, anchovies, sardines, yeast, organ meats (such as liver and kidneys), legumes (including dried beans, peas, and soybeans), mushrooms, spinach, asparagus, cauliflower, and poultry.

Most people with calcium oxalate stones should not avoid oxalate-rich foods unless the doctor specifically recommends a restrictive diet. Oxalate binds with calcium in the intestine, which may actually reduce calcium absorption. Some studies, in fact, indicate that eating foods containing oxalates and calcium together may reduce the risk of stones. Most of the foods that contain oxalates are very important for good health. Limiting oxalates may be particularly harmful in people with bowel disorders marked by malabsorption.

Foods high in oxalic acid include beets, soy, beet tops, black tea, chenopodium, chocolate, cocoa, dried figs, ground pepper, lamb, lime peel, nuts, parsley, poppy seeds, purslane, rhubarb, sorrel, spinach, and Swiss chard.
Foods containing moderate amounts of oxalates include beans (green and wax), blackberries, blueberries, carrots, celery, coffee (roasted), concord grapes, currants, dandelion greens, endive, gooseberries, lemon peel, okra, green onions, oranges, green peppers, black raspberries, strawberries, and sweet potatoes.

Certain fats may play a beneficial or harmful role in specific cases of kidney stones.

Restricted Fats in Patients with Stones Associated with Bowel Disease. Patients who have stones associated with short-bowel syndrome should eat foods with lower amounts of fats and oxalates. If patients with short-bowel syndrome eat too much fat, calcium may bind to unabsorbed fat instead of to oxalates. This increased oxalate levels, resulting in increased risk of stone formation.

Fish Oil. Omega-3 fatty acids, found in oily fish like mackerel, salmon, and albacore tuna, have many health benefits, but the most current evidence suggests they do not help prevent kidney stones. A 2005 study of over 200,000 adults found that increased omega-3 fatty acid intake did not reduce kidney stone risk.

Vitamin B6. Vitamin B6, or pyridoxine, is used to treat people with primary hyperoxaluria, a severe inherited disorder. Patients should not try to treat themselves with vitamin B6. Very high doses (500 to 2,000 mg daily over long periods) can cause nerve damage, with loss of balance and numbness in the feet and hands. Food sources of vitamin B6 include meats, oily fish, poultry, whole grains, dried fortified cereals, soybeans, avocados, baked potatoes with skins, watermelon, plantains, bananas, peanuts, and brewer's yeast.

Vitamin C. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) may change in the body to tiny crystals, called oxalates. These crystals do not dissolve. People with hyperoxaluria (too much oxalate in the urine) should avoid vitamin C supplements. Even for men with normal oxalate levels, higher consumption of vitamin C (more than 1,000 mg a day) may increase kidney stone risk.

Magnesium and potassium may help reduce the risk for kidney stones in men.

Because of an association between stress and kidney stones, relaxation and stress management techniques may also be beneficial.

Dietary Considerations. People with kidney stones appear to be more sensitive to certain foods than people who do not form kidney stones. Therefore, vulnerable people should make specific changes in their diet. They should work with their doctors to develop a dietary plan that fits their individual situation. Drinking plenty of fluids is important for preventing recurrence of any kidney stone.

Indications for Drug Treatments. If dietary treatments fail, drug therapy may be helpful. A number of drugs are available to prevent recurrences of calcium oxalate and other stones. Medications that inhibit the formation of stones include allopurinol, thiazide, potassium citrate, and potassium-magnesium citrate. In addition, drug treatments can sometimes also help prevent other complications related to stones, such as osteoporosis.

Correcting Underlying Conditions Known to Cause Kidney Stones. It is also important to treat and correct, if possible, any underlying disorder that may be causing stones to form. Such disorders include distal renal tubular acidosis, hyperthyroidism, sarcoidosis, and certain cancers. To prevent calcium stones that form in hyperparathyroid patients, a surgeon may remove the affected parathyroid gland (located in the neck). In most cases, only one of the glands is enlarged. Removing it ends the patient's problem with kidney stones.

Resources

www.kidney.niddk.nih.gov -- National Kidney and Urologic Diseases Information Clearinghouse
www.urologyhealth.org -- American Urological Association
www.kidney.org -- National Kidney Foundation
www.ohf.org -- Oxalosis and Hyperoxaluria Foundation

References

Cameron MA, Maalouf NM, Adams-Huet B, Moe OW, Sakhaee K. Urine composition in type 2 diabetes: predisposition to uric Acid nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 May;17(5):1422-8. Epub 2006 Apr 5.

Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses' Health Study II. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(:885-891.

Finkielstein VA. Strategies for preventing calcium oxalate stones. CMAJ. 2006;174(10); 1407-1409.

Krambeck AE, Gettman MT, Rohlinger AL, Lohse CM, Patterson DE, Segura JW. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol. 2006;175(5):1742-7.

Sinha MK, Collazo-Clavell ML, Rule A, et al. Hyperoxaluric nephrolithiasis is a complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Kidney International. 2007;72:100-107.

Straub M, Hautmann RE. Developments in stone prevention. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15(2):119-126.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(12):3225-3232.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Fatty acid intake and incident nephrolithiasis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(2):267-274.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA. 2005;293(4):455-462.

Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2005 Sep;68(3):1230-5.

Wasserstein AG. Nephrolithiasis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 45(2);2005:422-28.

Review Date:
7/24/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Easter Candy Breakdown

FitSugar — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:00:00 -0700

Easter is this weekend and for many of you, it's a time of baskets filled with Cadbury Creme Eggs, marshmallow Peeps, and fruity jellybeans. This holiday is perfect for people with a super sweet tooth, but before you devour an entire chocolate bunny, check out the nutritional info for your favorite treats.

To see the breakdown read more.

Candy	Calories	Fat (g)	Carbs (g)	Sugar
4 Peeps Marshmallow Bunnies	130	0	33	29
1 Peeps Hollow Milk Chocolate Egg	420	24	54	52
5 Mars Mini Chocolate Eggs	179	10	20.4	17.6
1 Cadbury Solid Milk Chocolate Easter Bunny	890	48.6	101.2	97.1
1 Cadbury Creme Egg	150	5	25	22
12 Cadbury Chocolate Eggs	190	8	28	26
1 Dove Solid Chocolate Easter Bunny	230	13	25	24
1 Nestle's Crunch Solid Chocolate Easter Bunny	692	36.2	95.6	79.1
1 Snickers Cream Sports Egg	140	6	18	16
1 Reese's Peanut Butter Egg	180	10	18	16
1 Reese's Reester Bunny	798	42	88.2	75.6
1 Brachs Chocolate Covered Marshmallow Egg	43	1.3	7.8	6
5 Brachs Malted Easter Eggs	180	5	31	27
35 Jelly Belly Assorted Jellybeans	140	0	37	28

Source

Peptic ulcers

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:38 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Symptoms
Complications
Risk Factors
Diagnosis
Treatment
Treatment for NSAID-Induced...
Medications
Treatment for Bleeding Ulce...
Lifestyle Changes
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Risk with cardiovascular medications

While nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the major medications responsible for causing peptic ulcers, drugs taken for cardiovascular disease and its risk factors may also cause ulcers. Recent studies have found an association between increased risk of ulcer and the following drugs:

Spironolactone, a common diuretic used in heart failure
Niacin, a drug used to lower "bad" cholesterol and raise "good" cholesterol
Vitamin K antagonists, commonly prescribed anticoagulants
Dipyridamole, a drug for secondary stroke prevention
Low-dose aspirin, prescribed for both heart attack and stroke prevention

Risk of peptic ulcer increases dramatically when these drugs are used in combination. Considering the millions of people who take these medications to prevent a life-threatening cardiovascular event, their impact on peptic ulcer development could be monumental.

Atypical symptoms of GERD

The burning pain of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be confused with that of an ulcer. However, GERD pain typically develops after meals and is relieved by antacids. Elderly patients may have different symptoms that can include loss of appetite, weight loss, anemia, vomiting, or difficulty swallowing. A careful examination may be necessary to diagnose the underlying cause, since GERD and peptic ulcer may coexist.

Adjustments in triple therapy

Peptic ulcers are commonly treated with the triple combination of two antibiotics (amoxicillin and clarithromycin) and a proton-pump inhibitor. Therapy usually lasts for 2 weeks. Recent studies indicate that 1 week may be just as effective. In addition, taking the antibiotics in sequence, rather than at the same time, may work better to eliminate H. pylori, the bacteria responsible for most ulcers.

Healing foods

Milk may not be the ideal food for people with peptic ulcers because it encourages the production of stomach acid. However, certain qualities found in fermented milks and yogurts may actually offer protection against gastric ulcers. Likewise, the phenolic compounds found in virgin olive oil appear to kill many strains of H. pylori, including some that have become resistant to antibiotics. Vegetables contain dietary nitrate, which increases nitric oxide in the gut, causing the mucus layer to thicken. This increases protection against H. pylori invasion.

Protection when taking NSAIDs

People who take NSAIDs for pain control have an immediate increased risk of ulcers. Chronic use increases risk dramatically. Taking a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2 blocker is necessary to reduce this risk. A review of clinical trials found three PPIs [omeprazole (Prilosec), esomeprazole (Nexium), and lansoprazole (Prevacid)] to be more effective than the H2 blocker ranitidine (Zantac). When NSAIDs were discontinued, however, healing rates with ranitidine reached nearly 100%.

Introduction

A peptic ulcer is an open sore or raw area that tends to develop in one of two places:

The lining of the stomach ( gastric ulcer), or
The upper part of the small intestine -- the duodenum ( duodenal ulcers). In the U.S., duodenal ulcers are 3 times more common than gastric ulcers.

A peptic ulcer is an open sore or raw area in the lining of the stomach (gastric) or the upper part of the small intestine (duodenal).

Ulcers average between one-quarter and one-half inch in diameter. They develop when digestive juices produced in the stomach, intestines, and digestive glands damage the lining of the stomach or duodenum.

The two important digestive juices are hydrochloric acid and the enzyme pepsin. Both substances are critical in the breakdown and digestion of starches, fats, and proteins in food. They play different roles in ulcers:

Click the icon to see an image of the stomach.

Hydrochloric acid. A common misbelief is that excess hydrochloric acid, which is secreted in the stomach, is solely responsible for producing ulcers. Patients with duodenal ulcers do tend to have higher-than-normal levels of hydrochloric acid, but most patients with gastric ulcers have normal or lower-than-normal acid levels. Some stomach acid is important for protecting against H. pylori, the bacteria that causes most peptic ulcers. [Note: An exception is ulcers that occur in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. This is a rare genetic condition in which very high levels of gastrin, a potent acid, are secreted by tumors in the pancreas or duodenum.]
Pepsin. Pepsin is an enzyme that breaks down proteins in food. Since the stomach and duodenum are also composed of protein, they are also susceptible to the actions of pepsin. Pepsin is, then, also important in the formation of ulcers.

Fortunately, the body has a defense system to protect the stomach and intestine against these powerful substances:

The mucous layer, which coats the stomach and duodenum, forms the first line of defense.
Bicarbonate, which the mucous layer secretes, neutralizes the digestive acids.
Hormone-like substances called prostaglandins help dilate the blood vessels in the stomach to ensure good blood flow and protect against injury. Prostaglandins are also believed to stimulate bicarbonate and mucus production.

Disrupting any of these defense mechanisms makes the stomach and intestine lining susceptible to the actions of acid and pepsin, increasing the risk for ulcers.

Causes

Before the discovery of the bacterium Helicobacter (H.) pylori, the stomach was believed to be a sterile environment. However, in 1982 two Australian scientists identified H. pylori as the main cause of stomach ulcers. They showed that inflammation of the stomach and stomach ulcers result from an infection of the stomach caused by the H. pylori bacteria. This discovery was so important that the researchers were awarded the Nobel Price in Medicine in 2005. The bacteria appear to trigger ulcers in the following way:

H. pylori's corkscrew shape enables it to penetrate the mucous layer of the stomach or duodenum so it can attach itself to the lining.
It survives in the highly acidic environment by producing urease, an enzyme that generates ammonia to neutralize the acid.
H. pylori then produces a number of toxins and factors that can cause inflammation and damage to the lining, leading to ulcers in certain individuals.
It also alters certain immune factors that allow it to evade detection and cause persistent inflammation for a life -- even without invading the mucous membrane.

Even if ulcers do not develop, the bacterium is now considered to be a major cause of active chronic inflammation in the stomach (gastritis) and in the upper part of the small intestine (duodenitis).

It is also strongly linked to stomach (gastric) cancer and possibly other non-intestinal problems.

Factors that Trigger Ulcers in H. pylori Carriers.H. pylori is found in about 25% of people who do not have peptic ulcers. The magnitude of H. pylori infection, particularly in older people, may not always predict the presence or absence of peptic ulcers. Other variables must to be present to actually trigger ulcers. These may include:

Genetic Factors. Some people harbor genetic strains of H. pylori that may make the bacteria more dangerous and increase the risk for ulcers. The most intensively investigated genetic factor is cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), which has been associated with both gastric and duodenal ulcers, as well as with stomach cancer. Other genetic types that may also increase bacterial severity are called vacuolating cytotoxin (vacA) and antigen-binding adhesin (BabA) genotypes. Some of these genetic factors may be more or less important for development of ulcers, depending on ethnicity.
Immune Abnormalities. Some experts suggest that certain individuals have abnormalities in the immune response of the intestine, which allow the bacteria to injure the lining.
Lifestyle Factors. Although lifestyle factors such as chronic stress, drinking coffee, and smoking were long believed to be primary causes of ulcers, it is now thought they only increase susceptibility to ulcers in some H. pylori carriers.
Shift Work and Other Causes of Interrupted Sleep. People who work the night shift have a significantly higher incidence of ulcers than day workers. Researchers suspect that frequent interruptions of sleep may weaken the ability of the immune system to protect against endotoxins.

When H. pylori was first identified as the major cause of peptic ulcers, it was found in 90% of people with duodenal ulcers and in about 80% of people with gastric ulcers. As more people are being tested and treated for the bacteria, however, the rate of H. pylori- associated ulcers has declined. For example, a 2001 study suggested that about half of ulcers are not caused by H. pylori. Instead, they tend to be caused by regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which include aspirin and other common pain relievers. Genetic factors or, rarely, Crohn's disease or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, also cause ulcers.

Some researchers now believe that duodenal ulcers are not caused by H. pylori, but that the presence of the bacteria simply delays healing. This fact, they say, may explain why up to half of cases of acute duodenal perforation show no evidence of H. pylori, and why duodenal ulcers can recur even after H. pylori has been eradicated.

A 2006 study published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry indicates that a protein called decay-accelerating factor (DAF) acts as receptor for H. pylori. Animal studies show that blocking this interaction renders H. pylori harmless to the stomach. Researchers hope the discovery leads to new drugs that can reduce the risk of peptic ulcer.

Long-term use of NSAIDs is the second most common cause of ulcers, and the rate of NSAID-caused ulcers is increasing. About 20 million people take prescription NSAIDs regularly, and more than 25 billion tablets of over-the-counter brands are sold each year in the U.S. alone. The most common NSAIDs are aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), and naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn), although many others are available. Patients with NSAID-caused ulcers should stop taking these drugs.

There is no doubt NSAIDs increase the risk of ulcers and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The risk of bleeding is continuous for as long as a patient takes these drugs and may persist for about one year after stopping. Short courses of NSAIDs for temporary pain relief should not cause major problems, because the stomach has time to recover and repair any damage that has occurred.

Specific NSAIDs pose greater or lesser risks for ulcers and bleeding. No NSAIDs, however, even over-the-counter brands, should be used long-term except under a doctor's direction.

Lowest Risk

Medium Risk

Highest Risk

Nabumetone (Relafen)

Etodolac (Lodine)

Salsalate

Sulindac (Clinoril)

Aspirin. Even low-dose ("baby") aspirin (81 mg) may pose some risk

Ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, Nuprin, Rufen)

Naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn, Naprelan, Anaprox)

Diclofenac (Voltaren), Tolmetin (Tolectin)

NOTE: Drugs in the medium risk group vary in risk. For example, studies show that naproxen is twice as likely as ibuprofen to be associated with hospitalization from GI bleeding.

Flurbiprofen (Ansaid), Piroxicam (Feldene), Fenoprofen Indomethacin (Indocin), Meclofenamate (Meclomen)

Ketoprofen (Actron, Orudis KT). Note: Ketoprofen is often considered a medium-risk drug, but one study reported that taking the drug in low doses for as little as 1 week causes significant GI injury.

Certain drugs other than NSAIDs may cause or aggravate ulcers, particularly those taken for cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. A review of more than 306,000 primary care patients found that spironolactone, a common diuretic prescribed in heart failure, was associated with a 2.7% increased risk of ulcer or upper GI bleeding. Exacerbation of peptic ulcers is a rare but noted side effect of niacin, a drug that can reduce LDL cholesterol and raise HDL cholesterol. Low-dose aspirin, dipyridamole, and vitamin K antagonists such as Coumadin nearly double the risk of upper GI bleeding. When these drugs are used in combination, the risk soars.

Risk of GI perforation was seen in phase 3 clinical trials of bevacizumab, the first vascular endothelial growth factor agent (VEGF) approved by the FDA. This drug has been shown to increase survival and stop the progression of metastatic colorectal cancer when used in combination with chemotherapy. While the benefits of bevacizumab outweigh the risks, GI perforation is very serious. If it occurs, the drug must be discontinued.

The least common major cause of peptic ulcer disease is Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES).

Rarely, certain conditions may cause ulceration in the stomach or intestine, including:

Radiation treatments
Bacterial or viral infections
Alcohol abuse
Physical injury
Burns

What is ZES? Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is the least common major cause of peptic ulcer disease. In this condition, tumors in the pancreas and duodenum (gastrinomas) produce excessive amounts of gastrin, a hormone that stimulates gastric acid formation. These tumors are usually malignant, so proper and prompt management of the disease is essential.

Another cause of peptic ulcer, although far less common than H. pylori or NSAIDs, is Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. A large amount of excess acid is produced in response to the overproduction of the hormone gastrin, which in turn is caused by tumors on the pancreas or duodenum. These tumors are usually malignant, must be removed and acid production suppressed to relieve the recurrence of the ulcers.

Who Gets ZES? The incidence of ZES in the United States is estimated at 1 case per million people per year, and at 0.1 - 1% among patients with peptic ulcers. The mean age at onset is 45 - 50, and men are affected more often than women.

How Is ZES Diagnosed? ZES should be suspected in patients with ulcers who are not infected with H. pylori and have no history of NSAID use. Diarrhea may precede ulcer symptoms. Ulcers occurring in the second, third, or fourth portions of the duodenum or the jejunum (the middle section of the small intestine) are signs of ZES. GERD is more prevalent and often more severe in patients with ZES, and can be complicated by ulcerations and strictures of the esophagus.

How Is ZES Treated? Peptic ulcers associated with ZES are typically persistent and difficult to treat. Treatment consists of removing the tumors and suppressing acid with an intravenous proton-pump inhibitor (Protonix). Previously, removing the stomach was the only option.

Symptoms

Dyspepsia. The most common symptoms of peptic ulcer are known collectively as dyspepsia. Peptic ulcers can occur without dyspepsia or any other gastrointestinal symptom, especially when caused by NSAIDs. Dyspepsia may be persistent or recurrent and can encompass a variety of symptoms in the upper abdomen, including:

Pain or discomfort
Bloating
A feeling of fullness. People with severe dyspepsia are unable to drink as much fluid as people with mild or no dyspepsia.
Hunger and an empty feeling in the stomach, often 1 - 3 hours after a meal
Mild nausea (Vomiting, in fact, may relieve symptoms.)
Regurgitation (sensation of acid backing up into the throat.)
Belching

Ulcer Pain. The pain of ulcers can be either localized in one place or diffuse. The pain is described as a burning, gnawing, or aching in the upper abdomen, or as a stabbing pain penetrating through the gut. The symptoms may vary depending on the location of the ulcer:

Duodenal ulcers often cause a gnawing pain in the upper stomach area several hours after a meal, and the pain is often relieved by eating a meal.
Gastric ulcers may cause a dull, aching pain, often right after a meal; eating does not relieve the pain and may even worsen it. Pain may also occur at night.

Ulcer pain may be particularly confusing or disconcerting when it radiates to the back or to the chest behind the breastbone. In such cases it can be confused with other conditions such as heart attack.

Because ulcers can cause hidden bleeding, patients may experience the symptoms of anemia, including fatigue and shortness of breath.

A sudden onset of severe symptoms may indicate intestinal obstruction, perforation, or hemorrhage, all of which are emergencies. Symptoms may include:

Tarry, black, or bloody stools
Severe vomiting, which may include blood or a substance with the appearance of coffee grounds (a sign of a serious hemorrhage) or entire stomach contents (sign of intestinal obstruction)
Severe abdominal pain with or without vomiting or evidence of blood

Anyone who experiences any of these symptoms should go to the emergency room immediately.

Peptic ulcers may lead to emergency situations. Severe abdominal pain with or without evidence of bleeding may indicate a perforation of the ulcer through the stomach or duodenum. Vomiting of a substance that resembles coffee grounds or the presence of black tarry stools may indicate serious bleeding.

Complications

Most people with severe ulcers experience significant pain and sleeplessness, which can have a dramatic and adverse impact on their quality of life.

Peptic ulcers caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs can be very serious if they hemorrhage or perforate the stomach or duodenum. Up to 15% of people with ulcers experience some degree of bleeding, which can be life-threatening. Ulcers that form where the small intestine joins the stomach can swell and scar, resulting in a narrowing or closing of the intestinal opening. In such cases, the patient will vomit the entire contents of the stomach, and emergency treatment is necessary.

Complications of peptic ulcers cause an estimated 6,500 deaths each year. These figures, however, do not reflect the high number of deaths associated with NSAID use. Ulcers caused by NSAIDs are more likely to bleed than those caused by H. pylori. NSAID-related bleeding and stomach problems may be responsible for as many as 107,000 hospital admissions and 16,500 deaths each year.

Because there are usually no GI symptoms from NSAID ulcers until bleeding begins, doctors cannot predict which patients taking these drugs will develop bleeding. The risk for a poor outcome is highest in people who have had long-term bleeding from NSAIDs, blood clotting disorders, low systolic blood pressure, mental instability, or the presence of another serious, unstable medical condition. Populations at greatest risk are the elderly and those with other serious conditions, such as heart problems.

H. pylori is strongly associated with certain cancers. Some studies have also linked it to a number of non-gastrointestinal illnesses as well, although the evidence is inconsistent.

Stomach Cancers. Stomach cancer, also called gastric cancer, is the second most common cause of cancer worldwide. In developing countries where the rate of H. pylori is very high, the risk of stomach cancer is 6 times higher than in the U.S. An important 2001 study strongly supported previous work that found a causal link between H. pylori infection and stomach cancer. In this study, uninfected people did not develop stomach cancer. However, the stomach cancer rates for H. pylori-associated conditions were 4.7% for nonulcer dyspepsia, 3.4% for gastric ulcers, and 2.2% of stomach polyps. Experts now suggest that H. pylori may be as carcinogenic to the stomach as cigarette smoke is to the lungs.

Eradication of H. pylori may reduce the risk of stomach cancer, but not eliminate it. A Japanese study found that continued risk is associated with degree of mucosal atrophy before H. pylori eradication therapy is started. This is something than can be measured during an endoscopy.

The process most likely starts in childhood. Infection with H. pylori promotes a precancerous condition called atrophic gastritis. This may lead to cancer through the following steps:

The stomach becomes chronically inflamed and loses patches of glands that secrete protein and acid.
Acid protects against carcinogens, substances that cause cancerous changes in cells.
New cells replace destroyed cells, but the new cells do not produce enough acid to protect against carcinogens.
Over time, cancer cells may develop and proliferate in the stomach.

Onset of H. pylori infection in adulthood poses a lower risk, since the development of atrophic gastritis takes years, and an adult is likely to die of other causes first. Other factors, such as specific genetic strains and diets, might also influence a higher risk for stomach cancer. For example, a diet high in salt and low in fresh fruits and vegetables has been associated with a greater risk. Some evidence suggests that the virulent H. pylori strain called cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) may also be a particular risk factor for precancerous changes.

Interestingly, people with duodenal ulcers caused by H. pylori appear to have a lower risk of stomach cancer, although scientists do not know why. It may be that different H. pylori strains affect the duodenum and the stomach. Or, the high levels of acid found in the duodenum may help prevent the spread of the bacteria to critical areas of the stomach.

Pancreatic Cancer. H. pylori has recently been linked to pancreatic cancer. The excess risk is high in patients with unoperated gastric ulcers -- 20% after 15 years and 50% after the first hospitalization. Surgery decreased the risk dramatically. Unoperated duodenal ulcers, on the other hand, were not associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

Heart Disease. Some research has reported a very high rate of H. pylori infection in men with coronary artery disease, but more recent work has found no relationship between the bacteria and heart disease. A 2001 study suggested that the only relationship between H. pylori and heart disease may be that people with both tend to be in lower socioeconomic groups. Further studies are needed.

Other Diseases. H. pylori has also been weakly associated with other nonintestinal disorders, including migraine, Raynaud's disease (marked by cold extremities), and some skin disorders, such as chronic hives.

Risk Factors

About 25 million people in the U.S. are expected to develop peptic ulcers at some point in their lives. Peptic ulcer disease affects all age groups, but is rare in children. Men have twice the risk of ulcers as women. The risk of duodenal ulcers tends to rise beginning around age 25 and continues until age 75; gastric ulcers peak at age 55 - 65.

Peptic ulcers are less common than they once were. Research suggests that ulcer rates have even declined in areas with widespread H. pylori infection. The increased use of proton-pump inhibitor drugs may be responsible for this trend.

H. pylori grows and colonizes only in the intestinal tracts of primates. The bacteria are most likely transmitted directly from person to person. Still, little is yet known about its transmission.

Who Is Infected with H. pylori? About half the world's adults are infected with H. pylori. The bacteria are nearly always acquired during childhood and persist throughout life, if not treated. The prevalence in children ranges from less than 10% to more than 80%, with the highest infection rates (3 - 10%) in developing countries and the lowest (0.5%) in industrialized nations, where rates continue to decline. Even in industrialized countries, however, infection rates in regions with crowded, unsanitary conditions are equal to those in developing countries.

How Does the Bacteria Pass from Person to Person? It is not entirely clear how the bacteria are transmitted. One study did not find that infected students posed any risk for their classmates. Transmission within families may be the most important route for H. pylori. A 2002 study reported that spouses of people with peptic ulcers are at significantly higher risk for ulcers, suggesting that the bacteria may be transmitted during intimate contact. Some evidence suggests that bacteria may spread during GI tract illness, particularly when vomiting occurs. The bacteria also may be passed in stools. Since H. pylori can live in water, but not apparently in food, the bacteria may also be transmitting through sewage-contaminated water.

Who Is at Risk for Ulcers from H. pylori? Although H. pylori infection is common, ulcers in children are very rare, and only a minority of infected adults develops ulcers. Some known risk factors include smoking, alcohol use, having a relative with peptic ulcers, being male, and the presence of the cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA). Experts are unable to determine, however, any single factor or group of factors that can determine which infected patients are most likely to develop ulcers.

Between 15 - 25% of patients who have taken NSAIDs regularly will have evidence of one or more ulcers, but in most cases these ulcers are very small. Given the widespread use of NSAIDs, however, the potential total number of people who can develop serious problems may be very large. Long-term NSAID use can damage the stomach and, possibly, the small intestine.

In April 2005, the FDA asked manufacturers of prescription NSAIDs to include with their products the same boxed warning used for the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex). This boxed warning emphasizes the increased risk for cardiovascular events and GI bleeding in people taking these drugs. (Pharmaceutical companies are trying to develop new COX-2 inhibitors without these dangerous side effects. Early safety studies of the novel COX-2 inhibitor known as CS-706 showed its effect on gastric mucosa to be the same as placebo.)

The FDA also requested manufacturers of over-the-counter NSAIDs to revise their labels to include more specific language concerning potential cardiovascular and GI risks. Due to its proven heart benefits, aspirin was excluded from these labeling revisions.

Frequent Users of NSAIDs. Anyone who uses NSAIDs regularly is at risk for gastrointestinal problems. Even low-dose aspirin (81 mg) may pose some risk, although the risk is lower than with standard doses. In one 4-year study, 4.5% of regular NSAID users were hospitalized for GI bleeding. The highest risk, however, was found in people who require long-term use of very high-dose NSAIDs, notably patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Other people who take high doses of NSAIDs include those with chronic low back pain, fibromyalgia, and chronic stress.

Contributing Factors. Certain factors add to the risk for ulcers in NSAID-users:

Age 65 and older
History of peptic ulcers or upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Other serious ailments, such as congestive heart failure
Use of other medications, such as the anticoagulant warfarin (Coumadin), corticosteroids, or the osteoporosis drug alendronate (Fosamax)
Alcohol abuse
Those infected with H. pylori. A 2002 study reported that the combination of NSAID use and H. pylori posed a 3.5-fold greater risk of ulcers than either factor alone. However, not all studies have reported the higher risk in infected patients.

Stress and Psychological Factors. Although stress is no longer considered a cause of ulcers, studies still suggest that stress may predispose a person to ulcers or prevent existing ulcers from healing. Some experts estimate that social and psychological factors play a contributory role in 30 - 60% of peptic ulcer cases, whether they are caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs. Some experts even believe that the anecdotal relationship between stress and ulcers is so strong that treatment of psychological factors is warranted.

Smoking. Smoking increases acid secretion, reduces prostaglandin and bicarbonate production, and decreases mucosal blood flow. Results of studies on the actual effect of smoking on ulcers, however, are mixed. Some evidence suggests that smoking delays the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers. One study reported that after ulcers healed, about half of nonsmokers experienced a relapse of their ulcer disease after 1 year, but that all heavy smokers relapsed after 3 months. Other studies have found no increased risk for ulcers in smokers. In any case, any impact of smoking on ulcers does not seem to be affected by the presence of H. pylori.

Tobacco use and exposure may cause an acceleration of coronary artery disease and peptic ulcer disease. It is also linked to reproductive disturbances, esophageal reflux, hypertension, fetal illness and death, and delayed wound healing.

Diagnosis

Peptic ulcers are always suspected in patients with persistent dyspepsia (bloating, belching, and abdominal pain). Dyspepsia, however, occurs in 20 - 40% of people who live in industrialized nations, and only about 15 - 25% of these people actually have ulcers. A number of steps are needed to make an accurate diagnosis of ulcers.

The doctor will ask for a thorough report of a patient's dyspepsia and other important symptoms, such as weight loss or fatigue, present and past medication use (especially chronic use of NSAIDs), family members with ulcers, and drinking and smoking habits.

In addition to peptic ulcers, a number of conditions, notably gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and irritable bowel syndrome, cause dyspepsia. Often, however, no cause can be determined. In such cases, the symptoms are referred to collectively as functional dyspepsia.

Peptic ulcer symptoms, particularly abdominal pain and chest pain, may resemble those of other conditions, such as gallstones or heart attack. Certain features may help to distinguish these different conditions. However, symptoms often overlap, and it is impossible to make a diagnosis based on symptoms alone. A number of tests are needed.

The following disorders may be confused with peptic ulcers:

GERD. About half of patients with GERD also have dyspepsia. With GERD or other problems in the esophagus, the main symptom is usually heartburn, a burning pain that radiates up to the throat. It typically develops after meals and is relieved by antacids. The patient may have difficulty swallowing and may experience regurgitation or acid reflux. Elderly patients with GERD are less likely to have these symptoms, but instead may experience loss of appetite, weight loss, anemia, vomiting, or dysphagia (difficulty or painful swallowing). [See In-Depth Report #85: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.]
Heart Events. Cardiac pain, such as angina or a heart attack, is more likely to occur with exercise and may radiate to the neck, jaw, or arms. In addition, patients typically have distinct risk factors for heart disease, such as a family history, smoking, high blood pressure, obesity, or high cholesterol. [See In-Depth Report #12: Heart Attack.]
Gallstones. The primary symptom in gallstones is typically a steady gripping or gnawing pain on the right side under the rib cage, which can be quite severe and can radiate to the upper back. Some patients experience pain behind the breastbone. The pain is often precipitated by a fatty or heavy meal, but gallstones almost never cause dyspepsia. [See In-Depth Report #10: Gallstones and Gallbladder Disease.]
Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Irritable bowel syndrome can cause dyspepsia, nausea and vomiting, bloating, and abdominal pain. It occurs more often in women than in men.

Dyspepsia may also occur with gastritis, stomach cancer, or as a side effect of certain drugs, including NSAIDs, antibiotics, iron, corticosteroids, theophylline, and calcium blockers.

When ulcers are suspected, the doctor will prescribe tests to detect bleeding. These may include a rectal exam, a complete blood count, and a fecal occult blood test (FOBT). The FOBT tests for hidden (occult) blood in stools. Typically, the patient is asked to supply up to 6 stool specimens in a specially prepared package. A small quantity of feces is smeared on treated paper, which reacts to hydrogen peroxide. If blood is present, the paper turns blue.

Traditional radiology tests have not yet proven valuable for diagnosing ulcers. However, radiologists in France who performed multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans on preoperative patients with proven GI perforations found the technology to be highly accurate in pinpointing the location of the perforations.

Simple blood, breath, and stool tests can now detect H. pylori with a fairly high degree of accuracy. It is not entirely clear, however, which individuals should be screened for H. pylori.

Candidates for Screening. Some doctors currently test for H. pylori only in individuals with dyspepsia who also have high-risk conditions, such as:

Strong indication for ulcers, such as weight loss, anemia, or indications of bleeding
History of active ulcers
Risk factors for stomach cancer or other complications from ulcers

Smokers and those who experience regular and persistent pain on an empty stomach may also be good candidates for screening tests. Some doctors argue that testing for H. pylori may be beneficial for patients with dyspepsia who are regular NSAID users. In fact, given the possible risk for stomach cancer in H. pylori- infected people with dyspepsia, some experts now recommend that any patient with dyspepsia lasting longer than 4 weeks should have a blood test for H. pylori. This is a subject of considerable debate, however.

Specific Screening Tests for H. pylori. The following screening tests used or under investigation for H. pylori:

Breath Test. A simple test called the carbon isotope-urea breath test (UBT) can identify up to 99% of people who harbor H. pylori. Up to 2 weeks before the test, the patient must discontinue taking any antibiotics, bismuth-containing agents such as Pepto-Bismol, and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). As part of the test, the patient swallows a special substance containing urea (a compound in mammals metabolized from nitrogen) that has been treated with carbon atoms. If H. pylori is present, the bacteria convert the urea into carbon dioxide, which is detected and recorded in the patient's exhaled breath after 10 minutes.
Blood Tests. Blood tests are used to measure antibodies to H. pylori, with results available in minutes. Diagnostic accuracy is reported at 80 - 90%. One such important test is called enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An ELISA test of the urine is also showing promise in children.
Stool Test. A test to detect genetic fingerprints of H. pylori in the feces appears to be as accurate as the breath test for initial detection of the bacteria and for detecting recurrences after antibiotic therapy.

It should be noted that such tests are not as accurate as endoscopy, an invasive procedure, which is needed to confirm a diagnosis of H. pylori. The breath and stool tests, however, can be particularly useful after treatment to determine if a patient has been cured.

Test and Treat. Depending on the results of the screening tests, some doctors take the following steps:

Approach for Noninfected Individuals. People who do not have evidence of H. pylori on a blood or breath test are typically given a 4-week course of acid-suppressing medication, usually a PPI such as omeprazole (Prilosec).
Approach for H. pylori-Infected Individuals. Patients with evidence of bacterial infection are given antibiotics. If this does not relieve symptoms, they are given a 6-week course of the PPI omeprazole (Prilosec). (Whether to give antibiotics to infected patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia is controversial and is discussed in the section, What Are the Guidelines for Treating Peptic Ulcers Caused by H. pylori?)

If symptoms persist, endoscopy is usually performed. Endoscopy is an invasive procedure, but is the only procedure in which a biopsy of stomach tissue can be taken, making it the most accurate test.

Experts debate whether endoscopy should be performed on all patients who do not respond to initial medication, since it does not appear to add any useful information on treatment choices, unless there is evidence or suspicion of bleeding or serious complications.

While endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing upper GI disorders, because it allows doctors to biopsy the stomach, 3-dimensional CT imaging may also be valuable. Researchers in China compared the results of endoscopy to the results of noninvasive CT imaging performed to diagnose GI disease. They found that the CT imaging correctly diagnosed 50 of 52 cases, including 5 cases of peptic ulcer disease. Three-dimensional CT imaging clearly showed the GI tract lesions. It is currently considered a valuable complement to endoscopy.

Endoscopy is a procedure used to evaluate the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum using a long, thin tube tipped with a tiny video camera (endoscope). When combined with biopsy, endoscopy is the most accurate procedure for detecting the presence of peptic ulcers, bleeding, and stomach cancer, or for confirming the presence of H. pylori.

Appropriate Candidates for Endoscopy. Because endoscopy is invasive and expensive, it is unsuitable for screening everyone with dyspepsia. Most individuals with these symptoms are managed effectively without endoscopy. Endoscopy is usually reserved for patients with dyspepsia who also have risk factors for ulcers, stomach cancer, or both. Such factors include the following:

Having so-called "alarm" symptoms (unexplained weight loss, gastrointestinal bleeding, vomiting, difficulty swallowing, or anemia).
Being over 45 (when the risk for stomach cancer increases).

There is some debate whether patients under 45 with persistent dyspepsia and no alarm symptoms should have endoscopy.

The Procedure. Endoscopy may be performed in a hospital, doctor's office, or outpatient surgery center, and typically involves the following:

The doctor administers a local anesthetic using an oral spray and an intravenous sedative to suppress the gag reflex and relax the patient.
The doctor then places the thin, flexible plastic tube into the patient's mouth and down the esophagus into the stomach.
A tiny camera in the endoscope allows the doctor to see the surface of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, and to search for abnormalities.
The doctor will remove about 10 small tissue samples (biopsies), which will be tested for H. pylori.

In endoscopy, the doctor places a long, thin, flexible tube (called an endoscope) down the patient's throat and into the stomach and duodenum. A camera and light on the tip of the endoscope enables the doctor to check for abnormalities. Tiny samples may be taken to check for H. pylori bacteria, a cause of many peptic ulcers. If a bleeding ulcer is found, it may be sealed with a burning tool (cauterized) during the procedure.

Note: Some evidence suggests that patients who take PPIs should stop taking the medication 2 weeks before an endoscopy, since it may mask ulcers.

Capsule Endoscopy.Capsule endoscopy involves swallowing a capsule the size of a large vitamin, which contains tiny camera, light source, and radio transmitter. The device takes pictures as it passes through the intestinal tract. At this point, its benefits are limited to the small intestine, so it is unlikely to play a role in the diagnosis of peptic or gastric ulcers. However, capsule endoscopy has the potential to be an important tool for the diagnosis of obscure upper GI bleeding. Patients who have used it have usually found it painless and preferable to conventional endoscopy.

An upper GI (gastrointestinal) series was the standard diagnostic method for peptic ulcers until the introduction of adequate tests for detecting H. pylori. In an upper GI series, the patient drinks a solution containing barium. X-rays are then taken, which may reveal inflammation, active ulcer craters, or deformities and scarring due to previous ulcers. Endoscopy is more accurate, although it is more invasive and expensive.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing treatment of GI bleeding.

Stool tests may show traces of blood that are not visible to the naked eye, and blood tests may reveal anemia in those who have bleeding ulcers. If Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is suspected, blood levels of gastrin should be measured.

Treatment

Antibiotic regimens that eradicate H. pylori can cure peptic ulcers and are now the standard medications used for ulcers in infected individuals who are not taking NSAIDs. Eliminating H. pylori can also cure the rare MALT lymphomas caused by this bacterium. Other drugs, such as proton-pump inhibitors or H2 blockers, are useful for relieving ulcer symptoms.

Patients with Clear Evidence of Ulcers. Antibiotics are clearly indicated for patients who have both ulcers and H. pylori infection. Despite such clear indications, however, European and American studies continue to suggest that many doctors only treat symptoms and not the ulcers themselves. Studies also suggest that most doctors do not counsel patients on the potential dangers of NSAIDs and other drugs that can cause ulcers.

There is considerable debate about whether to test for H. pylori and treat infected patients who have dyspepsia, but no evidence of ulcers.

The best approach for treating dyspepsia is highly controversial. Options include the following:

Test and Treat. This approach involves testing for H. pylori and eradicating the bacteria in infected patients.
Prescribing potent acid-suppressing agents. This approach generally employs a trial of potent acid-suppressing drugs called proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as omeprazole (Prilosec) or esomeprazole (Nexium).

In either case, endoscopy is usually performed if symptoms persist after 4 weeks. Some evidence suggests that PPIs may mask ulcers, so patients taking these drugs may need to discontinue them for 2 weeks before endoscopy.

Arguments for Testing and Treating Patients with Dyspepsia. The argument supporting testing and treating patients with nonulcer dyspepsia is as follows:

Protection against ulcers. Some evidence suggests that antibiotic treatments for infected patients with dyspepsia may prevent ulcers from developing. A 2002 study found that antibiotic regimens to eradicate H. pylori greatly decreased the likelihood of ulcers in infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia who were chronic NSAID users.
Protection against gastric cancer. Some evidence suggests that eradicating H. pylori may prevent or delay the onset of stomach cancer in people with long-term dyspepsia who are infected with the bacteria. A large 2001 study conducted in Japan, where gastric cancer is especially common, found that such cancers developed in about 3% of infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. However, none occurred in dyspeptic patients who were treated with antibiotics for H. pylori.

Arguments against Testing and Treating Patients with Dyspepsia. The arguments against testing and treating are as follows:

Lack of significant effect on symptoms. Studies are mixed on whether antibiotics have much effect on dyspepsia symptoms. In a 2003 study, overall symptom scores after 1 year were not significantly different between dyspeptic patients who were treated for H. pylori and patients who were maintained on PPIs.
Lower rates of H. pylori in the U.S. The number of people with H. pylori infection is declining in the U.S., possibly making the test-and-treat approach too expensive for the number of people it helps.
Increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A number of studies suggest that H. pylori in the intestinal tract protects against GERD, which in severe cases can be a risk factor for cancer of the esophagus. Eliminating H. pylori may also have other adverse effects.
Overuse of antibiotics. Concern that such treatments without clear evidence of ulcers will lead to unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, increasing the risk for side effects. Overuse may also contribute to a growing public health problem -- the emergence of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics.

The standard treatment regimen for H. pylori uses 2 antibiotics and a PPI. Cure rates after antibiotic treatment range from 70 - 90%. A typical regimen contains three drugs:

A PPI. These drugs include omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), esomeprazole (Nexium), and rabeprazole (Aciphex). PPIs are important for all types of peptic ulcers, and are a critical partner in antibiotic regimens. They reduce acidity in the intestinal tract, and increase the ability of antibiotics to destroy H. pylori.
Two antibiotics. The standard antibiotics are clarithromycin (Biaxin) and amoxicillin. Some doctors substitute the antibiotic metronidazole (Flagyl) for either clarithromycin or amoxicillin.

This combination treatment is typically taken for at least 14 days. Many studies, however, suggest that a 7-day treatment may work just as well. A report published in 2006 evaluated a shorter course of treatment using the PPI rabeprazole and 2 antibiotics. They found that a 4-day treatment eliminated H. pylori and was associated with fewer side effects. A study published in 2007 comparing 1- and 2-week treatments with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and omeprazole for H. pylori eradication found both regimens to be similar in efficacy, safety, and compliance.

Interestingly, an Italian study indicated that giving antibiotics sequentially instead of at the same time may be even more effective. The researchers found that patients who took amoxicillin for 5 days, followed by clarithromycin for 5 days, had higher H. pylori eradication rates (89%) than those who took both antibiotics for 10 days (77%).

A 2007 study showed that eradication rates with this 3-drug regimen could be improved, and side effects reduced, by adding probiotics ("good" bacteria) and the milk protein bovine lactoferrin. These products are often found in yogurts and other forms of fermented milk.

Follow-Up. Follow-up testing for the bacteria should be done no sooner than 4 weeks after therapy is completed. Test results before that time may not be accurate.

In most cases, drug treatment relieves ulcer symptoms. However, symptom relief does not always indicate success, nor does persistence of dyspepsia necessarily mean that treatment has failed. Heartburn and other symptoms from GERD, for example, can worsen and require acid-suppressing medication.

Failure. Treatment fails in about 15% of patients, mostly when they fail to adhere to the regimen. Compliance with standard antibiotic regimens may be poor for the following reasons:

The triple-drug regimens are complicated and require many pills. Helicide or two-drug combinations may help offset this problem.
About 30% of patients suffer side effects from the H. pylori regimen. Gastrointestinal problems are very common, and severe diarrhea can occur.

Treatment may also fail if the patients harbor strains of H. pylori that are resistant to the antibiotics. When this happens, different drugs are tried.

Reinfection after Successful Treatment. Studies in developed countries indicate that once the bacteria are eliminated, recurrence rates are below 1% per year. Reinfection with the bacteria is possible, however, in areas where the incidence of H. pylori is very high and sanitary conditions are poor. In such regions, reinfection rates are 6 - 15%.

Weight Gain. Some patients may gain weight.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Of ongoing interest are reports of a lower incidence of H. pylori in patients with GERD. There are some important unanswered questions associated with this issue:

Is the lower incidence of H. pylori in GERD patients significant, and does the bacteria actually protect against GERD? Studies have not conclusively found any significant risk for GERD in people who are not infected with H. pylori, except possibly in certain regions. In a 2003 study, the absence of H. pylori infection in people with GERD was more pronounced in Asian patients than in those from Europe and North America. That being said, guidelines for eradication of H. pylori infection published in 2007 by the European Helicobacter Study Group state that "Eradication of H. pylori infection does not cause gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or exacerbate GERD, and may prevent peptic ulcer in patients who are naive users of NSAIDs."
Does eliminating the bacteria with antibiotic therapy actually produce GERD in some people? One study observed that patients cured of H. pylori infection were twice as likely to develop GERD as those who remained infected. However, a 2003 analysis of 8 studies reported no higher risk for GERD after antibiotic treatments. In addition, GERD patients did not experience worsening of symptoms. Longer follow-up studies are needed however to determine the long-term consequences, if any.
What is the proper management of people who have GERD and H. pylori infection? Patients with severe GERD usually require on-going therapy with PPIs, which are powerful acid-suppressors. Some evidence suggests that in such patients, the combination of H. pylori and chronic acid suppression may lead to atrophic gastritis, a precancerous condition in the stomach. Guidelines then advocate eliminating the bacteria with antibiotics. There is some concern that once the bacteria are eliminated, however, GERD may worsen, which can pose a risk for Barrett's esophagus, which is also a precancerous condition. On the encouraging side, however, evidence to date does not suggest any higher risk for more serious GERD complications after H. pylori is eliminated.

Effects on Other Gastrointestinal Infections. In children, there is some evidence that H. pylori protects against E. coli and other GI infections, particularly those that cause diarrhea. If this is true, treating infected children for H. pylori should be done only if the bacteria are causing harm.

Click the icon to see an animation on ulcer treatment.

Treatment for NSAID-Induced Ulcers

Preventing Ulcers or Rebleeding Caused by NSAIDs. If NSAID-caused ulcers or bleeding are identified, patients should:

Get tested for H. pylori and, if they are infected, take antibiotics.
Possibly use a PPI. Studies suggest these medications lower the risk for NSAID-caused ulcers, although they do not completely prevent them.

People who still need to take NSAIDs should:

Use the lowest NSAID dose possible.
Try the prescription drugs misoprostol (Cytotec) or Arthrotec. Misoprostol works as well as a PPI, however, it has many side effects. Arthrotec is a combination of misoprostol and the NSAID diclofenac.

A warning to women: misoprostol can induce labor at any stage of pregnancy. Pregnant women should not use the drug.

Healing Existing Ulcers. A number of drugs are used to treat NSAID-caused ulcers. PPIs -- omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), or esomeprazole (Nexium) -- are used most often. Other drugs that may be useful include H2 blockers, such as famotidine (Pepcid AC), cimetidine (Tagamet), and ranitidine (Zantac). Sucralfate is another drug used to heal ulcers and reduce the stomach upset caused by NSAIDs.

COX-2 Inhibitors (Coxibs). Coxibs block an inflammation-promoting enzyme called COX-2. This drug class was initially thought to work as well as NSAIDs, while causing less gastrointestinal distress. However, following numerous reports of cardiovascular events, the FDA banned rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) from use in the U.S. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is still available, but patients should discuss with their doctor whether this drug is appropriate and safe for them.

Arthrotec. Arthrotec is a combination of misoprostol and the NSAID diclofenac. It may reduce the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. One study found that patients taking Arthrotec had 65 - 80% fewer ulcers than those who took NSAIDs alone.

Acetaminophen. Acetaminophen (Tylenol, Anacin-3) is the most common alternative to NSAIDs. Acetaminophen is inexpensive and generally safe. It poses far less of a risk of gastrointestinal problems than NSAIDs. It does have some adverse effects, however, and the daily dose should not exceed 4 grams (4,000 mg); some studies suggest that ulcer risk is increased even in doses exceeding 2 grams (2,000 mg) a day, if the drug is used on a long-term basis. Patients who take high doses of acetaminophen for long periods are also at risk for liver damage, particularly if they drink alcohol. It may pose a small risk for serious kidney complications in people with preexisting kidney disease, although acetaminophen remains the drug of choice for patients with impaired kidney function.

Tramadol. Tramadol (Ultram) is a pain reliever that has been used as an alternative to opioids. It has opioid-like properties, but is not as addictive. However, dependence and abuse have been reported. It can cause nausea, but does not cause severe gastrointestinal problems, as NSAIDs can. Some patients experience severe itching. A combination of tramadol and acetaminophen (Ultracet) provides more rapid pain relief than tramadol alone and more durable relief than acetaminophen alone. Side effects are the same as for each of these agents.

Medications

The following drugs are sometimes used in the treatments of peptic ulcers caused by either NSAIDs or H. pylori. They are described in alphabetical order.

Many antacids are available without prescription and are the first drugs recommended to relieve heartburn and mild dyspepsia. They play no major role in either the prevention or healing of ulcers, but help in the following ways:

All rely on various combinations of three basic compounds -- magnesium, calcium, or aluminum -- to neutralize stomach acid.
They may defend the stomach by increasing acid-buffering bicarbonate and mucus secretion.

It is generally believed that liquid antacids work faster and are more potent than tablets, although some evidence suggests that both forms work equally well.

Basic Salts Used in Antacids. There are three basic salts used in antacids:

Magnesium. Magnesium compounds are available in the form of magnesium carbonate, magnesium trisilicate, and, most commonly, magnesium hydroxide (Milk of Magnesia). The major side effect of these magnesium compounds is diarrhea.
Calcium. Calcium carbonate (Tums, Titralac, and Alka-2) is a potent and rapid-acting antacid, but it can cause constipation. There have been rare cases of hypercalcemia (elevated levels of calcium in the blood) in people taking calcium carbonate for long periods of time. Hypercalcemia can lead to kidney failure.
Aluminum. The most common side effect of antacids containing aluminum compounds (Amphogel, Alternagel) is constipation. Maalox and Mylanta are combinations of aluminum and magnesium, which balance the side effects of diarrhea and constipation. People who take large amounts of antacids containing aluminum may be at risk for calcium loss and osteoporosis. Long-term use also increases the risk of kidney stones. People who have recently experienced GI bleeding should not use aluminum compounds.

Interactions with Other Drugs. Antacids can reduce the absorption of a number of drugs. Conversely, some antacids increase the potency of certain drugs. The interactions can be avoided by taking these other drugs 1 hour before or 3 hours after taking the antacid.

Drugs that are absorbed less well if taken with antacids

Drugs that are made more potent by antacids

Tetracycline

Ciprofloxacin (Cipro)

Propranolol (Inderal)

Captopril (Capoten)

Ranitidine (Zantac)

Famotidine (Pepcid AC)

Valproic acid

Sulfonylureas

Quinidine

Levodopa

H. pylori is usually highly sensitive to certain antibiotics, particularly amoxicillin, and to antibiotics in the macrolide class, such as clarithromycin. Either type of agent serves effectively as a second antibiotic in a three-drug regimen. Other antibiotics that are sometimes used include tetracycline, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin.

Amoxicillin is the most common form of penicillin. It is inexpensive, but many people are allergic to it.
Clarithromycin (Biaxin) is a macrolide and is the most expensive antibiotic used against H. pylori. It is very effective, but there is growing bacterial resistance to this drug. Resistance rates tend to be higher in women and increase with age. Researchers fear that resistance will increase as more people use the drug.
Tetracycline is effective, but this medicine has unique side effects, including skin reactions to sunlight, possible burning in the throat, and tooth discoloration. Pregnant women cannot take tetracycline.
Ciprofloxacin (Cipro), a fluoroquinolone, is also sometimes used in ulcer regimens.
Metronidazole (Flagyl) was the mainstay in initial combination regimens for H. pylori. As with clarithromycin, however, there continues to be growing bacterial resistance to the drug. Today, about 25 - 35% of H. pylori bacteria are metronidazole-resistant.

Side Effects of Antibiotics.

The most common side effects of nearly all antibiotics are gastrointestinal problems such as cramps, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Allergic reactions can also occur with all antibiotics, but are most common with medications derived from penicillin or sulfa. These reactions can range from mild skin rashes to rare, but severe -- even life-threatening -- anaphylactic shock.
Some drugs, including certain over-the-counter medications, interact with antibiotics; patients should report to all medications they are taking to their doctor.
Antibiotics double the risk of vaginal infections in women.

Compounds that contain bismuth are often used in the three-drug antibiotic regimens. They destroy the cell walls of H. pylori bacteria. The only bismuth compound available in the U.S. has been bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol), although a drug combination of the H2 blocker ranitidine and bismuth citrate (Tritec) has been released. High doses can cause vomiting and depression of the central nervous system, but the doses given for ulcer patients rarely cause side effects.

H2 blockers interfere with acid production by blocking histamine, a substance produced by the body that encourages acid secretion in the stomach. H2 blockers were the standard treatment for peptic ulcers until antibiotic regimens against H. pylori were developed. These drugs cannot cure ulcers, but they are useful in certain cases. They are effective only for duodenal ulcers, however.

Four H2 blockers are currently available over-the-counter in the U.S.: famotidine (Pepcid AC), cimetidine (Tagamet), ranitidine (Zantac), and nizatidine (Axid). All have good safety profiles and few side effects. There are some differences between these drugs:

Famotidine (Pepcid AC). Famotidine is the most potent H2 blocker. The most common side effect is headache, which occurs in 4. 7% of people who take it. Famotidine is virtually free of drug interactions, but it may have significant adverse effects in patients with kidney problems.
Cimetidine (Tagamet). Cimetidine has few side effects; about 1% of people taking cimetidine experience mild temporary diarrhea, dizziness, rash, or headache. Cimetidine interacts with a number of commonly used medications, including phenytoin, theophylline, and warfarin. Long-term use of excessive doses (more than 3 grams a day) may cause impotence or breast enlargement in men. These problems resolve after the drug is discontinued.
Ranitidine (Zantac). Ranitidine interacts with very few drugs. In one study, ranitidine provided more pain relief and healed ulcers more quickly than cimetidine in people younger than age 60, but there was no difference in older patients. A common side effect of ranitidine is headache, which occurs in about 3% of people who take it.

That being said, a literature review of clinical trials showed that the PPIs are more effective than the H2 blockers in healing ulcers in people who take NSAIDs. After 8 weeks of treatment, healing rates of both gastric and duodenal ulcers were:

92% and 88% with esomeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg (vs 74% with ranitidine).
87% and 84% with omeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg (vs 64% with ranitidine).
And 73 - 74% and 66 - 69% with lansoprazole 30 mg and 15 mg (vs 50 - 53% with ranitidine).
However, healing rates with ranitidine reached nearly 100% when NSAIDs were discontinued.

Nizatidine (Axid). Nizatidine is nearly free of side effects and drug interactions.

Long-Term Concerns. In most cases, these H2 blockers have good safety profiles and few side effects. Because H2 blockers can interact with other drugs, be sure to tell your doctor about any other drugs you are taking. There are also some concerns about possible long-term effects -- for example, that long-term acid suppression with these drugs may cause cancerous changes in the stomach in patients who also have untreated H. pylori infection. More research is needed. However, the following concerns are real:

Liver damage. This is more likely with ranitidine than other H2 blockers, but is rare in any event.
Kidney-related complications. With famotidine, adverse effects on the central nervous system in patients with even moderate kidney insufficiency have been reported, resulting in anxiety, depression, and mental disturbances.
Increased risk for pneumonia in hospitalized patients.
Ulcer perforation and bleeding. Some experts are concerned that the use of acid-blocking drugs may actually increase the risk for serious complications by masking the ulcer's symptoms.

Misoprostol (Cytotec) increases prostaglandin levels in the stomach lining, which protects against the major intestinal toxicity of NSAIDs.

Actions against Ulcers. Misoprostol can reduce formation of ulcers in the upper small intestine by two-thirds and in the stomach by three-fourths. It does not neutralize or reduce acid, so although the drug is helpful for preventing NSAID-induced ulcers, it is not useful in healing existing ulcers.

Side Effects.

Diarrhea and other gastrointestinal problems are severe enough to cause 20% of patients to stop taking the drug. Taking misoprostol after meals should minimize these effects. One study indicated that taking the drug 2 - 3 times a day, instead of the standard regimen of 4 times, may prove to be just as effective and cause fewer side effects.
Misoprostol can induce abortion or cause birth defects and should not be taken by pregnant women. If pregnancy occurs during treatment, the drug should be discontinued at once and the doctor contacted immediately.

Actions against Ulcers. PPIs are the drugs of choice for managing patients with peptic ulcers from any cause. They suppress the production of stomach acid by blocking the gastric acid pump -- the molecule in the stomach glands that is responsible for acid secretion.

PPIs can be used either as part of a multidrug regimen for H. pylori or alone for preventing and healing NSAID-caused ulcers. One retrospective study found that adding a PPI to diclofenac therapy reduced hospitalization for ulcers by 60%. They are also useful in treating ulcers caused by Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Some people carry a gene that reduces the effectiveness of PPIs. This gene is present in 18 - 20% of people of Asian descent.

Standard Brands. Most PPIs are available by prescription as oral drugs. There is no evidence that one brand of PPI works better than another. Brands approved for ulcer prevention and treatment include:

Omeprazole (generic, Prilosec OTC)
Esomeprazole (Nexium)
Lansoprazole (Prevacid)
Rabeprazole (Aciphex)

Possible Adverse Effects.

Side effects are uncommon, but may include headache, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and itching.
Pregnant women and nursing mothers should avoid taking PPIs, although recent studies suggest that these drugs do not increase the risk of birth defects.
PPIs may interact with certain drugs, such as antiseizure agents (such as phenytoin), antianxiety drugs (such as diazepam), and blood thinners (such as warfarin).
Long-term use of high-dose PPIs may produce vitamin B12 deficiency, but studies are needed to confirm this risk.
In theory, long-term use of PPIs by people with H. pylori may reduce acid secretion enough to cause atrophic gastritis (chronic inflammation of the stomach), a risk factor for stomach cancer. Long-term use of PPIs may also mask symptoms of stomach cancer and delay diagnosis. At this time, however, there have been no reports of an increase in stomach cancer with long-term use of these drugs.

Sucralfate (Carafate) seems to work by adhering to the ulcer crater and protecting it from further damage by stomach acid and pepsin. It also promotes the defensive processes of the stomach. Sucralfate has an ulcer-healing rate similar to that of H2 blockers. Other than constipation, which occurs in 2.2% of patients, the drug has few side effects. Sucralfate does interact with a wide variety of drugs, however, including warfarin, phenytoin, and tetracycline.

Treatment for Bleeding Ulcers

When a patient comes to the hospital with bleeding ulcers, endoscopy is usually performed. This procedure is critical for the diagnosis, determination of treatment options, and treatment of bleeding ulcers.

In high-risk patients or those with evidence of bleeding, options include watchful waiting with medical treatments or surgery. The first critical steps for massive bleeding are to stabilize the patient and support vital functions with fluid replacement and possibly blood transfusions. People on NSAIDs should discontinue them, if possible.

Depending on the intensity of the bleeding, patients can be released from the hospital within a day or kept up to 3 days after endoscopy. Bleeding stops spontaneously in about 70 - 80% of patients, but about 30% of patients who come to the hospital for bleeding ulcers need surgery. Endoscopy is the surgical procedure most often used for treating bleeding ulcers and patients at high-risk for rebleeding. It is usually combined with medications, such as epinephrine and intravenous proton-pump inhibitors.

Between 10 - 20% of patients require more invasive procedures for bleeding, usually major abdominal surgery.

Endoscopy is important for both diagnosing and treating bleeding ulcers. The doctor first places a thin, flexible plastic tube called an endoscope into the patient's mouth and down the esophagus into the stomach.

Endoscopy for Diagnosing Bleeding Ulcers and Determining Risk of Rebleeding. With endoscopy, doctors are able to detect the signs of bleeding, such as active spurting or oozing of blood from arteries. Endoscopy can also detect specific features in the ulcers referred to as stigmata, which indicate a higher or lower risk of rebleeding.

Such features include the following:

Low risk (5 -15%) for bleeding: flat dot; a clean or white base.
High risk (30 - 50%) for bleeding: swollen but nonbleeding blood vessels; blood clots that adhere to ulcers.
According to one study, if patients with these high-risk features are untreated, their risk for rebleeding after endoscopy ranges from about 10% on the first day after endoscopy to about 3% by the third day. Identifying and treating patients with stigmata can reduce these risks. Other factors that increase the risk for rebleeding include bleeding disorders, very low blood pressure, other serious medical conditions, and bleeding that started after hospitalization.
After endoscopy, high-dose PPI therapy has been shown to significantly reduce the rate of rebleeding, need for surgery, and death from hemorrhage. The medication may be given intravenously, but studies show that oral PPI therapy is probably just as effective.

Endoscopy as Treatment. Endoscopy is usually used to treat bleeding from visible vessels that are less than 2 mm in diameter. This approach also appears to be very effective in preventing rebleeding in patients whose ulcers are not bleeding, but who have high-risk features (swollen blood vessels or clots adhering to ulcers).

The following is a typical endoscopy procedure:

The surgeon passes a probe through an endoscopic tube and applies electricity, heat, or small clips to coagulate the blood and stop the bleeding. This procedure also causes fluid buildup, which helps to compress the blood vessels.
In high-risk cases, the doctor may inject epinephrine (commonly known as adrenaline) directly into the ulcer to enhance the effects of the heating process. Epinephrine activates the process leading to blood coagulation, narrows the arteries, and enhances blood clotting.
Intravenous (IV) administration of a PPI (usually omeprazole or pantoprazole) significantly prevents rebleeding and appears to be cost-effective. In one study, the use of IV PPIs reduced the risk of bleeding from 23% to 7%. (Oral PPIs are also effective, but studies are needed to compare their effectiveness versus IV PPIs.) A PPI may also be useful for initial bleeding episodes when endoscopy is unsuccessful, inappropriate, or unavailable.

Intravenous H2 blockers are often used, but a major analysis reported no benefit in bleeding duodenal ulcers, although they may be effective in gastric ulcers.

Endoscopy is effective in controlling bleeding in more than 85% of appropriate candidates. If rebleeding occurs, a repeat endoscopy is effective in about 75% of patients. Those who fail to respond require major abdominal surgery. The most serious complication from endoscopy is perforation of the stomach or intestinal wall, which occurred in about 1.4% of patients in a large 2002 study.

While endoscopy and clipping are routine treatment for bleeding ulcers in the U.S., a Korean study found little difference in outcomes between clipping (plus H2 therapy) and oral PPI therapy alone. In a randomized test of 129 patients, hemostasis (end of bleeding) was achieved in 93.5% of patients after clipping and 92.5% of patients on oral PPIs at 24 hours. The rate of rebleeding was 6.9% with clipping and 7.5% with PPIs.

Other Medical Considerations. Certain agents may be warranted after endoscopy:

Patients who harbor the H. pylori bacteria, even when the bleeding has been caused by NSAID use, should be treated with antibiotic therapy to eliminate the bacteria. Triple therapy, including antibiotics, to eliminate H. pylori immediately after endoscopy is warranted in most patients infected with the bacteria.
Somatostatin (a hormone used to prevent bleeding in cirrhosis) is also useful for reducing persistent peptic ulcer bleeding or the risk of recurrence. Researchers are investigating adding other therapies, such as fibrin glue, a blood clotting factor. To date, no therapy has proven to be more effective than current treatments.

Major abdominal surgery for bleeding ulcers is now generally performed only when endoscopy fails or is not appropriate. Certain emergencies may require surgical repair, such as when an ulcer perforates the wall of the stomach or intestine, causing sudden intense pain and life-threatening infection.

Surgical Approaches. The standard major surgical approach uses a wide abdominal incision and standard surgical instruments (called open surgery). Laparoscopic techniques employ small abdominal incisions and the insertion of tubes that contain miniature cameras and instruments. Laparoscopic techniques are increasingly being used for perforated ulcers. Surgery is not effective for upper GI ulceration caused by chronic NSAID use.

Major Surgical Procedures. There are a number of surgical procedures aimed at long-term relief of ulcer complications. These include:

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a gastrectomy procedure.

Vagotomy, in which the vagus nerve is cut to interrupt messages from the brain that stimulate acid secretion in the stomach. This surgery may impair stomach emptying. A recent variation that cuts only parts of the nerve may reduce this complication.
Antrectomy, in which the lower part of the stomach is removed. This part manufactures the hormone responsible for stimulation of digestive juices.
Pyloroplasty, which enlarges the opening into the small intestine so that stomach contents can pass into it more easily.

Antrectomy and pyloroplasty are usually performed with vagotomy.

Lifestyle Changes

In the past, it was common practice to tell people suffering from peptic ulcers to consume small, frequent amounts of bland foods. Exhaustive research conducted since that time has shown that a bland diet is not effective in reducing the incidence or recurrence of ulcers, and that eating numerous small meals throughout the day is no more effective than eating three meals a day. Large amounts of food should still be avoided, because stretching the stomach can result in painful symptoms.

Fruits and Vegetables. The good news is that a diet rich in fiber may cut the risk of developing ulcers in half and speed healing of existing ulcers. Fiber found in fruits and vegetables is particularly protective; vitamin A contained in many of these foods may increase the benefit. Some studies on associations between specific food chemicals and ulcers are as follows:

In one study, apples and yams appeared to be especially helpful.
Apples, celery, cranberries, onions, red wine, and green and black tea are also high in natural chemicals known as flavonoids, which appear to inhibit H. pylori growth and have many other health benefits. Cranberry juice specifically may have properties that help prevent H. pylori from infecting the intestinal lining.
Grapefruit has antioxidant properties that may help heal ulcers.
Studies on rats have found that dietary nitrate increases nitric oxide in the gut and causes the mucus layer to thicken. Pretreatment with nitrate provided dramatic protection against diclofenac-induced ulcers. High levels of dietary nitrate are found in many vegetables.
Laboratory experiments suggest that sulforaphone, a compound found in broccoli and broccoli sprouts, may be lethal to even drug-resistant strains of H. pylori.
Tea has chemicals that may help protect against cancers in the stomach and esophagus.

Milk. Milk actually encourages the production of acid in the stomach, although moderate amounts (2 - 3 cups a day) appear to do no harm. Animal studies show that a milk protein called bovine alpha-lactalbumin protects against gastric ulcers caused by stress. Certain probiotics, which are "good" bacteria added to yogurt and other fermented milk drinks, may also have gastric protective qualities.

Coffee and Carbonated Beverages. Coffee (both caffeinated and decaffeinated), soft drinks, and fruit juices with citric acid increase stomach acid production. Although no studies have proven that any of these drinks contribute to ulcers, consuming more than 3 cups of coffee per day may increase susceptibility to H. pylori infection.

Spices and Peppers. Studies conducted on spices and peppers have yielded conflicting results. The rule of thumb is to use these substances moderately, and to avoid them if they irritate the stomach.

Garlic. Some studies suggest that high amounts of garlic may have some protective properties against stomach cancer, although a recent study concluded that it offered no benefits against H. pylori and, in high amounts, can cause considerable GI distress.

Olive Oil. Studies from Spain have shown that phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil may have strong bactericidal activity against 8 strains of H. pylori, 3 of which are resistant to antibiotics.

Vitamins. Although no vitamins have been shown to protect against ulcers, H. pylori appears to impair absorption of vitamin C, which may play a role in the higher risk of stomach cancer.

Some evidence exists that exercise may help reduce the risk for ulcers in some people. In one study, exercise was associated with a lower risk for duodenal, but not gastric, ulcers in men. In this study, exercise appeared to have no effect on ulcer development in women.

Stress relief programs have not been shown to promote ulcer healing, but they may have other health benefits.

Melatonin is a hormone found in the brain that is normally associated with sleep. Researchers have observed that the GI tract is rich in melatonin, and that the hormone may have properties that help prevent ulcers, reduce acid secretion, and improve blood flow. It is not known whether this would benefit people with peptic ulcers, but it appears to warrant some research. In the U.S., melatonin is classified as a dietary supplement and not a drug, so its quality and effectiveness are uncontrolled. The U.S. is the only developed nation that does not regulate this agent.

Resources

http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov -- National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse
www.gastro.org -- American Gastroenterological Association
www.acg.gi.org -- American College of Gastroenterology

References

deBortoli M, Leonardi G, Ciancia E, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized prospective study of triple therapy versus triple therapy plus lactoferrin and probiotics. Am J. Gastroenterol. 2007;102(5):951-956.

Guyton JR, Bays HE. Safety considerations with niacin therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(6A):22C-31C.

Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, et al. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):1179-1183.

Hallas J, Dall M, Andries A, et al. Use of single and combined antithrombotic therapy and risk of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: population based case-control study. BMS. 2006;333(7571):726. Epub 2006 Sept 19.

Hobsley M, Tovey F, Horton J. Precise role of H. pylori in duodenal ulceration. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(40):6413-6419.

Goer A, Gothe H, Schiffhorst G, Sterzel A, Grass U, Haussler B. Comparison of the effects of diclofenac or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and dicolfenac or other NSAIDs in combination with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on hospitalization due to peptic ulcer disease. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Feb 26 [Epub ahead of print].

Jansson EA, Petersson J, Reinders C, et al. Protection from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID)-induced gastric ulcers by dietary nitrate. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;41(4):510-518.

Keefer L, Stepanski EJ, Ranjbaran Z, Benson LM, Keshavarzian A. An initial report of sleep disturbance in inactive inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2006;2(4):409-416.

Kim JI, Cheung DY, Cho SH, et al. Oral proton pump inhibitors are as effective as endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 May 19 [Epub ahead of print].

Luo J, Nordenvall C, Nyren O, Adami HO, Permert J, Ye W. The risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(2):368-372.

Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain C, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastrict III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007;56(6):772-781.

Miki K, Urita Y, Ishikawa F, et al. Effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum fermented milk on Helicobacter pylori and serum pepsinogen levels in humans. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(6):2630-2640.

Moberly JB, Harris SI, Diff DS, et al. A randomized, double-blind, one-week study comparing the effects of a novel COX-2 inhibitor and naproxen on the gastric mucosa. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(2):442-450.

Moore ML. Misoprostol-is more research needed? J Perinat Educ. 2002;11(3):43-47.

Murthy S, Keyvani L, Leeson S, Targownik LE. Intravenous versus high-dose oral proton pump inhibitor therapy after endoscopic hemostasis of high-risk lesions in patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;63(11):773-775.

Pietroiusti A, Forlini A, Magrini A, et al. Shift work increases the frequency of duodenal ulcer in H. pylori infected workers. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(11):773-775.

Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Leandro G, et al. Clinical features of reflux esophagitis in older people: a study of 840 consecutive patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(10):1537-1542.

Romero C, Medina E, Vargas J, Brenes M, De Castro A. In vitro activity of olive oil polyphenols against Helicobacter pylori. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(3):680-688.

Saif MW, Elfiky A, Salem RR. Gastrointestinal perforation due to bevacizumab in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(6):1860-1869.

Simon-Rudler M, Massard J, Bernard-Chabert B, et al. Continuous infusion of high-dose omeprazole is more effective than standard-dose omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(:949-954.

Take S, Mizuno M, Ishiki K, et al. Baseline gastric mucosal atrophy is a risk factor associated with the development of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42(suppl 17):21-27.

Ushida Y, Shimokawa Y, Toida T, Matsui H, Takase M. Bovine alpha-lacalbumin stimulates mucus metabolism in gastric mucosa. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(2):541-546.

Vaira D, Zullo A, Vakil N, et al. Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(:556-563.

Verhamme K, Mosis G, Dieleman J, Stricker B, Sturkenboom M. Spironolactone and risk of upper gastrointestinal events: population-based case-control study. BMJ. 2006;333(7563):330. Epub 2006 Jul 13.

Yeomans ND, Svedberg LD, Naesdal J. Is ranitidine therapy sufficient for healing peptic ulcers associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use? Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(11):1401-407.

Zagari RM, Bianchi-Porro G, Fiocca R, Gasbarrini G, Roda E, Bazzoli F. Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the HYPER study. Gut. 2007;56(4):475-479.

Review Date:
6/22/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Diabetes - type 1

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:05 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Risk Factors
Symptoms
Life-Threatening Complicati...
Diagnosis
Dietary Goals and Exercise...
Treatment
Monitoring Tests
Long-Term Complications
Transplantation Procedures...
Prevention
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

New Continuous Glucose Meter System

In 2007, the FDA approved the STS-7 System, which monitors glucose levels every 5 minutes during a 7-day period. The STS-7 System, like other continuous glucose meter systems, is designed to be used in combination with traditional fingerstick tests and meters. It does not replace them. But the system can track trends and fluctuation patterns in blood sugar levels that fingerstick tests cannot detect.

Type 1 Diabetes Gene Discovered

In 2007, scientists announced the discovery of a gene that may increase the risk of developing childhood type 1 diabetes.

Anemia Drugs Warning

In 2007, following the publication of several studies in the New England Journal of Medicine, the FDA warned that erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs (used to treat anemia) can increase the risk for blood clots, strokes, and heart attacks when excessive doses are given. The FDA has set new dosing and hemoglobin target levels for these drugs. Anemia is a common complication of end-stage kidney disease.

Cell Transplantation Research

Islet cell transplantation using the Edmonton protocol is a promising treatment for type 1 diabetes, suggests a 2006 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The Edmonton protocol involves isolating islet cells from donor pancreases and then injecting the cells into the patient. In the first international multicenter trial of this investigational procedure, 44% of 36 patients were able to temporarily suspend insulin injections, while 28% achieved partial islet function.
Stem cell transplantation using cells harvested and re-infused from the patient’s own body may help increase beta cell function and eliminate the need for insulin injections, according to a small, preliminary study published in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Type 1 Diabetes Prevention Research

Scientists around the world are investigating new ways to prevent type 1 diabetes or at least delay its onset. Experimental preventive measures include treatment with oral insulin and with drugs that may prevent the immune system’s attack on beta cells.

Introduction

The two major forms of diabetes are type 1, previously called insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) or juvenile-onset diabetes, and type 2, previously called non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or maturity-onset diabetes.

Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes share one central feature: elevated blood sugar (glucose) levels due to absolute or relative insufficiencies of insulin, a hormone produced by the pancreas. Insulin is a key regulator of the body's metabolism. It works in the following way:

During and immediately after a meal the process of digestion breaks carbohydrates down into sugar molecules (of which glucose is one) and proteins into amino acids.
Right after the meal, glucose and amino acids are absorbed directly into the bloodstream, and blood glucose levels rise sharply. (Glucose levels after a meal are called postprandial levels.)
The rise in blood glucose levels signals important cells in the pancreas, called beta cells, to secrete insulin, which pours into the bloodstream. Within 20 minutes after a meal insulin rises to its peak level.
Insulin enables glucose and amino acids to enter cells in the body, particularly muscle and liver cells. Here, insulin and other hormones direct whether these nutrients will be burned for energy or stored for future use. (It should be noted that the brain and nervous system are not dependent on insulin; they regulate their glucose needs through other mechanisms.)
When insulin levels are high, the liver stops producing glucose and stores it in other forms until the body needs it again.
As blood glucose levels reach their peak, the pancreas reduces the production of insulin.
About 2 - 4 hours after a meal both blood glucose and insulin are at low levels, with insulin being slightly higher. The blood glucose levels are then referred to as fasting blood glucose concentrations.

The pancreas is located behind the liver and stomach. In addition to secreting digestive enzymes, the pancreas secretes the hormones insulin and glucagon into the bloodstream. The release of insulin into the blood lowers the level of blood glucose (simple sugars from food) by enhancing glucose to enter the body cells, where it is metabolized. If blood glucose levels get too low, the pancreas secretes glucagon to stimulate the release of glucose from the liver.

In type 1 diabetes, the disease process is more severe than with type 2 diabetes, and onset is usually in childhood:

Beta cells in the pancreas that produce insulin are gradually destroyed. Eventually insulin deficiency is absolute.
Without insulin to move glucose into cells, blood glucose levels become excessively high, a condition known as hyperglycemia.
Because the body cannot utilize the sugar, it spills over into the urine and is lost.
Weakness, weight loss, and excessive hunger and thirst are among the consequences of this "starvation in the midst of plenty."
Patients become dependent on administered insulin for survival.

Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes, accounting for 90% of cases. About 20 million Americans have type 2 diabetes and half are unaware they have it. The disease mechanisms in type 2 diabetes are not wholly known, but some experts suggest that it may involve the following three stages in most patients:

The first stage in type 2 diabetes is the condition called insulin resistance. Although insulin can attach normally to receptors on liver and muscle cells, certain mechanisms prevent insulin from moving glucose (blood sugar) into these cells where it can be used. Most patients with type 2 diabetes produce variable, even normal or high, amounts of insulin, and in the beginning this amount is usually sufficient to overcome such resistance.
Over time, the pancreas becomes unable to produce enough insulin to overcome resistance. In type 2 diabetes, the initial effect of this stage is usually an abnormal rise in blood sugar right after a meal (called postprandial hyperglycemia). This effect is now believed to be particularly damaging to the body.
Eventually, the cycle of elevated glucose further impairs and possibly destroys beta cells, thereby stopping insulin production completely and causing full-blown diabetes. This is made evident by fasting hyperglycemia, in which elevated glucose levels are present most of the time.

Maturity-Onset Diabetes in Youth. Maturity-onset diabetes in youth (MODY) is a rare genetic form of type 2 diabetes that develops only in Caucasian teenagers. It accounts for 2 - 5% of type 2 cases.

Gestational Diabetes. An estimated 5% of pregnant women develop a form of type 2 diabetes in their third trimester called gestational diabetes. Gestational diabetes is usually temporary. [See In-Depth Report #60: Diabetes - type 2.]

Conditions that damage or destroy the pancreas, such as pancreatitis, pancreatic surgery, or certain industrial chemicals can cause diabetes. Certain drugs can also cause temporary diabetes, including corticosteroids, beta-blockers, and phenytoin. Rare genetic disorders (Klinefelter's syndrome, Huntington's chorea, Wolfram's syndrome, leprechaunism, Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome, lipoatrophic diabetes, and others) and hormonal disorders (acromegaly, Cushing syndrome, pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, somatostatinoma, aldosteronoma) also increase the risk for diabetes.

Causes

Type 1 diabetes is usually a progressive autoimmune disease, in which the beta cells that produce insulin are slowly destroyed by the body's own immune system. It is unknown what first starts this cascade of immune events, but evidence suggests that both a genetic predisposition and environmental factors, such as a viral infection, are involved.

Islets of Langerhans contain beta cells and are located within the pancreas. Beta cells produce insulin which is needed to metabolize glucose within the body.

Certain factors are thought to be important in this process:

White blood cells called T lymphocytes produce immune factors called cytokines that attack and gradually destroy the beta cells of the pancreas. Important cytokines are interleukin-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma.
Specific proteins are also critical in the process. They include glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulin, and islet cell antigens. These proteins serve as autoantigens. That is, they trigger the self-attack of the autoantibodies on the body's own beta cells.

Progression from the first stage, known as insulitis, to full-blown diabetes can take 7 years or longer. Unfortunately, by the time a person is aware that something is wrong and goes to the doctor with symptoms of type 1 diabetes, about 80 - 90% of the beta cells have been destroyed.

More than half of patients with insulitis do not develop diabetes. Researchers are greatly interested in discovering any factors that prevent the disease.

Researchers have found at least 18 genetic locations, labeled IDDM1 - IDDM18, that are related to type 1 diabetes. The IDDM1 region contains the HLA genes that encode proteins called major histocompatibility complex. The genes in this region affect the immune response. New advances in genetic research are identifying other genetic components of type 1 diabetes. In 2007, scientists announced that they had discovered a gene, KIAA0350, on chromosome 16. Variations in this gene appear to increase the risk of a child developing type 1 diabetes. The research team expects to identify an additional 15 - 20 genes associated with type 1 diabetes.

The odds of inheriting the disease, however, are only 10% if a first-degree relative has diabetes, and even in identical twins, one twin has only a 33% chance of having type 1 diabetes if the other has it. Children are more likely to inherit the disease from a father with type 1 diabetes than from a mother with the disorder.

Genetic factors cannot fully explain the development of diabetes. Over the past 30 years, a major increase in the incidence of type 1 diabetes has been reported in certain European countries, and the incidence has nearly tripled in the northeastern U.S. If genetic factors were the only cause of type 1 diabetes, such an increase in cases would take at least 400 years.

Some researchers believe one or more viral infections may trigger the disease in genetically susceptible individuals. Researchers suggest the following scenario:

An infection introduces a viral protein that resembles a beta-cell protein.
T cells and antibodies are tricked by this resemblance into attacking the beta protein as well as the virus.

Among the viruses under scrutiny are enteric viruses, which attack the intestinal tract. Coxsackieviruses are a family of enteric viruses of particular interest. (One study has suggested that respiratory infection in a child's first year, and not later, may be protective against diabetes, perhaps by priming the immune response so that it is better able to respond later on to other organisms.)

Risk Factors

An estimated 1 million people in the U.S. have type 1 diabetes, with about 30,000 new cases diagnosed each year. It is much less common than type 2, however, consisting of only 5 - 10% of all cases of diabetes. Nevertheless, like type 2 diabetes, the incidence of type 1 diabetes among children and adolescents has been rising over the past few decades. Experts estimate that about 1 in every 400 - 600 children and adolescents has type 1 diabetes. While type 2 diabetes has been increasing among African-American and Hispanic adolescents, the highest rates of type 1 diabetes are found among Caucasian youth.

Type 1 can occur at any age but usually appears between infancy and the late 30s, most typically in childhood or adolescence. Boys and girls are equally vulnerable. Studies report the following may be risk factors for developing type 1 diabetes:

Being ill in early infancy.
Early foods. Some studies have reported that early exposure to cow's milk in infancy and not being breast fed increased the risk for type 1 diabetes. Two studies in 2003 suggested that very early exposure to cereal -- not cow's milk -- plays a role in risk. Any risk from early dietary factors is still very low and likely to affect children who already have a genetically impaired immune response to dietary proteins. Breast milk contains factors that may help regulate the immune response and prevent diabetes in such children. National differences in risk also suggest that not all cow's milk is the same, and some proteins may confer higher risks than others.
Having a parent with type 1 diabetes.
Having an older mother.
Having a mother who had preeclampsia during pregnancy.
Obesity in children has long been linked to a higher risk for type 2 diabetes. Two 2001 studies reported an association between high weight at birth and obesity during childhood as risk factors for type 1 diabetes as well. The common risk factor may be an increase in insulin secretion, which occurs with obesity. This theoretically could overstress the beta cells so that they become susceptible to damage by overactive immune factors (particularly cytokines), and eventually to destruction in children genetically vulnerable to type 1 diabetes.

Until recently, diabetes in children was almost always type 1 diabetes. Of major concern, however, are estimates that between 8 - 45% of new diabetes cases in children are now type 2, most likely because of the increase in childhood obesity. [See In-Depth Report #60: Diabetes - type 2.]

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is higher than average among people with other autoimmune diseases, including Grave's disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis (a form of hypothyroidism), Addison's disease, multiple sclerosis (MS), and pernicious anemia. Research has raised the possibility that all autoimmune diseases share a common genetic basis. A 2001 study found, for example, that the T-cell immune factors in type 1 diabetes target the same self-antigens as in multiple sclerosis (MS). Both diseases have been associated with cow's milk protein. Many questions are unanswered, however. It is not known why the diseases develop in different locations to cause separate disorders or why some autoimmune events occur in everyone but not everyone develops an autoimmune disease.

There is a very wide variation in incidence of type 1 among population groups. Type 1 diabetes appears to be most common in people of northern European descent and in specific Mediterranean groups (such as Sardinians). It is less common among Asians and African-Americans. Still, African-Americans with type 1 diabetes are 50% more likely to die from it than Caucasians, mostly due to lower-quality health care.

Symptoms

The process that destroys the insulin-producing beta cells can be long and insidious. At the point when insulin production bottoms out, however, type 1 diabetes usually appears suddenly and progresses quickly. Warning signs of type 1 diabetes include:

Frequent urination (in children, a recurrence of bed-wetting after toilet training has been completed)
Unusual thirst, especially for sweet, cold drinks
Extreme hunger
Sudden, sometimes dramatic, weight loss
Weakness
Extreme fatigue
Blurred vision or other changes in eyesight
Irritability
Nausea and vomiting (acute symptoms)

Children with type 1 diabetes may also be restless, apathetic, and have trouble functioning at school. In severe cases, diabetic coma may be the first sign of type 1 diabetes.

Life-Threatening Complications

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening complication that develops when insulin stores are depleted. It is almost always caused by noncompliance with insulin treatments. Other contributing factors are lack of health insurance and intentionally reducing insulin levels in order to lose weight. In one study, adolescent girls were at higher risk for ketoacidosis than other groups of children and young people.

Diabetic ketoacidosis often develop as follows:

The process is usually triggered in insulin-deficient patients by a stressful event, most often pneumonia or urinary tract infections. Other triggers include alcohol abuse, physical injury, pulmonary embolism, heart attacks, or other illnesses.
Severely low insulin levels cause excessive amounts of glucose in the bloodstream (hyperglycemia).
Fat breakdown then accelerates and increases the production of fatty acids.

These fatty acids are converted into chemicals called ketone bodies, which are toxic at high levels. Symptoms and complications include:

Nausea and vomiting
Deep and rapid breathing may with frequent sighing
Rapid heartbeat
Cerebral edema, or brain swelling, is a rare but very dangerous complication that occurs in 1% of ketoacidosis cases and results in coma, brain damage, or death in many cases. Research now suggests that the risk for this complication is significantly higher in children with severe ketoacidosis (indicated by low carbon dioxide levels and high nitrogen urea levels), and possibly if they are also treated with bicarbonate to reduce acid levels.
Other serious complications from DKA include aspiration pneumonia and adult respiratory distress syndrome.
If the condition persists, coma and eventually death may occur, although over the past 20 years, death from DKA has decreased to about 2% of all cases.

Life-saving treatment uses rapid rehydration with a salt (saline) solution followed by low-dose insulin and potassium replacement.

Ketoacidosis is a serious condition of glucose build-up in the blood and urine. A simple urine test can determine if high ketone levels are present.

Tight blood sugar (glucose) control increases the risk of low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). Hypoglycemia, also called insulin shock, occurs if blood glucose levels fall below normal. Hypoglycemia may also be caused by insufficient intake of food, or excess exercise or alcohol. Usually the condition is manageable, but occasionally, it can be severe or even life threatening, particularly if the patient fails to recognize the symptoms.

Risk Factors for Severe Hypoglycemia. Among young patients, the youngest children and boys of any age are at higher risk for hypoglycemia. Specific risk factors for severe hypoglycemia include:

Intensively controlling blood glucose and HbA1c levels
Having long-term diabetes
Being less educated about the condition
Being underinsured
Having psychiatric disorders

Hypoglycemia unawareness. Hypoglycemia unawareness is a condition in which people become insensitive to hypoglycemic symptoms. It affects about 25% of patients who use insulin, nearly always people with type 1 diabetes. In such cases, hypoglycemia appears suddenly, without warning, and can escalate to a severe level. Even a single recent episode of hypoglycemia may make it more difficult to detect the next episode. With vigilant monitoring and by rigorously avoiding low blood glucose levels, patients can often regain the ability to sense the symptoms. However, even very careful testing may fail to detect a problem, particularly one that occurs during sleep.

Symptoms. Mild symptoms usually occur at moderately low and easily correctable levels of blood glucose. They include:

Sweating
Trembling
Hunger
Rapid heartbeat

Severely low blood glucose levels can cause neurologic symptoms such as:

Confusion
Weakness
Disorientation
Combativeness
In rare and worst cases, coma, seizure, and death

Preventive Measures. The following tips may help avoid hypoglycemia or prepare for attacks.

Nocturnal hypoglycemia (which occurs during sleep) is a common problem for children, even those on nonintensive insulin therapy. (The risk for hypoglycemia is high in any case in children.) Bedtime snacks are advisable if blood glucose levels are below 180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L). Protein snacks may be best. (The use of the insulin pump may help prevent hypoglycemic episodes.)
Some research has suggested that children (particularly thin children) are at higher risk for hypoglycemia because the injection goes into muscle tissue. Pinching the skin so that only fat (and not muscle) tissue is gathered or using shorter needles may help.
Various insulin regimens are available that can reduce the risk. For example, taking a fast-acting insulin (insulin lispro) before the evening meal may be particularly helpful in preventing hypoglycemia.
Patients who intensively control their blood sugar should monitor blood levels as often as possible, four times or more per day. This is particularly important for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness.
In adults, it is particularly critical to monitor blood glucose levels before driving, when hypoglycemia can be very hazardous.
Patients who are at risk for hypoglycemia should always carry hard candy, juice, sugar packets, or commercially available glucose substitutes.

Family and friends should be aware of the symptoms and be prepared:

If the patient is helpless (but not unconscious), family or friends should administer three to five pieces of hard candy, two to three packets of sugar, half a cup (four ounces) of fruit juice, or a commercially available glucose solution.
If there is inadequate response within 15 minutes, additional oral sugar should be provided or the patient should receive emergency medical treatment, possibly including the intravenous administration of a glucose solution.
Family members and friends can learn to inject glucagon, a hormone, which, in contrast to insulin, raises blood glucose.

Click the icon to see an example of a glucagon kit.

Experts have been concerned that the increased incidence of hypoglycemia accompanying strict blood glucose control could cause mental deterioration over time, but a 6-year study has found no evidence of this in adolescents and adults. (The effect on young children, however, is not known.)

Diagnosis

Fasting Plasma Glucose. The fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test is the standard test for diagnosing diabetes. It is a simple blood test taken after 8 hours of fasting. In general, results indicate the following:

FPG levels are considered normal up to 100 mg/dL (or 5.5 mmol/L).
Levels between 100 - 125 mg/dL (5.5 - 7.0 mmol/L) are referred to as impaired fasting glucose or pre-diabetes. These levels are considered to be risk factors for type 2 diabetes and its complications.
Diabetes is diagnosed when FPG levels are 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or higher.

The FPG test is not always reliable, so a repeat test is recommended if the initial test suggests the presence of diabetes, or if the tests are normal in people who have symptoms or risk factors for diabetes. For example, people who take the test in the afternoon and show normal results may actually have abnormal levels that would be revealed if they are tested in the morning.

Glucose Tolerance Test. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is more complex than the FPG and may overdiagnose diabetes in people who do not have it. Some experts recommend it as a follow-up after FPG, if the latter test results are normal but the patient has symptoms or risk factors of diabetes. The test uses the following procedures:

It first uses an FPG test.
A blood test is then taken 2 hours later after drinking a special glucose solution.

The following results suggest different conditions:

OGTT levels are normal up to 140 mg/dL.
Levels between 140 - 199 mg/dL are referred to as impaired glucose tolerance or pre-diabetes.
Diabetes is diagnosed when OGTT levels are 200 mg/dL or higher.

Both the FPG and OGTT tests require that the patient not eat for at least 8 hours prior to the test.

The oral glucose tolerance test is used to diagnose diabetes. The first portion of the test involves drinking a special glucose solution. Blood is then taken several hours later to test for the level of glucose in the blood. Patients who have diabetes will have higher than normal levels of glucose in their blood.

Test for Glycated Hemoglobin. Another test examines blood levels glycated hemoglobin, also known as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Measuring glycated hemoglobin is not currently used for an initial diagnosis, but it may be useful for determining the severity of diabetes.

The basis for its use as a diagnostic measurement in diabetes is as follows:

Hemoglobin is a protein molecule found in red blood cells. When glucose binds to it, the hemoglobin becomes modified, a process called glycation.
Glycation affects a number of proteins, and elevated levels of glycolated hemoglobin is strongly associated with complications of diabetes.
A glycated hemoglobin level of 1% above normal range identifies diabetes in 98% of patients. Normal HbA1c levels do not necessarily rule out diabetes, but if diabetes is present and levels are normal, the risk for complications is low.

The test is not affected by food intake so it can be taken at any time. A home test has been developed that might make it easier to measure HbA1c. In general, measurements suggest the following:

Normal HbA1c levels should be below 7%.
Levels of 11 - 12% glycolated hemoglobin indicate poor control of carbohydrates. High levels are also markers for kidney trouble.

Testing for Insulin Resistance. Investigators hope that some day a simple test for insulin resistance will be available to identify people at risk for diabetes. Some research suggests that measuring insulin and triglyceride levels during a fasting period may predict a person's sensitivity to insulin.

Type 1 diabetes is characterized by the presence of a variety of antibodies that attack the islet cells. These antibodies are referred to as autoantibodies because they attack the body's own cells -- not a foreign invader. Blood tests for these autoantibodies can help differentiate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Screening for Heart Disease. All patients with diabetes should be tested for high blood pressure (hypertension) and unhealthy cholesterol and lipid levels and given an electrocardiogram. For cholesterol, people with diabetes should aim for LDL levels below 100 mg/dL, HDL levels over 50 mg/dL, and triglyceride levels below 150 mg/dL. Blood pressure goals should be 130/80 mmHg or lower. Other tests may be needed in patients with signs of heart disease.

High blood pressure is strongly associated with diabetic nephropathy (kidney disease). In fact, patients with type 2 diabetes who show signs of microalbuminuria typically already have hypertension. Type 1 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria, on the other hand, usually have normal blood pressure readings in the doctor's office. A 2002 study using home monitors, however, found that in patients with type 1 diabetes, high systolic blood pressure during sleep often occurs before development of nephropathy. (Systolic pressure is the first and higher number in a blood pressure reading.) Home blood pressure monitoring, may help identify patients with type 1 diabetes who are at risk for kidney damage.

Click the icon to see an image of an ECG.

Screening for Kidney Damage. The earliest manifestation of kidney disease is microalbuminuria, in which tiny amounts (30 - 300 mg per day) of protein called albumin are found in the urine. Microalbuminuria is also a marker for other complications involving blood vessel abnormalities, including heart attack and stroke.

The American Diabetes Association recommends that people with diabetes receive an annual microalbuminuria urine test. Patients should also have their blood creatinine tested at least once a year. Creatinine is a waste product that is removed from the blood by the kidneys. High levels of creatinine may indicate kidney damage. A doctor uses the results from a creatinine blood test to calculate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The GFR is an indicator of kidney function; it estimates how well the kidneys are cleaning the blood.

Screening for Retinopathy. The American Diabetes Association recommends that patients with type 1 diabetes have an annual comprehensive eye exam, with dilation, to check for signs of retina disease (retinopathy). Patients at low risk may need exams only every 2 - 3 years.

Screening for Neuropathy. All patients should be screened for nerve damage (neuropathy), including a comprehensive foot exam. Patients who have loss of sensation in their feet should have a foot exam every 3 - 6 months to check for ulcers or infections.

Screening for Thyroid Abnormalities. Thyroid function tests should be administered.

Dietary Goals and Exercise

The treatment goals for a diabetes diet are:

Achieve near-normal blood glucose levels. People with type 1 diabetes must coordinate calorie intake with medication or insulin administration, exercise, and other variables to control blood glucose levels. New forms of insulin now allow more flexibility in timing meals.
Protect the heart and aim for healthy lipid (cholesterol and triglyceride) levels and control of blood pressure.
Achieve reasonable weight. A reasonable weight is usually defined as what is achievable and sustainable, rather than one that is culturally defined as desirable or ideal. Children, pregnant women, and people recovering from illness should be sure to maintain adequate calories for health.
Manage or prevent complications of diabetes. People with diabetes, whether type 1 or 2, are at risk for a number of medical complications, including heart and kidney disease. Dietary requirements for diabetes must take these disorders into consideration.
Promote overall health.

Overall Guidelines. There is no such thing as a single diabetes diet. Patients should meet with a professional dietitian to plan an individualized diet within the general guidelines that takes into consideration their own health needs.

Healthy eating habits along with good control of blood glucose are the basic goals, and several good dietary methods are available to meet them. General dietary guidelines for diabetes recommend:

Carbohydrates should provide 45 – 65% of total daily calories. The type and amount of carbohydrate are both important. Best choices are vegetables, fruits, beans, and whole grains. These foods are also high in fiber. Patients with diabetes should monitor their carbohydrate intake either through carbohydrate counting or meal planning exchange lists
Fats should provide 25 – 35% of daily calories. Monounsaturated (olive, peanut, canola oils; avocados; nuts) and omega-3 polyunsaturated (fish, flaxseed oil, walnuts) fats are the best types. Limit saturated fat (red meat, butter) to less than 7% of daily calories. Choose nonfat or low-fat dairy instead of whole milk products. Limit trans-fats (hydrogenated fat found in snack foods, fried foods, commercially baked goods) to less than 1% of total calories.
Protein should provide 12 – 20% of daily calories, although this may vary depending on a patient’s individual health requirements. Patients with kidney disease should limit protein intake to less than 10% of calories. Fish, soy, and poultry are better protein choices than red meat

[See In-Depth Report #42: Diabetes diet.]

Weight gain is a potential side effect of intense diabetic control with insulin. Being overweight can increase the risk for health problems. On the other hand, studies suggest that more than one-third of women with diabetes omit or underuse insulin in order to lose weight. Eating disorders have become a serious problem within the general population and are especially dangerous in patients with diabetes. Some evidence suggests that they contribute to about 20% of cases of recurrent ketoacidosis in young women. Ketoacidosis is a significant complication of insulin depletion and can be life threatening.

Aerobic exercise has significant and particular benefits for people with type 1 diabetes. It increases sensitivity to insulin, lowers blood pressure, improves cholesterol levels, and decreases body fat. Because glucose levels swing dramatically during workouts, people with type 1 diabetes need to take certain precautions:

Monitor glucose levels carefully before, during, and after workouts.
Avoid exercise if glucose levels are above 300 mg/dL or under 100 mg/dL.
To avoid hypoglycemia, inject insulin in sites away from the muscles they use the most during exercise.
Before exercising, avoid alcohol and if possible certain drugs, including beta-blockers, which increase the risk of hypoglycemia.
Insulin-dependent athletes may need to decrease insulin doses or take in more carbohydrates, especially in the form of pre-exercise snacks. Skim milk is particularly helpful. They should also drink plenty of fluids.
Good, protective footwear is essential to help avoid injuries and wounds to the feet.

Resistance or high impact exercises should be avoided. They can strain weakened blood vessels in the eyes of patients with retinopathy. High-impact exercise may also injure blood vessels in the feet. Because patients with diabetes may have silent heart disease, they should always check with their doctors before undertaking vigorous exercise.

A 2006 study of over 19,000 children with type 1 diabetes found that regular physical activity helps improve blood sugar levels without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia. The researchers suggest that doctors recommend regular exercise for pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Various fraudulent products are often sold on the Internet as “cures” or treatments for diabetes. These dietary supplements have not been studied or approved. In 2006, the FDA and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched a crackdown on these scams. The FDA and FTC warn patients with diabetes not to be duped by bogus and unproven remedies.

Treatment

Insulin is essential for strict control of blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes. Tight blood glucose control is the best way to prevent major complications in type 1 diabetes including those that affect the kidneys, eyes, nerve pathways, and blood vessels. Intensive insulin treatment in early diabetes may even help preserve any residual insulin secretion for at least 2 years.

There are, however, some significant problems with intensive insulin therapy:

There is a higher risk for low blood sugar (hypoglycemia).
Many patients experience significant weight gain from insulin administration, which may have adverse effects on blood pressure and cholesterol levels. It is important to manage heart disease risk factors that might develop as a result of insulin treatment.

A diet plan that compensates for insulin administration and supplies healthy foods is extremely important. [See In-Depth Report #42: Diabetes diet.] Pancreas transplantation eventually may be recommended for patients who cannot control glucose levels without frequent episodes of severe hypoglycemia.

The goal of intensive insulin therapy is to keep blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible. In one major study, even when levels were 40% higher than nondiabetic levels, benefits were still observed.


	Normal	Goal
Blood glucose levels before meals	Less than 110 mg/dL (or 6.1 mmol/L)	90 - 130 mg/dL (or 5 - 7.2 mmol/L)
Bedtime blood glucose levels	Less than 120 mg/dL (6.6 mmol/L)	110 - 150 mg/dL (or 6.1 - 8.3 mmol/L)
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels	4 - 6%	Less than 7%
Source: National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Standard insulin therapy usually consists of one or two daily insulin injections, one daily blood sugar test, and visits to the health care team every 3 months. For strictly controlling blood glucose, however, intensive management is required. The regimen is complicated although newer insulin forms may make it easier.

There are two components to flexible insulin administration and a number of variations of insulin delivery for accomplishing them:

Basal insulin administration. The basal component of the treatment attempts to provide a steady amount of background insulin throughout the day. Basal insulin levels maintain regular blood glucose needs. Insulin glargine now offers the most consistent insulin activity level, but other intermediate and long-acting forms may be beneficial when administered twice a day. Short-acting insulin delivered continuously using a pump is proving to a very good way to provide basal rates of insulin.
Mealtime insulin administration. Meals require a boost (a bolus) of insulin to regulate the sudden rise in glucose levels after a meal.

In achieving insulin control the patient must also take other steps:

The patient should perform four or more blood glucose tests during the day.
Patients should coordinate insulin administration with calorie intake. In general, they should eat three meals each day at regular intervals. Snacks are often required.
Insulin requirements vary depending on many non-nutritional situations during the day, including exercise and sleep. People are at enhanced risk for low blood sugar during exercise. Some patients experience a sudden rise in blood glucose levels in the morning -- the so-called "dawn phenomenon."
The patient must also maintain a good diet plan and should visit the health care team of doctors, nurses, and dietitians once a month.

Because of the higher risk for hypoglycemia in children, experts recommend that intensive treatment be used very cautiously in children under 13 and not at all in very young children.

Insulin cannot be taken orally because the body's digestive juices destroy it. Injections of insulin under the skin ensure that it is absorbed slowly by the body for a long-lasting effect. The timing and frequency of insulin injections depend upon a number of factors:

The duration of insulin action. Insulin is available in several forms, including: standard, intermediate, long-acting, and rapid-acting.
Amount and type of food eaten. Ingestion of food makes the blood glucose level rise. Alcohol lowers levels.
The person's level of physical activity. Exercise lowers glucose levels.

Fast-Acting Insulin. Insulin lispro (Humalog) and insulin aspart (Novo Rapid, Novolog) lower blood sugar very quickly, usually within 5 minutes after injection. Insulin peaks in about 4 hours and continues to work for about 4 hours. This rapid action reduces the risk for hypoglycemic events after eating (postprandial hypoglycemia). Optimal timing for administering this insulin is about 15 minutes before a meal, but it can be also taken immediately after a meal (but within 30 minutes). Fast-acting insulins may be especially useful for meals with high carbohydrates.

Regular Insulin. Regular insulin begins to act 30 minutes after injection, reaches its peak at 2 - 4 hours, and lasts about 6 hours. Regular insulin may be administered before a meal and may be better for high-fat meals.

Intermediate Insulin. NPH (neutral protamine Hagedorn) insulin has been the standard intermediate form. It works within 2 - 4 hours, peaks 4 - 12 hours later, and lasts up to 18 hours. Lente (insulin zinc) is another intermediate insulin that peaks 4 - 12 hours and lasts up to 18 hours.

Long-Acting (Ultralente) Insulin. Long-acting insulins, such as insulin glargine (Lantus), are released slowly. Insulin glargine matches parts of natural insulin and maintains stable activity for more than 24 hours. Studies suggest that it poses less of a risk for hypoglycemia and weight gain than NPH. It has a higher incidence of pain at the injection site than NPH. Ultralente insulin peaks at 10 hours and lasts up to 20 hours but varies greatly in activity from day to day.

Combinations. Regimens generally include combinations of short and longer-acting insulins to help match the natural cycle. For example, one approach in patients who are intensively controlling their glucose levels uses 3 injections of insulin, which includes a mixture of regular insulin and NPH at dinner. Another approach uses 4 injections, including a separate short-acting form at dinner and NPH at bedtime, which may pose a lower risk for nighttime hypoglycemia than the 3-injection regimen.

Insulin Pumps. An insulin pump can improve blood glucose control and quality of life with fewer hypoglycemic episodes than multiple injections. The pumps correct for the “dawn phenomenon” (sudden rise of blood glucose in the morning) and allow quick reductions for specific situations, such as exercise. Many different brands are available.

The typical pump is about the size of a beeper and has a digital display. Some are worn externally and are programmed to deliver insulin through a catheter in the skin or the abdomen. They generally use rapid-acting insulin, the most predictable type. They work by administering a small amount of insulin continuously (the basal rate) and a higher dose (a bolus dose) when food is eaten.

Many adults, adolescents, and school children use insulin pumps. A 2006 study found that even very young children (ages 2 - 7 years) can successfully use insulin pumps and that the pumps provided better blood sugar control than twice-daily insulin injections.

The catheter at the end of the insulin pump is inserted through a needle into the abdominal fat of a person with diabetes. Dosage instructions are entered into the pump's small computer, and the appropriate amount of insulin is then injected into the body in a calculated, controlled manner.

Learning to use the pump can be complicated, although over time most patients find the devices are fairly easy to use. To achieve good control, patients and parents of children must undergo some training. The patient and doctor must determine the amount of insulin used -- it is not automatically calculated. This requires an initial learning period, including understanding insulin needs over the course of the day and in different situations and knowledge of carbohydrate counting. Frequent blood testing is very important, particularly during the training period.

Insulin pumps are more expensive than insulin shots and occasionally have some complications, such as blockage in the device or skin irritation at the infusion site. In spite of early reports of a higher risk for ketoacidosis with pumps, more recent studies have found no higher risk.

Insulin Pens. Insulin pens, which contain cartridges of insulin, have been available for some time. Until recently, they were fairly complicated and difficult to use. Newer, prefilled pens (Humulin Pen, Humalog) are disposable and allow the patient to dial in the correct amount.

Inhaled Aerosol. In 2006, the FDA approved the first non-injected form of insulin. Exubera is an inhaled form of insulin. It is approved for adults but should not be used by patients who smoke or have quit smoking within the past 6 months. Patients with asthma, bronchitis, or emphysema should also not use inhaled insulin. Scientists are also developing other types of non-injected insulin, including spray formulas.

Other Alternative Insulin Delivery Methods. Another promising avenue of investigation for delivering insulin is the use of ultrasound pulses.

Pramlintide (Symlin) is a new type of injectable drug that can help control postprandial hyperglycemia, the sudden increase in blood sugar after a meal. Pramlintide is injected before meals and can help lower blood sugar levels in the 3 hours after meals. Pramlintide is used in addition to insulin for patients who take insulin regularly but still need better blood sugar control. The FDA approved this drug in 2005 for adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Pramlintide and insulin are the only two drugs approved for treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Pramlintide is a synthetic form of amylin, a hormone that is related to insulin. Side effects may include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, headache, fatigue, and dizziness. Patients with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of severe low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) that may occur within 3 hours following a pramlintide injection. This drug should not be used if patients have trouble knowing when their blood sugar is low or have slow stomach emptying (gastroparesis).

CD3-Antibodies. A new type of drug called a CD3 antibody is showing promise for helping patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. In phase II clinical trials, patients received the drug for 6 days. Results from a 2005 trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine indicated that the CD3 antibody helped stimulate the patients’ natural insulin production and decreased their need for insulin drug therapy. The beneficial effects lasted up to 18 months after CD3 treatment. Researchers think that this drug affects the autoimmune response involved in type 1 diabetes and helps preserve the residual beta cell function of the pancreas.

Monitoring Tests

Both low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) and high blood sugar (hyperglycemia) are of concern for patients who take insulin. It is important, therefore, to carefully monitor blood glucose levels. In general, patients with type 1 diabetes need to take readings four or more times a day. Patients should aim for the following measurements:

Pre-meal glucose levels of between 90 - 130 mg/dL
Bedtime levels of between 110 - 150 mg/dL

Different goals may be required for specific individuals, including pregnant women, very old and very young people, and those with accompanying serious medical conditions.

Finger-Prick Test. A typical blood sugar test includes the following:

A drop of blood is obtained by pricking the finger.
The blood is then applied to a chemically treated strip.
Monitors read and provide results.

Home monitors are about 10 - 15% less accurate than laboratory monitors are and many do not meet the standards of the American Diabetes Association. Most doctors believe, however, that they are accurate enough to indicate when blood sugar is too low.

To monitor the amount of glucose within the blood a person with diabetes should test their blood regularly. The procedure is quite simple and can often be done at home.

Some simple procedures may improve accuracy:

Testing the meter once a month.
Recalibrating it whenever a new packet of strips is used.
Using fresh strips; outdated strips may not provide accurate results.
Keeping the meter clean.
Periodically comparing the meter results with the results from a laboratory.

Supplementary Monitoring Devices. Other devices are available for monitoring blood glucose. These devices are used in addition to traditional fingerstick test kits and glucose meters but do not replace them:

Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) use a needle-like sensor inserted under the skin of the abdomen to monitor glucose levels every 5 minutes. In 2007, the STS-7 System was approved. Using a disposable sensor, the STS-7 measures glucose levels for up to a week. An alarm will sound if glucose levels are too high or low. The older Minimed system measures glucose over a 72-hour period and has wireless communication between the monitor and an insulin pump.
GlucoWatch is a battery-powered wristwatch-like device that measures glucose by sending tiny electric currents through the skin, a technique called reverse iontophoresis. It is painless and has a warning device when detecting high glucose levels. It takes 2 hours to warm up, and the sensor pads need to be changed every day. Glucowatch measures glucose levels three times per hour for up to 12 hours. About a quarter of the time, the results differ significantly from actual fingerstick tests, however.

Hemoglobin A1c (also called HbA1c , HA1c, or A1C) is measured periodically every 2 - 3 months to determine the average blood-sugar level over the lifespan of the red blood cell. Normal A1C levels should be below 7%. Home tests are also available for measuring A1C.

Urine tests are useful for detecting the presence of ketones. These tests should always be performed during illness or stressful situations, when diabetes is likely to go out of control. The patient should also undergo yearly urine tests for microalbuminuria (small amounts of protein in the urine), a risk factor for future kidney disease.

Long-Term Complications

Type 1 diabetes reduces the normal lifespan by an average of 5 - 8 years. However, survival rates are improving in all ethnic groups and both genders. Longer survival rates are probably due to improvements in monitoring and tighter control of blood glucose. There are two important approaches to preventing complications from type 1 diabetes:

Intensive control of blood glucose and keeping glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels below 7%. This approach is proving to prevent complications due to vascular (blood vessel) abnormalities and nerve damage (neuropathy) that can cause major damage to organs, including the eyes, kidneys, and heart.
Managing risk factors for heart disease. Blood glucose control helps the heart, but it is also very important that people with diabetes control blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and other factors associated with heart disease.

Patients with type 1 diabetes have a 10 times greater risk of heart disease than healthy patients. Heart attacks account for 60% and strokes for 25% of deaths in patients with diabetes. Diabetes affects the heart in many ways:

Both type 1 and 2 diabetes accelerate the progression of atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). Diabetes can adversely affect blood lipid levels by lowering HDL ("good cholesterol") and increasing triglycerides. This can lead to coronary artery disease, heart attack, or stroke.
In type 1 diabetes, high blood pressure (hypertension) usually develops if the kidneys become damaged. High blood pressure is another major cause of heart attack, stroke, and heart failure. Children with diabetes are also at risk for hypertension.
Impaired nerve function (neuropathy) associated with diabetes also causes heart abnormalities. Some experts estimate that the mortality rates from neuropathy-related heart conditions ranges from 15 - 53%.

Atherosclerosis is a disease of the arteries in which fatty material is deposited in the vessel wall, resulting in narrowing and eventual impairment of blood flow. Severely restricted blood flow in the arteries to the heart muscle leads to symptoms such as chest pain. Atherosclerosis shows no symptoms until a complication occurs.

Click the icon to see an image of the kidney.

Results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) prove that intensive blood sugar control reduces the long-term risk of heart disease complications by 50%. The results indicate that intensive blood sugar control is even more important in reducing these risks than blood pressure- and cholesterol-lowering drugs. Original participants in the trial received intensive blood glucose control for 6 years during the 1980s. Researchers continued to follow these patients’ progress during the next 17 years. A follow-up study, published in 2005 in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the benefits of tight blood glucose control persisted over time and halved the risk of heart attack, stroke, angina, or coronary artery disease.

Aspirin for Reducing the Risk for Blood Clots. Taking a daily aspirin reduces the risk for blood clotting and may help protect against heart attacks. In a 2000 study, low-dose aspirin was associated with a 30% lower risk for death from heart disease in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Reducing Blood Pressure. Strict control of blood pressure is critical for preventing complications of diabetes and has proven to improve survival rates. Patients should strive for blood pressure levels of less than 130/80 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic). (Controlling systolic pressure may be especially important for reducing the risk for kidney complications.)

Dozens of anti-hypertensive drugs are available. Most fall into the following categories:

Diuretics rid the body of extra sodium (salt) and water. There are three main types of diuretics: Potassium-sparing, thiazide, and loop.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the production of angiotensin, a chemical that causes arteries to narrow.
Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) block angiotensin.
Beta-blockers block the effects of adrenaline and ease the heart’s pumping action.
Calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) decrease the contractions of the heart and widen blood vessels.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends any of these classes of drugs as first-line treatment for hypertension. New research suggests, however, that beta-blockers are less effective at preventing strokes and heart attacks than other types of blood pressure medications. ACE inhibitors are especially helpful for patients with type 1 diabetes as they may help prevent kidney disease (nephropathy).

Many patients require more than one type of drug to control blood pressure. For patients with diabetes who have microalbuminuria, the ADA strongly recommends ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Microalbuminuria is an accumulation of protein in the blood, which can signal the onset of kidney disease (nephropathy).

Anti-hypertensive drugs that block or reduce angiotensin are the first option for many people with diabetes. Angiotensin is a natural chemical that influences all aspects of blood pressure control and also interferes with insulin's normal metabolic signaling. In fact, angiotensin may be the common factor linking diabetes and high blood pressure.

The 2005 landmark Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) indicated that a thiazide-type diuretic works as well as an ACE inhibitor or CCB for patients with type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure. Compared with ACE inhibitors or CCBs, diuretics appeared to be better at lowering systolic blood pressure and preventing heart failure. In addition, the trial suggested that diuretics are especially helpful for African-Americans, by offering greater protection than ACE inhibitors or CCBS in preventing strokes. [See In-Depth Report #14: High blood pressure.]

Improving Cholesterol and Lipid Levels. Abnormal cholesterol and lipid levels are common in diabetes. High LDL (“bad”) cholesterol should always be lowered, but people with diabetes also often have additional harmful imbalances, including low HDL (“good”) cholesterol and high triglycerides. Patients should aim for LDL levels below 100 mg/dL, HDL levels over 50 mg/dL, and triglyceride levels below 150 mg/dL. Patients with diabetes and existing heart disease should strive for even lower LDL levels; the American Diabetes Association recommends LDL levels below 70 mg/dL for these patients.

Statins are the best cholesterol-lowering drugs. They include atorvastatin (Lipitor), lovastatin (Mevacor and generics), pravastatin (Pravachol), simvastatin (Zocor and generics), fluvastatin (Lescol), and rosuvastatin (Crestor). These drugs are very effective for lowering LDL cholesterol levels. Recent studies indicate that aggressive high-dose statin therapy may be an important treatment approach for high-risk patients who need to substantially lower their LDL levels. A 2006 study found that patients with diabetes and heart disease who were treated with 80 mg daily of atorvastatin had a 25% lower risk of heart attack and stroke than patients who received a 10 mg daily dose.

The primary safety concern with statins has involved myopathy, an uncommon condition that can cause muscle damage and, in some cases, muscle and joint pain. A specific myopathy called rhabdomyolysis can lead to kidney failure. People with diabetes and risk factors for myopathy should be monitored for muscle symptoms.

Although lowering LDL cholesterol is beneficial, statins are not as effective as other medications -- such as fibrates, niacin, ezetimbe, or bile acid sequesters -- in addressing HDL and triglyceride imbalances. This is a common problem in type 2 diabetes. Combining a statin with one of these drugs may be helpful for people with diabetes who have heart disease, low HDL, and near-normal LDL levels. Although combinations of statins and fibrates or niacin increase the risk of myopathy, both combinations are considered safe if used with extra care.

Fibrates, such as gemfibrozil (Lopid) and fenofibrate (Tricor), are usually the first choice. Niacin has the most favorable effect on raising HDL and lowering triglycerides of all the cholesterol drugs. However, about 30% of patients who take high-dose niacin experience increased blood glucose levels. Moderate doses of niacin can achieve lipid control without causing serious blood glucose problems. [See In-Depth Report #23: Cholesterol.]

Kidney disease (nephropathy) is a very serious complication of diabetes. With this condition, the tiny filters in the kidney (called glomeruli) become damaged and leak protein into the urine. Over time this can lead to kidney failure. Urine tests showing microalbuminuria (small amounts of protein in the urine) are important markers for kidney damage.

Treatment and Prevention of Nephropathy. Tight control of blood sugar and blood pressure is essential for preventing the onset of kidney disease. Long-term studies report that strict control of these two conditions produces a 60% reduction in new cases of nephropathy and a delay in progression of the disease. Research indicates that ACE inhibitors are the best class of blood pressure medications for delaying kidney disease and slowing disease progression in patients with type 1 diabetes. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) are also very helpful.

A doctor may recommend a low-protein diet for patients whose kidney disease is progressing despite tight blood sugar and blood pressure control. Protein-restricted diets can help slow disease progression and delay the onset of end-stage renal disease (kidney failure). However, patients with end-stage renal disease who are on dialysis generally require higher amounts of protein. [See In-Depth Report #42: Diabetes diet.]

Diabetic nephropathy, the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), occurs in about 20 - 40% of patients with diabetes. Patients with ESRD have 13 times the risk of death compared to other patients with type 1 diabetes. If the kidneys fail, dialysis is required. Symptoms of kidney failure may include swelling in the feet and ankles, itching, fatigue, and pale skin color. On an encouraging note, a 2005 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that the prognosis of end-stage renal disease has greatly improved during the last 4 decades for patients with type 1 diabetes. The outlook was best for patients who were diagnosed with diabetes at a young age (under 5 years old). In addition, the study found that fewer people with type 1 diabetes are developing ESRD.

Anemia is a common complication of end-stage kidney disease. Patients on dialysis usually require injections of erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs to increase red blood cell counts and control anemia. Patients with end-stage kidney disease should be aware of the current controversies surrounding the dosing of these drugs.

In 2006, two important New England Journal of Medicine studies indicated that aggressive dosing to completely normalize hemoglobin levels does not work better than standard dosing that only partially corrects anemia. In 2007, the FDA issued new warnings on darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) and epoetin alfa (Epogen and Procrit). The warnings describe an increased risk for blood clots, strokes, and heart attacks in patients with end-stage kidney disease when these drugs were given at higher than recommended doses. The FDA has set new dosing and hemoglobin target levels for these drugs.

The FDA recommends that patients with end-stage kidney disease who receive erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs should:

Maintain hemoglobin levels that do not exceed 12 g/dL
Receive frequent blood tests to monitor hemoglobin levels
Contact their doctors if they experience such symptoms as shortness of breath, pain, swelling in the legs, or increases in blood pressure

[See In-Depth Report #57: Anemia.]

Diabetes reduces or distorts nerve function, causing a condition called neuropathy. Neuropathy refers to a group of disorders that affect nerves. The two main types of neuropathy are:

Peripheral (affects nerves in the toes, feet, legs, hand, and arms)
Autonomic (affects nerves that help regulate digestive, bowel, bladder, heart, and sexual function)

Peripheral neuropathy particularly affects sensation. It is a common complication that affects nearly half of people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes after 25 years. The most serious consequences of neuropathy occur in the legs and feet and pose a risk for ulcers and, in very severe cases, amputation. Peripheral neuropathy usually starts in the fingers and toes and moves up to the arms and legs (called a stocking-glove distribution). Symptoms include:

Tingling
Weakness
Burning sensations
Loss of the sense of warm or cold
Numbness (if the nerves are severely damaged, the patient may be unaware that a blister or minor wound has become infected)
Deep pain

Autonomic neuropathy can cause digestive problems (constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting), bladder infections, and erectile dysfunction. In some cases, neuropathy may mask angina, the warning chest pain for heart disease and heart attack. Patients with diabetes should be aware of other warning signs of a heart attack, including sudden fatigue, sweating, shortness of breath, nausea, and vomiting.

Blood sugar control is the only treatment for neuropathy. Studies show that tight control of blood glucose levels delays the onset and slows progression of neuropathy. A 2005 study also suggested that heart disease risk factors can increase the likelihood of developing neuropathy. Lowering triglycerides, losing weight, reducing blood pressure, and quitting smoking may help prevent the onset of neuropathy.

Pain-Relief Treatment for Peripheral Neuropathy. A number of different drugs are used for peripheral neuropathy pain relief: They include:

Nonprescription analgesics, such as aspirin, acetaminophen, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). (Patients with stomach or kidney problems should check with their doctors before using these drugs.)
Prescription painkillers, such as tramadol (Ultram). Tramadol is a drug that is similar to opioids. It can help relieve pain but has significant side effects, including nausea, constipation, and headache.
Topical medications, particularly capsaicin (the active ingredient in hot peppers), are applied to the skin to relieve minor local pain. A 5% lidocaine patch has also shown good results in clinical trials.
Tricyclic antidepressants, such as amitriptyline (Elavil) or doxepin (Sinequan), are effective in reducing pain from neuropathy in up to 75% of patients. A combination of doxepin and capsaicin (applied to the skin) may be particularly beneficial. Unfortunately, tricyclics may cause heart rhythm problems.
Duloxetine (Cymbalta) is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, a newer type of antidepressant, which was approved in 2004 for treatment of pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The anti-convulsant drug pregabalin (Lyrica) was approved in 2004 for neuropathic pain management. It is classified as a controlled substance (like narcotics), which indicates a potential risk for abuse. Other anti-seizure drugs used for peripheral neuropathy pain relief include gabapentin (Neurontin) and valproate (Depakote).

Treatments under investigation include acetyl-l-carnitine and intravenous alpha-lipoic acid. Patients may also benefit from transcutaneous electrostimulation (TENS), a treatment that involves administering mild electrical pulses to painful areas. Alternative treatments such as hypnosis, biofeedback, relaxation techniques, and acupuncture have helped some patients manage pain. Doctors also recommend lifestyle measures, such as walking and wearing elastic stockings.

Treatments for Other Complications of Neuropathy. Neuropathy also impacts other functions, and treatments are needed to reduce their effects. If diabetes affects the nerves in the autonomic nervous system, then abnormalities of blood pressure control and bowel and bladder function may occur. Erythromycin, domperidone (Motilium), or metoclopramide (Reglan) may be used to relieve delayed stomach emptying caused by neuropathy.

Erectile dysfunction is also associated with neuropathy. Studies indicate that phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) drugs, such as sildenafil (Viagra), vardenafil (Levitra), and tadalafil (Cialis), are safe and effective, at least in the short term, for patients with diabetes. Typical side effects are minimal but may include headache, flushing, and upper respiratory tract and flu-like symptoms.

Perhaps the most serious consequences of diabetic neuropathy occur in the lower limbs. An estimated 15% of patients with diabetes experience serious foot problems. They are the leading cause of hospitalizations for these patients.

Diabetes is responsible for more than half of all lower limb amputations performed in the U.S. Each year there are about 88,000 non-injury amputations, 50 - 75% of them due to diabetes. The number is increasing as the prevalence in diabetes type 2 rises. According to a 2005 study in the Lancet, every 30 seconds someone in the world receives a lower limb amputation due to diabetes. About 85% of amputations start with foot ulcers, which develop in about 12% of people with diabetes.

In general, foot ulcers develop from infections, such as those resulting from blood vessel injury. A 2006 study reported that people with diabetes who develop foot infections are 155 times more likely to have an amputation than people who did not develop infections. Foot infections often develop from injuries. Even minor infections can develop into severe complications. Numbness from nerve damage, which is common in diabetes, compounds the danger since the patient may not be aware of injuries. About one-third of foot ulcers occur on the big toe.

A 2003 government survey found that those at higher risk for foot ulcers tend to be people with diabetes who are overweight, smokers, and those with a long history of diabetes. People who have the disease for more than 20 years and are insulin-dependent are at the highest risk. Related conditions that put people at risk include peripheral neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, foot deformities, and a history of ulcers. [See In-Depth Report #102: Peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication.]

Charcot Foot. Charcot foot or Charcot joint (medically referred to as neuropathic arthropathy) occurs in up to 2.5% of people with diabetes. Early changes appear like an infection, with the foot becoming swollen, red, and warm. A seriously affected foot can become deformed. The bones may crack, splinter, and erode, and the joints may shift, change shape, and become unstable. It typically develops in people who have neuropathy to the extent that they cannot feel sensation in the foot and are not aware of an existing injury. Instead of resting an injured foot or seeking medical help, the patient often continues normal activity, causing further damage.

Charcot foot is initially treated with strict immobilization of the foot and ankle; some centers use a cast that allows the patient to move and still protects the foot. A 2001 study in the U.K. concluded that a single dose of pamidronate, a bisphosphonate, reduces bone turnover, symptoms, and disease activity. When the acute phase has passed, patients usually need lifelong protection of the foot using a brace initially and custom footwear.

Measures to Prevent Foot Ulcers. Preventive foot care can significantly reduce the risk of ulcers and amputation. Some tips for preventing problems include:

Patients should inspect their feet daily and watch for changes in color or texture, odor, and firm or hardened areas, which may indicate infection and potential ulcers.
When washing the feet, the water should be warm (not hot) and the feet and areas between the toes should be thoroughly dried afterward. Check water temperature with the hand or a thermometer before stepping in.
Moisturizers should be applied, but not between the toes.
Corns and calluses should be gently pumiced and toenails trimmed short and the edges filed to avoid cutting adjacent toes.
Patients should not use medicated pads or try to shave the corns or calluses themselves.
Well-fitting footwear is very important. People should be sure the shoe is wide enough; according to a 2001 study, 30% of patients with diabetes wear shoes that are too narrow. Patients should also avoid high heels, sandals, thongs, and going barefoot. Shoes with a rocker sole (LucRo) reduce pressure under the heel and front of the foot by 35 - 65% and may be particularly helpful. Custom-molded boots increase the surface area over which foot pressure is distributed. This reduces stress on the ulcers and allows them to heal.
Shoes should be changed often during the day.
Wear socks, particularly with extra padding (which can be specially purchased).
Patients should avoid tight stockings or any clothing that constricts the legs and feet.
Foot pain, numbness, or tingling is worse at night; diphenhydramine (Benadryl) may help.
A specialist in foot care should be consulted for any problems.

Click the icon to see an image of foot inspection.

Treating Foot Ulcers in Diabetes. About one-third of foot ulcers will heal within 20 weeks with good wound care treatments. Some treatments are as follows:

Antibiotics are generally given. In some cases, hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics for up to 28 days may be needed for severe foot ulcers.
In virtually all cases, wound care requires debridement, which is the removal of injured tissue until only healthy tissue remains. Debridement may be accomplished using chemical (enzymes), surgical, or mechanical (irrigation) means.
Hydrogels (Nu-Gel, Intrasite Gel, Scherisorb, Clearsite, Duoderm, Geliperm) are helpful in healing ulcers and are noninvasive and soothing.
Felted foam may be helpful in healing ulcers on the sole of the foot. Felted foam uses a multi-layered foam pad over the bottom of the foot with an opening over the ulcer.

Other Treatments for Foot Ulcers. Doctors are also using or investigating other treatments to heal ulcers. These include:

Administering hyperbaric oxygen (oxygen given at high pressure) is showing promise in promoting healing. In one study, patients who had had ulcers that had not responded to treatment for over 3 months received daily treatments that lasted 90 minutes for 2 weeks. About 15 days after completion, patients who received oxygen had significant reduction in ulcers, sometimes with complete healing. Other studies are also demonstrating good results.
Monochromatic near-infrared photo energy (MIRE) uses light therapy to improve sensation in the feet of patients with peripheral neuropathy.
Total-contact casting (TCC) uses a cast that is designed to match the exact contour of the foot and to distribute weight along the entire length of the foot. It is usually changed weekly. It may be helpful for ulcer healing and for Charcot foot. Although it is very effective in healing ulcers, recurrence is common.

Diabetes accounts for 12,000 - 24,000 of new cases of blindness annually and is the leading cause of new cases of blindness in adults ages 20 - 74. The most common eye disorder in diabetes is retinopathy. People with diabetes are also at higher risk for developing cataracts and certain types of glaucoma. [See In-Depth Report #26: Cataracts and In-Depth Report #25: Glaucoma.]

Description of Retinopathy. Retinopathy is a condition in which the retina becomes damaged. The two primary abnormalities that occur are a weakening of the blood vessels in the retina and the obstruction in the capillaries -- probably from very tiny blood clots. Retinopathy generally occurs in one or two phases:

Click the icon to see an image of diabetic retinopathy.

The early and more common type of this disorder is called nonproliferative or background retinopathy. The blood vessels in the retina are abnormally weakened. They rupture and leak, and waxy areas may form. If these processes affect the central portion of the retina, swelling may occur, causing reduced or blurred vision.
If the capillaries become blocked and blood flow is cut off, soft, "woolly" areas may develop in the retina's nerve layer. These woolly areas may signal the development of proliferative retinopathy. Often there are no symptoms of progressing retinopathy. In this more severe condition, new abnormal blood vessels form and grow on the surface of the retina. They may spread into the cavity of the eye or bleed into the back of the eye. Major hemorrhage or retinal detachment can result, causing severe visual loss or blindness. The sensation of seeing flashing lights may indicate retinal detachment.

According to a 2003 study, about 40% of young adults with type 1 diabetes had developed retinopathy within 10 years of diagnosis. (Although this rate is high, it is significantly lower than in previous years when blood glucose control was not as strict.) The risk is lower in patients with type 2, although in one study over 20% had signs of retinopathy 6 years after diagnosis. In general, all patients with diabetes should have a yearly eye examination. Patients with no signs of retinal damage or low risk factors for retinopathy may only require screening every 2 - 3 years.

Click the icon to see an animation on diabetic retinopathy.

Prevention of Retinopathy. Fortunately, severe and even moderate vision loss is largely preventable with tight control of blood glucose levels. (Intense glucose control can cause early worsening of retinopathy, although this is nearly always counterbalanced by long-term benefits.) Tight control of blood pressure can also help protect against retinopathy. Aspirin therapy does not help prevent retinopathy.

Treatment of Retinopathy. Patients with severe diabetic retinopathy or macular edema (swelling of the retina) should be sure to see an eye specialist who is experienced in the management and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Once damage to the eye develops, laser eye surgery may be needed. Laser surgery can help reduce vision loss in high-risk patients.

Studies indicate that patients with type 2 diabetes face a higher than average risk of developing dementia caused either by Alzheimer's disease or problems in blood vessels in the brain. Problems in attention and memory can occur even in people under age 55 who have had diabetes for a number of years. In one study of people with type 1 diabetes, high glucose levels (hyperglycemia) were associated with slower brain function, including less verbal fluency and slow ability to do mental arithmetic.

Respiratory Infections. People with diabetes face a higher risk for influenza and its complications, including pneumonia, possibly because the disorder neutralizes the effects of protective proteins on the surface of the lungs. In fact, deaths among people with diabetes increase by 5 - 15% during flu epidemics, and they are six times more likely to be hospitalized with complications from flu than nondiabetic patients who have flu. Everyone with diabetes should have annual influenza vaccinations and a vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia.

Urinary Tract Infections. Women with diabetes face a significantly higher risk for urinary tract infections, which are likely to be more complicated and difficult to treat than in the general population.

Diabetes doubles the risk for depression. Furthermore, depression, in turn, increases the risk for hyperglycemia and complications of diabetes, according to one study. Restoring mental health, both through medication and psychotherapy, not only improves quality of life but may help patients control their blood sugar levels.

Diabetes changes bone quality and density, but the effects differ depending on type:

Type 1 diabetes is associated with a slightly reduced bone density, putting patients at risk for osteoporosis and possibly fractures. The best medications for bone loss in patients with diabetes are bisphosphonates, such as alendronate (Fosamax) and risedronate (Actonel). They not only help prevent bone loss but may even reduce daily insulin requirements in patients taking insulin. [See In-Depth Report #18: Osteoporosis.]
Type 2 diabetes, on the other hand, is associated with an increased bone density but is also associated with fractures. In such cases, the bone quality itself may be impaired.

Older patients with either type of diabetes are at risk for falling, which compounds the risk for fracture.

Diabetes increases the risk for other conditions, including:

Hearing loss
Periodontal disease
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, also called nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); a particular danger for people who are obese
Colorectal cancer
Uterine cancer

Diabetes and Pregnancy. Both temporary diabetes that occurs during pregnancy (gestational diabetes) and pregnancy in a patient with existing diabetes can increase the risk for birth defects. Studies indicate that high blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia) may affect the developing fetus as soon as it is conceived.

Because glucose crosses the placenta, a woman with diabetes can pass high levels of blood glucose to the fetus. In response, the fetus secretes large amounts of insulin. This combination of high fetal blood levels of insulin and glucose can have significant effects:

Excessive fetal weight gain, which can lead to complications during delivery
Birth defects
Breathing problems and delayed lung development
Low blood sugar
Higher future risk for obesity and diabetes

In addition to endangering the fetus, diabetes also presents risks to the pregnant woman, particularly preeclampsia, which is a potentially dangerous condition involving very high blood pressure during pregnancy. Pregnant women with diabetes are also at greater risk for retinopathy.

Some recommendations for preventing complications include:

Intensive blood sugar control during pregnancy may reduce the risk for problems in the infant.
Monitoring blood glucose after meals may protect against preeclampsia more effectively than monitoring before meals.
Aerobic exercise before and during pregnancy can lower glucose levels. (All pregnant women, particularly those with diabetes, should check with their doctors before embarking on a rigorous exercise regimen.)
To prevent birth defects that affect the heart and nervous system, women with diabetes should take a higher dose of folic acid from the time of conception up to week 12 of pregnancy. They should also be checked for any heart problems.
Women with diabetes should have an eye examination during pregnancy and up to a year afterward.

Although there was some concern that short-acting insulin lispro might increase the risk for birth defects, the most recent evidence suggests that it does not. In fact, some experts believe it achieves a better outcome and should be preferred to regular insulin in pregnant women. More research is needed.

Effect on Estrogen. Diabetes appears to blunt some of the effects of estrogen, which may increase the risk for heart disease. Women with diabetes have a higher risk for early menopause, which, in one study, occurred at an average age of about 41 years.

Reproductive Cancers. Women with type 1 diabetes often have lumps in the breast that are benign but which make mammograms difficult to interpret. It is not clear whether these lumps are risk factors for breast cancer. One study indicated that women with diabetes have a higher risk for endometrial cancer and possibly for breast cancer.

Lack of Blood Glucose Control. Control of blood glucose levels is generally very poor in adolescents and young adults. Adolescents with diabetes are at higher risk than adults for ketoacidosis resulting from noncompliance. In a British study of young adults with type 1 diabetes, 15% were already hypertensive, and about half of these young people had signs of kidney damage. Young people who do not control glucose are also at high risk for permanent damage in small vessels, such as those in the eyes.

Self-Destructive Behaviors. One study found that young people with diabetes have a higher than average rate of suicidal fantasies. Although the actual rate of suicide was no higher than that of their nondiabetic peers, such thoughts are strongly associated with self-destructive behavior.

Of particular note, up to one-third of young women with type 1 diabetes have eating disorders and under-use insulin to lose weight. Anorexia and bulimia pose significant health dangers in any young person -- but they can be especially severe in people with diabetes.

Transplantation Procedures

Major advances in islet-cell transplantation are allowing more patients to come off insulin or reduce their use of it.

Major clinical trials are now using a specific islet-cell (also called beta-cell) transplantation procedure called the Edmonton protocol, which usually involves the following steps:

As soon as there are sufficient numbers of islets available for transplantation, the patient is given intravenous antibiotics and oral vitamins E, B6, and A.
A machine isolates islet cells taken from donor pancreases, generally from cadavers. Two or three organs are usually needed in order to supply enough islet cells to have any effect on insulin production. (This is a major limitation of the procedure.)
Once the islets have been isolated, they are injected directly in a major vein in the patient's liver.
The islets are carried to capillaries in the liver where they produce insulin.
Specific drugs, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, or rapamycin (Rapamume), are used to suppress the immune system. (Unlike immunosuppressant drugs used in other transplantation procedures, these drugs do not contain steroids, which destroy islet cells.) Immunosuppressants are needed for the rest of the patient's life so that the body does not reject these foreign islet cells.
The procedure has to be performed two or more times over a period of 2 - 3 months. This generally requires multiple pancreas donors in order to achieve complete independence from insulin therapy. This is a major limitation to the procedure.

In 2006, the New England Journal of Medicine published the results of the first multicenter trial of the Edmonton protocol. The results indicated that this treatment may benefit some patients with severe type 1 diabetes. Of the 36 patients who underwent the transplant procedure, 44% no longer needed insulin injections a year after the final treatment. However, two-thirds of these insulin-independent patients needed to resume insulin injections within 2 years.

The Edmonton protocol achieved partial islet function in 28% of patients, which helped control hypoglycemic unawareness, a serious complication of diabetes. (In hypoglycemic unawareness, patients no longer recognize the symptoms of severe low blood sugar.) Even though these patients still needed insulin shots, they had better control of their diabetes. Researchers are continuing to work on refining the Edmonton protocol so that its benefits can be more sustainable and long lasting.

A major obstacle for the islet cell transplantation is the need for two or more donor pancreases to supply sufficient islet cells. Unfortunately, there are not enough pancreases available to make this procedure feasible for even 1% of patients. Researchers, then, are looking for alternative sources for islet cells. In one center, for example, researchers used pig islet cells as the donor source in children and did not administer immunosuppressant drugs. Half the children responded well to this approach. Another study reported that select patients may require only one donor.

Other research is focusing on umbilical cord cells, embryonic or adult stem cells, bone marrow transplantation, and other types of cellular therapies. These studies are still in very early stages, but experts predict that there will be major research advances in these fields in the coming years. A small, preliminary study published in 2007 in the Journal of the American MedicalAssociation looked at the effects of autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHST) in patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. AHST is an experimental treatment for type 1 diabetes. It involves treating a patient with high doses of drugs to suppress the immune system, then harvesting the patient’s own blood cells and re-infusing them back into the body. In the study, 14 out of 15 patients who underwent AHST were able to stop taking insulin shots.

Whole pancreas transplants and double transplants of pancreases and kidneys are proving to have a good long-term success rate for some patients with type 1 diabetes. The operations help to prevent further kidney damage, and long-term studies indicate that they may even eventually reverse some existing damage. There is some evidence that heart disease and diabetic neuropathy improve after pancreas transplantation (although not retinopathy). One 10-year study reported that survival rate at 10 years was 76%, and two-thirds of the patients had both pancreas and kidney function. Immunosuppressive drugs are needed lifelong with this procedure. Experts generally recommend transplants in cases of end-stage kidney failure or when diabetes poses more of a threat to the patient's life than the transplant itself.

Uncontrolled diabetes causes damage to many tissues of the body, including the kidneys. Kidney damage caused by diabetes most often involves thickening and hardening of the internal kidney structures. Strict blood glucose control may delay the progression of kidney disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetics.

Prevention

Fingerstick blood tests are now available that can test for autoantibodies that identify children who are at high risk for developing type 1 diabetes. At this time, however, there is no way to prevent type 1 diabetes, and all preventive therapies are investigative. Until there are ways to prevent the condition, such screening tests are expensive and provide little value.

Investigational approaches focus on preventing type 1 diabetes or at least delaying it as long as possible. Preventive measures are sometimes defined as primary and secondary:

Primary prevention attempts to preserve all beta cells before the disease process starts.
Secondary prevention aims to deter further beta cell destruction once it has started and before symptoms arise.

For primary prevention, one experimental approach involves oral insulin, which is taken as a pill once a day. Unlike insulin injections that lower blood sugar, oral insulin does not affect blood glucose levels because it is quickly broken down in the digestive system. It may, however, help calm the immune system and prevent its attack on beta cells. Another study is exploring whether docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid, can help prevent development of autoimmune type 1 diabetes in newborns who are at high risk for the disease.

Secondary prevention focuses on preserving beta cells and their insulin-producing function. Researchers are exploring several treatments for patients who are newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. These experimental therapies include:

Rituximab (Rituxan), a monoclonal antibody drug used for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, is being studied in patients with type 1 diabetes for its effects on disrupting the immune system’s attack on beta cells.
Immune-suppressing drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) alone or in combination with daclizumab (DZB), are used to prevent rejection in organ transplantation. Researchers hope that these drugs may be able to slow or stop the autoimmune disease process of type 1 diabetes.
CD3-antibody drug therapy is showing promise in retaining newly diagnosed patients’ natural insulin production and decreasing their need for insulin therapy.

Resources

www.diabetes.org -- American Diabetes Association
www.niddk.nih.gov -- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
www.jdrf.org -- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
www.nei.nih.gov -- National Eye Institute
www.eatright.org -- American Dietetic Association
www.kidney.org -- National Kidney Foundation
www.diabetestrialnet.org -- Type 1 Diabetes International Clinical Trial Net
www.medicalert.org -- Bracelets or neck chain emblems with personal medical information
www.childrenwithdiabetes.com -- Children with diabetes online community

References

American Diabetes Association (ADA). Standards of medical care in diabetes. VI. Prevention and management of diabetes complications. Diabetes Care. 2007 Jan;30(Suppl 1):S15-24.

Drueke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt KU, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, et al. Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2071-84.

Hakonarson H, Grant SFA, Bradfield JP, Marchand L, Kim CE, Glessner JT, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies KIAA0350 as a type 1 diabetes gene. Nature. Published online 15 July 2007.

SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group , Liese AD, D'Agostino RB, Hamman RF, Kilgo PD, Lawrence JM, et al. The burden of diabetes mellitus among US youth: prevalence estimates from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1510-8.

Shapiro AM, Ricordi C, Hering BJ, Auchincloss H, Lindblad R, Robertson RP, et al. International trial of the Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1318-30.

Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, et al. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2085-98.

Skyler JS. Cellular therapy for type 1 diabetes: has the time come? JAMA. 2007 Apr 11;297(14):1599-600.

Vardi M, Nini A. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002187.

Voltarelli JC, Couri CE, Stracieri AB, Oliveira MC, Moraes DA, Pieroni F, et al. Autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2007 Apr 11;297(14):1568-76.

Writing Group for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group , Dabelea D, Bell RA, D'Agostino RB, Imperatore G, Johansen JM, et al. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA. 2007 Jun 27;297(24):2716-24.

Review Date:
7/19/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase

admin — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:13:26 -0700

Overview

Definition
Alternative Names
How the test is performed
How to prepare for the test
How the test will feel
Why the test is performed
Normal Values
What abnormal results mean
What the risks are
Special considerations

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Definition

Galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase is a blood test that measures the level of a substance called GALT, which helps break down milk sugars (lactose/galactose).

Alternative Names

Galactosemia screen; GALT; Gal-1-PUT

How the test is performed

Blood is drawn from a vein, usually from the inside of the elbow or the back of the hand. The site is cleaned with germ-killing medicine (antiseptic). The health care provider wraps an elastic band around the upper arm to apply pressure to the area and make the vein swell with blood.

Next, the health care provider gently inserts a needle into the vein. The blood collects into an airtight vial or tube attached to the needle. The elastic band is removed from your arm.

Once the blood has been collected, the needle is removed, and the puncture site is covered to stop any bleeding.

In infants or young children, a sharp tool called a lancet may be used to puncture the skin and make it bleed. The blood collects into a small glass tube called a pipette, or onto a slide or test strip. A bandage may be placed over the area if there is any bleeding.

How to prepare for the test

For help preparing your baby for the test, see infant test or procedure preparation (birth to 1 year).

How the test will feel

When the needle is inserted to draw blood, some infants feel moderate pain, while others feel only a prick or stinging sensation. Afterward, there may be some throbbing.

Why the test is performed

This is a screening test for galactosemia.

In normal diets, most galactose comes from the breakdown (metabolism) of lactose, which is found in milk and dairy products. About 1 out of 65,000 newborns lack a substance (enzyme) called GALT. Without this substance, the body can't break down galactose, and the substance builds up in the blood. Continued use of milk products can lead to failure to thrive, as well as cataracts, jaundice, liver enlargement, cirrhosis, and mental retardation.

Normal Values

The normal range is 18.5 to 28.5 U/g Hb (units per gram of hemoglobin).

It is important to note that normal values vary from laboratory to laboratory.

What abnormal results mean

An abnormal result suggests galactosemia. Further tests must be done to confirm the diagnosis.

If your child has galactosemia, a genetics specialist should be consulted promptly. The child should immediately be placed on a no-milk diet. This means no breast milk and no animal milk. Soy milk and infant soy formulas are generally used as substitutes. For more detailed information, see the article on galactosemia.

What the risks are

Veins and arteries vary in size from one patient to another and from one side of the body to the other. Obtaining a blood sample from some people may be more difficult than from others.

Other risks associated with having blood drawn are slight but may include:

Excessive bleeding
Fainting or feeling light-headed
Hematoma (blood accumulating under the skin)
Infection (a slight risk any time the skin is broken)

Special considerations

Early diagnosis is important, since the disease can be treated by removing milk from the diet.

Some states require that all newborns be screened for this disorder. These screening tests are set to be very sensitive so they do not miss many infants with galactosemia. Because of this, false-positives can occur. If your child has an abnormal screening result, follow-up tests must be done to confirm the result.

See: Newborn screening tests

Review Date: 6/24/2007

Reviewed By: Chad Haldeman-Englert, MD, Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospitalof Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. Review provided by VeriMed HealthcareNetwork.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Source Doc: 1_003636

Menopause

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:57 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Complications
Symptoms
Lifestyle Changes
Medications
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Black Cohosh Doesn’t Help Hot Flashes

The herbal remedy black cohosh is no better than placebo for treating hot flashes and night sweats, according to a 2006 study in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Most complementary and alternative medicines are ineffective for relieving menopausal symptoms, according to a 2006 review in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)

Short-term use of HRT remains an option for recently menopausal women who have a low risk for stroke, according to a 2007 statement from the North American Menopause Society (NAMS). However, NAMS recommends that women who are at risk for heart disease or breast cancer should consider other approaches for managing hot flashes.
For women who want to discontinue HRT, gradually tapering off the medication or stopping it abruptly appears to make little difference in the recurrence of symptoms, suggests a 2006 study. A gradual approach may delay the reappearance of symptoms, but does not prevent them from returning.

HRT and Heart Disease: Timing Counts

Women who begin HRT within 10 years of menopause have a much lower risk for heart disease and heart attack than women who start HRT later on, indicates a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Experts suggest that HRT is relatively safe for younger women (under age 60) but should not be used by older women. HRT should never be used for prevention of heart disease, and HRT increases the risk for stroke regardless of a woman’s age or when she begins taking it.

HRT and Cancer

A dramatic fall in breast cancer rates has accompanied the decline in HRT use, according to a 2007 study in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Women who use HRT for more than 5 years have a 20% greater risk of developing and dying from ovarian cancer than women who have never used HRT, indicates a 2007 Lancet study of nearly 1 million women.

Introduction

The ovaries contain 200,000 - 400,000 follicles, tiny sacks that contain the materials needed to produce mature eggs, or ova. The ovaries produce two major female hormones: estrogen and progesterone.

Estrogen. Estrogens have an effect on about 300 different tissues throughout a woman's body:

They are essential for the reproductive process and for the development of the female organs.
Estrogens determine the characteristic female distribution of body fat on the hips and thighs, which develops during adolescence.
They also are involved in tissues in the central nervous system (including the brain), the bones, the liver, and the urinary tract.

Estrogen has different forms:

The most potent form is estradiol.
The other important, but less powerful, estrogens are estrone and estriol.

Most of the estrogens in the body are produced by the ovaries, but they can also be formed by other tissues, such as body fat, skin, and muscle.

Progesterone. Progesterone, the other major female hormone, is necessary for thickening and preparing the uterine lining for the fertilized egg.

As a woman ages, her supply of eggs declines. Menopause occurs naturally after the woman's supply of follicles has been depleted and menstruation ends completely. (Menopause may also be induced if the ovaries are surgically removed.)

Perimenopause. Menopause does not occur suddenly. A period called perimenopause usually begins a few years before the last menstrual cycle. Some experts believe there are three stages in the transition:

Early Stage. The beginning of perimenopause can begin in some women in their 30s, but most often it starts between ages 40 - 44. It is marked by changes in menstrual flow and in the length of the cycle. There may be sudden surges in estrogen.
Middle Stage. In the middle cycle, periods become irregular but they are not skipped.
Late Stage. In the late stages, women begin missing the periods until they finally stop. About 6 months before menopause estrogen levels drop significantly. The fall in estrogen triggers the typical symptoms of vaginal dryness and hot flashes (which can last from half a year to more than 5 years after onset of menopause).

Menopause. At the point at which menopause occurs, the following hormonal changes occur:

Ovarian secretion of estrogen and progesterone ends.
Once the ovaries have stopped producing estrogens, however, they still continue to produce small amounts of the male hormone testosterone, which can be converted to estrogen (estradiol) in body fat.
In addition, the adrenal gland continues to produce androstenedione (a male hormone), which is converted to estrone and estradiol in the body fat.

Click the icon to see an image of the adrenal glands.

The total estrogen produced after menopause, however, is far less than that produced during a woman's reproductive years.

The average age of women at menopause today is 51.4 years although it can occur as early as age 40 to as late as the early 60s. Women now have a life expectancy of more than 80 years. Currently, women can expect to live some 30 or 40 years of their life in the postmenopausal state.

Menopause is not a disease. However, many conditions are associated with estrogen depletion, including heart disease, osteoporosis, and other complications. Fortunately, effective treatments are available for these conditions.

In a number of studies, most women have reported menopause as a positive experience and have welcomed it with relief and as a sign of a new stage in life.

Complications

After a woman reaches menopause, her average life expectancy is 30 - 40 years. During those years, however, she faces certain health risks due to lower levels of estrogen that cause accelerated bone loss and an increase in LDL cholesterol (the so-called bad cholesterol). Her risks for serious disorders are estimated at 46% for heart disease, 20% for stroke, and 15% for hip fracture. In addition, about 8% of people over 75 have dementia, with postmenopausal women having 1.4 - 3 times the risk for Alzheimer's disease compared to men.

Heart disease is the number one killer of women. In 2003, more than 480,000 women died from diseases of the heart and circulation (cardiovascular diseases). Although young women have a much lower risk for cardiovascular disease than young men, after menopause women catch up. After age 51, women’s risk of dying from heart disease is very close to that of men. Estrogen loss is believed to play a major role in this increased risk.

Some studies indicate that women who reach menopause at an early age are at increased risk of heart disease. However, recent research suggests that the reverse may also be true. A 2006 study suggested that women who have heart disease risk factors (smoking, high total cholesterol levels, high blood pressure) during premenopause may enter menopause earlier than women with healthier heart profiles. [See In-Depth Report #3: Coronary artery disease.]

Estrogen has the following effects:

Harmful Effects on Cholesterol and Other Lipids (Fats in the Blood). About 2 years before menopause, as estrogen levels begin to decline, the levels of the harmful low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol begin to rise, and the advantageous high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels decrease.
Positive Effect on Blood Flow. Estrogen has significant effects on smoothing, relaxing, and opening blood vessels, thereby increasing blood flow and reducing pressure.
Antioxidant Actions. Estrogen is also an antioxidant. That is, it helps clean up particles called oxygen-free radicals that are released by natural chemical processes in the body, which can cause significant damage, including harm to the arteries.
Mixed Effects on Blood Pressure. The effects of estrogen on blood pressure are not clear. Oral contraceptives, for instance, which contain estrogen, appear to increase pressure slightly.

Blood pressure is the force applied against the walls of the arteries as the heart pumps blood through the body. The pressure is determined by the force and amount of blood pumped and the size and flexibility of the arteries.

Mixed Effects on Blood Clotting. Estrogen affects many blood-clotting factors in the liver: It reduces blood viscosity (stickiness) and may enhance fibrinolysis, the natural process for breaking down blood clots. Unfortunately, estrogen also has other actions that increase the risk for blood clots. Women who take hormone replacement therapy are at risk for thromboembolism -- blood clots that block a vessel.

Click the icon to see an image of thromboembolism.

This action may explain the higher rates of adverse heart events now observed in women with heart disease who take HRT.

Osteoporosis is a disease of the skeleton in which bones become brittle and prone to fracture. In other words, the bone loses density. At age 65, about 30% of women have osteoporosis, and nearly all of them are unaware of their condition. After age 80, up to 70% of women develop osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for fracture in the spine and hip. The lifetime risk of spinal fracture in women is about 1 in 3 and that for hip fracture is 1 in 6. Furthermore, between 10 - 20% of women who experience a hip fracture die within a year and about 25% require nursing home treatment.

Click the icon to see an image of osteoporosis.

Experts are still puzzled by the extreme speed-up of bone breakdown (resorption) after menopause. Estrogen may have an impact on bone density in various ways:

Estrogen's most important effect on osteoporosis appears to be prevention of bone break down (resorption). Some research suggests that estrogen may control the lifespan of osteoclasts, the cells responsible for bone breakdown.
Part of estrogen's beneficial actions may involve maintaining normal levels of vitamin D, an important nutrient in bone protection.

Risk factors for osteoporosis include:

Being tall and thin
Being Caucasian
Smoking
Taking thyroid hormone
Being sedentary
Early menopause or surgical menopause (removal of ovaries)

Women at risk for osteoporosis should have a bone density test to measure their bone mass and then make a decision about treatment after consulting their doctor. [See In-Depth Report #18:Osteoporosis.]

Depression may occur as a woman transitions into menopause (perimenopause), even among women with no history of clinical depression. Hormonal changes and declines in estrogen levels are probably involved in this process. Research suggests that a depressive disorder is 2.5 times more likely to develop during perimenopause than premenopause. Women who transition to menopause at a younger age are at increased risk of a first episode of depression.

Symptoms of clinical depression include:

Loss of interest or pleasure in activities once enjoyed
Persistent (longer than 2 weeks) sad mood
Decreased energy
Sleep problems (insomnia or oversleeping)
Feelings of guilt, worthlessness, and hopelessness
Difficulty concentrating

Some of these symptoms may overlap with other symptoms that typically accompany perimenopause. Women who experience these symptoms should talk to their doctor. Depression is treatable. [See In-Depth Report #8: Depression.] For many women, depression eases once they reach menopause.

Estrogen, the primary female hormone, appears to have properties that protect against the memory loss and lower mental functioning associated with normal aging. Estrogen's effects on the brain include:

Laboratory studies suggested that estrogen may help block production of beta-amyloid, the source of the sticky plaques found in Alzheimer's brains.
Estrogen may trigger the temporary growth of nerve pathways in the memory portion of the brain.
Estrogen may stimulate production of the neurotransmitters acetylcholine and serotonin, which are depleted in Alzheimer's patients.
Estrogen also appears to smooth, relax, and open blood vessels, which may help blood flow in the brain.
Estrogen is an antioxidant. That is, it helps clean up free-oxygen radicals, the unstable particles thought to play a role in Alzheimer's.
Studies have been mixed on the association between natural estrogen levels and mental functioning in older women.

Estrogen therapy has been associated with reduced gum bleeding and with decreased bone loss around the teeth, and women who take estrogen are less likely to lose their teeth. Thus, the same principle that helps prevent bone loss in osteoporosis is also at work in preventing bone loss in the mouth.

Estrogen, progesterone, or both appear to protect against cataracts.

Click the icon to see an image of a cataract.

Studies also indicate that estrogen helps prevent glaucoma and macular degeneration.

Click the icon to see an image of glaucoma.

Click the icon to see an image of macular degeneration.

The drop in body estrogen levels brought on by menopause may contribute to both urinary stress and urge incontinence.

Women are at increased risk for recurrent urinary tract infections after menopause. Research suggests that estrogen may prevent infection by increasing the number of lactobacilli, a microorganism that fights infection by preventing bacteria from adhering to vaginal cells.

Estrogen may help prevent slackness and dryness in the skin and reduce wrinkles.

Menopause is associated with more sleeping problems, including inability to fall asleep and nighttime wakefulness.

Symptoms

The most prominent symptoms of the transition to menopause include:

Hot flashes and night sweats. Women often experience hot flashes as an intense build-up in body heat, followed by sweating and chills. Some women report accompanying anxiety as the sensation builds. In most cases, hot flashes resolve within 2 years of menopause, although in some women they may persist for years. Women who have a hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) are less likely to experience hot flashes than women who have a natural menopause. However, women who have surgical removal of both ovaries, and who do not receive hormone replacement therapy, may have more severe hot flashes than women who enter menopause naturally.
Heart pounding or racing can occur, with or without hot flashes.
Difficulty sleeping. Insomnia is common during perimenopause. It may be caused by the hot flashes or it may be an independent symptom of hormonal changes. A 2006 study indicated that severe hot flashes are frequently associated with chronic insomnia.
Mood changes. Mood changes are most likely to be a combination of sleeplessness, hormonal swings, and psychological factors as a woman undergoes this intense passage in her life. Once a woman has reached a menopausal state, however, depression is no more common than before, and women with a history of premenstrual depression often experience significant mood improvement.
Sexuality. Sexual responsiveness tends to decline in most women after menopause, although other aspects of sexual function, including interest, frequency, and vaginal dryness vary. It is useful to remember that the symptoms of menopause eventually go away.
Forgetfulness. This appears to be one of the few symptoms that are common across most cultural and ethnic groups.
Urine leakage.
Vaginal dryness.
Joint stiffness.

Women from different ethnic and or cultural groups report different menopausal symptoms. For example, in one study hot flashes occurred in about 30% of Caucasians and 45% of African-Americans. Hispanic women tended to complain of urine leakage, vaginal dryness, and heart pounding. Japanese and Chinese women experienced far fewer menopausal symptoms, except for forgetfulness. All groups complained about this symptom.

Lifestyle Changes

Simple changes in lifestyle and diet can help control menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes. Avoid hot flash triggers like spicy foods, hot beverages, caffeine, and alcohol. Dress in layers so that clothes can be removed when a hot flash occurs. For vaginal dryness, moisturizers, and non-estrogen lubricants, such as KY Jelly, Replens, and Astroglide are available.

When women reach menopause, they are at increased risk for heart disease. A heart-healthy diet is an important way to control cholesterol and blood pressure levels. [See In-Depth Report #42: Heart-healthy diet.]

In 2007, the American Heart Association (AHA) issued revised diet and lifestyle recommendations. The current guidelines recommend:

Balancing calorie intake and physical activity to achieve or maintain a healthy body weight. (Controlling weight, quitting smoking, and exercising regularly are essential companions of any diet program. Try to get at least 30 minutes, and preferably 60 – 90 minutes, of daily exercise.)
Consuming a diet rich in a variety of vegetables and fruits. Vegetables and fruits that are deeply colored (spinach, carrots, peaches, berries) are especially recommended as they have the highest micronutrient content.
Choosing whole-grain, high-fiber foods. These include fruits, vegetables, and legumes (beans). Good whole grain choices include whole wheat, oats/oatmeal, rye, barley, brown rice, buckwheat, bulgur, millet, and quinoa.
Eating fish, especially oily fish, at least twice a week (about 8 ounces/week). Oily fish such as salmon, mackerel, and sardines are rich in the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Consumption of these fatty acids is linked to a reduced risk of sudden death and death from coronary artery disease. Women with existing heart disease may also consider taking a daily dietary supplement of 850 – 1,000 mg of EPA and DHA.
Limiting daily intake of saturated fat (found mostly in animal products) to less than 7% of total calories, trans fat (found in hydrogenated fats, commercially baked products, and many fast foods) to less than 1% of total calories, and cholesterol (found in eggs, dairy products, meat, poultry, fish, shellfish) to less than 300 mg per day. Choose lean meats and vegetable alternatives (such as soy). Select fat-free and low-fat dairy products. Grill, bake, or broil fish, meat, and skinless poultry.
Using little or no salt in your foods. Reducing salt can lower blood pressure and decrease the risk of heart disease and heart failure.
Cutting down on beverages and foods that contain added sugars (corn syrups, sucrose, glucose, fructose, maltrose, dextrose, concentrated fruit juice, honey).
If you consume alcohol, do so in moderation. The AHA recommends limiting alcohol to no more than 1 drink per day for women.
The AHA does not recommend antioxidant supplements (such as vitamin E, C, or beta carotene) or folic acid supplements for prevention of heart disease.

Soy is an excellent food. It is rich in both soluble and insoluble fiber, omega-3 fatty acids, and provides all essential proteins. Soy proteins have more vitamins and minerals than meat or dairy proteins. They also contain polyunsaturated fats, which are better than the saturated fat found in meat. The best sources of soy protein are soy products (tofu, soy milk, soybeans).

For many years, soy was promoted as a food that could help lower cholesterol and improve heart disease risk factors. But an important 2006 review of studies found that soy protein and isoflavone supplement pills do not really have any effects on cholesterol or heart disease prevention. The AHA still recommends soy foods, but not supplements, as a healthy food choice. The benefits of soy on menopausal symptoms are mixed, according to research (see below in Alternative Therapies). A 2006 study reported that increased soy intake does not help reduce the frequency or severity of hot flashes and night sweats.

Soy is high in estrogen-like plant chemicals called isoflavones, which may improve bone health in older women. A 2005 review of 15 clinical trials found that, although the results were mixed, isoflavones appeared to decrease bone loss, especially in younger postmenopausal women. Soy food products, such as tofu, that also contain calcium may be particularly beneficial.

A combination of calcium and vitamin D is important for helping to prevent bone loss. [See In-Depth Report #18: Osteoporosis.]

Calcium. Women should be sure they have sufficient calcium and vitamin D in their diet by consuming low-fat dairy products or calcium-enriched orange juice. Calcium supplements may be another option for some women. For calcium supplements, calcium citrate (Citracal) is better absorbed than calcium carbonate (Tums, Os-Cal) and other types of calcium compounds. Calcium citrate was the first calcium supplement reported to preserve bone density after menopause.

Click the icon to see an image of the benefits of calcium.

The standard recommended calcium dose for adults age 50 years and older is 1,000 – 1,500 mg per day, depending on risk factors. High doses (over 2,500 mg per day) of calcium supplements may increase the risk for kidney stones. (Because many commercial foods are now fortified with calcium, this upper limit may be easier to reach than people think.)

Click the icon to see an image of calcium sources.

For years, doctors have recommended that women take supplements of calcium plus vitamin D to help maintain bone density and reduce the risk for fractures. However, a 2006 New England Journal of Medicine study raised some questions about this approach. In the Women’s Health Initiative study, women were randomly assigned to receive either 1,000 mg of calcium carbonate plus 400 IU of vitamin D a day or placebo. The results indicated that daily calcium and vitamin D supplements:

Improve hip bone density slightly (by 1%)
Prevent hip fracture, but only for women who consistently take the supplements. (Another 2006 study supported this finding.)
Do not prevent spine or other types of fractures
Produce a slight increase in the risk of kidney stones

Vitamin D. Vitamin D is necessary for the absorption of calcium in the stomach and gastrointestinal tract and is the essential companion to calcium in maintaining strong bones. Some studies suggest that vitamin D protects against osteoporosis only in combination with calcium.

Vitamin D is manufactured in the skin using energy from the ultraviolet rays in sunlight. It can also be obtained from dietary supplements. As a person ages, vitamin D levels decline. Levels also fall during winter months and when people have inadequate sunlight. Pollution may also contribute to less sunlight and declining vitamin D levels.

Click the icon to see an image of vitamin D sources.

Daily dosage guidelines vary. General recommendations include:

400 IU for people age 50 - 60
600 IU for those over age 70 who do not have sufficient exposure to sunlight. (Some evidence suggests that higher doses of vitamin D -- up to 800 IU per day -- may help prevent fractures in people with osteoporosis.)
800 – 1,000 IU for adults over age 50 (the amount recommended by the National Osteoporosis Foundation)

Drinking milk fortified with vitamin D and sunlight exposure supply most people's need for vitamin D. (One cup of whole milk provides about 100 IU of vitamin D.) Oily fish (sardines especially, as well as salmon, fresh tuna, and mackerel) are also important dietary sources of vitamin D. Wild salmon has a much higher vitamin D content than farmed salmon.

Effect on the Heart. One drink a day in women who are not at risk for alcohol abuse may be beneficial for the heart. Red wine in particular contains a substance called resveratrol, which is classified as a phytoestrogen and has estrogen-like effects.

Effect on Bones. Alcohol has different effects on bones depending on how much is consumed. A 2004 study found that moderate wine consumption was linked to improved bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Alcohol, in moderate amounts, may increase estrogen levels. Excessive drinking, however, has been associated with brittle bones.

Effect on Breast Cancer. Women who drink face an increased risk for breast cancer, but the risk associated with mild-to-moderate drinking is small.

Many women need to increase physical activity and reduce caloric intake before and after menopause. Weight gain is common during these years, and it can be sudden and distressing, particularly when habitual exercise and eating patterns are no longer effective in controlling weight. Gaining weight around the abdomen (the so-called apple shape) is a specific risk factor for heart disease and diabetes and many other health problems. A 2007 study suggested that calcium and vitamin D supplements may help prevent weight gain in postmenopausal women. The benefit was greatest for women who had not been getting enough daily calcium in their diets.

Click the icon to see an image of different types of weight gain.

For protection against all aging diseases, women, whether or not they are taking hormone replacement therapy, should pursue a lifestyle that includes a balanced aerobic and weight resistance exercise program appropriate to their age and medical conditions. Brisk walking, stair climbing, hiking, dancing, and tai chi are all helpful. Several studies report that exercise can help control hot flashes. A healthy diet plus regular, consistent exercise can also help ward off the weight gain associated with menopause. Weight-bearing exercises are specifically helpful for protecting against bone loss. Women should strive for at least 30 minutes of exercise each day (for weight loss, 60 – 90 minutes is preferred). While more exercise is better, any exercise is helpful. A 2007 study showed that postmenopausal sedentary women who exercised only 75 minutes a week experienced improvement in fitness levels.

If a woman smokes, she should quit. Smoking is linked to a decline in estrogen levels. Women who smoke experience menopause about 2 years earlier than nonsmokers. Smoking doubles a woman’s odds of developing coronary heart disease and is a major risk factor for osteoporosis.

Aspirin. The American Heart Association recommends daily low-dose aspirin for all women age 65 years and older who can safely take aspirin. High-risk women may require 75 – 325 mg per day; lower-risk women may benefit from 81 mg a day or 100 mg every other day.

There are many unproven methods for relieving menopausal symptoms, some more effective than others. Acupuncture, meditation, and relaxation techniques are all harmless ways to reduce the stress of menopause, and some people report great benefit from these practices.

Acupuncture, hypnosis, and biofeedback are all alternative ways to control pain. Acupuncture involves the insertion of tiny sterile needles, slightly thicker than a human hair, at specific points on the body.

Women often try herbal or so-called natural remedies to treat menopausal symptoms. There have been numerous studies conducted on various herbal products and other complementary and alterative therapies. These studies have not found that these approaches have any benefit. Some can have adverse side effects.

Many studies have researched plant estrogens (phytoestrogens), which are generally categorized as isoflavones (found in soy and red clover) and lignans (found in whole wheat and flaxseed). No evidence to date indicates that phytoestrogen supplements provide any benefit for hot flashes or other menopausal symptoms. Nevertheless, foods containing them may be healthful.

Supplements containing specific isoflavones found in soy -- typically the estrogen-like compounds genistein and daidzein -- do not appear to provide any benefits compared to the whole soy protein. Taking them separately may, in fact, cause harm, including a possible increase in estrogen-related cancers.

The following herbs are sometimes use for menopausal symptoms and carry certain risks:

Black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa), also known as squaw root, is the herbal remedy most studied for menopausal symptoms. Although it contains a plant estrogen, this substance does not act like an estrogen in the human body. Studies have shown mixed results in preventing hot flashes. A rigorous 2006 study found that black cohosh worked no better than placebo for treating hot flashes and night sweats. While it may be ineffective, black cohosh appears to be safe. Headaches and gastrointestinal problems are common side effects.
Dong quai (Angelica sinensis) does not appear helpful for hot flashes or other menopausal symptoms. Do not use dong quai with blood-thinning drugs, such as warfarin, because it may cause bleeding complications.
Ginseng (Panax ginseng) may help menopausal symptoms of depression and sleep problems, but it has no effect on hot flashes.
Kava (Piper methysticum) may relieve anxiety but it does not help hot flashes. This herb is generally considered unsafe, due to several reports of liver failure and death, especially in people with liver disease.
Wild yam (Dioscorea villosa) is an herb sometimes used for menstrual problems as well as menopausal symptoms. It contains a plant progesterone. However, like black cohosh, there is no evidence that the human body can convert this substance into a hormone. Patients should be aware that some commercial herbal wild yam products contain prescription progesterones.
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is a weak male hormone secreted by the adrenal gland. It is available as a dietary supplement. DHEA has no benefit for hot flashes and may increase the risk of breast cancer.

Generally, manufacturers of herbal remedies and dietary supplements do not need FDA approval to sell their products. Just like with drugs, herbs and supplements can affect the body's chemistry, and therefore have the potential to produce side effects that may be harmful. There have been a number of reported cases of serious and even lethal side effects from herbal products. Patients should check with their doctors before using any herbal remedies or dietary supplements.

Medications

Doctors used to believe that HRT could help reduce the risk of heart disease and other health risks in addition to treating menopausal symptoms. The results of an important study, called the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), led doctors to revise their recommendations regarding HRT.

The WHI, started in 1991, enrolled 161,809 women between the ages of 50 - 79 in 40 different medical centers. Part of the study was intended to examine the health benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy, including the risks of breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots.

In 2002, one component of the WHI, which studied the use of estrogen and progestin in women who had a uterus, was stopped early because the health risks exceeded the health benefits. The main reason for stopping the estrogen-progestin study was a 26% increase in breast cancer. This combination therapy study also showed an increased risk for heart attack, stroke, blood clots, and dementia. There was a reduced risk for colorectal cancer and bone fractures, but these benefits did not outweigh the considerable risks.

In 2004, a second component of the WHI, which studied estrogen-only therapy in women who no longer have a uterus, was stopped early. This was primarily because of an increase in the risk for strokes and blood clots. The study also found the estrogen-only therapy had no effect on heart attack or colorectal cancer risk. An update in 2006 suggested that estrogen-only therapy does not increase breast cancer risk over the short term (average 7 years) but may increase risk when taken for a longer time (15 years or more). Another WHI update, from 2007, indicated that estrogen-only therapy can help reduce calcium deposits in the coronary arteries (a sign of heart disease) for women in their 50s who have had a hysterectomy. However, women who have a uterus cannot take estrogen-only HRT because it increases the risk for uterine cancer. Combination estrogen-progestin HRT does not have the same benefits for cholesterol reduction as estrogen-only HRT.

While the WHI studies indicate that HRT should not be prescribed for prevention of chronic diseases, many doctors still accept its use for short-term treatment of moderate-to-severe hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms, and in women undergoing premature menopause for medical or other reasons. Current guidelines recommend using the lowest possible dose for the shortest duration of time. A 2007 position statement from the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) supports short-term use of HRT for treatment of hot flashes and other vasomotor symptoms in recently menopausal women who have a low risk for stroke. However, NAMS recommends that women who are at risk for heart disease or breast cancer should avoid hormone therapy and try other options to manage symptoms.

When a woman stops taking HRT, perimenopausal symptoms may recur. There is some debate about whether it is better to abruptly stop the medication or to taper it off gradually. A 2006 study suggested that gradual discontinuation of HRT delays -- but does not prevent -- the reappearance of symptoms. However, when a woman reaches full menopause, symptoms will eventually go away.

Hormones Used in HRT. Hormone replacement therapy uses either estrogen alone (known as ET or unopposed estrogen) or in combination with forms of progesterone (known as combined hormone therapy or EPT). Progesterone is referred to by one of several names:

Progesterone is the name for the natural hormone.
Progestin is the term for any hormone, natural or synthetic, that causes progesterone effects.
Progestogen is any hormone that has effects similar to progesterone.

Both ET and EPT are available in many forms, including oral tablets, skin patches, and vaginal and skin applications. A new form approved by the FDA in 2004 is a topical estrogen gel that is applied to the arm.

HRT is mainly recommended for relieving menopausal symptoms, including hot flashes, night sweats, vaginal dryness, sleep problems, and mild depression. HRT does not prevent certain other problems associated with menopausal changes, such as thinning hair.

Oral hormonal medications and skin patches are equally effective in reducing hot flashes, mild depression, and sleep problems. Progestins may sometimes be prescribed alone for hot flashes and other acute menopausal symptoms, though they can cause side effects, such as mood swings, bloating, and breast tenderness. Estrogen creams, rings, or vaginal tablets restore vaginal elasticity and lubrication and improve sexual pleasure.

HRT may be useful for some women at high risk for osteoporosis, although other drugs, such as bisphosphonates, should be considered first. It increases bone density and also appears to improve balance and protects against falling. Studies also report reductions in fractures (especially hip fractures) among women taking HRT, but the benefits may not outweigh the risks of HRT. It appears that the beneficial effects wear off soon after therapy is stopped. Estrogen must be taken life long for maximum protection against osteoporosis, which then increases the risk for adverse health effects.

Heart Disease. HRT does not prevent heart disease and can increase the risk for heart disease and heart attack, especially in older women. An important 2007 Women’s Health Initiative study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that this risk is time and age dependent. The study found that women who began HRT within 10 years of menopause had less risk of heart disease than women who begin HRT later on. This study suggests that HRT may be safest for women younger than age 60, and should be avoided by women older than age 60. Any woman who is considering HRT should be sure to have her blood pressure and cholesterol levels evaluated.

Another 2007 study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), also indicated that timing is important. The NEJM study found that that estrogen-only HRT may help reduce calcium deposits in coronary arteries in younger women (age 50 - 59) who have had a hysterectomy. (Because of the increased risk for uterine cancer, estrogen-only HRT is only appropriate for women who no longer have a uterus. Women who have a uterus need to take estrogen-progestin HRT. And, estrogen can increase the risk for heart attack in women who have advanced heart disease.) Although the NEJM study found some heart benefits for estrogen-only HRT for younger women, experts still advise that HRT should be used for only a few years. Any woman who is considering HRT should be sure to have her blood pressure and cholesterol levels evaluated.

Stroke. HRT increases the risk of stroke, regardless of years since menopause. In addition, HRT appears to worsen the outlook for women who have had a stroke.

Mental Decline. Observational studies had suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) helped prevent mental decline and even Alzheimer's disease after menopause. Other studies have found no differences in mental performance and no protection from Alzheimer's disease in women taking HRT compared to non-users. A 2004 review of the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study found that combined HRT did not reduce the risk of cognitive impairment, and actually increased the risk of dementia among women ages 65 and over.

Thromboembolism. HRT is associated with a higher risk for thromboembolism, in which blood clots form in deep veins. This places women at risk for pulmonary embolism, in which the blood clot travels to the lungs.

Click the icon to see an image of a pulmonary embolism.

Breast Cancer. Because breast tissue growth is highly sensitive to estrogens, the more a woman is exposed to estrogen over her lifetime, the higher the risk for breast cancer. A number of studies have reported a higher risk for breast cancer in postmenopausal women taking HRT that contains both estrogen and progestin. A combination of estrogen and testosterone also increases breast cancer risk. A 2005 study suggested that HRT with no or low progestin is safer than standard estrogen-progestin combination therapy.

Several 2006 studies of women who had a hysterectomy indicated that estrogen alone does not increase overall breast cancer risk when the drug is used for 7 years or less. However, women who take the drug for 15 years or more do have an increased risk. Women who are at low risk for breast cancer tend to have fewer breast cancers with estrogen alone, while women at higher risk tend to have more breast cancers. In addition, estrogen therapy may cause abnormal mammogram results. Breast tissue density increases with HRT, which makes mammograms more difficult to read and leads to more breast biopsies. Women who take estrogen HRT should be aware that they need frequent mammogram screenings.

As further evidence of the association between HRT and breast cancer, a 2007 New England Journal of Medicine study noted that breast cancer rates have fallen as HRT use has declined.

Endometrial (Uterine) Cancers. Estrogen overstimulates the tissue lining the uterus (the endometrium) and causes uncontrolled cell growth, a condition known as hyperplasia, which is a strong risk factor for cancer. Taking unopposed estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) increases the risk of endometrial cancer at least five-fold. Adding progestin to HRT appears to pose no risk for this cancer. However, a 2007 study indicated that short-term treatment (3 years) with ERT is associated with a relatively low risk of endometrial cancer. Women who take ERT should anticipate uterine bleeding, especially if they are obese, and may need endometrial biopsies and other gynecologic tests.

Ovarian Cancer. HRT appears to increase the risk for ovarian cancer. A 2007 UK study of nearly 1 million women found that women who used HRT for more than 5 years were 20% more likely to develop and die from ovarian cancer than women who had never taken HRT.

Gallstones. HRT is associated with a higher risk for gallstones.

Despite its risks, hormone replacement therapy appears to be the best treatment for hot flashes. Nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms include:

Antidepressants. The antidepressants known as selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are sometimes used for managing mood changes and hot flashes. They include fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), venlafaxine (Effexor), and paroxetine (Paxil, Asimia). A 2006 review of nonhormonal therapies, found that paroxetine in particular may help hot flashes. However, paroxetine, like other antidepressants, can cause headache, anxiety, and sexual problems. A 2007 study suggested that the antidepressant citalopram (Celexa), given alone or with HRT, may help treat hot flashes.

An investigational antidepressant, desvenlafaxine (Pristiq), is also being studied for treatment of hot flashes, night sweats, and perimenopausal sleep problems. Research presented at the 2007 meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists indicated that desvenlaxafine, which is related to venlaxafine, showed promise in improving symptoms.

Gabapentin.Several small studies suggest that gabapentin (Neurontin), a drug used for seizures and nerve pain, may relieve hot flashes. Gabapentin may cause drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue, and swelling of the hands and feet.

Clonidine. Clonidine (Catapres) is a drug used to treat high blood pressure. Studies show it may help manage hot flashes. Side effects include dizziness, drowsiness, dry mouth, and constipation

Testosterone. Some doctors prescribe combinations of estrogen and small amounts of the male hormone testosterone to improve sexual function and increase bone density. Side effects of testosterone include increased body hair, acne, fluid retention, anxiety, and depression. Testosterone also adversely affects cholesterol and lipid levels. A 2006 study indicated that combined estrogen and testosterone can increase the risk of breast cancer.


HRT Form	Brand Name	Active Ingredient	Side Effects
Oral Estrogens	Premarin	Natural conjugated estrogen, which is a mixture of estrogens derived from the urine of pregnant mares	Bleeding after withdrawal. It is a primary reason why many women stop treatment, although usually lighter or shorter compared to before menopause. If it is distressing, patient should consider continuous estrogen and progestin therapy. Irregular bleeding. This should be checked with the doctor for possible problems. Nausea and vomiting. If it occurs, usually does so only during the first 3 months and is minimal. Rarely with low doses. Headaches. Cramps. Risk for blood clots.
	Cenestin	Synthetic conjugated estrogen, which is a mixture of estrogens derived from compounds found in yams and soy
	Estratab, Menest	Plant-derived estrogens, called esterified estrogens. Usually made from modified soy
	Estrace (oral)	Estradiol, the most potent natural estrogen
	Ogen, Ortho-Est	Estropipate, a version of estrone, which is a weaker form of estrogen
	Estrovis	Quinetrol, a synthetic estrogen
	Estinyl	Synthetic form estradiol, the most potent estrogen

Oral Progestins	Provera, Amen, Curretab, Cycrin	Medroxyprogesterone, a synthetic progestin	Breast tenderness. Usually subsides in 3 - 4 months and can be relieved with over-the-counter painkillers and possibly by decreasing caffeine intake and adding vitamin E. Headache. Fluid build-up. Bloating. Fatigue, unusual tiredness, weakness. Depression, irritability, or other mood changes.
	Norlutin, Aygestin, Norlutate	Norethindrone and norethindrone acetate, synthetic progestins
		Norgestrel

Oral Combinations of Estrogen and Progestin	Prempro, Premphase	Conjugated estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone	May have some of the side effects of both estrogen and progestin. Continuous regimens eliminate menstrual bleeding in more than half of women. Investigators are studying the use of higher progestin doses or a lower estrogen doses and comparing combinations for further reduction of bleeding risk.
	Activelle, Femhrt	Estradiol and norethindrone or norethindrone acetate
	Ortho-Prefest	Estradiol and norgestimate
	Angeliq	Estradiol and drospirenone

Skin Patch Administration of HRT	Estraderm, Alora, Climara, Vivelle, FemPatch, Evorel	Estradiol	Skin irritation where the patch is applied most common. Hormonal side effects associated with formulation of patch.
Skin Patch Administration of HRT	CombiPath	Estradiol plus norethindrone (a progestin)

Vaginal Creams for dryness and irritation	Estrace (cream)	Estradiol (potent estrogen)	Hormonal side effects associated with estrogen or progestins, depending on formulation.
	Ogen (cream)	Estropipate (weaker estrogen.)
	Premarin (cream)	Conjugated natural estrogens
	Ortho-dienestrol (cream)	Dienestrol (synthetic estrogen)
	Crinone (cream)	A natural progesterone
Other forms of vaginal administration	Vagifem (vaginal tablet)
	Estring (vagina Ring)	Estradiol
	Other forms: injections, nasal sprays, and as pellets inserted under the skin twice a year.
Topical Gel	EstroGel	Estradiol	Hormonal side effects associated with estrogen.

Resources

www.menopause.org -- North American Menopause Society
www.acog.com -- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
www.nia.nih.gov -- National Institute on Aging
www.nhlbi.nih.gov/whi/recommend.htm -- Women's Health Initiative Study
www.nih.gov/PHTindex.htm -- National Institutes of Health -- Menopausal Hormone Therapy Information
http://nccam.nih.gov/health/menopauseandcam -- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

References

Beral V; Million Women Study Collaborators; Bull D, Green J, Reeves G. Ovarian cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet. 2007 May 19;369(9574):1703-10.

Caan B, Neuhouser M, Aragaki A, Lewis CB, Jackson R, Leboff MS, et al. Calcium plus vitamin d supplementation and the risk of postmenopausal weight gain. Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):893-902.

Church TS, Earnest CP, Skinner JS, Blair SN. Effects of different doses of physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness among sedentary, overweight or obese postmenopausal women with elevated blood pressure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 May 16;297(19):2081-91.

Haimov-Kochman R, Barak-Glantz E, Arbel R, Leefsma M, Brzezinski A, Milwidsky A, et al. Gradual discontinuation of hormone therapy does not prevent the reappearance of climacteric symptoms: a randomized prospective study. Menopause. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):370-6.

Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, Wallace RB, Robbins J, Lewis CE, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):669-83.

Kalay AE, Demir B, Haberal A, Kalay M, Kandemir O. Efficacy of citalopram on climacteric symptoms. Menopause. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):223-9.

Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, Carr JJ, Langer RD, Hsia J, et al. Estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcification. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 21;356(25):2591-602.

Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bushnell C, Dolor RJ, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 update. Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1481-501.

Nedrow A, Miller J, Walker M, Nygren P, Huffman LH, Nelson HD. Complementary and alternative therapies for the management of menopause-related symptoms: a systematic evidence review. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 24;166(14):1453-65.

Newton KM, Reed SD, LaCroix AZ, Grothaus LC, Ehrlich K, Guiltinan J. Treatment of vasomotor symptoms of menopause with black cohosh, multibotanicals, soy, hormone therapy, or placebo: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 19;145(12):869-79.

North American Menopause Society. Estrogen and progestogen use in peri- and postmenopausal women: March 2007 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):168-82.

North American Menopause Society. The role of local vaginal estrogen for treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: 2007 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2007 May-Jun;14(3 Pt 1):355-69.

Ohayon MM. Severe hot flashes are associated with chronic insomnia. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jun 26;166(12):1262-8.

Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, Berg CD, Chlebowski RT, Feuer EJ, et al. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 19;356(16):1670-4.

Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Manson JE, Wu L, Barad D, Barnabei VM, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease by age and years since menopause. JAMA. 2007 Apr 4;297(13):1465-77.

Steiner AZ, Xiang M, Mack WJ, Shoupe D, Felix JC, Lobo RA, et al. Unopposed estradiol therapy in postmenopausal women: results from two randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):581-7.

Tamimi RM, Hankinson SE, Chen WY, Rosner B, Colditz GA. Combined estrogen and testosterone use and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 24;166(14):1483-9.

Review Date:
6/25/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com