FitSugar

Cooking Oil Breakdown

FitSugar — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:30:00 -0700

Being a curious creature, I like to compare things. Recently, I decided to focus on cooking oil. I tend to use canola and olive oil when cooking since they're healthy oils, but as I peruse the shelves of oils at the grocery store, there are so many more to choose from. For easy comparison, I created this breakdown. The oils are fairly similar calorie-wise, but take a look at the saturated fat content. This is the fat you want to limit in your diet, so that's why coconut and palm kernel oil should be used or eaten sparingly. Since some of you may prefer to cook or bake with butter or margarine, I included those at the bottom of the list, just for comparison. I also included oils that you wouldn't necessarily cook with, but that you may find in a list of ingredients on pre-packaged foods.

To see the breakdown, read more.

Here's the nutritional info for one tablespoon of oil.

Oil	Calories	Total (g)	Saturated Fat (g)
Almond oil	120	14	1
Avocado oil	124	14	1.6
Canola oil	120	14	1
Coconut oil	117	13.6	11.8
Corn oil	120	14	2
Cottonseed oil	119	14	3
Extra virgin olive oil	120	14	2
Flaxseed oil	120	13.6	1.3
Grapeseed oil	120	13.6	1.3
Hemp seed oil	126	14	1.5
Macadamia nut oil	120	14	2
Olive oil	119	13.5	1.9
Palm oil	120	13.6	6.7
Palm kernel oil	116	14	11
Peanut oil	119	13.5	2.3
Safflower oil	120	13.6	.8
Sesame oil	120	13.6	1.9
Soybean oil	120	13.6	2
Sunflower oil	120	13.6	1.8
Vegetable oil	124	14	.9
Walnut oil	120	14	1.5
Wheatgerm oil	120	13.6	2.6
Butter	102	11.5	7.3
Smart Balance Margarine	80	9	2.5

Source

Cooked Leafy Green Breakdown

FitSugar — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:00:31 -0700

In the Summer months, I crave cool, crispy raw salad greens, but when cooler temps roll in, I'm all about cooked greens. I often sauté them in a little olive oil with garlic, and they're flavorful, low in calories, and full of vitamins and nutrients. If you've ever wondered just how nutritious they are, I made a little chart so you can find out.

To see the breakdown, read more.

1 cup cooked	Calories	Fiber (g)	Vitamin A (IU)	Iron (mg)	Potassium (mg)	Folate (mcg)
Your RDI (just to compare)	around 2,000	25-30	2,333	18	4,200	400
Spinach	41	4	18,867	6.4	839	263
Mustard spinach	29	4	14,761	1.4	513	131
Kale	36	3	17,709	1.2	296	16.9
Swiss chard	35	4	10,717	4	961	15.7
Broccoli raab (1 bunch cooked)	144	12	19,812	5.5	1,499	310
Escarole	95	5.8	1,843	1.4	530	172
Mustard greens	22.4	3	2,100	1.08	301	108
Turnip greens	33	5.7	4,199	1.3	333	196
Watercress	15	2	2,823	.36	449	8

Not sure how to use cooked greens? Try indian spiced chard or simple sautéed escarole, and this is how I like to prepare kale. If you have a tasty way to cook greens, please share it in the Healthy Recipe group.

Source: Flickr User PetroleumJelliffe

Fights the Blues With Fish

FitSugar — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:00:00 -0700

When thinking of food as medicine, we have gotten a little reductive. By trying to find the one active ingredient that makes a food healthy, we have forgotten about the food itself. Omega-3 fatty acids found in fish have been found to fight inflammation and reduce depression. But popping a fish oil supplement, rather than eating the fish, means you are missing out on the minerals and lean protein fish provide.

Here's another reason to add one to two servings of fish to your weekly menu. In an international breakdown of nutrition and mental health by country, researchers found that as fish consumption went up, depression rates went down. In countries where people eat the most fish - Japan, Thailand, and Hong Kong - the rates of depression were low. Conversely, countries with low fish consumption had higher rates of depression, including the US, New Zealand, and parts of Europe.The secret ingredient is the omega-3s. Rather than taking a supplement, try eating the fish for all the nutrition this lean protein can provide.

Not sure where to start when it comes to cooking with fish? For some tasty, healthy recipes featuring fish and shellfish with high amounts of omega-3s, read more.

What Is the Deal With: Grapeseed Oil

FitSugar — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:45:00 -0800

I recently bought some grapeseed oil for a new "longevity" recipe I am about to try (if it is any good I will be sure to share it with you). Unpacking my groceries, I was feeling like I got suckered into buying yet another cooking oil that is supposed to help me age gracefully. So I did some research and it looks like I am not such a sucker after all.

Made from the seeds of grapes left over from the wine-making process, one tablespoon contains only one gram of saturated fat to olive oil's two grams. It is also high in polyunsaturated fats, which have been found to lower the bad cholesterol. The brag sheet doesn't stop there. Grapeseed oil has been found to raise HDL cholesterol (that's the good kind), which is rare for polyunsaturated fats. Grapeseed oil is very high in vitamin E and other antioxidants, similar to ones found in grapes and wine. Not only that, it is high in linoleic acid (omega-6 fatty acids).

To how this healthy oil cooks up, just read more.

Cooking wise, grapeseed oil has a higher smoke point than olive oil making it ideal for sautés; smoke point is where an oil burn starts to breakdown. It's also a very mild nutty taste so the flavor of the food you are cooking really shines. Grapeseed oil also has great emulsifiying properties (keeping everything mixed together) making it an excellent oil for salad dressings.

It can be difficult to find expeller-pressed (meaning harsh solvents and chemicals are not used to extract the oil from the seed) grapeseed oil, and that is why I like the brand La Tourangelle because it's is expeller-pressed. You can find it online at La Tourangelle or find a store in your area that carries it.

Happy cooking!

Source

Non-small cell lung cancer

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:06 -0700

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Research News:

About 3,000 nonsmokers die each year of lung cancer resulting from exposure to secondhand smoke, according to a 2006 Surgeon General report.
Advexin, a genetic therapy that contains the p53 tumor-suppressor gene, is showing promise. A 2006 study in Japan found that out of 13 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving Advexin, 10 had stabilized. Advexin is in Phase II clinical trials for NSCLC.
Studies are finding that NSCLC tumors in people who never smoked have a much higher rate of epithelial growth-factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. EGFR helps new blood vessels grow to feed tumors. This discovery may help tailor future treatments to specific patient populations. It also helps explain why some newer treatments seem effective mostly in patients who never smoked.

Treatment News:

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is a new, less-invasive surgical technique that uses a thin tube containing a miniature camera and surgical instruments. Though the procedure is not appropriate in all cases, it offers significant advantages, especially in older or frail patients, in the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody, was approved in October 2006 as a first-line treatment (in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel) for inoperable, locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer.
Gefitinib (Iressa), a drug that targets EGFR, proved disappointing in final clinical trials. However, erlotinib (Tarceva), a drug that targets a different part of the EGFR molecule, has shown benefits. Erlotinib is now approved as a second-line chemotherapy to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after a previous course of chemotherapy failed.

Introduction

Although lung cancer accounts for only 13% of all cancers, it is among the most lethal, accounting for over 28% of all cancer deaths. It is more deadly than colon, breast, and prostate cancers combined. An estimated 160,390 people will die from lung cancer in 2007. Death rates have been declining in men over the past decade, and they have now stabilized in women.

The lungs are two spongy organs surrounded by a thin moist membrane called the pleura. Each lung is composed of smooth, shiny lobes: the right lung has three lobes, and the left has two. About 90% of the lung is filled with air; only 10% is solid tissue.

Air is carried from the trachea (the windpipe) into the lung through flexible airways called bronchi.
Like the branches of a tree, the bronchi in turn divide into over a million smaller airways called bronchioles.
The bronchioles lead to grape-like clusters of microscopic sacs called alveoli.
In each adult lung, there are about 300 million of these tiny alveoli. A thin membrane makes up the alveoli sacs. Oxygen and carbon dioxide pass through this membrane to and from capillaries.
Capillaries, the smallest of our blood vessels, carry blood throughout the body.

The major features of the lungs include the bronchi, the bronchioles, and the alveoli. The alveoli are the microscopic blood vessel-lined sacks in which oxygen and carbon dioxide gas are exchanged.

Lung cancer develops when genetic mutations (changes) occur in a normal cell within the lung. As a result, the cell becomes abnormal in shape and behavior, and reproduces endlessly. The abnormal cells form a tumor that, if not surgically removed, invades neighboring blood vessels and lymph nodes and spreads to nearby sites. Eventually, the cancer can spread (metastasize) to locations throughout the body.

The two major categories of lung cancer are small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Most lung cancers are non-small cell cancer, the subject of this report. Less common cancers of the lung are known as carcinoids, cylindromas, and certain sarcomas (cancer in soft tissues).

Some experts believe all primary lung cancers come from a single common malignant (cancerous) stem cell that, as it copies itself, can develop into any one of these cancer types in different individuals.

In addition, cancers in the lung may have spread from other primary sites, such as the breast, thyroid, or colon. In these cases, doctors name the cancer after its original location; for example, "breast cancer with lung metastases."

Non-small cell lung cancers are categorized into three types: squamous cell carcinoma (also called epidermoid carcinoma), adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. These separate types are grouped together because, in early stages before the cancers have spread, they all can be treated surgically.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Squamous cells are formed from reserve cells, which are round cells that replace injured or damaged cells in the lining (the epithelium) of the bronchi, the major airways. Tumors formed from squamous cells are usually found in the center of the lung, either in a major lobe or in one of the main airway branches. They may grow to large sizes and form cavities in the lungs.

Click the icon to see an image of squamous cell carcinoma.

When squamous cell cancer metastasizes, it may travel to the bone, adrenal glands, liver, small intestine, and brain.

Squamous cell carcinoma is nearly always caused by smoking and used to be the most common cancer. It still makes up 25 - 40% of all lung cancers.

Adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinomas usually arise from the mucus-producing cells in the lung. About two-thirds of adenocarcinomas develop in the outer regions of the lung, while one-third develop in the center of the lung. In 1965, 12% of lung cancers were adenocarcinomas. They are now estimated to account for 30 - 50% of all lung cancers and are the most common lung cancers in many countries. They are also the most common lung cancers in women. In fact, a 2000 European study showed that nearly 34% of the women with lung cancer under investigation had adenocarcinoma, compared to 26.4% who had squamous cell carcinoma, and 22.3% with small cell lung cancer. Adenocarcinoma is also increasing dramatically in men. Until recently, adenocarcinoma was only weakly linked to smoking. Experts now suggest, however, that the dramatic increase in recent decades in this lung cancer type may be due to low-tar, filtered cigarettes. People who smoke them draw tiny particles deeper into the lungs, thereby possibly increasing the risk for adenocarcinoma.

The course of this cancer varies widely. Most often, it develops slowly and causes few or no symptoms until it is far advanced. In some cases, however, it can be extremely aggressive and rapidly fatal. In 50% of cases in which this cancer spreads, it spreads only to the brain. Other common locations it spreads to include the other lung, the liver, the adrenal glands, and bone.

Click the icon to see an image of adenocarcinoma.

Bronchoalveolar Lung Cancer. Bronchoalveolar lung cancer is actually a subtype of adenocarcinoma. It develops as a layer of column-like cells on the lung and spreads through the airways, causing great volumes of sputum. This cancer also is increasing in incidence.

Large Cell Carcinoma. Large cell carcinoma, which makes up about 10 - 20% of lung cancers, includes cancers that cannot be identified under the microscope as squamous cell cancers or adenocarcinomas.

Click the icon to see an image of large cell carcinoma.

Small cell lung cancer may, like squamous cells, be derived from reserve cells or other cells in the epithelium. It causes 15 - 25% of all lung cancers; without chemotherapy, it is very aggressive and usually rapidly fatal. It requires a different treatment approach from non-small cell lung cancer, so it is not discussed in this report.

Click the icon to see an image of small cell carcinoma.

Causes

Cigarette Smoke. Smoking causes 87% of lung cancer deaths, accounting for 30% of all cancer deaths. Cigarettes, nicotine, or both may contribute to lung cancer in one or more of the following ways:

In general, chronic exposure to nicotine may cause an acceleration of coronary artery disease, peptic ulcer disease, reproductive disturbances, esophageal reflux, hypertension, fetal illnesses and death, and delayed wound healing.

The smoke is the most dangerous component of the cigarette. Chemicals formed during smoking trigger genetic mutations that lead to cancer. When people inhale cigarette smoke, they bring into their lungs tar that includes over 4,000 chemicals, some of which are carcinogenic (cancer-causing). Other inhaled chemicals in cigarette smoke that may increase the risk for cancer include cyanide, benzene, formaldehyde, methanol (wood alcohol), acetylene (the fuel used in torches), and ammonia. Smoke also contains nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide, both of which are harmful gases.
Nicotine itself may be a hazard. A 2000 laboratory study suggested that the human body might be converting inhaled nicotine into a chemical called aminoketone, which has been linked to the formation of tobacco-related lung cancer. A 2001 study reported that nicotine triggered new blood vessel growth, which could, in theory, promote growth of any existing tumors. A study published in 2005 found that nicotine was responsible for disabling a gene that induces the death of cancer cells in lung tumors. Whether or not these studies apply to long-term use of nicotine replacement products (such as patches), or to cigarette smoking, is still unclear. The studies should certainly not discourage people from using nicotine replacement methods for quitting. However, these studies may indicate that people should not use these devices on a long-term basis.

Radon. Radon is a gas produced naturally by the breakdown of uranium. It is often present in the soil and in water and can seep into any dwelling. Radon may be responsible for between 10% and 14% of lung cancer deaths, making it, after smoking, the second leading cause of this cancer.

Other Contributors. Toxic particles leading to precancerous changes in the lung are also found in marijuana. In one study, 53.8% of cigarette smokers, 66.7% of marijuana smokers, and all of those subjects who smoked both substances showed evidence of precancerous changes in the lungs.

There is considerable debate over the lung cancer risk posed by depleted uranium used in military weapons (such as in the Gulf and Balkan conflicts). A 2001 study estimated that it would cause an additional 8 deaths from lung cancer out of every 10,000 people or soldiers who were highly exposed to this substance. The study was based on a mathematical model, however, and the issue is not settled.

Other lung carcinogens include asbestos, arsenic, certain petrochemicals (materials made from crude oil or natural gas), and other airborne (carried through the air) byproducts of various mining and manufacturing processes.

Click the icon to see an image of the tobacco plant.

Genetic mutations that cause cancer generally occur in two types of genes:

Tumor-suppressor genes, which prevent cells from endlessly copying themselves
Proto-oncogenes, which encourage cells to keep making copies of themselves [when a proto-oncogene changes (becomes mutated), it is then called an oncogene]

Damage to either type of gene can cause a mutation that results in an uncontrolled division of cells. This uncontrolled division forms tumors.

It is unlikely that a single specific abnormality causes all lung cancer. It probably takes a variety of mutations to start the devastating chain of events leading to cancer. The following mutations are among those under investigation:

BPDE-caused mutations: The chemical BPDE, a byproduct of tobacco smoke, is involved with a number of genetic mutations, including those to an oncogene called K-ras and to three tumor-suppressor genes known as p53, PPP2R1B, and p16. When normal, the tumor-suppressor genes are involved in cell repair and healthy copying of the cell. When they are damaged or blocked, out of control cell production can occur, leading to cancer. About 10% of the population may carry a gene that protects against lung cancer, by reducing levels of BPDE.
Chemotherapy resistance genes: Tumors that contain the p53 mutation may also be more resistant to chemotherapy.
Rb Mutations: Another important contributor to lung cancer is a genetically defective protein called retinoblastoma (Rb), which is associated with very aggressive tumors. Low levels of the normal Rb gene may sometimes predict aggressive cancer, especially in patients with small cell lung cancer.
Mutations to the FHIT gene: Another potentially important mutation may be an abnormality in the FHIT gene. This mutation causes the cells lining the lung to become more vulnerable to the effects of tobacco smoke and other carcinogens.

Symptoms

Lung cancer is unlikely to produce symptoms until the disease is advanced. When symptoms develop, they may result from the lung tumor itself, from its effects on tissues outside the lung, or from the spread of malignant cells to other organs.

Early symptoms may include the following:

Frequent bouts of pneumonia, or pneumonia that does not clear up in a normal period of time
Coughing (particularly coughing up blood)
Weight loss
Fever
Shortness of breath
Chest pain

Later-stage symptoms include the following:

Shortness of breath: This common symptom is the result of cancer that has spread in the lung and the pleura, the membrane covering the lung.
Superior vena cava syndrome: In some cases, tumor growth or spreading of the cancer presses against the superior vena cava, a large vein that returns blood from the upper part of the body to the heart. When this happens, a condition called superior vena cava syndrome may occur, leading to obvious swelling in the arms and face.
Trouble swallowing: The esophagus is the pipe that takes food from the mouth to the stomach. The cancer may spread to or press against the esophagus, interfering with swallowing and nutrition.
Hoarseness: Cancer can damage the nerves that control the voice box, causing hoarseness.
Pancoast syndrome: Damage to the brachial plexus, a group of nerves branching from the neck, can cause pain, weakness, or numbness in the arm or hand (Pancoast syndrome).
Bronchoalveolar lung cancer may produce very large amounts of mucus.
Hypercalcemia: Some lung cancers produce substances that remove calcium from bone and release it into the bloodstream, causing a condition called hypercalcemia. Patients with this disorder can experience nausea, vomiting, constipation, weakness, and fatigue.

Other lung cancers (usually small cell cancer) cause the body to retain water, lowering the blood's sodium levels. This condition, called hyponatremia, can produce confusion, weakness, and even seizures.

Risk Factors

Before cigarettes became popular in the beginning of the 20th century, lung cancer was rare. In 2007, lung cancer is expected to strike up to 213,380 Americans, and about 160,390 are expected to die from it.The disease usually occurs in people over 50 years old. Men have a significantly greater incidence of lung cancer compared to women. On the encouraging side, the rate of lung cancer in men has been declining significantly over the past decade. While lung cancer rates have been increasing dramatically in women (by 600% from 1950 to 2000), they now appear to be stabilizing.

Smoking appears to be the primary risk factor in 85 - 90% of lung cancers. About 15% of all people who smoke develop lung cancer. The risk depends on the duration of the addiction and the number of pack years. (One pack year equals the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day, multiplied by the number of years that the person has smoked.) Genetic damage in the lung occurs in nearly all chronic smokers, even if cancer has not developed.

An elevated risk for lung cancer can persist for more than 20 years after quitting smoking, although the risk drops significantly even in the first year after quitting. And, there are benefits to quitting smoking even for people who are well into middle age.


Quitting Age	Percentage
30	2%
40	3%
50	6%
60	10%

Second-Hand Smoke. The Environmental Protection Agency has classified second-hand smoke as a carcinogen (cancer-causing chemical). Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke increases the risk of lung cancer in the nonsmoker by about 20 - 30%. A 2006 Surgeon General report found that about 3,000 nonsmokers die each year of lung cancer resulting from exposure to secondhand smoke.

There may be some ethnic differences in lung cancer risk. For example, African-Americans face a risk that is two to four times higher than that in Caucasians, regardless of smoking status. It is not clear what factors are responsible for this higher risk. Some African-Americans appear to have a genetic vulnerability to the harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke.

In China, an estimated one third of all young male smokers will eventually die because of tobacco-related illnesses. Their risk for lung cancer, however, is much less than it is for chronic lung disease, the opposite of the Western trend. A 2001 study reported that the lower rate of lung cancer among Chinese people might be due to a slow rate of clearing nicotine, which results in smoking fewer cigarettes.

People with High Exposure to Radon. Studies have shown that radon raises the risk of lung cancer in underground miners by 40%. It is unclear whether the results of these studies would apply to people exposed to radon in their homes One study suggests that people with intense or prolonged exposure to radon in their homes do indeed face the same risk as miners exposed to similar levels of radon. A cumulative long-term exposure to radon and smoking also increases the danger. Most people move an average of 10 or 11 times over their lifetime, so the risk of developing lung cancer through radon exposure is very low in most individuals, even for those who lived for awhile in areas with high radon levels. People with homes that have high radon levels and those who sleep or spend many hours to days in basements with detectable but moderate levels should consider taking protective measures.

Workers Highly Exposed to Carcinogens. An estimated 9,000 - 10,000 men and 900 - 1,900 women develop lung cancer each year because of occupational exposure to carcinogens. More than half of these cases are attributable to past exposure to asbestos, which has long been known to be a risk factor for mesothelioma (cancer of the pleura, the lining around the lung) and can increase the risk of lung cancer in smokers. With better protective measures, these rates are expected to fall in the future.

Other chemicals that put workers at risk for lung cancer include:

Arsenic (insecticide and herbicide sprayers, tanners, oil refinery workers)
Chloromethyl methyl ether (workers exposed to certain polymers, water repellents, or products using chloride and formaldehyde)
Chromium compounds (workers using certain alloys, paints, pigments, and preservatives)
Depleted uranium (soldiers exposed to weapons during battlefield conditions)
Crystalline silica

By contrast, agricultural workers seem to have a lower lung cancer rate, despite their possible occupational exposures to risky chemicals. While this rate has traditionally been attributed to good health habits, including low tobacco use, a 2000 study suggests that agricultural workers' exposure to endotoxin may be responsible. Endotoxin is a component of common bacteria found in soil and animals and may have cancer-preventing effects on the immune system.

Exposure to Smoke from Grills. Grilling and high-heat frying emit chemicals called heterocyclic amines, which are known to be carcinogenic. A 2000 study of Chinese women found that smokers who stir-fried meat daily and inhaled cooking fumes had a higher risk of lung cancer than did those who stir-fried meat less frequently. No higher risk was found among nonsmokers.

Air Pollution. Although any risk from air pollution is very small, it nevertheless may be a contributor to those lung cancers not obviously related to smoking. Some studies, including a major analysis of vital statistics in 2002, have found an association between increased risk for lung cancer and long-term exposure to very small particulates, especially sulfates, present in polluted air. The risk, if any, is very small.

A family history of lung cancer may play a role in increasing susceptibility to this disease. In one study, people who had parents or siblings with respiratory tract cancers had a 30% higher risk for lung cancer, compared to people without a family history. Women with mothers or sisters with lung cancer had triple the risk. A higher risk occurred in both smokers and nonsmokers. There was no association between a history of other cancers and lung cancer. Both genetic factors and secondhand smoke appeared to contribute to the danger in these individuals.

Smokers with emphysema or chronic inflammatory lung diseases, such as asthma, are at increased risk for lung cancer. Both smokers and nonsmokers whose lungs are scarred from recurrent lung diseases, such as pneumonia or tuberculosis, are also at increased risk, particularly for bronchoalveolar lung cancer.

Lifestyle Changes

Quitting improves lung function almost immediately. Some evidence suggests that the benefits for the lungs are even more significant for women who quit than for men. It should be noted, however, that it can take 20 years or longer, particularly in heavy smokers, for the lungs to be restored to a fully healthy condition in which the risk for lung cancer is as low as for nonsmokers. Quitting is extremely difficult. No one should be discouraged if they relapse. Everyone should keep trying to quit. With continued efforts, many people succeed.

The many methods of quitting smoking include counseling and support groups, nicotine patches, gums and sprays, and incremental reduction.

At this time perhaps the most effective method for quitting is a combination of the following:

Nicotine replacement products that reduce withdrawal symptoms and cravings.
The antidepressants bupropion (Zyban) or nortriptyline (Pamelor, Aventyl), which reduce emotional effects and cravings associated with withdrawal, and improve abstinence rates.
Professional counseling or support organizations that may be effective, in addition to the medication, in helping people maintain abstinence.

[See In-Depth Report #41: Smoking.]

While people are in the process of quitting (and afterwards), they should maintain as healthy a lifestyle as possible.

Phytochemicals. Some data suggest that diets rich in fresh fruits and vegetables may be protective against lung cancer in both smokers and non-smokers. Some studies have reported protection from specific plant chemicals (phytochemicals), such as the following:

Isothiocyanates. These chemicals are found in cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts). They may help block the effects of carcinogens in smoke, suppress tumor growth, and inhibit growth-promoting steroid hormones.
Flavonoids. Major sources are apples, grapefruit, onions, red wine, and tea. In one study on flavonoids, apple eaters had the lowest cancer risk, 68% less than those who ate fruit infrequently. In another, those who ate relatively more onions, apples, and white grapefruit had less than half the lung cancer risk as people who ate relatively small amounts of these foods. Flavonoids are also found in soybeans, berries, broccoli, carrots, citrus fruits, eggplant, peppers, squash, and tomatoes. Specific flavonoids in dark chocolate may be protective against lung cancer (but not other cancers).
Lycopene. Lycopene is found in tomatoes, which have been associated with a lower risk for lung cancer. Cooking the tomatoes appears to increase the potency of lycopene.
Cryptoxanthin. Some studies suggest that eating foods rich in cryptoxanthin, a yellow-orange pigment, reduces the risk for lung cancer. Foods with high amounts of cryptoxanthin include pumpkin, corn, papaya, red bell peppers, tangerines, oranges, and peaches. More research is needed in this area, however.
Isoflavones. Isoflavones, found in soy beans and flax seed, behave like estrogen in some ways and not in others. Some evidence suggests the genistein (a type of isoflavone) in soy may have properties that are protective against lung cancer.

Click the icon to see an image of phytochemicals.

Note: Studies on these chemicals are not consistent. It is unlikely that individual phytochemicals offer protection, but rather that the benefits come from a collection of vitamins and plant chemicals contained in fruits and vegetables. Fruit, especially, appears to be protective.

Fats and Oils. Some studies have indicated that diets high in animal fats increase the risk for lung cancer. Others have suggested some protection from cod liver oil, which contains omega-3 fatty acids (found in fatty fish), omega-6 fatty acids (found in flax and in soybean and canola oils), and monounsaturated oils (found in olive and canola oils). Of interest was a 2002 study reporting that women who had a high intake of cheese had a lower risk of lung cancer. Despite these intriguing pieces of information, the ability of these substances to protect against lung cancer remains controversial, and discontinuation of smoking remains the best advice.

Click the icon to see an image of fats and oils.

Vitamin Supplements. Even with a healthful diet, smoking reduces the levels of a number of vitamins, importantly vitamin C. There is no evidence, however, to support any protection from antioxidant supplements, including vitamins E, A, or beta carotene.

In fact, evidence is now suggesting that high doses of vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta carotene supplements may have harmful effects. A 2000 study, for example, reported a higher risk for cancer in male smokers who took multivitamins plus A, C, or E. The strongest studies to date on negative effects of antioxidant supplements have reported an increase in lung cancer and overall mortality rates among smokers who took beta carotene supplements. In determining reasons for this disturbing effect, one animal study suggested that beta carotene increased enzymes in the lungs that actually promote cancerous changes. In other words, antioxidants may actually be harmful in people who already harbor cancer cells. This is particularly important information for smokers, who may carry precancerous or cancerous cells for years prior to developing the disease. The best way of achieving healthy levels of important nutrients is from healthy foods.

Click the icon to see the benefits of vitamin A.

Click the icon to see dietary sources of vitamin A.

Trace Element Supplements. Trace elements may be important in cancer risk and prevention.

Selenium appears to inhibit cell production and may have other anti-cancer properties. A few studies have reported some protection with selenium. However, a major 2002 analysis supports previous work, indicating that taking selenium helps only people who are deficient to begin with.

Click the icon to see the benefits of selenium.

Zinc may prove to be more important than selenium. Some research suggests that zinc may help protect smokers by blocking cadmium. Smokers have higher levels of cadmium in their body, and there may be a link between cadmium and a higher risk for lung cancer. Some laboratory studies have indicated that zinc might help protect against tumor progression. There is no evidence that taking zinc supplements will reduce the risk for lung cancer, however.

A 2003 study reported a lower risk in lung cancer in men and women who were physically active. Both moderate and intensive exercises were associated with protection.

People concerned about radon in their home or area can purchase a test approved by the Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for removing radon include installing a soil suction system. It should be noted, however, that home prevention measures rarely reduce radon levels to zero. Simply sleeping by an open window reduces the risk.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) both block cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. NSAIDs block COX-1 and 2, and coxibs selectively block COX-2. Evidence now strongly suggests that the COX-2 enzyme plays a role in blood vessel growth (angiogenesis) that can feed lung cancers.

NSAIDs. NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), and naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn, Naprelan, Anaprox). These agents inhibit COX-2, but they also target another COX enzyme. Studies are now reporting an association between regular use of aspirin or other NSAIDs and a reduced risk for non-small cell lung cancer.

COX-2 Inhibitors. The COX-2 inhibitors are more recent forms of NSAIDs. Currently, only celecoxib (Celebrex) is still on the market. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) were withdrawn from the market due to their high risk of causing strokes and heart attacks. Because they target the COX-2 enzyme specifically, researchers are focusing on these drugs for a possible role in treating lung cancer and preventing recurrence.

Diagnostic Tests

Chest X-Rays. In a small percentage of cases, a routine chest x-ray reveals the first signs of lung cancer. Usually, however, symptoms of existing lung cancer, such as coughing, chest pain, and blood in the sputum, will lead to a chest x-ray. If non-small cell lung cancer is present, chest x-rays may show lesions (damaged or abnormal tissue) in the center of the lung, cavities formed by squamous cell carcinoma, or lace-like pattern of cells spreading through the lungs. By the time lung cancer is diagnosed by chest x-rays, however, it has often spread so far that it cannot be surgically cured. Four major studies found no survival benefits in early detection from chest x-rays and sputum screening. Regular screening for lung cancer using x-rays is therefore not currently recommended.

Computed Tomography. Computed tomography (CT), particularly the specific technique called low-dose spiral (or helical) CT, is more effective than x-rays for detecting cancer in patients with suspected lung cancer. It is the standard imaging procedure for determining if and where the cancer has spread (metastasized). Surgeons also use CT scans to evaluate patients before lung surgery.

CT stands for computerized tomography. In this procedure, a thin x-ray beam is rotated around the area of the body to be visualized. Using very complicated mathematical processes called algorithms, the computer is able to generate a 3-D image of a section through the body. CT scans are very detailed.

The use of helical CT for early screening is still controversial. Studies of CT scans in smokers suggest that early screening will detect about 2% of lung cancers, most of these in early stages. In the studies, 62 - 82% of the patients with stage 1A cancer (when the tumor has not spread yet) were still alive at 5 years. Neither study, however, was controlled (compared with other groups, such as non-smokers). The survival figures were likely to be higher than in actual practice.

Click the icon to see an image of a CT scan of the chest.

Evidence regarding the survival benefits of early detection is not clear. Many experts are highly opposed to widespread screening for lung cancer. Some evidence, for example, suggests that lung cancer cells in non-small cell lung cancer are often very aggressive at microscopic levels (before a tumor is formed). If this were true, the cancer would be highly likely to have already spread, long before it was visible with CT scans. Moreover, some studies have found no association between tumor size at the time of diagnosis and survival times. On the other hand, some suspicious areas detected by CT scans may actually be innocent, and these patients might be more likely to die from aggressive treatments than from the disorder itself.

It should also be noted that about 98% of suspicious areas seen on CT scans turn out to be benign. Even after rescreening, many scans will show suspicious areas that turn out to be harmless but will require invasive and expensive biopsies. Additional experience with CT scans, however, may allow experts to better determine which abnormalities are likely to be benign.

High-risk individuals who are still interested in early screening with CT scans should ask their doctor about available clinical trials.

Computed tomography is the standard imaging procedure for determining if and where the cancer has spread (metastasized). Other imaging tests, however, may be useful for staging and tracking lung cancers (staging means finding out how advanced the cancer is).

Positron Emission Tomography. Positron emission tomography (PET), specifically a technique known as FDG/PET, is the most accurate noninvasive test for detecting early lung cancer. It is also the best imaging technique for staging lung cancers, not only those located in the lungs, but also those that have spread, particularly into the space between the two lungs (the mediastinum). With this imaging test, the patient is first injected with a specially formulated liquid sugar (called FDG), and then viewed with a machine that records energy given off by tumor cells.

PET is expensive and not widely available. However, its supporters suggest that it may prevent many unnecessary surgeries by identifying patients whose cancer has advanced past the stage at which surgery is helpful. There is some evidence that FDG/PET scan can detect a metabolic (processing) response to treatments that may help predict the outlook for the patient.

Scintigraphy. Scintigraphy is an imaging procedure in which patients are administered low-level radioactive agents that bind to cancer cells, which then can be tracked by special cameras to reveal the cancer cells' location and intensity. Agents selected are those that can best bind successfully with specific tumor types. For example, a 2001 study of the binding agent 111In-DOTA-LAN demonstrated excellent results in identifying non-small cell lung tumors. This study further suggests the possibility of using such highly-targeted binding agents as lung cancer treatments.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an imaging procedure that uses radio wave energy, is frequently used instead of CT scanning to locate brain and bone metastases that can be associated with lung cancer.

Biopsies of lung tissue are needed to confirm lung cancer. This requires invasive procedures that may vary from simple needle aspiration to chest surgery.

Needle Aspiration. Sometimes, a biopsy specimen is obtained by inserting a needle between the ribs, and then guiding it with the use of computed tomography scans, ultrasound, or fluoroscopy (a device allowing an x-ray view). Specific techniques include transbronchial or transthoracic needle aspiration (TBNA or TTNA) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (EUS-NA). Their use depends on how much of the area can be observed with less invasive imaging methods. There is a 5 -10% risk for bleeding or collapsed lung with needle aspiration.

Thoracoscopy. Thoracoscopy is usually very effective for diagnosing cancer in the outer areas of the lungs, or those involving the pleura (membrane surrounding the lungs). This is a surgical procedure that uses a fiber-optic tube to view the area:

The procedure requires general anesthesia.
The surgeon passes surgical instruments and a fiber-optic tube through a small incision in the chest. The tube has a camera in it, which allows the surgeon to look at the lungs on a video screen.

Bronchoscopy. To locate cancer that develops in the central areas and major airways of the lung (usually squamous or small cell cancer), bronchoscopy is typically performed. The procedure is done as follows:

The patient is given a local anesthetic, supplementary oxygen, and sedatives.
The doctor inserts a bronchoscope, a hollow flexible tube often containing a fiber-optic light source, into the lower respiratory tract through the nose or mouth.
The tube acts like a telescope into the body, allowing the doctor to see the windpipe and major airways. In a procedure called fluorescence bronchoscopy, the doctor injects the patient with a drug that makes cancer tissue appear red when exposed to laser light from the bronchoscope.
The surgeon removes specimens for biopsy, ideally combining techniques to include cutting tissue, brushings, and a washing process called bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). BAL involves injecting saline through the bronchoscope into the lung and then immediately suctioning the fluid back through the hollow tube of the bronchoscope; the fluid is then analyzed in the laboratory. Both brushing and washing procedures may be very valuable additions.

Advances in this procedure, such as laser-induced fluorescence endoscopic bronchoscopy, may improve early detection of cancer.

Bronchoscopy is usually very safe, but complications can occur; they include allergic reactions to the sedatives or anesthetics, asthma attacks in susceptible patients, and bleeding. Fever may follow the procedure.

Click the icon to see an image of bronchoscopy procedure.

Click the icon to see an image of a bronchoscope.

Mediastinoscopy. Mediastinoscopy uses a tube inserted between the lungs to locate the appropriate areas for biopsy. It is performed if the physician suspects that cancer has spread to nearby lymph nodes but has not yet metastasized.

Sputum Analysis for Presence of Cancer Cells. Some experts are now recommending an analysis of coughed-up sputum as a useful and cost-effective measure for identifying cancer cells, particularly those located in central areas of the lung. However, although sputum analysis appears to be as accurate as any other screening test currently conducted, it may miss cancers such as adenocarcinoma, which form in mucus-producing cells typically in the outer portion of the lungs. If a sputum analysis does not show cancer cells, but other signs of lung cancer are present, including blood in the sputum and suspicious areas on x-rays, other tests are performed.

Biomarkers. Biologic markers, called biomarkers, are high levels of substances that are released by tumors and indicate the presence of specific cancers. Biomarkers can be found in sputum, blood, and tissue samples. They can include enzymes, hormones, amino-acid compounds, antigens (identified by antibodies that specifically target them), growth factors, and other chemicals. Some biomarkers may prove to reveal the presence of cancer cells before they are evident on CT scans or other imaging tests. For example, genetic mutations, notably K-ras and p53, can now be detected in cells found in sputum, or cells taken during bronchoscopy. Such mutations occur only with cancerous changes and may enable early detection. Other markers that prove to be important for predicting aggressive cancers are high levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP9) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which are compounds involved with angiogenesis (the process in which blood vessels serving the tumor develop).

As part of the doctor's initial examination, patients may have a pulmonary function test to evaluate lung health and capacity. In addition, since the heart and lungs are often involved in complications following lung cancer surgery, the doctor may be especially interested in taking a complete history of those systems in patients who might need surgery.

Staging Systems

Tests to Determine Cancer Stage. After diagnosing non-small cell lung cancer, the doctor makes treatment choices by determining the cancer's stage (how large the tumor is and how far the cancer has spread). To stage the cancer and determine other aspects of the disease, a number of tests are conducted:

The cancer cells are examined microscopically for size, shape, and other configurations.
Computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or both, are used to scan the lung and perhaps other locations, such as the liver, upper abdomen, and brain, to determine the extent of the disease.

Physical Examination. A detailed physical examination of the whole body is very important to identify or rule out the spread of cancer to other areas, and to determine the general condition of the patient. For example, questions about dizziness or headaches can help the doctor determine if the cancer has spread to the brain, while bone or joint pain might suggest that the cancer has spread to the bone. The doctor will also look for head and neck symptoms that might reveal the presence of other tumors. Also, according to a 2000 review, the patient's weight loss and ability to function are two very important factors for predicting survival following treatment. Patients who are mobile and have lost less than 10% of their pre-treatment weight tend to have better survival rates.

In lung cancer, the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis is a major factor in determining how to treat the cancer, and how long the patient can expect to live. In general, survival is longest for patients with very early-stage disease and shortest for patients with very advanced disease that has spread to several regions of the body. Staging is based on the results of physical and surgical examinations, and laboratory and imaging tests, including biopsies.

To determine the stage, medical professionals first categorize each tumor by size and by how far it has extended. This identification method is called the TNM system.

The TNM categories then determine the stage (numbered 0 to IV), indicating how advanced the cancer is.

TNM stands for Tumor, regional lymph Nodes, and Metastasis (cancer spread beyond the original tumor).

T refers to the size and extension of the tumor itself. In TX and T0, the tumor is indicated by cancer cells in sputum or lung samples but cannot be seen. Tis: Carcinoma in situ. The cells are cancerous, but the tumor does not show evidence of spreading. In T1, the tumor is 3 cm or less in size, is still contained in the lung or the membrane covering the lung, and has not reached the main airway.

In T2, the tumor has one or more of the following features:

It is greater than 3 cm
It involves the main airway
It is 2 cm or more away from the ridge (the carina) at the lowest part of the windpipe
It has invaded the pleura
It is associated with collapsed lung tissue (atelectasis) or swelling that blocks part (but not all) of the lung

In T3, a tumor of any size has directly invaded any of the following:

Chest wall
Diaphragm
The membrane covering organs and structures in the chest
The outer wall of the membrane around the heart (pericardium)

In addition, one or more of the following conditions are present:

The tumor is in the main airway, less than 2 cm away from the carina, but is not in the trachea (windpipe).
The tumor is associated with a collapsed lung or swelling that blocks the entire lung.

In T4, the tumor has invaded any of the following:

The area between the lungs (mediastinum)
The heart
The great vessels (the blood vessels that carry blood from the heart)
Carina, trachea, or esophagus
Main portion of the spine

In addition, one or both of the following occurs: separate tumors are present in the same lobe; the tumor is accompanied by an increased amount of fluid between the pleural membrane and the lung.

N followed by a number from 0 to 3 refers to whether the cancer has reached regional (in the area of tumor) lymph nodes. In stage N0, the regional lymph nodes are still cancer-free.

In N1, the cancer has spread to the nearest lymph nodes around the airways, to the hilum (a central zone in the lung where blood and lymph vessels enter), or both. The tumor has extended directly into lymph nodes within the lung. In N2, the cancer has spread to lymph nodes in the middle of the chest that are still next to the affected lung, to the nodes below the carina, or to both regions.

In N3 the cancer has spread to lymph nodes in the middle of the chest that are next to the opposite lung, to the hilum in the opposite lung, to lymph nodes in nearby or opposite muscle tissue, or to lymph nodes above the collar bone.

M Stages refer to metastasis. In M0, metastasis has not occurred.

In M1 distant metastasis has occurred. This includes the presence of a separate tumor in a different lobe.

Staging factors are used to help determine treatment and outlook. The following suggest a more aggressive disease:

The presence of respiratory symptoms
A tumor larger than 3 cm
High numbers of blood vessels in the tumor

Researchers are always looking for more accurate ways to determine a treatment and outlook for lung cancer. For example, some research involves specific biomarkers and related blood vessel development within tumors. These markers might eventually help determine how aggressive a cancer is likely to be, and what the best treatment approach is.

If the cancer is still localized, surgery can produce 5-year survival rates of up to 75% in stage I patients and up to 50% in stage II patients. Unfortunately, very few patients are diagnosed at such early stages. In locally advanced stages, the standard treatment is concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. However, even with this approach average survival times are less than 2 years. Even if an initial tumor has been surgically removed or irradiated, cancer recurrence rates are very high. The risk for recurrence is lower in smokers who quit after treatment.

On an encouraging note, advances in therapies for later stage lung cancer are now offering some hope for improving survival. Still at this time, the mortality rate for lung cancer is still extremely high, and reports of improved response or survival rates using drugs or combinations of therapies do not mean cures. Ultimately, the patient must weigh a diminished quality of life using aggressive treatments against a chance for a modestly prolonged life.

Surgical Procedures

Surgery is performed in the following circumstances:

The surgical removal of an entire lobe or parts of a lung is the primary treatment for eligible patients in early stages of cancer. Recurrence is high after surgery, although the new tumor is often operable.
Some patients with stage IIIA cancer may also benefit from surgery. The intent at this stage is to extend survival time, rather than cure the disease.
Surgery is not out of the question in rare cases of metastasis when the cancer appears in a single operable location, such as the brain.

Unfortunately, lung surgery may be too risky for patients with other lung diseases or serious medical conditions, and because lung cancers tend to occur in smokers over 50, such health problems are likely to be present. Long-term survival rates appear to be better in patients treated at hospitals that perform large numbers of lung cancer surgeries, and when surgeries are performed by thoracic surgeons, who specialize in chest procedures.

The type of surgery depends on the amount of lung or other tissue that needs to be removed.

Wedge Resection or Segmentectomy. Wedge resection and segmentectomy remove only a small part of the lung; consequently, they preserve almost normal breathing function after the operation.

Lobectomy. Removal of one of the lobes of the lung is called lobectomy. The patient's lung function must be adequate before undergoing this procedure. The operation carries an overall mortality rate of 3 - 5%, with older patients having the highest risk.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing surgery to remove diseased lobes of the lung.

Pneumonectomy. Pneumonectomy removes the entire lung. The procedure itself carries a mortality rate of 5 - 8%, with the oldest patients having the greatest risk. In such patients, recurrence almost always occurs.

Surgical advances are allowing a wider range of options, including minimal surgeries for early cancers and surgeries that relieve cancer symptoms in late stages of the disease.

Thoracoscopy. Thoracoscopy, also known as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), is a less-invasive technique that employs a thin tube containing a miniature camera and surgical instruments. It requires much smaller incisions than open surgery and speeds recovery to the point that patients are up within hours. Though the procedure is not appropriate in all cases, it offers significant advantages, especially in older or frail patients. The death and complication rates following VATS are lower than those following conventional surgeries. Pain is reduced, and patients are released from the hospital quicker. Several studies found that the 5-year survival and recurrence rates in patients with stage I NSCLC treated with VATS were comparable to those in patients treated with traditional open chest surgeries.

Laser Surgery. Laser surgeries allow removal of minimal amounts of lung tissue and are proving useful for improving symptoms in stage II and IIIA patients. They may also be beneficial in treating cancers that have spread to the throat, obstructing it.

Photodynamic Therapy. Photodynamic therapy uses bronchoscopy and special laser light beams combined with a light-sensitive drug, called porfimer sodium (Photofrin), to kill cancer cells. The most common side effect is sun sensitivity. Serious side effects include bleeding in the lungs. Photodynamic therapy may be considered for patients in early-stage disease who are not candidates for other surgical procedures. It may also be used to reduce symptoms in late-stage disease.

Cryosurgery. Cryosurgery uses a probe chilled to below freezing to destroy the tumor cells on contact and is being investigated in combination with radiation therapy. It may also be an alternative in early stage cancer for patients who cannot have surgery.

Electric Cauterization. Electric cauterization, the use of electricity to produce heat that destroys tissue, is also under investigation as a treatment for early-stage disease.

Back Surgery. Spinal cord compression is a common cause of pain in patients with advanced lung cancer. Because such patients can live for a year or longer, some research indicates that back surgery followed by radiation therapy can significantly improve the quality of life for many of these patients.

Radiation Treatments

In addition to surgery, radiation is the other primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer. Doctors are also studying the benefits of radiation treatment in advanced lung cancer.

Radical Radiation in Early-Stage Cancer. Radical radiation is used as the sole procedure in stage I and some stage II patients who have adequate lung function but, for medical or other reasons, cannot be treated with surgery. In these cases, the 5-year survival rate is about 20%, and the cancer is likely to recur. Survival rates may be higher or lower, depending on the tumor size. In general, treatment with radiation therapy alone shows less benefit with larger tumors. A 2002 analysis suggested that the use of radiotherapy after surgery in patients whose tumors had been completely removed might be associated with reduced survival rates. Nevertheless, a recent study confirmed earlier results that show that radiation therapy by itself is as effective as surgery in patients who are unable or unwilling to have surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Combined Treatments for Improving Survival in Advanced Cancer. Radiation is also being investigated in various combinations with chemotherapy, surgery, or both. At this time, concurrent radiation treatment plus platinum-based chemotherapy may extend survival times in advanced lung cancer. Other combinations are showing promise.

Palliative Radiation. Doctors use palliative radiation to shrink tumors and reduce pain and symptoms. Palliative radiation is appropriate for patients with advanced disease and poor lung functions, or in those with metastasized cancer. In up to 85% of patients with advanced disease, palliative radiation therapy helps relieve pain, shortness of breath, the superior vena cava syndrome, coughing up blood, and symptoms caused by brain metastases. Radiation, in these cases, is not generally used with the intention of reducing mortality rates, although it may increase survival in some patients, such as those with excellent lung function whose tumors are small.

Delaying radiation therapy until symptoms develop does not appear to reduce survival times or impair quality of life compared to starting it right away, in patients with minimal or no symptoms.

Radiation Therapy in Metastasis to the Brain. Radiation is the primary treatment when cancer has spread to the brain unless the cancer is small enough to be treated surgically. When radiation is used, a technique called stereotactic radiosurgery may be used to deliver powerful, highly targeted radiation to specific areas in the brain. Some trials are investigating using radiation to the head to prevent metastasis to the brain.

The goal of radiation treatment is to administer doses as high as possible to kill as many cancer cells as possible, without destroying surrounding healthy tissues or causing a dangerous reaction. Doctors may try different procedures for the same patient. The exact radiation procedure depends on the site of the cancer or how far it has spread:

External-Beam Radiation. External-beam radiation therapy focuses a beam of radiation directly on the tumor. It is generally used for metastasized cancer.
Brachytherapy. Brachytherapy involved the implantation of radioactive seeds through thin tubes directly into the cancer sites. Brachytherapy may be used for lung cancers that have spread to the throat and caused obstruction. High-dose-rate brachytherapy may also have some value for patients with inoperable tumors in the central region of the lung.

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy gives smaller than standard doses a number of times a day (usually two or three). This allows doctors to use a higher cumulative dose over the whole course of treatment. It is not as useful as therapy by itself, but should be combined with chemotherapy to have any survival benefits.

Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy. Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) administers multiple doses per day but uses standard doses. This allows the total dose of radiation to be administered over a shorter time period than the standard 6 weeks. CHART is proving to extend survival rates of patients with localized cancer over that of standard radiotherapy or non-accelerated hyperfractionated radiation. It can cause severe swallowing problems. A modification in which treatment is suspended for 2 days out of 7 may help reduce this effect.

Three-dimensional (3-D) conformal radiotherapy delivers external-beam radiation designed to closely match the specific targeted organs or tissues. This allows significantly higher doses to attack the cancer while reducing the risk to healthy cells. In a 2003 report, 3-year survival rates in stage IIIA patients were nearly 60%, and nearly half the patients experienced no side effects.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy, an advance on conformal radiation, uses a body frame and an abdominal press to immobilize the patient's body and limit breath movement. This allows a more accurate delivery of high-energy radiation. The technique is still investigational.

Radiation can have significant side effects when used as part of intensive treatments, such as hyperfractionated radiotherapy or radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy. Among the most serious problems is severe inflammation in the esophagus (esophagitis) or the lungs (pneumonitis). Infection is also a danger.

The use of targeted approaches, such as conformal radiotherapy, may help reduce these complications. Investigators are also studying drugs, notably amifostine, which appear to help reduce throat and lung inflammation caused by radiation, without reducing its cancer-fighting effects.

Treatment Options by Stages

In the occult stage (TX, N0, M0), cancer cells are found in a sample of a patient's coughed-up sputum, but no cancer cells have yet been detected in the lung.

Treatment Options. Surgical removal of the tumor, if one can be located, allows identification of its stage and often results in cure.

Stage 0 or carcinoma in situ (Tis, N0, M0) are noninvasive cancers and only a few layers of cancer cells are detected within one local area. The cancer has not grown through to the top lining in the lung and can be surgically removed. There is a high risk for development of a second tumor, however.

Treatment Options:

Surgery, often a limited procedure, where only part of a lobe is removed from the lung.
In patients who cannot be treated surgically, consider photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy, or brachytherapy.

In stage I, the cancer has reached higher layers of the lung but has not spread into the lymph nodes or beyond the lung.

General Treatment Options. The primary treatment is surgery, such as lobectomy (removal of a whole lobe), if possible. Patients with poor lung function should undergo partial lobectomy, if possible. Radiation treatments may be appropriate and beneficial for patients who cannot have surgery. It is not clear if early-stage lung cancer patients, who have radiation or chemotherapy in addition to surgery, have higher survival rates. A 2002 analysis suggested that the use of radiotherapy after surgery in patients whose tumors had been completely removed might be associated with reduced survival rates. An analysis of studies using chemotherapy in addition to surgery or radiotherapy, however, indicated benefits in survival. The overall 5-year survival rates for early stage-cancer are in the range of 30 - 50%. Patients should consider clinical trials for prevention of recurring (returning) cancer after the initial treatment. The risk for recurrence is highest in patients who continue to smoke.

Stage IA (T1, N0, M0). The 5-year survival rates for stage IA patients after successful treatment can be as high as 80%. Treatment options are:
- Lobectomy or sometimes pneumonectomy (removal of one lung)
- Wedge or segment removal, particularly in patients with poor lung function who cannot withstand lobectomy
- Radiation in selected patients whose condition is inoperable (for example, frail patients with T1 tumors); 5-year survival rates can be equal to those with surgery, between 32 - 60%
- Clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery

Stage 1B (T2, N0, M0). Stage IB survival rates after treatment can be better than 60%. Treatment options are:
- Lobectomy or sometimes pneumonectomy; wedge or segment removal, particularly patients with poor lung function
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy following surgery
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy before surgery (induction therapy; studies are promising)
- Clinical trials for radiation treatments in selected patients whose condition is inoperable
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy before, after, or during radiation treatments

In stage II the cancer cells have spread to nearby lymph nodes.

General Treatment Options. Surgery, usually removal of a lobe (lobectomy) or one lung (pneumonectomy), is the treatment of choice. Five-year survival rates associated with stage II surgery can vary. A 2000 review of existing research places the numbers as high as 40 - 50%, but notes that they can drop to 25% and below if the cancer has spread beyond the immediate lymph nodes.

Patients whose cancer is inoperable may consider radiation treatments. In patients who can complete treatment, 5-year survival rates average 20 - 30%, with higher rates for stage IIA. Patients should consider clinical trials for prevention of recurring cancer after primary treatment. To date, however, supplementing surgical treatment with radiation or chemotherapy does not appear to prolong survival rates.

Stage IIA (T1, N1, M0). Survival rates can be as high as 60%. Treatment options are:
- Surgery
- Radiation
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy following surgery
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy before, after, or during radiation treatments
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy to reduce tumor size before surgery (induction therapy)
Stage IIB (T2, N1, M0) or (T3, N0, M0). Survival rates can be over 40%. Treatment options are:
- Surgery
- Radiation
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy following surgery
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy before surgery (induction therapy)
- Clinical trials of chemotherapy before, after, or given at the same time as radiation treatments

In stage III, the cancer cells have spread beyond the lung to the chest wall, diaphragm, or further lymph nodes, such as those in the neck.

General Treatment Options. Generally, the treatment of choice for stage III tumors is radiation and sometimes surgery, chemotherapy, or combinations of all three.

Combination approaches may be significantly more effective than single treatments. For example, of particular interest is a treatment approach that starts with chemotherapy and radiation, given at the same time, followed by surgery. In one study, 5-year survival in stage III patients treated this way was nearly 50%.

Stage IIIA (T1, N2, M0) or (T2, N2, M0) or (T3, N1, M0) or (T3, N2, M0).
- Surgery, if the tumor and affected lymph nodes can be completely removed. Consider platinum-based chemotherapy or radiation therapy after surgery.
- Radiation treatment plus platinum-based chemotherapy, given at the same time, is an option for those in otherwise good health. This regimen should be followed by surgery, if possible.
- Consider clinical trials using advanced radiation techniques, including continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation, or 3-D conformal radiation.
- Consider other clinical trials, including those of various combination treatments, preventive radiation therapy to the brain, and new second-line drugs.
Stage IIIB (Any T, N3, M0) or (T4, Any N, M0). Some patients may consider surgery if there is no lymph node involvement (T4, N0), and tumor can be removed. Surgery is not an option for other patients with stage IIIB cancer. Treatment options are:
- Radiation alone, usually for symptom control; it may improve survival in certain patients, such as those with lymph node involvement above the collar bone
- Chemotherapy alone
- Concurrent (given at the same time) cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiation, sometimes followed by surgery if possible
- Clinical trials using induction chemotherapy alone to shrink tumors, which may then be treated with surgery or radiation
- Clinical trials using advanced radiation techniques, including continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation, or 3-D conformal radiation
- Other clinical trials, including those of various combination treatments, preventive radiation therapy to the brain, and new second-line drugs

In stage IV (any T, any N, M1), the cancer has spread (metastasized) to other parts of the body.

Treatment Options are:

Combination of two- or three-drug chemotherapies that include platinum-based drugs and newer agents; the best patient candidates are those in otherwise good health, who have a limited number of distant metastasized sites. Chemotherapy is not recommended for patients who are too ill
External-beam radiation for symptom relief
Paclitaxel or gemcitabine as a single medication
Other clinical trials
If metastasized cancer involves only one or two areas in the brain, it may respond to surgery followed by radiation to the brain

Recurring or additional new tumors occur, usually in the lung again, in half of treated patients. Research shows that a single tumor in the lung is more often a new tumor that, in many cases, may be operable.

Treatment Options are:

Radiation for symptom control
Chemotherapy with or without bevacisumab (Avastin)
If the cancer spread to only one site in the brain, it may respond to surgery, followed by whole-brain radiation. Extended disease-free survival is possible. If the brain tumor is not operable, it is treated with radiation. Even if cancer returns in the brain (in 50% of cases), treating it again is possible in many patients, if the disease has not spread elsewhere
Laser therapy or interstitial radiation for tumors inside the airways
Stereotactic radiosurgery (in a few selected patients)

Chemotherapy Treatments

Chemotherapy is the use of drugs given by mouth or by injection to destroy cancer cells that may have spread beyond the tumor. Until recently, there has been some doubt about the effectiveness of chemotherapy for lung cancer. A major 2002 analysis of 52 trials supported its use, particularly with platinum-based regimens, and with the use of supportive care.

Chemotherapy in early stages: Chemotherapy is proving to be beneficial in many patients as an additional (adjuvant) treatment with surgery or radiation.
Chemotherapy in advanced disease: Chemotherapy may be used as first-line treatment in patients with inoperable or metastasized lung cancer. It is typically used in late stages to reduce symptoms and, in some cases, extend survival. Since 2006, the combination of bevacizumab (Avastin, a monoclonal antibody) and platinum-based chemotherapy is also a first line treatment choice for such patients, if the cancer is the non-squamous type

Powerful platinum compounds, either cisplatin (Platinol) or carboplatin (Paraplatin), are the basis for most chemotherapy regimens. Two-drug combinations, with one drug being a platinum-based agent, are currently the preferred regimens. Reasonable combinations include paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin or cisplatin. This regimen can also include gemcitabine, docetaxel, or vinblastine or its derivative (vindesine or vinorelbine). There does not seem to be any significant differences in effectiveness among them. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination might be a good option for patients who cannot tolerate platinum compounds. Chemotherapy for lung cancer may have reached its peak. Still, investigative chemotherapeutic drugs may yet improve response. Many experts are pinning their hope on agents called biologic response modifiers, such as gefitinib (Iressa) or LY900003 (Affinitak). To date, however, they have not achieved better results than standard platinum-based chemotherapies. Gefitinib (Iressa), a second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is now available only for a limited group of patients. These patients have benefited from gefitinib in the past, or they are enrolled in a clinical study with the drug. While this medicine initially showed great promise in clinical trials, results from a newer study failed to show that it prolonged survival in advanced lung cancer patients who failed other treatments.

If you are currently taking gefitinib, do not stop taking it without talking to your doctor.

Erlotinib (Tarceva) is in the same medication class as gefitinib. It is approved for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who have failed one type of chemotherapy treatment in the past (it is a second-line treatment). Unlike gefitinib, erlotinib shows survival and progression-free benefits compared to placebo. However, it should not be combined with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy treatments are usually performed in an outpatient setting and in regular cycles for several months. How many chemotherapy cycles to administer in late-stage cancers, the timing of those cycles, and the sequences of the drugs are still matters of investigation. For instance, research suggests that a three- or four-course cycle may achieve the same survival times and better quality of life than the standard of six or more course cycles. Changing even one day in a drug sequence can sometimes significantly affect outcome. Such fine-tuning of chemotherapy regimens is likely to have the most effect on patients with advanced-stage disease, which requires more tailored treatment than early-stage disease.

Treatment for lung cancer depends on the type of cancer and the stage of the disease. Chemotherapy is a form of treatment for lung cancer that may cure, shrink, or keep the cancer from spreading.

Side effects of chemotherapy treatments are common, and they are more severe with higher doses. Side effects increase over the course of treatment. Some trials suggest that they can be reduced by giving the drugs for shorter durations, without loss of cancer-killing effects. Common side effects include the following:

Diarrhea
Temporary hair loss
Weight loss
Fatigue
Depression
Nausea and vomiting: Drugs known as serotonin antagonists, especially ondansetron (Zofran), can relieve these two side effects. Serotonin antagonists work well in nearly all patients given moderate drugs, and in most patients who take drugs that are more powerful. In one study, a combination of dexamethasone (a steroid) with ondansetron, taken within 24 hours of chemotherapy, achieved either a major or complete reduction in nausea and vomiting.
Anemia: Anemia, an abnormally low number of red blood cells, is common in lung cancer. Treatments include transfusions or injections of erythropoietin, an agent that causes more red blood cell production. Erythropoietin is available as epoetin alfa (Epogen, Procrit) and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp), which requires fewer injections. These agents improve well-being and quality of life. Trials are in progress to determine if they may have survival benefits as well.

These side effects are nearly always temporary. Most patients are able to continue with normal activities for all but perhaps 1 or 2 days per month.

Serious complications of chemotherapy can also occur and may vary depending on the specific drugs. They include the following:

Increased chance for infection from suppression of the immune system.
Severe drops in white blood cells (neutropenia): Certain chemotherapy drugs, such as taxanes, pose a higher risk for this complication than other drugs. White blood cell count can improve with the addition of a type of drug called granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim and lenograstim).
Liver and kidney damage: Amifostine (Ethyol) reduces the risk for kidney damage in patients taking repeated regimens of cisplatin-based therapy. It is also a radioprotector; that is, it helps prevent severe effects in the esophagus from radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy.
Abnormal blood clotting (thrombocytopenia).
Allergic reaction, particularly to platinum-based agents: A simple skin test is under investigation that may identify people with a potential allergic response.

Second-line chemotherapy is used for patients whose cancers have recurred after first-line chemotherapy. Some experts believe that the longer survival rates for advanced lung cancer seen for the past 5 years may be due to these drugs. Because platinum-based agents are most often used first, they are not beneficial for second-line therapy. The following are commonly used second-line agents.

Docetaxel (Taxotere). Docetaxel is the drug of choice at this time for cancers that do not respond to initial chemotherapy. Studies have reported that it achieves longer survival times than supportive care alone. It is usually given every 21 days. This regimen causes more side effects than pemetrexed, the newer major second-line drug. Weekly doses of docetaxel are effective and less toxic than the 3-week schedule. It is not clear if survival rates are comparable to those of pemetrexed with that schedule, however.

Pemetrexed (Alimta). Pemetrexed, known as an anti-folate, is another promising new agent for second-line therapy and possibly for first-line treatment as well. The drug targets a number of enzymes that play a role in how cancer cells increase. Some research suggests that it is as effective as docetaxel. Pemetrexed does have some serious toxic effects, but they can be significantly reduced with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements. It is then less toxic than docetaxel, when docetaxel is given every 21 days, but not when it is given weekly.

Gefitinib (Iressa) and Other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Much research is focusing on drugs that block small molecules involved with the growth of blood vessels that feed the tumor (a process called angiogenesis). Compounds called growth factors, which may be important in cancer cell production, control the growth of these new blood vessels. Researchers, then, are interested in medications that literally turn off these growth factors or their receptors, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In so doing, the agents may be able to cut off cancer's lifeblood. Gefitinib and erlotinib are angiogenesis inhibitors that target receptors of an epidermal growth factor called tyrosine kinase. Interestingly, studies are finding that NSCLC tumors in people who have never smoked have a much higher rate of EGFR mutations. This helps to explain why gefitinib and erlotinib are more effective in treating NSCLC in people who have never smoked.

Gefitinib (Iressa) was approved in 2003 as a second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Many patients report significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life, and the drug initially showed great promise. In one study, gefitinib reduced tumor size by 50% in about 10% of the patients. However, recent large-scale clinical trial results have failed to confirm any survival advantage for most patients. At this time, gefitinib is available only for patients who have benefited from it in the past.
Erlotinib (Tarceva) was approved as a single agent second-line therapy in November 2004. Study results show that the drug prolonged survival by several more months than placebo (6.7 versus 4.7 months). Erlotinib is administered orally and has very low toxicity (rash and diarrhea are common).

Chemotherapy Following Surgery (Adjuvant Chemotherapy). Chemotherapy is being evaluated in combination with surgery, radiation therapy, or both. Fairly strong evidence is now supporting the use of platinum-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment after surgery in patients with lung cancers in stages Ib-IIIa, with some research indicating a 5% improvement in five-year survival rates. Not all studies confirm survival benefits, however, and trials are ongoing.

Chemotherapy before Surgery (Induction Chemotherapy). Some researchers are testing induction chemotherapy, which is used to shrink potentially operable tumors before surgery. Studies have been mixed in reporting any survival benefits in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Combined and Multi-Modal Therapy. In stage III cancers, investigators are researching very intensive treatments that use two or more combinations of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.

For example, radiation plus chemotherapy may be helpful in patients whose tumors are surgically removable.

In inoperable lung cancer, combining radiation with chemotherapy is proving to extend the time to recurrence, the overall duration of survival, or both, compared to radiation alone. Evidence also suggests that giving radiation treatments at the same time as chemotherapy (instead of in separate cycles) improves 5-year survival rates, compared to a sequential approach (separate cycles following each other). Chemotherapy and radiation treatments given at the same time are more toxic, however.

Other approaches use even more intensive multi-modal therapy. For example, some trials use radiation therapy with chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Patients are then sometimes given additional chemotherapy or radiation. In other promising regimens, patents are given concurrent radiation and chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy alone. Such approaches are very toxic but appear to improve survival in selected patients.

Severe inflammation in the esophagus is the most common severe side effect of the radiation and chemotherapy combination. There is also a very high risk of serious infections, including pneumonia, herpes zoster, and cytomegalovirus. Long-term antibiotic therapy may be needed.

Although patients over 70 may suffer more from toxic effects than younger patients, studies now suggest that they can achieve survival rates with combined treatments that are equal to those in younger patients.

There are many painkilling medications available. Research shows that aggressive pain relief can help patients manage cancer treatment symptoms (in addition to pain) better. For example, a 2001 study suggested that reducing pain in elderly cancer patients markedly lowered their fatigue levels, and improved other symptoms as well.

Opioids are the most potent painkillers. The correct use of these strong medications is very important for reaching acceptable pain relief, and preventing a toxic response. For example, the long-lasting version of oxycodone (OxyContin) must be swallowed whole; chewing, inhaling, or injecting it can create a deadly overdose.

Investigative Agents

According to a 2001 article, of the nearly 500 cancer drugs currently in development, 58 of them (about 13%) are aimed at fighting lung cancer. Only the number of breast cancer drugs exceeded that percentage. Unfortunately, none to date have shown any real benefit in terms of patient survival. However, some drugs are showing promise, and at this time, these agents are the best hope for improving lung cancer survival rates.

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are genetically designed immune factors. MAbs mark foreign compounds called antigens for attack by the immune system. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and cetuximab (Erbitux) are MAbs under investigation for lung cancer. Bevacizumab (Avastin) was approved in October 2006 as a first-line treatment (in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel) for inoperable, locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer.

All three of these MAbs block epidermal growth factor. These agents are of particular interest for patients who have cancers that produce too much of the protein called HER2. These agents show great promise in combination with chemotherapies and newer drugs, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors. For example, the disease-free survival time in patients with advanced NSCLC is longer when adding bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Antisense oligonucleotides are drugs being used to block molecules that result in too many cells that cause cancers. LY900003 (Affinitak), for example, targets an enzyme called PKC-alpha, which promotes tumor growth. Early studies with Affinitak showed some promising results. However, a 2003 study found no difference in survival when patients received Affinitak in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone.

Genasense (G3139, oblimersen) blocks Bcl-2. Bcl-2 is a protein that is expressed in abnormally high amounts in some cancers. This antisense drug is also under investigation.

Advexin, a genetic therapy that contains the p53 tumor-suppressor gene, is showing promise. In one early study, 60% of patients experienced partial or total tumor shrinkage when the agent was used in combination with radiation therapy. A 2006 study in Japan found that out of 13 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving Advexin, 10 had stabilized. Three of the stabilized patients remained stable for over 9 months. One patient had a partial response to Advexin. The only side effect of the multiple doses given was a passing fever that disappeared within 24 hours. Advexin is in Phase II clinical trials for NSCLC.

Vaccines use inactivated genetic materials from cancer cells, such as defective p53 or ras genes, to cause a highly targeted immune response to attack the cancer.

Retinoids are vitamin A-like antioxidant chemicals that help repair cell damage and appear to support growth of lung cells. A number of retinoid-like agents (retinal palmitate, TAC-101, 23-cis-retinoic acid, N-acetyl-cysteine) are being studied for the treatment or prevention of lung cancer.

Resources

www.cancer.gov -- National Cancer Institute
www.cancer.org -- American Cancer Society
www.cancercare.org -- Cancer Care
www.lungusa.org -- The American Lung Association
www.asco.org -- American Society of Clinical Oncology
www.alcase.org -- Alliance for Lung Cancer
www.lungcancer.org -- Joint project of Cancer Care and the Oncology Nursing Society
www.nccn.org -- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
www.lungcanceronline.org -- Lung cancer information
www.epa.gov/iaq/radon -- National radon information
www.clinicaltrials.gov -- Find clinical trials
www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials -- Find clinical trials

References

Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Niederhuber JE, Kastan MB, McKena WG. Clinical Oncology. 3rd ed. Orlando, Fl: Churchill Livingstone; 2004:1690-1701.

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2006.

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. Atlanta, Ga.: American Cancer Society; 2007:34.

Janne PA. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Never-smokers: A Biologically and Clinically Distinct Type of Lung Cancer. In: ASCO 2007 Educational Book. Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, Ill.: June 1-5, 2007.

Kagawa S, Fujiwara T, Saijo Y, et al. A multicenter phase I study of adenoviral p53 (ADVEXIN) in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 2564.

Mehra R, Moore BA, Crothers K, Tetrault J, Fiellin DA. The association between marijuana smoking and lung cancer: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 10;166(13):1359-67.

National Cancer Institute. Lung Cancer Home Page. Bethesda, Md.: U.S. National Institutes of Health. Available online.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 1.2007. Available online.

Tarceva [Package Insert]. Melville, NY: OSI Pharmaceuticals; 2005.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. List of Approved Oncology Drugs with Approved Indications. In: Oncology Tools. Available online.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Lung cancer screening. Ann Int Med. 2004;140:738-739.

Xin M, Deng X. Nicotine Inactivation of the Proapoptotic Function of Bax through Phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2005 Mar 18;280(11):10781-9.

Review Date:
8/3/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch).

A.D.A.M. Copyright

The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997-2009 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

adam.com

Low back pain

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:56 -0700

Overview

Signs and Symptoms
What Causes It?
What to Expect at Your Provider's Office
Treatment
Special Considerations
Supporting Research

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Low back pain affects 60 - 80% of the adult U.S. population. Low back problems affect the spine's flexibility, stability, and strength, which can cause pain, discomfort, and stiffness.

Back pain is the leading cause of disability in Americans under 45 years old. Each year 13 million people go to the doctor for chronic back pain. It is estimated that the condition leaves 2.4 million Americans chronically disabled and another 2.4 million temporarily disabled.

Back pain is the second most common reason why individuals in the U.S. seek medical care from their primary care doctors.

Signs and Symptoms

Tenderness, pain, and stiffness in the lower back
Pain that radiates into the buttocks or legs
Difficulty standing erect or standing in one position for a long time
Discomfort while sitting
Weakness and leg fatigue while walking

What Causes It?

Low back pain is usually caused by and injury - strain from lifting, twisting, or bending. However, in some cases low back pain can be a sign of a more serious condition, such as an infection, a rheumatic or arthritic condition, or a tumor.

A ruptured or bulging disk, the strong, spongy, gel-filled cushions that lie between each vertebra, and compression fractures of the bones in the spine can also cause low back pain, especially in older women with osteoporosis.

Age, poor overall fitness, heredity, smoking, and general life dissatisfaction increase a person's risk for low back problems.

What to Expect at Your Provider's Office

Your doctor will ask you to stand, sit, and move. Your health care provider will check your reflexes and perhaps your response to touch, slight heat, or a pinprick. Other tests may include strength testing on a treadmill, blood tests, x-rays, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and computed tomography (CT) scan.

Treatment

Lifestyle changes can often help relieve and prevent low back pain. You can lower your risk of back problems by exercising, maintaining a healthy weight, and practicing good posture. Learning to bend and lift properly, sleeping on a firm mattress, sitting in supportive chairs, and wearing supportive shoes are other important factors.

For long-term back pain, your doctor may recommend stronger medications or surgery.

Medications used to treat low back pain include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) such as ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil), opiates such as hydrocodone (Lortab, Vicodin), steroids such as prednisone (Deltasone), muscle relaxants such as carisoprodol (Soma), and oral or epidural steroids that reduce inflammation.

Complementary and Alternative Therapies

Alternative therapies can be effective for easing muscle tension, correcting spinal imbalances, relieving discomfort, and averting long-term back problems by improving muscle strength and joint stability.

Nutrition and Dietary Supplements

Following these nutritional tips may help reduce symptoms:

Eliminate all suspected food allergens, including dairy, wheat (gluten), soy, chocolate, corn, preservatives and food additives; avoid alfalfa sprouts, and onions. Your health care provider may want to test for food sensitivities.
Eat more antioxidant rich foods (such as green leafy vegetables) and fruits (such as blueberries, pomegranates and cherries).
Avoid refined foods, such as white breads, pastas, and sugar.
Eat fewer red meats and more lean meats, cold-water fish, or beans for protein.
Use healthy cooking oils, such as olive oil or vegetable oil.
Reduce or eliminate trans-fatty acids, found in commercially baked goods such as cookies, crackers, cakes, French fries, onion rings, donuts, processed foods, and margarine.
Avoid coffee and other stimulants, alcohol, and tobacco.
Drink 6 - 8 glasses of filtered water daily.
Exercise moderately at least 30 minutes daily, 5 days a week.

Nutritional deficiencies may be addressed with the following supplements:

Omega-3 fatty acids, such as flaxseed and fish oils, 1 - 2 capsules or 1 tablespoonful oil daily, to help decrease inflammation.
A multivitamin daily, containing the antioxidant vitamins A, C, E, the B-vitamins and trace minerals such as magnesium, calcium, zinc and selenium.
Glucosamine/chondroitin, 500 - 1,500 mg daily, for connective tissue support.
Alpha-lipoic acid, 25 - 50 mg twice daily, for antioxidant effects.
N-acetyl cysteine, 200 mg daily, for antioxidant effects.
Calcium/vitamin D supplement, 1 - 2 tablets daily if taking corticosteroids.
Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM), 3,000 mg twice a day, to help prevent joint and connective tissue breakdown.
Melatonin, 2 - 5 mg before bed, for sleep and immune system regulation.

Herbs

Herbs are generally available as standardized, dried extracts (pills, capsules, or tablets), teas, or tinctures/liquid extracts (alcohol extraction, unless otherwise noted). Mix liquid extracts with favorite beverage. Dose for teas is 1 - 2 heaping teaspoonfuls/cup water steeped for 10 - 15 minutes (roots need longer).

Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) standardized extract, 40 - 80 mg three times daily, for antioxidant and immune support.
Green tea (Camelia sinensis) standardized extract, 250 - 500 mg daily, for antioxidant and immune effects. Use caffeine free products. You may also prepare teas from the leaf of this herb.
Bromelain (Ananus comosus) standardized, 40 mg three times daily, for pain and inflammation.
Turmeric (Curcuma longa) standardardized extract, 300 mg three times a day, for pain and inflammation.
Cat's claw (Uncaria tomentosa) standardized extract, 20 mg three times a day, for inflammation.
Devil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) standardized extract, 100 - 200 mg one to two times daily, for inflammation.
Willow bark (Salix alba) standardized extract, 500 mg up to three times daily.

Capsaicin (Capsicum frutescens) cream

Homeopathy

Although very few studies have examined the effectiveness of specific homeopathic therapies, professional homeopaths may consider the following treatments to alleviate respiratory symptoms (such as those experienced from cystic fibrosis) based on their knowledge and experience. Before prescribing a remedy, homeopaths take into account a person's constitutional type -- your physical, emotional, and psychological makeup. An experienced homeopath assesses all of these factors when determining the most appropriate treatment for each individual.

Some of the most common remedies for this condition are listed below:

Aesculus for dull pain with muscle weakness
Arnica montana, especially with pain as a result of trauma
Colocynthis for weakness and cramping in the small of the back
Gnaphalium for sciatica that alternates with numbness
Lycopodium for burning pain, especially with gas or bloating
Rhus toxicodendron for stiffness and pain in the small of the back

Hydrotherapy

Contrast hydrotherapy may help. Alternate hot and cold applications. Alternate 3 minutes hot with 1 minute cold. Repeat three times to complete one set. Do two to three sets per day.

Castor Oil Packs

Apply oil directly to skin, cover with a clean soft cloth and plastic wrap. Place a heat source over the pack and let sit for 30 - 60 minutes. Repeat this procedure for 3 consecutive days.

Acupuncture

Reviews of clinical studies have found some support for the use of acupuncture for low back pain. In addition, acupuncturists frequently report success in treating low back pain, and the National Institutes of Health recommend acupuncture as a reasonable treatment option for this condition. An acupuncturist's management of low back pain often involves a comprehensive approach including specialized massage, application of warming herbal oils, and patient education.

Treating low back pain with acupuncture can be complex because many meridians (including the kidney, bladder, liver, and gallbladder) affect this area of the body. Local treatment to the painful areas and related sore points is often performed as well, with needles or moxibustion (a technique in which the herb mugwort is burned over specific acupuncture points).

A clinical study using acupuncture in 1,162 patients aged 18 - 86 years with a history of chronic low back pain found that at 6 months, low back pain was improved after acupuncture treatment --almost twice that of conventional therapy. Patients underwent ten 30-minute acupuncture sessions, generally two sessions per week.

Chiropractic

Spinal manipulation is among the most extensively studied and accepted forms of treatment for acute low back pain. According to a comprehensive review conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, spinal manipulation and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the two most effective treatments for acute low back pain. Of these, only spinal manipulation was judged to both relieve pain and restore function. Spinal manipulation also appears to be effective for chronic low back pain, but the evidence is less conclusive.

Massage

Massage may helpful for the prevention and treatment of short and long-term back problems.

Special Considerations

Chronic low back problems can interfere with everyday activities, sleep, and concentration. Severe symptoms may affect mood and sexuality. While depression is usually not the cause of chronic low back pain, it often complicates treatment.

Supporting Research

Aota Y, Iizuka H, Ishige Y, et al. Effectiveness of a lumbar support continuous passive motion device in the prevention of low back pain during prolonged sitting.Spine. 2007;32(23):E674-7.

Cherkin DC, Eisenberg D, Sherman KJ, et al. Randomized trial comparing traditional Chinese medical acupuncture, therapeutic massage, and self-care education for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1081-1088.

Chou R, Huffman LH. American Pain Society, American College of Physicians. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):505-14.

Chrubasik S, Eisenburg E, Balan E, Weinberger T, Luzzati R, Conradt C. Treatment of low back pain exacerbations with willow bark extract: a randomized double blind study. Am J Med. 2000;109:9-14.

Eisenberg DM, Post DE, Davis RB, et al. Addition of choice of complementary therapies to usual care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(2):151-8.

Haake M, Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1892-8.

Harden RN, Remble TA, Houle TT, Long JF, Markov MS, Gallizzi MA. Prospective, randomized, single-blind, sham treatment-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of an electromagnetic field device for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a pilot study. Pain Pract. 2007;7(3):248-55.

Hoiriis KT, Pfleger B, McDuffie FC, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing chiropractic adjustments to muscle relaxants for subacute low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jul-Aug;27(6):388-398.

Hu S. Review: surgery may be more effective than unstructured nonoperative treatment for chronic low-back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2558.

Jones MA, Stratton G, Reilly T, Unnithan VB. Recurrent non-specific low-back pain in adolescents: the role of exercise. Ergonomics. 2007;50(10):1680-8.

Keller A, Hayden J, Bombardier C, van Tulder M. Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007; [Epub ahead of print].

Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007;3(11):610-8.

Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Burr D, Schabo P, Maronitis A. Low back pain recurrence in occupational environments. Spine. 2007;32(21):2387-97.

Mens JM. The use of medication in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):609-621.

Mulholland RC. Scientific basis for the treatment of low back pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(7):677-81.

Pengel HM, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Systematic review of conservative interventions for subacute low back pain. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(:811-20.

Santilli V, Beghi E, Finucci S. Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations. Spine J. 2006;6(2):131-7.

Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Connelly MT, Erro J, Savetsky JB, Davis RB. Complementary and alternative medicine medical therapies for chronic low back pain: What treatments are patients willing to try? BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004; Jul 19;4:9.

Smith L, Oldman AD, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Teasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials in chronic neck and back pain. Pain. 2000;86:119-32.

Walsh AJ, O'neill CW, Lotz JC. Glucosamine HCl alters production of inflammatory mediators by rat intervertebral disc cells in vitro. Spine J. 2007;7(5):601-8.

Review Date:
11/30/2007
Reviewed By:
Ernest B. Hawkins, MS, BSPharm, RPh, Health Education Resources; and Steven D. Ehrlich, NMD, private practice specializing in complementary and alternative medicine, Phoenix, AZ. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Osteoarthritis

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:55 -0700

Overview

Signs and Symptoms
Causes
Risk Factors
Diagnosis
Preventive Care
Treatment
Other Considerations
Supporting Research

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis. It is a joint disease caused by the breakdown of cartilage -- the firm, rubbery tissue that cushions bones at joints.

Healthy cartilage allows bones to glide over one another, and cartilage absorbs energy from the shock of physical movement. In OA cartilage breaks down and wears away. As a result, the bones rub together causing pain, swelling, and stiffness.

OA may also limit the range of motion in affected joints. Most often, OA develops in the hands, knees, hips, and spine.

The disease affects men and women nearly equally. More than 20 million people in the United States have OA. Symptoms tend to appear when individuals are in their 50s and 60s.

Signs and Symptoms

Signs and symptoms of OA may include the following:

Joint pain (often a deep, aching pain) that is worsened by movement and improved with rest (in severe cases, a person may experience constant pain)
Stiffness in the morning or after being inactive for more than 15 minutes
Joint swelling
Joints that are warm to the touch
Crunching or crackling noise when the joint moves (crepitation)
Limited range of motion
Muscle weakness
Abnormal growth of bony knobs near joints which cause deformities (such as Heberden's nodes, in which bumps appear on the outermost finger joints)

Causes

Most of the time, the cause of OA is unknown. It is primarily a disease due to aging. However, metabolic, genetic, chemical, and mechanical factors can play a role in its development.

Risk Factors

Risk factors for OA include:

Increasing age
Genetic predisposition
Obesity
Injury to the joint
History of inflammatory joint disease
Metabolic or hormonal disorders (such as hemochromatosis and acromegaly)
Bone and joint disorders present at birth
Repetitive stressful joint use (such as with occupations like baseball, ballet dancing, and construction work)
Deposits of uric acid crystals in joints

Diagnosis

There is no single test to diagnose OA, so most doctors use a combination of methods to diagnose the disease and rule out the possibility other causes. A physical exam can show limited range of motion, grating of a joint with motion, joint swelling, and tenderness. An x-ray of affected joints will show loss of the joint space and, in advanced cases, wearing down of the ends of the bone and bone spurs.

Preventive Care

The following measures may reduce the risk of developing OA:

Protecting an injured joint from further damage
Exercising
Losing weight
Avoiding excessive repetitive motions

Treatment

The goals of treatment are to relieve pain, maintain or improve joint mobility, increase the strength of the joints, and minimize the disabling affects of the disease. The specific treatment depends upon the affected joints. A combination of conventional treatment and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may be most effective. Lifestyle approaches, including exercise, and many alternative medical therapies are becoming more popular and are considered safe and effective for the treatment OA.

Several natural remedies are at least as effective as conventional medication for symptom relief, and may help keep the disease from getting worse. Americans spend more on natural remedies for OA than for any other medical condition. Some of the most promising complementary approaches for treating OA include:

Reducing physical stress on the joint (lose weight and improve posture)
Lifestyle changes (particularly exercise)
Supplements including S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), glucosamine and chondroitin, and antioxidants
Herbs with anti-inflammatory properties, including boswellia, devil's claw, ginger, turmeric, white willow bark, and capsaicin (cream)
Acupuncture, including TENS or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Chiropractic
Physical therapy and magnet therapy
Yoga
Tai chi

Exercise

Exercise to strengthen, stretch, and relax muscles around affected joints is almost always included in a treatment plan for OA. Several clinical studies support the value of exercise for people with OA. Clinical studies also suggest that in addition to reduction of pain and disability, exercise improves strength, range of motion, balance and coordination, endurance, and posture.

Medications

The most common type of medication used to treat osteoarthritis are nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). They are common pain relievers that reduce pain and swelling. Types include aspirin, ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, Nuprin), and naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn, Anaprox). Although NSAIDs work well, long-term use can cause stomach problems, such as ulcers and bleeding. In April 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked drug manufacturers of NSAIDs to include a warning label on their product that alerts users of an increased risk for stomach bleeding.

Other medications used to treat OA include:

COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) -- Coxibs block an inflammation-promoting enzyme called COX-2. This class of drugs was initially believed to work as well as traditional NSAIDs, but with fewer stomach problems. However, numerous reports of heart attacks and stroke have prompted the FDA to re-evaluate the risks and benefits of the COX-2s. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra) have been withdrawn from the U.S. market following reports of heart attacks in some patients taking the drugs. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is available and labeled with strong warnings and a recommendation that it be prescribed at the lowest possible dose for the shortest duration possible. Patients should ask their doctor whether the drug is appropriate and safe for them.
Corticosteroids -- Also known as steroids, these medications are injected directly into the joint. They may also be used to reduce inflammation and pain. Steroids for inflammation inlclude prednisone (Deltasone) and dexamethasone (Decadron). Steroids, however, may cause side effects, such as weight gain, nausea, and fluid accumulation (edema). Steroids may also cause drug interactions. Ask a pharmacist or doctor.
Artificial joint fluid (Synvisc, Hyalgan) -- These medications can be injected into the knee. They may temporary relief pain for up to 6 months.

Surgery and Other Procedures

Surgery to replace or repair damaged joints may be needed in severe, debilitating cases. Surgical options include:

Arthroplasty (total or partial replacement of the deteriorated joint with an artificial joint)
Arthroscopic surgery to trim torn and damaged cartilage and wash out the joint
Osteotomy (change in the alignment of a bone to relieve stress on the bone or joint)
Arthrodesis (surgical fusion of bones, usually in the spine)

Nutrition and Dietary Supplements

Following these nutritional tips may help reduce symptoms:

Eliminate potential food allergens and foods that increase mucous production, including dairy (milk, eggs, cheese, sour cream, and ice cream), wheat (gluten), soy, corn, potatoes, cabbage, bananas, sugar, preservatives, food additives and excessive salt and meats. Your health care provider may want to test for food sensitivities.
Eat more foods that decrease inflammation, including garlic, onions, watercress, horseradish, mustard, parsley, celery, rose hips tea, pickles, lemon, and anti-inflammatory oils (nuts, seeds, cold-water fish).
Eat more foods containing digestive enzymes, such as papaya and pineapple.
Avoid refined foods, such as white breads, pastas, and sugars.
Eat fewer red meats and more lean meats, cold-water fish, tofu (soy, if no allergy) or beans for protein.
Use healthy cooking oils, such as olive oil or vegetable oil.
Reduce or eliminate trans-fatty acids, found in commercially baked goods such as cookies, crackers, cakes, French fries, onion rings, donuts, processed foods, and margarine.
Avoid coffee and other stimulants, alcohol, and tobacco.
Drink 6 - 8 glasses of filtered water daily.
Exercise moderately, for 30 minutes daily, 5 days a week.

You can address nutritional deficiencies with the following supplements:

Glucosamine/chondroitin, 500 - 1,500 mg daily, for joint health.
Omega-3 fatty acids, such as fish oil, 1 - 2 capsules or 1 tbsp. oil daily, to help decrease inflammation and improve immunity. Higher doses may be used by health care providers.
A multivitamin daily, containing the antioxidant vitamins A, C, D, E, the B-vitamins and trace minerals, such as magnesium, calcium, zinc, and selenium.
Digestive enzymes, 1 - 2 tablets three times daily with meals.
Coenzyme Q10, 100 - 200 mg at bedtime, for antioxidant and immune activity.
N-acetyl cysteine, 200 mg daily, for antioxidant effects.
Acidophilus (Lactobacillus acidophilus), 5-10 billion CFUs (colony forming units) daily, when needed for maintenance of gastrointestinal and immune health. You should refrigerate your acidophilus products.
SAMe (s-adenosyl-L-methionine), 100 - 200 mg before breakfast daily, to help decrease inflammation.

Herbs

Herbs are generally available as standardized, dried extracts (pills, capsules, or tablets), teas, or tinctures/liquid extracts (alcohol extraction, unless otherwise noted). Mix liquid extracts with favorite beverage. Dose for teas is 1-2 heaping teaspoonfuls/cup water steeped for 10 - 15 minutes (roots need longer).

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) standardized extract, 250 - 500 mg daily, for inflammation, and for antioxidant and immune effects. Use caffeine-free products. You may also prepare teas from the leaf of this herb.
Bromelain (Ananus comosus) standardized, 40 mg three times daily, for pain and inflammation.
Turmeric (Curcuma longa) standardardized extract, 300 mg three times a day, for pain and inflammation.
Cat's claw (Uncaria tomentosa) standardized extract, 20 mg three times a day, for inflammation.
Devil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) standardized extract, 100 - 200 mg one to two times daily, for inflammation.
Willow bark (Salix alba) standardized extract, 500 mg up to three times daily.

Capsaicin (Capsicum frutescens) Cream

Capsaicin is the main component in hot chili peppers (also known as cayenne). Applied to the surface of the skin, it is believed to deplete stores of a substance that contributes to inflammation and pain in arthritis. Several clinical studies have shown that capsaicin cream provided much better pain relief than a placebo but no improvement in joint swelling, grip strength, or function for people with OA. Pain reduction generally begins 3 - 7 days after applying the capsaicin cream to the skin.

Acupuncture

Several controlled clinical trials suggest that the ancient Chinese practice of acupuncture is an effective treatment for pain associated with OA, as well as for other aspects of the condition, including diminished joint function and reduced walking ability. In fact, a few clinical studies have shown that people with OA experience better pain relief and improvement in function from acupuncture than from NSAIDs such as aspiroxicam.

Chiropractic

Although there is no evidence that chiropractic care can reverse the joint degeneration that causes OA, some clinical studies indicate that spinal manipulation may:

Increase range of motion
Restore normal movement of the spine
Relax the muscles
Improve joint coordination
Reduce pain

A comprehensive review of the scientific literature suggests that chiropractic, especially when combined with glucosamine supplements and rehabilitative stretches and exercise, is an effective supplemental treatment for OA. Chiropractors will avoid using direct thrusts or pressure on red, swollen joints.

Physical Therapy

Physical therapy can be useful to improve muscle strength and the motion at stiff joints. Therapists have many techniques for treating OA.

Manual therapy and supervised exercise may decrease or delay the need for surgery in individuals with OA. In a trial evaluating physical therapy and exercise in people with OA of the knee, participants who received manual therapy to the lumbar spine, hip, ankle, and knees showed the following improvements:

Less stiffness
Reduced pain
Improved functional ability
Improved walking distance
Less need for knee surgery 1 year later

Magnet Therapy

Exposure to electromagnetic fields has boosted the number of cartilage-building cells and substances in laboratory experiments. One important study found that low-energy AC and DC magnetic fields stimulated the production of cartilage. For therapeutic purposes, users can apply magnets in one of two ways: directly to the skin surface over the bone or joint (capacitive coupling) or via pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) which induce an electrical current in the target tissue without making direct contact to the body (inductive coupling).

Clinical studies using either type of magnet therapy for arthritis are limited, and the few that exist have used poor methods, making it difficult to draw any definite conclusions. However, in one study of 78 people with OA of the knee, magnet therapy (applied to the knee for 6 - 10 hours per day over a period of one month) significantly reduced pain as compared with placebo.

Balneotherapy (Hydrotherapy or spa therapy)

Balneotherapy is one of the oldest forms of therapy for pain relief for people with arthritis. The term "balneo" comes from the Latin word for bath (balneum) and refers to bathing in thermal or mineral waters. Sulfur-containing mud baths, for example, have been shown to relieve symptoms of arthritis. However, hydrotherapy, which can be performed under the guidance of certain physical therapists, is occasionally used interchangeably with the word balneotherapy. The goals of balneotherapy for arthritis include:

Improving range of joint motion
Increasing muscle strength
Eliminating muscle spasm
Enhancing functional mobility
Easing pain

Although balneotherapy is most often used for psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis, some medical experts believe that it may be beneficial for OA as well. However, one large review of clinical trials found little evidence to support its use.

Ice Massage, Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation (TENS), and Electroacupuncture

In a well-designed trial comparing the effectiveness of TENS, electroacupuncture, and ice massage for the treatment of knee OA, each of these methods were found to:

Reduce pain at rest
Reduce stiffness
Boost walking speed
Increase quadriceps muscle strength
Increase knee range of motion

TENS is a technique used by many physical therapists. When the nerve stimulation of TENS is applied to acupuncture points, it is called electroacupuncture.

Mechanical Aids

A variety of mechanical devices, called orthoses, are available for people with OA to help support and protect joints. Made from lightweight metal leather, elastic, foam, and plastic, orthoses allow some movement within the affected joint and do not restrict nearby joints. For example, splints or braces help align joints and properly distribute weight. Shock-absorbing soles in shoes can help in daily activities and during exercise. Physical therapists use these mechanical aids most frequently to treat arthritic hands, wrists, knees, ankles, and feet. Orthoses should be custom-fitted by a physical or occupational therapist.

Homeopathy

Although people with OA are best treated with an individualized homeopathic remedy chosen by a professional homeopath, several trials have found that some common homeopathic combinations may be at least as effective as conventional medications for OA. Potential remedies include:

A topical homeopathic gel containing comfrey (Symphytum officinale), poison ivy (Rhus toxicodendron), and marsh-tea (Ledum palustre)
A combination homeopathic preparation containing R. toxicodendron., Arnica montana (arnica), Solanum dulcamara (climbing nightshade), Sanguinarra canadensis (bloodroot), and Sulphur
A liquid homeopathic preparation containing R. toxicodendron, Causticum (potassium hydrate), and Lac vaccinum (cow's milk)

Other Common Homeopathic Remedies for OA Include:

Calcarea carbonica (carbonate of lime or calcium carbonate)
Bryonia (wild hops)
Graphites
Guaiacum

Mind-Body Medicine

Chronic pain and disability can make daily functioning difficult. A holistic approach to care in these clinical circumstances may positively affect both lifestyle and how one feels overall. Many people report that relaxation techniques, such as guided imagery and meditation, are an important part of comprehensive, holistic care, and help to alleviate pain and other symptoms of OA.

Yoga

This ancient Indian practice is well known for its physical, psychological, emotional, and spiritual benefits and is often recommended in the West to relieve musculoskeletal symptoms. In one clinical trial studying OA of the hand, the group practicing yoga showed significant decrease in pain and improved range of motion compared to those participating in non-yoga stretching and strengthening sessions. Certain yoga "asanas" (postures) strengthen the quadriceps and emphasize stretching, both of which benefit people with OA of the knee. People with arthritis should begin asanas slowly and they should be performed only after a warm up. Yoga is best performed under the careful guidance of a reputable instructor.

Tai Chi

This ancient form of classical conditioning practiced in China for centuries has been reported in clinical studies to produce a number of benefits, including the following:

Improved fitness
Increased muscular strength
Enhanced flexibility
Reduced percentage of body fat
Diminished risk of falls in the elderly

In a clinical trial of subjects with OA of the knee or hip (ranging in age from 49 - 81), those who practiced tai chi twice a week for 3 months showed significant improvement compared to those in the control group in the following areas:

Overall sense of quality of life
Diminished feelings of stress/tension
Increased satisfaction with general health
Decreased fatigue
Easier self management of arthritis symptoms

Other Considerations

Pregnancy

Many of the herbs used in treatment for OA have not been tested on pregnant women and some are known to be unsafe for women who are pregnant. For this reason, pregnant women should take substances for pain and other symptoms only under the supervision of their obstetrician.

Prognosis and Complications

Complications of OA include:

Inability to walk due to very advanced hip or knee OA
Gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased kidney function resulting from long-term NSAID use

Many people are able to control OA and prevent the condition from worsening over time. Joint deterioration in OA tends to be slower than that of rheumatoid arthritis, but knee OA is still the number one cause of disability in industrialized countries such as the United States. Increased fluid in joints and joint enlargement occur later in the course of the disease. In the most advanced stages, OA can cause full cartilage loss. In some cases joint replacement may become necessary. While OA can be a debilitating condition, current treatments have shown great promise in reducing pain and improving mobility.

Supporting Research

Bijlsma JW, Knahr K. Strategies for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. BestPract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(1):59-76.

Chrubasik JE, Roufogalis BD, Chrubasik S. Evidence of effectiveness of herbal antiinflammatory drugs in the treatment of painful osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain. Phytother Res. 2007;21(7):675-83.

Clark KL. Nutritional considerations in joint health. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26(1):101-18.

Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Wittink DR. Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jun;164(12):1299-1304.

Frech TM, Clegg DO. The utility of nutraceuticals in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9(1):25-30.

Gorsline RT, Kaeding CC. The use of NSAIDs and nutritional supplements in athletes with osteoarthritis: prevalence, benefits and consequences. Clin Sports Med.2005 Jan;24(1):71-82.

Kolasinski SL, Garfinkel M, Tsai AG, Matz W, Dyke AV, Schumacher HR. Iyengar yoga for treating symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knees: a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):689-693.

Laufer S. Osteoarthritis therapy -- are there still unmet needs? Rheumatology. 2004 Feb;43;Suppl 1:i9-15.

Lee C, Straus WL, Balshaw R, Barlas S, Vogel S, Schnitzer TJ. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents versus acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct;51(5)746-54.

Leeb BF, Schweitzer KM, Smolen JS. A metaanalysis of chondroitin sulfate in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):205-211.

Lin J, Zhang W, Jones A, Doherty M. Efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2004 Aug;329(7461):324.

Long L, Ernst E. Homeopathic remedies for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Br Homeopath J. 2001;90:37-43.

Mehta K, Gala J, Bhasale S, et al. Comparison of glucosamine sulfate and a polyherbal supplement for the relief of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN25438351]. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007;7(1):34 [Epub ahead of print].

Morelli V, Naquin C, Weaver V. Alternative therapies for traditional disease states: osteoarthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jan;67(2):339-344.

Neugebauer V, Han JS, Adwanikar H, Fu Y, Ji G. Techniques for assessing knee joint pain in arthritis. Mol Pain. 2007;3:8.

Owens S, Wagner P, Vangsness CT. Recent advances in glucosamine and chondroitin supplementation. J Knee Surg. 2004 Oct;17(4):185-193.

Piscoya J, Rodriguez Z, Bustamante SA, Okuhama NN, Miller MJ, Sandoval M. Efficacy and safety of freeze-dried cat's claw in osteoarthritis of the knee: mechanisms of action of the species Uncaria guianensis. Inflamm Res. 2001;50(9):442-448.

Reginster JY, Bruyere O, Neuprez A. Current role of glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007;46(5):731-5.

Sun BH, Wu CW, Kalunian KC. New developments in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(1):135-48.

Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Shields N, Bruder A. Therapeutic exercise in physiotherapy practice is beneficial: a summary of systematic reviews 2002-2005. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(1):7-16.

Towheed TE, Anastassiades T. Glucosamine therapy for osteoarthritis: an update. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(9):1787-90.

Wise CM. Crystal-associated arthritis in the elderly. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(1):33-55.

Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Jena S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2005 Jul;366(9480):136-143.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Systemic lupus erythematosus

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:34:55 -0700

Overview

Signs and Symptoms
What Causes It?
Who's Most At Risk?
What to Expect at Your Provider's Office
Treatment Options
Prognosis/Possible Complications
Following Up
Supporting Research

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most common form of lupus. Lupus is an autoimmune disorder in which the body harms its own healthy cells and tissues. This leads to inflammation and damage of body tissues in the joints, skin, kidneys, heart, lungs, blood vessels, or the brain. Lupus is also considered a rheumatic disorder because it can cause aches, pain, and stiffness in the joints, muscles, and bones.

Lupus usually first affects people between the ages of 15 - 45 years, but it can also occur in childhood or later in life. Patients experience periods of chronic disease and remission. The prevalence of the disease is not precisely known, ranging from an estimated 15 - 50 cases per 100,000 people.

Signs and Symptoms

Lupus is often accompanied by the following signs and symptoms.

Extreme fatigue
Painful or swollen joints (arthritis)
Muscle pain and stiffness
Unexplained fever
Skin rashes, including a "butterfly" rash over the nose and cheeks
Kidney problems
Hair loss
Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain
Headaches, migraine, seizures, stroke
Depression, anxiety, confusion
Photosensitivity (sensitivity to sunlight)

What Causes It?

The cause of lupus is unknown. Many researchers suspect it occurs following infection with an organism that looks similar to particular proteins in the body, which are later mistaken for the organism and wrongly targeted for attack.

Who's Most At Risk?

The following categories of people are at higher than average risk for lupus:

Many more women than men have lupus.
Lupus is more common in black women and women of Hispanic, Asian, and Native American descent than in white women.
Lupus can run in families, but the risk that a child or a brother or sister of a patient also will have lupus is quite low.

What to Expect at Your Provider's Office

If you are experiencing symptoms associated with lupus, you should see your health care provider. A team of specialists usually becomes involved in making a diagnosis and determining which treatment or combination of therapies will work best for you. Because lupus is so complex, reaching a diagnosis may gradually take time as new symptoms appear.

A diagnosis of lupus is based on a physical examination and the results of laboratory tests, including the following:

Complete blood count.
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) - an elevated ESR indicates inflammation in the body
Urinalysis.
Blood chemistries.
Complement test (a blood test that measures severity of infection).
Antinuclear antibody test (ANA) - positive in most lupus patients.
Other antibody tests.
Syphilis test (may be falsely positive in people with lupus).
Skin or kidney biopsy.

Imaging techniques may be used to evaluate central nervous system changes or problems and other symptoms associated with lupus.

Treatment Options

Prevention

While lupus itself cannot be prevented, there are ways to prevent flare-ups. These include the following:

Avoiding sun exposure, high-dose birth control pills, penicillin, and sulfonamides (anti-bacterial agents)
Exercising regularly
Receiving flu and pneumococcal vaccines

Treatment Plan

There is no known cure for lupus. However, your team of health care professionals can develop a treatment plan to prevent flare-ups, to treat them when they do occur, and to minimize complications.

Drug Therapies

Your health care provider may prescribe the following medications:

Corticosteroid hormones, to rapidly suppress inflammation. For patients who cannot take corticosteroids, a type of immunosuppressive drug called methotrexate may be used.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to control pain, swelling, and fever.
Antimalarials, to treat fatigue, joint pain, skin rashes, and inflammation of the lungs, and to prevent flare-ups from recurring.
Immunosuppressives, which restrain the overactive immune system by blocking the production of some immune cells and curbing the action of others.
Intravenous gamma globulin, a blood protein that increases immunity, helps fight infection, and controls acute bleeding.

Surgical and Other Procedures

Surgery is sometimes performed for lupus-related ailments.

Complementary and Alternative Therapies

A comprehensive treatment plan for lupus may include a range of complementary and alternative therapies.

Nutrition and Supplements

Nutritional tips for patients with lupus include the following.

Eliminate all suspected food allergens, including dairy, wheat (gluten), soy, chocolate, corn, preservatives and food additives. Avoid alfalfa sprouts and onions. Your health care provider may want to test you for food allergies.
Eat more antioxidant-rich foods (such as green, leafy vegetables) and fruits (such as blueberries, pomegranates, and cherries).
Avoid refined foods, such as white breads, pastas, and sugar.
Eat fewer red meats and more lean meats, cold-water fish, or beans for protein.
Use healthy cooking oils, such as olive oil or vegetable oil.
Reduce or eliminate trans-fatty acids, found in commercially baked goods such as cookies, crackers, cakes, French fries, onion rings, donuts, processed foods, and margarine.
Avoid coffee and other stimulants, alcohol, and tobacco.
Drink 6 - 8 glasses of filtered water daily.
Exercise moderately at least 30 minutes daily, 5 days a week.

Nutritional deficiencies may be addressed with the following supplements:

Omega-3 fatty acids, such as flaxseed and fish oils, 1 - 2 capsules or 1 tablespoonful oil daily, to help decrease inflammation. Cold-water fish, such as salmon or halibut, are good sources.
A multivitamin daily, containing the antioxidant vitamins A, C, E, the B-vitamins and trace minerals, such as magnesium, calcium, zinc, and selenium.
Alpha-lipoic acid, 25 - 50 mg twice daily, for antioxidant effects.
N-acetyl cysteine, 200 mg daily, for antioxidant effects.
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), start at 5 mg three times a day and work up to 100 mg per day for 7 - 12 months. If adverse effects develop, discontinue use and consult your health care provider.
Calcium and vitamin D supplement, 1 - 2 tablets daily if taking corticosteroids.
Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM), 3,000 mg twice a day, to help prevent joint and connective tissue breakdown.
Melatonin, 2 - 5 mg before bed, for sleep and immune system regulation.

Herbs

Herbs are generally available as standardized, dried extracts (pills, capsules, or tablets), teas, or tinctures/liquid extracts (alcohol extraction, unless otherwise noted). Mix liquid extracts with favorite beverage. Dose for teas is 1 - 2 heaping teaspoonfuls per cup of water steeped for 10 - 15 minutes (roots need longer).

Green tea (Camelia sinensis) standardized extract, 250 - 500 mg daily, for antioxidant effects. Use caffeine-free products. You may also prepare teas from the leaf of this herb.
Tripterygium wilfordii, 180 - 360 mg daily, a Chinese herb for immune system function. You may also prepare teas from the root of this herb.

Homeopathy

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of specific homeopathic remedies. Professional homeopaths, however, may recommend one or more of the following treatments for lupus based on their knowledge and clinical experience. Before prescribing a remedy, homeopaths take into account a person's constitutional type. In homeopathic terms, a person's constitution is his or her physical, emotional, and intellectual makeup. An experienced homeopath assesses all of these factors when determining the most appropriate remedy for a particular individual.

Apis mellifica
Arsenicum album
Calcarea carbonica
Causticum
Rhus toxicodendron
Ruta graveolens
Thuja occidentalis

Acute dose is 3 - 5 pellets of 12X to 30C every 1 - 4 hours until symptoms are relieved.

Acupuncture

Acupuncture may help balance the immune system during remissions, and alleviate flare-ups. Acupuncture also may reduce pain and stiffness.

Prognosis/Possible Complications

The prognosis for lupus patients is mixed. Half of lupus patients who go into remission remain so for decades, but 90% of patients have complications. For women, symptoms tend to decrease after menopause. Ninety percent of patients have a survival rate of 10 years, and 63 - 75% have a survival rate of 20 years. Patients with certain complications from lupus tend to have a poor prognosis. The major cause of lupus-related death is infection.

Following Up

Patients need to be closely monitored during flare-ups to determine the appropriate course of treatment and induce remission.

Supporting Research

Bartram T. Encyclopedia of Herbal Medicine. Dorset, England: Grace Publishers; 1995:278.

Bast A, Haenen GR. Lipoic acid: a multifunctional antioxidant. Biofactors. 2003;17(1-4):207-13.Cabrera C, Artacho R, Gimenez R. Beneficial effects of green tea--a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006;25(2):79-99.

Carillo-Vico A, Reiter RJ, Lardone PJ, et al., The modulatory role of melatonin on immune responsiveness. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2006;7(5):423-31.

Cecil R, ed. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 20th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: W.B. Saunders; 1996.

Dambro MR. Griffith's 5-Minute Clinical Consult. 1999 ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.; 1999.

Dryden GW Jr, Deaciuc I, Arteel G, McClain CJ. Clinical implications of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005;7(4):308-16.

Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, et al, eds. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 14th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1998.

Koopman WJ, ed. Arthritis and Allied Conditions. 13th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, Inc.; 1997.

Morrison R. Desktop Guide to Keynotes and Confirmatory Symptoms. Albany, Calif: Hahnemann Clinic Publishing; 1993:39-44, 82-87, 272-276, 390-392.

Ramgolam V, Ang SG, Lai YH, Loh CS, Yap, HK. Traditional Chinese medicines as immunosuppressive agents. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000;29(1):11-6.

Rotsein OD. Oxidants and antioxidant therapy. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(1):239-47.

Simopoulos AP. Omega-3 fatty acids in inflammation and autoimmune diseases. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002;21(6):495-505.

Tao X, Lipsky PE. The Chinese anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive herbal remedy Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000;26(1):29-50, viii.

Val Vollenhoven RD, Engleman, EG, McGuire JL. An open study of dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1994;37:1305-1310.

van Vollenhoven RF. Dehydroepiandrosterone for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002;3(1):23-31.

Werbach M. Nutritional Influences on Illness. New Canaan, Conn: Keats Publishing Inc;1987:292-296.

Review Date:
8/4/2006
Reviewed By:
Ernest B. Hawkins, MS, BSPharm, RPh, Health Education Resources; and Steven D. Ehrlich, N.M.D., private practice specializing in complementary and alternative medicine, Phoenix, AZ. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Colon and rectal cancers

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:05 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Symptoms
Risk Factors
Dietary Factors
Prevention
Diagnosis
Staging
Prognosis
Surgery
Medications
Radiation Treatment
Follow-up Testing
Treatment for Metastasized ...
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Drug Approval

In September 2006, the Food and Drug Administration approved panitumumab (Vectibix) for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body following chemotherapy. Like cetuximab (Ertibux), panitumumab targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on cancer cells. Panitumumab is the first new colorectal cancer drug approved since 2004. The FDA granted accelerated approval to panitumumab based on a clinical trial of patients with metastatic cancer. The average time to disease progression or death was 96 days in patients treated with panitumumab compared to 60 days in patients who received standard care.

Diet and Colorectal Cancer Recurrence

Evidence indicates that diet plays a role in colorectal cancer prevention. Now, a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) suggests that dietary factors also affect the risk of cancer recurrence. Patients with stage III colorectal cancer who ate lots of red meat, refined grains, and sweets had a higher risk of cancer recurrence and death than patients whose diets were high in fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish.

Folic Acid No Good for Prevention?

Many experts have long believed that folic acid supplements may help protect against colorectal cancer. But according to a 2007 JAMA study, high-dose folic acid supplements may not prevent colorectal cancer and may actually increase the risk for adenomatous polyp formation. Adenomatous polyps are benign colorectal tumors that can potentially become cancerous. In the study, patients who took folic acid supplements had a greater risk of developing new, more numerous, and larger adenomatous polyps than patients who did not take the supplements.

NSAIDS Not Recommended for Colorectal Cancer Prevention

In March 2007, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against the routine use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to prevent colorectal cancer in people who are at average risk for this disease. Several recent studies have indicated that aspirin, and NSAIDs such as celecoxib (Celebrex), can help prevent colorectal cancer. But the USPSTF notes that the risks of these drugs outweigh the benefits. Long-term daily use of NSAIDs increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney function problems, and heart attack and stroke.

Introduction

Cancers of the colon and rectum, often referred to collectively as colorectal cancer, are life-threatening tumors that develop in the large intestine.

More than 80% of colorectal tumors evolve from adenomatous polyps. These gland-like growths develop on the mucous membrane that lines the large intestine. They are usually either:

Tubular polyps, which protrude mushroom-like
Villous adenomas, which are flat and spreading and are more apt to become malignant (cancerous)

Polyps are very common and almost always benign. Their numbers increase with age. Polyps are found in about 25% of people by age 50, and 50% of people by age 75. Fewer than 1% of polyps under 1 centimeter (slightly less than half an inch) become cancerous. About 10% of larger polyps become cancerous within 10 years, and about 25% of these larger polyps become cancerous after 20 years. Certain inherited polyps can become cancerous more rapidly.

Digestion takes place in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, essentially a long tube that extends from the mouth to the anus. It is a complex organ system that first carries food from the mouth down the esophagus to the stomach. Food then travels through the small and large intestines before being excreted through the rectum and out the anus.

The esophagus, stomach, large and small intestine -- aided by the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas -- convert the nutritive components of food into energy and break down the non-nutritive components into waste to be excreted.

The esophagus is a narrow muscular tube, about 9 1/2 inches long that begins below the tongue and ends at the stomach.

In the stomach, acids and stomach motion break food down into particles small enough so that the small intestine can absorb nutrients.

Click the icon to see an image of stomach anatomy.

The small intestine, despite its name, is the longest part of the gastrointestinal tract, extending for about 20 feet. Food passes from the stomach through its three parts: first the duodenum, then the jejunum, and finally the ileum. Most of the digestive process occurs in the small intestine.

Click the icon to see an image of small intestine anatomy.

Undigested material, such as plant fiber, is passed next to the large intestine, mostly in liquid form. The large intestine is wider than the small intestine but only about 6 feet long. It is the final portion of the digestive tract and includes the cecum, the appendix, the colon, and the rectum, which extends to the anus.

Cecum and Appendix. The cecum and the appendix are located in the lower-right quadrant of the abdomen.

Colon. The colon absorbs excess water and salts into the blood. The remaining waste matter is converted to feces through bacterial action. The colon is divided into four major sections.

Click the icon to see an image of large intestine anatomy.

The first section, the ascending colon, extends upward from the cecum on the right side of the abdomen.
The second section, the transverse colon, crosses the upper abdomen to the left side.
The third section extends downward on the left side of the abdomen toward the pelvis and is called the descending colon.
The final section is the sigmoid colon.

Rectum and Anus. Feces are stored in the descending and sigmoid colon until they are passed through the rectum and anus. The rectum extends through the pelvis from the end of the sigmoid colon to the anus.

Causes

In most cases of colon or rectal cancers, the cause or causes are unknown. Defects in genes that normally protect against cancer play the major role in causing polyp cells to continuously spread and become cancerous. Some of these cases are caused by inherited genetic defects, and such patients usually have family histories of colorectal cancer. Most of the genetic mutations involved in colon cancers, however, appear to arise spontaneously (no strong family history) rather than being inherited. In such cases, environmental or other factors trigger genetic changes in the intestine that lead to cancer.

About 6% of cases of colon cancer are due to inherited factors.

APC Gene and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). When the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene is normal, it helps suppress tumor growth. In its defective form, it permits high levels of the protein beta-catenin to accumulate, which accelerates cell growth leading to polyps. Various genetic mutations that affect the APC gene directly or indirectly have been identified:

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare and serious disorder in which the patient inherits an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation from either parent. It occurs in about 1 in 8,000 people. During early adulthood, hundreds to thousands of polyps grow in the colon. FAP causes less than 1% of all cases of colorectal cancer, but if untreated, virtually everyone who inherits this condition develops cancer before the age of 40. Many of the deaths attributed to FAP can be prevented with early and aggressive surgical treatment.
Non-inherited mutations of the APC gene have been detected in nearly all patients with spontaneous colon cancers.

Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC). Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, accounts for at least half of colorectal cancers that run in families. (However, only 3% or less of all colorectal cancers are due to this problem). About 50 - 80% of people who inherit the abnormal gene will develop colon cancer. HNPCC tends to develop in the right side of the colon, often in young individuals. (Left-sided cancers can still occur as well.)

People who inherit HNPCC and other defects are prone to other cancers, including uterine and ovarian cancers, as well as cancers of the small intestine and kidney system (very rare). HNPCC is highly associated with genes containing an abnormality called microsatellite instability (MSI), which is a sign of defective DNA repair. Testing tumors for MSI in people with newly diagnosed colon cancer who also have a family history of the disease may prove to be an effective method for identifying patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Tests are being developed that can detect the actual HNPCC genetic abnormality (mutation) that was inherited from a father or mother. The two most commonly affected genes are MSH2 and MLH1.

Cyclooxygenases and Prostaglandins. Cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1 and COX-2) are enzymes involved in the production of prostaglandins, substances produced by the body that cause inflammation, widen and narrow blood vessels, control muscle contractions, and inhibit hormones that regulate fat metabolism. COX-2, but not COX-1, appears to play a role in the development and spread of colorectal tumors. COX-2 increases the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which, in turn, stimulates factors that inhibit apoptosis, the natural process whereby all cells, including cancerous ones, self-destruct. It also activates interleukin-6 (IL-6), a factor in the immune system that is associated with cancer cell invasion.

C-Reactive Protein (CRP). CRP is another indicator of inflammation. In a 2004 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, elevated CRP levels predicted the development of colon -- but not rectal -- cancer.

Bile Acid Salts. Deoxycholic acid, which is found in the fat-digesting bile salts released by the gallbladder, appears to have carcinogenic properties. Its effects are now believed to play a role in some cases of colon cancer. Levels of the acid can rise as a result of high-fat diets or certain diseases.

Growth Factors. Chronically higher circulating levels of growth factors, including insulin-like growth factor, have been associated with colorectal cancer.

Inflammatory bowel diseases include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These chronic disorders cause persistent injuries in the intestinal tract that can, in some cases, produce cancerous changes.

Symptoms

It is possible to have colon or rectal cancer without symptoms. Many patients are free of symptoms until their tumors are quite advanced.

Weight loss and changes in bowel movements are general symptoms for colon cancer, but these symptoms also occur in many other diseases.

Blood in the stools is a common sign of many intestinal cancers. It may appear red if it is fresh or black if it is old. It should be reported to a doctor immediately, even though it is often caused by conditions other than cancer, including:

Hemorrhoids
Minor tears around the rectal or anal areas
Diverticulosis

In addition, stool can change color by:

Eating certain red foods, such as beets or red licorice (red)
Taking iron supplements and medications that have bismuth subsalicylate, most commonly Pepto-Bismol (black)

Nevertheless, blood in the stools is an abnormal finding that should never be ignored. Always report it to your doctor for further advice.

Symptoms of colorectal cancer vary widely depending on the location of the cancer within the large intestine.

Tumors in the Cecum and Ascending Colon (Right Colon). The waste matter in the first portion of the colon is in liquid or semi-liquid form. Tumors that develop here do not change bowel habits or stool formation, but they may cause intermittent or chronic bleeding. Although the stools look normal, patients may develop symptoms of anemia from iron deficiency. Such symptoms include weakness, fatigue, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, and exercise intolerance.

Tumors in the Transverse Colon. As waste material passes across the upper quadrants of the abdomen (the transverse colon), the intestine absorbs water, and the waste matter becomes more solid. In addition to bleeding, tumors here may cause cramps, gas, partial or complete obstruction, and even perforation of the bowel. Anemia can also occur.

Tumors in the Descending Colon and Rectum (Left Colon). When tumors partially block the lower intestine, thin, pencil-shaped stools may form. Bowel habits can change. Tumors in the rectum and lowest part of the intestine can cause pain and a feeling of fullness. Defecation may be painful, or patients may feel the urge to defecate but nothing happens. Bleeding from these locations may be brisk and bright red or maroon, but cancer is often detected before symptoms of chronic anemia develop.

Risk Factors

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S., with Americans facing a lifetime chance of 5.5 - 6% for this cancer. In 2007, colorectal cancer was expected to cause 153,760 new cases and 52,180 deaths in the United States. About 73% of cancers occur in the colon and 27% in the rectum.

The lifetime risk of cancer of the colon or rectum is 5.9% for men and 5.5% for women.

Colorectal cancer risk increases with age. More than 90% of these cancers occur in people over age 50. The rate of colorectal cancer in patients under 20 years is less than 1 in 100,000 per year. At age 50 about 1 in 2,000 people per year will develop colorectal cancer. After age 65, this rate increases to almost 3 in 1,000.

African-Americans have the highest risk of being diagnosed with, and dying from, colorectal cancer. Among Caucasians, Jews of Eastern European (Ashkenazi) descent have an elevated rate of colorectal cancer. Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, Hispanics/Latinos, and American Indians/Alaska Natives have a lower risk than Caucasians.

About 20 - 25% of colorectal cancers occur among people with a family history of the disease. (Seventy-five percent of cases are due to other causes.) People who have more than one first-degree relative (sibling or parent) with the disease are especially at high risk. The risk is even higher if the relative was diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 60.

About 5 - 10% of patients with colorectal cancer have an inherited genetic abnormality that causes the disease. Genetic mutations associated with colorectal cancer include familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

The risks for colon cancer are far higher in industrialized nations than less developed countries. A Western lifestyle, being sedentary, smoking, and having excess weight have all been associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer. (However, about 75% of cases occur without a known predisposing factor.)

Dietary Factors. Eating a lot of red meat increases the risk for colorectal cancer. Other types of animal protein (low-fat dairy products, fish, poultry) may decrease the risk of developing polyps and colorectal cancer. Studies on fruits, vegetables, and fiber are mixed. Some evidence suggests that diets very low in fruits and vegetables may increase the risk. In any case, eating a variety of fruits and vegetables should be part of a healthy diet.

A 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested that diet may play a role in colorectal cancer recurrence, as well as prevention. The study evaluated patients with stage III colon cancer who had been treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Patients who ate diets high in red and processed meats, refined grains, and sweets had a higher risk of cancer recurrence and poorer survival than patients whose diets were high in fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish.

Alcohol and Smoking. Alcohol use and smoking increase the risk for colorectal cancer. Patients who smoke and drink may also be diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a younger age than non-drinkers and non-smokers. Several studies suggest that women who smoke are at especially high risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Obesity. There is a demonstrated link between body mass and colon cancer risk for both men and women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that the risk of colon cancer rises as body mass index increases. Obesity has been associated biologically with higher circulating levels of insulin and a hormone called insulin-like growth factor. Chronically high levels of these substances may increase colorectal cancer risk.

Physical Inactivity. More than 50 studies from around the world suggest that physical activity helps prevent colon cancer. In contrast, exercise does not protect against rectal cancer.

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic afflictions of the large intestine known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Both have been linked to increased risk for colorectal cancer. (Patients with ulcerative colitis have a higher risk than those with Crohn's disease.) Family histories are helpful in determining risk associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Some studies suggest the following:

Patients with IBD who have a family history of colorectal cancer face up to a five-fold risk of colon cancer themselves.
Individuals without IBD who have relatives who suffered from both IBD and colorectal cancer may face a higher risk for developing colorectal cancer themselves.
Individuals without IBD but with a family history of IBD and no colon cancer most likely face no higher risk for cancer themselves.

Crohn's disease, also called regional enteritis, is a chronic inflammation of the intestines that is usually confined to the terminal portion of the small intestine, the ileum. Ulcerative colitis is a similar inflammation of the colon, or large intestine. These and other inflammatory bowel diseases have been linked with an increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Polyps. Polyps are tissue growths, usually benign, that develop in the color or rectum, most often in patients over 50 years of age. When pathologists examine polyps removed from the colon, they classify them as either hyperplastic or adenomatous. Both types are benign, but some adenomas will become malignant. As a preventive measure, polyps should be removed (polypectomy).

Ureterosigmoidostomy. People who have had ureterosigmoidostomy, a surgical procedure to correct a birth defect in the bladder or to treat some bladder cancers, may develop tumors near the site of the defect, which is chronically exposed to urine and feces. Such patients have a 5 - 10% chance of developing colon cancer 15 - 30 years after the operation.

Diabetes. Many studies have identified an association between type 2 diabetes and colon cancer. Both diseases share common risk factors of obesity and physical inactivity, but diabetes itself is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Both men and women who have diabetes are at risk.

Heart Disease. Coronary artery disease (CAD) increases the risk for colorectal cancer. Both CAD and colorectal cancer share important risk factors, including smoking, high fat diet, sedentary lifestyle, and obesity.

Dietary Factors

Some, but not all, studies have suggested that a high intake of fruits and vegetables can lower the risk for colorectal cancer. One study, for example, reported that these foods do not prevent polyps from forming but may help prevent them from becoming cancerous.

Phytochemicals. Many studies have demonstrated the cancer-fighting effects of plant chemicals called phytochemicals. Fruits and vegetables that contain phytochemicals can often be identified by colors:

Dark green (broccoli, spinach, kale, collard greens, mustard greens). These vegetables contain chemicals called isothiocyanates, which have been associated with a lower risk for cancer in general.
Red (red pepper, tomatoes, watermelon, raspberries, pink grapefruit). Lycopene is a chemical found in these foods that may have strong cancer-protective properties. Cooking tomatoes appears to increase their benefits.
Yellow-orange (carrots, pumpkin, sweet potatoes, oranges, tangerines). The colors in these foods are due to carotenoids. Carotenoids have been associated with health protection, although they may not have much effect on colon cancer itself.
Blue-black (many berries). Dark berries appear to have potent antioxidant chemicals that may be protective against cancer.

Organosulfurs are important food chemicals that are part of the allium family. Studies have reported health benefits from foods containing them. These compounds are found in garlic, leeks, onions, chives, scallions, and shallots. A review of 300 studies concluded that people who eat raw or cooked garlic regularly experience about two-thirds the risk of colorectal cancer as people who eat little or none. Another analysis, however, found the available evidence about garlic to be inconclusive. Garlic supplements, in any case, do not appear to be protective.

Fiber. Studies have been mixed on whether fiber (found in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains) protects the colon from cancer. For example, three major studies in 2002 and 2003 reported no difference in the development of colorectal polyps or cancer recurrence with high intake of fiber. On the other hand, results of the 2003 European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) -- the largest study ever conducted on the role of diet in the development of cancer -- suggested that fiber is protective regardless of its source. However, in the study, the greatest benefits were observed for the left side of the colon and the least for the rectum. In any case, fiber, which is only found in plant products, may be beneficial for the heart and have other health advantages.

The role of fats in inflammatory bowel disease is complex and not fully known. A 2006 study from the Women’s Health Initiative found that a low-fat diet did not help reduce the risk for colorectal cancer. However, the study did not distinguish between types of fat.

Monounsaturated fats (olive, peanut, canola oils; avocados, nuts) and omega-3 polyunsaturated fats (fish, flaxseed oil, walnuts) are the healthiest types of fats.
Saturated fats (red meat, butter, high-fat dairy products) and trans-fats (hydrogenated fat found in snack foods, fried foods, commercial baked goods) are unhealthy types of fats.

Dietary guidelines recommend that adults limit the total fat in their diet to 25 - 35% of total daily calories. Saturated fat intake should be less than 7%, and trans fats less than 1%, of total daily calories. (Patients with heart disease or diabetes may need to limit unhealthy fat in their diet even further.) Most fats should come from polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat sources.

[See In-Depth Report #43: Heart healthy diet; and #42: Diabetes diet.]

Evidence strongly suggests that red meat raises the risk for colon cancer development, and perhaps also recurrence. Red meat contains dietary iron, which has been associated with a higher risk for colon cancer.

High-temperature cooking (grilling, broiling, or pan-frying) has been specifically associated with increased risk for colon polyps and colon cancer. Overcooking meat increases the amount of carcinogens called heterocyclic amines, which has been associated with cancerous changes.

Milk, Lactose, and Probiotics. In one study, adults who drank the most milk had the lowest risk for colon cancer. A 2004 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute supported this conclusion. In this review of 10 epidemiologic studies that included more than 500,000 people, those who consumed more milk and calcium had a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer. Milk contains not only calcium but also other compounds, such as lactose, that may help protect against colon cancer.

Yogurt specifically has been associated with a lower risk for colon cancer if it contains live active bacterial cultures, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, that are called probiotics. These "friendly bacteria" appear to protect the colon from cancerous changes. (Acidophilus and other probiotic capsules are also available in health food stores.)

Calcium. Calcium, which is found in dairy products, is associated with colon cancer protection. Many studies have shown a possible protective effect from either high-calcium diets or calcium supplements. However, a 2006 study from the Women’s Health Initiative found that calcium and vitamin D supplements do not reduce women’s colorectal cancer risk. Many doctors still recommend that postmenopausal women take these supplements for bone health.

Obesity has been associated with colon cancer. In some studies of people under 67 years old, the amounts of fat and protein were less important than the total number of calories consumed: the higher the energy intake, the greater the risk for developing colon cancer. In older adults, high calorie intake did not make any significant difference. Other studies have indicated that eating too much sugar may increase the risk for colon cancer.

Studies conducted in several countries have found that drinking four or more cups of coffee a day is associated with a lower risk for colorectal cancer. Green tea may have also beneficial properties, but more research is needed in both of these areas.

Folate and B Vitamins. For years, many doctors have believed that the B vitamin folate (called folic acid) may help protect against colorectal cancer, particularly for people who are genetically predisposed to this disease. Folate is found in beans, citrus fruits, and green vegetables, but some studies have indicated that the greatest protective benefits come from taking supplements.

However, an important study published in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association challenged this assumption. The study suggested that high-dose folic acid supplements do not prevent colorectal cancer, and may actually increase the risk for developing certain types of colorectal tumors. The study evaluated over 1,000 men and women who had a recent history of non-cancerous colorectal polyps. (Adenomatous polyps, also called colorectal ademomas, are the most common type of polyp found in colorectal cancer screenings.) The results indicated that patients who took 1 mg/day of folic acid supplements were more likely to develop new adenomatous polyps than patients who did not take supplements. Patients in the folic acid supplement group were also more likely to have advanced adenomas and more numerous adenomas.

Adenomatous polyps are benign tumors, but they can potentially develop into cancerous tumors. Researchers are continuing to investigate the role that folic acid plays in colorectal cancer risk and prevention. It is possible that folic acid may help prevent the initial appearance of adenomatous polyps, but increase the risk for additional polyp formation once they have begun to occur.

Antioxidant Supplements. Antioxidants are chemicals that help eliminate harmful particles called oxygen-free radicals that have been associated with cancerous changes. Some studies have associated supplements of the antioxidants selenium and vitamins A, C, D, and E with lower colon cancer risk, but most studies have found no protective effect.

Prevention

Studies indicate that daily exercise is one of the best ways to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. The more vigorous the activity, the greater the benefit, but even moderate exercise (walking, stair-climbing) can help reduce colorectal cancer risk. The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that people engage in at least moderate exercise for 30 minutes or more at least 5 days a week. The ACS also notes that 45 minutes or more of moderate-to-vigorous activity at least 5 days a week may help further reduce cancer risk.

Some studies also suggest that regular exercise may be beneficial for patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Two 2006 studies indicated that exercise may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and death for patients with stage I - III cancer.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are very common pain relievers that are available over-the-counter and by prescription. They include aspirin, ibuprofen (Motrin), naproxen (Aleve), and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex). Several studies have reported that NSAIDs help reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. However, regular use of NSAIDs, even in low doses, can increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and stomach ulcers. Long-term use of NSAIDs can also increase the risk for heart attack and stroke, especially in people who have a history of heart disease. Several 2006 and 2007 studies in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that celecoxib prevented precancerous polyps, but the drug more than doubled patients’ risk for heart attack and other cardiovascular events.

A 2005 Nurse’s Health Study found that aspirin, but not other NSAIDs, does provide protection against colorectal cancer. However, the risk was only reduced for women who took 2 aspirin a day for more than 10 years. In addition, this dose level greatly increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Furthermore, a 2007 study in the New England Journal of Medicine suggested that aspirin’s protective effects may only apply to some types of colorectal cancer tumors. Another 2007 study, published in the Lancet, indicated that long-term daily use of aspirin can protect against polyps and colorectal cancer, but experts agree that aspirin’s risks do not outweigh its benefits for most people. (Some people who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer may benefit from aspirin therapy.)

In March 2007, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against the routine use of aspirin and other NSAIDs to prevent colorectal cancer in people at average risk for this disease. (This recommendation does not apply to people who have a family history of colorectal cancer or who are at high risk for developing colorectal cancer due to other risk factors.) Long-term use of NSAIDs can increase the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney function problems, and heart problems. Aspirin can also increase the risk for hemorrhagic stroke. Due to these risks, the American Cancer Society and other professional associations also recommend against the use of NSAIDs or other types of medications for colorectal cancer prevention.

Medications containing 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) are sometimes given to patients with ulcerative colitis to help control inflammation. These drugs, which include sulfasalazine and mesalamine, are chemically related to aspirin. A 2005 review of clinical trials found that patients with ulcerative colitis who used 5-ASA were 49% less likely to develop colorectal cancer than patients who did not use these drugs

Some studies have suggested that cholesterol-lowering statin drugs may help reduce colorectal cancer risk. A 2006 study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute did not find any protective benefit for statins.

Estrogen has been associated with a lower risk for colon cancer, perhaps because of specific enzymes that prevent cell proliferation. Drugs containing estrogen, then, may help high-risk women:

There is some evidence that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces the risk of colon cancer in postmenopausal women. It carries other risks, however, including a higher risk for breast and uterine cancer and blood clots. A 2004 New England Journal of Medicine study found that while short-term use of estrogen plus progestin reduced the risk of developing colon cancer, combination HRT users who were diagnosed with the disease had more advanced forms of the cancer. Older women who are at higher risk for colon cancer might discuss risks and benefits of HRT with their doctor.
Oral contraceptives may reduce younger women's risk of colon cancer. Duration of use does not seem to be associated with decreased risk, but protection appears stronger for women who have more recently used oral contraceptives.

Diagnosis

Colon and rectal cancers are diagnosed using the screening tests discussed below. These tests can detect precancerous polyps and colorectal cancers at stages early enough for complete removal and cure.

Unfortunately, only 30 - 40% of adults over 50 years old (mostly in the upper socioeconomic group) have regular screening tests that could detect a cancer early enough for curative treatment. A survey reported that many people are not screened because they are too embarrassed. Those who had already had the tests were willing to have them again if they saved one additional day of their lives.

There is some debate about what is the best screening method. Current screening guidelines offer several different options for patients. Doctors agree that not enough people are screened and that these tests, if adopted with the same regularity as such screening tests as Pap smears, would save many lives. It is especially important for anyone at increased risk or with symptoms, such as rectal bleeding or ulcerative colitis, to have testing at an earlier age.

There is also debate about when people should stop being screened. A 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that screening provides little benefit for elderly people, especially because colorectal cancers grow very slowly. The researchers suggest that doctors should carefully consider the risks versus benefits of screening patients age 80 and older.

Individuals should discuss with their doctors the risks and benefits of all screening procedures. Some controversy exists over how often people without risk factors for cancer should be screened and which detection method should be used for them.

Guidelines for Adults Age 50 and Over with Average Risk. The following are the five screening options recommended for people age 50 and over who have no symptoms and no family history of colon cancer:

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) every year
Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
FOBT or FIT every year plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
Double-contrast barium enema every 5 years
Colonoscopy every 10 years

Choosing between Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy. The choice between colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for routine screening for older adults with average risk is an area of intense debate. The issues are as follows:

Sigmoidoscopy is less costly, less invasive, quicker, and safer than colonoscopy. Although it allows inspection of only the left side of the colon, any abnormal findings from sigmoidoscopy trigger a full colonoscopy. Therefore, experts estimate that sigmoidoscopy can detect 80% of all significant problems.
Colonoscopy is more sensitive than any other current screening method for detecting colon cancer. It can find 75 - 90% of colorectal cancers. If the goal were to reduce the number of cancer cases, regardless of cost, colonoscopy would be the preferred approach. Colonoscopy, however, is more expensive than sigmoidoscopy and has a slightly higher risk for complications (bowel tears or bleeding when a polyp is removed).

There are 3 basic tests for colon cancer: a stool test (to check for blood), sigmoidoscopy (inspection of the lower colon), and colonoscopy (inspection of the entire colon). All 3 are effective in catching cancers in the early stages, when treatment is most beneficial.

Screening, particularly with colonoscopy, in increased- and high-risk populations can save lives. The most important risk factors are a family history of colorectal cancer and personal history of colorectal cancer, polyps, or chronic inflammatory bowel disease. People with these risk factors should be screened before age 50 and may need more frequent screenings.

Guidelines for Increased-Risk Groups. Anyone with first-degree relatives diagnosed with colon cancer younger than 60, or with two relatives who have been diagnosed with colon cancer at any age, should consider beginning the standard screening regimen with a colonoscopy every 5 years, beginning at age 40 or 10 years before the youngest case in the family (whichever is earlier).

Men of African descent are also considered to be at increased risk for colon cancer and should discuss similar screening guidelines with their doctors.

Guidelines for High-Risk Groups. The following guidelines may be useful for specific high-risk groups.

People who have the mutated hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene (MSH2 or MLH-). Frequent colonoscopy (for instance, every 1 - 2 years) beginning in their early 20s. (Regular screening for other cancers, such as uterine cancer, is also reasonable.)
People who have the mutated familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) gene. Frequent screening with endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) beginning in early puberty. Genetic testing is now recommended for family members of people with known FAP.
People with predisposing intestinal problems, such as widespread and active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Annual screening with colonoscopy with biopsies of suspicious areas.

Guidelines for Follow-Up After Detection of Precancerous Polyps. Patients who have had a previous examination in which polyps were detected (and removed) should have a repeat colonoscopy 1 - 3 years later, depending on the size, number, and type of polyps removed.

The digital rectal examination is used to detect tumors in the rectum, lower intestine, and prostate gland. The doctor inserts a lubricated-gloved finger into the patient's rectum and feels for lumps or other abnormalities. The exam is quick and painless but embarrassing for some. Fewer than 10% of colon cancers develop within the region that can be evaluated by a DRE, so it is not useful as a sole screening test.

Blood in bowel movements is not always visible, in which case it is called occult (hidden) blood. Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are used to detect this hidden blood. The most common FOBT method is called the guaiac-based test. The patient is asked to supply up to six stool specimens in a specially prepared package. A small quantity of feces is smeared on specially treated paper, which reacts to hydrogen peroxide. If blood is present, the paper turns blue.

Accuracy. FOBTs can miss more than 75% of advanced cancers. Nevertheless, large studies have indicated that this simple test, performed annually, saves lives and may reduce the risk of dying from colon cancer by 15 - 33%. The following factors may affect its accuracy:

The levels of iron in the blood can affect results. Patients should not take iron supplements or eat red meats several days before the test.
Certain raw fruits and vegetables that contain the chemical peroxidase (cauliflower, horseradish, radishes, melons, and turnips) can cause a positive test reaction even if no blood is present.
Aspirin and NSAIDs are anticoagulants that can cause minor bleeding. They should not be taken for a week before the test. However, a 2005 study suggested that the prescription anticoagulant warfarin does not affect FOBT results.
Vitamin C and foods rich in this vitamin may cause a false negative reaction and should be avoided a few days before the test.
Bleeding from other causes, such as menstruation, hemorrhoids, gingivitis, or urinary infections, can produce blood in the stools and affect results.

Even if none of these conditions is present, a test that shows hidden blood does not necessarily mean that cancer is present. About 20 - 30% of people with occult blood have noncancerous polyps or other conditions, such as gastritis, and only 5 - 10% actually have cancer. Any abnormal result, however, requires further testing, such as colonoscopy.

Lack of Compliance. Compliance is a major problem. Patients are asked to perform the tests at home and send the test cards to the laboratory. Only 35 - 50% of patients actually follow through. Occult-blood tests that give results at home are available but are extremely inaccurate. In one large study, these tests failed to detect advanced cancer in about 62% of cases, although they may detect some early cancers.

If a digital rectal exam (DRE) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) shows signs of trouble, several methods to visualize the colon are available. They include colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema. They have the following similarities and differences:

Sigmoidoscopy can only view the rectum and the left side of the colon, while colonoscopy and barium enemas allow a view of the entire large intestine.
Both flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy involve snaking a fiber optic tube through regions of the rectum and colon to view the walls of the intestine. The tube contains a tiny camera that transmits the image to a video screen. The use of an ultrasound (sound wave) scanner is proving to enhance viewing quality. Barium enemas simply use x-rays.
During either sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, the doctor is able to remove polyps or other abnormalities revealed by these procedures with surgical instruments inserted through the tube. It is not possible to remove polyps with a barium enema, which is not invasive.

Sigmoidoscopy. Sigmoidoscopy examines the rectum and the lower two feet of the colon. It cannot, however, detect the roughly half of cancers that occur in the right colon. Right-sided cancers are more common in older people.

The procedure uses a flexible fiber optic tube (it is thus referred to as flexible sigmoidoscopy) that contains a tiny camera and surgical instruments.
It lasts about 10 minutes and may be mildly uncomfortable, but it is not painful and is generally very safe. In one study, 70% of patients reported that the procedure was far less unpleasant than they had expected.

This procedure has been found to reduce the risk of fatal cancers in the rectal and sigmoid area by 60%. If polyps are detected, a colonoscopy is then used.

Colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is the most accurate testing method and can reduce cancer incidence by up to 90%. It is clearly indicated for anyone with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, including those with a personal or family history of the disease. As with sigmoidoscopy, a colonoscopy uses a flexible tube, but it is snaked through the entire large intestine.

For about a day before the procedure the patient eats nothing and drinks a laxative solution that cleans out the colon. The taste of the solution is unpleasant, although it has improved in recent years.
The procedure typically uses a sedative that produces a "twilight" sleep and often makes the procedure more comfortable than sigmoidoscopy.
Air may be introduced into the intestine to widen it and allow the tube to navigate curves. A colonoscopy avoids the risk of radiation associated with a barium enema, but it is important to note that even a colonoscopy does not detect all cancers.

Complications are rare, but include the following:

Hyponatremia. Hyponatremia is a low concentration of sodium in the blood. The complication may be caused by the effects of bowel cleaning before the procedure that can result in water retention and reductions in sodium. When severe, it can cause temporary neurological symptoms, such as confusion, lethargy, unsteadiness, and slurred speech. Researchers suggest that sodium concentrations be measured in patients who develop such symptoms after colonoscopy.
Bowel perforation (very low risk, about 2 in 1,000 procedures). The risk for bowel perforation is greater with colonoscopy than flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Bleeding at the site of biopsy or polyp removal.

Overall, colonoscopy is a safe procedure. However, according to a 2006 study in the Annals of Internal Medicine, serious complications occur in about 5 of every 1,000 colonoscopies. Most of these complications occurred when a biopsy or polyp removal was performed. (The risk for complications without biopsy or polyp removal is about 1 in every 1,000 colonoscopies.) This study looked at colonoscopies in general, including those that are done to diagnose the causes of a patient's symptoms. The risk may be lower for colonoscopies performed solely to screen for colorectal cancer.

Barium Enema. The double-contrast barium enema, which uses an x-ray image, is the less expensive alternative for viewing the entire colon. It is not as accurate as colonoscopy, and if any polyps or abnormalities are revealed on x-ray, a colonoscopy is then required to remove suspicious tissue, so it is now recommended much less often than in the past.

The barium enema is a valuable diagnostic tool that helps detect abnormalities in the large intestine (colon). The barium enema, along with colonoscopy, remains the standard in the diagnosis of colon cancer, ulcerative colitis, and other diseases of the colon.

Screening for familial adenomatous polyposis. Genetic screening for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is now available and may be recommended for high-risk patients. The test for FAP detects a mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli in up to 90% of people who carry it. Testing for HNPCC mutation is somewhat more complex.

Screening for insulin-like growth factor. A gene that regulates insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) is functional during fetal development and then becomes inactive. Some evidence now suggests that people who have IGF-2 in adulthood have a higher risk for colon cancer. Blood tests for detecting IGF-2, then, may be helpful in identifying patients who should have more intensive screening. Currently, however, this is only used as a research tool.

Stool DNA Testing. A promising technique for colorectal cancer screening is the detection of altered DNA in cancer cells that have shed from the colon and are excreted in the stool. Such tests may prove to detect both inherited and noninherited genetic mutations. This may become a widely used tool in the future. However, larger clinical studies are needed.

Virtual Colonoscopy. A promising experimental technique called virtual colonoscopy allows three-dimensional imaging of the colon without using invasive instruments. As with standard colonoscopy, the patient takes a laxative first to clear out the intestine. The procedure itself involves pumping air into the colon and scanning the intestine using computed tomography (CT). It is very safe and takes about only 10 minutes. The procedure is similar in accuracy to conventional colonoscopy for detection of larger polyps (6 mm or more in diameter) and is also potentially less expensive. Colonoscopy is required, however, if suspicious areas are found, which may occur frequently with the CT procedure, since it erroneously identifies a high number of nonexistent polyps.

A study published in April 2004 in the Journal of the American Medical Association compared results of standard colonoscopy versus virtual colonoscopy in over 600 patients at nine major medical centers. Virtual colonoscopy had much lower rates of successfully finding polyps than standard colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy detected polyps of at least 6 mm in 39% of patients and polyps of at least 10 mm in 55% of patients. By contrast, standard colonoscopy detected 99% of polyps of at least 6 mm, and 100% of polyps of at least 10 mm. In addition, accuracy rates varied widely among the different hospitals. The authors advised that until more improvement in training and technique is achieved, virtual colonoscopy "is not yet ready for widespread clinical application."

Magnetic Resonance Colonography. Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) is another non-invasive technique for visualizing the colon. The patient receives an enema containing a contrast substance, and then magnetic resonance images are taken. MRC is fast, comfortable, and less invasive than colonoscopy. Currently, however, there is a poor detection rate for flat tumors and for polyp tumors less than 10 mm in diameter.

Staging

A diagnosis of cancer will lead to staging and other tests to help determine the outlook and the appropriate treatments.

The large intestine is a long hollow organ lined with mucous membrane (mucosa). Muscle layers wrap around the entire length and help move food material through to the rectum.

Unlike many other cancers, the size of the tumor is not a major factor in determining the outcome of colorectal cancer. Of greater importance is how far the cancer has spread. To determine this, doctors will assign a stage to the tumor. There are several methods for staging. The older system, known as Dukes', categorizes four basic stages: A, B, C, and D. A more recent system refers to these stages as I, II, III, and IV but divides the categories slightly differently. The term "5-year survival" means that patients have lived at least 5 years since diagnosis. Most patients who live 5 years without a recurrence are considered to be cured of their disease.


Stage	Condition	5-Year Survival
A or I	Tumor superficially involves the inner lining of the intestine.	More than 90%
B or II	Tumor has penetrated through the muscle wall of the intestine but has not reached the lymph nodes.	70 - 85%
C or III	Lymph nodes are involved.	65% or below
D or IV	Tumor has spread to other organs (metastasized), usually the liver first.	5 - 9%

Click the icon to see an image of the stages of cancer.

Researchers are continually seeking to identify tumor markers, substances (usually found in blood samples) that will assist in the diagnosis of cancer and in monitoring effects of treatment.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen. High blood levels of a protein called carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) sometimes indicate the presence of colon cancer. Unfortunately, it is also elevated in other cancers and in some noncancerous conditions. CEA is not effective as a screening tool for healthy people, but might eventually be helpful for patients with cancer.

An advanced diagnostic technique called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can detect genetic evidence of CEA. One study indicated that when these microscopic footprints of colon cancer are detected in the lymph nodes of patients with Stage II cancer (whose lymph nodes otherwise appear to be not involved with cancer), the outlook is similar to that of patients with Stage III cancer. Patients without this so-called micrometastasis have a very favorable prognosis. Further research is needed, however, before PCR can be used in widespread practice.
In patients with a history of, or active, colon cancer, follow-up measuring of blood CEA levels may be helpful in detecting recurrence of the cancer and effectiveness of treatments.

Defective P53 Gene. The presence of a defective p53 gene is a marker for very poor prognosis in patients with advanced colon cancer. In its normal state, the gene is important for regulation of cell growth. Testing for this abnormality, however, is not widely done because it is not clear how to use this information.

Other Tumor Markers. Other tumor markers under investigation include a protein called GLUT1, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) RNA, HER-2/neu oncoprotein, transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta-1), and CD44.

Click the icon to see an image of drawing blood for culture.

A technique known as a sentinel node biopsy is increasingly performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients. This procedure is used to determine if cancer has spread beyond the nodes, possibly reducing the need for complete axillary lymphadenectomies. It involves the following:

The procedure uses an injection of a tiny amount of a tracer, either a radioactively-labeled substance (radioisotope) or a blue dye, into the tumor site.
The tracer or dye then flows via the lymphatic system into the so-called sentinel node. This is the first lymph node to which any cancer would spread.
The sentinel lymph node and possibly one or two others are then removed.
If they do not show any signs of cancer, it is highly likely that the remainder of the lymph nodes will be cancer free, and further surgery becomes unnecessary.

It is still not known if the sentinel node biopsy has any survival advantages compared to the standard procedures with lymph nodes removal. However, one study indicated that careful and complete removal of potentially cancerous lymph nodes is still very important for improving survival in patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Whole-body imaging scans that combine positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) may be helpful in accurately staging colorectal cancer, according to preliminary research published in 2006 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Prognosis

Survival rates for colorectal cancer have been rising in recent years. The 5-year survival rate is as high as 90% for cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes (localized cancer). When cancer has spread to lymph nodes and other parts of the body, survival rates drop to 65% and below. Because many cancers are detected at later stages, the overall survival rate is currently about 60%. African-Americans and other minorities tend to have lower survival rates than Caucasians. Studies suggest, however, these higher mortality rates are largely due to less access to optimal health care, including appropriate surgical care and aggressive treatments.

In most cases, age is not a factor in treatment success. Good survival rates are achieved in the elderly as well as in young people. Chances for survival are less in Stage II cancers if the intestine is obstructed or perforated. If cancer has spread to lymph nodes (Stage III), the outlook is better if three or fewer lymph nodes are involved. Treatment can prolong life even when cancer has spread.

Surgery

Surgical removal of the tumor ("resection") along with any affected surrounding tissue is the standard initial treatment for potentially curable colorectal cancers (cancers that have not spread beyond the colon or lymph nodes). Drug and radiation therapy are often used for advanced cancers and are continuously being tested with surgery in different combinations and sequences.

Although choosing a qualified surgeon is critical, choosing a hospital experienced in procedures is also important. The more often colon cancer surgery is performed at a given hospital, the lower the mortality rate at that hospital is likely to be.

Unless cancer is very advanced, most tumors are removed by an operation known as colectomy:

Colectomy involves removing the cancerous part of the colon and nearby lymph nodes.
The surgeon then reconnects the intestine.
If the surgeon cannot reconnect the intestine, usually because of infection or obstruction, the surgeon will perform a colostomy. The need for colostomies is higher after surgery for rectal cancer. In most cases of colon cancer, colostomies are not needed. [See "Colostomy" below.]

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing colon cancer treatment.

The Surgical Approach. The standard technique for a colectomy is open, invasive surgery. Laparoscopy, sometimes called “keyhole surgery,” is a less invasive method. Laparoscopy is still considered an investigational technique for treating colon cancer, but it is gaining more acceptance and showing good results in clinical trials.

Open Surgery:

Open surgery uses a wide incision to open the patient's abdomen. The surgeon then performs the procedures with standard surgical instruments. This is the usual method for performing colectomy.

Laparoscopy:

Laparoscopy uses a few small incisions through which the surgeon passes a fiber optic tube (laparoscope) containing a small camera or tiny instruments. It is generally used for early colon cancer (for tumors less than 2 centimeters or for well-defined tumors less than 3 centimeters).
A 2004 New England Journal of Medicine study found that patients who received laparoscopic colectomy had similar rates of surgical complications, cancer recurrence, and survival as those who received traditional open surgery. However, the patients who had laparoscopy recovered faster and did not need as many narcotic painkillers.
Several 2005 studies indicated that laparoscopy works as well as conventional surgery for treatment of colon cancer. However, laparoscopy does not appear to be as effective for rectal cancer.

Click the icon to see an image detailing pelvic laparoscopy.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a resection of the large intestine.

Other Investigational Measures. Researchers are testing expandable metal tube-like devices called stents to keep the intestine open. Stents may be used before a procedure to allow bowel cleansing or for long-term use to keep open colons that can't be operated on.

A colostomy is performed in order to bypass or remove the lower colon and rectum. The procedure generally involves creating a passage, called a stoma, through the abdominal wall that is connected to the colon. The feces pass through this passage and are eliminated. Patients must learn how to care for the stoma and keep the area sanitary.

A colostomy usually will have one opening (single-barreled), or there may be two loops opening through the skin (double-barreled).

Usually the colostomy is temporary and can be reversed by a second operation after about 3 - 6 months. It the rectum and sphincter muscles in the rectum need to be removed, the colostomy is permanent. Permanent colostomies are more common when the cancerous regions are within 2 - 3 centimeters of the anus. Fortunately, surgical advances and knowledge of the extent of safe margins are reducing the need for permanent colostomies.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a colostomy procedure.

Managing Permanent Colostomies. In cases where the colostomy is permanent, the patient must wear a colostomy pouch, which sticks to the skin using a special glue. Pouches are available as one- or two-piece systems. The one-piece system is simpler, but the two piece system allows replacement of the pouch without removing the tape.

For best results, the pouch should be emptied when about one-third full. It should be replaced 1 - 2 times a week, depending on signs of leakage (itching or burning of the skin near the stoma). The pouches are odor proof.

Surgical treatments for cancer in the rectum are complex since they involve muscles and tissue that are critical for urinary and sexual function.

Local Excision or Polypectomy for Early Stages. In order to preserve the function of the anal sphincter and prevent the need for colostomy, Stage I and Stage II tumors may be removed by local excision, sometimes followed by chemotherapy and radiation. In this procedure, the tumor is cut out without removal of a major section of rectum. In some cases cancer recurs, but a second operation may be possible. Another treatment for early-stage rectal cancer, called electrocoagulation, destroys tumors using a high frequency electric current. It is being tested in clinical trials.

Radical Resection. In about a third of cases of rectal cancer, the cancer occurs in the lower part of the rectum, where between 70 - 80% of cancers have spread beyond the rectal wall. These patients need a radical resection, in which surrounding structures, including the sphincter muscles that control bowel movements, must often be removed.

The use of chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgery may prevent the need for permanent colostomy in some patients. This is an active area of clinical research, and trials are under way to address this issue. Another technique, called coloanal anastomosis, reconstructs the area to avoid the need for colostomy, and may be appropriate in some patients.

Total Mesorectal Excision. Total mesorectal excision (TME) involves dissection and removal of the entire cancerous area of the rectum along with surrounding fatty regions where the lymph nodes are located (the mesorectum). When successful, TME preserves the sphincter muscle, reducing the need for a permanent colostomy. Increasing use of this procedure is resulting in lower recurrence rates, lower levels of impotence and incontinence, and better overall survival rates compared to other resection techniques. Some experts now recommend it as a first choice for certain patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Combining chemotherapy and radiation either before or after TME is yielding promising long-term results and a low risk for local recurrence. There are many questions, however, and it is not clear which approach is better for specific patients.

Side effects of colon surgery include:

Sexual dysfunction. This is of particular concern. In general, colostomy does not usually affect sexual function. However, wide rectal surgery can cause short- or long-term sexual dysfunction. Sildenafil (Viagra) may help men who experience this after surgery.
Irregular bowel movements.
Gas and flatulence. Pouching filters are available to reduce gas. Certain foods produce more gas than others -- usually within 6 - 8 hours after ingestion for colostomy patients. They include beans, oat bran, most fruit, and certain vegetables (cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and asparagus). To prevent swallowing air, patients should avoid sipping through straws, chewing gum, and chewing with their mouths open.
Diarrhea.
Bladder complications.
Sense of urinary urgency.
Fecal incontinence. Patients with rectal surgery have a higher risk for bowel dysfunction than those who had a colostomy.
Complications in or around the stoma. These can occur early after surgery to many years after the procedure. They include skin infection or breakdown, hernias, narrowing of the stoma, bleeding, and collapse.

There are no dietary restrictions, although many patients avoid foods that can produce gas. Everyone should drink plenty of fluids and get sufficient fiber.

The potential side effects of sexual and bowel dysfunction for colorectal surgical patients can be devastating, although many patients do very well and live normal productive lives. Positive emotions play a strong role in recovery. Patients who are depressed should discuss with a doctor all aspects of treatment that affect the quality of life, and consider seeking support groups.

Medications

Chemotherapy uses drugs that kill cancer cells throughout the body. There are two situations in which chemotherapy is used:

The adjuvant setting. Adjuvant refers to the use of chemotherapy after surgery in patients with Stage III tumors and selected patients with high-risk Stage II tumors (disease that is potentially curable). The goal of this therapy is to eliminate any cancer cells that surgery may have missed, thereby preventing recurrence and increasing the chance of cure. Patients of all ages, including the elderly, can benefit.
In metastatic disease. In patients with metastatic disease (where the cancer has spread to other parts of the body) the goal of chemotherapy is to shrink tumors, improve symptoms and quality of life, and lengthen life.

In the adjuvant setting, there are some differences in chemotherapy treatments between colon and rectal cancers:

Chemotherapy for Stage II is considered standard care for Stage II rectal cancer but is under debate for colon cancer.
Chemotherapy is standard for patients with Stage III colon cancer. Chemotherapy is also standard for patients with Stage III rectal cancer but is used in combination with radiation.

Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II colon cancer is controversial. Such patients tend to have a good outcome after surgery, and the positive effects of chemotherapy have been difficult to demonstrate. To date, the survival advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy in this group has been reported to be only in the range of 2%. However, better trials are still needed to confirm or refute the benefits in specific patient groups.

Although not yet known with certainty, some data suggest that certain patients with Stage II cancer may be at higher risk of recurrence and would theoretically benefit from adjuvant therapy. These include patients with cancers that have:

Obstructed the bowel
Perforated the wall of the colon
Adhered to structures outside the intestine

Advanced diagnostic techniques are under investigation for helping to select appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapy. None of these methods, however, are ready to be used routinely to help make treatment decisions. The decision whether to pursue chemotherapy for Stage II disease should be made after careful discussion between the patient and their oncologist, especially after features, such as bowel perforation or obstruction, are taken into account.

Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer. Since the early 1990s, adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin has been the standard of care for Stage III colon cancer. In recent years, the FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) regimen has also been used for chemotherapy following surgery. Numerous trials have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting reduces the absolute risk of death from colon cancer by about one-third and improves survival by 10%. Clinical trials are also investigating combinations of other drugs.

Chemotherapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Chemotherapy is either given directly into the arteries of the liver or intravenously (through a vein) with 5-FU and leucovorin. Oxaliplatin is sometimes added, but recent evidence suggests that the targeted therapy biologic drug bevacizumab may be a better addition. Other alternative chemotherapy choices are capecitabine, or irinotecan combined with cetuximab. Radiation therapy may be used in place of chemotherapy or in combination with it. Studies indicate that chemotherapy offers only a modest improvement in survival, but may help reduce symptoms.

Seven drugs are currently approved for colorectal cancer chemotherapy:

5-fluorouracil (5-FU, Adrucil), which is often given in combination with leucovorin (Wellcovorin). Leucovorin is a vitamin that helps boost the effectiveness of 5-FU.
Capecitabine (Xeloda)
Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)
Irinotecan (Camptosar)
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Cetuximab (Erbitux)
Panitumumab (Vectibix)

Capecitabine is a pill form of 5-FU. The other drugs are administered intravenously. Many of these drugs are given in combination with each other. Common chemotherapy combination regimens include:

5-FU / LV (5-FU and leucovorin)
FOLFOX (5-FU with leucovorin and oxaliplatin)
FOLFORI (5-FU with leucovorin and irinotecan)
IFL (Irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin)
XELOX (Capecitabine and oxaliplatin)

Side effects occur with all chemotherapeutic drugs. They are more severe with higher doses and increase over the course of treatment. Because cancer cells grow and divide rapidly, anticancer drugs work by killing fast-growing cells. This means that healthy cells that multiply quickly can also be affected. The fast-growing normal cells most likely to be affected are blood cells forming in the bone marrow, and cells in the digestive tract, reproductive system, and hair follicles. Nausea and vomiting is a very common side effect, but drugs such as ondansetron (Zofran) can help provide relief. In general, side effects are nearly always temporary, and medications can help manage them. Most patients are able to continue with normal activities for all but perhaps 1 - 2 days a month.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) with Leucovorin. Adjuvant therapy using 5-fluorouracil, either alone or with leucovorin (5-FU/LV), is the standard treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer (Stage III or select patients with Stage II tumors). Leucovorin, also called folinic acid, is a form of the B vitamin folic acid, which helps increase 5-FU’s effectiveness. Patients are given a series of cycles that usually continue for at least 6 months.

There are many different ways of giving 5-FU, including intravenously over several hours once a week, intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days every month, or as continuous infusion with a portable pump.

The side effects can be quite different, depending on the way 5-FU is given, and women may be more susceptible than men. In one analysis, 53% of women and 40% of men experienced severe side effects, while response rates and survival were similar for both sexes. Many patients, however, tolerate 5-FU with leucovorin well, with manageable side effects. The most common side effects include nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, loss of appetite, hair loss, swelling of hands and feet, rashes, and mouth sores.

Irinotecan. Irinotecan (Camptosar) blocks an enzyme essential for cell division. Irinotecan can be given alone or in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin. This combination therapy (irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV) is also referred to as the "Salz regimen," or IFL. When it was approved in the mid 1990s, irinotecan was the first new drug developed for colon cancer in over 30 years. Studies have shown that irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly delays the time at which tumors progress and improves survival in metastatic cancer compared to 5-FU/LV alone. While the survival advantage is small, the combination has become the standard of care for metastatic cancer. Of concern, however, are studies that have reported an increased risk of death from toxic effects with the use of the three-drug combination. These deaths appeared to be related to blood-clotting complications. Doctors should carefully monitor dosages. Diarrhea is a common side effect of irinotecan.

Capecitabine. Capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral form of 5-FU, was approved in 2001 as a treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. It is the only pill approved for colorectal cancer. A major 2005 study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that capecitabine works as well as the standard 5-FU/LV regimen and causes significantly fewer side effects. The study involved patients with Stage III colon cancer who had undergone surgical removal of the tumor. In 2005, capecitabine was approved for postsurgical treatment of patients with Dukes’ C colon cancer. Capecitabine is also showing promise in combination with radiation therapy for rectal cancers.

Oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is related to cisplatin, a widely used platinum-based chemotherapy drug. Oxaliplatin is used in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin. (This triple combination therapy is called the FOLFOX regimen.) Oxaliplatin was first approved in 2002 for use in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin as a second-line treatment for cancer that has progressed after initial therapy.

Since 2002, oxaliplatin has received additional approvals as a first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and as a post-surgical treatment for patients who have undergone tumor resection.

Oxaliplatin can cause pain and tingling sensations in the hands and feet (neuropathy) that is worsened by exposure to cold. Recent research suggests that adding xaliproden (Xaprila) to the FOLFOX regimen may help reduce the frequency of neuropathy without interfering with the benefits of chemotherapy. Xaliproden is a drug used to treat the neurological disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease).

Bevacizumab. Bevacizumab (Avastin) was approved in February 2004 as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (advanced cancer that has spread in the body). It is used in combination with IFL (irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin). Bevacizumab is a genetically engineered monoclonal antibody that targets and inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that regulates angiogenesis (the development of new blood vessels that feed a tumor's blood supply). It is the first anti-angiogenic therapy approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

In a study of 800 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, bevacizumab administered intravenously along with IFL extended survival by about 5 months longer than IFL alone. Common side effects of bevacizumab include nosebleeds, fatigue, diarrhea, and high blood pressure. Less common side effects include stroke, heart attacks, angina, and formation of holes in the colon and stomach (gastrointestinal perforation).

Cetuximab. Cetuximab (Erbitux) was approved in February 2004 for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This monoclonal antibody drug targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a protein required by cancer cells in order to proliferate. It can be used either in combination with irinotecan or alone for patients who have not responded to irinotecan. Studies of the cetuximab-irinotecan combination suggest it can help in tumor shrinkage. It has a modest effect on survival, prolonging patients’ lives by about an additional month.

Panitumumab. Panitumumab (Vectibix) was approved in September 2006 for treatment of colorectal cancer that has metastasized following standard chemotherapy. Like cetuximab, panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody drug that targets EGFR. In clinical trials, panitumumab helped delay disease progression and prolong survival by about 3 months. About 8% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage. Common side effects of this drug include skin rash, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea or constipation. Serious side effects include pulmonary fibrosis, severe skin rash, and skin reactions at the infusion site.

One of the most promising recent developments in cancer treatment research has been the emergence of so-called "targeted therapies." Traditional chemotherapy drugs can be effective, but because they do not distinguish between healthy and cancerous cells their generalized toxicity can cause severe side effects. Targeted therapies work on a molecular level by blocking specific mechanisms associated with cancer cell growth and division. Because they selectively target cancerous cells, they may induce less severe side effects. In addition, these drugs hold the promise of creating options for more individualized cancer treatment based on a patient's genotype. In the future, diagnostic tests may help doctors identify which patients are more likely to respond successfully to specific drugs.

Biologic therapies use the body's immune system to attack the cancer (immunotherapy). These drugs are derived from biological sources and include vaccines, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), and gene therapies. Many targeted therapies are classified as biologics. Bevacizumab (Avastin), cetixumab (Erbitux), and panitumumab (Vectibix) are currently the three biologic drugs approved for colorectal cancer treatment, but many other drugs are in development.

Targeted therapies involve many different types of drugs and molecular pathways. These include:

Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Anti-angiogenesis drugs inhibit the formation of new blood vessels that supply tumors with the blood, oxygen, and nutrients vital to tumor growth. Angiogenesis inhibitors, such as the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin), target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Cediranib (Recentin), formerly AZD2171, is a new angiogenesis inhibitor that is in Phase III clinical trials for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Tumor Growth Factor Inhibitors. Tumor growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, stimulate cell growth. Cetixumab (Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vectibix) are the two currently approved colorectal cancer drugs that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Nimotuzumab (TheraCIM) is currently being studied in combination with irinotecan in Phase III trials.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Tyrosine kinase is an enzyme associated with EGFR that is involved with the signaling mechanisms that prompt cell growth. The EGFR/tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib (Tarceva), which is approved for the treatment of pancreatic and lung cancers, is being investigated as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Sunitinib (Sutent), which is approved for renal cell carcinoma, is another tyrosine kinase inhibitor in Phase III trials for colorectal cancer.

Radiation Treatment

Radiation therapy uses x-rays to kill cancer cells that might remain after an operation or to shrink large tumors before an operation so that they can be removed surgically. The object of radiation therapy is to damage the tumor as much as possible without harming surrounding tissues. Radiation may be administered in the following ways:

Externally by an x-ray machine (external beam radiation).
By passing radioactive pellets through thin plastic tubes inserted into the intestine.
By implanting tiny radiation seeds directly into the tumor (brachytherapy).
Computer imaging techniques providing 3-dimensional pictures of the cancerous area are allowing precise targeting of radiation to the tumor.

Postoperative radiation treatment combined with chemotherapy is common practice for patients with rectal cancer in Stages II and III. Such patients are at risk of recurrence both at the site of their original tumor and elsewhere in the body. Although there can be significant long-term side effects, the combination of 5-FU and radiation is still considered standard after surgery.

The standard procedure in the U.S. is to apply radiation after surgery (postoperative). Pre-operative chemotherapy and radiation, however, are sometimes used to preserve sphincter-muscle function and reduce the chance that a patient will need a colostomy. Furthermore, some studies suggest that the use of radiation before surgery reduces the likelihood of recurrences and may slightly prolong survival in some patients with rectal cancer. (It has no additional advantages, however, if the subsequent surgery does not completely remove the cancerous regions.) Studies comparing preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy and radiation are currently under way.

Radiation therapy can also be used during surgery (a procedure called intra-operative radiotherapy). It allows the surgeon to move healthy tissue out of the path of the radiation beam.

Short-term side effects of radiation include:

Diarrhea
Skin irritation around the anus
Incontinence
Fatigue
Bowel movement problems

Longer-term complications may include:

Incontinence
Hip and pelvic fractures
Diarrhea
Increased risk for bowel obstruction

Follow-up Testing

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) sets guidelines for follow-up testing to detect recurring cancer after the completion of treatment. The following guidelines are based on ASCO’s 2005 updated recommendations.

Most colorectal cancer recurrences happen within 3 years after surgery. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that a colorectal cancer patient sees their doctor for a physical examination every 3 - 6 months for the first 3 years, every 6 months for the fourth and fifth years, and at the doctor's and patient's discretion during subsequent years.

Patients should have a colonoscopy 3 years after surgery. If the results are normal, patients should then receive a colonoscopy every 5 years. Some patients with hereditary types of colorectal cancer may need more frequent screenings.

A flexible sigmoidoscopy is recommended every 6 months for 5 years for patients with Stage II or III rectal cancer who did not receive radiation therapy.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels should be measured every 3 months after surgery for 3 years in patients with Stage II or III cancer. High CEA levels in the blood may indicate that the cancer has spread to other parts of the body.

Patients at high risk for cancer recurrence should receive an annual computerized tomography (CT) scan for the first 3 years after treatment. The CT scan can help determine if cancer has spread to the lungs or liver. Patients who have had rectal cancer, and did not have radiation therapy, should receive a pelvic CT scan. The scan is not recommended for most lower-risk patients with Stage I or II colorectal cancer.

American Society of Clinical Oncology does not recommend other follow-up blood tests such as complete blood count, liver function tests, fecal occult blood tests. There appears to be no additional benefit for these tests.

Treatment for Metastasized Colorectal Cancer

The liver is the most frequent site for colorectal cancers to spread (metastasized). Here, treatments may slow the spread of cancer and even prolong survival. Cure is very rare.

When cancer has spread, surgery to remove or bypass obstructions in the intestine may be performed. In these circumstances, surgery is considered palliative in that it may improve symptoms but will not lead to cure. In rare cases, metastatic colon cancer may be cured with surgical removal of tumors in areas to which the cancer has spread, such as the liver, ovaries, and lung. The liver is the most common site of spread. Only selected patients may be eligible for such surgery, but in these patients, 5-year survival has been 25% or higher.

Chemotherapy may help improve symptoms and possibly prolong survival in metastasized colorectal cancers. Several investigational drugs are being tested. Doctors are also testing chemotherapy administered directly into the liver -- a treatment called hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). A 2006 study found that hepatic arterial infusion improves survival and quality of life for patients whose cancer has spread to the liver. The study indicated that HAI works better for these patients than chemotherapy delivered intravenously.

Other investigative techniques used to destroy liver tumors include:

Cryosurgery. This approach freezes the tumor or surrounding tissue.
Embolization. Embolization employs a catheter to deliver substances into the liver that block blood vessels and therefore starve the tumor. Chemotherapy is often administered during this procedure.
Radiation.

For end-stage cancer, hospice care is a compassionate option.

Resources

www.cancer.org -- American Cancer Society
www.cancer.gov -- National Cancer Institute
www.oncolink.org -- OncoLink cancer information
www.asco.org -- American Society of Clinical Oncology
www.plwc.org -- People Living with Cancer
www.nccn.org -- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials -- Find clinical trials

References

Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2131-42.

Cole BF, Baron JA, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Ahnen DJ, Bresalier RS, et al. Folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2351-9.

Flossmann E, Rothwell PM; British Doctors Aspirin Trial and the UK-TIA AspirinTrial. Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidencefrom randomised and observational studies. Lancet. 2007 May 12;369(9573):1603-13.

Kerr DJ, Dunn JA, Langman MJ, Smith JL, Midgley RS, Stanley A, et al. Rofecoxib and cardiovascular adverse events in adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):360-9.

Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Shapiro JA, Schulman J. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 19;145(12):880-6.

Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Hu FB, Mayer RJ, et al. Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):754-64.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Routine aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the primary prevention of colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):361-4.

Veit-Haibach P, Kuehle CA, Beyer T, Stergar H, Kuehl H, Schmidt J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2590-600.

Review Date:
9/8/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com

Cirrhosis

FitSugar — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:35:41 -0700

In This Report

Highlights
Introduction
Causes
Risk Factors
Symptoms
Complications
Diagnosis
Treatment
Lifestyle Changes
Abdominal Infections
Encephalopathy
Ascites
Bleeding Episodes
Resources
References

HEALTH GUIDE REFERENCE FROM A.D.A.M

Highlights

Drug Approval

In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration approved HepaGram B, an injectable immune globulin that can help prevent recurrence of hepatitis B following liver transplantation.

Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis is an autoimmune liver disease that increases the risk for liver cancer. According to a 2007 study, specific risk factors may help predict which patients with primary biliary cirrhosis are at particularly high risk of developing liver cancer. These risk factors include older age, being male, history of blood transfusion, and any signs of portal hypertension (high pressure of the blood in the portal vein, which leads to the liver) or cirrhosis.

Hepatitis C and Cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis who are infected with a particular hepatitis C genotype (1b) have a high risk of developing liver cancer, indicates a 2007 study. These patients should receive regular monitoring so that liver cancer can be detected in its earliest stages.
Interferon drug therapy can help reduce -- but not entirely eliminate -- the risk of liver cancer developing in patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis.

Hemochromatosis

Hemochromatosis, also called “iron overload,” is an iron disorder that increases the risk for cirrhosis. Hereditary hemochromatosis is one of the most common genetic diseases in the United States, and experts have debated whether all people should get screened for it. In 2006, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated guidelines concerning hemochromatosis screening. The USPSTF does not recommend routine screening in the general population. However, people who have family histories of hemochromatosis, or who show signs or symptoms of this disorder, should get tested.

Encephalopathy

Lactulose, a drug that helps remove ammonia from the body, can help improve cognitive function and quality of life for people with hepatic encephalopathy, suggests a 2007 study. Hepatic encephalopathy, a complication of liver disease, affects the brain and nervous system.

Introduction

Cirrhosis is an irreversible result of various disorders that damage liver cells over time. Eventually, damage becomes so extensive that the normal structure of the liver is distorted and its function is impaired.

Cirrhosis is a chronic liver disease that causes damage to liver tissue, scarring of the liver (fibrosis - nodular regeneration), progressive decrease in liver function, excessive fluid in the abdomen (ascites), bleeding disorders (coagulopathy), increased pressure in the blood vessels (portal hypertension), and brain function disorders (hepatic encephalopathy). Excessive alcohol use is the leading cause of cirrhosis.

The disease process often takes the following path:

Scarring. The main damage in cirrhosis is triggered by scarring (fibrosis) that occurs from injuries due to alcohol, viruses, or other assaults. Normal clumps and form nodules around the scarred areas. The scar tissue and regenerated nodules act like small dams and alter the flow of blood and bile in and out of the liver.

Altered Blood and Bile Flow. The changes in blood and bile flow have significant consequences, with both the liver and other organs responding to the altered flow:

The spleen overproduces nitric oxide, a gas that causes blood vessels in the spleen to relax and open.
The small blood vessels and bile ducts in the liver itself, however, narrow (constrict). (Blood vessels in other organs, including the kidney, also narrow.)
Blood flow coming from the intestine into the liver is slowed by the narrow blood vessels. It backs up through the portal vein and seeks other routes.
New, abnormally twisted and swollen veins called varices form in the stomach and lower part of the esophagus in order to compensate for the backup blood.
Bile also builds up in the bloodstream, resulting in high levels of bilirubin, which causes a yellowish cast in the skin called jaundice.
Fluid buildup also occurs in the abdomen (called ascites), and swelling in the arms and legs is common.

Changes in Liver Size. The liver enlarges in the first phases of the disease. In advanced stages, the liver sometimes shrinks, a condition called postnecrotic cirrhosis.

The liver is the largest organ in the body. In the healthy adult, it weighs about 3 pounds. The liver is wedge-shaped, with the top part wider than the bottom. It is located immediately below the diaphragm and occupies the entire upper right quadrant of the abdomen.

Vital Functions. The liver performs over 500 vital functions. Damage to the liver can impair these and many other processes. Among them are the following:

Processing Healthful Nutrients. It processes all of the nutrients the body requires, including proteins, glucose, vitamins, and fats.

Bile Production. The liver produces bile, a green-colored fluid that helps the body absorb fats and fat-soluble vitamins. Bile is formed from bilirubin, a yellow-green pigment produced from the breakdown of hemoglobin, the oxygen-carrying component in red blood cells. Bile contains bile salts, fatty acids, cholesterol, and other substances. Bile travels from the liver to the gallbladder, where it is stored until after a meal. It is then secreted into the intestines where it helps digest fat.

Eliminating Toxins. One of the liver's major functions is to render harmless potentially toxic substances, including alcohol, ammonia, nicotine, drugs, and harmful by-products of digestion.

Recycling Blood. The liver and spleen removes old red blood cells from the blood. The iron contained in them is recycled in the bone marrow to make new red blood cells.

The Liver's Architecture. The vital processes the liver performs rely on well-organized liver architecture.

The Building Blocks. The basic building blocks of the liver are the following structures:

Bile ducts
Blood vessels
Working liver tissue (called the parenchyma)
Supportive (connective) tissue

The Architecture. The liver is a built on a framework of lobes:

The lobes. The liver is divided into two major lobes, a right and a smaller left, that are separated by tough, fibrous connective tissue.
The lobules. The liver's two major lobes contain about 100,000 smaller lobes, called lobules. Each lobule contains microscopic columns of liver cells and blood vessels. Bracing the corners of each lobule column are an artery and a vein that carry blood and a bile duct that drains bile.
The arteries and veins. The arteries bring oxygen-rich blood to nourish the liver cells. The veins supply the liver cells with blood containing the nutrients and toxins that the liver cells process. A central vein runs through each column and collects the processed blood from both sources. These veins join to form the hepatic vein.
The bile ducts. The bile ducts in the column corners collect bile draining from tiny canals around the liver cells. These ducts eventually join to form the large common bile duct that leads from the liver to the gallbladder.

The Liver's Blood Supply. The liver is rich in blood. It holds about a pint, or 13% of the body's supply. It is furnished with blood from two large vessels, the hepatic artery and the portal vein, and is drained of blood by the hepatic vein. (The word "hepatic" derives from the Latin word for liver.)

The hepatic artery. This artery supplies blood from the heart directly to the liver. This blood nourishes the liver.

The portal vein. The portal vein carries to the liver blood that has been circulating through the stomach, spleen, and intestine. The liver processes this blood, extracting nutrients and toxins.

The hepatic vein. This vein carries blood from the liver and connects to the inferior vena cava, a large vein that carries blood back to the heart.

Click the icon to see an image of the liver.

Causes

Several processes can lead to cirrhosis.

Alcoholism particularly endangers the liver. Alcoholic cirrhosis (also sometimes referred to as portal, Laennec's, nutritional, or micronodular cirrhosis) is the primary cause of cirrhosis in the U.S. It is estimated to be responsible for 44% of deaths from cirrhosis in North America. Some experts believe this estimate is low. One Canadian study found alcohol to be the major contributor in 80% of all cirrhosis deaths.

The relationship between alcohol and cirrhosis is generally as follows:

Alcohol is absorbed from the small intestine, and the blood carries it directly into the liver, where it becomes the preferred energy source.
In the liver, alcohol converts to toxic chemicals, such as acetaldehyde (AcH), which trigger the production of powerful immune factors called cytokines. These molecules in large amounts can cause inflammation and tissue injury. They are proving to be major culprits in the destructive process in the liver. AcH is particularly being researched because it plays a role in most actions of alcohol, including damaging effects on the liver that may lead to cirrhosis.
The injured liver eventually is unable to break down fatty acids, compounds that make up fat. Over time, then, fat accumulates, further impairing the liver's ability to absorb oxygen and increasing its susceptibility to injury. During the initial phase, the fat-laden liver becomes greatly enlarged, but it eventually shrinks as cirrhosis develops.

Chronic hepatitis, both hepatitis B and hepatitis C, is the second leading cause of cirrhosis. Chronic hepatitis C is the more dangerous form and accounts for one-third of all cirrhosis cases. About 5 - 20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C, and 5 - 10% of patients with chronic hepatitis B, eventually develop cirrhosis over the course of several decades. The longer a patient has had chronic hepatitis, the greater the risk for eventually developing cirrhosis. A 2005 study indicated that cirrhosis develops in 70% of patients who have had hepatitis C for more than 60 years.

The hepatitis virus can produce inflammation in liver cells, causing injury or destruction. If the condition is severe enough, the cell damage becomes progressive, building a layer of scar tissue over the liver. In advanced cases, as with alcoholic cirrhosis, the liver shrivels in size, a condition called postnecrotic or posthepatic cirrhosis.

Hepatitis C is a virus-caused liver inflammation which may lead to jaundice, fever, and cirrhosis. The people most at risk for contracting and spreading hepatitis C are those who share needles for injecting drugs and health care workers or emergency workers who may be exposed to contaminated blood.

Autoimmune liver diseases include autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis. Like other autoimmune disorders, these conditions most likely develop because a genetically defective immune system attacks the body's own cells and organs. People who have one of these liver diseases also often have other autoimmune conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, scleroderma, inflammatory bowel disease, glomerulonephritis, and hemolytic anemia.

Autoimmune Hepatitis. Autoimmune chronic hepatitis occurs when an abnormal immune response causes an attack on the liver cells. It accounts for about 20% of all chronic hepatitis cases. Autoimmune chronic hepatitis typically occurs in women age 20 - 40 who have other autoimmune diseases. Some research indicates that the postmenopausal period may be another peak in incidence of AIH among women. About 30% of patients are men, however, and in both genders there is often no relationship to another autoimmune disease. In general, no major risk factors have been discovered for this condition.

Suspects for triggering this hepatitis include the measles virus, a hepatitis virus, or the Epstein-Barr virus, which causes mononucleosis. It is also possible that a reaction to a drug or other toxin that affects the liver also triggers an autoimmune response in some people.

Click the icon to see an image of mononucleosis.

Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. Up to 95% of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) cases occur in women, usually around age 50. In people with PBC, the immune system attacks and destroys cells in the liver’s bile ducts. Like many autoimmune disorders, the causes of PBC are unknown. Recent research indicates the following risk factors:

Family history of PBC
Family history of Sjögren syndrome (another autoimmune disorder)
Individual history of urinary tract infections (UTI)
History of smoking
History of nail polish use
Hormone replacement therapy
Exposure to toxins from hazardous waste sites

This research suggests that environmental factors (chemicals, cigarette smoke) or infectious organisms (bacteria that causes UTI) may trigger PBC in patients who are genetically susceptible to the disease. Women who have never been pregnant appear less likely to develop PBC.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) resembles alcoholic liver disease, but it occurs in people who do not drink a lot of alcohol. Obesity and type 2 diabetes are the two main causes of a fatty liver. Some evidence suggests that insulin resistance (the primary problem in type 2 diabetes) is a major factor in development of a fatty liver. A diet high in fatty foods may also be a risk factor, as dietary fat accumulates in the liver. Due to the recent rise in childhood obesity, NAFLD is increasingly occurring in children. In fact, NAFLD is now the most common liver disease in American children.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease can lead to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver inflammation and injury, as well as a fatty liver, characterize NASH. NASH occurs in about half of people with diabetes and up to 75% of obese people.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is usually benign and very slowly progressive. But, in certain patients it can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, or liver cancer. About 8 - 20% of people with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis go on to develop cirrhosis. A 2006 study indicated that NASH-related cirrhosis causes fewer deaths than cirrhosis that is caused by chronic hepatitis C. However, many patients with NASH have coronary artery disease and heart failure and have a high risk of dying from heart disease.

Weight reduction and diabetes and cholesterol management are the primary approaches to controlling these diseases.

Hemochromatosis is a disorder of iron metabolism. This disease interferes with the way the body normally gets rid of iron. People with hemochromatosis absorb too much more iron from the food that they eat. The iron overload accumulates in organs in the body. When excess iron deposits accumulate in the liver, they can cause cirrhosis.

There are two main forms of hemochromatosis:

Primary hemochromatosis, also called hereditary hemochromatosis, is an inherited genetic disease.
Secondary hemochromatosis results from other conditions, such as anemia and alcoholism.

Hereditary hemochromatosis is one of the most common genetic diseases, especially among Caucasians. About 1 in every 200 Americans carries the gene that causes this disease. Although experts do not recommend that everyone get screened for hemochromatosis, people who have a family history of this disease, or who show symptoms (joint pain, fatigue, abdominal pain), should get tested. Left untreated, hemochromatosis can lead to serious damage of the liver, heart, and pancreas.

Hemochromatosis is treated with phlebotomy, a procedure that involves removing about a pint of blood once or twice a week. Starting phlebotomy treatment before organ damage occurs can help prevent cirrhosis. If, however, cirrhosis has already developed, patients have a high risk for developing liver cancer even if iron levels are normalized.

Inherited Diseases. Cirrhosis can be caused by several inherited diseases, including:

Cystic fibrosis
Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
Galactosemia
Glycogen storage diseases
Wilson's disease

Other Rare Causes. Rare causes of cirrhosis include:

Schistosomiasis, caused by a parasite found in the Far East, Africa, and South America.
Small intestine bypass surgery (rarely, if ever, performed anymore).
Long-term or high level exposure to certain chemicals and drugs can cause cirrhosis, including arsenic, methotrexate, and toxic doses of vitamin A.

Cancers that have metastasized to the liver, blood clots in the hepatic or portal vein, or obstructions in the bile duct can cause changes that resemble cirrhosis.

Risk Factors

Cirrhosis affects about 3 million Americans a year. However, because about 2.7 - 4 million people harbor hepatitis C, the rates of cirrhosis could dramatically increase over the next few years.

Only 10% of heavy drinkers develop advanced liver disease. Not eating when drinking and consuming a variety of alcoholic beverages are factors that increase the risk for liver damage. Still, the amount of alcohol consumed and the patterns of drinking are only weak predictions of risk. Other risk factors have been identified that may increase the danger to the liver:

Obesity is a major factor for all stages of liver disease.
Women develop liver disease at lower quantities of alcohol intake than men. The reason for this may be due to women's inability to metabolize alcohol as quickly as men, so it stays in the bloodstream longer.
Genetic factors that regulate the immune responses in the intestine also play a role in increasing the risk for liver injury from alcoholism.

Risk Factors for Developing Cirrhosis from Hepatitis C. Overall, between 10 - 15% of patients with chronic hepatitis C develop cirrhosis. The risk varies widely, however. The following conditions put people with hepatitis C at higher risk for liver damage:

Overall the risk for progression is highest in men -- particularly African-Americans -- who were older at the time of infection. The risk is much lower in women and children (2 - 4%).
Moderate-to-heavy alcohol users. (Even one or two alcoholic drinks a day increase the risk for liver injury in hepatitis C patients.)
Having a specific genetic type of the virus. There are six main genetic types and more than 90 subtypes, which can differ significantly in their effects and response to treatment. Genotype 1 is the most serious and is the cause of up to three quarters of the cases in the U.S. The other common forms are types 2 (15%) and 3 (7%), which pose less danger.
Co-infection with hepatitis B. Co-infection with B significantly affects the outcome of these patients and may be more common than previously believed. This co-condition may cause superinfections with very serious consequences, reduce these patients' responses to interferon therapy, and increase their risk of liver cancer. Patients with hepatitis C should be immunized against hepatitis B.
Co-infection with HIV.
A history of transfusions. (In one report, the risk in middle-aged patients with a history of transfusions was 20 - 30%).
Being diabetic and overweight, particularly if fat is distributed in the abdomen (an apple-shape). This condition poses a higher risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH), which in turn is apt to become scarred and cirrhotic.

Weight gain in the area of and above the waist (apple type) is more dangerous than weight gained around the hips and flank area (pear type). Fat cells in the upper body have different qualities than those found in hips and thighs.

Having large iron stores in the liver.
High exposure to toxic chemicals or environmental contaminants.

Because there are millions of Americans now infected with chronic hepatitis C, doctors have been justifiably concerned that there will be a significant number of cases of liver failure and liver cancer in the coming years. Computer analyses have suggested that mortality rates from hepatitis C-related cirrhosis or liver cancer will double or triple over the next 20 years. Fortunately, improved therapies may significantly reduce these discouraging estimates.

Researchers are working on developing a genetic test to identify patients with chronic hepatitis C who are most at risk of developing cirrhosis. In 2007, scientists announced they had made progress on a test that measures variations in seven genes to calculate a “Cirrhosis Risk Score.” The researchers hope that this experimental test may eventually help doctors decide which patients should receive early treatment with alpha-interferon and ribavirin.

Risk Factors for Developing Cirrhosis from Hepatitis B. The great majority of people with chronic persistent hepatitis B have a good long-term outlook. Between 5 - 10%, however, become carriers of the virus, and 5 - 10% of these individuals eventually develop cirrhosis. The addition of hepatitis D is a particular danger and increases the risk for cirrhosis. Seven genetic types of hepatitis B virus (designated A to G) have now been identified, which may help researchers determine the patients who may have a better outlook than others. Genotype C is the most common form and is more aggressive than genotype B, which also responds better to treatment.

Primary biliary cirrhosis accounts for only 0.6 - 2% of deaths from cirrhosis. In patients with chronic persistent autoimmune hepatitis, the outlook is very favorable, and survival rates are equal to the general population. If it becomes active, it must be treated. Left untreated, the 5-year survival rates of primary biliary cirrhosis are 50%.

Obesity increases the risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a condition that can lead to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Studies estimate that 8 - 20% of people with NASH eventually develop cirrhosis. A 2006 study found that people with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes have a high risk of developing end-stage liver disease. People with NASH had an especially poor prognosis for survival. Losing weight is important for overweight people with NASH and may help to delay disease progression. A 2003 study of more than 11,000 patients indicated that obesity increases the risk of death from cirrhosis in people who drink little or no alcohol, but not among those who drink alcohol.

Symptoms

Many people experience few symptoms at the onset of cirrhosis.

Early symptoms include:

Fatigue and loss of energy.
Loss of appetite and nausea.
Spider angiomas may develop on the skin. These are pinhead-sized red spots from which tiny blood vessels radiate.

Patients in later stages may develop the following symptoms:

Jaundice. This yellowish cast to the skin and eyes occurs because the liver cannot process bilirubin for elimination from the body.

Jaundice is a condition produced when excess amounts of bilirubin circulating in the bloodstream dissolve in the subcutaneous fat (the layer of fat just beneath the skin), causing a yellowish appearance of the skin and the whites of the eyes. With the exception of normal newborn jaundice in the first week of life, all other jaundice indicates overload or damage to the liver, or inability to move bilirubin from the liver through the biliary tract to the gut.

The palms of the hands may be reddish and blotchy, a condition known as palmar erythema.
Loss of body hair.
Abnormalities in hormone-affected organs. In men with alcoholic cirrhosis, the testicles may atrophy, and their breasts may become swollen, sometimes painfully.
Ascites. A swollen belly is a sign of ascites, the most common major complication of cirrhosis, which occurs when fluid accumulates in the abdomen. Fever, abdominal pain, and tenderness when the belly is pressed indicate that the fluid is infected, but infection can occur without any symptoms.
Fluid buildup and swelling (edema) in legs.

People with primary biliary cirrhosis may have severe generalized itching and often develop small fatty yellow lumps called xanthomas on the eyelids, hands, and elbows. They may have an unpleasant condition called steatorrhea, in which the feces contain excessive fat, causing them to float and to be very foul smelling.

Click the icon to see an image of a xanthoma.

Complications

Cirrhosis is the eleventh leading cause of death by disease in the United States, killing more than 25,000 people each year. A damaged liver affects almost every bodily process, including the functions of the digestive, hormonal, and circulatory systems. The most serious complications are those associated with so-called decompensation, which occur when cirrhosis progresses. They include the following:

Bleeding and fluid buildup (ascites).
Infections.
Damage to the brain (encephalopathy). Impaired brain function occurs when the liver cannot detoxify harmful substances.

Liver cancer is also a long-term risk with cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis is irreversible, but the rate of progression can be very slow, depending on its cause and other factors. Five-year survival rates are about 85% and can be lower or higher depending on severity.

For example, alcoholics with cirrhosis who abstain can have a 5-year or more survival rate of as high as 85%. For those who continue drinking, the chance for living beyond 5 years is no higher than 60%.
In patients with hepatitis B or C, the 5-year survival rate after a diagnosis of cirrhosis is 71 - 85%.
About two-thirds of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis never develop symptoms and can have a normal lifespan. Once symptoms of liver damage, such as jaundice, occur, however, the average survival time declines. In one study of women diagnosed with primary biliary cirrhosis, about 36% developed symptoms over an 11-year period, and 11% either died or required liver transplantation.

Unfortunately, doctors are usually unable to determine when cirrhosis first occurred, which makes it difficult to determine prognosis.

In cirrhosis, liver cell damage slows down blood flow. This causes a backup of blood through the portal vein, a condition called portal hypertension. The effects of portal hypertension can be widespread and serious, including fluid buildup and bleeding.

Ascites and Fluid Buildup. Ascites is fluid buildup in the abdomen. It is uncomfortable and can reduce breathing function and urination. Ascites is usually caused by portal hypertension, but it can result from other conditions. Swelling can also occur in the arms, legs, and spleen. Although ascites itself is not fatal, it is a marker for severe progression. Once ascites occurs, only half of patients survive after 2 years. Some doctors refer to the phases of cirrhosis as preascitic and ascitic. Some doctors even believe that ascites signals the need for liver transplantation, particularly in alcoholic cirrhosis.

Variceal Bleeding. One of the most serious repercussions of portal hypertension is the development of varices, blood vessels that enlarge to provide an alternative pathway for blood diverted from the liver. In about two-thirds of patients, they form in esophagus. Varices pose a high risk for rupture and bleeding because of the following characteristics:

They are thin-walled.
They are often twisted.
They are subject to high pressure.
Internal bleeding from these varices (variceal bleeding) occurs in 20 - 30% of patients with cirrhosis. The risk of death from a single episode can reach 70%.

Bleeding commonly recurs within 2 weeks of the first episode, but after 6 weeks, the risk for recurrence is the same as for patients who have not had a bleeding event.

Factors that predict variceal bleeding include:

Ascites
Encephalopathy
Large veins

Factors that can increase the danger for a bleeding episode in high-risk individuals include the following:

Moderate-to-intense exercise
Bacterial infection
Certain times of the day. Eating increases portal pressure, and there is a greater risk for bleeding in the evening. A lesser but still significant risk occurs in the early morning.

It is important for patients to be screened for esophageal varices and treated with preventive beta blockers if they show signs of risk. Between 30 - 40% of patients with cirrhosis have bleeding. The risk of dying from this complication is 20 - 35%. Some doctors recommend that all newly diagnosed patients be screened using endoscopy. Screening should also be considered for all previously diagnosed patients who have not been screened but would benefit from preventive treatments.

Portal hypertension can cause several secondary complications, including kidney failure. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as naproxen, may increase the risk for kidney failure.

Gastrointestinal bleeding can occur from abnormal blood clotting, which can be a result of a combination of complications associated with cirrhosis. They include vitamin K deficiencies and thrombocytopenia -- a drop in platelets (the blood cells that normally initiate the clotting process). Some research now suggests that thrombocytopenia itself may be associated with more advanced liver failure.

Bacterial infections are very common in advanced cirrhosis, and may even increase the risk for bleeding. Most bacterial infections, including those in the urinary, respiratory, or gastrointestinal tracts, develop when patients are in the hospital. Abdominal infections are a particular problem in cirrhosis and occur in up to 25% of patients with cirrhosis within a year of diagnosis.

Mental impairment is a common event in advanced cirrhosis. In severe cases, the disease causes encephalopathy (damage to the brain), with mental symptoms that range from confusion to coma and death. A combination of conditions associated with cirrhosis causes this serious complication:

Buildup in the blood of harmful intestinal toxins, particularly ammonia.
An imbalance of amino acids that affect the central nervous system.

Encephalopathy is often triggered by certain conditions, including:

Gastrointestinal bleeding
Constipation
Excessive dietary protein
Infection
Surgery
Dehydration

Alcoholics with cirrhosis are believed to be at higher risk for this complication than are nonalcoholic cirrhosis, but one study suggested that alcoholics simply tend to have more severe cirrhosis. Even minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) can have detrimental effects on functional ability. One study suggested that MHE impairs the ability to safely drive a car, and that all patients with cirrhosis be tested for MHE.

Symptoms of Encephalopathy. Early symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy include forgetfulness, unresponsiveness, and trouble concentrating. Sudden changes in the patient's mental state, including agitation or confusion, may indicate an emergency condition. Other symptoms include bad fruity-smelling breath and tremor. Late stage symptoms of encephalopathy are stupor and eventually coma.

Hepatorenal syndrome occurs if the kidneys drastically reduce their own blood flow in response to the altered blood flow in the liver. It is a life-threatening complication of late-stage liver disease that occurs in patients with ascites. Symptoms include dark colored urine and a reduction in volume, yellowish skin, abdominal swelling, mental changes (delirium, confusion), jerking or coarse muscle movement, nausea, and vomiting.

People with cirrhosis have an increased risk for liver cancer. Hepatitis B and C themselves increase the risk for liver cancer, regardless of the presence of cirrhosis. Hepatitis B infection is the leading cause of liver cancer.

For hepatitis C-related cirrhosis, a 2007 study indicated that patients with cirrhosis who are infected with genotype 1b hepatitis C have a greater risk of developing liver cancer than patients infected with other types of hepatitis C genotypes. (Genotype 1 is the most common type of hepatitis C in the United States.)

People with primary biliary cirrhosis also face a high risk of liver cancer. According to a 2007 study, several factors can indicate the increased likelihood of developing liver cancer. These factors include older age, male gender, history of blood transfusion, and signs of portal hypertension or cirrhosis.

About 30% of patients with chronic liver disease develop osteoporosis (loss of bone density), which is twice the usual incidence. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis have a particularly high risk for osteoporosis. Treating osteoporosis in patients with cirrhosis can be complicated. One study found that calcitriol (a form of vitamin D) is especially helpful in preventing bone loss in patients with cirrhosis.

Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by progressive loss of bone density, thinning of bone tissue, and increased vulnerability to fractures. Osteoporosis may result from disease, dietary or hormonal deficiency, or advanced age. Regular exercise and vitamin and mineral supplements may reduce and even reverse loss of bone density.

Nearly all patients with cirrhosis are insulin resistant. Insulin resistance is a primary feature in type 2 diabetes and occurs when the body is unable to use insulin. This hormone is important for delivering blood sugar and amino acids into cells and helps determine whether these nutrients will be burned for energy or stored for future use.

One study reported that nearly a quarter of patients with cirrhosis had gallstones.

Click the icon to see an image of gallstones.

They may also face a higher than average risk for certain abnormal heart rhythms. Peptic ulcers, sleep disorders, and respiratory problems are also more common in people with cirrhosis than in the general population.

Diagnosis

A physical examination may reveal the following in a patient with cirrhosis:

The cirrhotic liver is firm and often enlarged. The liver may feel rock-hard. (In advanced stages of cirrhosis, the liver may become small and shriveled.)
The left side can often be felt by the doctor when pressing on the abdomen.

If the abdomen is swollen, the doctor will check for ascites by tapping the flanks and listening for a dull thud and feeling the abdomen for a shifting wave of fluid.

Measuring Liver Enzymes (Aminotransferases). Enzymes known as aminotransferases, including aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT), are released when the liver is damaged. Measurements of these enzymes, particularly ALT, are the least expensive and most noninvasive tests for determining severity of the underlying liver disease and monitoring treatment effectiveness. Enzyme levels vary, however, and are not always an accurate indicator of disease activity. (For example, they are not useful in detecting progression to cirrhosis.)

Radioimmunoassays. To identify a particular virus that may be causing hepatitis, blood tests called radioimmunoassays are performed. Typically, radioimmunoassays identify particular antibodies, which are molecules in the immune system that attack specific antigens. (Antigens are any molecules that the body considers threatening or dangerous, and can be targeted by antibodies.)

An antigen is a substance that can provoke an immune response. Typically antigens are substances not usually found in the body.

Some of these tests can pinpoint hepatitis antigens directly. These tests, however, have limitations:

There may not be enough antibodies for blood tests to detect for up to weeks or months after hepatitis develops. Blood tests that are taken too early, then, may miss these signs of infection.
Antibodies also persist after patients recover, so a positive antibody test can indicate a previous infection but does not necessarily determine if the infection is active.

The assays for individual hepatitis viruses may differ.

Polymerase Chain Reaction. In some cases of hepatitis C, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR), may be performed. A PCR is able to make multiple copies of the genetic material (the RNA) of the virus to the point where it is detectable.

Screening for Hepatitis C Virus. In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against routine screening for the hepatitis C infection in the general population due to low prevalence of the disease. In addition, it "found no evidence that screening for HCV infection in adults at high risk leads to improved long-term health outcomes" and found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against such screening. However, the USPSTF did advise testing in those with signs or symptoms of liver disease. The failure to recommend testing in the high-risk population goes against current recommendations made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and other professional organizations. In response to the study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases issued a statement saying that halting such screening would be a "terrible mistake with grave consequences," pointing out that the study itself underscored some key infection-related data that strongly emphasizes the need for screening in high-risk populations.

A liver biopsy is the only definite method for diagnosing cirrhosis. It also helps determine its cause, treatment possibilities, the extent of damage, and the long-term outlook. For example, hepatitis C patients who show no significant liver scarring when biopsied appear to have a low risk for cirrhosis.

The biopsy may be performed using various approaches, including:

Percutaneous Liver Biopsy. This approach uses a needle inserted through the abdomen to obtain a tissue sample from the liver. Various forms of needles are used, including those that use suction or those that cut out the tissue. If cirrhosis is suspected, a cutting needle is the better tool. This approach should not be used in patients with bleeding problems, and it must be used with caution in patients with ascites or severe obesity.

Click the icon to see an image of liver biopsy.

Transjugular Liver Biopsy. This approach uses a catheter (a thin tube) that is inserted in the jugular vein in the neck and threaded through the hepatic vein (which leads to the liver). A needle is passed through the tube, and a suction device collects liver samples. This procedure is risky but may be used for patients with severe ascites.
Laparoscopy. This procedure requires a small abdominal incision through which the doctor inserts a thin tube that contains small surgical instruments and a tiny camera to view the surface of the liver. This is generally reserved for staging cancer or for ascites with unknown causes.

Biopsies can be dangerous, so they cannot be performed on patients who have test results that indicate clotting problems, on those who have had previous liver biopsies, or who have ascites.

Certain blood tests are used to determine liver function. They include the following:

Serum albumin concentration. Serum albumin measures protein in the blood (low levels indicate poor liver function).
Prothrombin time (PT). The PT test measures in seconds the time it takes for blood clots to form (the longer it takes the greater the risk for bleeding).
Bilirubin. One of the most important factors indicative of liver damage is bilirubin, a red-yellow pigment that is normally metabolized in the liver and then excreted in the urine. In patients with hepatitis, the liver cannot process bilirubin, and blood levels of this substance rise, sometimes causing jaundice.

The results of these tests along with the presence of specific complications (ascites and encephalopathy) are used for calculating the Child-Pugh Classification. This is a staging system (A to C) that helps doctors determine the severity of cirrhosis.

Very high levels of serum alkaline phosphatase, an enzyme produced in the liver, and high levels of immune factors called mitochondrial antibodies are usually present in blood tests of patients with primary biliary blood cirrhosis. Bilirubin measurements appear to be important factors in determining its severity.

Fatty liver is suspected when a patient has elevated liver enzymes. The doctor will take imaging tests of the liver using ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. A liver biopsy is the standard test for confirming a diagnosis of fatty liver disease and for distinguishing NAFLD from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Several studies in 2006 and 2007 suggested that a blood test for cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), a protein found in liver cells, may be an effective noninvasive approach for diagnosing NASH. Doctors hope that this simple blood test may eventually be able to replace liver biopsy.

Several imaging tests can be used to diagnose cirrhosis and its complications.

Imaging Techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound are all imaging techniques that are useful in detecting and defining the extent of cirrhosis. Such tests can reveal ascites, an enlarged spleen, an irregular liver surface, reversed portal vein blood flow, and liver cancer. Sometimes they can even detect abnormally large blood vessels in the liver. In some cases, images from ultrasound and CT can be misinterpreted as cancer. MRI is most useful for ruling out or confirming cancer.

Click the icon to see an image of an MRI scan.

Click the icon to see an image of a CT scan.

Liver Scans. Sometimes liver scans are performed using a small radioactive tracer and a special camera that records information provided by the tracer as it passes through the liver:

Arteriography uses dye injected into the hepatic arteries that show up on x-ray.
Splenoportography uses dye injected into the spleen, which allows the doctor to measure portal vein pressure. This procedure is risky.

Hepatic vein wedge pressure involves insertion of a catheter into the hepatic veins. The blood pressure in the veins of the liver is then measured. The result is an indicator of portal vein pressure. If pressure is high, cirrhosis is likely. A low measurement is a favorable sign.

Endoscopy. Some doctors recommend endoscopy for patients newly diagnosed with mild-to-moderate cirrhosis in order to screen for esophageal varices. (These are abnormal blood vessels in the esophagus that increase the risk for bleeding). In this test, a fiber optic tube is inserted down the throat. The tube contains tiny cameras to view the inside of the esophagus, where varices are most likely to develop. Endoscopy is the only procedure for detecting varices, but it is not clear if screening for varices in patients without severe cirrhosis is any more beneficial than simply putting them immediately on preventive drugs -- whether or not varices have been identified.

Paracentesis. If ascites is present, paracentesis is performed to determine its cause. This procedure involves using a thin needle to withdraw fluid from the abdomen. The fluid is tested for different factors to determine the cause of ascites:

Bacteria cultures and white blood cell counts. (These are used to determine the presence of infection.)
Protein levels. Low levels of protein in the fluid plus a low white blood cell count suggest that cirrhosis is the cause of the ascites.

The appearance of the fluid is helpful in determining problems:

A cloudy fluid plus a high white blood cell count means an infection is present.
Bloody fluid suggests the presence of a tumor.

Screening for Liver Cancer. Patients with cirrhosis are usually screened for liver cancer using ultrasound and tests for a substance called alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). It is not known whether such screening has much impact on survival, because it is not very sensitive and has a high rate of false positives (suggesting the presence of cancer when it is not actually present). Screening is not necessary in patients without cirrhosis.

Treatment

The only treatment for alcoholic cirrhosis is to stop drinking. Individuals with alcoholic cirrhosis are typically malnourished and require increased calories and rigorous nutritional support, which can improve survival rates.

Interferons Alone and in Combination with Ribavirin. Pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin is the gold standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C in both adults and children. It achieves response rates of up to 50% for patients infected with HCV genotype 1 (the most common genotype form in the U.S.) and up to 80% for patients infected with genotypes 2 or 3. Interferon alone is usually reserved for patients who cannot tolerate ribavarin.

A 2005 clinical trial of patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis found that interferon treatment reduced the risk of liver cancer and significantly improved chance of survival. The study emphasizes the importance and substantial benefits of interferon therapy. A 2007 study of patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis also indicated that interferon therapy can help reduce the risk of liver cancer and overall risk of death from liver disease.

A number of natural and synthetic interferons are available:

Natural interferons include interferon alfa-2a (Intron) and interferon alfa-2b (Roferon).
Pegylated interferons (PegINF) are long-acting formulations of interferon. They include alfa-2b (Peg-Intron) or alfa-2a (Pegasys). These drugs are used in combination with ribavarin (Copegus, Rebetol).
Alfacon-1 (Infergen), also called consensus interferon, is a genetically modified interferon. A combination of alfacon-1 with ribavirin is proving to help some patients who had been resistant to ribavirin with interferon.

A 2005 study suggested that some patients with hepatitis C genotypes 2 or 3 may be able to benefit from a shorter course of combination treatment (12 weeks) than the standard 24-week treatment duration. A shorter treatment time may reduce the risk of side effects. However, a 2007 study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that 16 weeks of combination therapy in patients with these genotypes did not work as well as the 24-week regimen. Given the significant side effects associated with combination pegylated interferon and ribavarin treatment, particularly anemia, researchers are actively investigating how to identify which patients may be able to succeed with shorter treatment duration.

PegINF combinations are proving to slow progression of scarring, and have even achieved improvement in some patients who already have cirrhosis. Whether the combination treatment protects against future liver cancer is still unclear. (A higher total dose, rather than a longer duration of treatment, may be the critical factor for protection.)

Side Effects of Combination Treatment. The side effects of the combination include those of both interferon and ribavirin. Interferon side effects may occur more often in the combination treatment. Combination treatment side effects may include:

Anemia occurs in about 22% of patients who take combination treatment versus 1% who take interferon alone. This complication is reversible and usually stabilizes after 1 - 2 months of treatment. However, some patients may become so anemic that they have to stop the medication. Since anemia can worsen heart disease, patients with a history of significant heart problems should not be treated with ribavirin. Other nucleoside analogues are being investigated that may have a lower risk for anemia than ribavirin.
Flu-like symptoms, such as fever, headaches, and muscle aches, are the most common side effect.
Reduced white blood cell count.
Skin disorders, such as dry skin and rash.
Coughing and shortness of breath.
Gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, indigestion, lack of appetite).
Emotional and psychological symptoms, such as severe sleep disturbances, depression, irritability, and anxiety.
Combination treatment in pregnant women poses a very high risk for birth defects.

The current drugs used for hepatitis C still do not meet the needs of all patients. They are expensive, have significant side effects, do not work in half the patients who take them, and are unsuitable in many others. Investigation is ongoing to find better solutions. Drugs showing promise include:

Albinterferon alfa-2b (Albuferon). This long-acting form of interferon-alfa may have fewer side effects and require less dosing than pegylated interferons. It is currently being tested in combination with ribavarin in Phase II trials for patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C.
Thymosin Alpha 1 (Zadaxin), also called thymalfasin, is a synthetic version of a peptide derived from the thymus gland (which is responsible for maturation of immune factors called T-cells). It is being used for hepatitis B and is under investigation for hepatitis C in combination with interferon.
Celgosivir. Celgosivir is a new type of antiviral drug, which blocks alpha-glucosidase, an enzyme involved in viral replication. Celgosivir is being studied in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. The drug is derived from the Australian chestnut tree.
Eltrombopag (Revolade). Thrombocytopenia, reduced production of blood platelets, is a condition that affects patients with hepatitis C and cirrhosis. Patients with thrombocytopenia cannot tolerate standard antiviral therapy. Researchers hope that eltrombopag, a drug that stimulates platelet production, may help normalize platelet levels so that they can start antiviral drug treatment.
Statins. Statin drugs are used for the treatment and management of cholesterol. Researchers are studying whether they may help improve liver enzyme levels in patients with hepatitis C.

Of interest are studies using phlebotomy (which is simply drawing blood) to reduce iron levels. In one study, maintenance therapy with this procedure reduced liver inflammation and possibly slowed progression of cirrhosis.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, and the phrase resoundingly holds true in the case of hepatitis B. Today, a vaccine against hepatitis B is available. It can prevent hepatitis B and, therefore, also prevent liver cancer. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommend that all babies born in the United States receive a hepatitis B vaccine at birth.

Six drugs are currently approved in the United States for treatment of chronic hepatitis B:

Peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys)
Interferon-alfa-2b (Intron)
Adefovir (Hepsera)
Lamivudine (Epivir)
Entecavir (Baraclude)
Telbivudine (Tyzeka)

These drugs block the replication of hepatitis B in the body. Some also help boost the immune system. A doctor will decide which drug to prescribe based on a patient’s age, disease severity, and other factors. Each drug has various advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, efficacy, side effects, and likelihood of drug resistance. A combination of drugs may also be prescribed.

Peginterferon alfa-2a. Peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) was approved in 2005 for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. (Peginterferon is also called pegylated interferon.) The drug was previously approved in 2002 for treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Pegasys prevents the hepatitis B virus from replicating and also helps boost the immune system. It is given as a weekly injection. Peginterferon is sometimes prescribed in combination with lamivudine (Epivir).

Interferon Alpha. For many years, interferon alfa-2b (Intron) was the standard drug for hepatitis B. The drug is usually taken by injection every day for 16 weeks. (It does not appear to help hepatitis D.) Unfortunately, even in hepatitis B, the virus recurs in almost all cases, although this recurring mutation may be weaker than the original strain. Administering the drug for longer periods may produce sustained remission in more patients while still being safe. Interferon is also effective in eligible children, although long-term effects are unclear.

Lamivudine, Entecavir, and Telbivudine. These drugs are classified as nucleoside analogs. Lamivudine (Epivir or 3TC) is an antiretroviral drug that is used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well as hepatitis B. Studies suggest that lamivudine reduces viral count in over half of hepatitis B patients who take it as sole therapy for about a year. It is less expensive than interferon-alfa and has fewer side effects, but may not work as well as interferon-alfa for long-term therapy. A major problem with lamivudine is the development of mutated viral strains that become resistant to the drug, particularly in areas where the virus is common. About 20% of patients who take lamivudine develop drug resistance.

In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved entecavir (Baraclude) for treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B. In clinical trials, entecavir worked better than lamivudine for treating hepatitis B. Entecavir appears to have less risk of drug resistance than lamivudine. Studies also suggest that it may be a good alternative treatment for patients who have developed resistance to lamivudine. Questions have been raised about the drug’s possible cancer risks. Ongoing studies are evaluating this risk.

In 2006, the FDA approved telbivudine (Tyzeka), the newest nucleoside analog drug, for treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Adefovir. Adefovir (Hepsera) belongs to a class of antiviral drugs called nucleotide analogs. (Nucleotides are related to nucleosides but have a slightly different chemical structure.) Nucleotide analogs block an enzyme involved in the replication of viruses. Adefovir costs more than lamivudine, but may be effective against lamivudine-resistant strains of hepatitis B. The drug must be taken on a long-term basis. A 2006 study indicated that when patients stopped taking adefovir after 48 weeks, the hepitatis B virus resumed replication. Patients who took the drug for a longer period (144 weeks) continued to benefit from treatment. Another 2006 study indicated that for some patients, adefovir remains effective for up to 5 years, although resistance occurs in about 20% of patients.

Drug Warnings. In 2004, the FDA issued two drug warnings for patients with hepatitis B. The HIV drug tenofovir (Viread) should not be used to treat patients with HIV who are co-infected with hepatitis Bas the drug may increase hepatitis severity. The lymphoma drug rituximab (Rituxan) may reactivate hepatitis B. Patients with lymphoma should be screened for hepatitis B. In 2007, the FDA revised the label for entecavir (Baraclude); patients who are co-infected with hepatitis Band HIV should take entecavir only if they are also taking antiviral HIV drugs.

Emtricitabine is a nucleoside analog drug used to treat HIV and AIDS. It is being investigated for chronic hepatitis B.
Pegylated interferon alfa-2b (Peg-Intron) and alfa-2a (Pegasys) are approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis C. They are being investigated alone and in combination with other drugs, such as ribavirin (Copegus, Rebetol), for treatment of hepatitis B. The combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin is the standard treatment for hepatitis C.
Thymosin Alpha 1 (Zadaxin), also called thymalfasin, is a synthetic version of a substance derived from the thymus gland (which is responsible for maturation of immune factors called T-cells). It appears to be safe for hepatitis B patients when used alone or in combination with interferon. It is approved in many countries, but not the United States.

Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) and Drugs Used to Slow Progression. At this time no medication can cure primary biliary cirrhosis. Ursodiol, ursodeoxycholic acid (Actigall), or UDCA has been the standard drug used for primary biliary cirrhosis. Several studies have reported that it slows progression and helps prevent the need for liver transplantation.

It has no effect on symptoms, including itching and fatigue. Some drugs, such as colchicine, corticosteroids, or immunosuppressants, are being investigated for use in combination with UDCA. Long-term controlled trials are needed to determine the value of UDCA alone or with other drugs.

Drugs for Itching. Itching is a major problem with this disease. Cholestyramine, taken with meals, is the first choice for relieving itching. Several other drugs have been used or investigated, including low doses of the drug naltrexone and phototherapy.

Drugs for Impaired Fat Absorption. Because primary biliary cirrhosis affects fat absorption, patients may need high doses or injections of important fat-soluble vitamins, including K, D, A, and E.

Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Weight loss is the most important method for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and preventing progression to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and, eventually, cirrhosis. Diabetes and cholesterol control are also important. Investigators are studying whether various drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes may help treat NAFLD and NASH.

Other research is focusing on antioxidant vitamins, such as vitamin E.

In 2005, the National Institutes of Health launched two trials to study treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitisin adults and children. Children with NAFLD will receive vitamin E, metformin, or placebo. In the adult trial, patients with NASH will receive vitamin E, pioglitazone, or placebo.

Secondary Biliary Cirrhosis. Secondary biliary cirrhosis caused by blockage in the bile ducts can be relieved by surgery.

Autoimmune Hepatitis. Autoimmune hepatitis is treated with the corticosteroid prednisone and also sometimes immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine (Imuran).

Hemochromatosis. For hemochromatosis, weekly bleedings (phlebotomies) may be performed until iron levels are normal, then repeated as needed. If treatment is given before cirrhosis develops, life expectancy may be normal.

Wilson's Disease. D-penicillamine is the drug most used for Wilson's disease.

There are no current safe and effective therapies for liver scarring (fibrosis). However, recent insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for scarring have led to the development of specific, antifibrotic drugs that target the primary injury and inhibit abnormal cell mechanisms. Such drugs, now in very early testing, could one day help prevent or reduce the progression of liver scarring or the progression to liver cancer.

Liver transplantation may be indicated for the following:

Patients who have developed life-threatening cirrhosis and who have a life expectancy of more than 12 years.
Patients with liver cancer that has not spread beyond the liver.

Survival rates after transplantation are similar among those who have hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or alcoholic liver disease. Current 5-year survival rates after liver transplantation are about 75%. Patients also report improved quality of life and mental functioning after liver transplantation. Patients should seek medical centers that perform more than 50 transplants per year and produce better-than-average results.

Unfortunately, there are many more patients waiting for liver transplants than there are available organs. Fortunately, more procedures are now being performed using liver tissue from a living donor. In these cases, surgeons replace the patient’s diseased liver with a part of the liver taken from a donor. The donor’s liver regenerates to full size within a few weeks of surgery, and the recipient’s liver also regrows.

Transplantation surgery generally takes 4 - 12 hours to perform, and patients stay in the hospital for up to 3 weeks after the surgery. Most patients return to normal or near-normal activities 6 - 12 months following the transplant. For the rest of their lives, patients need to take immunosuppressive medication to prevent rejection.

Liver Transplantation in Patients with Hepatitis. One of the primary problems with many hepatitis patients is recurrence of the virus after transplantation.

One study of patients with hepatitis C reported 5-year risks of 80% for viral recurrence and 10% for cirrhosis. A 2004 study found that the hepatitis C virus recurs with more severity with liver donations from living donors than livers taken from cadavers.
Viral recurrence is also high in patients with hepatitis B. In 2007, the FDA approved HepaGram B, an immune globulin, to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B after transplantation. Patients need to receive HepaGram B injections on a lifelong basis.

Liver Transplantation in Autoimmune Liver Diseases. Patients who require transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis are those who develop major complications of portal hypertension and liver failure or who have poor quality of life and short survival without the procedure. Survival rates after transplantation are excellent.

The outlook is also good for patients who have autoimmune hepatitis who require a transplant. Survival rates are about 90% after 1 year, and 70 - 80% after 5 years. Rejection usually occurs in those patients whose immune systems are very compromised.

Liver Transplantation in Alcoholism. There is considerable controversy over whether liver transplantation should be performed in alcoholics with cirrhosis who are unlikely to abstain. One French study reported no differences in survival, transplant rejection, and other indicators of success and failure after transplantation between alcoholics and non-alcoholics and between alcoholics who abstained and those who relapsed after the procedure.

Click the icon to see an illustrated series detailing a liver transplant.

Lifestyle Changes

A healthy lifestyle is particularly important for people with cirrhosis.

Healthy Foods. Because important antioxidant vitamins are depleted in the cirrhotic liver, patients should maintain a diet rich in fresh fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.

Coffee and Tea. Coffee appears to help lower the risk of cirrhosis, especially among heavy drinkers. A 2006 study indicated that people who drank 1 - 3 cups of coffee a day reduced their risk of alcoholic cirrhosis by 40%. Those who drank 4 or more cups reduced their risk by 80%. Researchers think that there is some ingredient in coffee (other than caffeine) that is responsible for this apparent protection. Studies on tea have been mixed. Some studies report that tea also lowers the risk of chronic liver disease, while others have found no effect.

Antioxidant Supplements. There is some preliminary laboratory evidence that various antioxidant supplements -- including vitamin E, selenium, and S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) -- may help protect against liver damage and cirrhosis. Supplements, however, are not recommended for people with liver disease except with the advice of a doctor. Some vitamins, such as vitamins D and A, are metabolized in the liver and can be toxic.

Iron Restrictions. Elevated iron levels have been associated with cirrhosis from many causes. Patients should avoid iron-rich foods, such as red meats, liver, and iron-fortified cereals, and should avoid cooking with iron-coated cookware and utensils.

Supplemental Nutritional Products. Supplemental nutritional beverages may be helpful, particularly for patients with both alcoholism and cirrhosis. In one study, patients with both alcoholism and cirrhosis drank Ensure every day as a supplement to their regular diet. After 6 months they showed significant improvement in many signs of overall health compared to those who did not consume the beverage.

Vitamin B1 (Thiamine). Thiamine binds to iron and helps reduce iron load in the liver. One small study suggested it may be helpful for patients with chronic hepatitis B. It is not known if it has any benefit for cirrhosis. Pork is high in the vitamin, but more healthful sources include dried fortified cereals, oatmeal, corn, nuts, cauliflower, sunflower seeds and vitamin pills.

Like most vitamins, vitamin B1 may be obtained in the recommended amount with a well-balanced diet, including some enriched or fortified foods.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Some research suggests that supplements of omega-3 fatty acids (found in fish oil and evening primrose oil) may help protect the diseased liver.

Click the icon to see an image of omega-3 fatty acids.

Protein and Soy. High-quality dietary protein may be especially helpful for patients with ascites and for repairing muscle mass, but excessive protein loads may trigger encephalopathy. Protein solutions have been devised that provide beneficial amino acids without including those that increase this risk. There is no limit on vegetable proteins, such as those from soy.

Salt Restriction. Restricting salt consumption to less than 2,000 mg a day is particularly important for patients with ascites. The less salt the better.

Zinc. In some studies, taking zinc supplements have lowered ammonia levels in some patients who were zinc-deficient, a common problem in cirrhosis. Zinc replacement may reduce frequency and severity of muscle cramps and may even help protect against encephalopathy.

Fluid restriction is not usually necessary, but patients with severe ascites should discuss limiting fluid with their doctors.

Exercise increases the risk for portal pressure and variceal bleeding. One study reported that taking a beta-blocker may reduce this risk, although patients should discuss this with their doctor.

Infections can have a severe impact on the liver. Although most respiratory infections generally affect only the lungs, one small study suggested influenza may directly affect the liver in patients with cirrhosis and exacerbate the disease process. Researchers in the study advise annual flu shots for people with cirrhosis.

Patients should be aware that manufacturers of herbal remedies and dietary supplements do not need FDA approval to sell their products. Just like a drug, herbs and supplements can affect the body's chemistry, and therefore have the potential to produce side effects that may be harmful. There have been several reported cases of serious and even lethal side effects from herbal products. Patients should always check with their doctors before using any herbal remedies or dietary supplements.

Among the natural substances being investigated for liver disease are ginseng, glycyrrhizin (a compound in licorice), catechin (found in green tea), SAMe, and silymarin (found in milk thistle).

Silymarin. Silymarin is a chemical found in the milk thistle herb. It is one of the most popular, and most studied, herbal remedies for liver disease. Some studies have indicated that silymarin may help improve liver enzyme levels. However, a 2005 review found that milk thistle did not help reduce deaths from liver disease caused by alcohol or hepatitis.

S-adenosylmethionine. S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) is a chemical found in all parts of the body, which declines with age. It has been investigated for years in Europe for arthritis, depression, and liver disease. Some preliminary studies suggest it may provide some protection against liver damage and scarring and may improve survival rates in alcoholic patients with cirrhosis. It is very expensive, however, and as with all unregulated products, long-term side effects, drug interactions, and other factors are not fully known.

The following warnings are of particular importance for people with liver disease:

Kava kava (an herb used for anxiety and tension) can be toxic to the liver and cause severe hepatitis and even liver failure if taken excessively.

Abdominal Infections

Antibiotics are administered when fluid examination and tests for ascites indicate infection. For a first episode, the antibiotic cefotaxime is typically administered intravenously, requiring hospitalization. Treatment usually lasts 10 days, but research indicates that 5 days may be sufficient for certain patients. Some research indicates that the oral antibiotic ofloxacin may work as well with fewer complications, allowing patients to be treated at home.

In advanced cirrhosis, the risk for serious abdominal infection is high, and the antibiotic norfloxacin is often prescribed preventively against specific organisms that infect the abdominal cavity. One study reported, however, that patients who took norfloxacin became susceptible to Staphylococcal infections. Long-term treatments with norfloxacin or similar antibiotics may increase the risk for fungal infections after liver transplantation.

Encephalopathy

The first step in managing encephalopathy (damage to the brain) is to treat any precipitating cause, such as:

High ammonia levels
Bleeding
Low oxygen
Dehydration
Infection
Use of sedatives

Some studies indicate that manganese poisoning may be partially responsible for encephalopathy in cirrhosis. Studies are needed to determine if drugs that remove manganese improve this complication.

Ammonia is the leading toxin in causing encephalopathy related to cirrhosis. Mild encephalopathy is managed by directing therapy toward eliminating ammonia in the intestine:

The first step is to restrict animal protein, substituting meats and dairy products with vegetable protein, such as soy, and amino acid supplements.
Enemas, which clean out the intestine, may be effective.
Lactulose (Cephulac, Chronulac, Constulose, Duphalac, Enulose) and lactitol, known as disaccharides, help lower blood ammonia levels and have been shown to be effective in improving cognitive function and quality of life in people with mild encephalopathy.
Antibiotics, such as metronidazole, rifamycin, or neomycin, are effective in reducing levels of ammonia-producing bacteria in the intestine, although long-term use of these drugs can cause toxic side effects. Rifaximin (Xifaxan), another antibiotic, was approved in 2005 for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.
L. acidophilus is the probiotic found in live culture yogurt. Researchers are studying whether L. acidophilus food or supplements can aid in improving liver and cognitive functions.
Researchers are investigating whether exercise can help remove ammonia from the body and improve encephalopathy.

Investigational Drugs. Certain drugs, such as rifaximin (Xifaxan) and flumazenil (Mazicon, Romazicon), are under investigation for treating encephalopathy. Flumazenil is typically administered to counteract the effects of sedatives.

Ascites

Nearly all patients with ascites (fluid accumulation in the abdomen) can benefit from the following measures:

Abstaining from alcohol. (Sometimes abstaining from alcohol is enough to improve this complication.)
Restricting salt.
Taking diuretics, usually spironolactone (Aldactone) and furosemide (Lasix). Previously, spironolactone was usually given alone, but experts now use it by itself only in patients with minimal fluid buildup. Patients should be monitored carefully for excessive and too-fluid loss, which can set off complications, including hypokalemia (dangerously low potassium levels), kidney failure, or encephalopathy. Weight loss from diuretics usually should not exceed 1 - 2 pounds per day, but there is no limit for patients with massive swelling.

Doctors often recommend bed rest for patients with ascites, but studies do not support its benefits. Restricting fluid is not usually necessary unless sodium levels in the blood are very low.

Patients with recurring ascites, or ascites that does not respond to standard diuretics after a month (refractory ascites), may require procedures to reduce fluid.

Large-Volume Paracentesis. Large-volume paracentesis is the current standard procedure and involves the following:

Large volumes of fluid are removed through a tube in the abdomen. Research indicates that 4 - 6 liters are usually effective and safe.
Albumin (protein) may be administered intravenously. This helps prevent a sudden drop in blood flow in the arteries. One study suggested that terlipressin, a drug that constricts blood vessels, may be as effective.
If the ascites does not respond to treatments, the patient may need paracentesis every 2 weeks or more frequently, and up to 10 liters may need to be removed.

Patients who need this procedure are probably not complying with dietary requirements.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. Studies have been mixed on whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) improves survival without transplantation compared to large-volume paracentesis. An important 2003 study reported that although TIPS reduced the number of paracenteses, there was no improvement in survival rates. In addition, patients who were given TIPS had a higher risk for encephalopathy than those given large-volume paracentesis. In general, TIPS should be a second-line option for ascites that does not respond to diuretics.

Peritoneovenous Shunting. Peritoneovenous shunting is an older, more invasive, procedure involving insertion of a tube, or shunt, under the skin that routes the fluid from the abdomen into the jugular vein. The procedure can have serious complications, including infection, blood clots, encephalopathy, and rupture of blood vessels in the esophagus. It is now generally reserved for patients who are not candidates for repeat paracentesis or liver transplantation.

Hepatorenal syndrome can occur in patients with ascites. This is a life-threatening condition in which the kidneys fail in trying to compensate for altered blood flow in the liver. Studies suggest that terlipressin may be an effective treatment in combination with albumin for hepatorenal syndrome.

Researchers are testing certain drugs that may correct the imbalances in circulation that lead to portal hypertension and ascites. Of particular interest are drugs called nonpeptide vasopressin antagonists, also referred to as aquaretics. They may reverse the dilation in blood vessels that lead to salt and fluid retention.

The prognosis for patients with ascites is poor, even with intensive procedures. Liver transplantation should be considered for patients when ascites does not respond to treatments and when poor liver function or other complications, such as peritonitis or kidney failure, are present.

Bleeding Episodes

Preventing an Initial Bleeding Episode. About half of patients with mild-to-moderate cirrhosis have esophageal varices (enlarged veins in the esophagus). In such patients, the risk for bleeding within 2 years is as high as 35%. Bleeding is fatal in half of these patients. In general, experts recommend preventive drugs for such patients, even if they have not been screened with endoscopy -- the procedure needed to actually detect varices. Beta-blockers are the only medications to date that have some preventive effects, but others are under investigation.

Guidelines for Treating Bleeding Episodes. The doctor should first be certain that bleeding is caused by portal hypertension and ruptured varices and not by other conditions. For example, patients with cirrhosis are also at higher than average risk for bleeding peptic ulcers.

Saline or Ringers solution (a fluid and electrolyte replenisher) followed by red blood cells and plasma is administered immediately to replace lost blood.

The next step is to immediately achieve normal blood clotting (hemostasis) in order to stop the current bleeding episode and prevent early recurrence, which typically occurs 3 - 5 days after a bleeding episode.

In general it is a two-pronged approach using drugs and endoscopy procedures.

Drugs. Either octreotide or vasopressin are typically used to reduce portal pressure and blood flow.
Endoscopy. Endoscopy involves insertion of a thin tube containing a tiny camera followed by surgery to make repairs. Endoscopic sclerotherapy is the most common procedure. Emergency sclerotherapy is often used as first-line therapy for variceal bleeding, but a major 2002 analysis suggested that it is no more effective than drugs for stopping bleeding, and it has potentially serious adverse effects.

A combination of drugs and endoscopy is the best approach for stopping bleeding compared to endoscopy alone. It is not clear if there is any difference in long-term survival, however.

Prevent Bleeding Recurrence. Rebleeding is common after an episode. Beta-blocker drugs are typically used, although they are not effective for many patients.

Preventing Complications. The patient who is experiencing a bleeding episode is at high risk for other complications, including pneumonia, bacterial infections, and hepatic encephalopathy. Bacterial infections can also impair blood clotting. Preventive oral antibiotics are often problematic in these patients. One study suggested that intravenous ciprofloxacin may be helpful.

Beta-Blockers. Beta-blockers, typically propranolol (Inderal) or nadolol (Corgard), reduce the heart rate and can lower portal vein pressure in many patients and so reduce variceal bleeding. Carvedilol (Coreg), a newer drug, may be even more effective, but more research is needed. Beta-blockers are also used as a primary approach for prevention of recurring bleeding. Nevertheless, they fail to reduce portal pressure in nearly 40% of patients with cirrhosis. They may not be appropriate for patients with type 1 diabetes, asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis. They must be taken for at least 2 years and most likely longer to sustain a survival advantage.

Other Drugs. Other drugs are being used or investigated, mostly in combination with beta-blockers, to reduce recurrence rates.

Isosorbide mononitrate is a nitrate, a type of drug commonly used for angina. Combinations with beta-blockers appear to prevent rebleeding more effectively than beta-blockers alone. It is not clear if the combination improves any other aspects of the disease. The nitrate may also be an alternative drug for patients who cannot tolerate beta-blockers. Studies have failed to show any survival advantage, however, when isosorbide mononitrate is used alone.
The diuretic spironolactone may be helpful in combination with a beta-blocker for reducing both ascites and rebleeding after an initial episode.
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists, including losartan (Cozaar), are being studied for lowering portal pressure.

Somatostatinand Similar Drugs. Somatostatin is a natural hormone that constricts blood vessels. This drug or synthetic derivatives (octreotide and vapreotide) may be more effective than the common procedure, endoscopic sclerotherapy, for controlling bleeding. No single drug is more effective than another. Their benefits for improving overall survival, however, are still uncertain, and a major analysis of current studies found no effects on survival rates with either octreotide or somatostatin.

Somatostatin, the natural hormone, controlled variceal bleeding in 87% of patients in one study, but it is short acting.
Octreotide (Sandostatin) is a derivative of somatostatin and is longer acting. It has largely replaced the older drug. It is very safe, even for heart patients, and has few serious side effects.
Vapreotide (Octastatin) also resembles somatostatin. One study concluded that a combination of vapreotide and endoscopic treatment is more effective than endoscopic treatment alone for controlling bleeding, but the combination therapy did not improve mortality rates at 42 days. The study suggested that these drugs should be taken for 5 days.

Vasoconstrictors. Vasoconstrictors narrow the blood vessels and reduce flow in the spleen. They are particularly effective when used with nitroglycerin.

Vasopressin (Pitressin) is the most commonly used vasoconstrictor. It poses a risk to the heart, however, and it is not clear whether it is actually helpful.
Terlipressin is a synthetic version of vasopressin that is proving to be as effective as sclerotherapy in controlling bleeding. It also lacks vasopressin's side effects and may prove to prolong survival and serve as a bridge for patients waiting for liver transplantation.

Endoscopic procedures use a tube inserted down through the esophagus, containing microcameras and tiny instruments. Endoscopy is used both to diagnose the disease and stop bleeding. The two standard procedures are band ligation and sclerotherapy. In general, a combination of drug therapies and an endoscopic procedure is the usual approach for preventing a bleeding recurrence.

Endoscopic Band Ligation. In endoscopic band ligation, latex bands are wrapped around the bleeding varices, shutting off the blood supply. It is the method of choice to control of bleeding and, in weekly sessions, to prevent rebleeding, because it has a lower risk for complications than sclerotherapy. Recurrence rates are higher with band ligation, however. Studies are mixed on whether weekly treatments with band ligation are any more effective in preventing rebleeding than beta-blockers plus isosorbide mononitrate. A combination of medications plus band ligation is under investigation.

Investigators are studying argon plasma coagulation (APC) after band ligation to prevent variceal recurrence and rebleeding. This procedure uses argon gas to deliver electric currents that coagulate and stop bleeding.

Endoscopic Sclerotherapy. Endoscopic sclerotherapy is only effective against bleeding in the esophagus. The endoscopic tube is inserted through the mouth. A sclerosant (a solution that toughens the tissue around the variceal blood vessels) is injected to stop the bleeding. The procedure is repeated over a period of 2 - 3 months. Repeat treatments appear to reduce rebleeding and death. Minor complications (usually ulcers in the mucus membranes) are common, and serious complications can occur (narrowing or perforation of the esophagus and leakage at the injection site.)

Balloon tamponade has been available for years, but it is now used only for bleeding that cannot be controlled by drugs or endoscopy. It uses a tube inserted through the nose and down through the esophagus until it reaches the upper part of the stomach. A balloon at the tube's end is inflated and positioned tightly against the esophageal wall. It is usually deflated in about 24 hours. Serious complications can occur, the most dangerous being rupture of the esophagus. Recurrence of bleeding is common.

Shunts are used for patients who are still bleeding in the esophagus after endoscopic sclerotherapy or who are bleeding in the stomach. Choices include the following:

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)
A surgical shunt

Shunt operations usually eliminate variceal bleeding, but encephalopathy and shunt failure are frequent complications. Doctors do not recommend shunts as elective surgery for high-risk patients who are candidates for liver transplantation, since shunts make this operation more difficult.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic (or portal-systemic) shunt (TIPS) involves the following:

The patient only requires a local anesthetic and a sedative.
A long needle is inserted into the jugular vein in the neck and passed down through the vena cava, a large vein that conducts blood back to the heart. This serves to widen the vein.
The surgeon makes an incision in the hepatic vein in the liver and creates a connection to the portal vein.
A cylindrical wire-mesh stent is inserted into this connecting vein.
The stent now acts as a shunt, which reroutes blood around the scarred liver.

TIPS is a good choice for bleeding that is not controlled by endoscopy, particularly when it is performed shortly after a bleeding episode. It also reduces ascites.

It is not useful as the first choice for stopping an initial bleeding episode or for preventing rebleeding, however, since it poses a high risk for encephalopathy. This complication outweighs its benefits compared to endoscopy for initial treatment and to beta-blockers for preventing recurrence. Blockage or closure of the shunt can develop over time.

TIPS is generally recommended for only patients who:

Cannot tolerate sclerotherapy
Are unlikely or unable to comply with the repeated procedures necessary for sclerotherapy
Have poor blood circulation

Surgical Shunts. There are two types of surgical shunts:

A portal shunt, or portal systemic shunt. It was introduced in 1945 and was the first significant treatment for bleeding varices. It relieves pressure in the portal vein by surgically joining it to the inferior vena cava, a large vein that conducts blood back to the heart. It poses a high risk for encephalopathy and does not appear to improve survival, so is not used often.
A variation called the H-graft portacaval shunt is a partial shunt that is proving to be effective for treating bleeding. It controls bleeding in 90% of patients and has a lower encephalopathy rate than the complete portal shunt or TIPS. In fact, early studies report that it may have lower rates for transplantation and death than TIPS.
A distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) preserves blood flow through the portal vein while relieving pressure on the varices by joining the left kidney vein to the splenic vein. (The splenic vein returns blood from the spleen and is one of two veins that form the portal vein.) Studies show that DSRS has similar mortality rates compared to the portal shunt but lower rates of encephalopathy afterwards. Patients with alcoholic cirrhosis fare worse with DSRS than nonalcoholic patients. It is probably best used as an elective operation in patients with good liver function who continue to bleed in spite of endoscopy.

Resources

www2.niddk.nih.gov -- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
www.aasld.org -- American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
www.liverfoundation.org -- American Liver Foundation
www.gastro.org -- American Gastrointestinal Association
www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis -- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hepatitis
www.hepfi.org -- Hepatitis Foundation International
www.pbcers.org -- Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Organization
www.organdonor.org -- National Transplant Society
www.unos.org -- United Network for Organ Sharing
www.organdonor.gov -- US government organ donor site

References

Bruno S, Crosignani A, Maisonneuve P, Rossi S, Silini E, Mondelli MU. Hepatitis C virus genotype 1b as a major risk factor associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: A seventeen-year prospective cohort study. Hepatology. 2007 Aug 6; [Epub ahead of print]

Bruno S, Stroffolini T, Colombo M, Bollani S, Benvegnu L, Mazzella G, et al. Sustained virological response to interferon-alpha is associated with improved outcome in HCV-related cirrhosis: a retrospective study. Hepatology. 2007 Mar;45(3):579-87.

Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, Thorelius L, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006 Oct;44(4):865-73.

Huang H, Shiffman ML, Friedman S, Venkatesh R, Bzowej N, Abar OT, et al. A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007 Aug;46(2):297-306.

Prasad S, Dhiman RK, Duseja A, Chawla YK, Sharma A, Agarwal R. Lactulose improves cognitive functions and health-related quality of life inpatients with cirrhosis who have minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2007 Mar;45(3):549-59.

Suzuki A, Lymp J, Donlinger J, Mendes F, Angulo P, Lindor K. Clinical predictors for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Feb;5(2):259-64. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hemochromatosis: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 1;145(3):204-8.

Whitlock EP, Garlitz BA, Harris EL, Beil TL, Smith PR. Screening for hereditary hemochromatosis: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 1;145(3):209-23.

Review Date:
8/31/2007
Reviewed By:
Harvey Simon, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital.

A.D.A.M. Copyright

adam.com